Quantcast
Channel: Musings of an Unknown Indian
Viewing all 92 articles
Browse latest View live

Colpetty People by Ashok Ferry

$
0
0


I have never read Ashok Ferry before, never even heard of him. But Colpetty People (the name, that is) piqued my interest sufficiently enough to want to sample Sri Lankan lit. Sri Lanka, as we all know, is the land of smart wicket-keepers, stylish batsmen, and at least one streaked-haired bowler with a penchant for hurling toe-crushing Slingas. Besides, this emerald island is also well-known for people (incl. cricketers) with incredibly short names, such as: Warnakulasuriya Patabendige Ushantha Joseph Chaminda Vaas. And last but not the least... it is also home to Shehan Karunatilaka - who for some yet-to-be-deciphered reason called his first offering, 'Chinaman'.

However, what not many may be aware of is this: Sri Lanka is also the land of Lunu Miris (made by grinding on a granite grinding stone or pounding in a mortar and pestle [wangediya] to make, like a salsa, a mixture of red onions, dried chilli flakes, maldive fish, sea salt and lime juice). If maldive fish cannot be found, dry prawns or shrimp will do. It is the katta sambole that is famous throughout Sri Lanka. We may call it fish pickle. It's spicy. But imagine making pickle out of fish. That is pure, unalloyed genius.

Colpetty People, though, does not have any mention of Lunu Miris. But let me not digress.

Ashok Ferrey: Sri Lanka born (in Colombo), raised in East Africa, educated at a Benedictine monastery in the wilds of Sussex, Ferrey read Pure Math at Christ Church Oxford, ending up in Brixton, converting Victorian houses during the Thatcher years. He describes himself as a failed builder, indifferent mathematician, barman and personal trainer to the rich and infamous of Colombo.

However, with five books to his name, he is now an established author. [Though his sales aren't as high as he might like here, Ashok is a well-known face in Sri Lanka.]

In recent months, he's added 'nomad' to the list. Ferry has been doing some traveling on the literary circuit, visiting Bhutan, Leipzig and Brunei. Where his books are not on sale, he carries them himself in a suitcase, bringing the empty container back after having met with many enthusiastic readers. He's excited about the response his books will garner in the much vaster Indian market, thanks to Random House.

Ferrey's first collection of short stories, Colpetty People, was short-listed for the Gratiaen Prize, Sri Lanka's premier literary award, in 2003. It remains the top-selling book in English by a local author writing in Sri Lanka till date. His second collection, The Good Little Ceylonese Girl, was published in December 2006. It too was short-listed for the Gratiaen Prize. Serendipity, his third book and a novel, was short-listed for the State Literary Awards last year. Love in the Tsunami followed this. The Professional is his latest book.

Today Ferrey continues to design houses, besides being a guest lecturer at the Colombo School of Architecture and the host of his own TV show, The Ashok Ferrey Show, an arts program on national television. In his spare time he is a personal trainer to the rich and infamous of Colombo.

Colpetty, or Kollupitiya, Bazaar is a thin strip of land which lies alongside the Galle Road in Colombo. Full of shops, the Colpetty Bazaar and the Galle Face Hotel, a Victorian-styled architectural gem where royalty and famous writers have resided... make this one of the most beautiful and interesting parts of Colombo. Scarcely two decades ago the Colpetty (now its Kollupitiya) market was virtually the only place in Colombo for people to do their grocery shopping. Now though options have expanded, the Kollupitiya Market remains a fascinating place.

Colpetty People, the author's debut collection of short stories, is an assembled bouquet of 18 short stories, each one different from the other and with its own unique flavour, comprising characters that are 'serious and fine and upstanding, and infinitely dull'. The stories, all 18 of them, vary in length. There's one that is all of 2 pages, another all of 3 pages, and while some take up 14-15 pages, yet others run through 20 or 24 pages. However, none of them fall victim to lyricism, which is good... it makes the readers' journey easier.

This collection brings together a motley bunch of characters - Sri Lankans at home and abroad (in Africa and England): social-climbing Sri Lankans, the pathos of immigration, Colombo's nouveau riche, hoity-toity returnees, old-fashioned aristocrats, and the poor mortals trapped between them. There's the forever to-ing and fro-ing Mr. And Mrs. Herath, and the latter's friend, Mrs. Sarath - who ensured that there wasn't a single poor man in Chislehurst who hadn't suffered from her charitable ministrations; Upali - who wore Ralph Lorensz and was expected to cook, clean, look after the dog and do the odd bit of gardening, such as helping out Mr. Herath with his sweet potatoes; the Oxford couple - Marion and Harry, Frankie - who checked out of Oxford halfway through his math degree and became an apprentice carpenter under Ernie, Maya - Frankie's better half; Dev (akaDave) and Olivia, the Filipino vendor, Potente Militante Aguacaliente akaO-ping; Quentin (not Tarantino) - Colombo's most eligible bachelor, Themis - who cooked watery curries, and so on. Ferry's first-hand experience of all these worlds comes across both in settings and tone. His depiction of life lived by the Sri Lankan upper classes in Colombo come wrapped in gentle sarcasm and authentic Lunu Miris humour. The stories and characters (happy-go-lucky playboy-cum-part-time-model-cum-lazybones Jiggy, the English teacher-at seventeen: Romesh, Catherine de silva - whose one great desire was to visit the Imperial Capital, the diffident Professor Jayaweera - who finds sterile freedoms caged in the 'unbending, straight lines of Western Justice', the little Kumarihamyat the walauwa, the nanny-cum-cook, Agnes of God - who stuffed a crab better than others; Mrs. Badugoda - with a flair for the dramatic, the long suffering Auntie Charm (aka Auntie Chamari) and her capricious better-half, Uncle Sid, at whose funeral the place was crawling with ex-wives; Kapila - who bought and sold old furniture, Arul - a big bear of a man who had the patience to put up with everything including Surangani's 'Prayer Clinic'; Max Kohlmeyer and his little heartwarming victory, the tough old Kandyanfrom the mountains who bequeathed his kavichiya - his very elegant ebony couch with Grecian lines - toAshoka, and even the stuffed pigeon-and-eel-eating orange tabby cat - Arabella) leave the reader with the distinct feeling that Ferry knows most of the characters that people his book. In fact, Ashok himself is one of the eclectic characters inhabiting several stories.

I enjoyed the style of writing, the malice-towards-none Sri Lankan English and the author's gentle snarkiness that says: laugh with me. The Sri Lankan English is a big USP. Why would anyone want to read about life in Sri Lanka or about SL expats written in Indian English or even in Queen's English? That would have interfered with the flavour and quaint charm that runs throughout this book. Instead, Ashok accurately portrays Sri Lanka in all its diversity.

Ferrey serves his readers with vignettes of a social order that thrives on gossip, appearances and dwindling fortunes. There is a mélange of emotions: funny, witty, mystery, black humour, wry and dry humour, sad, generous, absurd, uncanny, romance, philosophical, profound, pathos, old age, dark, eternity, coming of age... all effortlessly look through the external appearances. There are sharp observations about human frailties, emotions, ceremonies, the past and present; the world of natives and of those who have crossed the oceans... and yet haven't been able to sever the bonds with the land of their birth.

Here are some snippets for you to savour:

From:A Few Days After Eleven:

"The Italians talked till you were blue in the face, then they smoked at you, then they talked some more. Those were the days when talking and smoking were the Italian national pastimes.

When John-John reached for the sick bag the third time, though, there was a momentary hush. Sri Lanka one, Italy nil, he thought victoriously.

But the Italians struck back at lunch - liver, the great equalizer. Those were the days an airline could serve you liver for lunch and get away with it. John-John left it untouched. His sick bag was full anyway."

From:Ice Cream Karma:

'You can call me Kumarihamy,' said the Kumarihamy.

'Committee Mary? What a charming name!'

The Kumarihamy gave up and led them into the house, leaving her slippers ostentatiously on the veranda and walking in barefoot. The others, unsure of what to do, did not follow suit.

She paused. 'Of course, we do make exceptions, for people like you who would find that difficult.'

'How wonderful, Karate Mummy, how ethnic!'

From:Agnes of God:

"I was to be found at all hours of the night walking up and down, up and down the veranda, while the baby practiced scales. He was particularly good in C sharp minor."

All Devi's friends were there, dressed in black, the colour of choice that year for young nannied couples. The nannies themselves were out in the garden, decorously drinking orangeade under the avocado tree.

Avril, just to be bloody-minded, was in beige, Gucci or Pucci or whatever."

My Two Pence Worth:The production value of the book is good, barely any editing errors. The book jacket cover is colourful with an ethnic touch. Colpetty Bazaar, maybe? The title story has a supernatural twist. And though all the stories appear uniformly simple on first read, I intend to re-read the collection soon... to delve beyond the surface. My favourite? Honestly, I can't choose.

The only thing that's missing is a glossary of terms so that readers can understand the meaning of various Sri Lankan words, terms and references.

I am going with a 3/5 for Ashok Ferry's Colpetty People. Must say that literature is alive and well in Sri Lanka and I look forward to reading 'The Good Little Ceylonese Girl' next. 


Details of the book:Colpetty People/ Author: Ashok Ferry/ Publisher: Vintage Books, an imprint of Random House India/ Binding: Paperback/ Publishing Date: 2012/ Genre: Fiction/ ISBN: 978-8-184-00306-2/ ISBN-13: 9788184003062/ Pages: 194/ Price: INR 299.

Picture: The book jacket cover of Colpetty People. Courtesy: link.   

Random 6.0

$
0
0

This week the moon helps sky-watchers catch some celestial fish and trawl the night sky for the most distant worlds in our solar system. Besides: while planets parade from dusk to dawn, and some shooting stars whet sky-watchers appetite, towards the end of July, a comet posed for a deep-sky photo op. ... And a much-anticipated icy interloper.

1.Blooming Celestial Flower: Like a flower in full bloom, this colorful portrait of the Rosette nebula was taken through a backyard telescope in Alabama on August 13.


Located some 5,000 light-years from Earth, this stellar nursery measures 130 light-years across and is a hotbed of star formation.

Massive newborn stars emit intense radiation that has hollowed out the central core of the nebula, blowing the gas and dust into an expanding shell that glows like a neon sign.

2.Pisces Circlet:  On the night of Thursday, August 22, the moon is positioned just below the "Circlet," the most easily recognizable part of the constellation Pisces [Sanskrit: Meen], or The Fish. Marking the head of the fish that points westward, this circular pattern of seven faint stars is barely visible with the unaided eye from light polluted city suburbs.


While the nearby moon will make for a convenient guidepost, its glare will require the use of binoculars to help track it down no matter how clear the skies. Look for the Circlet to span about 5 degrees across the sky.

[Like a pair of fishes, the last rashi of the rashichakra, Meen (Pisces) denotes the feet of the Kaal Purusha (Ursha major). However, Kaal Purusha or Kaal Purush can also mean, beyond time. Kaal = Time. Purush/Purusha = Cosmic Energy. 

It describes the Almighty - the Viraat Purush, the Cosmic Being or the Primordial Being... who is the motive power behind the mathematically precise universes. 

Kaala means time in Sanskrit. Every thing is consumed by time except the Viraat Purush. He is eternal-uncreated. Viraat means very big, unlimited, infinite... so much so, that the human mind cannot fully comprehend Him. Ever.

Therefore, the purusha (cosmic energy) who is beyond time (kaal) and who presides over the all-destructive time is known as Kaal Purush. 

A pair of fishes is an auspicious symbol in Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism.] 

The number 11 (eleven):  is the natural number following 10 and preceding 12. In English, it is the smallest positive integer requiring three syllables and the largest prime number with a single-morpheme name. Its etymology originates from a Germanic compound ainlif meaning "one left". An 11-sided polygon is called a hendecagon or undecagon. (The name hendecagon, from Greek hendeka"eleven" and gon -"corner", is often preferred to the hybrid undecagon, whose first syllable un - is Latin for "one".) In chemistry, Group 11 includes the three-coinage metals copper, silver, and gold known from antiquity. It also includes the super-heavy element roentgenium, which was discovered only recently. The approximate periodicity of a sunspot cycle is 11 years. Messier object M11, a magnitude 7.0 open cluster in the constellation Scutum (Latin for shield), also known as the Wild Duck Cluster. The 11th moon of Jupiter (Brihaspati) is Himalia. 

In numerology:Since ancient times Numerology uses numbers as a key to observe and understand human behavior. It is considered a science of vibration. Numerology can be called the oldest mathematics of the universe. Everything is energy. Everything is vibration. Numerology is the language of vibrational frequencies, encompassing both the intuitive and scientific root that our existence is based on. There are many different realities, all abiding in the same universe at the same time, what distinguishes our self-expression is our vibration, how attuned we are, how connected to the whole. Numerology contains the model of the entire universe.

Everything is reduced to a single digit, so even if one has a compound birthday number, such as twenty-one, when reduced to a single digit, becomes a three and is ruled by Jupiter (Bṛhaspati - often written as Brihaspati or Bruhaspati,"lord of prayer or devotion", also known as Deva-guru - the most beneficial sign of any of the planets. Bṛhaspati rules over the signs Dhanu [Sagittarius] and Meen [Pisces]. He is exalted in Karka [Cancer] and fallen in Makara [Capricorn]. The Sun, Moon and Mars are considered friendly to Bṛhaspati, Mercury is hostile and Saturn is neutral. Bṛhaspati in Vedic astrology is considered to be of the element aether (space) or Akasha Tattva [i.e. Akasha = Space/Sky/Aether; Tattva = Essence/Category/Truth.] This element indicates vastness, growth and expansion in a person's life. Bṛhaspati also represents the balance of past karma, dharma, philosophy and knowledge. He is concerned with education, teaching and the dispensation of knowledge. The following items are associated with Bṛhaspati: his color is yellow, his metal is gold, and his gemstones are yellow topaz and yellow sapphire. The season associated with him is winter, direction is north-east and his element is aether or space. He presides over 'Guru-var' or Thursday.) Number eleven and twenty-two are considered master numbers. Here the vibration of the two (moon) and the four (Rahu) is intensified and these individuals will shine in their unique contribution to humanity. 

Number 11: Charismatic and inspiring. Their life path number is Master Number 11 or 11/2, and such a person has a unique and special path to follow. This number combines all the traits of number 1 (The Primal Force or The Pioneer) twice over, and at the same time includes all the characteristics of highly charged number 2 (The All-knowing or The Philosopher). A number 11 is a born charismatic leader, someone others look to for truth (dharma) and illumination, which could even be spiritual.

1- The Primal Force or The Pioneer:The 1 is a doer; a powerful force that produces results and does not allow anything or anyone to limit its potential. The 1 is positively aggressive, a necessary energy for creating. The 1 is always in the forefront: a spearpoint directing and leading others. The shape of the number 1, just like the shape of all other symbols, reflects it's meaning; it walks upright with pride and purpose. Strong, determined, unwavering and with specific goals in mind, the 1 can turn dreams and ideas into reality. It pushes obstacles aside or simply drills right through them.

The 1 grows, transforms and improves in perpetuity, precisely the way Mother Nature does. After all, nature's primal force and most basic building block is the number 1. Scientists sometimes compete with nature, genetically altering fruits or breeding bugs for specific purposes. An understanding of nature teaches us that this is never a good idea and almost always produces unexpected backlashes. The number 1 has a similar built-in perfection and balance; you can force a change here or there, but negative repercussions are likely.

The 1 tends to see things in a linear way, which makes it easy to set goals and achieve them. It trusts its own ability to separate right (positive) from wrong (negative) or the grain from the chaff. It doesn't waste time on abstract ideas or anything else that isn't in line with its pursuit of results. The 1 is no preacher, no philosopher, no spiritual explorer, no dreamer and certainly not an idealist. It is a pragmatist, a conqueror and a warrior extraordinaire. It is a loner and independent to a fault. It will attempt to force its values and opinions on you but it won't accept, or even listen to, yours.

The 1 does not hesitate when it senses a need for confrontation. It is jealous and extremely stubborn, but also courageous and willing to try anything new if it sees promise, even at great peril. It is, if you haven't guessed, the most 'masculine' of all numbers. There is a certain quality, a sense of honour and responsibility that commands our respect, and it has a sense of justice that cannot be denied. Its purity of purpose is an admirable quality of the number 1. It sees things for what they are and hypocrisy doesn't stand a chance. Befriend a 1 and you have a friend for life. You can poke fun at a 1 and not have to worry about hurt feelings. A 1 has a great capacity for humour, including the self-deprecating kind. If the 1 is your enemy, you will be crushed.

2 -The All-knowing or The Philosopher:As the most 'feminine' among all numbers, the 2 is also the most underestimated - at least, when it comes to power and strength. After all, she is almost always gentle, tactful, diplomatic, forgiving and understanding. Certainly, she likes to keep the peace and will avoid confrontations as much as possible.

If you look at the shape of the 2, however, you will recognize a symbolic representation of the ultimate survivor and an extremely resilient force. Her shape, as if bent on a knee with her head and back bowed in humility and servitude, makes it easy to dismiss her as weak and powerless. This is in stark contrast to the power and pride of the mighty and masculine 1, who will not bow for anyone at any price. However, when enough pressure is applied to the powerful warrior we see in the number 1, he will break and shatter and be done with.

On the other hand, when the humble number 2 finds herself under attack and burdened with a crushing weight, she will bend, she will bend as much as needed. And when the weight is removed, her elastic, flexible nature allows her to come right back up, seemingly with little harm done, and she will continue to play her role. Her strength and power is resilient and lasting, just as the shape of the number 2 reflects that so beautifully. There is much more to her than meets the eye. As we stand in awe to the leadership and decisive actions of the 1, his strength and cunning relies on the clever and insightful advice of his greatest ally, the number 2.

Unnoticed and operating from the shadows, she outwits other spies and diplomats with her grace, her ability to enchant/charm, her flattering attention and her gentle force of persuasion. She is smart and understands the underlying qualities that make people do this or do that. A born psychologist, there is not much about human nature that escapes her. She often controls the outcome of certain events without anyone else noticing or acknowledging. In fact, the credit quite often goes to some other entity when it should be hers. This does not bother her, because among her best qualities is patience. She knows her time will come. But even if she does not always get the recognition she deserves, she tends to take a special place in the hearts and minds of others. Within a social environment, perhaps her most important asset is a sense of humour that is witty and self-depreciating, but never slapstick or juvenile, as she is far too sophisticated for that. 

The real value of her intuitive prowess is in the way she interacts with others; it is the true basis of her tact and understanding. Like a good politician, which she can certainly be if needed, she often understands the true motivations of others better than they do, and her clarity and her powers of observation often help others to understand themselves better. 

So, imagine what a Number 11is all about: combining all the traits of number 1 (The Primal Force or The Pioneer) twice over, and at the same time including all the characteristics of highly charged number 2 (The All-knowing or The Philosopher) !! Now if this does not symbolize the Cosmic Duality, what does? Reminds one of the ArdhaNarishvar concept, what say? 

3.Mars and Gemini Twins: At dawn on Tuesday, August 20, ruddy-colored Mars formed a picturesque arc formation with the bright stars Pollux and Castor from the Gemini constellation [nakShatra maNDala]. The sky scene repeated the next morning (August 21). [Incidentally, this year, Aug 20-21 was Raksha Bandhan.] Even through a telescope, the Red Planet is tiny and reveals little detail since it sits at nearly the far end of its orbit, at 218 million miles (352 million kilometers) from Earth.

The bright star to the far upper right of Mars [Sanskrit: Mangal, derived from Mangalam] is the largest planet in the solar system: Jupiter [Sanskrit: Brihaspati]. Rising ever higher in the early morning sky over the coming weeks and months, views of this 530 million mile (854 million kilometer) distant gas giant will only get better. Even a small telescope will reveal its four major moons and two distinct cloud bands. 

[In Jyotish Vidya or Vedic astrology, Mangala (Devanagari: मंगल, Maṅgala) is the name for Mars, the red planet. Mars is also called Angaraka ('one who is red in colour') or Rakta varna, one whose color is like blood, or Bhauma ('son of Bhumi' or the son of Prthvior Bhumi, the Earth Goddess) in Sanskrit. Being an aggressive planet it is a representation of the god of war. He is imagined: as red as flame-colour.

In Vedic astrology Mars is known as Mangal, Angaraka and Kuja. These names in Sanskrit mean, "auspicious, burning coal, and the fair one". Kuja is a karaka, or indicator, of brother and siblings, assertion, aggressiveness, soldiers and military endeavors, mechanical ability, engineers and surgeons, commanders and rulers, violence and war, ambition, strength, arguments and conflict, passion and desire. In Vedic astrology, Mangal is considered a malefic planet. He rules over the two sidereal signs of Aries (Mesha) and Scorpio (Vrischika). He is exalted in Capricorn (Makara) and fallen in the opposite sign of Cancer (Karka or Karkata). Maṅgala rules over blood, muscles and bone marrow. He is associated with battle, war and soldiers. Maṅgala is the lord of three nakshatrasor lunar mansions: Mrigashīrsha, Spica (Chitrā) and Sravishtha (Dhanista). Maṅgalahas the following associations: the color red, the metal brass and gemstone red coral. He is a particularly beneficial planet for Cancer or Leo Ascendants. His element is fire, i.e. his nature is Pitta, or fiery. Many myths depict the valour, strength and courage, and most fittingly, the protective quality of Mars. Thus, Mars (Mangal) is known as the protector of dharma (the right path and purpose in life or duties and responsibilities that benefit humanity/society).

Millenniums ago the Indian historical and religious text, the Rg-ved, mentions the two primary stars of the Gemini constellation as being the twin horseman who appeared at dawn, part of the Ashvins, they were known as Nakula and Sahadeva. Around that time the two stars would have been visible only at dawn during spring, leading to the idea of them being twins and associated with the spring equinox. The twin horseman corresponded to the two stars we know as Castor and Pollux and the Sanskrit name Mithun, which means the twins, correspond almost exactly to the modern Gemini constellation.

From India the constellations spread westwards to the ancient near east civilizations and by 5000 years ago ancient Babylonian people had adopted the constellations for their own astronomy which they also used to track the seasons and for navigation. To the ancient Babylonians Gemini was known as Mastabba Galgal, which (probably) translates as the great twins, heroes whose names were Gilgamesh and Enkidu, and who were part of great battles in a series of epic adventures. 

Ancient Egyptians also adopted the twin stars as an important part of their astronomy, and using two goats to symbolize the two stars which were mentioned in the Ramissede Hour Tables, a method of determining the time at any point during the night by knowing which stars followed each other. The two stars of the Gemini constellation were known to rise at dawn. 

Mrigashīrsha:Sanskrit mṛgaśiras (popularly spelled Mārgaśīrṣa/Mṛgaśira) the 5th nakṣatra or lunar mansion as used in Hindu astronomy and astrology is the constellation Orion. Its position is described in the Surya Siddhānta. The first two carana/pada (quarters) of this nakṣatra are part of Vṛṣabha Rāśior Taurus (bull). The latter half of this star belongs to Mithuna Rāśi or Gemini(from 23°20' Taurus to 6°40' Gemini). Incidentally: in Sanaatan Dharmic thought, the Bull (vṛṣabha, vrisha uttamam) signifies/symbolizes/epitomizes Dharma. Hence, the illustrious God of gods is also called Vṛṣabha - the thousand horned great bull with a hundred heads, or vrisha uttamam, the Supreme Bull (i.e. Supreme Dharma).

The term Mṛgaśira (मृगशिर) a composite of two Sanskrit words, mṛga (मृग) meaning animal/beast and śira (शिर) meaning head or precisely, the top of the head. The names Mṛgaśira (मृगशिर) and Mārgaśīrṣa/Mṛgaśīrṣa (मार्गशीर्ष) are sometimes used interchangeably. Grammatically, Mārgaśīrṣa (मार्गशीर्ष) means "of Mṛgaśira" or "related to Mṛgaśira". Thus Mṛgaśira (मृगशिर) is the correct name of the star, while Mārgaśīrṣa (मार्गशीर्ष) is the name of the month related to Mṛgaśira, i.e, the month in which moon will be in conjuncture with the Mṛgaśira nakṣatra. 

Orion is a prominent constellation located on the celestial equator and visible throughout the world. It is one of the most conspicuous and most recognizable constellations in the night sky. It was named after Orion, a hunter in Greek mythology. In old Hungarian tradition, "Orion" is known as (magic) Archer (Íjász), or Reaper (Kaszás). In recently rediscovered myths he is called Nimrod (Hungarian "Nimród"), the greatest hunter. The Babylonian star catalogues of the Late Bronze Age name Orion "The Heavenly Shepherd".



Hanging from Orion's belt is his sword, consisting of the multiple stars θ1 and θ2 Orionis, called the Trapezium and the Orion Nebula (M42). This is a spectacular object that can be clearly identified with the unaided eye as something other than a star. Using binoculars, its clouds of nascent stars, luminous gas, and dust can be observed. The Trapezium cluster has many newborn stars, including several brown dwarfs, all of which are at an approximate distance of 1,500 light-years. Named for the four bright stars that form a trapezoid, it is largely illuminated by the brightest stars, which are only a few hundred thousand years old. Observations by the Chandra X-ray Observatory show both the extreme temperatures of the main stars - up to 60,000 Kelvin - and the star forming regions still extant in the surrounding nebula. 


Orion's Belt or The Belt of Orion is an asterism within the constellation. It consists of the three bright stars Zeta (Alnitak), Epsilon (Alnilam), and Delta (Mintaka). In Puerto Rico, the three stars are known as the "Los Tres Reyes Magos" (Spanish for The three Wise Men). Alnitak is around 800 light years away from earth and, is 100,000 times more luminous than the Sun - much of its radiation is in the ultraviolet range, which the human eye cannot see. Alnilam is approximately 1340 light years away from Earth, shines with magnitude 1.70, and with ultraviolet light is 375,000 times more luminous than the Sun. Mintaka is 915 light years away and shines with magnitude 2.21. It is 90,000 times more luminous than the Sun and is a double star: the two orbit each other every 5.73 days. Looking for Orion's Belt in the night sky is the easiest way to locate the constellation. In the Northern Hemisphere, Orion's Belt is best visible in the night sky during the month of January around 9:00 pm, when it is approximately around the local meridian.

Just southwest of Alnitak lies Sigma Orionis, or Sigma Ori (σ Orionis, σ Ori) - a five-star system (that have a combined apparent magnitude of 3.7) in the constellation Orion, just to the southwest of Alnitak. It is approximately 1,150 light years from Earth. Southwest of Mintaka lies the quadruple star Eta Orionis. 

North Arrow:Together the 'Alnitak, Alnilam, and Mintaka', the 'Eta Orionis' form an arrowhead, and with the 'M42, M43' at the lower end form the tail of an arrow. All together form an arrow that always points 'North'. Therefore, it is used as navigational guide at night especially in the Sahara desert where there are not many natural signs. 

Shield:West from Bellatrix lie six stars all designated Pi Orionis (π1 Ori, π2Ori, π3 Ori, π4 Ori, π5 Ori and π6Ori) that make up Orion's shield. 

The 3 bright stars of "Orion's Belt or The Belt of Orion"(alnitak/ alnilam/ mintaka) align with the brightest star in the heavens, Sirius (in Canis Major constellation) on 25th Dec. Draw a straight line through theses 4 points - and the sun rises there. [The name "Sirius" is derived from the Ancient Greek: Seirios("glowing").] 

Inside the great pyramids sun god Osiris is Orion; his consort Isis is Sirius; Horus was their son. [Horus - the Falcon-god or the Falcon-headed man; so similar to our very own Garuda. Here it probably is a reference to the Eagle Nebula.] 

Sirius is the brightest star as seen from Earth, apart from the sun. 

Canis Major is found southeast of Orion. An easy way to locate the constellation is to locate the three stars that make up Orion's Belt and follow the stars down in a southwesterly direction until you come to the next bright star. This is Sirius in Canis Major; it's the brightest star in the constellation and the brightest star in the night sky. Sirius also has a companion star, known as Sirius B. Sirius B was the first 'white dwarf' to be discovered. 

The Horsehead Nebula (also known as Barnard 33or B33 in emission nebula IC 434) is a dark nebula in the constellation Orion. The nebula is located just to the south of the star Alnitak (a triple star system) at the eastern end of/ farthest east on Orion's belt, and is part of the much larger Orion Molecular Cloud Complex. The Horsehead Nebula is approximately 1500 light years from Earth. It is one of the most identifiable nebulae because of the shape of its swirling cloud of dark dust and gases, which bears some semblance to a horse's head when viewed from Earth. The red or pinkish glow originates from hydrogen gas predominantly behind the nebula, ionized by the nearby bright star Sigma Orionis. The darkness of the Horsehead is caused mostly by thick dust, although the lower part of the Horsehead's neck casts a shadow to the left. Streams of gas leaving the nebula are funneled by a strong magnetic field. The bright spots are young stars just in the process of forming.
 
 How to locate the star Spica (Chitrā):

A method of finding Spica is to follow the arc of the handle of the Big Dipper to Arcturus, and then continue on the same angular distance to Spica. This can be recalled by the mnemonic phrase, "follow the arc to Arcturus and speed on to Spica."]





4.Moon Joins Uranus:  Late night on Friday, August 24, watch for the moon to hover over Uranus [Sanskrit: "Arun"; Arun is the Indian God of Dawn], the closer ice giant within the giant constellation Pisces, The Fish. [Sanskrit: Meen nakShatra maNDala.]

Some Indians, though, call "Uranus" as "Indra" (the King/Ruler/God of Svarga-loka/"Heavens").

Uranus and its five major moons are depicted in this montage of images acquired by the Voyager 2 spacecraft. This week sky-watchers can track down this distant planet for themselves thanks to Earth’s moon pointing the way.


Unlike the glitzy planets of the solar system like Jupiter and Saturn, Uranus presents a much-understated view through backyard telescope. But it's an easy target for binoculars even under light pollution. Shining at 5.8 magnitude amongst a sea of much fainter stars, the minuscule, green-tinged disk is barely visible with the unaided eyes from dark, pristine skies.

5.Wizard Nebula:Looking like a celestial illusionist, the Wizard Nebula is a star-forming region located some 8000 light-years from Earth within our Milky Way galaxy.


Imaged here by the four-meter Mayall telescope at Kitt Peak National Observatory in Arizona, the giant cloud of gas and dust surrounds an open cluster of young stars some five million years old. Radiation emitted by the stellar cluster lights up the colorful nebula from which it was born.

The Wizard, known formally as NGC 7380, stretches more than 100 light-years across, appearing larger than the disk of a full moon, and is visible in small telescopes within the northern constellation Cepheus. [In Sanskrit, Cepheus is Pitṝ. However, for our ancestors Cepheus represented Kapih or Kapi. The word 'Kapi' signifies the foremost of boars - eka (one) shringa(horned) varaha, and Dharma is otherwise known by the name of Vrisha. The illustrious God of gods, therefore, is called Vrishakapi - the one-horned Varaha/Boar, the Supreme form of Shri Vishnu. (Dharma = justice; also, duties and responsibilities that benefit humanity/society. One-horned boar = ekashringa varaha or unicorn boar. It does not refer to any animal per se. It means, rarest of the rare; not to be found anywhere else. In other words: One without a parallel.)]

6.Milky Way Shores:In this breathtaking picture taken on August 11, the heart of the Milky Way galaxy appears to lap the seaside landscape at Tulka, South Australia.


7.Meteoric Meadow:A flurry of meteors fills the starry skies above a lupine meadow and Mount Hood in Oregon on August 11.


This year's Perseid shower produced an exceptionally high rate of meteors, with the bright moon out of the sky during peak nights.

Observation reports from around the world suggested as many as 70 to 80 shooting stars per hour could be seen from dark locations away from city lights.

8. Overflowing Milky Way: The Milky Way appears to pour down onto the steep cliffs near Lake Sevan in Armenia in this long-exposure portrait taken on August 9.


Summertime in the Northern Hemisphere is the best season to see our home galaxy, which looks like a band of hazy light stretching across the overhead sky.

9.Elephant's Trunk:Located 2,400 light-years from Earth, the Elephant Trunk nebula, captured here by the Mayall four-meter telescope at Kitt Peak National Observatory, is home to over 200 baby stars less than 100,000 years old.


Resembling a pachyderm's proboscis and head, this elongated cloud of gas and dust stretches nearly 20 light-years in length and is sculpted by the strong winds produced by the massive stars lying within.

10.Cosmic Forest:Like a cosmic tree, the Milky Way band of stars appears to rise out from an ancient pine tree forest at Cedar Breaks National Monument in southern Utah.


Among the longest-lived organisms, some of the twisted bristlecone trees - picture above in the foreground - are 5000 years old.

Because of the vast distance between these stars and Earth, some of the starlight seen in this picture was actually emitted years ago, when these trees were just saplings.

If you traveled one light-year, you would go almost six trillion miles (10 trillion kilometers).

11.Glowing Nurseries:A pair of star nurseries is lit up like cosmic neon signs, in this stunning new image by the European Southern Observatory's (ESO) Very Large Telescope in Chile.


These colorful glowing nebulae sit within the Large Magellanic Cloud - the largest satellite galaxy of the Milky Way some 160,000 light years from Earth.

The Large Magellanic Cloud is quite small compared to our Milky Way, with less than one tenth as much mass and spanning only 14,000 light-years, whereas the Milky Way stretches 100,000 light-years. Its irregular shape is likely a consequence of gravitational push and pull with the Milky Way and the Small Magellanic Cloud.

12.Death of a Star:This astronomical artwork depicts the violent death of a massive star in one of the most powerful type of explosions known in the universe - a gamma-ray burst (GRB).


In this illustration, a GRB illuminates clouds of interstellar gas in its host galaxy 12.7 billion light-years from Earth - in the so-called dark ages of the early Universe.

The flash of gamma rays - dubbed GRB 130606A - was detected by NASA's Swift spacecraft on June 6 and lasted for more than four minutes.

By analyzing the titanic blast and its high-energy emissions, researchers have learned about the chemistry of the surrounding galaxy, as it was only a billion years after the Big Bang, revealing that it contained only one-tenth of the heavy metals found in our solar system.

13.A Beautiful End:Resembling a face with a furry hood, the iconic Eskimo nebula is some 4,000 light-years from Earth. It shines bright in this composite image-released July 11-created from optical data taken by NASA's Hubble Space Telescope and the Chandra X-ray Observatory.


The colorful "parka" or outer shell of gas and dust is expanding at speeds of 31,000 miles (50,000 kilometers) an hour, and is lit up by the radiation blasting out from the remains of a dying red giant at the center of the nebula.

The part of the gas cloud glowing at a million degrees near the center appears pink to Chandra's x-ray eye, while Hubble's vision highlights intricate streamers of gas in the outer shell in red, green, and blue.

14.Newly discovered Pink Exoplanet: There is a pink exoplanet circling a star very much like our own, 57 light-years away from Earth. But its origins are a mystery. It's one of only five or six exoplanets whose presence has been directly imaged by a telescope, rather than inferred from observing stars. Other planets that have been directly imaged orbit much more massive stars. In that sense, [the pink planet] feels a bit closer to home.

An illustration of the magenta exoplanet... still glowing from the heat of its formation.


In a new study announcing the magenta gas giant, researchers were able to directly image this exoplanet using the Subaru telescope on Hawaii. The color of this blushing body indicates it has less cloud cover than other observed exoplanets, meaning researchers can peer even deeper into its atmosphere to divine its components.

If we could travel to this giant planet, we would see a world still glowing from the heat of its formation with a color reminiscent of a dark cherry blossom, a dull magenta.

At about 460°F (237°C), this gas giant probably wouldn't be a very pleasant place to visit. But researchers are still interested in this lightweight - it's one of the lowest-mass exoplanets found around a sun-like star using direct detection methods.

It orbits about 43 astronomical units (AUs) away from its parent star, much farther out than Neptune's orbit (30 AUs) around the sun.

The wide gulf between this exoplanet and its star puts it outside the conventional area expected for planet formation.

15.A bright fireball, View From the Mojave:a bright fireball is caught lighting up the starry skies above Teutonia Peak in the Mojave National Preserve in California on August 10, more than a day before the official maximum activity peak for the Perseid meteors.


Considered the most visually stunning meteor shower of 2013, the Perseids peak every August, when the Earth slams into a giant cloud of debris left behind by comet Swift-Tuttle along its orbit.

While most meteors zipping across the skies are no bigger than a grain of sand, fireballs like the one pictured above can be anywhere from the size of a grapefruit to the size of a basketball. The resulting high-speed impact causes unusually bright meteors, which astronomers call bolides, which can cast shadows and even a lingering smoke trail.

16.View From Japan:With the ghostly glow of the Milky Way in the background, a bright Perseid fireball appears to fall toward Japan's Mount Fuji in this stunning shot taken on August 11.


The meteor gradually changed color from green, yellow, to pink. Bright meteors known as fireballs produce vivid colors based on the chemical elements they contain. As the space rock gets vaporized traveling through the Earth's atmosphere at high speeds, sodium can produce flashes of bright yellow, while nickel and magnesium appear as green and blue-white respectively. 

17.View From Quebec:On August 10, 2013, at 3 a.m. the sky was filled with auroras, and then a nice shooting star appeared zipping across a sky painted green by northern lights in James Bay, Quebec, Canada. 


A giant cloud of energized particles was flung off the sun on August 7, which slammed into Earth's magnetic field on August 10, causing auroras to erupt across many northern latitude countries. 

A chance to see auroras is irresistible. Witnessing the auroras is so special and surreal. Here's a picture of the northern lights glowing over the Lofoten Islands, Norway:


The Lofoten Islands, in Norway's far north, are a peninsula-like chain of wild, craggy shards jutting into the Norwegian Sea above the Arctic Circle.

18. Faint comet pairs with galaxy:After nightfall on Wednesday, July 24, medium-sized telescope users got a parting view of comet PanSTARRS gliding by the grand spiral galaxy known as the Pinwheel - or Messier 101 - in the Ursa Major [Kaal Purusha] constellation. The comet though faded considerably to 11th magnitude (since its close approach back in March) could still be followed with at least a 6-inch telescope as it headed back to the outer solar system.

The Pinwheel galaxy near the Big Dipper (also known as the Plough or the Saptarishi - an asterism of seven stars), pairs up with fading comet PanSTARRS:


[The Plough, as we know, is also associated with agriculture, while Saptarishi also stands for the seven enlightened sages who arrived on earth. They were the progenitors of various groups of humans... who later on, due to a variety of factors, branched out. These were: Sura/Deva, Asura/Assyrians (an independent group arising out of the Deva clan), Nag (serpent-worshiping + totem; one of their prominent kings/chiefs, Vasuki, shielded the baby Krishna during Vasudev's journey to Gokul), Suparna (displayed eagle or falcon totem and/or headgear), Sakuna (displayed vulture totem and/or headgear), Gandharva (an offshoot of the Devas), and so on. The Saptarishi also shared their wisdom and knowledge with humanity... who in turn imbibed from them. No wonder our ancients were way ahead of us vis-à-vis knowledge, technology, literature, wisdom, values, principles, et al.

The combination of Saptarishi differs in each maha-yuga (or four yug cycle, viz Krita/Sat/Satya Yug, Treta Yug, Dvapar Yug and Kali Yug). There are innumerable universes, with one Brahmā in each of them. There are fourteen Manus who are prominent within this universe, each overseeing a manvantara or manuvantara. "Manu" is a title for the one who rules a manvantara. Each "Manu" is endowed with great knowledge and wisdom. [The word "Manav", signifying human or humanity, comes from "Manu". Manav = human, mankind; antara = period, cycle.] Each kalpa(1,000 maha-yugas) is reigned over/overseen by a succession of 14 Manus, and the reign of each Manu is called a "manvantara". A single manvantara is approximately 71 maha-yugas. Manusmriti or rules of Manu texts are ascribed to Yajña (as Svāyambhuva Manu) - the first Manu. (However, since several of our ancient texts have been tweaked, embellished and even rewritten, we cannot rule out the same for these texts too).

The name "Bharatadesam" means, the 'Land of Bharat' or the 'Land of the Bharatas'. Bharata means "the cherished", hence, Bharatavarsha is the land of Bharata; it is the bhoomi of the Bharatas or "cherished land". "Bharatadesam" is also known as "Bharatavarsha", which literally means the continent ('varsha'; Sanskrit) that is dedicated ('rata') to light, wisdom ('bha'). In other words, the Land of Enlightened Wisdom.] 

Lying face on and appearing as wide as a full moon, M 101 (Messier 101) is a bit challenging to find with binoculars because its spiral arms are so diffuse, but is still an easy 8th magnitude oval glow for at least a 4-inch telescope.

Look northwest for a hanging Big Dipper with M 101 just above it's last two handle stars. The two handle stars and M 101 should form a triangle.

PanSTARRS and the Pinwheel appeared to be only 5 degrees apart - equal to the width of a fist at arm's length. Their proximity in the sky, however, was just an optical illusion because PanSTARRS lies some 276 million miles (445 million kilometers) from Earth, while the galaxy is a whopping 26 million light years distant.

Look northwest after dark for the Big Dipper, hanging diagonally. Its handle is on the upper left. Follow the curve of the handle on around leftward, for a little more than a Dipper-length, to land on bright Arcturus in the west. 


19. The icy interloper, the 'comet of the century'- comet ISON:Stargazers were very excited when astronomers calculated the comet's orbit. They realized it would be skimming the sun's surface by only 700,000 miles (1.1 million kilometers) on November 28, 2013. But continual observations by both professional and amateur telescopes, including Hubble, have since shown that the comet has exhibited a constant brightness with no indication of a brightness increase tendency. For now, however, the comet is still currently out between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter, hurtling towards the Sun at 48,000 miles (77,000 kilometers) an hour. The latest infrared views from NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope - taken in June - shows ISON's nucleus spewing out a healthy 186,000-mile-long (299,000-kilometer-long) tail of carbon dioxide and dust as it melts due to the sun's heat. [ISON is considered a "sungrazer," meaning that it will pass very close to the sun when it gets into the inner solar system in November 2013.]

Will comet ISON blossom into an unaided-eye comet, sporting a long, beautiful tail across the sky?

Well, comets are famously unpredictable and can surprise even experts.

But if astronomers' early predictions hold true, Nov-Dec 2013 may hold a glowing gift for stargazers - a super-bright comet. Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON) seems to be following the path of the Great Comet of 1680, considered one of the most spectacular ever seen from Earth.

A comet like this only comes along once or twice a century say experts. "Sungrazing comets are common. Fresh-from-the-Oort-cloud comets are common. Comets detected more than six times farther out than the Earth's orbit? Not so much. The combination of all three is very rare," said comet veteran Mike A'Hearn of the University of Maryland.

Astronomers agree that ISON will be an extraordinary, cliffhanger of an event. "No comet has ever disappointed me, a lot of comets have surprised me," said A'Hearn.

"ISON is a great experiment to see all the factors that influence sungrazing survival," said Matthew Knight of the Lowell Observatory. There will be a huge amount of data to learn from. It will be a treasure-trove of new science.

Regardless of how the comet behaves, this is becoming sort of a Woodstock of space astronomy. There is an armada of spacecraft position near the sun or at other planets that will be ready to follow the comet along every step of its sunward plunge. Add to that a powerful new generation of ground base observatories, and an army of dedicated amateur astronomers with sophisticated instruments for monitoring the comet.

Comet C/ISON was imaged with the Hubble Space telescope on April 10 using the Wide Field Camera 3, when the comet was 394 million miles from Earth:


Comet ISON month-by-month in late 2013:

September and October 2013. Comet ISON will brighten as the months pass. In September and October, amateur astronomers will surely be trying to pick it up. The comet will be sweeping in front of the constellation Leo then. It'll pass first near Leo's brightest star Regulus, then near the planet Mars. Finder charts for Comet ISON for Septemberand October. [Regulus marks the heart of Leo, the lion... and lies 78 light years away. A hot blue-white star, it is about 3.5 times larger than our Sun and, at 300 million years old, is an adolescent when it comes to star lifetimes.]

November 2013. Comet ISON will get brighter still throughout November as it nears its late November perihelion (closest point to our sun). Some comet experts expect the comet to reach visibility to the unaided eye about three weeks before the November 28 perihelion date. 

Comet ISON will come within 800,000 miles (1.2 million km) of our sun's surface on November 28. That's over 100 times closer to the sun than Earth. This close pass to the sun might cause Comet ISON to break to pieces, and, if that happens, the comet is likely to fizzle. Or ISON might emerge from perihelion bright enough to see with the eye, with a comet tail. Comets are famously unpredictable, so there's just no telling, at this point, how bright it will get. 

In November, ISON will pass very close to the bright star Spica and the planet Saturn, both in the constellation Virgo. These bright stars might help you find the comet. There has been some mention that Comet ISON could become a daylight object, briefly. Remember, though, at perihelion, Comet ISON will appear close to the sun on the sky's dome (only 4.4° north of the sun on November 28). Although the comet will be bright, it's likely that only experts who know how to look near the sun, while blocking the sun's glare, will see it. November finder charts for Comet ISON here.

December 2013. This is likely to be the best month to see Comet ISON, assuming it has survived its close pass near the sun intact. The comet will be visible both in the evening sky after sunset and in the morning sky before sunrise. As ISON's distance from the sun increases, it'll grow dimmer. The crescendo of the apparition will likely occur between December 10th and 14th, when the comet will be best seen just before dawn after the moon sets. Although little or perhaps nothing of the head will remain, the huge tail will loom in the northeastern sky. Almost evenly illuminated over its length, this rapidly fading appendage could [span] almost a quarter of the heavens as seen under good, dark observing conditions.

People all over Earth will be able to see it, but it'll be best seen from the Northern Hemisphere as 2013 draws to a close. December finder charts for Comet ISON here.

Comet ISON on the morning of December 10, 2013. [Please note: this is only a representation, and the comet will undoubtedly look much different to the images shown here. In all likelihood the tail will be curved due to the speed of the comet around the Sun.] View Looking East on the morning (pre-dawn) of the 10th of December 2013, 05.00h: 


Comet ISON will be visible in both the morning and evening sky in December 2013 (image: representation). View Looking West on the evening of the 18th of December 2013, 16.00h:


If these predictions are correct? WOW!!! 

Let's just keep those fingers crossed. 

January 2014. Will ISON still be visible to the eye? Hopefully. Only time will tell. On January 8, 2014, the comet will lie only 2° from Polaris (Cynosure, Sanskrit dhruva tāra "fixed star") - the North Star or the Pole Star. And here's something else that's fun. On January 14-15, 2014, after the comet itself has passed but when Earth is sweeping near the comet's orbit, it might produce a meteor shower, or at least some beautiful night-shining or noctilucent clouds.

So, one thing is for sure, ISON will be a sungrazer in just a few months. And thanks to an armada of telescopes on Earth and in space trained on this cosmic event, we will be witness to a rare spectacle.

The Good Little Ceylonese Girl by Ashok Ferry

$
0
0


After Colpetty People (2003) come The Good Little Ceylonese Girl (2006),Ashok Ferry's second collection, and his own take on Sri Lankan life (at home and abroad). Witty, frank, conversational, slightly dark, full of funny-yet-insightful candour, tongue-in-cheek even, it conveys the great amount of social diversity that exists in Sri Lanka in all its myriad shades.

Playfully provocative Ferry pokes fun at the Lankan elite and their pretenses and foibles... in Lankan English. With his good-humoured writing, local flavour and clever turns of phrases, Ferry serves up almost the right mix of sarcasm and humour that gets their point across yet does not offend. What's more... he even pokes fun at himself. Ferry makes a couple of appearances in this collection. For example, in 'Maleeshya', he appears as Mr. Arishtabotale Pereira, attending his own funeral, to be covered in the very popular high-society magazine, Shuh!! Magazine, so named to differentiate it from its ugly European elder sister, Shah!! Magazine.

Sample this:

"A grey-haired man got out. He saw Maleeshya and immediately sucked in his stomach.
'Ko hearse?' she asked him.
The man looked behind him to see if there was a cortege following. There wasn't.
'And who are you?' asked Maleeshya, switching languages.
The man gave her a charming smile. He had slightly discoloured teeth. 'I'm the author,' he replied proudly.
'You can't be! You're dead.'
He straightened up. (There was not much straightening to do, he was quite short.)"

Conversation between Mrs. Arishtabotale Pereira and Maleeshya (the editor of Shuh!! Magazine):

'Isn't it wonderful?' she beamed. 'He's alive and well!'

'No, it isn't,' said Maleeshya. She could be quite short with people, though these people were short enough already. 'The flowers are paid for, the caterers are setting up the mala bathaon the back verandah. You promised me a funeral.'

Ferry's insightful candour runs throughout this collection... and makes their point succinctly and clearly. Here are a few instances:

From:Pig:

Two childhood sweethearts, in time-honoured Sri Lankan tradition, are married off to other people. Nineteen years of clandestine meetings (for one or two days every year - the week before Christmas) culminate in another chance of marriage. Perhaps time does separate.

'In Sri Lanka, the people amongst whom you live, the people with whom you went to school, the people in whose houses you ate, whose jokes you shared - these were not the people you married. ...But if the people with whom you chose to associate were the very ones you could not marry, then the ones you did marry were quite often people with whom you wouldn't dream of associating if you had any choice in the matter.'

From:The Jackfruit:

'An Asian without a visa was guaranteed trouble-free: he did what he was told, he was at your beck and call. He was your creature.'

From: The Indians Are Coming:

I, on the other hand, get to play intellectual parts. Like policemen. The high point of mybrilliant career was when I had to lead two thousand people at Maradana Railway Station in a big budget extravaganza. I got up on the podium, shook my fist at the camera, and shouted: 'Gandhi-ji's in the bath!'

And two thousand people roared after me, 'Gandhi-ji's in the bath!' (The actual words were Gandhi-ji zindabad! But I found my version more effective.) This five-minute scene took three days to film, naturally. Well, they released the film at Toronto the other day, and I found they had cut me out almost completely. Though there's this very good shot of the back of my head, so I mustn't complain.

From:Dust:

Father Cruz had read somewhere of the tourist who visited St. Mark's in Venice, and, looking at the sloping floors and thousand-year-old mosaics, had said: 'What this place needs is a level floor and a darned good coat of whitewash.'

Long years and many miles away, Colombo's Father Cruz attempts to rescue a church from parishioners who like to put their donations where others can see them - with plaques to announce their charity. 

'Father Cruz moved slowly from one row to the next. He noticed there was woodworm in the last two rows. The pews would have to be replaced. It was not that the parish was poor; there were more than enough people willing to donate new pews, new floors, new everything. Even stained glass for the windows in the tower. Up till now he had said to each of them: Thank you for your kind offer, but this parish has more pressing needs. He explained to them there were children who needed school uniforms, there were homeless people who had to be fed. But rich parishioners were strangely unwilling to donate to such insubstantial causes. They preferred to put their money where they could see it, or more to the point, where others could see it: in a shiny granite floor or a blazing stained-glass window, preferably with a plaque affixed bearing their name.'

As you can see, Ferry loses no opportunity to poke fun at the elite and their pretenses.

Ferry writes about Sri Lanka and its people, wherever they roam. He writes of the Sri Lankan Diaspora, who seem not to notice that their country has changed in their absence. He writes of the West's effect on Sri Lankans, of its 'turning them into caricatures, unmistakably genuine but far from the real thing'. As you laugh, you are left with nostalgia for a bygone Sri Lanka and Sri Lankans who might have been.

Our Sri Lankan narrator visits his friend Joe in Italy where Joe attends a course in higher studies in women. But Italians - much like today's residents of Colombo - live at home till marriage, death, and sometimes even beyond. A hen and chicken affair of fake fiancés and phony engagements ensues. [Fidanza to Fidanzata]

There's mention of elephant hair bracelets, shark's teeth necklaces and lion's claw earrings. There are enormous ostrich eggs, speckled and shiny, on people's coffee tables. There's Italo, the small purple baby ostrich - no more than two feet high, craning its dusty neck to reach the shoe flowers on the bushes. There are panettones, the fruit-filled Milanese bread, that made their appearance in Mogadiscio one festive season like a flock of gold-and-silver-coloured birds, and everyone gave everyone else one. 'They were nothing like as bad as the ones you got back then: dry and papery, hard to chew, impossible to swallow. Once you got a piece in your mouth all human conversation ceased. It was a surprisingly useful way of silencing your more talkative guests.'

There's Pizza and vadai. There's spaghetti and meat sauce. There's yellow rice and chicken curry. There's karavila. There's curried skins of the loofah, chopped fine with chilli and garlic. There's fried leaves of the murungacrisp like seaweed. All esoteric village dishes... but no mention of Lunu Miris or katta sambole (fish pickle) anywhere

This collection of seventeen short stories is many-layered and enormously wide-ranging: from Sri Lankans working abroad (in England and Africa), to footloose Italians, fading Maharajahs, personal space, human bonding, fortune-tellers and the tsunami, to issues of lesbianism, adultery, cronyism, and of course small-mindedness, facades and elitism. They vary widely in their length too. The shorter ones make for a better read. The longer ones tend to meander a bit. And as is the case with all short story collections, not all of them impress; some are a tad underwhelming. However, the title story is quite engaging. All in all, The Good Little Ceylonese Girl is like a montage of emotions, experiences, insights and observations... on Sri Lankans (both resident and roaming). Much like random brush strokes on canvas. Clearly, the island that lies like a little emerald on the waters of the Indian Ocean has much to offer to the world of literature. 

However, yet again, a glossary of terms is missing-in-action. So the meaning of various Sri Lankan words, terms and references may be lost on some readers.

That said... Ferry's writing, given its distinct Sri Lankan flavour, does take some getting used to. If one is familiar with Sri Lankan society, then his observations and innuendos would be instantly recognizable and amusing, but if one is a stranger to that country and culture, then much of the fun, and at least some of the amusing insinuations and associations, may be lost on the lay reader. And that would surely interfere/dilute the flavour, thereby altering the taste. Result? The fiction-loving epicurean in you might feel less than satiated. However, for those familiar with the Sri Lankan way-of-life... it will be a surprisingly breezy read, a thoroughly enjoyable one at that, due to its eclectic mix. Lunu Miris or no Lunu Miris.

The production value of the book is good. I am discounting the editing errors, putting it down to Ferry's writing style and Sri Lankan English. The book jacket cover is colourful; it depicts a scene from the title story: Suneeta aka'The Good Little Ceylonese Girl' cuddling Italo, the small purple baby ostrich. Umm, if Ferry can put together his stories... complete with their unique mix of multifaceted humour, irony and pun in his signature gently snarky non-take-no-prisoners style, in a slightly more watertight manner, it will increase the joy quotient. Readers' joy, that is.  

I am going with a slightly generous 3/5 for Ashok Ferry's The Good Little Ceylonese Girl. Ferry isn't a run-of-the-mill author and his commitment towards advancing Sri Lankan literature in English is evident. [Incidentally, both Colpetty People and The Good Little Ceylonese Girl were short-listed for the Gratiaen Prize - Sri Lanka's premier literary award.]


Details of the book:The Good Little Ceylonese Girl/ Author: Ashok Ferry/ Publisher: Vintage Books, an imprint of Random House India/ Binding: Paperback/ Publishing Date: 2012/ Genre: Fiction/ ISBN: 978-8-184-00307-9/ ISBN-13: 9788184003079/ Pages: approx 200 with cover/ Price: INR 299.

Picture:The book jacket cover of The Good Little Ceylonese Girl. Courtesy: link.

Shubho Janmashtami !!

$
0
0


|| karmaṇy evādhikāras te
mā phaleṣu kadācana
mā karma-phala-hetur bhūr
mā te sańgo 'stv akarmaṇi ||

Do your duty to the best of your ability. Overcome your limitations. Concentrate on your convergences. Do not highlight your divergences/differences. Shun lethargy. Overcome inertia. Be positive. Never lose hope.



|| ॐ नमो भगवते वासुदेवाय नम: ||

|| Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya Namah ||

Om, Śrī Kṛṣṇa, O Vasudeva, O all-pervading Eternal Spirit, I offer my respectful obeisance unto You.


I bow to the Lord who is Jagad-Guruh - the Preceptor of the universe. I bow to the gurutamah: The greatest teacher and guide.

I bow in reverence to the Universal Guruh, the primeval Guruh, and the Satguruh. I bow to Yogeshwara, the Lord of the Yogis.

[This seal depicts that Universal Guruh - the Jagad-Guruh and Satguruh: the Supreme Parama-hamsah, the Yogi (the Supreme Master, since all wisdom and knowledge emanates from Him.) 

It is a square seal depicting a male deity with three faces, seated in yogic position on a throne, wearing bangles on both arms and an elaborate headdress. Five symbols of the Indus script appear on either side of the headdress, which is made of two outward projecting curved horns, with two upward projecting points. A single branch with three peepal leaves rises from the middle of the headdress.

Seven bangles are depicted on the left arm and six on the right, with the hands resting on the knees. The heels are pressed together and the feet project beyond the edge of the throne. The feet of the throne are carved with the hoof of a bovine as is seen on the bull and unicorn seals. The seal may not have been fired, but the stone is very hard. A grooved and perforated boss is present on the back of the seal.
 


The three faces = the three loka (Trilok) or the three worlds (tri-bhUvan). Hence the seated Yogi is none other than the Lord of the three worlds: the 'tribhUvaneshvar', the Trilok Sundar: Purushottam Satya (who is also the cosmic Satyam-Shivam-Sundaram) ~ Lord Narayan. The elaborate headdress is made of two outward projecting curved horns, with two upward projecting points: 'coz Narayan/Krishna is also the Supreme Bull (vrisha uttamam) or Lord ofDharma. He is Dharma (justice and duty, actions that benefit society) personified. [Dharma is generally symbolized in Sanaatan Dharmic thought by the bull, vrishabha. It does not refer to a bovine creature per se. *Do also refer to the Unicorn seal and the three-head-seal below.] Five symbols of the Indus script that appear on either side of the headdress: probably this was how Vishnu or Krsna was written in the Indus script (Hieroglyphs). The horned headdress has a branch with three prongs or peepal leaves emerging from the center. In the Srimad Bhagavad Gita (Chapter 10, Verse: 26), Shri Krishna describes the glory of the peepal tree thus:

|| aśvatthaḥ sarva-vṛkṣāṇāḿ || ~ among trees, I am the peepal (ashvattha)

This Indus seal depicts Shri Vishnu/Krishna as the peepal tree. || aśvatthaḥ sarva-vṛkṣāṇāḿ || ~ among trees, I am the peepal (ashvattha).

The peepal tree (the Bodhi tree/the 'tree of enlightenment') or the transpersonal World Tree is the personification of Shri Vishnu/Keshav/Narayan/Hari. The Bodhi tree, the Tree of Enlightenment, is also the symbol of (the 9th Vishnu) Shri Gautam Buddh's message in general (since he had overcome his human boundaries and become one with the world spirit.) The holy fig tree therefore, holds a very important place in Indian civilization (be it with respect to faith, medicinal and social point of views), and hence is worthy of worship. It is the tree of eternal life. The ashvatthasymbolizes the continuity of life because the tree itself lives and grows for hundreds of years. The heart-shaped leaves on long, thin stems shimmer easily in a light breeze. This sacred tree stands for wisdom, knowledge, enlightenment, happiness, prosperity, peace, longevity and good luck. Every peepal tree is a reservoir of oxygen. People who stay near it have a plentiful supply of oxygen. This majestic tree gives ample shade to humans and animals alike. It is also home to a lot of birds and insects. The holy fig tree has medicinal properties as well.

Ashvatha literally means, "Where horses stood" (ashva + tha). In Sanskrit, this tree is known as Ashvattha, Bodhivriksha and Plaksha. This tree represents the entire cosmos: 'Shva' in Sanskrit means tomorrow, 'a' indicates negation, and 'tha' means one that stands or remains. Hence, Ashvatha can indicate: "One which does not remain the same tomorrow", or the universe itself. The Ashvatha tree is quite remarkable because it grows both upwards as well as vice versa. The branches themselves morph into roots, so even if the original tree decays and perishes, its branches underneath are young and continue to enclose the parent. This eternal life of the Peepal tree has inspired many Indian philosophers; this tree has its own symbolic meaning of enlightenment and peace... all of which has enriched Sanaatan Dharma. In the Upanishads, the fruit of the peepal is thus used as an example to explain the difference between the body (i.e. the individual soul: the Jiva-aatma) and the soul (i.e. the supersoul: the Param-aatma). The body (the Jiva-aatma) is like the fruit which, being outside, feels and enjoys things, while the soul (the Param-aatma) is like the seed, which is inside and therefore witnesses things. Tree of Roots above; branches below; this Ashvattha is reputed to be imperishable; whose leaves are the Vedas; One who knows this is a knower of all the vedas. [Kathopanishad and the Srimad Bhagavad Gita.] 

... And it was beneath this very tree that Shri Krishna was resting when the vyadh/hunter (Jara) unknowingly hit him with his arrow (mistaking him for a deer). On finding out (who he has hit), he begs and pleads to be forgiven. But Krishna only smiles, blesses him and departs. ['Coz with His task already accomplished, the mortal coil had to go... for Him to return to Vaikunth-loka. And so, while Jara continued to grieve over the empty shell (the discarded outer coil) Krishna reaches Vaikunth-loka in a matter of seconds.] Thus, the midnight of 18th February 3102 (in the proleptic Julian calendar) heralded the advent of Kaliyug. [Kali does not mean demon. Kali means bud. Only at the end of Kaliyug when the metaphoric bud/flower withers away will the 'Iron Age' of Kaliyug be at its peak.]




Probably the most common design on the Indus seals is the swastika. It occurs in dozens of seals and is sometimes aligned with various animals like the elephant. This symbol wards off negativities. It represents the cosmic spinning vortex. The right-handed swastika symbol originated in ancient India and is the symbol of the mighty River Sarasvati as well as the Sindhu-Sarasvati Sabhyata/Civilization - one of the oldest civilizations of the world [and who knows whether many many millenniums ago this land was the cradle of civilization or not.] In Sanaatan Dharma, the swastika represents the Universe in our own spiral galaxy in the forefinger of Shri Vishnu. This carries most significance in establishing the creation of the Universe and the arms as 'kaalah' or time. [Also, the chakra/disc on Lord Narayan's forefinger probably indicates the galaxies; maybe all galaxies (including the Milky Way/Aakash Ganga) were disc-shaped in the beginning... and gradually opened up to assume a spiral form.]

[The mighty River Indus is Sindhu in Sanskrit.

In Old Persian... the 'S' for Sindhu becomes 'H' (due to lack of phonetics). Therefore: the Vedic Sapta Sindhavaḥ or Sapta Sindhu becomes Hapta HAndu (both terms meaning "seven rivers").

The ancient Persians called the people living around the river Indus and to the east of the River Indus as: Hindu.

Thus, 'Hindu' is derived from 'HAndu', which in turn is derived from 'Sindhu'. 

Note: The 'Sapta Sindhu' refers to the rivers SarasvatI, Sutudri or Satadru or SuturI (Sutlej), VipASa (Beas), AsiknI/Ashkini/Chandrabhaga/Iskmati(Chenab), ParuSNI (Ravi), VitastA (Jhelum) and Sindhu (Indus). Among these, the SarasvatI and the Sindhu were the most sacred. The once-mighty River Indus, it is said, originates from the mouth of a lion (Senge Khabab or "Lion's Mouth")- a perennial spring - in Manas Sarovar, in Tibet. Thus, it is also called Sengge Tsangpo or Lion River. This river is a common lifeline, and symbolically binds the people of more than one nation. Few rivers in the world flow through as stunning a landscape as the Sindhu/River Indus. It flows through plains, villages, hamlets and towns, as well as by valleys, gorges and peaks of countless hues. As for the River Sarasvati, it contains the word "saras", indicating the Saras Crane. Therefore, this now lost river probably emerged from a mountain rock/snout that resembled the beak of a Saras Crane. PS: Both extremely erudite and mellifluous languages, the Old Persian-Sanskrit connection go back a long way. The Sanskrit 'Asva' (horse) is 'Asp' in Persian. The Sanskrit 'sthan' (meaning: land or place) is 'stan' in Persian. 'Namaz' is 'Namah' or 'Naman' in Sanskrit, and both mean the same: to pay obeisance, or to bow and pray. (The word nama ḥ does not indicate mere physical obeisance, but total surrender of oneself, taking refuge in the Almighty through body, mind and soul/spirit.)]



The term Swastika has been derived from the Sanskrit word "Svastika", which means well-being: "SU" means "good" or "auspicious,""ASTI" means "to be," and "KA" as a suffix. The swastika literally means, "to be good". Alternatively: "swa" is "higher self", "asti" meaning "being", and "ka" as a suffix, so the translation can be interpreted as: "being with higher self". Suasti thus means "well-being." The suffix -ka either forms a diminutive or intensifies the verbal meaning, and suastika might thus be translated literally as "that which is associated with well-being," corresponding to "lucky charm" or "thing that is auspicious." Thus swastikameans any lucky or auspicious object, and in particular a mark made on persons and things to denote auspiciousness, good luck or well-being. Shri Vishnu is also known as svasti: One who is the source of all auspiciousness.

The most traditional form of the swastika's symbolization in Sanaatan Dharma is that the symbol represents the purusharthas (representative of the cosmic energy/spirit - the Purusha): dharma (that which makes a human a human), artha (wealth), kama (desire), and moksha (liberation). All four are needed for a full life. However, two (artha and kama) are limited and can only give limited joy. They are the two closed arms of the swastika. The other two are unlimited and are the open arms of the swastika.

Swastika is considered to be a mark of auspiciousness and good fortune. Red Swastika is the sign of Sanaatan Dharma; it depicts a cross with four arms of equal lengths. The end of each of the arms is bent at a right angle. At times, dots are also added between the arms. The right-facing swastika (Sanskrit: Svastika) in the decorative form, used to evoke sacred force. [Shri Ganesh has the Swastika on his palm. The swastika is at times considered a symbolic representation of Shri Ganesh (Vignesh or Vighna-Vinashak - the remover of obstacles) and is hence offered first offerings in every puja. The swastika is made with red vermilion (prepared with natural ingredients) during rituals.]

The Swastika is a symbol of good fortune in Buddhism. It represents the footprints and heart of Bhagavan Shri Gautam Buddh. Thus, it is considered to be very holy and extensively brought to use by Buddhists. In fact, in all the images of Shri Gautam Buddh, you'll find the Swastik imprinted on his chest, palms and feet. In Jainism, Swastika represents the Seventh Jina, more popularly known as the Tirthankara Suparsva. It is one of the most prominent auspicious symbols of the present era. In the cultural traditions of Svetambar Jains, Swastika is one of the main symbols of the ashta-mangalas. [The Rishabha Avatar is also the first 'Tirthankara'.]
 

  
Let me not pray to be sheltered from dangers
but to be fearless in facing them.

Let me not beg for the stilling of my pain
but for the heart to conquer it.

Let me not look for allies in life's battlefield
but to my own strength.

Let me not crave in anxious fear to be saved
but hope for the patience to win my freedom.

Grant that I may not be a coward,
feeling Your mercy in my success alone;

But let me find the grasp of Your hand in my failure.

                                                     ~ Gurudev Rabindranath Tagore [1916]


As per the proleptic Julian calendar, Krishna's date of birth is July 21, 3228 BC. [Though some accounts say: 3227 BC.] 



The Nag was a serpent-worshiping clan. Probably they displayed a serpent totem/insignia too. One of their prominent king/chieftain, Vasuki, shielded the baby Krishna (from inclement weather) during Vasudev's journey to Gokul. However, later translators misinterpreted this... thereby turning Vasuki into a gigantic serpent. He was very much human!

Krishna (also: Krishn, Krshn, Krsna) - the "all-attractive one" - was born under the Rohini nakshatra, in the month of Bhadrapada, on the 8th day of the waning moon at midnight. Hence, the annual commemoration of the birth of this magnificent avatar, Krishna Janmashtami (kṛṣṇa janmāṣṭami), also known as: Krishnashtami, Saatam Aatham, Gokulashtami, Ashtami Rohini, Srikrishna Jayanti, Sree Jayanti or sometimes merely as Janmashtami... is celebrated on the eighth day (Ashtami) of the Krishna Paksha (dark fortnight) of the month of Shraavan (August-September).



In 2013: Krishna Janmashtami falls on August 28. Today is August 28. Today is the birthday of Shri Krishna - the magnificent Maha Avatar, Lord Narayan's Purna avatar - one in whom divinity is manifested fully (as is also depicted in this Indus seal; the two unicorns represent Shri Hari Vishnu and Sri Krishn respectively. Do refer to the Unicorn Seal below to know more about the symbolism behind the unicorn.) The peepal tree (the Bodhi tree/the 'tree of enlightenment') or the transpersonal World Tree is the personification of Shri Vishnu/Keshav/Narayan/Hari: || aśvatthaḥ sarva-vṛkṣāṇāḿ || ~ among trees, I am the peepal (ashvattha).

|| krishnas tu bhagavan svayam ||

Shubho Janmashtami.

Robi Thakur rightly said: "aamare tumi ashesh korechho, amon-i leela tabo" (tr. Thou hast made me endless, such is thy pleasure/leela).

On this joyous occasion, May the Lord touch each of our hearts.

|| Tumi nirmalo karo mangalo kare, molino marmo muchhaaye,
Tabo punnyo-kiran diye jaak mor moho-kalima ghuchaye ||


Purify me with your virtues, wiping off the vices of our hearts,
Let your auspicious effulgence take away the darkness and greed of our souls.




A quote from Swami Vivekananda's speech (Welcome Address - Chicago, Sept 11, 1893) - in response to the warm and cordial welcome he received:

"As the different streams having their sources in different places all mingle their water in the sea, so, O Lord, the different paths which men take through different tendencies, various though they appear, crooked or straight, all lead to Thee."

No wonder then, that in the current maha-yuga (the four-yug cycle: Krita/Sat/Satya Yug, Treta Yug, Dvapar Yug and Kali Yug) the ninth avatar, Bhagavan Shri Gautam Buddh, is not exclusive to any faith, while the 10th Maha Avatar (great incarnation), the Kalki-avatar, too appears to be part of many faiths.

['Avatar' means: descent and refers to a descent of the divine into earthly form. Avatar comes from the Sanskrit avatirna: "manifest/descent from the Lord."]

A wonderful verse in the Srimad Bhagavad Geeta says: "Whosoever comes to Me, through whatsoever form, I reach him; all men are struggling through paths which in the end lead to me."



|| Hari Om Tat Sat ||

The seen (manifested/vyaktah/Saakar Brahmn) and the unseen (unmanifested/avyaktah/Niraakar Brahmn) are both one.

Lord Hari/Narayan is the Supreme Being, the Kaal Purush. He is Shaashvata, He is Sanaatana - Eternal. He is Satyah, the Ultimate Truth. He is Lord of Creation. He is the Supreme Creator [Brahmn, the motive power behind the mathematically precise universes.] He is the Supreme Absolute Truth [ParaBrahmn]

Thou art the sky, and thou art the nest as well.

Glory be to Thee.

HA= sky
RA= fire
I= energy
HARI = effulgent omnipresent omnipotent
omniconscient cosmic energy. [Hari also means: green, The Lord of Nature. (As for Hari-Hara: "Hara" also means green.) He is Kshiteeshah: The Lord of the earth.]

OM or AUM: Refers to the Supreme Infinite Spirit or Being, the Adi Purusha ~ Shri Hari Vishnu. OM represents the Shabda Brahmn. It is the primeval sound - pranavah/Omkara/pranava naad, the sound of the universe itself. The uttering of the sacred and mystical OM is called Onkar or Omkar. It is the sound of the origination and dissolution of the universe. The past, present, future and all that transcends time are all included in this sound. Lord Narayan is the personification/manifestation (Omswaroop) of OM or AUM. Thus, He is Hariom. He is Omprakash - light of OM, light of the world.

TAT = that. Refers to the omnipresent, omnipotent, omniconscient Parabrahman Parameshvarah. [Parabrahmn = Absolute. Parameshvarah = the Supreme Being, the Supreme Lord, the Almighty Lord (prabhuh). Omniconscient (sarvajno) = possessing all wisdom.]

SAT= truth. Parabrahmn is beyond truth and untruth. Yet what is fundamentally true is Parabrahmn.

The Kaal Purush is beyond time. The Kaal Purush is puraatanah: He who was even before time. [Kaal or Kaalah = Time. Purush/Purusha = Cosmic Energy.] 

The Almighty - the Viraat Purush, the Cosmic Being, or the Primordial Being... is the motive power behind the mathematically precise universes.



 
Every thing is consumed by time except the Viraat-Purush. He is eternal-uncreated. [Viraat = very big, unlimited, infinite. So much so that the human mind can never fully comprehend Him. He is Achintya, inscrutable, an enigma. And shall remain so, always.
In His "Vishwaroop" (His Universal form) He incorporates everything that is a part of the entire universe, whether seen or unseen, animate or inanimate, tangible or intangible. The universes are therefore His 'body'. And, He is also the motive power and guiding spirit behind the mathematically precise universes.

In this Universal Form (Vishwaroop) of the Lord, Arjun could see the entire cosmos. Eternity manifests itself in endless ways on endless planes of existence and from head to toe Arjun saw the 'body' of Lord Krishna encompassing 14 different planetary dimensions. ~ Let us try to understand what the fourteen planetary systems or Lokas refer to... and what is their geographical and spatial arrangement. ~ Each Universe is shaped like an egg (Brahmand) and within it exist the three levels of Lokas (Urdha Lokas/Higher Planets/Abodes; Madhya Lokas/Middle Planets; and Adho-Lokas/Lower Realms). There are 14 planetary systems comprising the three Lokas and below them exist the 28 different Hells (Hellish Planets/Narak-Loka - where retribution is rendered by Dharmaraj Yamaraj and team... against sins/paap or prarabda karm (bad/negative karm) committed by various Beings.)] ~ There are fourteen Manu who are prominent within this universe, each overseeing a "manvantara" or "manuvantara". "Manu" is a title for the one who rules a manvantara. Each "Manu" is endowed with great knowledge and wisdom. A Manvantara is equal to seventy-one times the number of years contained in the four Yugas (Sat/Satya/Krita, Treta, Dvapar and Kaliyug), with some additional years: this is the duration of each Manu, the (attendant) divinities (Indra, etc), and the rest. (We have discussed the Manu-s in some detail - later in this post; please do look it up - to know more.) Note: The Adho-Lokas or Lower Realms (also known as Bilva-svarga) are not to be mistaken for the Hellish Planets/Narak-Loka. The former are inhabited by different beings; technologically much more advanced than us (earthlings and/or inhabitants of the Middle Planets/Madhya-Lokas); these being live longer, are great architects and are more materially opulent. However, these Adho-Lokas or Lower Realms are (very likely) lit up by artificial lighting, and not by the rays of the sun. Also, the inhabitants of these planets (known as Daityas, Danavas, Asuras and Nagas) are attached to extreme material enjoyment; they are spiritually very low (unlike the inhabitants of the Urdha Lokas/Higher Planets/Abodes [including Svarga-Loka] - who are higher spiritual beings.) [The inhabitants of the Urdha Lokas/Higher Planets/Abodes are extremely intelligent beings, far more advanced - technologically, spiritually as well as w.r.t intellect and knowledge than the beings inhabiting the other lokas. However, they are not to be confused for the human-species (manushya-jaati); they are not part of humanity we find on earth. Their appearance, height, strength, longevity, caliber, intelligence, intellect, perception, knowledge, and so on greatly differ from the rest.] ~ Through good Karma and right inclination (nishkam and spiritual), one can ascend to the Spiritually advanced Higher Planets/Urdhva-Lokas (including Svarga-Loka); through OKay-ish Karma, indulgence of senses and unbridled desires, one can descend to the Spiritually deprived but Materially advanced Lower Planets/Adho-Lokas (also known as Bilva-Svarga). And through really really really bad/ PrarabdaKarma, one may have to suffer in one of the Hellish planets/Narak-Loka. (~ Materialistic does not imply actions alone; it signifies an attachment to things/aspects that are mundane and temporary (transient) and would definitely perish (e.g.) indulgent of the senses. Spiritual inclinations on the other hand, do not focus on temporary objects/aspects or sensory pleasures... but the "Truth" (dharma) and the eternal bliss/spiritual ecstasy (complete contentment) of "self-realization" ~ Sat-cit-ānanda. This (in turn) enables one to perform great deeds for the greater good... and thus [Spiritual inclinations] is considered superior.) ~ Besides earthlings/humans there are other advanced humans/beings/humanoids inhabiting the other Middle Planets/Madhya-Lokas; they could be a few maha-yug/four-yug cycle ahead of us, some of them probably have perpetual Treta Yug. If earthlings (or the inhabitants of the Middle Planets/Madhya-Lokas) or the inhabitants of the Adho-Lokas/Lower Realms become advanced in spiritual conditions - through right inclinations and good karma (i.e. through nishkam karm/selfless action - without expecting praise or glory, etc in return), they can advance to one of the higher Munilokas (Spiritually advanced planets inhabited by Higher spiritual and enlightened beings). But if they become attached to material enjoyment (indulgence of senses and unbridled desires, etc) - they will degrade into a lower position of a semi-divine being, a Human, or even to the Adho-Lokas/Lower Realms ~ again. And through really really really bad/Prarabda Karma, one may have to suffer in one of the Hellish planets/Narak-Loka. ~ Even if one is a 'Deva' or a 'Rishi' (both: Spiritually advanced Higher beings residing in different Urdhva Lokas/Higher Planets; Rishi = ray of light, illumination; it indicates an enlightened person with an illumined mind) - there is no guarantee that he or she won't be re-born (e.g.) as a Human or as an inhabitant of the Adho-Lokas or as an animal, etc - in his or her next birth. It all depends on one's karma. The only certain way to come out of this Samsara or the Never-ending Cycle of Birth, Death and Re-birth - is by performing copious amounts of good karma (nishkam/selfless karma/non-benefit/glory-seeking karma) ~ that would "wash off" any (carried over) Prarabda karm (bad, negative karma) - thereby giving the jiva-aatma (human or individual soul) a clean slate and/or a positive balance of good karm. Note: The Almighty does not put us through any kind of test. (He is not human; He is Aadinath - the Supreme Almighty, the Absolute; He is the Highest Being; He is Narayan - the benefactor of mankind/humanity (nara); He is a father-figure. We can associate with Him in many ways: as a friend/teacher/guru/guide/mentor/sibling/parent.) ~ Whatever happens, happens due to our karm only - whether good karm or Prarabda karm (bad, negative karm) - carried over from our past (positive or negative balance of karma). [It not only affects humanity, but also society and civilization as well.] 'Karm' or 'Karma' is not punishment; it is an opportunity to redeem oneself. (Good/positive) karm is essential to get rid of (bad/negative) karm. Hence, in order to get rid of Prarabda (bad, negative) Karm - whether done by us or by others - we have to perform good deeds (Sat Karm) in copious quantities. ... And as we go on performing good deeds indefinitely/continuously, sakama (selfish, glory-seeking) karm gets transformed into Nishkam (selfless) Karm. ~ In this way, Prarabda/bad/negative karm gets "washed off"... and is replaced by a positive (balance of) karm. ... By continuing on this path, a jiva-aatma (human soul or individual soul) can move upward - i.e. gain entry into the various Spiritually advanced Higher Planets... and finally into the eternal Vaikunth planets (the abode of the Almighty). ~ Or, it can achieve "Moksha" (liberation from the constant cycle of Life, Death and Re-birth) on the Earth-Realm itself, thereby gaining entry into the eternal Vaikunth planets: by performing an enormous amount of nishkam karm/deeds (non-glory-seeking karm) - in the selfless service of humanity... that (in turn) contributes towards a better society and civilization. ~ On a separate note, a large chunk of various ailments and disorders can be traced to health and hygiene issues, lifestyle issues, heredity, stress, environmental factors, chemical content, pollution, and so on. [Bhu-Loka or the Earth-Realm seems to be sort of a launch-pad from where one can reach the other worlds/lokas - based on one's Karma.]

I bow to the Kaal Purush who is beyond time and who presides over the all-destructive time.I bow to mahendrah: The lord of Indra. I bow to gabheeraatmaa: One who is too deep to be fathomed.


I bow to the Unicorn, the rarest of the rare (not to be found anywhere else). I bow to the purusattamah: The greatest of the great. I bow to anuttamah: Incomparably great.

I bow to the vishama, (unequaled); the atulah, (incomparable); the ekah (the one); the ekaatmaa: The one self. I bow to the One without a parallel. [Note:the Unicorn, depicted, as a one-horned horse is imagery - to indicate rarity and peerlessness. It is not to be taken at face value. It does not refer to any creature, mythical or otherwise. There has never been a one-horned horse in reality. It is simply an imagery to (figuratively or symbolically) convey certain concepts.]


I bow to the Unicorn. I bow to the thousand-horned great bull with a hundred heads. I bow to Vrishaakritih - Dharma (Vrisha) Himself. I bow to Vrishaparvaa, Dharmadhyaksha - Lord of Dharma. I bow to the illustrious God of gods who is alsocalled Vṛṣabha (the Great Bull). I bow to Vrisha Uttamam, the Supreme Bull (Supreme Dharma). I bow to mahaavaraaho: The great boar. I bow to Kapih, the foremost of boars - eka (one) shringa (horned) varaha. I pay my humble obeisance to Vrishakapi- the one-horned Varaha, the Supreme form of Shri Vishnu.

[Note: The 'thousand-horned great bull with a hundred heads'does not refer to any animal or creature. It is a metaphor/symbol or imagery for Dharma (actions that benefit society/humanity). Krishna personifies dharma, and through his actions rejuvenates and re-establishes dharma. It takes a great deal of (unmatched) tenacity, strength, energy, drive, valiance and determination to do so. Hence the metaphor of the 'thousand-horned great bull with a hundred heads'. Dharma = justice; also, actions that benefit humanity/society. The one-horned boar: ekashringa varaha or unicorn boar alsodoes not refer to any animal per se. It means, the rarest of the rare; not to be found anywhere else. Ekashringa Varaha or Unicorn Boar: One without a parallel. This Indus seal is the seal of Lord Krishna. Krishna is protector and preserver. He rescues/pulls society out of 'quicksand', or prevents its slide into 'quicksand'/quagmire, hence the metaphor of 'Ekashringa Varaha' or Unicorn Boar.]



I bow to the Grandest Master of all.

The great poet and composer, Rajonikanto Sen, said:

|| Tumi aachho Bishwanatho ashimo rahoshyo majhe... nirabe, ekaki ||

O Lord of the Universe, You reside amidst endless cosmic mysteries... in absolute quietude.

[Bishwanath = Lord of the Cosmos. Bishwa = Universe, Cosmos; Nath = Lord, Master.]

|| Prabhuh, Bishwa-bipado-hanta, Tumi danrao rudhiya pantha ||

O My Lord, You are the benefactor of humanity; You are the dispeller of great calamity; You stand between.

 || Tabo, charono nimne, utshabomoyi shyamo-dharini sharosa,
urdhe chaho agonito-moni-ronjito navo neelanchala 
shaumyo-modhur-dibyangana shanto-kushalo-darosha ||

Beneath your feet lies the prosperous and bountiful earth 
Behold the blue sky engraved with countless gems above
She is like a sweet and graceful angel


Robi Thakur said:

|| Anando-loke Mangal-aloke birajo Satya-Sundaro
Mohima Tabo udbhashito maha-gagono-majhe
Bishwa-jagoto monibhushano-beshtito-charone... ||

In Ananda-lok, amidst auspicious glow (Mangal-aloke) resides the Satya-Sundar. Your majesty is manifest in the firmament complete. Creation's jewels are strewn at your feet.

|| The world sings Your glory great
In fearless refuge at Your feet
You who are our treasure and wealth
You who enclose all of this earth ||

This prayerful song (rendered by Indranil Sen) is on truth and beauty, on the bounties of nature and the splendour that this universe is. Most of what the poet laureate wrote is sublime and none, I repeat, none... can even begin to try to translate what he so effortlessly expressed through this highly lyrical poem. Do listen:




Here is Kabiguru Rabindranath Tagore's dream of a free and glorious India. Inspiring and timeless words, indeed:

|| Where the mind is without fear and the head is held high
Where knowledge is free
Where the world has not been broken up into fragments
By narrow domestic walls
Where words come out from the depth of truth
Where tireless striving stretches its arms towards perfection
Where the clear stream of reason has not lost its way
Into the dreary desert sand of dead habit
Where the mind is led forward by thee
Into ever-widening thought and action
Into that heaven of freedom, my Father, let my country awake ||


[Note:This poem (no. 35) isfrom Tagore's Noble prize-winning literarywork 'Gitanjali' (tr: An Offering of Songs). Git/Geet = Songs. Anjali = Offering.]

An audio-visual version of the above poem read by Samuel Godfrey George:




One of the most beautiful of all the Rabindrasangeet/Tagore-songs, Aaguner Paroshmoni, happens to be one of my personal favourites too. Rendered by the peerless Hemanta Mukhopadhyay. Do listen:




|| Aagun'eyr Pawroshmoni chhnoyao praane
(Ey jibon punya kaw'ro) -
3
Ey jibon punya kaw'ro dwahon-daane
Aagun'eyr pawroshmoni chhonyao praane

(Aamaar eyi dehokhaani tulay dhaw'ro
Tomaar oi debaaloy-e pradip kaw'ro) -
2
 (Nishi din aalok shikhaa joluk gaane) -
2
Aagun'eyr pawroshmoni chhonyao praane

(Aandhareyr gaaye gaaye pawrosh tawbo
Shaaraa raat photaak taaraa nawbo nawbo) -
2
Nawyoneyr drishti hote ghnuchbe kaalo
Jekhane poRbe setha'ye dey'khbe aalo
(Bya'tha mor uthbe jol'ey urd'dha'-paane) -
2

Aaguner poroshmoni chonwao prane
(Ey jibon punno koro) -
3
Ey jibon punya kaw'ro dwahon-daane
Aagun'eyr Pawroshmoni chhnoyao praane ||


[Note: The annotation given above... to make your pronunciation as close to authentic Bangla as possible. Please follow the romanized annotation with slight pauses at the apostrophes.]

Translation:

|| Touch my heart with Your fire
And purify it,
So it can burn as a glorious offering to You.

Let me be like a lamp in Your temple
And let every song of mine pour out as its flame.

Whenever there's a feeling of darkness within,
May I be blessed to feel Your touch
And let my mind sparkle forever with newer and newer thoughts
Just as You light the stars one after another all through the night.

Let the veil of darkness be lifted from my sight
And let me see wondrous light wherever I gaze.

And turn all my pain into a blazing intensity in all that I do... ||


[Paroshmoni is the philosopher's stone which when touched... alchemically transmutes the baser nature to a divine one. It is symbolic... though some believe it truly exists. Fire = auspicious effulgence, Light Divine. Here is another linkwith English translation, though it is impossible to translate. Simply because: Tagore's oeuvre is one of those things that cannot survive translation (into English), however much one tries; anyone who has had the experience of soaking in the magic of Tagore's lyrics... can and will vouch for this.]


I bow to archishmaan: The effulgent one. I bow to the paramaatmaa: The Supersoul. I bow to Nara-Narayan. [Narah: The guide. Narayan: The benefactor of humanity/mankind (not restricted to humans alone, though).] I bow to amoghah: He whose acts are for a great purpose. I bow to hamsah: The swan. He with a large-hearted intelligence. I bow to ekah: The one. I bow to naikah: The many. I bow to asankhyeyah: He who has countless names and forms. I bow to mangalam param: The Supreme auspiciousness. I bow to shoorah-veerah: The valiant. I bow to vikramee: The most daring. I bow to saattvikah: One who is full of sattvic qualities. I bow to kartaa: The doer. I bow to maargah: The path. I bow to neyah: The guide. I bow to aadidevah: The first devah/deity [34 = 33+1, 'coz Shri Vishnu is the Supreme Creator, Brahmn.] I bow to mahaadevah: The great devah/deity. I bow to deveshah: The Lord of all devas. I bow to adhaataa: Above whom there is no other [34 = 33+1].

I bow to keshavah: One whose rays illumine the cosmos, and one who is himself the three: kah Brahma, ah Vishnu and Isa Shiva. I bow to vishvam: He who is the universe, the virat-purusha. I bow to Vishvaroopa: One whose body is the Universe. I bow to Vishvaatma: Soul of the Universe. I bow to vanamaalee: One who wears a garland of forest flowers. I bow to sragvee: He who always wears a garland of undecaying flowers. I bow to Mayur: The Lord Who Has A Peacock Feathered-Crest. I bow to shikhandee: He who wears a peacock feather.


 

O Lord, You are the Mother, You are the Father, You Are the Kinsman and You are the Friend. You Are My Wealth Of Knowledge, Strength, Power And Valour. You Are My God Of Gods.


You are the boat and You are the boatman. You are the companion and You the support.

The God who is in fire, who is in water, who interpenetrates the whole universe, who is in herbs, who is in trees, to that God I bow down again and again.

Thou art, O Lord, the Creator of this Universe. Thou art the Protector of this world. Thou art in the grass and the rose. Thou art in the sun and the stars. Salutations unto Thee, O Destroyer of the cycle of births and deaths! Salutations unto Thee, O Bestower of Bliss and Immortality!


Salutations to Thee, the Supreme Lord! Thou art without beginning and end. Thou art the flower. Thou art the bee. Thou art woman. Thou art man. Thou art the sea. Thou art the waves. [The above seal very likely depicts the Ashta-Matrika or Ashta-Matara - Eight Divine Mothers: Brahmani (or Brāhmī), Vaishnavi, Maheshvari (also known as Raudri, Rudrani and Maheshi; was she a sister or cousin of Shambhu Nath/Shiva?), Indrani (also known as Aindri, Mahendri, Shakri, Shachi and Vajri), Kaumari (also known as Kumari and Karttikeyani), Varahi, Chamunda (also known as Chamundi) and Narasimhi.]

Thou art Self-luminous. Thou art Self-effulgent (jyotih).


Thou art Light Divine. Thou art Light of knowledge. Thou art the dispeller of darkness. Thou art the Supreme Guru. Thou art beyond the reach of mind and speech. Thou art beyond any kind of limitation. Thou art the Self of this universe.

Om Santih! Santih! Santih!

Aum let there be peace within us, let there be peace in the world, let there be peace in the universe.

Aaguner Paroshmoni by Indrani Sen and Ambar Chakraborty (along with Srikanta Acharjo and Gauri Ghosh):



 
Purify me with your virtues, wiping off the vices of our hearts,
Let your auspicious effulgence take away the darkness and greed of our souls.



[A humble endeavour: Notes on Shri Krishn, deciphering the Mahabharata, etc ~ do read the post in its entirety... to grasp its scope, et al.]


BG 11.5: sri-bhagavan uvaca (Sri Bhagavan said): || pasya me paartha rupani sataso 'tha sahasrasah nana-vidhani divyani nana-varnakrtini ca || ~ "Behold, O Paartha [O son of Prtha], by hundreds and thousands, My different forms: celestial, varied in colours and shapes."[Prtha = Kunti's real name.] | Lord Krishna is considered as the Cosmic Person/Being in his totality of manifestation. He is not an Avatar of the Cosmic Person/Being, but is considered as the Cosmic Person/Being Himself (albeit, in the flesh). || krishnas tu bhagavan svayam || He is the Cosmic Teacher and Cosmic Ruler. He is the sum-total of all the Cosmic, Solar and Planetary Devas. He is the Yogi of the Yogis. The Deva of the Devas. He is the Synthesis of the universe. | ... There is noone on this planet that can really depict how our Gods actually look like. There is none who can authenticate the actual appearance of God (Satyam-Sivam-Sundaram: Satyam = Eternal/Truth/Dharma; Sivam = Auspiciousness; Sundaram = Goodness/Principles). In the last few hundred generations, nobody has actually seen Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva; therefore, nobody can vouch for their exact appearances. [And, the same is applicable to the Dasavatara. E.g. noone knows how Krishn actually looked like.] The visual depictions/idols or images of our gods are (therefore) based on imagination (very likely that of more than one person.) However, these images and idols incorporate postures, symbolism and metaphorical understanding ~ to communicate and define the entire functioning of the universe/cosmos. [None of which is to be taken literally; they are all allegorical and full of symbolism.] Also, Sanaatan Dharma does not promote fear toward God (therefore, the human-like images are serene-faced and reassuring). There is no concept of 'fear of god'. ~ And though we are very familiar with Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva, not all of the Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva (mentioned in our ancient texts and scriptures) are entities. Some of them are just metaphors for one or the other cosmic force (even sub-force or energy.) For example, Lord Shiva's physical form itself (with which we all are very familiar)... is just imagery (not to be taken literally) for a (namesake) force of the universe. [Also, cosmic turbulence is euphemistically called 'tandav' or 'tandav nritya'. Its physical depiction - the Nataraj form of the cosmic 'Shiva-force' - alludes to this.] Besides, there have also been keertiman humans by the name of Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva (possibly, more than one set of Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva ~ following the last great flood/Mahajal Pralaya.) Lakshmi, Sarasvati and Parvati are higher cosmic entities/beings, while their human namesakes have achieved amaratva/'eternal life' (and are thus, 'mrityunjay') on the strength of their karm. And while there was a Kaali on earth, elsewhere in the cosmos 'Kaali' is the name of a cosmic force (rather a sub-force)... that keeps the cosmic 'Shiva-force' inert. However, due to the passage of time... multiple narratives have converged and fused into one. There were human Varuna and Indra (very likely a 'title' for the chief/king of the 'Asura' and 'Deva' clans respectively); probably a somewhat monolithic clan that later branched into two. One of these 'Indra' defeated Varuna. Eons later... Meghnaad defeated another 'Indra' ~ and took on the title of 'Indrajeet'. [For great kings and emperors... to assume a title was common in earlier eras/yugs. In the current yug, Samraat Chandragupta II had assumed the title of "Vikramaditya" ~ after thwarting the imperialistic designs/machinations and ambitions of the Sakas, and driving them out of wide swathes of land, (probably almost the whole of modern Asia). He then established peace and prosperity under his wise, benevolent and enlightened rule.] However, by Krishn's time... there was no human Varuna or Indra. ['Deva' does not mean "demi-god", and 'Asura' does not mean "demon". Such connotations have come about... thanks to mistranslation.] 'Danava', 'Rakshasa' and 'Daitya' were 'Asura' sub-clans, while 'Gandharva' and maybe the 'Suparnah' (falcon or golden eagle emblem/insignia/totem-bearing clan) and the 'Shakuna' (vulture emblem/insignia/totem-bearing clan) were 'Deva' sub-clans. Garuda was a prominent 'Suparnah': probably a 'title' for the leader or chief. As for the 'Shakuna' clan: think of Jatayu and Sampati, they were not birds per se. Also, Shakuntala was cared for and brought up by the Shakuna people. (Shakuntala: one who grew up under the care of the Shakuna; the 'shakun' in Shakuntala is not 'vulture' per se. Tala = under the care of.) [Note: It is possible that the 'Danava', 'Rakshasa' and 'Daitya'were considerably taller than the others, and so, this could have been a distinguishing feature. (However, there has never been a homogeneous set of humans on earth.) The humans of the earlier eras would have (in all likelihood) differed in height, longevity, appearance and other physical characteristics, etc... compared to modern humans. Even the adivasis (descendents of the first set of humans that evolved on earth; do also read paragraph #6 ~ from the last) of the earlier eras/yugs would have been different from their modern counterparts. Also, somewhere down the line, whether various adivasi clans came to be regarded as 'Danava', 'Rakshasa' and 'Daitya' or not ~ my guess is as good as yours. Plus, various ancient humans/groups have become extinct... whether they were replaced by others ~ my guess is as good as yours. Also, the earth has been witness to numerous events and has undergone enormous amounts of changes over the past several million or billions of years. And this would also include the great deluge (Mahajal Pralaya) and other forms of "Pralaya" (cataclysmic events). However, the last great deluge/flood (Mahajal Pralaya) cannot be millions of years old. Therefore, how many types of flora, fauna and humans have inhabited or walked on this earth ~ my guess is as good as yours. Besides, (e.g.) perhaps, once upon a time the Antarctic was habitable. [So the topography there as well as the Antarctic ice will surely contain millions of years of our climate history, etc.] Also, due to these Pralayas (cataclysmic events) and Mahajal Pralaya (great flood) we do not quite know how the terrain/topography, geography, flora and fauna, et al of the world looked like (in earlier eras/yugs) or has evolved. As to how various extinct (or lost) flora and fauna make their re-appearance ~ my guess is as good as yours. So, will the blue lotus (pushkara or indivara) and/or the red lotus (kokonada, kamala) re-appear - once mankind/humanity reaches the 'Golden Age' (Sat/Satya/Krita Yug)? - My guess is as good as yours.] Note: After the decline of the Gupta era, the various translations and interpretations (of the earlier texts) as well as the many new texts that emerged... not only missed out on the symbolic, metaphorical and allegorical aspects of Sanaatan Dharma, the post-Gupta era translators also could not quite figure out the many scientific and technological verses (involving advanced medical science, biotechnology and quantum physics - that were an integral part of the earlier eras, texts and scriptures; some of which were even related to celestial events involving stars, planets, etc.) Not only did the later translators lack the necessary vocabulary, the Sanskrit language too did not remain stagnant; so there were changes in phonetics, meanings and so on. ... And these (very likely) also impacted the later translations and interpretations (besides newer works that were based on these post-Gupta era translations). Similar-sounding names and nomenclature too may have given rise to confusion. Plus, many events/aspects have been taken literally, while several narratives have fused into one. ~ 'Yagna' or 'Yagna-kund' indicated research, scientific procedures, etc... and not fire-ritual per se. New concepts (such as propitiation) came about - thanks to the ritual-heavy "Brahminical faith"; however, prarabda karm (bad, negative karm) cannot be "washed off" and (thereby gradually) a positive balance of karm gained - through propitiation, rituals, and so on; there is no alternative to karm yog. Also, the Cosmic Being/Cosmic Ruler as well as the Cosmic Plan has nothing to do with propitiation, and the like. That apart, there have been innumerable retelling, interpolations, extrapolations, re-writings, simplification, and over-simplification even... for the purposes of stage plays, songs, poetry, and so on. ~ The post-Gupta period (unfortunately) was not marked by a scientific temperament/achievements or by intellectual stimulation, unlike the Gupta era and before*. ... So objectivity or objective narration may have become a casualty to emotions and the sign of the times. ~ My guess is as good as yours. [*Bharatavarsha, "cherished land": the continent ('varsha'; Sanskrit) that is dedicated ('rata') to light, wisdom ('bha').]

|| Mangalam Bhagavaan Vishnu Mangalam Garuda-Dhvaja Mangalam Pundarikaaksho Mangalaayatano Harih || [Link] Pundarikaaksho = lotus-eyed; one whose eyes are shaped like lotus petals. [Puṇḍarīka/Pundarika or Pankaja/Svetakamala/Dhavala (pronounced: DA wahl) kamala/Shubhra Kamala is "white/pure white lotus". Pure white signifies pristine, embodiment of pure knowledge. It also signifies tranquility.] Garuda-Dhvaja = the symbol or insignia of Lord Narayan. Garuda = the divine bird, also: the king of birds. Here, "Garuda" refers to eagle or maybe falcon (may not be similar to what we see on Earth.) Lord Narayan is also shown holding a lotus flower; it is usually pink (pale red or red-pink) in colour. This is the supreme lotus, for the highest deity; Lord Narayan is "Anish" - Supreme; He is "Aadinath" - the Foremost, the Supreme, the Almighty, the Absolute. [The pink lotus (pale-red) is padma in Sanskrit. The rare blue lotus is termed pushkara or indivara. It is also known as krishna kamal. This is a symbol of the victory of the spirit over the senses, and signifies the wisdom of knowledge. The Neel-kamal - the blue water-lily (utpala) is also called krishna kamal. The blue lotus (pushkara or indivara) and the blue water-lily (utpala) are often confused despite the distinct differences between the two plants. Many say: there is no blue lotus, no such flower exists or ever has; that it is a botanical chimera. That: lotuses can be white (pundarika, svetakamala, dhavala kamala, shubhra kamala, pankaja), pink (padma) or pink-going-on-red (kokonada, kamala), but they are never blue. ... But then, perhaps a long time ago the blue lotus was indeed blue; that there indeed was a blue lotus (pushkara or indivara) - known to our ancients; maybe it was a rare flower. And maybe, due to environmental factors, etc the blue lotus (pushkara or indivara) went into a Nirvikalpa Samadhi to awaken to moksha. ~ And when this happened, our forefathers began to consider the blue water-lily (utpala) as a replacement. (The blue water-lily (utpala) is actually a delicate shade of indigo.) ~ Perhaps, a similar thing happened with the red lotus (kokonad, kamala) too, who can say? Meaning: the actual red lotus may have faded away from the face of the earth, and therefore, had to be replaced by the pink-going-on-red variety.] Lord Narayan is "Rohit" (Rohitah/Lohitah in Sanskrit ~ rosy-white. Rosy-hued or reddish is Rohitah or Lohitah in Sanskrit.) Therefore, Lord Narayan Himself is (the personification of) the Supreme Lotus (the pink or pale-red lotus). Various gods, such as Shri Brahma (Chief Engineer/Scientist of the Cosmos), Sri Sri Lakshmi Devi (the consort of Lord Vishnu/Narayan, and the deity/symbol/bestower of wealth, well-being, prosperity, generosity, auspiciousness and happiness) and Goddess Sarasvati (the consort of Lord Brahma, and the deity/symbol/bestower of knowledge, wisdom and enlightenment) are also depicted as 'sitting' on a lotus flower: only the most enlightened and blessed (i.e. highly favoured or fortunate - by divine grace, or worthy of deep reverence, veneration and worship) can 'sit' on a lotus flower. [Goddess Lakshmi is shown sitting on a full-blown red lotus (sincered-colored Lotus symbolizes wealth and prosperity) holding lotus buds in two of Her hands and benignly blessing all those who come to Her for succour. The fully-bloomed lotus She is seated on, represents the seat of Divine Truth. The aura of joy surrounding Her depicts mental and spiritual balance. Peace and prosperity always exist around Her. Gayatri Mantra for Goddess Lakshmi: || Om Mahalakshmai Cha Vidmahe Vishnu Patnyai Cha Dhimahi Tanno Lakshmihi Prachodayat || ~ "Om. May we meditate on the Great Goddess Sri Lakshmi, the consort of Sri Maha Vishnu. May that effulgent Maha Lakshmi Devi inspire and illumine our mind and understanding." ~ The name "Lakshmi" is derived from the Sanskrit elemental form "lakS," meaning to observe or perceive. This is also synonymous with "lakSya," meaning aim, goal or objective. Lakshmi is thus a Goddess who is regarded as the means to achieving several goals, importantly, becoming prosperous. Goddess Sarasvati, on the other hand, is shown sitting on a white lotus (Puṇḍarīka/Pundarika or Shubhra Kamal). White signifies pure knowledge. Goddess Sarasvati is the embodiment/symbol of pure knowledge.] Goddess Parvati holds a lotus, and is sometimes seen as standing on a lotus. [Her eighteen arms signify that she possesses combined power of nine incarnations of Lord Vishnu that have appeared on the earth at different times in the past. She preserves "dharma" by dispelling/destroying negative aspects of human nature such as selfishness, jealousy, prejudice, hatred, anger, and ego.] Suryadev/Lord Surya (not to be mistaken for the sun that rises in the east and sets in the west) is sometimes depicted sitting on a red lotus (kokonada, kamala). [The red lotus signifies the original nature and purity of the heart (hrdya).] However, other higher entities/beings like Devaraj Indra, Dharmaraj Yamaraj, Pavandev, Chitragupt, et al are not depicted 'sitting' on a lotus flower. ~ The roots of a lotus are in the mud, the stem grows up through the water, and the heavily scented flower lies pristine above the water, basking in the sunlight. The lotus remains completely uncontaminated, even though rooted in the dirtiest, muddiest waters. This pattern of growth signifies the progress of the soul from the primeval mud of materialism, through the waters of experience, and into the bright sunshine of enlightenment. Also, for those performing nishkam karm/selfless service/actions... for a better society - it is 'lotus feet' and kara-puṣkara or 'lotus-palm'. [puṣkara = blue lotus; the blue lotus is completely up and out of the (muddy) water.] The spirit of such persons is spotless, like the lotus in the muddy water that remains "detached" [does not adhere to it.] ~ BG 11.12: || divi surya-sahasrasya bhaved yugapad utthita yadi bhah sadrisi sa syad bhasas tasya mahatmanah || ~ "If hundreds of thousands of suns were to rise at once into the sky, their radiance might resemble the effulgence of the Supreme One/Great Soul/Param-aatma." Alternatively: "If the radiance of a thousand suns were to suddenly burst forth in the sky, that would be like the light of the exalted one." ... The Gayatri/Savitr Mantra is a prayer to that Jyotiḥ-mayaḥ/Tejasvi: possibly, Brahm-jyoti - the Divine effulgence (also referred to as "Brahmn") - emanating from Goloka-Paravyoma (the spiritual abode of Shri Krishn). ~ It is the light that impersonalists perceive in the Nirguna mode of the God/Almighty. (The Supreme Being/Almighty is the manifestation (saguna) of this Brahmn. He is also the manifestation of Om or Aum - the Pranava-naad.) The Gayatri/Savitr Mantra is a prayer to the Jyotiḥ-mayaḥ/Tejasvi (effulgent Brahmn) as well as to the Sun (jyotiḥ, Sūrya, Aaditya) ~ without whom there can be no life on the earth-plane. [Technically speaking, what promotes life is the energy of the sun. The rays from the sun not only support life, but the rays of the sun are indeed the source of life itself.] Enhance the efficacy of the life principles, including one's body, mind and soul. ~ Visualize the sun's rays streaming forth into your body, mind and soul... and guiding you through the path of illumination (sūrya-dvāreṇa): || Aum Bhur Bhuvah Svaha Tat Savitur Varenyam Bhargo Devasya Dhimahi Dhiyoyonah Prachodayat || ~ Pronounced: || OHM BUR BOO-VAH SVA-HA TAHT SAH-VEE-TOOR VAHR-EHN-YUM BHAHR-GO DEH-VAHS-YAH DEE-MAH-HEE DEE-YOH YOHN-AH PRAH-CHOD-DAH-YAHT || ~ OM. I revere the Divine Self who illuminates the three worlds - physical, astral and causal; I offer my prayers to that God who shines like the Sun. May He enlighten our intellect. [Alternatively: "O Lord, You are the protector of life and of breath, dispeller of miseries and bestower of happiness. You are the creator and the most acceptable intelligence, possessing eternal qualities. May Your qualities and Your inspiration pass to us."]

AUM (also known as OM): The syllable OM (written out as AUM with each letter having its own significance) represents Brahmn, the supreme creator (Srashtaa), as well as the whole of creation. OM represents the Shabda Brahmn. It is the primeval sound - pranavah/Omkara/pranava naad, the sound of the universe itself. The uttering of the sacred and mystical OM is called Onkar or Omkar. It is the sound of the origination and dissolution of the universe. The past, present, future and all that transcends time are all included in this sound. It represents that Jyotiḥ-mayaḥ/Tejasvi - Brahm-jyoti - the Divine effulgence (also referred to as "Brahmn") - emanating from Goloka-Paravyoma (the spiritual abode of Shri Krishn). ~ It is the light that impersonalists perceive in the Nirguna mode of the God/Almighty. Lord Narayan is the personification/manifestation (Omswaroop) of OM or AUM. Thus, He is Hariom. He is Omprakash - light of OM, light of the world. Here are some of the meanings embedded in this mantra:

Bhur
(earth) / Pranaswaroop
Bhuvah
(atmosphere) / Dukh Nashak
Swaha
(heavens) / Sukh Swaroop
Tat
(that)
Savitur
(of the source) / Tejasvi
Varenyam
(to be held sacred) / Shresht
Bhargo
(light) / Paap-nashak
Devasya
(of the effulgent) / Divyo ko
Dhimahi
(we meditate on) / Dharan karen
Dhiyo
(that illumined intelligence,
wisdom) / Buddhi ko
Yo
(which) / Jo
Nah
(us) / Hamari
Prachodayat
(inspires) / Prerit kare



There are a few "miracles" associated with Krishna's birth. Let's consider. The guards "magically"falling asleep and the prison gates opening and closing "miraculously" - these can be attributed to the many acts of kindness displayed by the palace, kitchen and jail staff. Krishna's mother (Devaki) was the daughter of the deposed king, Ugrasena, and she (along with Vasudev) was suffering at the hands of her own brother Kansh. Hence, we cannot rule out the presence of sympathetic people within the rank and file - even during Kansh's reign, [since Kansh's powerful minister Akrura himself was sympathetic towards Krishna (in later years).] Therefore: the food may have been spiked (to make some of the guards on duty to fall into a deep slumber) while the other guards (who were sympathetic towards Krishna's parents) opened the prison gates, thus enabling Vasudev to take the baby Krishna to a safer place. Once he returned, these guards simply locked the prison gates. Also: the Nag was a serpent-worshiping clan. Probably they displayed a serpent totem/insignia too. One of their prominent king/chieftain, Vasuki, shielded the baby Krishna (from inclement weather) during Vasudev's journey. However, later translators misinterpreted this... thereby turning Vasuki into a gigantic serpent. He was very much human! The 'daiva-vaani' (divine announcement - that the 8th child of Devaki-Vasudev would be Kansh's nemesis) probably is #1. a reference (and interpretation) of Kansh's dream - by his royal astrologer, or #2. a reference to the latter's prediction. Kansh was a megalomaniac and tyrant (who was also under the influence of the despotic Jarasandha), so it is entirely possible that he physically battered Devaki's babies, or it could also be that he denied them (and her) all forms of medical assistance (during and after the deliveries). Either way, all the babies died soon after birth. [Whatever little help the staff may have extended... wouldn't have been enough.] However, the 7th child, Balarama, was transferred from Devaki's womb to Rohini's womb (via embryo transfer. Here 'Rohini' is a reference to an incubator - that acted as a surrogate womb, just like 'Ganga' is a reference/metaphor for a lab). This 'embryo transfer' (probably) happened due to the combined efforts of certain members of the staff (who were sympathetic to Devaki and Vasudev) and other influential figures (like Kansh's minister, Akrura.) As for Yogmaya or Vishnu-maya (supposedly the "daughter" of King Nand, and a replacement for the newborn Krishna) - probably "she" was a life-like baby doll (with an internal structure, which allowed for life-like movement and positioning or posing.) Maybe the word "maya" has, therefore, been used (perhaps, to indicate "illusion", i.e. something that induced the "illusion" of a real/human baby. Or in other words: something that simulated the characteristics of a human baby.) As for Subhadra, supposedly Krishna's "half-sister" (who was "born" of Rohini)... well, 'Rohini' is (a reference to) an incubator - that acted as a surrogate womb. So, one isn't quite sure what is meant by "half-sister", except that later-day translators have yet again not understood technology... and, therefore, interpolated. [However, whether Subhadra (and the Arjun-Subhadra story) is courtesy later interpolations or not - my guess is as good as yours.]

Krishna, the wielder of 'Sudarshan Chakra'; Krishna, the celestial flautist; Krishna, the primeval guru; Krishna, the Satguru; Krishna, the greatest guide; Krishna, one who has no leader (anaya); Krishna, leader of men (jahnuh); Krishna, the twinkle-eyed makkhan-chor (Navanitachora); Krishna, one who accomplishes great and noble tasks; Krishna, the Giridhari - one who accomplishes Herculean tasks (against huge obstacles, hence the metaphor of 'Giridhari'. It is not literal.) Krishna, Ghanshyam - the "all absorbing one". [During his lifetime, (it is said) he was the target of malicious attacks. Accusations, abuse and insults were hurled at him; several small-minded people orchestrated these. But Krishna never stooped low nor responded back in kind. Instead: He simply absorbed them all - with his characteristic grace, and hence, is also known as Ghanshyam - the all-absorbing one.] Krishna, of the bright shining eyes (Ravilochan); Krishna, Kamalnayan - one with eyes shaped like lotus petals; Krishna, grayish to dusky blue (similar to the colour of a newborn's skin immediately after birth); [Blue also stands for: meditation/introspection, peace, tranquility, depth, stability, trust, loyalty, wisdom, confidence, intelligence, patience, decision-making and truth/dharma: actions that benefit society.] Krishna, Neelamber, velvet blue-hued - Supreme Neelkanth: One who absorbs "poison" or "toxin" (arising out of societal churning) - thereby cleansing it sufficiently enough... for it to "heal", so as to be able to function (in a positive manner). He thus lifts the cloud of negativity as well as the 'fog of untruth and make-believe' (from our eyes, thoughts and hearts), clears past cobwebs... thus showing the way forward. Krishna, of the magnetic personality, good looks (Shrikant), matchless charm, charisma, brilliance, perception, energy, drive, patience, tenacity and valiance; Krishna, a master strategist, a great visionary; Krishna, whose brilliance (symbolically referred to as 'Sudarshan Chakra') cuts through every vyuh; Krishna, whose 'Sudarshan Chakra' pre-empts or negates the plans/designs/machinations of negative entities. Krishna, a Reformer-Soldier-Statesman par excellence; Krishna, a class act: one who outwitted and outmanoeuvred assorted negative entities... from a position of great weakness; Krishna, warrior extraordinaire against adharm(Duryodhan, Dushshasana, Karna, Shakuni, Kansh, Jarasandha, et al and their machinations); Krishna, "bhuta-bhavya-bhavat-prabhu" - the Master of all things past, future and present; Krishna, the possessor of Tritiya-Nayan (the metaphoric Third Eye); Krishna, who holds a mirror to society; Krishna, a human who is unlike any other mere mortal; Krishna, a 'lila-avatar'; Krishna, a human who is not part of the constant cycle of life and death; Krishna, Ekam Eva Advitiyam - The One. The Peerless; Krishna, Peetamber or Peetabasa (draped in the colour gold/golden-yellow - the colour of enlightenment, represented by the metaphoric/symbolic 'halo'); Krishna, wrapped in cool cyan - bluish green (utpalavarnah: like blue lotus, Indivara or krishnakamal). [So, is Lord Narayan/Shri Hari Vishnu (or maybe His third form/aspect - Kṣīrodakaśāyī-Viṣṇu) bluish green-hued? Thus making him the Cosmic Mayur? - My guess is as good as yours. [Is He blue-hued like the Robin? Or is He the most magnificent of all blues ~ the one adorning the plumage of the Indian Roller (Neelkanth)? ... But then, since He is also known as "Rohit" (Rohitah/Lohitah in Sanskrit) ~ is he rosy-white? (Rosy-hued or reddish is Rohitah or Lohitah in Sanskrit.) ~ Well, my guess is as good as yours.] Note: Apart from the līlā incarnations (which includes the "Dasavatara"), there are qualitative incarnations (guṇa-avatāras) such as Brahmā, Viṣṇu, and Śiva (or Rudra/Rudra-Śiva) who take charge of the different modes of material nature. Therefore, all three - namely Brahmā, Viṣṇu (also: Mahā-Viṣṇu or Kāraṇodakaśāyī Viṣṇu's third form/aspect - Kṣīrodakaśāyī-Viṣṇu) and Śiva, are incarnations of the Garbhodakaśāyī Viṣṇu (second puruṣa). Rudra means: the dispeller of darkness and usherer of peace. He is called "the archer" (Sanskrit: Śarva) and the arrow is an essential attribute of Rudra. The word is derived from the Sanskrit root śarv, which means, "to negate" or "to dispel". Hence, the name Śarva can be interpreted as: "One who can dispel/drive away darkness". The names Dhanvin ("bowman") and Bāṇahasta("archer", literally: "Armed with arrows in his hands"/ Bāṇa = arrow, hasta = hand) also refer to archery/the archer. Rudra is described as armed with a bow and fast-flying arrows (baan/bāṇa). Rudra: also means: one who makes everyone weep: "ru", to cry or to teach, "rud", to make a person weep, and "dra" to flow. Hence Rudra is considered as a deity who teaches the supreme knowledge to all and whose energy flows in everything. Shiva (Sanskrit śiva) means:"the kindly/auspicious one". He is also the Lord of mercy and kindness.|| yo rudro agnau yo apsu ya oṣadhīṣu yo rudro viśvā bhuvanā viveśa tasmai rudrāya namo astu || ~ Meaning: To the Rudra who is fire, who is in water, who is in trees and plants, who has entered into the entire Universe, to that Rudra let our salutations go.] The Paśupati seal (very likely) depicts Rudra-Śiva or Harirudra. ~ Shivah Gayatri Mantra: || Aum Panchvakraye Vidmahe Mahadevaye Dheemahi Tanno Rudra Prachodayat || [The three eyes of Lord Shiva suggest: the Sun is his right eye; the Moon is the left eye and fire (agni), the third eye. [The "third eye" (very likely) indicates the Ajnea chakra (Brow Chakra, the 6th chakra, the third eye chakra ~ denoting spiritual guidance.) The word ajnacomes from the Sanskrit root which means 'to know, to obey and to follow'.Among Indians, it is also known as the "divya chakshu" (the divine eye) or the eye of knowledge. The third eye chakra is located in the brain, directly behind the eyebrow center at the top of spinal chord i.e. at the medulla oblongata. A two-petalled lotus symbolizes Ajna chakra. The left petal represents the moon or the ida nadi and the right petal represents the sun or the pingla nadi. Within the two-petalled lotus is a perfectly round circle that symbolizes the "shoonya" or the void i.e. the state completely devoid of ego/ahamkara. In this circle the symbol Om is written. 'Om' is the mantra and the symbol of ajna chakra. Shivah is the destroyer and the restorer (simultaneously): He is the destroyer of ego/ahamkara, ignorance, etc;the great ascetic (hamsan, "yogi"; do read the fourth paragraph from last... to know more about "yogi" and "detachment"), and the kind herdsman (shepherd) of souls (jiva-atmas/human or individual souls.)] (Lord Vishnu is also known as "Shaarnga-dhanvaa": One who aims His shaarnga bow, and "Chakree": Carrier of Sudarsana. ~ Do refer to paragraph # 18 ~ from the top, to know what 'Sudarshan Chakra' means/indicates.) Krishna, Shri Hari Vishnu's Purna avatar - one in whom divinity is manifested fully; Krishna, the eternal Mayur - regal, playful, dazzling (dynamic presence), captivating (Manohar), self-assured and a joy to behold. Krishna, the Unicorn (metaphor/symbol for unmatched, peerless); Krishna, the 'thousand-horned great bull with a hundred heads': Vrishaakritih - Dharma (Vrisha) Himself; Krishna, Vrishaparvaa, Dharmadhyaksha - the Lord of Dharma (not moralism or idealism, but actions that benefit society); Krishna, the illustrious God of gods who is alsocalled Vṛṣabha (the Great Bull); Krishna, Vrisha Uttamam - the Supreme Bull (Supreme Dharma). Krishna, mahaavaraaho: The great boar; Krishna, Kapih, the foremost of boars - eka (one) shringa (horned) varaha; Krishna, Vrishakapi- the one-horned Varaha, the Supreme form of Shri Vishnu; Krishna, || aśvatthaḥ sarva-vṛkṣāṇāḿ || ~ among trees, I am the peepal (ashvattha); [*Please refer to the Indus seals above - for all of these.] Krishna, a fine blend of the right values/ideals and principles as well as pragmatism; Krishna, a repository of intelligence, wisdom and enlightenment; Krishna, who spent time on earth in Dvapar. [So, some five millenniums down the line... sitting in Kaliyug if one were to imagine him, then maybe: take a much taller Gregory Peck, neat and clean-shaven - especially the one from "Roman Holiday", (along with all of Peck's quiet strength, aura, demeanour, reassuring presence, et al - many times over), add all of Chanakya's brilliance, knowledge, single-minded determination, wisdom, vision, perception, sagacity, resiliency, magnanimity and statesmanship - many times over, then add Cary Grant's charm - many times over, followed by several dashes of Steve McQueen and Ronald Colman, and finally, bucketfuls of Nicola Tesla (his vision, imagination and genius) and Steve Jobs (his finesse) besides (vast quantities of the confidence, acceleration, grit, drive, balance, zen, class, poise, energy, agility, never-say-die attitude, etc of) Usain Bolt, Viv Richards, Chris Gayle, Roger Federer (at his peak), Rafael Nadal and Djokovic. ... And still find that its not enough. That it's way, wayyy short.] Krishna, the 8th Vishnu; Krishna, who personifies dharma and karm; Krishna, the rejuvenator of dharma and karm (for the greater good); Krishna, a nation-builder par excellence; Krishna, a magnificent karm-yogi; Krishna, the other name for selfless/nishkam karm (not 'sacrifice', He is Vrishakapi - one-horned Varaha: He is protector and preserver. He rescues/pulls society out of 'quicksand', or prevents its slide into 'quicksand'/quagmire).

Krishna, who was born under unusual circumstances, who grew up... away from his parental home, was sent away to study at the age of 5 or 7, and who returned only to be instantly drawn into a whirlpool of intrigue (unleashed by the machinations of the tyrannical Jarasandha and Kansh). [Jain tradition recognizes Krishna as Vasudevand Jarasandh as the prati-Vasudev (possibly: anti-Krishna) - and this shows how important the rivalry between the two was.] Krishna, who appeared on the scene with his heroic abilities, superior intellect and tremendous political foresight (when the political situation of the country was most difficult); He, having been thrown into the situation, was quite clear in his objective. Krishna, of the Mahabharata and the SrimadBhagavad Geeta - far removed from the flute-wielding romantic who figures in Jayadev's "Geet Gobind"; Krishna, whose consort is Rukmini. [Satyabhama is very likely the consort of the Krishna of Jayadev's "Geet Gobind". Due to the similarity in names, narratives have confluenced. Shri Krishna was part of Dvapar - an era when #1. The human species on earth was very small in number and #2. Within that too the male-female ratio was heavily skewed. So, if at all there were a large number of milkmaids, they would have been unnatural humans (genetically engineered, cloned) and humanoids. Umm, we all are very familiar with the Meerabai story, aren't we? But then she lived about five centuries ago and Krishna was part of Dvapar. However, if five or six centuries down the line someone were to retell the Mahabharata story yet again, can we rule out the possibility of both these narratives merging? Also: Krishna was sent to study at MaharshiSandeepani and Garga Muni's ashram at the age of 5 or 7. Here he would have been put through a rigorous training regimen, spending his time reading a variety of subjects. (Ashrams or gurukul-s were situated in isolated/remote places and the students followed a strict/disciplined life.) So, it is quite unlikely that Krishn would have been able to spend his time, especially his teenage years, in the company of milkmaids (including Radha) or by playing with village boys (Sudama included). Also, Jambavan was part of Treta. So Krishna could not have married Jambavani in Dvapar. As for his supposed 16,108 'wives' or even 700,000 'wives' and 180,000 'sons', these cannot be taken at face value. These figures (very likely) came about courtesy the many cultic groups and movements that sprung up in Krishna's name, especially the 'Bhakti Movement'. Members of this movement considered themselves "married" to Shri Krishn. Yes, even the men. Also, the 'Bhakti Movement' being a reform movement, it is possible that many of these stories were woven in order to mainstream some marginalized groups, such as the 'tritiya prakriti', etc. A multitude of retelling, paintings, poems, songs, music, stage plays et al followed, and over time... bits and pieces of these have made their way into the narrative concerning Krishn. As for (his consort) Rukmini (or Rukmani), Krishna had heroically eloped with her (at her request)... to prevent an unwanted marriage with Shishupal, the crown prince of Chedi (a vassal country under the suzerainty of Emperor Jarasandh of Magadh). Since Rukmini's father (Bhismaka) too ruled over a vassal country (under the suzerainty of Magadh), her ambitious brother, Rukmi, proposed that she be married to his friend Shishupal. But having heard much about Krishn... Rukmini had her heart set on him. However, Rukmi did not want to earn the wrath of the ruthless Jarasandh and so, convinced Bhismaka as well. Frankly, the Krishna-Rukmini story reminds me of the great Scottish novelist and an amazingly popular poet, Sir Walter Scott's lovely poem: Lochinvar. [This poem, once memorized by every schoolchild in Britain and Ireland and many others across the globe, is from his long narrative epic poem, Marmion.] Note: Even our raags/ragas were classified as 'husband', 'wife' and even 'son'. Rāginī is a term for the "feminine" counterpart or "wife" to a rāga. The rāga-rāgini scheme from about the 14th century aligned 6 "male" rāgas with 6 "wives" (rāginis) and a number of sons (putras) and even 'daughters-in-law'... none of which should be taken literally or at face value. Plus, the way Krishna is depicted, his attire, etc... perhaps can be traced back to the 'Bhakti Movement'. Krishna has been an integral part of the many indigenous reform and renaissance movements that has happened over the last millennium or so. These were able to undo/change and/or dilute several of the unwanted aspects/social ills, etc that had seeped into society and Sanaatan Dharm... by creating awareness, thereby changing mindset, perceptions, etc via stage plays, open air theatres, poetry, couplets, story-telling, books, paintings/visual arts/iconography, songs and music [also rendered by wandering minstrels] and the like.Also: all these stories involving Krishn, Rukmini, Narad Muni, etc are (very likely) later additions... for the purpose of stage plays, verses, poetry, and so on. It is unlikely that anyone else would have known what transpired between Krishn and Rukmini (since either of them is unlikely to have invited any witness.) [And this is also applicable to Rukmini's letter (to Krishn). It is unlikely that either of them would have shared its contents with other people. So, the version we have now... is (very likely) the outcome of later-day writers' and translators' imagination.] Besides, Krishn, the 8th Vishnu, was in his human form, and therefore, would not only have behaved like one; he would also have expected to be treated like a human. Therefore, he is unlikely to have behaved like the Lord of Creation with Rukmini, especially. Though it is quite likely that being an intelligent and perceptive person, Rukmini, like Arjun, (and maybe even Draupadi), probably - at some point - understood that her husband (Krishn) was not an ordinary human. But this is something Krishn himself never went around declaring/announcing. [As for Arjun, he was (at some point) able to see beyond the veneer... created by Krishn himself. ... And that is how the Srimad Bhagavad Geeta came about. And that is how Krishn's real identity became known to one and all.] It is quite possible, though, that Krishn was surprised at Rukmini's choice (of a veritable wanderer with a nomadic lifestyle) for a husband... since he was an extremely busy person (with barely any time for himself... courtesy all the 'push' and 'pull' and 'cross currents'.) He was a live wire, and led an intense life. He led a tough life full of stress, numerous pressures and high-velocity... and there was a multitude of tasks to be accomplished under very difficult/challenging circumstances. Krishn is detached from Rukmini in the sense that he is not concerned or bothered about whether she was beautiful or not or whether she was highly intelligent or knowledgeable or not and the like. [Though, given her background, she would certainly have been erudite and knowledgeable in a wide variety of subjects, besides (very likely) having many and varied interests. Therefore, they would have been intellectually quite well-matched and compatible, besides being emotionally suited to one another in terms of temperament. And, from what we can gather... they would have also looked stunning together.] It is unlikely that Krishn would have expected her 'devotion' (he was human, not a deity.) He saw her as a person, and accepted her the way she was. Rukmini, on the other hand, comes across as an intelligent, perceptive and balanced person. She does not come across as immature, boastful, envious, demanding, imprudent, petty or arrogant, or as someone given to sulking, either. In short, one can say that she was (in every way) worthy of being the consort of someone like Krishn. They (probably) were, what we call, soul-mates. [In case she were to be envious/jealous of him, meaning if there were to be "samudra-manthan" between them, that would have been an additional burden on Krishn, a mental as well as an emotional burden, that too. And that kind of mind games would have affected him (and perhaps even hurt him) in a manner that nothing else could ever have (including all the machinations of Jarasandh, Duryodhan, Shishupal, etc etc put together.)] Perhaps she was his anchor. Perhaps... she was able to understand Krishn (and his life)... and (hence) could become his anchor. His patience, magnanimity and forgiveness can be gauged from the fact that he is none other than God himself (albeit, in the flesh). And He remembers who he is, what his purpose on earth is (as well as all his previous incarnations/avatars.) The 'toxin' directed at him does not rile him: BG Chapter 9, verse 11: || avajānanti māḿ mūḍhā mānuṣīḿ tanum āśritam paraḿ bhāvam ajānanto mama bhūta-maheśvaram || ~ "The ignorant deride Me when I descend in the human form. They do not know My transcendental nature as the Supreme Lord of all that be." Krishn is a karm yogi and totally "detached" (one has to understand him, his life, his purpose, the path he tread and his karm to get this). He is a complete yogi... and yet, he is also the most magnificent householder (he was non-monastic; he did not renounce "home life".) He also comes across as spartan, effortless and sorted. And given that he is "Sahasrasirsa" ("with thousand heads") ~ he would also have been able to adapt to any situation or event.Krishn is referred to as 'hamsan'or 'ascetic'/'yogi' and/or is compared to the 'lotus' ~ due to his selfless service to society and humanity (Loka-sangraha or Loka Kalyana.) ['Karm Yogi' is not to be equated with 'workaholic', though. Do read the fourth paragraph from last... to know more about "yogi" and "detachment". Krishn did all that he did ~ through the sheer dint of his karm alone; his commitment and passion towards achieving his objectives is remarkable. So imagine the extent of his intellectual acuity, as well as the magnitude of his tenacity and determination; he not only put in his time but also his heart into it. And he was neither perfunctory nor condescending.] Krishn's ability to look beyond the "clutter" - whether with events, situations or with people, and focus (keep his focus, that is) on the essential aspects, is remarkable; maybe this was due to his "yogi" nature and his ability to "detach" himself. As for his parents: Krishn had two sets of parents: (what we understand now as) 'biological parents' (Devaki-Vasudev) and 'foster parents' (Yashoda-Nand). He was away (from the former) as a newborn (since he had to be spirited away to a safer place), while from the latter he was separated at the age of 5 or 7 (when he was sent away to study.) He would have met/re-connected with both sets of parents only after completion of his studies... very likely in his mid-twenties. But then, would he have really been able to connect? Taking up responsibilities, yes; but would there have been an emotional connect (from either side)? ~ Well, my guess is as good as yours. Also, there were other people who were related to him (but he is unlikely to have known them either) - and some of them had aligned their interests with Jarasandh and Duryodhan. [The Krishna-Sudama stories are (very likely) later additions - to teach morals, etc or, maybe, some other narrative made its way into the main narrative... 'coz Krishn is unlikely to have spent much of his childhood and the whole of his teenage years in the company of village boys (do refer to paragraph #6 from the top... to get the drift.) But he is, in all probability, likely to have taken along his parents with him... when he moved to Dvarka.]

[Pic:Gulmohar ('Gul' means 'Flower' and 'Mohr' is 'stamp' or insignia. However: "Gul"also means "Flower" and "Mor" means "Peacock"... and this seems more appropriate in summing up the physical appearance and beauty of this tree + flower. The latter is also known as Krishnachura or Krusnachura (Bangla/Oriya: 'crown of Krishna'). ~ And, as we know,Shamsundar Krishn is the personification of the king of seasons/Rituraj, spring.] ... Coming before us as personified spring is Shyamsundar Krishn... full of colour, joy, and ecstasy and dressed as a daring dramatic dancer. He is "all-attractive": at His charming best - with a mysterious or magical power to attract, and hold us spellbound. He looks like the full moon surrounded by its entourage of stars. His effulgent white turban appears especially splendid sitting obliquely on His head. It is decorated with bunches of flowers, sprinkled with fragrant reddish powder (pollen or "gulaal", or maybe even the flaming-red Gulmohar, also known as "Krishnachura" or 'crown of Krishna'), and surrounded by buzzing bumblebees shaking His peacock feather. His curly dark blue hair is tied back, and He wears glittering yellow garments just suitable for the spring season. A sachet of camphor is tucked in His gem-studded belt. While listening to the vasanta raga, Krishn holds a flute in His left hand and a ball of red powder (gulaal) in His right hand. Overjoyed at the sight of Krishna, the forest creepers display ecstatic dance. The gentle breezes from the Malayan Hills appear as a guru to teach the forest creepers how to dance. The beautiful mango groves with their blossoming flowers ap­pear like exuberant laughter. It appears as if they are illuminating the mango grove with pleasant effulgence. With their new leaves and fresh mango flowers they exhibit various mudras (hand positions) to go along with the song of the birds... that intoxicate everyone with their joyous singing. Bumblebees, cuckoos, and other exotic birds hum and warble pleasingly. The creepers dance along according to the instructions of the wind. The spring season arrives in the form of a playful lion cub showing his teeth as the stamens of the flowers. The south­ern breezes forced the chills of winter to depart. It appeared as if the nostrils of personified time had now opened and started breathing in and out. The juncture of winter and spring seemed like the period between boy­hood and adolescence. The tender creepers explode with new buds. The cuckoos sing a sweet melody. Though the southern breezes had begun, they were weak due to their lingering attachment to the Malaya Hills. It seemed the buds, birds, and breezes simultaneously awaited the depar­ture of the winter season. With their gentle humming the bumblebees inquire repeatedly from all directions about the location of spring. Moreover, immediately upon smelling the fragrance, the cuckoos took shelter in the treetops to savour the fresh mango blossoms. The forest welcomed the spring season with the sweet fragrances of fresh flowers. With the disappearance of winter, the forest beamed with delight. The creepers appeared to be smeared with rich aromas. Overwhelmed with joy, the birds sing happily. The Malayan breezes moving here and there carried the sweet flavour of fragrant flowers. With the chirping of intoxicated sparrows, even humans lose their grav­ity and feel a new energy flowing through them. Delighted, they submerge in an ocean of joy, as they smell the sweet aroma of the forest flowers. There is gulaal, flying of colourful (and even innovatively designed) kites, sumptuous feast and unlimited happiness during the Holi festival. A new zeal of life can be seen coming in all around. Colorful flowers decorate this earth. The bumblebees returning to their hives appear to be tied up together as they move about with each other. Krishn, the ocean of elegance, appears like a dramatic artist dressed in colorful garments. The camari deer prepared the stage by sweeping the forest floor with their bushy tails. The honey nectar dripping from the flowers moistened the rich soil. Wandering kasturi deer scented the air with the heady fra­grance of musk. Swarms of intoxicated bees danced in mid-air and buzzed among the flowering creepers. On Vasant Pancami, the first day of spring, Shyamsundar, whose joy­fully sweet and sportive nature spread in all directions, filled the horizon with the reflection of His beautiful blue complexion. Whose mind participating in this flourishing festi­val of spring will not elate? [Please note: All this is allegorical. The spring season is described... with Krishn as personified spring. Thus, He is Hari, the Lord of Nature. He is "Kshiteeshah": The Lord of the earth.] Here is the delectable Tagorean composition Aji Dokhino Duar Khola (by Sounak Chattopadhyay): Link. [Vasant Panchami is celebrated on the fifth day of Shukla Paksha of Magh Masa (month). It is the festival/celebration of the king of all seasons: Spring/Basant. This begins from spring season and carries up to Panchami of Krishna Paksha of Falgun month. This festival is especially considered significant for lovers of art and education. The day of Vasant/Basant Panchami is considered to be the beginning of life. Spring season is the season of rebirth and bloom. In this season, fields of yellow mustard, charm everybody's heart. Wheat crop starts swaying like gold. Colourful flowers starts blossoming. The day of Basant Panchami is (thus) celebrated as the welcoming of colours and happiness. And on this day, apart from Goddess Sarasvati (the goddess/deity/devi symbolizing learning/knowledge, intelligence and wisdom), Lord Vishnu (the Lord of Creation) and Kamdev (the god/dev of love) is also worshiped. As for Gulmohar: "Gul" means "Flower" and "Mohr" means "stamp". But (Gul = flower) and "Mor" means "Peacock"... and this seems more appropriate in summing up the physical appearance and beauty of this tree and flower.]

Krishna, who foiled Duryodhan's attempts to ascend the throne - 'coz if such a man and such a bunch were to reign, what would happen to society? Krishna, who successfully foiled Duryodhan and Dushshasana's shameful designs; Krishna, who despite not being present in Hastinapur, came to Draupadi's aid... at a time when even the likes of Dhritarashtra, Gandhari, Bheeshm Pitamah (grandsire), Dronacharya, et al stood silent - either due to narrow selfish reasons or so as not to displease Duryodhan. [Krishna was able to aid Draupadi through very advanced technology - despite not being physically present in Hastinapur at the time. The Krishna that appeared in the Hastinapur Court (and successfully foiled the shameful designs of Duryodhana and Dushyashana) - was his hologram. A highly advanced, realistic and human-like hologram or holographic image that not only looked like or resembled Krishna completely but was also able to perform a variety of tasks (including: inducing illusion and hypnosis, by gaining control over Dushyashana's senses or indriyas). Very likely: by gaining control over Dushyashana's mind and thoughts: advanced 'inception'. Result: Dushasana was led to believe that Draupadi's attire (it couldn't have been a saree, though) was an unending one; and so, he continued to 'unwrap layers and layers of it' (under hypnosis), and finally fell to the ground - exhausted.] Now, how did Krishn get to know what was unfolding in the Kuru Court (in Hastinapur)? The narrative says: Draupadi prayed to him, requesting assistance. This could be an allusion to "telepathy". Though we are aware of the concept of "telepathy", we are yet to figure it out fully. [Krishn and Draupadi were the best of friends, and so, Krishn may have shared the procedure with her.] Krishna, who promised Duryodhan his powerful 'Narayani Sena'; Krishna, who let Duryodhan rejoice - by agreeing not to pick up weaponry himself; Krishn, who thus was able to firmly remain on Arjun's side (as his 'charioteer', strategist and guide); Krishna, who quietly weakened Duryodhan (by weakening Karna - Duryodhan's greatest ally and 'instrument'). Karna was a Maharathi (great warrior). During the Pandava's 'vanvaas' (exile period or banishment) he helped Duryodhan become the ruler of a large kingdom, by conquering various lands. The kings of these lands either accepted Duryodhan's suzerainty and swore allegiance to him, or chose to die in the battlefield, defending their kingdoms. Karna is said to have thus subdued the kingdoms of Kamboja, Shaka, Kekaya (maybe beyond what Vrihadhakshatra ruled), Avantya, Gandhara (possibly: beyond the areas from where Gandhari hailed), Madraka (could be areas beyond Madra-raj Shalya's kingdom, from where Madri hailed), Trigarta, Tangana, Panchala (probably areas other than what came under Drupad's kingdom), Videha, Suhma, Vanga, Nishada, Kalinga, Vatsa, Ashmaka, Rishika and numerous others, including many forest tribes (vaanvasis and adivasis). [Karna was Kunti and Suryadev's son - begotten through advanced genetic engineering, probably far more advanced than the one used to 'create' Arjun - hence the metaphors of 'kavacha' and 'kundal'. It simply indicates that he was extremely difficult (almost impossible) to kill. But then, this 'kavacha' and 'kundal' would have been part of his physical (genetic) makeup, much like the proverbial 'second skin'... and not mere ear-rings and armour. *So, a lot more effort would have had to be expended to negate Karna's 'kavacha' and 'kundal'. In all likelihood, it would have involved highly advanced scientific procedure/technology. [As we can see, Krishna was extremely knowledgeable and a fine scientist (rather, technical wizard) himself.] Thus, the Karna-Kunti story - wherein a supposedly 'daanveer' Karna "donates" his 'kavacha' and 'kundal' is a result of later retelling - since the translators were unable to figure out the technology, etc... and so, improvised and re-wrote parts of the Mahabharata.] Kunti did not have to "abandon" Karna "for fear of being shamed." [In Dvapar, the male-female ratio was heavily skewed. Begetting progeny involved technology. And apart from Svayamvara, 'Gandharva-Vivah' too was prevalent. ['Gandharva Vivaha' was a short-term union (vivah) that did not require any rituals, though the consent of the female was essential. Now, it is possible that the concept of 'Gandharva-Vivah' came about due to the highly skewed male-female ratio, or, maybe, it was prevalent among certain groups of people... and later adopted by other groups.] Also, e.g. while Yudhisthir, Bheem and Arjun were known as "Pandav", they were addressed as "Kaunteya" (son of Kunti). For example, Krishna addresses Arjun as "Kaunteya" most of the time. Besides, all knew that Yamaraj, Pavandev and Indra were the respective fathers of Yudhisthir, Bheem and Arjun. Also, Kunti, Satyavati, et al wielded great influence. Thus, as we can see, there was no 'Lakshman Rekha' prescribed for women in Dvapar. That concept has come about thanks to Tulsidas and his Ramcharitmanas. Plus, it is very likely that concepts like 'widow' or 'widower' or even 'illegitimate child', etc was unknown.] So, there is no question of "abandoning" an infant Karna "for fear of being shamed." There was no need for Kunti to place the basket (supposedly containing the infant Karna) on the waters of the river Aswa (a tributary of the River Ganga) - as is popularly believed. Karna was an unnatural human (Kunti and Lord Indra's son) - born as a result of very advanced genetic engineering. In all likelihood, he would have been a radiant-and-remarkable-looking baby. And this may have induced someone to steal/kidnap him. But whosoever it was that kidnapped him, abandoned him later, since taking care of him may not have been an easy task - given that he was an unnatural human. Later, the childless couple - Adhirath and Radha found him, and brought him up as their own son. [Hence, Karna is also known as Radheya: son of Radha, though he was named Vasusena by his adoptive parents. Adhirath was a 'Suta' or 'Saarathi'. There were three kinds of warriors: Rathi, Maharathi and Saarathi (the latter, though highly skilled, did not pick up weapons.)] 

Let's discuss Karna's 'Kavacha' and 'Kundal' and *what* is meant by Karna's 'chariot wheel sank deep into the ground': Karna = ears. 'Kundal', literally 'ear-ring' is perhaps derived from "kundalini" (kuṇḍalinī), meaning: "coiled". Sanskrit: kund = "to burn"; kunda = "to coil or to spiral". And is perhaps a reference to the 'circuits', i.e. the nerve tracts or nerve fibers.) [Kundalini = a concentrated field of intelligent, cosmic, invisible energy absolutely vital to life; beginning in the base of the spine when a human being begins to evolve as wisdom is earned. Kundalini has been described as liquid fire and liquid light. The ultimate outcome of kundalini is the union of Will (sakti-kundalini), Knowledge (prana-kundalini) and Action (para-kundalini). (And this should help us gauge what kind of kundalini/'serpent power' Krishn and Chanakya possessed, or for that matter Chandragupta Maurya and Vikramaditya possessed.) In literal terms, the 'samudra-manthan' or 'sagar-manthan' tale is (also) an allegorical description of what transpires during a kundalini awakening process. Kundalini is a latent energy that lies dormant in the spine. Upon awakening, it rises in a sensation akin to a slithering reptile, up the spinal column (Meru-danda, also represented by Mount Meru in the story).] And if we are to look at the human brain: the left hemisphere (side 1), the right hemisphere (side 2) and the area in the middle is (allegorically) occupied by a 'serpent'! Therefore, we can say, kundalini is 'serpent power'. Maybe, this power 'ignites' or 'illumines' the mind, in a manner of speaking, that is... which in turn results in an awesome amount of intelligence, foresight, perception, vision, sagacity, etc, that in turn results in great deeds. It is, however, possible that this power ('serpent power') was mistranslated to mean 'a serpent's crown jewel' or 'the priceless jewel found inside the head of serpents'.] As per the narrative, Karna's 'chariot wheel sank deep into the ground'... and he was, thus, unable to recollect the 'mantra' (appropriate incantations) for unleashing certain weaponry. Now this 'chariot wheel' is not literal. Wheel = cakra or chakra, and (so, very likely) refers to Karna's mind chakra or Manasa Chakra, which is connected with most of the head (especially the brain), is a combination of sensing and intellect. Maybe: only by 'deactivating' Karna's "Kundal"... could this unnatural human, ('son' of Lord Indra, a higher being, and Kunti... begotten through very advanced genetic engineering) be destroyed; otherwise nothing else could destroy him (as indicated by the "kavacha" - that was part of his genetic makeup.) Hence, Karna could not have donated either his "Kaavacha" or his "Kundaal". Ever. [Perhaps, later-day translators, unable to figure out/understand the technology aspects described in the narrative, improvised by bringing in Brahmin's 'curse', Parasurama's 'curse', Sutaputra, fate, et al. But then, there were three kinds of warriors: Rathi, Maharathi and Saarathi (the latter, though highly skilled, did not pick up weapons.) A renowned "kusalavya" of that era was: Ugrasrava, son of Lomarsana, known as Sauti to one and all. Sauti is derived from "Suta". Kusalavya: (roughly translates to) a wandering poet, custodian of our history and heritage... they were greatly respected. Even Sanjay was held in high esteem.] Therefore, Karna's 'chariot wheel sank deep into the ground' could mean #1. His mind went blank. In other words: his memory failed. He suffered a blackout. #2. That all of Karna's 'indriyas' gradually stopped functioning; he was benumbed, stupefied (the mind, senses, will, etc). Krishna, the tech wizard that he was, perhaps made this happen (via technology or via some sort of mind-control/'inception' brought about by a combination of technology and Krishna's tremendous will power). He was known to possess vast knowledge of Yog (and Yog is not confined to any one field, it is a vast ocean of knowledge encompassing varied areas.) Besides, it is said that he had not only gained mastery over his own senses (indriyas), but also over those of others. Apparently, (and perhaps realizing that his "kundal" had been 'deactivated') Karna invoked the Arya dharmic tenets of "fair play" and "chivalry"... maybe in a bid to buy time (to get himself treated or rather, to 'un-stupefy himself': to 'pull out his chariot wheel that had sunk deep into the ground', that is.) Krishna then (sarcastically) asked him whether he ever walked on the path of righteousness and followed "fair play" and/or displayed "chivalry". Also, what happened to his sense of "fair play" and "chivalry"... when six great and experienced warriors (Maharathi) murdered Abhimanyu (who too had requested for a fair chance... to fight one-on-one)? Krishn further reminded Karna about the latter's role during: the fraudulent game of dice (that cheated the Pandavas out of their right and banished them for 13 long years instead); his willing participation in the various machinations against the Pandavas; his conduct when Draupadi was insulted, and when Kunti was treated shabbily, etc. Krishna further said that his (Karna's) demand for a fair chance was disgusting, since as an ally and co-conspirator of Duryodhan, he was not only privy to but was also a willing partner in all of the latter's heinous plots and crimes. [However, it is unlikely that Arjun had to use any astra to bring about Karna's end.] Note: Karna had been unleashing powerful weaponry (one after the other) directed at Arjun. [These weaponry were considerably more powerful than the ones Arjun unleashed.] However, thanks to Krishna's deft maneuvering of the 'chariot', none of them could find their mark. [Now, this 'chariot' could not have been a horse-drawn one. It was (very likely) a compact mechanized vehicle that could also be maneuvered to increase or decrease in size, as indicated by: Krishna pressing the 'chariot' with his foot so that it sank five fingers deep into the ground. Thus, one astra (the serpent shaft) aimed at Arjun's neck could only graze his 'kiriti' (his head/crown or headgear/helmet?) instead. Arjun, thus, escaped with minor injuries to his head.] Karna had aimed the serpent shaft (astra) at Arjun's 'kundal' (his head or rather, behind his ears), but an alert Krishna maneuvered the 'chariot' just in time (by lowering its height by five fingers)... and so, Arjun escaped with minor injuries to his head (crown, kiriti). ... With Karna gone, Duryodhan was greatly weakened... so much so that the course of this greatest of 'Dharm-Yudh' (battle of principles) was clear to one and all.

Krishn, a larger-than-life figure; Krishn, extremely resilient - true steel, pure damascene steel (alchemy at its finest) and wrapped in silk and velvet; Krishn, bathed in the complexity of real-life struggle; Krishna, totally divested of His godhood/miraculous powers/mythical abilities... navigating through (a maze of) shifting power centers, politics, diplomacy, et al... armed with only his brilliance and charm: observing, evaluating, assessing, networking, negotiating - sometimes with a gentle force of persuasion, (maybe even throwing in some platitudes or praise, even extravagant praise perhaps, as and when required. It's all part of Dandaniti.) Krishna, who used his overpowering but human wisdom and intelligence in the struggle for supremacy, resulting finally in the re-establishment of good over assorted negativities and of right over wrong. The tremendous political acumen of Krishna is highlighted in the way he used all the four principles of Dandaniti to destroy the malignant power centers, create new alliances that emerged as counter balances to the existing power structure and used diplomacy to bolster what was right. He used his basic superior intelligence for this one purpose. It took some time. It also took some effort (obviously, 'coz there's no switch, there's no quick fix, there's no magic wand, and the odds were great). But in the final analysis, he emerged as the leader whose judgment and veracity could not be disputed. His political acumen combined with his sharp intellect, personal courage and physical prowess established him as a major force.Krishna, did He return as Chanakya (Vishnugupt)? We do not know. And though this land wielded considerable influence even then (w.r.t education, innovation, research, knowledge, medicine, metallurgy, alchemy, literature, art, technical know-how, trade, et al), it was highly fractured. So, one can only marvel at how a brilliant, stoic and intrepid young man - with unmatched resiliency, vulcanized via the most trying of circumstances (and who went to Takshasheela at the age of sixteen, but had no practical experience whatsoever in the treacherous world of kutniti and politics) was (gradually) able to outmaneuver an assortment of experienced and powerful (albeit negative) entities, (from a position of weakness, yet again) + checkmated the rampaging Yavana Alexander... to unite a fractured nation and lay the foundations of a glorious era. He rejuvenated Arya-dharm too. There is also a strong possibility that Chanakya infiltrated Alexander's army by getting Chandragupta recruited into it. The latter's humble origins made no difference to the great Master, who also fortified Chandragupta Maurya's empire and its surrounding areas. Chanakya, a fine karm-yogi, remained steadfast, his eyes firmly fixed on a higher goal, a goal much higher than himself, despite the many insults, personal trials, tremendous odds and extreme 'agni-pareeksha' (the metaphoric 'trial by fire'). He was not petty or small-minded either, and recognized/acknowledged talent/calibre even in his staunch adversaries, and thus, was magnanimous enough to hand over the baton to Amatya Rakshash [actually: Amatya Kartikeya. Rakshash comes from Rakshak, meaning protector. Amatya = minister.] Chanakya cleverly brought Rakshash (loyal adviser and principal minister to the despotic Dhana Nanda) back from exile, received him with a great deal of warmth, and extended all due courtesies - thereby voiding the feud/bad-blood between them and un-demonizing Amatya Rakshash publicly. So overwhelmed was Rakshash by Chanakya's gracious behaviour (towards him)... that he accepted the responsibilities (entrusted to him) - with a full heart. Thus, Amatya Rakshash became Samraat Chandragupta's principal adviser and minister. [And given that Chandragupta's reign is one of our finest eras... we can gauge how well he discharged his duties. Chanakya, a great human and visionary. Chanakya, a brilliant political scientist. Chanakya, a master economist. Chanakya, a fine nation-builder. Note: Chanakya is addressed by two honorifics: Pandit and Acharya. "Pandit" indicates a wise, learned and enlightened person. "Acharya" means: "He who instructs through his own behavior (acharan)". That is the mark of a true teacher/guru. During Chanakya's time there was no 'caste system' (since "caste" is derived from the Portuguese word "Casta," meaning: purity of descent. Even the Gupta Emperors had humble origins.) Therefore, in all likelihood, "Pandit" and "Acharya" were honorifics given to anyone who deserved. A "Brahman" was someone who dedicated his life to the pursuit and dissemination of knowledge. They (Rishis, Maharshis, Munis and Acharyas of yore) also undertook various research and experiments. Vishnugupt Chanakya himself was a fountainhead of knowledge encompassing widely different areas such as economics, politics (as in 'raaj-neeti', nation-building), statecraft... and even medicine.] 

Krishn, "all-attractive" [Mohan]; Krishn, the magnificent; Krishn, the tremendously magnanimous; Krishn, a realist, a pragmatic doer, a go-getter... and not a mere idealistic dreamer. [He never said it cannot be done. Instead, he became the 'matsya-avatar' and went against the grain; he swam against the tide. And the planet, society and civilization benefited. The people benefited. Arya-Dharm was enriched. Sanaatan-Dharm was re-energized.] Krishn, who will return as Kalki, the 10thVishnu (to set the stage for Krita/Sat/Satya Yug of the next cycle to manifest); Krishna, (who, as the 8th Vishnu) was part of the 3rd era, Dvapar Yug - when Aryavarta was still Aryavarta, where people could still be called noble-natured or Arya/Aryan (i.e. they still followed a pattern of life based on Arya-Dharm, Arya ethics/code of conduct or a noble way of life - though this had suddenly crumbled due to the activities of assorted negative entities like Jarasandh, Kansh, Shakuni, Duryodhan, et al and their allies). [
This change had happened all of a sudden. Out of the blue. It was not gradual. Therefore, the kind of 'societal churning' it would have heralded too would have been great.] Krishna, (who, as the 8th Vishnu) was part of Dvapar... when indigenous peoples and entire civilizations had yet to be obliterated, when none indulged in un-Aryan activities like slave-taking, buying and selling of humans in markets, loot and plunder of resources, et al. In fact, enslavement was unheard of. Even the Sanskrit language has no equivalent for a slave. [Das/Dasi = attendant.] Dvapar was an era when by insulting Draupadi... Duryodhan and Dushshasana crossed a red line (i.e. they broke the prevalent tenets of Arya-dharm - Aryan ethics or code of conduct that people adhered to at the time.) Krishna, (who, as the 8th Vishnu) was part of a land and era/yug when vast quantities of highly destructive weaponry was a concern, when earthlings largely depended on advanced medical science/technology to beget progeny - due to an extremely skewed male-female ratio. Result? Unnatural humans - progeny of earthlings and entities of Higher planets/Urdhva-loka, 'born' due to highly advanced genetic engineering (including cloning), abounded the earth. For example: Arjun was Kunti and Lord Indra's son - begotten through advanced medical technology. Karna was Kunti and Lord Surya/Suryadev's son - again begotten through advanced genetic engineering, probably far more advanced than the one used to 'create' Arjun - hence the metaphors of 'kavacha' and 'kundal'. Bheem was (one of Indra's energy minister) Pavandev/Lord Pavan and Kunti's son, while Yudhisthira was Lord Indra's law and justice minister, Dharmaraj Yamaraj/Lord Yama and Kunti's son - yet again begotten through advanced medical technology. Nakula and Sahadeva were Madri's twin sons, courtesy the twin Ashvini Kumaras. They too were begotten through advanced medical technology/genetic engineering. [The Ashvins or Ashvini Kumars are the physicians of the Devas - entities/beings residing in the Higher planets/Urdhva-lokas. This Devaraj Indra, Suryadev, Dharmaraj Yamaraj, Pavandev and the Ashvins are not part of manav-jaati/human race/species.] While the Kauravas were born as a result of a 'test-tube' process, wherein even their gestation happened in pitcher-shaped incubators, outside their mother's womb. And given that Gandhari "gave birth to a hard piece of lifeless flesh" after "two years" of remaining "pregnant", one cannot rule out the involvement of stem cellsand cloning technology either. Advanced 'Parthenogenesis' was a possibility as well. Draupadi was 'fire-born', meaning: she was of 'virgin-birth' - the result of a laboratory process... with no human involvement whatsoever; hence her gestation too happened in incubators, which acted as the surrogate womb. Ditto Dhristadyumna. [Note: 'Homa' = a technological procedure. 'Brahma' = a reference to whosoever possesses the know-how (or is the chief scientist). 'Brahma's boon' = a reference to knowledge transfer or a successful experiment. 'Yagna' = a metaphor used to indicate a laboratory or a technological process per se. 'Yagya-gaar' = the laboratory or place where the research/process is being conducted. (Gaar = room, here it indicates a laboratory where a technological process is underway.) 'Yagnakunda' = a metaphor to indicate the 'specifics' of any laboratory or technological process. That is: the 'instruments' or the 'method' used or employed in any laboratory or technological process. 'Agni' = a metaphor to indicate the 'outcome' of a laboratory/scientific/technological/or medical process.]  


Devavrat aka Bheeshma Peetamah was 'Ganga-putra' - yet another metaphor for 'laboratory-born', 'pure-born', or of 'virgin-birth'. Thus he too was 'born' out of a laboratory process via highly advanced medical technology (that was way advanced than the one used to 'create' Draupadi). Devavrat was 'assembled' human - created after seven unsuccessful attempts - thus the metaphor of 'seven sons thrown into the Ganga'. This 'Ganga' refers to a lab; Maharaj Shantanu never had a consort/queen by that name. He fully understood the consequences of unnatural humans populating the earth, and hence was keen to have human progeny. Once he found 'matsya-kanya' Satyavati, they married. [Matsya-kanya: perhaps she belonged to a clan with a fish totem/insignia. There was a Matsya kingdom too. So, maybe she hailed from there.] Devavrat was the result of genetic material taken from multiple sources; therefore, he was very difficult (almost impossible) to kill, thus two metaphors: #1:  'ichchhya mrityu' and #2. 'shara-shajya' or 'bed of arrows' has been used (despite his years, and despite being grievously injured and in great pain, he was still alive.) [It is possible that Devavrat too understood the consequences of unnatural humans roaming the earth and its effect on civilization, and so, decided/undertook a stern vow (kathor vrat) - of not having progeny (i.e. replicating himself) - ever. This probably is the reason behind his other more famous name (sobriquet): Bheeshm or Bhishma (meaning, terrible - a reference to his vow, perhaps). There was no renunciation or sacrifice involved... to pave the way for Santanu-Satyavati's progeny to ascend the throne.] Ghatotkach too was 'laboratory-born'. [Ghatam indicates: laboratory. Utkoch or utkaca= reward, product, outcome, gift, present.] He was a highly advanced humanoid robot, very human-like in appearance (android - male), but with robot or machine-like strength, flexibility and assorted abilities. And so, he could increase in size and turn himself into a gigantic figure. [Maybe our ancients called such a humanoid, 'brahma-daitya' or 'brhma-daitya'. Brhma comes from 'Brh', which means: to grow. Daitya = gigantic-sized. And this (probably) got mistranslated to 'a brāhmaṇa ghost' or the ghosts of brahmans, living in the fig trees, the pipal (ficus religiosa), or the banyan (ficus indica), awaiting liberation (mukti) or reincarnarnation.] As for Dronacharya, Droṇa implies that he too was gestated in a droṇa(vessel) - an incubator that acted as the surrogate womb. Jarasandha (literally meaning "joined by Jara") too was a product of stem cell technology (gone wrong). Or he may have been a conjoined baby. Jara (or Barmata - an adivasi vyadh/doctor) either: #1. separated the underdeveloped-lifeless/stillborn twin (obviously via a surgical procedure) or #2. stitched up gaping wounds, perhaps even gangrene, or maybe 'completed' an 'incomplete' or ill-developed/underdeveloped human body - with the help of material/body parts taken from other sources (including the lifeless/stillborn twin). Thus Jarasandha lived. Even Dhritarashtra, Pandu and Vidur were 'born' due to advanced medical technology... courtesy MaharshiVedavyas. Perhaps the technique was yet to be perfected; therefore, none of them were 'born' completely healthy. [For example: Dhritarashtra was visually challenged, while Pandu was anemic and probably had a weak heart/incurable heart ailment. And neither could procreate naturally. Hence Gandhari, Kunti and Madri had to take the help of advanced medical technology - in order to beget progeny. Even Draupadi's five sons (one by each of the Pandavas): Prativindhya, Sutasoma, Srutakirti, Satanika, and Srutakarma... are said to have been spitting images of their respective fathers - the 5 Pandavas. This again points towards cloning. Therefore, 'the Pandavas announcing to Kunti their arrival with excellent "alms", and a supposedly busy Kunti replying without turning to look at Draupadi (who was the supposed "alms" referred to) and advising/ordering the brothers to share the "alms" equally amongst the five of them'... is a later-day addition, courtesy translators, who, unable to understand technology, etc... improvised.]

So, imagine, how different this planet was and how different the humans were. Therefore, every era/yug is very unlike the other. Nothing remains the same: flora, fauna, terrain, processes, systems, technology, society, challenges, et al... so much so that even the human race-species/manav-jaati are vastly different. Krishna, (as the 8th Vishnu) put a halt toall experiments directed at creating unnatural humans; Krishna, (as the 8th Vishnu) thus saved this planet from destruction, protected the human race-species/manav-jaati on earth from annihilation, helped stabilize civilization on earth, helped the human race-species/manav-jaati and civilization on earth to progress naturally and peacefully, and thus restored the gender balance as well. Krishna, who saved this land from large-scale destruction (courtesy Saalva's nuclear weapons - some 8/10 or maybe 12k years ago- saw his beloved city of Dvarka destroyed in the process); Krishna, (as the 8th Vishnu) once again rebuilt Dvarka by claiming land from the sea. [And if we are to examine the Indus seals... we can then see for ourselves how much embedded he is to the Sindhu-Sarasvati Sabhyata (Indus Valley Civilization). If only the Indus script/hieroglyphs had been deciphered...] Krishna, who founded the city of Pataliputra - 138 generations before the reign of Samraat Chandragupta Maurya. [The despotic Nandas' reign ended after their defeat at the hands of the Chanakya-Chandragupta combination. Maurya comes from 'Moriya' or 'Mura'. [Pali: Mora.] The Moriya/Mura clan probably was a clan with a peacock totem/insignia or even headgear, and hence, was called Moriya or Mura ('of the peacock'). It is derived from 'Mor' meaning, peacock. With time Moriya/Mura became 'Maurya'. The Moriya were peacock-feather gatherers and Chandragupta's mother hailed from this clan. There is also some indication that she was the chief attendant (dasi) of the despotic Dhana Nanda (with the latter siring Chandragupta)... and this makes Chandragupta a 'dasi-putra'. (Though some versions state that he belonged to a minor clan - the Moriya or Mura, and that his father was the chief of a forest area called Pippatavana/Pippalivana.) It is also believed that the Mura/Moriya clan was an offshoot of the Shakya clan - to which Prince Siddharth/Bhagavan Shri Gautam Buddh, the 9th Vishnu, belonged.] [Note: Gautam Buddh, as we know, traveled widely. He did not isolate himself in some remote corner; instead, he remained within society, engaged with the people (answered their queries, cleared their many doubts and confusions) and thus, disseminated his message of peace, karma and dharma (dhamma - in Pali). Apart from being a fine teacher (guru) and guide, he was also a reformer. Now whether he left his family - in wake of his quest for the 'truth' (dharma/dhamma, the right path, ethics or actions that benefit society) or met them whenever he could (i.e. whenever he could make time from all the traveling, sermons, meditation, et al) - my guess is as good as yours.] Krishna, (who, as the 8th Vishnu), had highly capable entities like Bheem and Arjun to assist Him (in Dvapar); Krishna (who, as the 8th Vishnu) was part of a great land, one whose influence was immense; Krishna (who, as the 8th Vishnu) was part of a land/world where processes, systems and people were greatly different, where dharma, karm, noble principles, et al had not yet fallen below the minimum level; Krishna (who, as the 8thVishnu) was part of Dvapar - a wholly different yug altogether... whence the 'Iron Age' of Kaliyug was yet to manifest. Krishna, who will return as Kalki, the 10th Vishnu, when the 'Iron Age' of Kaliyug will be at its peak; Krishna, who, as the Kalki-avatar/Lord Kalki... will thus be a one-man army (with none of the stature of Arjun or Bheem... or even Chandragupta Maurya to assist him this time); Krishna, who will return as the Kalki-avatar to a vastly different societal/world situation + manifold challenges (in Kaliyug). Krishna, of the enchanting smile - not a condescending smile, but a smile of reassurance; Krishna, who cannot be emulated. Ever. ['Coz none can even come close, let alone match a Maha Avatar (great incarnation).] Krishna, eternal inspiration; Krishna, of the remarkable clarity of thought and action; Krishna, one without ego or arrogance (ahankara), one never given to vainglory or boastful behavior; Krishna, an exceptional transcendental figure, one who truly mesmerizes; Krishna, a symbol of mystique, music, love (also in the wide or broad sense, that's why He is the finest karm-yogi), devotion and culture (as in, a cultured person: erudite, enlightened, witty, refined, polite and conscientious, not ignorant or narrow-minded); Krishna, the satyam-sivam-sundaram; Krishna, the indescribable, indefinable - a rock-star of the ineffable; Krishna, the Shyamsundar; Krishna, a God that unifies people.

The Mahabharata (to my mind, at least) is a completely different story. Its scale, sweep and grandeur are extremely overwhelming. It is part of our ancient history (pracheen itihasa) and has undergone numerous retelling over the years (centuries, millenniums, perhaps). Precisely how many retelling? We can only wonder and speculate. None of the current versions indicate anything about the geography or even how different the terrain/topography was, the difference in sea/ocean levels, what the flora and fauna was like; what kind of society prevailed in Dvapar or for that matter what kind of processes, systems, architecture, infrastructure, town planning, vimanas, modes of transportation, communication equipments, et al was part of Dvapar - an era which saw extremely advanced technology, an era when earthlings interacted with entities/beings from the Urdhva-lokas (Higher Planets). Also: what happened to all those equipments, etc? Was some of it destroyed? Were much of them carried away by these higher beings (to clear the earth)? Was all that knowledge lost, scattered and altered (with the passage of time) - due to the waves of exodus that happened post the drying up of the River Sarasvati? [The Mahabharata also talks about the River Sarasvati as a river in decline.] Besides, we do not get any clue regarding the human species of Dvapar: their physical appearance, height, structure, strength, capabilities, caliber, dietary habits, attire et al. Plus, there was a fantastic array of aerial vehicles and vimanas; there was interplanetary (not restricted to our solar system alone), inter-galactic and possibly, inter-universal space travel too. A Vimana could be made to become invisible - by 'Goodha', a mechanism that harnessed the powers, Yaasaa, Viyaasaa, Prayaasaa in the 8th atmospheric layer covering the earth, to attract the dark content of the solar ray, and then using it to hide the Vimana from the enemy. [This probably is a much much much-advanced version of the ADAPTIV Invisibility cloak that makes tanks disappear. ADAPTIV functions over infrared and other electronic frequencies. While it can blend the coated vehicle into the background, making it seem to be invisible, it can also shape the returning signal to appear like something else. A tank, for example, can be made to look like a car. The Mahabharata also mentions 'illusionary weapons'.] ... And to think that all this and much much more were known to our ancestors in greatly advanced versions!! There is also mention of three flying cities - known as 'Tripura'. [Is it a reference to artificial planets/space stations or artificial satellites (not the weather-report-gathering ones, though)? Or could it have been a far more advanced version of the International Space Station? - My guess is as good as yours.] Apparently: Shiva 'destroyed these cities by torching them out of the skies'. It probably means: they were eventually destroyed due to cosmic turbulence (euphemistically known as: 'tandav nritya').

[Pic: Horus, the Falcon-god or the Falcon-headed man.] |Many of our so-called mythological stories dealt with celestial events involving stars, planets, satellites, meteors and the like. Others narrated our 'pracheen itihasa'. However, due to a similarity of names, it is possible that many of these stories gradually came to be taken at face value. As a result: there has been a confluence of narratives. ... And this has also obliterated a lot of information and knowledge. Sadly. The word 'curse' (used in our ancient texts) also cannot and should not be taken at face value. This word appears in many of our texts essentially to convey: severe chastisement, physical violence, punishment, banishment, extreme humiliation, acute pain, illness, medical condition, unforeseen events, untimely demise, doing away with primogeniture, etc. We need to choose carefully after examining the narrative(s). Also: granted that people in the earlier eras (yug) were much different from modern humans of the current era (Kali Yug)... and so, their longevity too would have differed greatly. But that does not mean that human beings lived for thousands of years. And so, all those mentions of "thousand years" cannot and must not be taken at face value. "Thousand years" essentially meant a fairly long duration, 'coz when we bless someone by saying: 'may you live for a thousand years' - it is not literal. Sanjay was able to view the goings-on in the battlefield and simultaneously narrate the events to Dhritarashtra... thanks to television (divya-drishti) - courtesy Veda Vyasa. However, since the word "drishti" has been used, could it also have been an eye-wear/wearable gadget? Plus, what were all those 'chariots' like? Were they really horse-drawn ones as we think, or mechanized vehicles (since we use the word 'horse-power' - though no horses are involved)? We know ancient India was a hub of trade and had robust trading ties with other lands. [Foraminiferal microfossils, (around 4500 years old from the site of the Harappan settlement in Lothal), establishes that seawater once flowed in Lothal and there also existed a dockyard.] In Dvapar too there were healthy trading activities, bustling ports, dockyards, harbours and shipbuilding, (in fact, this land was renowned for building sturdy long-lasting ships). Now whether there were indigenous horses (that became extinct somewhere down the line, since Tibet seems to have sturdy, swift horses, that are also compact or small-built) - my guess is as good as yours. [However, what can be said with certainty is this: that there never has been a one-horned horse - the Unicorn, in reality. The Unicorn is imagery, to symbolically convey certain concepts. *Do refer to the unicorn seal above.] I also came across a bit about a Tibetan king joining forces with Chanakya and Chandragupta - against Alexander. [Maybe, we'll have to study Tibetan history and texts to know more.] Horses were imported from (what is now known as Central Asia) and ancient 'Arvasthan' (the Arabian Peninsula. 'Arva' meaning, 'horse' in Sanskrit, probably gave rise to the word 'Arab'. Arvasthan = the land of [fine quality] horses. PS: In ancient times there was no 'Central Asia', etc... 'Aryavarta'/land of Aryans or 'lands inhabited by the Arya people' stretched far and wide.) Also: one wonders as to how Samraat Ashok built all those stupas (enshrining the relics of the Buddha) in China? There is also an Ashoka Mountain and an Ashoka Temple there. So what was the map of his empire like? Besides: "Aryan" is not a 'race', but a 'way of life' rooted in noble principles. [People addressed each other as Arya, Arya-Putr, etc.] And there has never been any 'Aryan Invasion' whatsoever. Various groups of these noble-natured people (Aryan) migrated to other lands. [A deeper study of Vedic hymns and Avestic passages might throw more light.] Post the drying up of the River Sarasvati too, there has been an exodus westward - in search of greener pastures (and these ancient Indus people in all likelihood carried their culture, knowledge, heritage et al along with them - to newer lands.) But surely, intermingling with other groups and cultures would have resulted in 'cross-pollination' and synergy of all kinds. For example: Perhaps, the Vedic funeral altar (Smashaanacit or Smashaanachita) became the stepped pyramid - the great flat-topped Mastaba of Djoser, a precursor to later pyramids. [From what we can gather, the ancient Indus people, probably, buried their dead. In fact, if we are to study the many extinct groups, such as the Mayans, we find burial chambers and traces of elaborate burial rituals. Therefore, the funeral pyre probably came about much later (due to considerations of space, resources, etc.) Or maybe, both rituals existed simultaneously.] The Lion-Man (Nrsingh) probably became the 'Sphinx'. Perhaps Garuda gave way to Horus - the Falcon-god or the Falcon-headed man. [Incidentally: Garud was not an eagle or falcon per se, but a human belonging to the Suparnah clan (a group/clan with an eagle/golden eagle/bald-eagle totem or maybe a falcon totem/insignia and/or an eagle, golden eagle, bald eagle or falcon headgear/hairstyle (a la the Mohican) or mask). So imagine their physique and personality. They would certainly have been supremely fit: lithe, taut and sinewy, a coiled spring a la Bruce Lee (but much taller, of course. Though some groups may have been compact.) In India, the noble-natured Brahminy Kite (Haliastur Indus, Singapore Bald Eagle) is considered as the contemporary representation of "Garuda". Though birds of an earlier era would have been very different.] Perhaps, Eknath (meaning: one God) became Akhenaten (and even Echnaton, Akhenaton, Ikhnaton, and Khuenaten), while Dasaratha ("of ten chariots") or Tvesaratha (having splendid chariots), became Tushratta. Maybe: Ramesses II (referred to as Ramesses the Great), ancientMiṣr/Egypt's most prolific ruler, often regarded as the greatest, most celebrated, and most powerful pharaoh of the (ancient) Egyptian Empire, is named after Shri Ram. And perhaps 'Pharaoh' is a variation of 'Priyadarshi', meaning: pleasant-looking or 'blessed by the Almighty'. [Akhenaten was one of the first few kings who differentiated between his kingliness and the Godliness of Aten (The One).] Perhaps, Suryaman became Soloman. Maybe, Naram-Sin (also transcribed as: Narām-Sîn, Naram-Suen) is a variation of Narasimha or Nrsingh (the "Lion-Man"). Naram-Sin assumed the imperial title, "Lugal Naram-Sîn, Šar kibrat 'arbaim" (meaning: "King Naram-Sin, king of the four quarters".) Perhaps this is a variation of "Sarvabhauma" ("sovereign of the world") and"Cakravartin"or Chakravarti ("monarch of all realms") - brought about by a change in phonetics. The Kassite dynasty in Mesopotamia preserved some names: Shuriash, Maruttash, Inda-Bugash, (possibly Surya, Marut and Indra-Bhaga respectively; 'Bhaga' probably being a variation of 'Bhagavan', meaning effectively 'god', cfr. Bhag-wAn/Bhaga-wan, Slavic: Bog). ... Therefore, the language, phonetics, art, craft, culture, way of life, knowledge et al ... even the human species itself, has constantly evolved in every way imaginable. [One also finds step-pyramids in Mexico, El Salvadore, Guatemala and Peru (attributed to the Inca and the Chimu people) and even the Canary Islands. Beside ceremonial rituals, these pyramids were also associated with healing rituals, purgatory (possibly 'Panchakarma' or the Therapy of Purification), besides other rituals (during various equinoxes and solstices) involving the sun and the moon. Often they were built on a place where the Earth energies were high - specific grid points following the measurements of ancient Geometry (jyamiti: Jya in Sanskrit means earth, miti means measurement.) Siddhanta is the study of arithmetic (Ganita), trigonometry (TrikonaMiti), algebra (Beeja Ganita), geometry (Jyamiti or Gyamiti) and astronomy (jyotiṣa or Khagol shastra: jyótis - "light, heavenly body") and its application to astrology. How to compute the fundamental planetary positions pertaining to Hora and Samhita is explained in Siddhanta. Vedic Astrology, Vedanga Jyotishya, aka ancient Indian astrology has three branches called Siddhanta, Samhita, and Hora. The word Hora originates from the Sanskrit word Ahoratri, which means day and night. The Surya Siddhanta is one of the earliest doctrine or tradition (siddhanta) in archeo-astronomy of ancient India. Bhaskaracharya II's  Surya Siddhant discusses the force of gravity, 500 years before Sir Isaac Newton. The Romaka Siddhanta (literally "Doctrine of the Romans") is an Indian astronomical treatise, based on the astronomical learning of Byzantine Rome. "We owe a lot to the Indians, who taught us how to count, without which no worthwhile scientific discovery could have been made." - Albert Einstein.] Thus, due to the passage of time and given all the 'cross-pollination' etc, there has been a great deal of all-round changes and synergy creation. Not that the people who stayed back (i.e. did not migrate to other lands) stagnated. They too experienced ample amounts of cultural exchanges and opportunities to intermingle with other groups (both indigenous and external) - and this gave rise to newer aspects. And all these discussions, diverse viewpoints, exchange of opinion, etc over generations and centuries - have given us our vast repository of ancient texts. [Maybe, what began as the proverbial gush of a fountain or stream eons ago... gradually branched out into numerous tributaries... all of which merged into the same ocean. Thus, what is today known as 'Hinduism', contains many diverse and variant beliefs such as Advaita (monism), Dvaita (dualism), theism (āstika) and the like; there are diverse opinions about the seen (manifested/vyaktah/Saakar Brahmn) and the unseen (unmanifested/avyaktah/Niraakar Brahmn)... besides an assortment of views on the origin, purpose, and fate of the soul. So on and so forth. This egalitarianism, this pluralism, this all encompassingness, this ability to live in harmony with diverse thoughts and viewpoints, has been our strength. It has been our greatest strength. Thus, Sanaatan Dharm is one with the World Spirit. Also, Sanaatan Dharm, a 'way of life', which essentially was all about living in harmony with nature, performing one's karm yog/action, pursuit of knowledge, becoming higher spiritual beings, connecting with the Higher Self or seeking communion with the Universal Consciousness (Sat-cit-ānanda: eternal bliss of self-realization), etc... gradually learnt to worship idols and build temples. Courtesy the Greeks, and perhaps also the Buddhists.]

From our pracheen itihasa what we can gather is this: that the people of ancient times not only possessed the most vaulting imaginations but also very, very advanced technology - that to us seem like 'magic'. They had much more sophisticated technology at their disposal than most of us moderns (given our linear view of history) - are willing to give them credit for.

The original poem that Maharishi Krsnadvaipayana Vyasa (better known as Veda Vyasa) composed... contained some 8,800 shloka and was known simply as Jaya, since it covered the history of the 'Dharm-Yudh' (battle of principles) between the two factions of the Kuru family (and their respective allies). However, over a period of time, Vyasa himself (is said to have) expanded it to a larger work numbering 24,000 shloka, which he then renamed Bharata, for it was no less than the history of the Bharata race (lineage, people) itself, and while the 'Dharm-Yudh' (battle of principles) was the central matter, it was preceded and afterceded by several other narrations as well. But after the great retelling consuming twelve years of the 'yagna' (a 'scientific procedure' to correct 'Kaalsarpa Dosha' - a Biomagnetic genetic disorder, the Biomagnetic field being a subtle representation of the physical body, or maybe some other type of 'Sarpa Dosha'/'Nag Dosha') of Raja Janamajaya/Janamejaya, it has burgeoned to the mammoth size of a hundred thousand shloka. In this epic form, the poem is now known by one and all as the Maha-bharata - or the Great History of the Bharatas. And it is by this name that Veda Vyasa has consented to have it known, although he himself preferred the original title of Jaya(Victory). [Note: A genetic disorder is an illness caused by abnormalities in genes or chromosomes. If you observe the shape of DNA, it resembles two snakes coiled together (something we now refer to as: DNA coiled into the double helix structure as a ladder, a twisted rope ladder, or a spiral staircase). In ancient times, our Rishis/Munis (learned persons) visualized everything... and thus (euphemistically or maybe symbolically) referred to DNA as 'Sarpa', and any disorder in the DNA was hence termed as 'Sarpa Dosha'. Dosha = bio-energies found in our body.*Please refer to Draupadi's 'birth' process discussed above - to know more about what 'yagna', 'yagna-gar', agni', etc meant. Thus, a big chunk of the 'yagna' etc mentioned in our ancient texts is not to be taken at face value. It is merely a reference to one or the other scientific or medical procedure. From the narrative we can figure out what sort of procedure has been indicated. Also, do take a look at the logo of the Indian Medical Association.] Janmejaya's father (and Arjun's grandson), Parikshit, (derived from the word "Parikshan" - indicating a 'test' or 'procedure', unnatural human?) is said to have ruled for sixty years. With him too there is a 'sarpa' involved (though the story has largely been mistranslated). This 'sarpa' is indicative of some genetic disorder... that cut short his life. Probably Rishi Shameek and his son (Shringi) diagnosed this disorder, but were unable to cure/eliminate it. Perhaps during the procedure itself or while undergoing therapy the disorder aggravated and/or his body reacted negatively to the therapy/medication and thus, Parikshit died (as indicated by 'Takshak hiding himself within an apple'.) Thereafter, his son Janmejaya succeeded him... and promptly took remedial measures - to eliminate/correct his own genetic anomaly/disorder ('Sarpa Dosha' or 'Kaalsarpa Dosha'). In all likelihood, Janmejaya probably engaged a battery of renowned Maharshis, Rishis and Munis (to conduct research and experiments... so as to find a remedy.) And this time - after twelve years' of continuous effort - they were successful.] (PS: All of this is part of highly advanced science... it cannot be a mere figment of anyone's imagination. ~ It is not possible to conjure up stories involving advanced biotechnology and genetics! ... It could not have been a twelve-year-long ritual per se, either. ~ 'Coz Sanaatan Dharma assimilated the concept of temples and worshipping of idols from the Greeks and (perhaps) even the Buddhists; neither of whom were contemporaries of Pareekshit or Janmejaya.)

Vyasa composed his Mahabharatain three years, aided by Lord Ganesh. [Now, this 'Lord Ganesh' is very likely a reference to the most intelligent, perceptive and wise person of his time, who also assisted Veda Vyasa in writing this epic 'maha-itihasa'. Shri Ganesh represents: great retention power or vast intelligence (as symbolized by the elephant head and elephant's memory). The elephant-head: represents calm disposition, intelligence, perceptiveness, knowledge and wisdom. The small eyes = concentration. The small mouth and the bent trunk (Vakra-Tunndda) = less noise, more efficiency (opposite of 'empty vessels makes the most noise'). The bent trunk indicates: one who is not given to boasting or talking unnecessarily; in other words: one who is not ignorant. The big elephant ears = great listening ability ('listening', not merely 'hearing').] Apart from its poetic qualities, because of its significance, the Mahabharata is also known as the Fifth Veda. Thus, it is at once equivalent to all the Vedas. This towering itihasa captivates with its grandeur, its majesty, its wisdom, its knowledge, its lessons and its wonder. [However, one only wishes that it had been spared all those retelling and re-writings. Or, at the very least, the original had somehow remained unaltered, and that all those retelling (over the millenniums) came with an appropriate rejoinder. Alas. Imagine the knowledge and information that has been obliterated forever. And for any history-loving epicurean it is a great loss, indeed.] There must be hundreds of versions, interpretations and retelling of the Mahabharata already in circulation (even some five millenniums down the line). Great authors, poets, actors and playwrights have mined it for material on which to base their own creative works: from Goethe to Andy and Larry Wachowski (The Matrix). So one can only wonder how many more preceded them. This immense trove of knowledge, wisdom, philosophy, literature, karm-yog, dharma, sacrifice and narration is timeless, (in the sense that) echoes of events and characters (from the Mahabharata) have been seen and found through the ages: great wars fought, the consequences of unleashing fearsome weaponry seen, untold miseries wrecked upon people and nations witnessed, families torn apart, palace intrigues and power games, maneuvers on the world chessboard, great strategists and evil geniuses, people and forces working tirelessly to ignite a war while some going to great lengths to avoid such misadventures, failings of great personalities and their consequences, the rise of unlikely heroes, various chakravyuh (encirclement) formed and broken, risk-takers, selfless people who have had the courage to give their all - for the common good (not unlike the exceptional warrior Abhimanyu, who, in spite of being fully aware of the consequences volunteered to enter the 'chakravyuh' - so as to deny Duryodhan+ the upper-hand... during the most crucial juncture in this greatest of 'Dharm-Yudh'/battle of principles. Hence he is considered as 'the bravest among the brave' and 'the epitome of bravery'.) So on and so forth. [Ahbimanyu single-handedly and valiantly fought against many, and was finally 'mortally wounded' by the combined attack of six warriors, including Dronacharya, Kripacharya, Karna and Ashvatthama. However, since he was an unnatural human, this 'mortally wounded' bit may have to be seen in that context.] Duryodhan relied heavily on Shakuni's cunning. So much so that the latter became an integral part of Hastinapur... as Duryodhan's principal adviser. [He was manipulative and exerted a great amount of control over Duryodhan.] The Pandavs had been cleverly exiled/banished by Duryodhan (on the advise of the wily Shakuni) for a period of 13 years (with the possibility of another 13-years of banishment looming in the horizon). Meanwhile, Duryodhan and his allies were consolidating their position (both within and outside of Hastinapur). Had they succeeded, imagine the scenario, the consequences... and its lingering effects. If we can visualize all of this... the sweep, the technology, the situation, the political scenario at the time, the many 'cross-currents', the vicious forces allied together, the ones who were in a dominant position (and their intentions), the stakes involved (i.e. what all was at stake), how complicated and difficult the situation was, the vision and foresight, the level of leadership, the steadfastness, the selflessness, the strategy, tactics, planning, diplomacy and patient negotiations involved, the ability to guide and find solutions, what was successfully averted, the dedication, grit, single-minded determination and 'karm-yog' that made it possible, et al - it will give us a clearer picture of this timeless inspirational figure Krishn, and his brilliance (figuratively referred to as 'Sudarshan Chakra'.) [Su = good, auspicious. Darshan = appearance. It refers to Krishna's charismatic presence, personality and handsome looks. [Sudarshanah: He whose meeting is auspicious.] Thus, Krishna himself is 'Sudarshan Chakra'. Chakra = wheel. The name is derived from the Sanskrit word for "wheel" or "turning". The word dharma-chakra, or the wheel of the Law, is often used to describe the teachings/message of Shri Gautam Buddh. In other words: his teachings/message is expressed as: "the turning of the wheel of the Law." Chakrasare centers of Prāṇa, life force, or vital energy. Chakras correspond to vital points in the physical body i.e. major plexuses of arteries, veins and nerves. The 7 Chakras are the energy centers in our body in which energy flows through. However, the 'chakra' in 'Sudarshan Chakra' is a reference to the mind chakra or Manasa Chakra, which is connected with most of the head (especially the brain), is a combination of sensing and intellect. That's the ability to see and hear the world, to make sense of things, sort them out, and figure out how they all fit together. Possibly this is the intuition aspect of the (metaphoric/symbolic) third eye. The Manas ("Mind") Chakra, or Mind Lotus, is said to have six petals, which although normally white assume the colours of the senses when they operate (according to the Indian systems, in addition to the five physical senses, there is "mind" constitutes the sixth sense, which is not the same as Clairvoyance or "Sixth Sense"), and is black during sleep (unconsciousness). Note: The correct spelling is cakra, though pronounced with a ch. The word was also a metaphor for the sun, which "traverses the world like the triumphant chariot of a cakravartin." (ruler, also: 'monarch of all realms') and denotes the eternal cycle of time called the kalacakra, or wheel of time. A Chakravartin is a 'wheel-turning' king/chakravarti-raja, a wise and benevolent ruler, and an ideal king. Turning his 'chakra'(i.e. by using his wisdom, intellect and resources optimally), a 'wheel-turning' king advances without hindrance, overthrows his enemies, establishes peace, and rules with justice and benevolence.] 'India' comes from Megasthenes''Indica'. India is also: Bharatavarsha or Bharatadesam [meaning: Land/Bhoomi of the Bharatas or "cherished land". Bharatavarsha: the continent ('varsha'; Sanskrit) that is dedicated ('rata') to light, wisdom ('bha'). Yet another name is  Jambudveepa or Jambadveepa. Jambu or Jamba = Indian blackberry. Maybe there was an abundance of this tree (obviously a much different version of what we have now)... and hence the name. Thus, Jambudveepa = island of the Jambu/Jambul/Indian blackberry trees. Or perhaps, ancient India was shaped like an Indian blackberry.] 

Dvarka (also known as: Dvaravati, Dvaramati and Dwaraka) was built after claiming 12 yojanas of land from the sea. The foundation of boulders on which the city's walls were erected proves that the land was reclaimed from the sea. The Mahabharata has references to such reclamation activity at Dvaraka. Seven islands mentioned in it were also discovered submerged in the sea. Dvarka was a well-planned and prosperous city with a modern and technologically advanced harbour suitably designed to deal with the marine traffic of large ships entering the port. It is referred to as 'Golden City' in the Srimad Bhagavad Geeta, the Mahabharata, Harivamsha and other texts. [Therefore, one can only marvel at the level of urban and rural civic amenities and infrastructure, besides, trading, employment, education, healthcare, energy, water efficiency and so on.] One of the verses in the Bhagavada says: 'The yellow glitter of the golden fort of the Dvaraka City in the sea throwing yellow light all round looked as if the flames of *Vadavagni came out tearing asunder the sea'. This indicates the immense majesty of this city; it certainly would have been a sight to behold! But could it also mean that Dvarka was an energy hub? Solar energy, for example? Maybe even wind energy (compact floating windmills or even portable ones)? Perhaps they tapped 'vajra' (vajr) or thunderbolt too? Or maybe the ocean floor? Probably even Bioenergy/biofuel/biodiesel (from algae having high oil content? May not have been blue-green algae, but some other algae that could produce high quality biofuels at low cost. Even biofuel produced from grass, for that matter. One can only marvel at the biotechnology involved. As for 'The yellow glitter of the golden fort of the Dvaraka City in the sea throwing yellow light all round...': Solar energy: not via solar panels, but through 'artificial leaves'. Maybe they learnt from nature and developed 'artificial leaves' - devices that could employ sunlight to split water into its elements, hydrogen and oxygen. The hydrogen thus produced could then be stored in fuel cells and used for energy production. (The energy captured by leaves via the process of photosynthesis is about 100 terawatts - about six times the annual power consumption on our planet.) Maybe the artificial 'leaves' were placed in water under sunlight, and connected to a fuel cell; maybe they developed 'artificial trees' too; and all this supplied enough electricity for households, etc. (Perhaps, 'artificial leaf' can produce far more energy than a natural leaf.) Probably they figured out that the process of photosynthesis could be copied to produce hydrogen (by the action of sunlight on a membrane prepared from say spinach protein or perhaps from lotus leaves. Or perhaps with the help of artificial/semi-man-made enzymes or tissue?) Maybe they developed glass windows (incorporated with dye-sensitized solar cells in the material to produce the power. Probably they invented a film (containing metal nano particles incorporated into it in a composite matrix) that could be sprayed on window glasses, thereby converting them instantly into solar panels. Perhaps they also invented paints (with solar cells embedded within the paint) that could generate electricity. (Maybe they used porphyrin and cobalt, or some other material, to achieve this high efficiency, thereby mimicking the property of photosynthesis used by plants. The cells probably had a greenish tint a la chlorophyll (present in leaves and which converts solar energy.) [*Vadavagni is a form of Agni (fire) and is depicted as a mare that breathes fire. Agni/fire is the foremost among purifiers. Agni has been worshipped since time immemorial... throughout 'Aryavarta' ('Arya-lands' or 'land of Aryas/Aryans'; in other words, 'land inhabited by Arya people' - noble-natured people who followed a pattern of life based on noble/Arya tenets/principles. Not that there was any do's and don'ts; Aryan-ness was simply their 'way of life'; they were inherently noble-natured.) There are more hymns to Agni in the Rg Ved than to any other God/dev. Agni is also one of the five elements ([maha]panchabhuta or Pancha Bhuta). The others being: air (vayu), water (jal), earth (prithvi) and aether (aakash, space).] Apparently, Krishna engaged Vishvakarmaa to build the city of Dvarka, however, Visvakarma indicated that the task could be accomplished only if Samudradeva, the lord of the sea, provided some land. Thereafter Sri Krishna worshipped Samudradeva, who was pleased and gave them land measuring 12 yojanas, following which Visvakarma built Dwaraka, a city in gold (possibly indicative of a 'prosperous city'). Now this 'Vishvakarma' is very likely a reference to the best architect of that era. [Perhaps, 'Vishvakarma' was a 'title' bestowed on the best architect in earlier eras/yug.] And this 'Samudradev' is probably a reference to someone adept at building structures on seas (samudra). Therefore, 'Sri Krishna worshipped Samudradeva, who was pleased and gave them land measuring 12 yojanas,' means: that Krishna engaged this great and renowned engineer (title/honorific: 'Samudradev') who knew how to build structures on seas... and who then claimed 12 yoganas of land (from the sea) to enable the architect/'Vishvakarma' to plan and build the city of Dvarka. Therefore, Dvarka was not the result of seismic and volcanic activity at the junction of several tectonic plates. [Or maybe it was a bit of both: man-made as well as natural causes.] So imagine the level of engineering and architecture! Dvarka vanished under water, and there could be three reasons for this: #1. A tsunami; #2. The gradual movement of the sea; and #3. A massive earthquake. 

Was it a tsunami? Was it an earthquake? Or was it due to the rise in sea levels, brought about by various climatic factors? Well, studies show that sea level was 100 meters below the present sea level 15,000 years BP (before present), rose steadily and was 60-70 metres below present sea level 10,000 years BP (before present). In the next 1500 years it reached to 40 metres below present sea level, came at par with the present sea level around 7000 years BP, then rose by five metres in the next 1000 years. Thereafter, there was a gradual fall and sea level came down to 20-30 metres below present sea level about 3500 years BP. Again levels rose to above 5 metres present sea level about 1000 years BP. In the last 1000 years, the sea level has come down to the present position and is now stationary, but may rise in future. As per science constructions can be made on a land reclaimed from sea. However, when sea level rises, these settlements are first to get submerged. Dvarka, (therefore, probably) submerged due to rise in sea level. However, since there are evidences that a tsunami hit the western coast of India about 8000 years before present (BP), we cannot discount the possibility that a tsunami may have drowned the ancient city of Dvarka. This is how the Mahabharata describes it: 'The sea, which had been beating against the shore, suddenly broke the boundary that was imposed on it by nature. The sea rushed into the City of Dvarka. It coursed through the streets of the beautiful city. The sea covered up everything in the city. I saw the beautiful buildings becoming submerged one by one. In a matter of a few moments it was all over. The sea had now become as placid as a lake. There was no trace of the city. Dwaraka became just a name, just a memory'. Therefore, a deluge may have been the reason for Dvarka to vanish under water. But there is also evidence of at least three large killer earthquakes about 1500, 3000 and 5000 years BP (before present) respectively. Geomorphologic evidences also show that the Northwestern part of the Indian landmass was seismically active during the last 10,000 years. These killer quakes are likely to have caused the shifting of the rivers and sea level fluctuation (and maybe even resulted in the sinking of the legendary city of Dvarka.) Apparently Krishna alerted the people of Dvarka - that once he departs there would be no one to save Dvarka; that the sea would claim Dvarka... and so, advised the denizens to leave for safer places. [The sea engulfed Dvarka after Lord Krishna's disappearance. And what we can gather is this: that Arjun took them to safety. (Perhaps, as per Krishna's instructions.) But here too, the narrative is filled with later-day inflections and interpolations. PS: There have been several Dvarka... and all of them submerged due to one or the other reason. Modern-day Dvarka is (apparently) the 7th such city to be built in the area.]

Krishna's ability to read a situation, judge it correctly and then plan accordingly; his perception and discerning, his ability to observe, assess and evaluate any situation, force or entity... is amply demonstrated by his treatment of Duryodhan (plus allies) as well as his treatment of  Jarasandh (and allies). These entities were wayyy powerful and influential than him. They wielded far greater clout vis-à-vis him. In fact, there is no comparison in these matters between Krishna and Duryodhan (plus allies), and Krishna and Jarasandh (plus allies). Besides, certain members of Krishna's own clan and family were assisting Jarasandh. For example: His maternal uncle Kansh, and his cousin Shishupal (who was also abusive to Krishn, in public), had allied themselves with the imperialistic ambitions of the nefarious Jarasandha (the powerful ruler of Magadh.) Kansh had even let himself be manipulated by (his friend) Jarasandh... and dethroned (and imprisoned) his own father, the aged Ugrasena (besides imprisoning Krishn's parents, Devaki and Vasudev). Even Kritavarma sided with Duryodhan and the Kauravas, while Balaram chose to remain neutral. [Krishna, of course, chided him for that.] Jarasandh (with a much bigger army, allies, resources et al) fought Krishna 18 times. And yet, the latter was able to stave them off. This, no doubt, would have frustrated Jarasandh. Thereafter, Krishn shifted to Dvarka (a city he built by claiming land from the sea, and a veritable island) - to avert destruction, loss of lives and property (and possibly to also avert Jarasandh's crudeness and un-Aryan-like activities (such as, loot and plunder, maybe even imprisonment and torture of citizens, and who knows, could be even enslavement too), besides the sowing of the proverbial negative aspects (that would have completely changed the 'way of life', 'coz Jarasandh was no worse than Duryodhan) - in case he were to gain the upper-hand.) As we can see, Krishn was both humane and a realist, but also a great strategist... and not an arrogant, egoistic, self-seeking megalomaniac by any stretch of imagination; that he was very unlike Jarasandh, Duryodhan, etc. Krishna bide his time, chose the moment of action and the 'instruments' of action with precision... and thus reinstated the old Ugrasena back on the throne. The opposite of Jarasandha in his goal, Krishna would be no 'samrat' (emperor)... for his status is that of 'svarat/svarāṭ' (one who removes tyrants and self-aggrandizers, those who establish hegemony and dominate other humans to the detriment of the earth and civilization on it, and other such negative entities.) The fall of Jarasandh restored independence to nearly a hundred chieftains/kings, freed various clans and indeed the whole country of the spectre of the (proverbial) all-constricting imperialistic Magadhan python. Here is the idea of loka-sangraha ("welfare for all" or the "common good") exemplified. Krishna's brilliance, his overwhelming intelligence, far-sightedness and motives are precisely what should have engaged and inspired the likes of Dhritarashtra, Dronacharya, Bhishma Pitamah, et al: to shun inertia, to overcome negative thoughts and narrow selfish motives and to perform their 'karm' - to rejuvenate 'dharm' (noble principles/'Arya-Dharm' or actions that benefit society). In short: loka-sangraha or loka-kalyana ("welfare for all" or the "common good"). Krishna was not motivated by personal glory. He did not have a vaulting self-image (i.e. he was not full of himself, nor was he a legend in his own mind.) He did not annex territories either (e.g. he installed Jarasandh's son Sahadeva, as the ruler of Magadh. Sahadeva became an ally of the Pandavs. Even Dhrishtaketu, Shishupal's son and the ruler of Chedi, was a Pandav ally.) Krishn did not indulge in un-Aryan activities like loot and plunder either. Whatever he did was for the greater good; he dispelled negative thoughts (such as fear and hopelessness) from people's minds and hearts, he rejuvenated/awakened society (by removing an assortment of tyrants and other such negative entities), he rejuvenated/awakened 'Arya-Dharm, he also halted all experiments directed at creating unnatural humans (thus the earth was rid of highly destructive weaponry, unnatural humans, humanoids, et al). And all this enabled the planet and society to gradually "heal", it allowed humanity, society and civilization to flourish well. It also helped create a new and peaceful world, so to speak. Krishna's thoughts and actions personifies 'Loka Kalyana' (welfare for all). His was Nishkam Karm (selfless action) at its finest; he simply performed his duty ('karm') without expecting anything in return. The whole life of Lord Krishn is thus like the roaring sound of a conch. He undertook a vow: to fight an assortment of negative aspects and entities (despite great odds and obstacles)... so as to restore peace, order and balance in society and civilization (and did his best to fulfill it.) Thus, he is a true 'karm-yogi'. And thus, in spite of being a Maha Avatar (great incarnation), and in spite of being part of a different era/yug (dvapar), it is the very human-ness of Krishna that is part of his aura and charm, and is also behind the irresistible fascination that he exercises and exerts over millions (transcending eras/yug.) The remarkable qualities of the head and the heart (noble virtues/sattva guna)... that makes Krishn pre-eminent among statesmen, counselors, diplomats and philosophers as well as among leaders of people and nations shines forth brilliantly. Thus, he is also a transcendental legend, a magnificent 'Yug Purush' (The Renaissance man/Millennium Man/Man of Destiny or the Timeless Man) and Bhagavan (possibly derived from 'Bhagyavan', meaning: the 'Fortunate One' or the 'Blessed One'. Sri Krishn has transcended eras/yug, his 'karm' and his philosophy is timeless, he continues to inspire.) The renowned American thinker, poet, author, historian, philosopher and leading transcendentalist, Henry David Thoreau said, "A man is wise with the wisdom of his time only, and ignorant with its ignorance." This is true of people like us, because we are mere ordinary mortals, ordinary people. But, in every era (yug), a handful of people appear amidst us once in a while, who prove to be an exception to this rule. At one level, these exceptional and extraordinary people are products of their time. But at another level they transcend their times. Their perceptions, their insights, their thoughts, their actions and their concerns are truly universal, in time and in space; they are neither constrained by the circumstances of their birth nor are they limited by the ignorance of their time. They are truly incomparable. Krishna is the foremost of such exceptional transcendental 'Yug Purush'. [Ditto Chanakya Vishnugupt, who rid the country of yet another (proverbial) all-constricting imperialistic Magadhan python, Dhana Nanda, as well as the rampaging Alexander, in another era. Perhaps even Samraat Chandragupta II Vikramaditya... who, by thwarting the designs (imperialistic ambitions) of the Sakas, and driving them out of wide swathes of land, (probably almost the whole of modern Asia)... established peace and prosperity under his wise, benevolent and enlightened rule. He assumed the title of Vikramaditya. Vikram means: one who is wise, diligent, brave and strong as well as victorious. The Sanskrit word -kram is a root word meaning 'step or stride', so the name Vikram can be understood to mean Vishnu's stride in itself, or as a name which reflects the qualities of Vishnu's stride. In Vedic scripture, Vishnu's stride is said to be over the Earth, the Sky, and the all-pervading omnipresent essence of the Universe/Cosmos. Hence Shri Vishnu is also known as Trivikram. Aaditya = the Sun. Therefore, Vikramaditya roughly translates to: the radiance of Vikram.*] Krishna, the Renaissance Man, is (therefore) timeless. He belongs to all eras/yug. His wisdom, his knowledge, his advice and his philosophy are ever relevant. Despite being in a position of great weakness, he used his wits, his razor-sharp intelligence, his ability to articulate, to connect, to adapt, to listen and to engage (including diplomacy, networking and negotiation skills, maybe even oratory and eloquence), his humility, his charm, his energy and drive, his ability and willingness to stay the course, to shoulder responsibility and facilitate change (without making a show), his optimism, his ability to absorb 'toxin'(so as to clear the 'fog' of negativity, the 'mist' of untruths and make-believe, as well as past cobwebs, etc), his perception/savvy and decisiveness, his power of conviction, his charisma, his astuteness, his single-minded determination and courage, his unwavering focus and grit, his ability to guide, his remarkable steadfastness, his considerable wisdom and knowledge, his immense foresight, his vision, his ability to unify and reconcile, his understanding of people and events et al - to fructify his thoughts and plans. Else... the likes of Duryodhan, Duḥśāsana, Shakuni, Kansh, Jarasandh et al would have held sway. Krishna also set the stage for Kaliyug to manifest; Kali = bud, symbolizing a "new dawn".

[*Shri Vishnu wears the auspicious "Kaustubha Mani" (Kaustubha jewel) around his neck. Sri Sri Lakshmi Devi dwells in this jewel, on Vishnu's chest. The "Kaustubha Mani" represents consciousness, which manifests itself in all that shines: the sun, the moon, the fire and the speech. Thus this jewel represents consciousness, the consciousness of all living things. *This brilliant jewel also represents the Sun's Disc (allegorically, that is). Out of one thousand names of Lord Vishnu (Vishnu Sahasra Nama), Ravi, Surya, Savita, Jyotiraaditya, Bhaskaradyuti, Gavastinemi (Centre of Rays) are also the names of the Sun. In the Vedas, Lord Vishnu has been mentioned as "Sahasrasirsa" ("with thousand heads.") This signifies his radiance, his scintillating effulgence. [Also, the multi-avatar Lord Vishnu is a fountainhead of enlightenment and knowledge.] Countless rays of the Sun (Surya Rashmi) are named as 'Sahasrasirsa'; hence Surya is called "Sahasranshu". Therefore, Vikramaditya roughly translates to: the radiance of Vikram. (Aaditya = the Sun.) The Vikram-Betal stories featuring Vikramaditya were woven to disseminate certain values and thoughts. This land has had a rich history of storytelling, e.g. Panchatantra, Hitopadesha, Jataka Tales, Jain Tales and the like. Hitopadesha is a collection of Sanskrit fables in prose and verse. According to the author of Hitopadesha, Narayana, the main purpose of creating Hitopadesha is to instruct young minds the philosophy of life in an easy manner so that they are able to grow into responsible adults. It is almost similar to the Panchatantra ('Five Principles') of Vishnu Sharma. Hitopadesha (Sanskrit: Hitopadeśa) has been derived from two words, 'hita' (welfare/benefit)and 'upadesha' (advice/counsel). It basically means to counsel or advice (upadesha) with benevolence, and for the welfare and benefit of everyone. Imparting ethics, morals and knowledge, Hitopadesha is one amongst the most widely read Sanskrit book in India. The Panchatantra  (Sanskrit: Pañcatantra), on the other hand, is an inter-woven series of colourful fables, many of which involve animals exhibiting animal stereotypes and even human qualities.It illustrates, for the benefit of three ignorant princes... the central Sanaatan dharmic principles of nīti.While nīti is hard to translate, it roughly means prudent worldly conduct, or "the wise conduct of life". The Jataka tales, on the other hand, are dated between 300 BC and 400 AD and were written for mankind to gain knowledge and ethics. Originally written in Pali language, Jataka Buddhist tales have been translated in different languages around the world. The luminous fables of 'Jataka' are intended to impart values of self-sacrifice, morality, honesty and other informative values to people. No less than 547 in number, Jataka Tales are an important part of the canon of sacred Buddhist literature. These anecdotes and fables depicts earlier incarnations - sometimes as an animal, sometimes as a human - of the being who would become Siddhartha Gautama, the future Buddha. While the 'Jain Tales' aim to teach children values that help in avoiding (accumulating) bad karma. It encourages them to learn to accept and appreciate virtues. The tales about will power, devotion, penance and mutual respect, help underline the importance to serve and support rather than cause pain and suffering. *Could this brilliant jewel ("Kaustubha Mani" or Kaustubha jewel) also have been an indicator for solar energy? Or other energy, hydrogen fuel, for example... wherein hydrogen (an excellent + cost-effective source of energy) is stored on 'micro-jewels' (micro-beads or pellets?) as a hydride compound? Perhaps, our ancients knew how to cleave the hydrogen-oxygen bonds present in water... in order to produce hydrogen. ... And since Dvarka was an island surrounded by seawater...  a huge source of clean energy (since burning of hydrogen results in its re-conversion back to water)... we cannot rule this possibility out. Also, via waste water treatment (that generates electricity from the hydrogen produced.) ]

Thus, Sri Krishn is Vrishaakritih (Dharma/Vrisha Himself). He is Dharma personified. ['Dharma' is not moralism. It is ethics: values/ideals and principles + actions that benefit people and society. There is never a vacuum; instead there are a myriad of 'push' and 'pull', 'cross currents' and a multitude of challenges. And yet, in spite of these, Krishna was able to perform deeds that helped people, society and civilization.] Thus, Krishn is kshemakrit: Doer of good. Thus, he is mahaamanaah: Great-minded. Thus, he is Dharmadhyaksha (Lord of Dharma). Thus, he is Vrisha Uttamam (Supreme Dharma). Thus, he is mahaavaraaho (the great boar). Thus, he personifies 'nishkam karm' (selfless action). Thus, he is also the finest 'karm-yogi'. Thus, he is 'Yug Purush', the Renaissance Man. Thus, he is eternal inspiration. Thus, he is Ajaya: The Conqueror of Life And Death. Thus, he is 'Bhagavan' (the 'Fortunate One' or the 'Blessed One'.) Thus, he is taarah: He who saves. Thus, he is mahaashringah: Great-horned (Matsya). Thus, he is Ekashringa Varaha, Unicorn Boar: One without a parallel.Thus, he is suhrit: Friend of all creatures. Thus, he is Jagadisha: Protector of All. Thus, he is Vrishakapi (one-horned Varaha) - the Supreme form of Lord Narayan/Shri Hari Vishnu. ... And thus, he is 'Ajatashatru' ("one without enemies")  - in a manner of speaking, that is. || krishnas tu bhagavan svayam || ~ Perhaps 'coz: in him we find glimpses of all the Maha Avatars/great incarnations ~ the Dasavatara. And so, Sri Krishn is equivalent to the Dasavatara.

As Arjun stood in the battlefield of Kurukshetra (the greatest of 'Dharm-Yudh', battle of principles/ethics), he was overcome with feelings of weakness and confusion... since he faced the prospect of killing his own kith and kin. Realizing that his adversaries were his own relatives, beloved friends and revered teachers, he turns to his charioteer and guide, Krishna, for advice. Responding to his confusion and moral dilemma, Krishna advises him to follow his 'sva-dharma' or his 'duty as a ksatriya'/upholder of dharm (i.e. ethics/principles/justice or actions that benefit society.) ['Kshatriya' is an amalgamation of two words: ksat (meaning 'injury'), and tra (meaning 'deliver'). Therefore, ksatriya/kshatriya means: one who protects others. Or in other words, one who is an upholder of ethics/principles/justice. Shri Krishn is thus referred to as "Kshatriya-Shresht" (shresht = the finest, best of the best. After all, he is the protector and preserver.) 'Sva-dharma' literally means: 'work or duty born out of one's talent, nature or pravritti'. The 18th chapter of the Srimad Bhagavad Geeta examines the relationship between 'sva-dharma' and 'swabhava' (i.e. one's essential/intrinsic nature or inherent talent). In this chapter, the 'sva-dharma' of an individual is linked with the 'gunas' or the 'tendencies or talent arising out of one's swabhava' (one's nature, inclination). This 'Sva-dharma' - that Shri Krishna talked about - is now known as 'varna-dharma' or 'varnashram dharma'. (Varna = talent/aptitude; one's nature, inclination, bent of mind or pravritti. Shram = work, task. Dharma = ethics, way of life. In short, the varna-system enumerated (but in no particular order of superiority or inferiority, though) ~ the manpower/workforce into four distinct groups. Thus, the Varna-system ~ Varna-shram Dharma/Varna-dharma ~ essentially recognizes one's talent [aptitude and ability] ~ for various work/tasks... and therefore, the manpower/workforce was based on one's aptitude and ability. So, imagine the level of training and efficiency. However, since this was a non-rigid system, there was no concept of 'traditional occupation' whatsoever.)] [Note: "Varna-dharma" or "Varnashram dharma" has nothing to do with "caste". Varna does not mean "caste", it means: talent; aptitude and ability. Even jaat/jaati does not mean "caste. It indicates clan. ("Caste" is derived from the Portuguese word "Casta," meaning: purity of descent.) No "varna" (talent; aptitude, ability) is meant to be superior or inferior to the other... 'coz society cannot function in the absence of any one of them. The four "varna" is as per one's nature, inclination or pravritti, and is based on one's gunas (traits, talent). "Varna-dharma" or "Varnashram dharma" is neither rigid nor based on one's birth, etc. It depends on one's pravritti (nature, inclination, interest) and gunas (traits, aptitude, talent). It is fluid. And concepts like "backward", "scheduled this-or-that", "dalit" etc are not part of it... since civic amenities, town planning, et al were excellent in earlier times. (All this, including rigidity, based on one's birth, etc has come about in the last millennium or so... as a 'by-product' of societal "samudra-manthan", etc. However, various reform and renaissance movements were able to undo and/or dilute various unwanted aspects and social ills.) The four "varna" were: Brahman/Brahmana-varna, Ksatriya-varna, Vaishya-varna and Sudra-varna. Not in any order of superiority, etc though; just four "varna" (one's talent based on one's 'pravritti' or nature, inclination and interest, and 'gunas' or traits).  A "Brahman" or "Brahmana" was someone who dedicated his or her life to the pursuit (and dissemination) of knowledge, innovation, research, and other intellectual and intellect-related activities. (Note: It's "Brahman" or "Brahmana", not "Brahmin". "Brahman" or "Brahmana" = one who proceeded along the path of knowledge [Brahm], enlightenment [Brahmn]. And one's birth did not determine this.) A "ksatriya" was someone who protected others; thus a "ksatriya" was essentially an upholder of ethics/principles/justice. Their actions benefited society (and people) in general. As for "Vaishya", whosoever was engaged in any kind of trading or business-related activities was "Vaishya". While the rest, be they peasants, craftsmen, artisans, weavers, textile and handloom manufactures, fisherfolk, horticulturists, those involved in animal husbandry, et al were "Sudra". [Therefore, ancient India was a hub of labour-intensive activities that not only generated employment and revenue, but also allowed creativity to flourish.] The "Varna-dharma"/"Varnashram-Dharma" or the Varna System was fluid... and not rigid. There was no concept of 'traditional occupation'. As for "tribal", they were known as "adi-vasi" or "vanvasi" (forest-dwellers or forest-dwelling human. Van = forest. Adi = ancient, original or earliest known. So, perhaps, they may have been the first set of humans that evolved on earth... from various animal-like ancestors.)] *The Hayagreeva/Hayagriva is also an avatar of Lord Narayan/Shri Hari Vishnu. (It refers to someone 'horse-faced'/with an equine face, or more likely, 'horse-jawed'. Greeva/Griva = jaw. Maybe this avatar is our ancients' visualization/version/understanding of a Super-smart "knight". And, perhaps, the unicorn too should be viewed in this context.) The Hayagriva-avatar is believed to have 'rescued the Vedas... which was taken to rasatala'. It probably means: that this avatar rescued the Vedas (and/or Sanaatan Dharma) from decay and degradation. In other words: this avatar revitalized the Vedas (its contents, Vedic knowledge, etc) by cleansing it of the many unwanted aspects... that would have seeped into them. (Veda comes from the Sanskrit root 'Vid' which means, "to know". 'Vid' has in turn given rise to 'Vidya' ~ knowledge. Vedic = 'from the Veda'; Sanaatan Dharm was essentially an enlightened 'way of life'.) Therefore, 'Sanaatan Vedic Dharma'is the treasure-trove of timeless knowledge - which our ancients gathered (learnt) from nature (Prakriti), universe (Brhmaand/Brahmaand) and space (Vyoma)... and then accumulated them within the four Vedas and its other tributaries like the Upanishads, the Purans and so on. Hence, this timeless knowledge is essentially a 'way of life': it was all about living in harmony with nature, performing one's karm yog, pursuit of knowledge, becoming higher spiritual beings, connecting with the Higher Self or seeking communion with the Universal Consciousness (Sat-cit-ānanda: eternal bliss of self-realization), and so on. (Thus the Vedas can essentially be referred to/understood as: 'Book of Knowledge' or 'Book of Enlightenment'.) And so, this ancient Vedic faith, Sanaatan Dharm, was never a cultic movement (to unite people under a single "founder")... simply because there has never been a "founder"! Instead, it is a 'way of life' rooted in antiquity, and the stress is on 'dharma', meaning: to perform actions/deeds that benefit society and humanity. The term Upanishadis derived from upa (near), ni (down) and sad (to sit), i.e., sitting down near a spiritual teacher (guru) in order to receive instruction in the Guru-shishyaparampara (tradition). Upanishad also means 'setting at rest ignorance by revealing the knowledge of the Supreme Spirit (Brahmn/Param-aatma).' A gloss of the term Upanishad based on Shankara's commentary on the Katha and Brihadāranyaka Upanishadsequates it with Ātmavidyā ("knowledge of the Self"), or Brahmavidyā("knowledge of Brahmn"). Shankara derived the word from the root "sad" (to destroy, to loosen, to reach) with Upa and nias prefixes and kvip as termination and equated it's meaning with the 'destruction of ignorance'. Therefore, Upanishad means "Brahma/Brahmn-knowledgeby which ignorance is loosened or destroyed." The treatises that deal with Brahma-knowledgeare called the Upanishads and so, pass for the Vedanta. The different derivations together make out that the Upanishads give us both spiritual vision and philosophical argument. In the Upanishads the spiritual meanings of the Vedic texts are brought out and emphasized in their own right. The authorship of the Upanishads is unknown, but some of their chief doctrines are associated with the names of particular sages such as: Aruni, Yajnavalkya, Bâlâki, Svetaketu, and Sândilya. The Upanishads belong to the class of sruti, or 'revealed literature', uttered by the learned sages (of yore) in the fullness of an illumined understanding of the 'truth' (Brahmn/Ultimate Truth). According to tradition, there were over two hundred Upanishads, but the philosopher and commentator Shankara (who lived sometime between 509 and 820 C.E.) only composed commentaries to eleven of them, generally regarded as the oldest ones. The Muktika Upanishad lists 108 Upanishads, while according to Panini's Ashtadhyayi(also known as: Panineeyam); the total number of Upanishads was 900. Patanjali too puts the number at 900. Therefore, it appears that most of them are lostforever. Alas. [Let's turn to Manu and Manusmriti (which, very likely, gave rise to the word 'manuscript'.) There are innumerable universes, with one Brahmā in each of them. There are fourteen Manu who are prominent within this universe, each overseeing a "manvantara" or "manuvantara". "Manu" is a title for the one who rules a manvantara. Each "Manu" is endowed with great knowledge and wisdom. (The word "Manav", signifying human or humanity, comes from "Manu". Manav = human, mankind; antara = period, cycle.) Each kalpa (1,000 maha-yugas) is reigned over/overseen by a succession of 14 Manus, and the reign of each Manu is called a "manvantara". A single manvantara is approximately 71 maha-yugas. Manusmriti or rules of Manu texts are ascribed to Yajña (as Svāyambhuva Manu) - the first Manu. Each Manu is the progenitor of a line/lineage. Therefore, each Manu is the progenitor of a group of humans, who eventually intermix. Hence, it is probably said that... Manu is the 'progenitor of mankind' ~ Manav-jaati ('lineage of Manu') or manuṣya-jaati ('born of Manu'). Or it could also mean "guided by Manu". And thus, all humans are, therefore, called "Manava". However, "Manu" is not "Brahmin". "Manu" is essentially a flood figure... who arrive (as per the instructions of the Almighty/Lord Narayan) in order to rescue, guide and resettle mankind during times of great calamity, distress and turbulence (Mahajal Pralay, the Great Flood.) Therefore, "Manusmriti" (translated into English as: "laws of Manu," though "smriti" is not quite "law")... should be seen in that context. It is at best temporary/interim "guidelines" (to give people a semblance of order + to reassure them) ~ since all groups of humans would be traumatized and disoriented... and displaced. Besides, they have to travel in specially built nao (ship) for years together (to be able to ride out the swirling waters and its effects... to reach land and safety.) *They have to start life anew in strange environs (maybe after a couple of generations or more spent in specially built ships/nao.) And perhaps, some of them have to live (for generations) in specially-equipped caves or even in settlements/shelters below the ground. Hence, Sanaatan Dharm is not based on "Manusmriti". 'Coz this ancient Vedic 'way of life' - Sanaatan Dharm - is neither monolithic nor homogeneous. And, though various unwanted aspects did seep into Sanaatan Dharma in the last millennium or so... various reform and renaissance movements led by progressive and far-sighted men and women (but mostly men) were able to cleanse/undo and/or dilute many of these. And, given that our ancient texts have experienced all kinds of mistranslations, inflections, interpolations, et al (in the last millennium)... whether "Manusmriti" has remained impervious or not ~ my guess is as good as yours. These reform and renaissance movements happened at a time when the modes of communication, transportation, and publishing, et al were nowhere near what they are today... and, all sorts of regressive aspects had submerged Sanaatan Dharm. So much so that this enlightened and progressive 'way of life' ~ Sanaatan Dharm, or even what we today understand as "Hinduism" - had ceased to exist, in a manner of speaking, that is. In its place was a usurper, a ritual-heavy regression-filled burden known as "Brahminical faith". (Therefore, in essence, what we today refer to as "Sikh-ism", "Jain-ism" or even "Buddh-ism" came about as non-Brahminical faiths. Perhaps, Bhagavan Buddh did not (intend to) start a new "religion"... 'coz such a concept was unknown in his time. However, "Buddh-ism" eventually came about... courtesy the hegemony of the "Brahminical faith".These non-Brahminical faiths (and others groups centered around a social reformer) provided an opportunity to wide swathes of the population to find their way out of the black hole of hopelessness that the "Brahminical faith" had relegated them. Not only did the new faiths not treat them shabbily, but also allowed them to pray and worship, apart from offering them opportunities to gain literacy, medical treatment and so on. In short: a respectable life. And the new faiths did all that... without being patronizing, without rubbing salt into wounds. Instead, they "healed".) Therefore, to all those - be they leaders or ordinary people - who were able to extricate and resurrect Sanaatan Dharm from the slough it had fallen into... let our salutations go. [The Bhakti and Sufi movements converged, and their combined message of egalitarianism and justice was able to support and bring about positive societal change. The greats of both these movements shared an easy camaraderie; they advocated 'love of God' as the easiest way to attain God; besides, both also preached the unity of God, love for mankind, tolerance and importance of good deeds. Thus, they were able to create an atmosphere of mutual trust and peaceful coexistence... that in turn benefited the people and society.] Umm, but there wasn't quite a pan-India movement as such... due to constraints of commutation and communication. However, today the English language binds the whole of South-Asia and beyond. (Thus, this language, in a generic sense, was the 'amrit' that arose out of yet another 'manthan' that happened in this part of the world.) In every 'manthan' there will be some or the other 'by-product'. However, one must not confuse the trees for the forest, so to speak. 'Coz the 'amrit' cannot and should not be belittled or ignored; it is more important than anything else. This is the philosophy of a Param-hamsah (Supreme Swan). ~ It is a quality that a true Hamsan (ascetic/yogi) possesses. Lord Krishn is "Supreme Swan" ~ a true "Hamsan" or "yogi". The hamsah (swan) is supposed to possess the ability to separate the water from the cream (in milk). The hamsa's ability to separate milk and water symbolizes the need to differentiate between good/positive aspects and bad/negative aspects as well as the eternal and the evanescent.  

[*Note: Sri Hayagrīva (the embodiment of higher knowledge, cosmic wisdom) is an incarnation of Lord Narayan/Vishnu, depicted with a human body and a horse's head, brilliant white in color (like a swan/hamsah), with white garments, seated on a white lotus. [Puṇḍarīka/Pundarika or Pankaja/Svetakamala/Shubhra Kamal is "white/pure white lotus". Pure white signifies pristine, embodiment of pure knowledge, as well as tranquility.] He is the Cosmic Lord of all wisdom (cosmic wisdom). He has four lotus hands, with one in the mode of bestowing knowledge; another holds books of knowledge/wisdom (the Vedas), and the other two hold the Conch (Shankh) and the Disc (Chakra - possibly indicating the galaxies) respectively. [Shankhdhvani is similar to the sacred OM sound - the primeval sound ~ pranavah/Omkara/pranava naad, the sound of the universe itself. It is the sound of the origination and dissolution of the universe.] His beauty, like fresh cut crystal (Nirmala sphatik krittim Adharam), is an auspicious brilliance that never decays. Hayagreeva is depicted seated, most often with his right hand either blessing the supplicant or in the vyaakhyaa mudraa - pose of teaching. The right hand also usually holds an aksha-maalaa (rosary, Rudraksha?), indicating his identification with meditative knowledge. His left hand holds a book, indicating his role as a teacher. His face is always serene and peaceful, if not smiling. [He is also hailed as "Hayasirsa". (Haya = Horse, Sirsa = Head.)] This avatar is worshiped on the full moon day in August (Sravana-Paurnami/Sravana-Poornima ~ his avatara-dina) and on Mahanavami, the ninth day of the Navaratri festival. His consort is Devi Lakshmi (Marici - ray of light), the goddess of the rising sun, more accurately the sun's light... the life force of all things. Hayagriva is sometimes worshiped in a solitary pose of meditation: this form is known as Yoga-Hayagriva. However, he is most commonly worshipped along with his consort Devi Lakshmi and is known as Lakshmi-Hayagriva.] The horse-faced/equine-faced form of Lord Vishnu is the God of Vidya or knowledge as well as prosperity. One who prays to Lord Hayagriva shall be blessed with knowledge and wisdom. Sri Hayagriva is the male equivalent to Devi Sarasvati. Apparently, Lord Vishnu compiled the Vedas (Book of Knowledge/Wisdom or Book of Enlightenment ~ eternal wisdom, knowledge, wisdom, guidance and philosophy) in the Hayagriva form and that this avatar precedes the Matsya Avatar. From Lord Narayan/Vishnu the eternal knowledge was transferred to Lord Brahma (the Chief Engineer/Scientist of the Cosmos) and Devi Sarasvati, then to Lord Surya/Suryadev, to the Manu-s ~ who, in turn, disseminated it to various humans (including Ikshvaku - son of Vaivasvata Manu - and the founder of the Ikshvaku [or Aikṣvāka]dynasty ~ to which greats like Sagara, Dilīpa, Bhagiratha, Raghu and Shri Ram belonged). The Hayagriva Avatar is also the rescuer of the Vedas (from 'rasatala' - utter degradation and decay. 'Rasatala' is also the name of one of the lower planets of the Spiritually deprived but Materially advanced Adho-Lokas/Lower Realms (not to be mistaken for the Hellish Planets/Narak-Loka.) One of the legends states that during creation, (malevolent entities) Madhu and Kaitabha stole the Vedas (Book of Knowledge/Wisdom or Book of Enlightenment ~ treasure-trove of eternal wisdom, knowledge, guidance and philosophy) from Lord Brahma (the Chief Engineer/Scientist of the Cosmos). To save the Vedas/eternal knowledge (from falling into wrong hands... and therefore, its misuse) - Lord Vishnu took the form of Hayagreeva. ~ This story represents the triumph of pure knowledge, guided by the divine over negative/malevolent forces of darkness (ignorance, delusion, etc.) It could even be an allegorical tale applicable for all ages. [~ The two bodies of Madhu and Kaitabha disintegrated into twelve pieces (two heads, two torsos, four arms and four legs): These are considered to represent the twelve seismic plates of the Earth.] (Sri Hayagrīva is known for his Shaurya - conspicuous and uncommon gallantry and intrepidity; he is known to never rest; possesses the all-mighty light; is without the slightest care for his own welfare, his heart is full of compassion (unbiased, dispassionate understanding), and so on.] Maybe, if He were to be otherwise, the Vedas (Book of Wisdom/Knowledge or Book of Enlightenment ~ treasure-trove of eternal wisdom, knowledge, guidance and philosophy would have remained in the Adho-Lokas/Lower Realms and/or in perpetual decay.) Hayagreeva is an embodiment of intelligence and knowledge. He is a divine being who gives divine intelligence and wisdom. He is also the "Defender of faith" (from negative aspects, like ignorance, etc.) Hayagreeva can also bestow "Siddhi" (self-realization, Jeevan Mukti) when one connects with his divine energy. [Here is the Hayagreeva Gayatri (a Vedic hymn): || Om Vagisvaraya vidhmahe Hayagrivaya dheemahi Tanno Hamsat pracodayat || ~ (Hamsat: a being with the complexion of a swan/hamsah). ~ Om, Let me meditate on the god of learning, O God who has an equine-face, give me higher intellect, And let Lord Hayagreeva - Him of the hamsah/swan-like complexion - illuminate my mind. The second one is the Hayagreeva slokam (from a stotram): || Jnana-ananada mayam devam Nirmala sphatik krittim Adharam Sarva Vidyanam Hayagriva Upasmahae ||: Link. Note: The hamsah (swan) is supposed to possess the ability to separate water from cream (in milk). The hamsa's ability to separate milk and water symbolizes the need to differentiate between good/positive aspects and bad/negative aspects as well as the eternal and the evanescent. Sri Hayagrīva is thus Param-hamsah (Supreme Swan.) ~ The hamsah/swan... whose feathers do not get damp despite remaining in contact with water is an embodiment of "detachment" and exemplifies a true "yogi", a real ascetic/hamsan or sanyaasi/Jeevan Mukt (one who is detached like the lotus... which grows in muddy water and yet remains Nirmal - untouched by it. It is the mark of an enlightened, higher soul (mahatmanah). The spirit of such persons is spotless, like the lotus in muddy water that remains "detached" [does not adhere to it.] ~ This should also help us to understand the concept of 'lotus feet' as well as the concept of Kara-puṣkara or 'lotus-palm'.] Note: No one can describe the Supreme Lord though. Noone has ever seen Him. Words aren't enough to do justice to His glories. He is infinite. He is beyond the physical world and beyond Past, Present and Future. ~ The (great incarnations)/maha-avatars are also known as 'leela-avatars'; they appear in their human form but their purpose is different. ~ Any one who attributes human values to God (the 'leela-avatars' included) - has failed to realize the True Leelas behind these episodes. One can truly understand the maha-avatars and the magnitude of their karm - only in one's mind's eye. ['Coz our ancient texts are full of allegories, metaphors and symbolism. By taking them literally (i.e. at face value) ] one will not be able to grasp their true essence. ~ E.g. 'Giridhari' is not literal - it is allegorical; Krishn did not lift a whole mountain - literally, that is (he was whisked away to a safer place as a newborn... and then sent away to study at the age of 5 or 7 [do read paragraphs #4 and #6 - to get the drift]; therefore, a teenage Krishn holding a large hill/mountain on his forefinger is allegorical.) However, when one fully understands the significance of Krishn's karm... one can comprehend ('see' in one's mind's eye) *why* he is 'Giridhari' - the achiever of Herculean/superhuman tasks/deeds - against great odds/impediments/adversities. ~ And then, one can also understand: why he is the most chivalrous fish in the samsaric ocean - guiding others through turbulent waters. [He is also the dispeller ("lifter") of (the allegorical 'dark clouds' of) pessimism, confusion, despondency, hopelessness, et al; he is the harbinger of hope and the bringer of sunshine.]

[The 10th Vishnu, the Kalki-mahaavatar ~ too has an equine face... indicating a Super-smart chivalrous "knight". This avatar is a (fair-complexioned ~ the allegorical/metaphoric "pure white lotus"/ Puṇḍarīka/Pundarika; pure white signifies pristine, pure knowledge) person and not a 'white horse', per se. It is also indicative of his kuṇḍalinī (do read paragraph #9 - to know more about Kundalini), which is vital for all the 7 Chakras - centers of Prāṇa, life force, or vital energy - to be fully activated. Chakras correspond to vital points in the physical body i.e. major plexuses of arteries, veins and nerves. (For 'Sudarshan Chakra' ~ do refer to paragraph # 18 ~ from the top.) However, given that this avatar is depicted either as a 'white-coloured horse' or as 'a man with a horse's head' ~ people (at least those in the last millennium or so) probably were unclear... and so, did not quite know what to make of it (meaning, how to interpret the symbolism, etc). Besides, there is a "Hayagriva-avatar" too (and this avatar is depicted as 'a man with a horse's head' as well.) Thus, they probably decided to concentrate on the avatars that were depicted as human figures. But then the 8th and 10th Vishnu is very closely associated: Lord Kalki... one equal in stature to Lord Krishna will guide humanity (at the end of Kaliyug, when the metaphoric bud/flower [Kali] withers away and the 'Iron Age' [negative aspects] of Kaliyug is at its peak.) Thus: One who was known as Lord Krishna then... will be known as Lord Kalki now. In the circumstances when society and humanity finds itself totally handicapped and without a solution... at such a time it is only the Almighty who can help humanity come out of the confusion/chaos... and revitalize itself. Thus the Super-smart chivalrous "knight" (the equine faced Kalki-avatar) is none other than Lord Krishn ~ the finest avatar, the one closest to Lord Narayan... who will arrive to 'awaken' (from 'sleep' - stagnation and degeneration/decay) as well as to hold a mirror to society; to facilitate change, to set the stage for the next 'Maha-Yug' to manifest, to 'turn the wheel'; to rescue, guide and salvage (... and to prevent utter chaos on Prthvi-loka) ~ at a time when dharma, karma, comprehension, perception/cognition, noble values, ethics and principles, et al fall below the minimum level (i.e. when the 'Iron Age' [negative aspects] of Kaliyug is at its peak.)  

Kalki or Kalkiḥ (कल्किः) is also referred to as: KalkinandKalaki ~ often a metaphor for "Eternity" or "Time". (Time is Kala/Kaalah in Sanskrit. Purush/Purusha = Cosmic Energy. Lord Narayan is the "Kaal Purush". He is beyond time: puraatanah i.e. He who was even before time. Therefore, "Time" (Kaal or Kaalah) bows before Him. The Almighty - the Viraat Purush, the Cosmic Being, or the Primordial Being (Adi Purusha)... is the motive power behind the mathematically precise universes. 'Avatar' means: descent and refers to a descent of the divine into earthly form. Avatar comes from the Sanskrit avatirna: "manifest/descent from the Lord.") Those who achieve 'moksha' (liberation) are free from the constant cycle of life, death and re-birth... and thus, gain entry into Vaikunth (Vishnu-loka, the ananda-maya, cin-maya/eternal loka [planets]). For everyone else, the closest one can get to see (i.e. get a "darshan" of) the Almighty (Lord Narayan/Shri Hari/Vishnu/Satya-Sundar/Virupaksha) is through Lord Krishn (the 8th and 10th Vishnu). Lord Krishn is, therefore, God Himself (albeit, in the flesh). Both arrive to 'turn the wheel', to 'close' the respective yugs (Dvapar and Kali)... and to set the stage for the next yug/cycle to manifest ~ to usher in a "new dawn". (Lord Kalki also 'closes' the maha-yug, the four-yug cycle: Sat/Satya/Krita, Treta, Dvapar and Kali... and is a one-man army, a lone warrior in this 'manthan'. He will, therefore, absorb the maximum 'toxin/venom' ~ the 'by-product' of this 'manthan'. *And, given that it is the end of Kaliyug, the most difficult of times, with the 'Iron Age' [negative aspects] of Kaliyug at its peak... there is likely to be epic levels of 'venom'.) Please note: 'One-man army' or 'lone warrior' should not be construed as 'one-man show'; it is simply a sign of the times: unlike Dvapar, this time there will be no one of the caliber of Arjun, Bheem or even Chandragupta Maurya to work with him. Such is the situation at the end of Kaliyug: apathy sets in and so, all sorts of negativities proliferate; people's faculties become dormant ~ their perception/cognizance exists only in name. Thus, he alone will 'pull chestnuts out of the fire'; everyone else will be too busy working at cross-purposes and/or in pursuit of narrow/parochial interests.] || Shri Krishna Govind Hare Murare, Heye Nath Narayan, Vasudeva, Tribhuvan Ke Swami, Sakha Hamare, Heye Nath Narayan Vasudeva || [*Tamas is the quality of dullness, darkness, and inertia and is heavy, enveloping (like a fog or mist) or obstructing in its action. It functions as the force of gravity that retards things and holds them in specific limited forms. It possesses a downward motion that causes decay and disintegration. Tamas brings about ignorance and delusion in the mind and promotes insensitivity, 'sleep' and loss of awareness. It is the principle of materiality or unconsciousness that causes consciousness to become enveloped by a 'fog'. From Tamas comes the ignorance that obstructs or engulfs one's true nature and weakens one's power of perception. Through it arises the idea of an ego (ahankara) or 'separate self' by which one feels alone and isolated. Tamas prevails in consciousness identified with the physical body, which is dull and limited. As long as one's identity and sense of well-being is primarily physical one remains in the dark realm of Tamas. Tamasic types have deep-seated psychological blockages. Their energy and emotion tends to be stagnant and repressed and they do not know what their problems really are. They accept their condition as fate and do not take advantage of the methods that may alleviate their problems. They allow other people and negative influences to dominate them and do not like to be responsible for their lives. They prefer not to deal with their problems or will not let others know about them, which only allows the problems to get worse. The end of Kaliyug is marked by Tamasic-ness (~ the 'Iron Age' of Kaliyug is at its peak.)]

Kalkiḥ, Vishnu- Kalkiḥ or Krishn-Kalkiḥ ~ the tenth and final Maha Avatar (great incarnation) of Lord Vishnu, will bring to an end the dark and destructive influence of Kaliyug (the 'Iron Age' of Kaliyug) and set the stage for Krita/Satya Yug of the next cycle to manifest. Various ancient texts describe Kalkiḥ appearing as a 'blazing thunder or light'. [The Kalki-mahaavatar/Vishnu- Kalkiḥ will be the guide, teacher/guru, reformer, leader, deviser/maker/creator, pioneer/trailblazer/path-finder, toxin-venom absorber (since this avatar too is a 'blue avatar', very likely: Prussian Blue) anddoer; however, the 'wheel needs to keep turning'.] The origins of the name (Kalkiḥ) probably lie in the word Kalka, which refers to "dirt", "filth" or "foulness". Hence Kalkiḥ (कल्किः)means: Destroyer/Dispeller of foulness, confusion, darkness or Annihilator of ignorance. [Here, "foulness,""darkness,""dirt," and "filth" = dullness, ignorance, inertia, decay, disintegration, delusion, insensitivity (loss of humanism), 'sleep' (stagnation, decline/decay), loss of awareness, weakness of perception, pessimism, despondency, and everything arising out of these...  that causes consciousness to become enveloped by a 'fog'.] He is a torchbearer. Kalkiḥ also means: "the unifier". The (metaphoric, allegorical) flaming comet-like sword, (or a comet like a sword) - that the Kalki-mahaavatar wields... is a symbol for "discernment", or Wisdom ~ that slices away the bonds of illusion/delusion/lies/make-believe and foulness/filth ~ thereby lifting the 'fog of confusion' (from our eyes and thoughts)... thus showing the way forward, and thus also liberating the souls (jiva-atma) to greater awareness of 'truth' (Sat/Satya: i.e. dharma/actions that lead to a better society) and 'beauty' (goodness/Sundar: opposite of "filth"). Lord Vishnu will return as the final Avatar (the Kalki-mahaavatar) ~ amid fire and flames (utter confusion, degeneration, hopelessness and decay) ~ to reinvigorate the principles of "dharma" and "karm", besides setting the "Wheel of Dharma in Motion": to "awaken" the minds of those who live at the end of Kali Yug... so that they shake off their dullness, pessimism and despondency... and collectively work towards building a better society and civilization. ... This avatar will reconcile all opposites (opposing sides) ~ so as to prevent chaos (Pralaya or large-scale destruction) on Prthvi-loka. || Asato mā sad gamaya | From ignorance/untruth, lead me unto truth (dharma, ethics, actions that benefit society) | Tamaso mā jyotir gamaya ~ From darkness (the 'fog' of regressive aspects, ignorance, 'sleep' [stagnation, decline/decay], destruction, delusion and pessimism), lead me unto light (knowledge, hope, wisdom, enlightenment) ~ that help build/create a better society and civilization.] Kalkiḥ-Vishnu is a 'warrior', a warrior-par-excellence ~ against "dirt" and "filth"(of the 'Iron Age' of Kaliyug). He has three souls (symbolic): satyam-sivam-sundaram. One soul is the preserver/Vishnu (to preserve the world... from chaos/Pralaya/large-scale destruction); the second soul is the destroyer/Shiva (to 'destroy'"filth" and confusion, to 'annihilate' ignorance of the 'Iron Age' of Kali Yug), while the third soul is the creator/Brahma (to 'create' a new era/yug, i.e. to set the stage for Sat/Satya/Krita Yug of the next cycle to manifest). The symbolic form of Kalkiḥis on a white (winged) horse (Devadatta) ~ wielding a brilliant (comet-like) sword.However, another etymology from Sanskrit is 'white horse'. Meaning: Kalkiḥ is the 'white horse'; possibly: a fair-complexioned equine-faced Super-smart chivalrous "knight" ~ who will come to rescue, guide, prevent chaos and 'awaken'... as well as hold a mirror to society. (Fair-complexioned: given the 'white' horse allegory ~ signifying Puṇḍarīka/Pundarika or Shubhra Kamal ~ the allegorical/metaphoric "white lotus". White signifies pristine, pure knowledge.) Lord Vishnu is also called "Nandakee": One who holds the Nandaka sword. Srimad Bhagavad Gita 4:42: || tasmād ajñāna-sambhūtaḿ hṛt-sthaḿ jñānāsinātmanaḥ chittvainaḿ saḿśayaḿ yogam ātiṣṭhottiṣṭha bhārata || ~ Therefore, sever the ignorant doubt in your heart with the sword of self-knowledge. Observe your discipline (karm yog). Arise (shun ennui, tardiness or slothfulness, despondency, pessimism, and so on.) | Shri Gautam Buddh: "Being deeply learned and skilled, being well-trained and using well-spoken words: this is good luck." | Swami Vivekananda: "All power is within you, you can do anything and everything. Believe in that." [Do read the fourth paragraph from the last - to know more about self-knowledge and "samadhi".] 

The first age, Sat/Satya/KritaYug, is believed to be the best age/yug when "Dharma"(ethics, values, principles, et al... and by extension karm, spiritual conditions, cognition, as well as society and civilization), represented by the symbolic holy bull (not to be mistaken for a bovine creature per se), stood on its all four legs; then came (the second era) TretaYug - in which the ethical and spiritual conditions deteriorated a bit, therefore "Dharma" lost one of its legs. By the time the third age, i.e. DvaparaYug, arrived... "Dharma" had lost two of its legs. And in the most degenerate/decayed of all ages - the end of KaliYug (when the 'Iron Age' of Kaliyug is at its peak) - "Dharma" is said to be standing only on one leg. Across the yugs/ages when imbalances are created by adverse conditions (can be referred to as "dushkrtam"/malevolence ~ and can include: ignorance, ennui, perfunctoriness, confusion, delusion, lack of perspective and comprehension, 'sleep' [stagnation, degeneration, decay] and so on) ~ they are believed to be set right (through a combination of karm/action [including selfless action] + guidance) by various incarnations of Lord Vishnu/Narayan - in a variety of human forms called "Avatars" (asper His stated ~ dharma-samsthapanarthaya sambhavami yuge-yuge: ~ To guide and to re-establish/revitalize/rejuvenate the principles of "dharma" and "karm" ~ for the benefit of mankind/humanity ~ for a better society and civilization, I manifest Myself millennium after millennium.) ~ Srimad Bhagavad Gita (Chapter IV-7): || yada yada hi dharmasya glanir bhavati bharata abhyutthanam adharmasya tadatmanam srjamy aham || ~ Whenever and wherever there is an alarming decline or discrepancy in dharma/dharmic principles (for the greater good of mankind/humanity, and for society/civilization to flourish well); or when such an alarming decline is perceived or becomes a bane; O descendant of Bharata, only then, I, manifest Myself. ['Avatar' means: descent, and refers to a descent of the divine into earthly form. Avatar comes from the Sanskrit avatirna: "manifest/descent from the Lord."] A cycle of four yugs (Sat/Satya/Krita, Treta, Dvapar and Kaliyug ~ whose lengths follow a ratio of 4:3:2:1) is known as a "Maha Yug" or a "Chatur-Yug". Thus, Kaliyug is the shortest era/age/yug. It was the Krishn-avatar who arrived to help and guide humanity in the transition from Dvapar to Kaliyug. [Kali does not mean demon. Kali means bud. Only at the end of Kaliyug - when the metaphoric bud/flower withers away - the 'Iron Age' (negative aspects) of Kaliyug will be at its peak.]

~ These incarnations/avatars come in their human form... choosing their manner of entry into the world according to the demand of the times. It is said that at the end of Kaliyug "Dharma" will cease to exist (i.e. ethics, values, principles, karm, spiritual conditions, cognitive abilities, perspective, et al shall be touching their lowest point) ~ paving the way for darkness of the mind (the dense 'fog' of ignorance, apathy, loss of hope, despondency, confusion, illusion, delusion, lower modes of materialism, pursuit of narrow interests/parochialism, and so on) to hold sway. So much so that Arya Dharma (the noble tenets of the Arya 'way of life') too will cease to exist (touch its lowest point). Besides, there will be other challenges as well: e.g. unlike the end of Dvapar, there will be many paths/faiths. Plus, the end of Kaliyug signifies/heralds the end of an entire "maha-yug" (a four-yug cycle) and the commencement/transition into a whole new one. In other words, from the 'Iron Age' of Kaliyug to the 'Golden Age' of Sat/Satya/Krita Yug ~ i.e. from the lowest point ("Dharma" on one leg) to the best of eras/ages/yugs ("Dharma" on all four legs). Therefore, it will not merely be an intra-yug transition - from one yug to another within a Chatur-yug (a four-yug cycle: Sat/Satya/Krita, Treta, Dvapar and Kaliyug.) ~ It is said that the Kalki-avatar is essentially the return of the Krishn-avatar in another form ~ to preserve and to protect, as well as to help and guide humanity in this transition. This movement (from the 'Iron Age' of Kaliyug to the 'Golden Age' of Sat/Satya/Krita Yug) will have to be gradual ~ slow and steady.  [Do also read the next paragraph - for better clarity.] In a manner of speaking... it has to (gradually) move into and pass through a symbolic Dvapar (the 'Copper Age': "Dharma" on two legs; when some aspects of "Arya-Dharma", karm, cognition, comprehension, introspection et al still existed), followed by a symbolic Treta (the 'Age of Silver': "Dharma" on three legs) ~ finally leading to Sat/Satya/Krita (the 'Golden Age', the best era/age/yug of all ~ "Dharma" on all four legs.) ~ It is not a reverse movement - per se, but a symbolic one; one that will include/accompany a corresponding change in values/ethics, perspective, perception/cognitive abilities, introspection, karm, as well as dharma (actions that benefit society or lead to a better society and civilization), and so on. ~ There is no magic wand, no quick-fix, no instant solution; earthlings/humanity will have to settle/manage/handle their own issues - through collective effort, there is no one "out there" (a messiah figure) who will come and do it. They will guide and show the way - yes, however, there is no alternative to karm yog. ~ This has been the message of the Krishn-avatar. And this has also been the message of the Buddh-avatar. ~ Thus, it will require a cogent, sagacious, persuasive, far-sighted and diligent avatar (characterized by steady, earnest and energetic effort) ~ someone with dhriti/dhrti (courage of the mind - resilient, constant/steadfast, patient and displaying fortitude and endurance) - a Sampoorna (complete, all-embracing) Avatar - to not only address (interact with) all of humanity, but to also accomplish certain tasks (to preserve and to protect, to reform and to guide) ~ to show the way forward. The Kalki-avatar is (thus) an epoch-making avatar, a Yug Purush (Renaissance Man)... and is predicted to be an erudite, intelligent and valiant personage who will possess Sattva Guna-s (noble traits/qualities). [Valour/Shaurya is a special human quality, usually demonstrated in the performance of extraordinary and unselfish deeds (nishkam karm) in the face of great challenges... for the greater good.] ~ When avatars arrive, they trigger or accelerate karmas. ~ The avatars create situations - time, place and opportunity - that bring forth both the good/positive as well as the bad/negative; e.g. Krishn brought out both the positive and the negative. [Possibly: to let out the 'toxin' or 'venom' (to generate potent Prana or vital force in order to reform) - to clear the 'cobwebs', to lift the 'fog', to pull humanity/society out of decay/'quicksand'/quagmire or prevent its slide into it, to "awaken" humanity ... as well as to hold a mirror to society, to urge humanity into introspection ~ so that it leads to a natural process of unraveling (from ignorance to discovery and from reformation to transformation). ... This process would be crucial for the transition into the 'Golden Age' of Sat/Satya/Krita Yug (the best of all ages/eras/yugs... from the 'Iron Age' of Kaliyug (the lowest point of all ages/eras/yugs)] ~ The 'destroying/dispelling powers' of Kalkiḥ ... is sharpest of all ~ so as to let out the 'toxin'/'venom' (to generate potent Prana or vital force in order to reform); to clear 'cobwebs' and 'fog'; to hold a mirror to society, as well as to 'destroy' (dispel) ego/ahamkara, negative pride/conceit, delusion, ignorance, and so on. [... This may be so, since this maha-avatar will remain among humans for the shortest time, and will accomplish all that needs to be done (to protect and to preserve, as well as to guide) in twenty years.] The Kalki-avatar shall possess the five doors of perception - sight, hearing, smell, taste and touch, besides... mind, heart, intelligence and "Turyavastha" or transcendence of intuitive experience. [For purposes of comprehension, "Turyavastha" can be translated as the "super-conscious" state (as opposed to waking [Jagrata] to be conscious, dream [Swapna] to be sub-conscious, and deep sleep [Sushupti] to be unconscious states). Turyaga is the state of a Muni/Jnani/"yogi", it leads to "detachment", Jeevan Mukt ~ allowing one to enter into nirvikalpa samadhi to 'awaken' to "Moksha" (liberation). Such a person can do seemingly impossible tasks with ease - the allegorical 'Giridhari'. Such a person is also "Siddha" - one whose heart is larger than the universe itself; one who has achieved the eternal bliss/spiritual ecstasy of "self-realization" ~ Sat-cit-ānanda.] This maha-avatar will also possess seven other characteristics of a 'Purna-avatar', an integral or all-inclusive avatar, e.g.: Grace or reward for effort that fails to be rewarded though it has come from the deserving; "Anugraha" or special grace - whether the recipient merits it or not: possibly indicating an extraordinary capacity for forgiveness, as well as a tremendous ability to absorb/soak up 'toxin' or 'venom' (since at the end of Kaliyug, with the 'Iron Age' of Kaliyug at its peak... there is likely to be epic/unprecedented levels of it ~ so (maybe) this avatar can be called 'super-ghanshyam'); the power to create a new order of life in society, new state of consciousness in individuals ("consciousness" and "conscience" are two different things; "consciousness" is awareness, sentience - the ability to feel, perceive, comprehend or to experience. It is necessary for cognition); power to support and sustain what is inherently good, which may happen to be defenseless; the power to 'destroy' or dispel negative aspects ('darkness of the mind': ego/ahamkara, negative pride, delusion, ignorance, etc), and the like. [However, the 'wheel needs to keep turning'.] On a separate note: How long ago did the last great deluge/flood (Mahajal Pralaya) happen: one, one-and-a-half or two maha-yugs ago? ~ In which case, some amount of the information, knowledge, etc are courtesy the Manu-s and other higher beings? For what duration did the people have to travel by specially-built ships, etc - one-and-a-half generation or a couple of generations? ~ My guess is as good as yours. Also, going forward... (e.g.) will the maha-avatars appear as combined (all-embracing) avatars (and address/interact with humanity) or not ~ my guess is as good as yours.  

The "Kalki-mahaavatar" (Vishnu-Kalki) is not quite the 'Apocalyptic Horse Rider', but protector and preserver. He is also a trailblazer (guide/sarathy, path-finder), a pioneer of epic/heroic proportions:an action-oriented/practical doer who will take charge and courageously walk alone into the unknown/unfamiliar ~ to protect and to preserve (at a time when the 'Iron Age'/negative effects of Kaliyug is at its peak: when dharma, karma, perception/cognition, values, ethics and principles, et al fall below the minimum level; when tamasic-ness holds sway... bringing about ignorance and delusion in the mind, resulting in stagnation, decay and loss of awareness ~ which in turn causes the consciousness to become enveloped by a 'fog'.Thus, people will be too busy working at cross-purposes and/or in pursuit of narrow/parochial interests. Hence, he alone will 'pull chestnuts out of the fire'. ~ In the 'Iron Age' of Kaliyug... since tamasic-ness holds sway, the heart of mankind is hard and cold like iron. And so, the 'Iron Age' of Kaliyug is also called the 'Machine Age'(an age characterized by lack of humaneness/humanistic values and concerns, desensitized). The name Kalkiḥ means literally, "of iron" or "machine". It does not imply that this avatar is a robot made of metal, but that his birth is in the 'age of iron or machines' (an age characterized by lack of humaneness/humanistic values and concerns, desensitized), an age when perception/perspective/cognitive abilities too get dulled. The Vedic scriptures describe time in a cycle of four ages or yugs: the Golden Age (Sat/Satya/Krita Yug), Silver Age (Treta Yug), Copper Age (Dvapar Yug) and Iron Age (which is at its peak at the end of Kaliyug). Kalkiḥ is (thus) the Avatar of the 'iron or machine age'(an age characterized by lack of humaneness/humanistic values and concerns, desensitized) ~ also called the age of ignorance and darkness (pessimism, loss of hope, confusion, decay, degeneration, stagnation, apathy, and so on). It is regarded as the most degenerate/decayed of the ages, characterized by a hardening of the spiritual core of mankind, and extreme apathy/ennui/indifference and materialism. Not only would the lower modes of material nature become so strong that people will lose interest in the doctrine of dharma and karm, they will also be too strongly in the mode of ignorance/materialism/indifference/perfunctoriness to even comprehend the basic concepts of dharma and karm. Therefore, this maha-avatar will not come to preach (unlike the Buddha-avatar - the Enlightened One. Also, as the Krishn-avatar he has already said all that he had to say.) Instead, he will be action-oriented... and will also lead by example ~ to "awaken" mankind, to urge them into introspection: so that it leads to a natural process of unraveling (from ignorance to discovery and from reformation to transformation). [Sat/Satya/Krita Yug is the time for spiritual transition wherein humans reach a higher level of existence, by moving out of his or her inferior manas (lower mind or lower self) and into the superior manas (higher mind or Higher Self... leading to a better society and civilization.] ~ However, there is no magic wand. Also, instant transformation is impractical; it is akin to putting a lump of fine gold (signifying 'Golden Age' - Sat/Satya/Krita Yug) into a glass of water. The gold will remain gold; the water will remain as it is. Instead, positive change/transformation will be gradual, slow but steady... through patience and collective effort; this will enable society and humanity to "heal"... so as to rejuvenate/reinvigorate itself sufficiently enough to find its rhythm... which in turn will lead to a better civilization. [His purpose is to revitalize the concepts of karm and dharma (actions that lead to a better society).] However, in this 'manthan' he will be alone; there will be no one of the caliber and stature of (e.g.) Arjun or even Chandragupta Maurya - to work with him. Therefore, in all likelihood, he will make do with what is available to him. Also, this maha-avatar will remain among humans for the shortest time, and will accomplish all that needs to be done (to protect and to preserve as well as to guide) in about twenty years: he will reform, guide and navigate; devise and create; break new ground; lead by example; clear past 'cobwebs' and absorb 'toxin'/venom; hold a mirror to society; 'turn the wheel'; lift the 'fog' of tamasic-ness/illusion/delusion/pessimism, etc - so as to "awaken" the mind (and not the heart ~ 'coz when the perceptive/cognitive abilities have diminished or dulled - especially in this 'Machine Age' - when the negative aspects/'Iron Age' of Kaliyug is at its peak... appealing to the heart will give rise to confusion) - to urge humanity into introspection ~ to "close" the current maha-yug and set the stage/lay the foundations for the Sat/Satya/Krita Yug of the next cycle to manifest, and so on.] Thus, this maha-avatar is an out-an-out Super-smart "Knight" riding (an allegorical) white stallion (white winged horse - Devadatta): A 'workhorse' ~ steadfast, dynamic, sagacious, non-preachy, hard working, dependable and a high-achieving/accomplished person - with great intellectualhorsepower, strength and talent. ['Workhorse' is not literal. It is a colloquial way of indicating 'eternal battery life' - a diligent, non-pompous, far-sighted, determined and dependable performer, tough enough to take on multiple challenges/extreme variables (choppy waters)... to bring about positive change as well as to protect and to preserve. Impediments or challenges will not daunt him; he will find a way, no matter what. A path-finder (guide/sarathy, pioneer, trailblazer) ~ he will navigate, innovate, devise and create: a doer and a thought leader, as well as a catalyst for positive change. (The 'white' horse = the allegorical/metaphoric "pure white lotus"/ Puṇḍarīka/Pundarika; pure white signifies pristine, pure knowledge. It is also indicative of his kuṇḍalinī [do read paragraph #9 - to know more about Kundalini], which is vital for all the 7 Chakras - centers of Prāṇa, life force, or vital energy - to be fully activated. Chakras correspond to vital points in the physical body i.e. major plexuses of arteries, veins and nerves. [For 'Sudarshan Chakra' ~ do refer to paragraph # 18 ~ from the top.] The current kalpa is known as the "Svhetavaraha Kalpa". [Svheta = white. Varaha = the great boar. Do refer to the Indus seal above to know more about the symbolism behind "Varaha".])However, this maha-avatar... may not be that easily recognizable (unlike say the Krishn-avatar) ~ given that the 'Iron Age' of Kaliyug is at its peak: mental faculties diminish, perception/cognitive abilities get dulled. Also, since no one knows or can authenticate how the maha-avatars (great incarnations) actually look like, what we get to see is based on various people's imagination, ... and so, some amount of 'creative liberty' comes in. For example, in the third picture (or rather, in all four of them), the Kalki-mahaavatar should be depicted carrying a brilliant comet-like sword (or wielding a comet like a sword) ~ signifying knowledge, discernment and wisdom: To dispel tamasic-ness: ignorance, pessimism and so on; to reform and to guide; to clear past 'cobwebs' and 'toxin'/venom; to reinvigorate the principles of "dharma" and "karm" - thus, he will also lead by example; to establish peace, and prevent chaos/Pralaya on Earth; to bring to an "end" the present yug-cycle/to "close" the maha-yug (the four-yug cycle, including the 'Iron Age' of Kaliyug); to "awaken" the humans who live at the end of Kaliyug... leading to a gradual transformation (through a process of learning and unlearning) thereby (gradually) leading to a better society and civilization; to set the stage/lay the foundations for the Sat/Satya/Krita Yug of the next cycle to manifest. However, the 'wheel needs to keep turning'. (Please read the previous five paragraphs - for greater clarity.) This (blue) maha-avatar is the possessor of Sattva gunas (Sattvic qualities/traits). For Buddhists, the Kalki-avatar is (very likely) Kalki-Maitreya (the future Buddha, ruler of the fabled/mythical kingdom of Shambhala). ~  'How shall we know him?' asked Ananda. ~ The Blessed One (the Buddha) replied: 'The Buddha that will come after me will be known as Maitreya, which means kindness or friendliness.' [In Buddhist literature his name is known as Metteya (or Metteyya with two y's) in Pali, or Maitreya in Sanskrit. Thus the name could mean, 'One whose name is kindness or friendliness' (Pāli: mettā or maitrī/maitree in Sanskrit). Maitreya could also mean, 'One who brings about maitrī'. A more fluent translation of Metteya in English would be "friend" ~ since maitrī (Pāli: mettā) is in turn derived from the noun mitra (Pāli: mitta) which means "friend". Buddha is derived from the root "Budh", meaning both to "wake up" and "to know". Thus, Buddha = One who is Enlightened or "Awakened". Lord Maitreya, the World Teacher, is the Maitreya Buddha or Buddha Maitreya, the future Buddha ~ the Buddha of the future: the next Buddha-to-be after Gautama Buddha/Sakyamuni Buddha.] Now, whether the Kalki-mahaavatar is also (e.g.) the Saoshyant of the Zoroastrians ~ my guess is as good as yours. ... On a separate note, one wonders what the confusion and concern over the Mayan calendar ~ supposedly predicting the 'end of the world' (on December 21, 2012) was all about? Was it misunderstood or misinterpreted? Did the Mayans actually predict apocalypse/'end of the world'? Or, did they indicate the end of an era/yug (as they saw it)... and the subsequent transition into another? ~ My guess is as good as yours. (Maybe, a deeper study of their literature will throw more light.) [Note: The incarnations of the Lord are innumerable, like rivulets flowing from inexhaustible sources of water. Apart from the direct incarnations, there are innumerable empowered incarnations. The indirectly empowered ones are called vibhūtis. However, the Kalkiḥ-maha-avatar is the Almighty (jagat-patiḥ: the Lord of the Universe/Creation) Himself (albeit, in the flesh)... and so, cannot be monopolized or confined to any specific faith (given that the end of Kaliyug will be unlike that of Dvapar; unlike Dvapar, it is not merely the end of a yug (within a Chatur-yuga: a four-yug cycle: Sat/Satya/Krita, Treta, Dvapar and Kaliyug). Rather, the end of Kaliyug will be the end of a complete Mahayug itself... and the commencement/transition into another (a whole new Maha Yug or Chatur-yuga.) Besides, there would be many paths/faiths... therefore, his message will be for all) ~ "Ekam Sat Vipraha Bahudha Vadanti" ~ Truth is one, but the wise know/call it as many | God is one, but we can approach Him in many ways. ~ "Whosoever comes to Me, through whatsoever form, I reach him; all men are struggling through paths which in the end lead to me." The Srimad Bhagavad Geeta (Chapter 10, Verse 20) says: || aham atma gudakesha sarva-bhutasaya-sthitah aham adis ca madhyam ca bhutanam anta eva ca || ~ "I am the Supreme Spirit/Supersoul, O Arjun, seated in the hearts of all living entities. I am the beginning, the middle and the end of all beings." ~ The Almighty is present within the heart of every heart as the Supersoul and thus, there is no distinction between differing bodies. Also, since all knowledge and all the Vedas (of all paths/faiths) flow from the Almighty Himself... this maha-avatar will also hold a mirror to the interpolations and extrapolations. [However, "religion" - as we understand today, is man-made; what the Almighty imparts is knowledge, wisdom and guidance. For Him humanity is humanity.] ... The Kalkih-mahaavatar will (in a manner of speaking, that is) also display another aspect of His Vishwaroop (the Universal Form) ~ "Ekam Sat Vipraha Bahudha Vadanti" ~ Truth is one, but the wise call/know it as many | God is one, but we can approach Him in many ways. ~ That: the Almighty is not a monolith or unidimensional; He has no one 'form' or name. And that: "Ekam Sat" ~ Truth is One. [Maybe, this could be the reason why some consider this mahaavatar as the Sampoorna (complete, total) Avatar)] ... However, like all other avatars and maha-avatars, the Kalki-mahaavatar too is unlikely to announce himself: the Almighty is the creator and benefactor of mankind/humanity [Narayan = the benefactor of mankind/humanity; nara/nar = humanity.] He guides, "awakens", protects, enlightens, as well as showers his blessings and munificence on earth and on humanity everywhere. | The Śrīvatsa mark on Lord Narayan's chest... symbolizes His consort Sri Sri Lakshmi Devi. Vishnu is thus Srivatsankita - the one who bears the sign of Srivatsa.[Srivatsa (the beloved of Sri) is an ancient auspicious symbol in India. It is a mark on the chest of Vishnu where His consort Sri Sri Lakshmi Devi resides. It is also a mark of His immortality/eternal life.] It is said that the Kalki-mahaavatar - the 10th (and final) Maha Avatar of Lord Narayan - will be the bearer of the Srivatsa mark. (SrivatsavakshaaH is another name for Shri Vishnu. The Śrīvatsa mark also adorns the images of the Jain Tirthankaras and of the Buddha.) However, the Śrīvatsa mark is symbolic of a deeper spiritual concept: Devi Lakshmi represents the Jiva-atma (the individual soul). Her union with Lord Vishnu represents 'Moksha' - which is the highest goal in Spirituality. The kundalini ('serpent power'; do read paragraph #9 - to know more about Kundalini) when reaching the Sahasrara/the crown chakra (the highest chakra; kuṇḍalinī is vital for all the 7 Chakras - centers of Prāṇa, life force, or vital energy - to be fully activated. Chakras correspond to vital points in the physical body i.e. major plexuses of arteries, veins and nerves. [For 'Sudarshan Chakra' ~ do refer to paragraph # 18 ~ from the top]) provides the gateway to 'liberation' from the cycle of birth, death and re-birth (moksha). This state is also said to be the state of complete wisdom. It emphasizes the deep connection of jiva-atma (the individual soul) and the param-aatma (the Supersoul, the Almighty). This union of Jiva-aatma (the individual/human soul) with the Param-aatma (Supersoul/Atman/Almighty) is called "Sanaatan Dharma": connecting with the Higher Self or seeking communion with the Universal Consciousness (Sat-cit-ānanda: eternal bliss of self-realization) ~ "swa" is "higher self", "asti" meaning "being", and "ka" as a suffix, so the translation can be interpreted as: "being with higher self". Lord Narayan is also known as "Svasti": One who is the source of all auspiciousness. Thus, "Sanaatan Dharma" is the eternal and enlightened  'way of life'... leading to a better society and civilization. Lord Narayan is "Sarathy" - the guiding force for the jiva-atmas... and hence, He is the lord who steers humanity through the path of illumination (sūrya-dvāreṇa). He enlightens our intellect. (Please read the 2nd and 3rd paragraph from the top - to get the drift.) Note on Shambhala: In Tibet, this legendary land of spiritual (adhyatmic) enlightenment is known as Shambala, a Sanskrit word that to the Tibetans means "the source of happiness". In India, this sacred land is known as the abode of the enlightened and Siddha-s, and described as a supreme place of universe. It is taken as the world's spiritual powerhouse, the true centre of the planet, the heartbeat of whole universe, the base of spiritual consciousness, heart of divinity and the land of great Rishi-s. Guru Nanakdev-ji called it Sach Khand. It is our past - our future - yet exists in our present. It is the 'land of bliss' (eternal bliss/spiritual ecstasy of self-realization ~ Sat-cit-ānanda) of the earliest Vedic times. It is also called "Aryavarsha" (abode of the Aryans/Arya people; the Land of the Noble Ones) ~ the land from which the Vedas (Book of Knowledge or Book of Enlightenment; Veda comes from the root 'Vid' which means, "to know") came from. [Aryan is not a 'race', it means noble or noble-natured; it is a 'way of life' rooted in noble ethics/principles. They followed a pattern of life based on Arya-Dharma, Arya ethics/tenets or a noble way of life. Not that there was any do's and don'ts; Aryan-ness was simply their 'way of life'; they were inherently noble.]It is ahome for immortals. [Some believe Shambhala to be the actual Rishikesh or 'Agni Tirtha'. (Agni Gayatri Mantra: || AUM Maha jwalaya Vidhmahe Agni devaya Dheemahe Thanno Agni Prachodayath || ~ AUM, Let me meditate on the great flame, O God of fire, give me higher intellect, And let the Fire God (the foremost amongst the five elements of nature/PanchaBhuta) illuminate my mind. || AUM Vaiswanaraya Vidhmahe Laaleelaya Dheemahe Thanno Agni Prachodayath || ~ AUM, Let me meditate on the flame that digests/purifies, O merger of all, give me higher intellect, And let the Fire God illuminate my mind.) ~ Apparently, the actual Kailash is located somewhere close to Shambhala. ~ Shivah (paradoxical and complex) is the Lord of mercy and kindness. He is also the destroyer and the restorer (simultaneously): He is the destroyer of ego/ahamkara, ignorance, illusion, etc; he is also the great ascetic (hamsan, "yogi"; do read the fourth paragraph from last... to know more about "yogi" and "detachment"), and the kind herdsman (shepherd) of souls (jiva-atmas/human or individual souls.) Rudra-Śiva: Rudra means: the dispeller of darkness and usherer of peace. He is called "the archer" (Sanskrit: Śarva) and the arrow is an essential attribute of Rudra. The word is derived from the Sanskrit root śarv, which means, "to negate" or "to dispel". Hence, the name Śarva can be interpreted as: "One who can dispel/drive away darkness". The names Dhanvin ("bowman") and Bāṇahasta("archer", literally: "Armed with arrows in his hands"/ Bāṇa = arrow, hasta = hand) also refer to archery/the archer. Rudra is described as armed with a bow and fast-flying arrows (baan/bāṇa). Rudra: also means: one who makes everyone weep: "ru", to cry or to teach, "rud", to make a person weep, and "dra" to flow. Hence Rudra is considered as a deity who teaches the supreme knowledge to all and whose energy flows in everything. Rudra essentially means, "to go beyond suffering". When the word is split as RU and DRA it implies "flight from lamentation", or "travel away from tears" - a state beyond suffering. Rudra is sometimes referred to as "The Father of the Universe" (bhuvanasya pitaraṃ) or "The Lord or Sovereign of the Universe" (īśānādasya bhuvanasya). He is also "the roarer". In the Rgveda, he has been praised as the "mightiest of the mighty". Rudra can also mean: "the red one, the brilliant one" from a lost root rud-, "to be red" or "to shine". ~ "rukh draavayathi, iti rudraha" - where 'rukh' means sorrow/misery, 'draavayathi' means to drive out or eliminate and 'iti' means that which or he who, implies 'Rudra' to be the eliminator of darkness/ignorance and usherer of peace. In other contexts the word rudra can simply mean Ekadasa Rudras- the eleven forms of Rudra or Lord Shiva. The word "rudraksha" (Sanskrit: rudrākşa= rudra and akşa"eye"), or "eye of Rudra", is used as a name both for the berry of the Rudraksha tree, and a name for a string of the prayer beads made from those seeds. Rudra is said to have healing remedies, as the best physician of physicians, and as possessed of a thousand medicines. This is described in Shiva's alternative name Vaidyanatha (Lord of Remedies). || Om Namo Bhagavate Rudraya || The word "Virupaksha" (one with oblique eyes) is used for (indicates) Vishnu as well as Shiva. [As to: whether Rudra-Śiva, Harirudra, Ghanshyam, Neelkanth, Hari-Hara, Shambhu Nath, Shankaranarayan, Hayagreeva, Kaal-Purush, Mohan-Mohini, Vaidyanatha, Dhanvantari, et al are different entities, or one and the same ~ my guess is as good as yours.]~ The three eyes of Lord Shiva suggest: the Sun is his right eye; the Moon is the left eye and fire (agni - the foremost among purifiers and one of the five elements/PanchaBhuta), the third eye. The "third eye" (very likely) indicates the Ajnea chakra (Brow Chakra, the 6th chakra, the third eye chakra ~ denoting spiritual guidance.) The word ajnacomes from the Sanskrit root which means 'to know, to obey and to follow'.Among Indians, it is also known as the "divya chakshu" (the divine eye) or the eye of knowledge. The third eye chakra is located in the brain, directly behind the eyebrow center at the top of spinal chord i.e. at the medulla oblongata. A two-petalled lotus symbolizes Ajna chakra. The left petal represents the moon or the ida nadi and the right petal represents the sun or the pingla nadi. Within the two-petalled lotus is a perfectly round circle that symbolizes the "shoonya" or the void i.e. the state completely devoid of ego/ahamkara. In this circle the symbol Om is written. 'Om' is the mantra and the symbol of ajna chakra. ~ However, is there a deeper meaning to this? Does this indicate the actual "manas-sarovar" or even Rudraprayag or "Prayāga" (confluence) - the sacred union of the three (allegorical) "rivers"? [Manas = Sanskrit "mind" from the root maan - "to think". Mahat or universal mind is the source of manas: what manas is in the human constitution, mahat is in the cosmic constitution. Manas, is thus a direct ray from the cosmic mahat.] ~ My guess is as good as yours. Shambhala is also considered to be the gateway between the physical and spiritual world ~ Haridvar? The Hindu and Buddhist alike regard Mount Meru as the location of Shambhala. (Meru is said to be situated in the center of the earth.) It is the center of the cosmos. Its summit is believed to align to the wheeling constellation of Ursa Major, the Seven Stars that circle the Pole. [Note:The abode of the 33 Vedic gods (Svarga-Loka) also known as the Trayastriṃśa in Buddhist cosmology is located on the peak of Mount Meru, the central 'mountain' of the world. This Loka corresponds to the concept of Heaven as described in the Western sense of the term. Here the King/Ruler/Chief of the Gods/Devas (Higher Beings - highly intelligent, technologically and spiritually far advanced beings, not humans) - Devaraj (Lord of Devas and demi-gods) Indra, rules with his companions - Maruts, Vasus and other divine beings. [If they become further advanced in spiritual conditions - through right inclinations and good karma (i.e. through nishkam karm/selfless action - without expecting anything in return), they can advance to one of the higher Munilokas (Spiritually advanced planets inhabited by [even more] Higher spiritual and enlightened beings). But if they become attached to material enjoyment (indulgence of senses and unbridled desires, etc)... they will degrade into a lower position (e.g.) of a semi-divine being, a Human, or even to the Adho-Lokas/Lower Realms. And through really really really bad/Prarabda Karma, they may even have to suffer in one of the Hellish planets/Narak-Loka.] The task assigned to the Devas (by the Almighty) is to manage the affairs of the universe (e.g. the jiva-aatmas - human souls or individual souls - meet with Dharmaraj Yamaraj and his team, led by Chitrgupt - in Yamaloka*), besides protecting its inhabitants against malevolent entities (could also be 'darkness of the mind').[*To determine which loka they will go to and what they will be re-born as (the concept of Charaiveti: to keep going, in this cycle of samsara - the cycle of birth, death and re-birth - until one attains "moksha" - based on one's karm - nishkam/selfless/non-benefit-seeking action... that contributes towards a better society). ~ Every jiva-atma (human soul or individual soul) will be reborn based on its accumulated Karm phal, the fruits of one's Karm, and (thus) get an opportunity to redeem itself.]Bhuvar-Loka: The planetary system that roughly corresponds to our Solar System and contains Five major planets plus the Sun. (However, there are two planets outside the Solar System included in this - Dhruva Loka or Pole Star and the realm of the Sapta-rishis or Big Dipper.) Bhuvar-Loka are the abodes of Semi-divine beings that are one notch higher than the Humans. (They assist the Devas in various ways and sometimes interact with the humans. Through good karma (nishkam karma/selfless action - without expecting anything in return) and spiritual advancement... they can become a Deva or by indulging in material enjoyment/sensory pleasures, be born as a Human on the Earthly Realms or even lower. Sapta-rishi Loka: The abode of the Seven Great Rishi-s (Enlightened entities) or the Sapta-rishis located below the Dhruva-Loka (near the Dhruva Tara/Pole Star). The seven rishis (who differ according to different Manvantara) are the most advanced spiritual guides for Humanity and have been present at all major time periods of our History. Astronomically, their abode is recognized in the form of the Big Dipper or Ursa Major constellation and it always revolves around the Dhruv-Loka or Pole Star. There are numerous stories and legends in our ancient texts that relate the immense services these rishis have provided to different rulers on our planet - over many yugs/eras/ages. They undertook research, euphemistically known as 'yagna', etc (~ do read paragraph #11 from the top to get the drift.) Probably they were the ones who taught the Sanskrit language to humanity. These rishis were not only men of great wisdom and knowledge, but also masters of Science, including advanced medical science and quantum physics. ~ And, this should also explain how Shri Ram and his siblings were born - via very advanced IVF procedure/therapy - where (perhaps) nothing was injected into the body, instead, it could be ingested! Clearly: 'modern science' is as yet unaware of such advanced medical science, which was known to our ancients in the second era or the Treta Yug itself - courtesy the Sapta-rishi. ~ Therefore, the last great flood/deluge (Mahajal Pralaya) could not have been an ancient phenomenon (rooted in antiquity). ... However, 'Kamadhenu' is not a bovine creature per se. It is a device whose output was far greater than its input. Just like a cow. And therefore, the metaphorof a 'cow' has been used. 'Kamadhenu' was (probably) a multi-purpose device: one that was capable of growing 'synthetic meat' or 'in vitro meat', besides other eatables of course - not from cells/stem cells/tissue of dead fauna, though. It could also develop exact replicas of precious stones - that were equal in shine and value to the original. (As can be gathered from the stories associated with Draupadi and Rishi Jamadagni.)] Shambhala is not heaven on earth... but a mystical kingdom that guards the most sacred spiritual teachings of the world, including the Kalachakra (Wheel of Time), the pinnacle of Buddhist wisdom. Perhaps, Shambhala is synonymous with Shangri-la; or, maybe, the lost kingdom of Shangri-La was inspired by the legend of Shambala. This fabled/mythical land is considered as Siddhabhoomi (Siddha = self-realized; one who has achieved the eternal bliss/spiritual ecstasy of self-realization ~ Sat-cit-ānanda; bhoomi = place. ~ 'Sat' describes an essence that is pure and timeless; 'cit' is consciousness; 'ānanda' is absolute bliss or spiritual ecstasy. A "Siddha" is one whose heart is larger than the universe itself; such a person is "Jeevan Mukt", and can enter into nirvikalpa samadhi to 'awaken' to "Moksha". Do also read paragraph #4 from the last - to get the drift.) However, Shambhala and Shambhu Nath ~ is there a connection? Shambhu Nath is taken as another name for Lord Shiva. ~ But could 'Shambhu Nath' actually mean: Lord/Master/Ruler/Protector/Guardian of Shambhala? [Shambhu ~ is it derived from Shambhala? Nath = Lord/Master/Ruler/Protector/Guardian.] ... And does Shambhala have some sort of connection with the cosmic force known as "Shiva" (responsible for cosmic turbulence/'Tandav' - in the Akash Ganga/Milky Way... that would destroy the effect the moon has on earth: it stabilizes the earth's rotation + has an influence on oceanic tides) - and therefore, trigger Pralaya/Apocalypse? ~ My guess is as good as yours. Shambhala (ruled over by Lord Maitreya/Buddha Maitreya/Maitreya Buddha) is also mentioned in various ancient texts, including the Kalachakra Tantra + other texts that predate Tibetan Buddhism in western Tibet. ~ Therefore, the Kalki-mahaavatar is the Ruler/Guardian/Protector of the legendary kingdom of Shambhala. [So, is he Shambhu Nath? ~ my guess is as good as yours. Another meaning of Shambhala: "Bhal" refers to the forehead. Therefore, Shambhala can also mean: "Born of the Forehead" or "Place of the Forehead" ~ indicating "destiny". The brilliant comet-like sword (or a comet like a sword) that he carries in his hand is the sword of light (signifying enlightenment, to lift the 'fog' enveloping the consciousness; to illumine the mind, to urge humanity into introspection); it is the sword of destiny. He is also an "archer" - "to negate" or "to dispel" ignorance and darkness (pessimism, confusion, decay, degeneration, apathy, and so on).] Lord Narayan/Vishnu is also known as "Shivah" ~ #1. He who is eternally pure. #2. Auspiciousness. ... Therefore, is the depiction of Lord Shiva (with which we all are very familiar) also an allegorical reference to the cosmic "Shiva-force" as well as Shambhu Nath - the Lord/Master/Ruler/Protector/Guardian of Shambhala? Are 'Mahadev' and Shambhu Nath one and the same? Also, is this the reason why OM or AUM is applicable for both Vishnu (the "protector and preserver") and Shiva (the "destroyer")? ~ Hari-Hara or Harirudra or Neelkanth? ~ Is this why Lord Narayan is shown holding the supreme lotus (padma: pink or pale red in colour) - denoting the highest deity? (Do read paragraph #2 - to know more about the symbolism behind various lotus flowers.) || Om Namah Shivaya || ~ is this addressed to the cosmic "Shiva-force" or Shambhu Nath or Hari-Hara or all three? ~ My guess is as good as yours. PS: The depiction of Shambhu Nath is allegorical, not to be taken at face value. As for: whether he really had anything to do with shmashāna, etc... or it came to be associated with him later ~ courtesy the many cultic movements; whether it had anything to do with great yogis like Gorakhnath-ji or not; whether different narratives have confluenced or not (e.g. maybe, Shambhu Nath was also known as Bhoot/Bhuta Nath [Lord/Guardian/Protector of Mankind/Beings - since the human body is made of the five elements of nature/PanchaBhuta] ~ but then, somewhere down the line the word 'bhuta/bhoota' probably underwent a change of meaning, 'coz 'Panchabhuta' or 'Mahapanchabhuta/PanchaMahabhuta' refers to the five elements of nature, 'bhoot' as in 'spirits' is very likely a much recent association ~ my guess is as good as yours. Therefore, aspects like ash smearing, chillum smoking, etc is (probably) courtesy the many cults that sprang up in his name - in the last millennium or so. But then, the way Lord Shiva is depicted is largely allegorical, not to be taken literally.]

There could be a higher being named "Shiva" as well - (possibly) the better-half of the higher being named Parvati. But this "Shiva" (residing in "Shiva-loka") seems to be a somewhat over-generous entity, dispensing boons (i.e. granting wishes) to whosoever propitiates him... without thinking of the consequences thereof. As is captured in the allegorical tale of Bhasmasur: Bhasmāsura (Ash Man) - possibly, a malevolent entity and a denizen of one of the lower planets (Adho-loka) - propitiates Shiva; after a while, pleased with his devotion and diligence, Shiva appears before him... and agrees to grant him a boon (i.e. grant his wish). Bhasmasura asks for immortality (eternal life), but Shiva says that he did not have the power to grant him immortality/eternal life. Thereupon, Bhasmāsuraasks to be granted the power whereby anyone whose head he touches (with his hand) should instantly (burn up and) turn to ashes (bhasma). Pleased to be able to grant a 'boon', Shiva grants this wish. Immediately thereafter, Bhasmāsura tries to 'test' his newly acquired power... and attempts to touch Shiva's head. Shiva, chased by Bhasmāsura, flees... and somehow manages to reach Vishnuloka/Vaikunth - to seek a solution to his predicament. Thereupon, Lord Narayan, as the (ace diplomat and negotiator) - Mohini-avatar - meets Bhasmasura... and confuses him (sufficiently enough) to touch his own head. ~ Thus, Bhasmasura turns into ashes - due to the power he had recently gained. (Please read the last two paragraphs - to know more about the Mohini-avatar.) ~ Therefore, despite the presence of namesake higher entities "Shiva" and "Brahma" (the Chief Engineer/Scientist of the cosmos) - is Lord Narayan Himself the Cosmic "Trinity" or Trimūrti - in charge of the cosmic functions of creation, maintenance/preservation and dissolution/destruction? ... And is that why He is shown holding the supreme lotus (padma: pink or pale red in colour) - denoting the highest deity (Satyam-Shivam-Sundaram/Purushottam Satya/Satya-Sundar)?(Do read paragraph #2 - to know more about the symbolism behind various lotus flowers.) ~ Is He Himself the "Satyam-Shivam-Sundaram" (Truth/Dharma-Auspiciousness-Beauty/Goodness): #1. Brahmn and Srashtaa: Supreme Creator and Lord of Creation; Prapitaamahah: The father of the 'father of beings' (Brahma) - one who instructs Lord Brahma. #2. Vishnu: "Harih/Hari" - the "protector and preserver"; the motive power and guiding spirit behind the mathematically precise universes. #3. Shivah: a. He who is eternally pure. b. Auspiciousness. Shambhu Nath - the Lord/Master/Ruler/Protector/Guardian of Shambhala, as well as "Hara" - the "destroyer" (dissolution).) ... And, therefore, is Lord Narayan the "Kaal-Purush" [Time] Himself? ~ My guess is as good as yours. From what one can gather, Lord Narayan is an astonishingly brilliant, energetic, creative, sagacious, non-pretentious/non-conceited, wise, magnanimous and enlightened being - the Ultimate, Übergod.[When I read the Bhagavad-Gita and reflect about how God created this universe everything else seems so superfluous. ~ Albert Einstein.] Lord Narayan is also immensely generous and bountiful: He is the Lord of Creation/Universe/Earth: therefore, everything on earth - whether seen or unseen, tangible or intangible, animated or inanimate... has been bestowed by Him, and symbolically represents Him (His Universal Form). | ~ There is a vast 'ocean' (the 'ocean of Garbha') present at the bottom of our universe. This 'ocean' is very likely a combination of cosmic dust, energy and gas, even gas hydrates formed under conditions of high pressures and low temperatures, and so on... and maybe, even a great amount of suction force. Its appearance is in the form of 'concentric circles or bands'... though none of it is visible to the unaided eye. During "Prakritik Maha Pralaya" ~ at the end of Brahma's Lifetime/Life-span (this is when Prakriti/Material Nature [except the Vaikunth planets] is completely dissolved) - Prakriti/Material Nature 'dissolves' into this 'ocean of Garbha'. ~ Our ancients visualized this 'ocean of Garbha' as the endless serpent 'Adi-Sesha' or 'Ananta-Sesha'. [Ananta = infinity, endless, eternal. Sesha = zero, shunya.] "Prakritik Maha Pralaya" (dissolution) occurs when 'Ananta' becomes 'Sesha', infinity becomes zero and Yog-maya (the ever changing and evolving/ 'illusory' [mayamayi or transient] Prakriti/Material Universe/Nature) becomes Yog-nidra (the big sleep). Therefore, in a manner of speaking, it is said that when Adishesa 'uncoils', time (kaal, kaalah) moves forward and creation takes place. When Adisesha/ Śeṣanāga 'coils back', the universe ceases to exist. ("Shesha" in Sanskrit texts, especially those relating to mathematical calculation, also implies the "remainder" - that which remains when all else ceases to exist.) ~ So, very likely, what is today known as the "Shiv Ling" was actually a depiction of this above phenomenon. (Maybe the Gupta emperors installed it... to depict of the cosmic phenomenon of "creation" and "dissolution".) However, with the passage of time - possibly after the decline of the Gupta era - due to various interpolations, extrapolations, mistranslations and so on, it has now come to be understood/regarded as the "Shiv Ling". ... And so, the original depiction has not only undergone several changes, but a lot of knowledge has also been obliterated along with it. Alas. Plus, we have no way of knowing what it was originally called either. Alas. However, one can only marvel at the ancients' immense knowledge and vaulting imagination. They could - so effortlessly - simplify complex science... that even a child could easily grasp it. Amazing, indeed. | Vadavagni is a form of Agni (fire) and is depicted as a mare that breathes fire. [Agni/fire is the foremost among purifiers. Agni has been worshipped since time immemorial... throughout 'Aryavarta' ('Arya-lands' or 'land of Aryas/Aryans'; in other words, 'land inhabited by Arya people' - noble-natured people who followed a pattern of life based on noble/Arya tenets/principles. Not that there was any do's and don'ts; Aryan-ness was simply their 'way of life'; they were inherently noble-natured.) There are more hymns to Agni in the Rg Ved than to any other God/dev/element. Agni is also one of the five elements ([maha]panchabhuta or PanchaBhuta).] It is believed that it is the escape of this 'fire' (Vadavagni) from under the 'ocean' (the 'ocean of Garbha'), which will finally consume the current cycle of creation and prepare the universe for the next cycle of creation. [Now whether this 'fire' is an allegorical way of (also) indicating some great force/energy like a tremendous suction force ~ my guess is as good as yours.] Vadavagni is (believed to be) located beneath the 'ocean' (very likely, the 'ocean of Garbha') and is allegorically depicted with the face of a mare. Apparently, mists and clouds are formed due to the activity of Vadavagni (below the 'ocean'/'ocean of Garbha'). It also prevents the 'ocean' from consuming the land (euphemism for Prakriti/Material Universe/Nature?) [Probably meaning: that Vadavagni (allegory for a tremendous force/energy?) causes the (metaphoric) 'ocean water' to 'evaporate' and turn into 'mist', thus preventing the 'ocean' from ever overflowing on to land/earth (euphemism for Prakriti/Material Universe/Nature?)] It is said that just before 'Pralaya' (cataclysmic events), Vadavagni will stop doing this, causing the 'ocean' to expand and submerge the land/earth (euphemism for Prakriti/Material Universe/Nature?) At that time, Vadavagni will burst forth as (in the form of) 'volcanoes' from under the 'ocean' and escape (i.e. the fire of devastation will [gradually] consume the whole of Prakriti/Material Nature; maybe, euphemism for a great suction force.) [Srimad Bhagavad-Gita 11.32: śrī-bhagavān uvāca (The Blessed One said): || kālo 'smi loka-kṣaya-kṛt pravṛddho || ~ "Now I am Time (kālo 'smi), the destroyer of all." Alternatively: "Time I am, the shatterer of worlds."~ He is referring to "dissolution". [Note: The first atomic bomb was detonated on July 16, 1945, in the Trinity test in New Mexico; Oppenheimer, often called the "father of the atomic bomb", remarked later that it brought to (his) mind words from the Bhagavad Gita. He interpreted it as: "Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds." ~ We knew the world would not be the same. A few people laughed, a few people cried, most people were silent. ... I suppose we all thought that one way or another. ~ After the war he became a chief adviser to the newly created United States Atomic Energy Commission and used that position to lobby for international control of nuclear power to avert nuclear proliferation and an arms race with the Soviet Union. After provoking the ire of many politicians with his outspoken opinions during the Second Red Scare, he had his security clearance revoked in a much-publicized hearing in 1954, and was effectively stripped of his direct political influence; he continued to lecture, write and work in physics.] | Here are a few more verses: BG 11.12: || divi surya-sahasrasya bhaved yugapad utthita yadi bhah sadrisi sa syad bhasas tasya mahatmanah || ~ "If the radiance of a thousand suns were to suddenly burst forth in the sky, that would be like the light of the noble one/supreme consciousness." |  Srimad Bhagavad-Geeta 10.8: || aham sarvasya prabhavo mattah sarvam pravartate || ~ "I am the source of all spiritual and material worlds. Everything emanates from Me." | Srimad Bhagavad-Geeta 10.33: || dvandvah samasikasya ca aham evakshayah kalo dhataham vishvato-mukhah  || ~ "And among compound words I am the dual compound. I am also inexhaustible Time (evakshayah kalo), and of Creators, I am Brahma."| Srimad Bhagavad-Gita 10.34: 1st stanza: || mṛtyuḥ sarva-haraś cāham udbhavaś ca bhaviṣyatām || ~ "I am all-consuming time, and I am the generating principle/cause/energy of all that is yet to be."(Alternatively: "I am all-consuming time, and I am too the birth of all that shall come into being.") | 2nd stanza:  || kīrtiḥ śrīr vāk ca nārīṇāḿ smṛtir medhā dhṛtiḥ kṣamā || ~ Among women I am glorious deeds (kīrtiḥ), radiance (śrīr), fine speech/persuasion (vāk), memory/clarity of thought/discernment (smṛtir), intelligence (medhā), resilience/steadfastness (dhṛtiḥ) and patience/forgiveness/magnanimity (kṣamā).| Srimad Bhagavad-Gita 10.23: || rudranam sankaras casmi ||~ "Of all the Rudras I am Sankara [Lord Siva]; || vasunam pavakas casmi meruh sikharinam aham || ~ of the Vasus I am fire [Agni - the foremost one;the foremost among purifiers and one of the five elements/PanchaBhuta], and of mountains I am Meru." [Note: Agni: All creation-related work is the work of Fire. The Cosmic, the Solar and the Planetary Devas work with Fire (Brahm-jyotih?) All formations at all levels is work of Fire. Fire is the essence of all existence. Fire is the basis of all life. Fire is the means of development. Fire is the builder, the preserver and the destroyer. Fire is purifier and is the consumer of all. Fire is God. God is Fire. From atom to cosmos Fire stands as the basis. When the Fires blend and blaze the apparent existence ceases. Seeming non-existence remains. The latter is called God beyond creation. The former is called God in creation. Fire is internal, inherent and latent. Fire is radiatory and emanating. Fire is vivifying and stimulating. Fire transmits and transmutes. Fire is the originator. Study of Fire and its work in creation itself elevates. Veda contains thousands of verses praising Fire and describing its functions. Fire is called Agni in Sanskrit. Agni's blessing is invoked. When we say Agni it has a deeper meaning. BG 10.33: || akṣarāṇām a-kāro 'smi || ~ "Of letters I am the letter 'A'." ~ The sound 'A' is the foremost of the sounds. All the alphabets begin with the letter 'A', thus is number 1. Before number one it can only be zero (shunya). Zero (shunya) is the potential Creation, the Cosmic Egg, which would manifest in due course of time, and Fire (Brahm-jyotih?) is the basis for such manifestation. All the planes of existence are the result of the work of Agni. Agni transforms; transforms that which is subtle to gross and also transforms the gross to subtle. In the beginning it is from subtle to gross and later from gross to subtle. The evolution and involution is the work of Agni. Hence Agni is the basis of the Cosmic Devas (possibly: demi-gods, like Indra, et al), Solar Devas (possibly: Lord Surya/Surya Dev, et al) and Planetary Devas (semi-divine beings, etc). It is Him that even the Devas worship because the whole work starts from Him. The whole creation-related work commences from Him and He is the one who emerges from the unknown to the known as the Cosmic Bang. The dynamism in us is also Fire. The Kundalini 'Fire' causes enlightenment of the brain cells. But enflaming the Kundalini 'Fire' requires service to the fellow beings, to the society (selfless/non-benefit-seeking/nishkam service/action... that contributes towards a better society.) One has to dedicate oneself to nishkam karm... without which the Kundalini 'Fire' is not ignited. Agni: exists as Cosmic Fire, Solar Fire and as Frictional Fire. The KundaliniFire is Frictional Fire, when it is below the diaphragm. When it is above the diaphragm, it is already Solar Fire, and when it reaches the brain, it is Electric Fire (brilliant white). As one progresses regularly (in nishkam karm), the brilliance of the 'Golden disc' grows. Just as the morning Sun who is Golden in colour grows to brilliant white, the 'Golden disc/chakra' visualized at the eyebrow centre rises to Ajnea center/chakra and shines forth like a diamond disc/chakra. This is the final state of the Kundalini'Fire'. When this 'chakra' opens, it is deemed as the opening of the Third Eye. ~ On a separate note: Agni also symbolically represents the spiritual fire of life and the processes of transformation. It is the foremost amongst purifiers. Agni does not indicate/signify "tyag" per se; Agni is the greatest of purifiers and the foremost amongst the five elements of nature - PanchaBhuta (also: PanchaMahaBhuta or MahaPanchaBhuta). ~ Agni signifies "tyag" in the sense (to indicate) one has conquered oneself; in other words: that one has conquered/overcome the negativities residing in one's heart and mind. And thereby, become a Siddha. ~ Siva: There are eleven Rudras, of whom Sankara, Lord Siva, is preeminent. He is the 'destroyer'/dispeller of the modes of ignorance in the universe. He is the 'destroyer' and the restorer (simultaneously): He is the 'destroyer' of ego/ahamkara, negative pride, ignorance, etc; He is also the great ascetic (hamsan, "yogi"; do read the fourth paragraph from last... to know more about "yogi" and "detachment"), and the kind herdsman (shepherd) of souls (jiva-atmas/human or individual souls. He is also "Neelkanth" (the blue-throated one) - one who takes in halahala or Kaalkoot - resulting out of 'societal manthan/churn' - for the good of humanity/mankind ~ to enable it to evolve, function better and progress. ~ Halahala or Kaalkoot: the most vicious and venomous "poison" - that would destroy society and humanity if allowed to spread or accumulate.) For Mt. Meru, situated in the center of the earth - do read the previous paragraph. But what does 'Vishnu as the Kurma-avatar holds up Mt. Meru on his back' really mean?] ~ So what is meant by "Nataraj"... and who really is "Sivam" - the metaphoric 'tandav-dancing'"Nataraj"? Why is "Virupaksha" (one with oblique eyes) used for both Vishnu and Siva? Why is OM or AUM used for both Vishnu and Siva? ~ My guess is as good as yours.*] ~ Subsequently, the 'ocean' will consume the land/earth (euphemism for Prakriti/Material Nature?) - perhaps 'ocean' is an indicator for the endless serpent 'Adi-Sesha' or 'Ananta-Sesha'. [(Ananta = infinity, endless, eternal. Sesha = zero, shunya.) "Prakritik Maha Pralaya" (dissolution) occurs when 'Ananta' becomes 'Sesha', infinity becomes zero and Yog-maya (the ever changing and evolving/ 'illusory' [mayamayi or transient] Prakriti/Material Nature) becomes Yog-nidra (the big sleep). Therefore, in a manner of speaking, it is said that when Adishesa 'uncoils', time (kaal, kaalah) moves forward and creation takes place. When Adisesha/ Śeṣanāga 'coils back', the universe ceases to exist. ("Shesha" in Sanskrit texts, especially those relating to mathematical calculation, also implies the "remainder" - that which remains when all else ceases to exist.)] Thus, everything will be destroyed by lava and water. All this (very likely) explains "dissolution"/"Prakritik Maha Pralaya" or even "Pralaya" (cataclysmic events). ~ Now, where is this Mount Meru? Is it a real mountain or an allegorical one? Is it the earth's axis of rotation? Is it the Himalayas or a part of the Himalayas? Or, some energy/force connected to the Himalayas? Or, does ancient Jambudvipa have something to do with it? ~ What exactly does the Kurma Avatar mean? Is ancient Jambudvipa (or some parts of it) the allegorical Mount Meru? But then, what areas constituted ancient Jambudvipa? Is the mythical land of Shambhala Mount Meru? And if so, is the "Shambhu Nath" (Ruler/Protector/Guardian of Shambhala) also the allegorical Kurma Avatar... and/or the allegorical Matsya Avata? Or both? In which case, are the Matsya and/or the Kurma avatar the allegorical guardian of Jambudvipa? ~ My guess is as good as yours. [*Note: AUM (also known as OM): The syllable OM (written out as AUM with each letter having its own significance) represents Brahmn, the supreme creator (Srashtaa), as well as the whole of creation. OM represents the Shabda Brahmn. It is the primeval sound - pranavah/Omkara/pranava naad, the sound of the universe itself. The uttering of the sacred and mystical OM is called Onkar or Omkar. It is the sound of the origination and dissolution of the universe. The past, present, future and all that transcends time are all included in this sound. It represents that Jyotiḥ-mayaḥ/Tejasvi - Brahm-jyoti - the Divine effulgence (also referred to as "Brahmn") - emanating from Goloka-Paravyoma (the spiritual abode of Shri Krishn). ~ It is the light that impersonalists perceive in the Nirguna mode of God/Almighty. Lord Narayan is the personification/manifestation (Omswaroop) of OM or AUM. Thus, He is Hariom. He is Omprakash - light of OM, light of the world. Bhairav: The Primordial Sound. In old treatises Bhairav is referred to as the adi-raga and comes attached with a wealth of lore. Bhairav is so fundamental to Indian tradition that its impaction on the nation's musical soul can never be overstated. The holiest of our ragas is Shri Bhairavi. The corresponding raga of Shri Bhairavi is the Raga Bhairava. (Bhairav or Bhairava is another name for Shivah - the cosmic force associated with cosmic turbulence/tandav nritya.) Bhairavi's looming presence in the Indian musical mind is in no small measure on account of it's close association with this great land's spiritual repertoire. No bhajani baithak can be complete without a generous dose of Bhairavi. Sample an early Pt. Bhimsen Joshi rendering this Hari bhajan: jo bhaje Hari ko sada... [Link.] Bhairavi lends itself well to brisk, taut bandishes. Since it is considered to be the holiest of Raaga-s, Bhairavi is respectfully addressed as Shree Bhairavi. ~ The mesmerizing Pt. Omkarnath Thakur - Raag Bhairavi: Link.]

[*(Continued from the paragraph before the last seven) ~besides adequate provision of food supplies and other essential supplies (including water and medicines) they probably also carry large quantities of dietary supplement or Super Food such as Spirulina (powder or capsule). But in what form they carry water, we can only speculate. Once the turbulence subsides, life/civilization starts afresh: perhaps with the help of cryogenically stored seeds, DNA samples (human, livestock and other animals), donor eggs and sperms + the survivors (human + flora + fauna). Perhaps the 'gotra-system' was devised during the last great flood (Mahajal Pralaya) ~ as an interim arrangement/measure ~ to prevent consanguineous vivah/union and avoidable physical ailments and defects, and maybe, to also give the new versions and/or sub-species of humans adequate time to acclimatize. There must also have been some mechanism/guidelines in place ~ to deal with death and corpses; however, this may not have been homogeneous, and would have, in all probability, differed ~ depending on whether the people were traveling onboard ships, or were sheltered in specially-designed-and-equipped caves and in settlements below the ground. Now whether the ones traveling onboard ships threw the bodies in the turbulent waters? ~ We do not know. However, since dead bodies are treated with respect, this is unlikely to have happened. Also, they would have required teachers, storytellers, composers, musicians, artists, doctors (and other medical staff), weavers, barbers, artisans, craftsmen and toy-makers, and so on... to have a semblance of 'society', continuity and order. So as to be somewhat prepared ~ to begin life afresh on new lands. And, very likely, these various functions were taken up by people ~ based on their "varna" (talent and ability). Maybe the "Manu" and his team spoke to them about life on earth, about their ancestors... and perhaps, even showed pictures, videos, presentations and documentaries too ~ in a bid to prepare them for new lands and life anew. ... Once everything is reasonably well-settled, the Manu-s (and their team) depart. (Noukeshwar is at best a 'title' and means, Lord/Master/Principal/Chief/Captain of the Nao. (Here 'nao' or 'boat' indicate specially-designed-and-equipped-ship.) But whether 'Noukeshwar' has been abbreviated/altered to 'Noah' (due to the passage of time and change in phonetics) ~ my guess is as good as yours.) However, there are times when God chooses a great human ~ as "Manu". This chosen one then becomes one of the "Manu"; he is thereafter referred to as a specific "Manu"... and participates in rescue and rehabilitation activities. The seventh and current Manu, Vāmana as Vaivasvata Manu is one such human "Manu". We are currently in the seventh Manvantara, named as: "Vaivasvata Manvantara" (after the current Manu - Vaivasvata Manu). His original name is Satyavrata. He saved mankind from the (previous) great flood/deluge (Mahajal Pralay) ~ by building specially designed ships (nao)... as per the advise of the Matsya-Avatar. Now whether Vaivasvata Manu is also referred to as "Noah" or not ~ my guess is as good as yours. During great flood/deluge (Mahajal Pralay) the entire Earth is inundated by water that swallows up the land and destroys existing landmass/continents; the scale of devastation is mind-boggling. (Some species of flora and fauna are wiped out, and certain early version(s) of humanity too ceases to exist. Maybe some imperfect versions of human species too come to an end. Now, is it possible that these are then replaced by other versions? And if so, do these new versions and/or sub-species of humans, etc arrive from (or maybe are brought in from) other loka/planets that exist in the same band [Madhya-loka/Middle Planets] as our Earth... so as to resettle them after some or the other natural calamities? Therefore, do the Almighty and team [Brahma, et al] create different humans [and flora and fauna] for different maha-yugas? Or are they attempting to create humans-that-have-High EQ as well as humans-that-are-low-on-emotion-and-high-on-technology [for different maha-yugas] ~ and then trying to see/understand how these different versions/sub-species of humans react to each other [in different maha-yugas]? And/or what combination leads to what situation? ~ Well, we can only speculate. (Note: Sanaatan Dharma does not talk about the human species emerging or evolving out of great apes. The extinct civilizations/groups/people also do not say so; there are indications of higher beings; besides, a huge/gigantic serpent features in many extinct cultures/groups. However, it is quite possible that a small group of humans evolved on earth from various animal-like ancestors, not 'animal' per se, but 'animal-like' ~ given the shape of their skull, jawline or teeth, or for that matter their food habits, etc. One possibility is that: this helped to determine the habitability of the earth for future versions of humans ~ that did not evolve on this planet. By the time the latter groups arrived (in batches), the former groups would have evolved and become more human-like, albeit with a distinct culture, language, way of life, etc. And so, for the newer versions of humans, they were, thus, known as "adi-vasi": adi = most ancient, original or earliest known, vasi = dwellers. But then, various groups of humans eventually intermixed... giving rise to newer groups/sub-species, languages, culture, cuisine, and so on.) [Lord Vishnu is also known as "Prapitaamahah": The father of the 'father of beings' (Brahma) ~ in a generic sense, that is; He is Aadi Purush (the Original/Primal Being or the Supreme Being; Purush = Cosmic Energy; He is the motive power and guiding spirit behind the mathematically precise universes.) He is also known as "Srashtaa": Creator. He instructs Brahma, who can be loosely understood as the Chief Engineer/Scientist of the Cosmos (probably responsible for creating various human species and sub-species, flora and fauna, and so on.)] The Cyclical Destruction of the World as we know it, occurs in events singularly known as a "Pralaya" that takes place at the end of a "Chatur-Yug". A cycle of four yugs (Sat/Satya/Krita, Treta, Dvapar and Kali whose lengths follow a ratio of 4:3:2:1) is known as a "Maha Yug" or a "Chatur-Yug", and at the end of this cycle, our Earth experiences a cataclysmic event that has the capacity to wipe out all life from the face of the planet. However, that does not quite happen... since the Manu-s arrive to rescue, rehabilitate and re-people the Earth (in case of a great flood/deluge/Mahajal Pralay). However, Sanaatan Dharm does not believe in a single event of destruction/dissolution of the World, or even in a single event of creation for that matter. Time (Kaal, Kaalah) in Sanaatan Dharma, is not Linear i.e. it does not start and end at specific points, rather, it is Cyclical and never-ending. This eternal cycle of Life and Death; Birth and Re-birth; Formation and Dissolution is called the"Kaal-chakra"or the "Wheel of Time". Therefore, other events such as Global Warming; killer Earthquakes or frequent Earthquakes in the seabed (triggering a Great Deluge that would submerge the entire landmass and drown everything in its colossal Tsunamis); melting of Antarctic Ice sheets; celestial events ~ like a meteor crash; nuclear wars or usage of highly destructive weaponry, and so on... too can bring about dissolution and/or tremendous destruction (enough to wipe out the entire civilizational progress of Humanity on Earth.) And, depending on which of these events is likely to follow the closure of a "Maha Yug" or a "Chatur-Yug" ~ the higher entities (the Manu-s, the avatars or a Maha Avatar) arrive ~ to rescue and rehabilitate/resettle, or to salvage, 'awaken' and prevent. There are different types of Pralaya-s/cataclysmic events as per our ancient texts: #1. A "Pralaya" ~ at the end of a Maha-Yug or a Chatur-Yug; #2. "Manvantar Pralaya" ~ at the end of the rule of each of the Manu-s; #3. "Naimittik Pralaya" ~ at the end of each "kalpa" (1,000 maha yugs) or "a Day of Brahma"; and #4. "Prakritik Maha Pralaya" ~ at the end of Brahma's Lifetime/Life-span (this is when Prakriti/Nature [except the Vaikunth planets] is completely dissolved. Re-birth/formation commences once again... after 2 kalpas, or after 'a day and a night of Brahma' has elapsed. This is when a new Brahma appears. The life span of Brahma is 100 Brahma years, or 72,000 kalpas, or 311.04 trillion human years. (Each "kalpa" is overseen by a succession of 14 Manu-s, and the reign/period of each Manu is called a "manvantara". A single manvantara is approximately 71 maha yugas. In other words: a "Manvantara" is equal to seventy-one times the number of years contained in the four Yugas (Sat/Satya/Krita, Treta, Dvapar and Kaliyug), with some additional years: this is the duration of each Manu, the [attendant] divinities (Indra, etc), and the rest.) The current "Brahma" is 50 Brahma years old now (i.e. 155,521,972,949,110 human Years old now.) 50 years of Brahma has elapsed and we are in the first Day of the 51st year. In other words: We are located in the fifty-first Brahma year of the life of our Brahma: this Brahma's day - kalpa - is named as "Svhetavaraha Kalpa". [Svheta = white. Varaha = the great boar. Do refer to the Indus seal above to know more.] Within this 'Day', six Manvantaras have already elapsed and we are in the seventh Manvantara, named as: Vaivasvatha Manvantara (after the current Manu, Vaivasvatha Manu). Within the Vaivasvatha Manavantara, 27 Mahayugas (4 Yugas together is a Mahayuga) have elapsed; hence, we are in the Kaliyuga of the 28th Mahayuga. (This would place us at about the 454th maha yuga of the 1,000 maha yugas that comprise this 'day' of Brahma.) This Kaliyug began at midnight of 18 February in 3102 BC in the proleptic Julian calendar. This is because Bhagavan Shri Krishn departed on this date. The period after his departure marks the beginning of Kaliyug. Since 50 years of Brahma have already elapsed, we are in the second Parardha, also known as Dvithiya Parardha.] Note: Manu is essentially a reassuring father-figure (not to be construed for 'patriarchal'. A guide or a leader can be a guide or a leader without being patriarchal or matriarchal.) None of the "Manu" is responsible for regressive customs like Sati, female foeticide and infanticide, child marriage, stopping girls'/women's education, 'caste system', and the like.  ("Varna-dharma" or "Varnashram-dharma" is completely different. It is neither rigid nor based on birth. In a nutshell, it is based on "varna" ~ one's talent [aptitude and ability.] The premise is that: doing something based on one's talent and ability leads to efficiency and contentment... which, in turn leads to a better society. Please refer to the paragraph before the last three ~ to know more about it.) All sorts of regressive concepts came about in the last millennium; Manu was not present on Earth at the time. [However, what inflections and re-writings the "manusmriti" has undergone in the last millennium, given that even the Mahabharata has not remained impervious ~ we can only speculate. The current version is not the original one; all ancient texts have to be copied afresh after a period of time, else they disintegrate. Modern books are of fairly recent vintage.] The Manu-s (and team) is representatives of Lord Narayan. ... And all sorts of regressive customs and concepts like 'caste system', etc is not Lord Narayan/Sri Krishn's doing. These came about due to societal churning, courtesy the usurper known as "Brahminical faith".Sanaatan Dharm did not have any concept of "outcaste". However, this concept ~ known as 'jaat-nikaal' or 'jaati-nikaal' ~ came about as a 'by-product' of yet another societal 'manthan' ~ for power, influence, and so on. Wherein one group/clan of people tried their best to topple (and then banish + 'demote') ~ another group of people, on most occasions, their own clan-mates, but who enjoyed greater influence, etc (especially in the courts of minor kings and chieftains.) Mostly these machinations were successful, and the former not only replaced the latter, but also banished and 'demoted' them. This 'demotion' and banishment was known as 'jaat-nikal' or 'jaati-nikal'. [jaat/jaati = clan.] Gradually this concept took on different hues... and mutated, thanks to the "Brahminical faith" and other kinds of 'manthan'. When one set of colonizers arrived, the concept of "caste" came about; when another set of colonizers arrived, 'jaat-nikal' or 'jaati-nikal' became "outcaste", and 'adi-vasi' became "tribal". Though more affluent groups and people were affected, 'coz even traveling to distant lands onboard ships was cause enough to be 'demoted' (more severe than 'déclassé'), considered 'impure' and 'lose one's caste', it was essentially the economically weak and vulnerable groups and adi-vasis that were greatly impacted due to this 'manthan'. But then, despite gaining our independence, we have persisted with negative, regressive and pessimism-inducing terminologies, besides labeling our ancient knowledge (in craftsmanship, textiles, weaves, woodworking, leather-crafting, etc) as "backward". (Although these require a great amount of skill and know-how.) ... Thus, what could and should have been a cause for pride (for keeping alive and carrying forward our ancient heritage) as well as generating revenue, leading to employment and economic self-sufficiency... became "backward" this or that instead. Alas.]

Krishna explains to Arjun his duties as a warrior and prince... besides elaborating on a variety of philosophical concepts. However: it is unlikely that the conversation took place in the battlefield. It probably happened elsewhere, in the presence of other people (over a few days)... and was (very likely) facilitated by the use of technology, such as television screens. This enabled a large number of people (besides Arjun) to "see" the "Divine Form" (Vishwaroop) of the Supreme Spirit/Param-aatma, and to hear Krishna speak about 'Karm Yog' and explain the cosmic process as well as the meaning of destiny. Krishna, Arjun's charioteer and guide in the battlefield (of the greatest of Dharm-Yudh-s), sought to allay the latter's confusion/dilemma by teaching him about the distinction between the physical body (which is impermanent) and the soul or atma (which is permanent). ... And from what we can gather, every human has two souls. #1. The "Jiva/Atma": meaning individual soul or personality, and #2. The "Atman" or "Supersoul": seen as a portion of Brahmn/Brhmn or the Param-aatma (Cosmic Energy/Supreme Soul/Spirit - the source of everything, the 'Cause'; since everything emanates from Him). The Srimad Bhagavad Geeta (Chapter 10, Verse 20) says: || aham atma gudakesha sarva-bhutasaya-sthitah aham adis ca madhyam ca bhutanam anta eva ca || ~ "I am the Supreme Spirit/Supersoul, O Arjun, seated in the hearts of all living entities. I am the beginning, the middle and the end of all beings."] BG Chapter 10, Verse 22: || indriyanam manas casmi bhutanam asmi cetana || ~ "Of the senses (indriyanam) I am (asmi) the mind (manas); and in living beings (bhutanam) I am the living force (cetana, consciousness.") Thus, to my mind, cetana or consciousness represents the "atman" (Supersoul), and this (very likely) is also linked to the mind (brain/Manas Chakra or Mind Lotus)... making it work/function, and which in turn helps the rest of the body to function as well. Else a human being goes into a 'vegetative state' (wherein the 'indriyas' stop functioning, leaving one benumbed or stupefied (the mind, senses, will, etc.) [Please note: Cetana or consciousness represents the life force. It is not the same as conscience.] The atman (Supersoul) is a part and parcel of the Supreme Soul/Spirit (Brahmn/Brhmn/Param-aatma), but the Jiva/atma (individual soul) never loses its identity. And this is where we, as an individual, get an identity/entity. This identity exists eternally; the individual soul (Jiva/Atma) never dies. [Verse 17:  || avinasi tu tad viddhi yena sarvam idam tatam vinasam avyayasyasya na kascit kartum arhati || ~ "But know that which pervades the entire body is indestructible. No one is able to destroy the imperishable soul (Jiva/Atma/ individual soul)."] And that: Verse 18:|| antavanta ime deha nityasyoktah saririnah || ~ "Only the material body of the indestructible, immeasurable and eternal living entity is subject to destruction." ... While the individual soul/Jiva/Atma only transmigrates from one body to another body: Verse 22:|| vāsānsi jīrNāni yathā vihāya navāni grihNāti naro.aparāNi tathā śarīrāNi vihāya jīrNānyanyāni sanyāti navāni dehī || ~"Just as a human being puts on new garments, casting off old and worn-out ones, the individual soul (Jiva/Atma) similarly takes up residence within new material bodies, giving up the old and infirm ones." [The "First Law of Thermodynamics" (Conservation) states that energy is always conserved; it cannot be created or destroyed. In essence, energy can be converted from one form into another: 'Energy can be changed from one form to another, but it cannot be created or destroyed. The total amount of energy and matter in the Universe remains constant, merely changing from one form to another.' ~ The Srimad Bhagavad Geeta in Physics! :)] BG Chapter 2, Verse 20:|| Na jãyate mriyate vã kadãchinnãyam bhootvã bhavitã vã na bhooyahaajo nityaha shãshvato'yam purãno na hanyate hanyamãne shareere|| ~ "The individual soul (Jiva/Atma) never takes birth and never dies at any time nor does it come into being again when the body is created. The individual soul (Jiva/Atma) is birthless, eternal, imperishable and timeless and is never destroyed even when the body/outer coil is destroyed (perishes)." Chapter 10, Verse 23:|| nainaṃ chindanti śastrāṇi nainaṃ dahati pāvakaḥ na cainaṃ kledayantyāpo na śoṣayati mārutaḥ || ~ "Weapons cleave It not, fire burns It not, water wets It not, wind dries It not. This self (Jiva/Atma) cannot be cut, not burnt, nor get wet, nor dried up. It is eternal, all pervading, stable, immovable and ancient. This [self] is said to be un-manifested, unfathomable and unchangeable." Krishna describes (to Arjun) the human soul (the individual soul/ Jiva/Atma) as something that cannot be cut by weapons, cannot be burnt by fire, cannot be drowned in water, cannot be blown by the wind. Chapter 10, Verse 13: || dehino 'smin yatha dehe kaumaram yauvanam jara tatha dehantara-praptir dhiras tatra na muhyati || ~ "As the embodied soul continuously passes, in this body, from childhood to youth to old age, the soul similarly transmigrates from one body to another. A self-realized soul is not bewildered by such a change."

And thus, 'Karm Yog' is important. 'Karm' or 'Karma' is not punishment, but an opportunity to redeem oneself. (Good/positive) karm is essential to get rid of (bad/negative) karm. For example: a thorn can be removed only with the aid of a bigger thorn. Hence, in order to get rid of Prarabda (negative, destructive) Karm - whether done by us or by others - we have to perform good deeds (Sat Karm) in copious quantities. ... And as we go on doing/performing good deeds indefinitely/continuously, sakama (selfish, benefit-seeking) karm gets transformed into Nishkam (selfless) Karm. In this way, one (i.e. the performer or the Sadhaka) becomes a true yogi (a Karm Yogi), a real ascetic/sanyaasi (one who is detached like the lotus... which grows in muddy water and yet remains Nirmal - untouched by it, or perhaps like the hamsah/swan... whose feathers do not get damp despite remaining in contact with water. Krishn is also known as hamsah, the swan. [And *this* should help us understand the concept of 'lotus feet' as well as the concept of Kara-puṣkara or 'lotus-palm'. Do also read paragraph #2 from the top - for better clarity.] Thus, the Sadhaka or performer (of nishkam karm/selfless action or service) becomes a Muni or Jnani (a truly enlightened person) and achieves Moksh/Nirvana (Jeevan Mukta; non-materialistic). ... Therefore, the wheel (cakra, chakra) needs to rotate or turn continuously, for the 'toxin' (negativities/negative aspects) to be absorbed (negated)... and be replaced by 'dharma' (positive aspects/ethics.) [Note: When the mind is withdrawn from the objects and deep reflection sets in, the objective consciousness is 'closed'; Savitarka Samadhi commences. This is Samadhi with reasoning. The mind here is free from worldly thoughts; negative thoughts cannot enter now. The mind is Sattvic. (It can be called Chitta Suddhi.) When the mind is completely absorbed in one object of meditation, it is termed Samadhi. Karm Yog is also a kind of meditation. It destroys the ego or ahankara. And it requires complete self-sacrifice of Nishkam Karm (selfless action/service). Such yogis are Nishkam Karm Yogis. ... And only they can achieve Nirvikalpa Samadhi... to 'awaken' to Moksha (freedom). The state of Nirvikalpa Samadhi leads to Jivanmukta (liberation). In nirvikalpa samadhi there is infinite bliss. (Sat-cit-ānanda, pronounced as: sach-chid-ānanda - one who has achieves eternal bliss of self-realization. Sat describes an essence that is pure and timeless; cit is consciousness; ānanda is absolute bliss or spiritual ecstasy.) One not only feels bliss, but also actually grows into that bliss. When one enters into nirvikalpa samadhi, one's heart is larger than the universe itself. One 'sees' the universe as a tiny dot inside one's vast heart. (Aham Brahmasmi.) Imagine that you are a crystal bead. You reflect the light of every being in the universe, and your light is reflected in them. "Aham Brahmasmi" ~ continue to envision yourself as a beautiful jewel, reflecting and absorbing the light of the entire universe. Rest in the silence and feel the expansiveness of your being... an expression of the infinite field of intelligence and all possibilities. Becoming one with the soul is possible only in the Nirvikalpa Samadhi state. (Should one hold communion with Brahmn, devoid of mental fancies and modifications, then the great bondage of the mind will cease, all doubts will vanish, all pratibandha or vighna will disappear, and all (negative) Karmas will perish.) One gains Realization of God and the Self... only after attaining the stage of Nirvikalpa Samadh. (Jiva is/becomes identical with Brahmn/Param-aatma/Atman.) Self-realization is to fully know and realize who you are. Before knowing God (Brahmn), know yourself, if you understand yourself... only then is it possible to understand God, Nature or Love. With the realization of the Atman (Supersoul, Param-aatma) come universal compassion, love, and the awareness of the oneness of all things (higher knowledge). ("Sarvam khalvidam brahma ~ All is Brahmn. There is nothing but Brahmn.") This brings Ananda (inner joy or peace). Aham Brahmasmi (ah-HUM brah-MAHS-mee) ~ Brhadaranyaka Upanishad, 1.4.10 (of the Yajur Veda.) ~ (Aham = I, Brahmasmi = am Brahmn. Meaning: I Am He/Brahmn.) (Fill the mind with Atman/Supersoul. Then the mind becomes identified with Brahmn. As you think, so you become. Think you are Brahmn; Brahmn you will become. ~ Your entire being, your karm, your thoughts... will reflect that.) Other Mahavakyas ("The Great Sayings" of the Upanishads - the foundational texts of Vedanta; though there are many Mahavakyas, four of them, one from each of the four Vedas, are often mentioned as "the Mahavakyas"): ·prajñānam brahma: "Consciousness is Brahmn" (Aitareya Upanishad 3.3 of the Rig Veda) · ayam ātmā brahma: "This Self is Brahmn" (Mandukya Upanishad 1.2 of the Atharva Veda) · tat tvam asi: "Thou art That" (Chandogya Upanishad 6.8.7 of the Sama Veda.) || (Aum) Asato mā sad gamaya Tamaso mā jyotir gamaya Mrtyormā amrtam gamaya Aum śānti śānti śāntih || ~ (Brhadāranyaka Upanisad 1.3.28) ~ "(Aum) From ignorance, lead me unto truth (dharma, ethics, actions that benefit society) | From darkness (the 'fog' of ignorance, delusion, 'sleep', and other negative aspects), lead me unto light (knowledge, hope, wisdom, enlightenment) | From death, lead me unto immortality | Aum let there be peace within ourselves, let there be peace in the world, let there be peace in the universe." (Aum, also known as Om: The syllable Om - written out as Aum with each letter having its own significance - represents Brahmn, the supreme creator, as well as the whole of creation. It is also the primeval sound (Pranava Naad), the sound of the universe itself. The uttering of the sacred and mystical Om is called Onkar or Omkar. It is the sound of the origination and dissolution of the universe. The past, present, future and all that transcends time are all included in this sound. Lord Narayan is the personification/manifestation of Om or Aum.)]

The Srimad Bhagavad Geeta (roughly: 'The Song of the Blessed One' or 'The Song of the Fortunate One'; Srimad is honorific; Geeta = Geet, Song; Bhagavat (a manifestation of the all-embracing God) = [roughly] maha-avatar) contains tremendous and cosmogonal philosophy in comparison with which our modern world and its literature seem puny and trivial; so remote is its sublimity from our conceptions (~ to partially quote Henry David Thoreau). [When I read the Bhagavad-Gita and reflect about how God created this universe everything else seems so superfluous. ~ Albert Einstein. In order to approach a creation as sublime as the Bhagavad-Gita with full understanding it is necessary to attune our soul to it. ~ Rudolph Steiner.] The verses can also be taken as a conversation between a Jiva/Atma or individual soul (represented by Arjun) and the Param-aatma/Supersoul (Sri Krishn). [Blessed = highly favoured or fortunate (by divine grace); worthy of worship or veneration; worthy of deep reverence or respect.] Lord Narayan (Shri Hari Vishnu/Satya-Sundar) is "ArdhaNarishvar". He does not discriminate based on gender, etc. Instead, He symbolizes (in a generic sense, in a manner of speaking, that is) "Perfect Man" (Complete Man) and "Perfect Woman" ~ the best (traits, qualities) of man and of woman. His avatars reflect this: some are male, others are female. Therefore, He can be variously addressed as: Ishvar or Ishvari; Adi Purush or Adi Parashakti ['Purusha' and 'Shakti' = Cosmic Energy. Adi = primal, primeval, primordial]; Narayan or Narayani; Nrsingh or Nrsinghi, Varaha or Varahi, Parameshvar or Parameshvari; Jagadishvar or Jagadishvari, tribhUvaneshvar or tribhUvaneshvari, and so on - broadly speaking. Though, in all probability, His female avatars have to wade through and surmount greater odds and all sorts of barriers... on account of their gender, etc... given the 'societal churn', stereotyping, prejudice, obscurantism and negative and regressive attitudes (that they [periodically] arrive to alter.) Not to speak of chauvinism, misogyny, small-mindedness, vilification, contempt, discrimination, maybe even jealousy (and all the taunt, vitriol, resentment, and scorn arising out of envy... and maybe even some amount of objectification, who can say?) ~ the intensity of which depends on the era/yug. *However, the avatars' appeal is universal. (But now that language, culture and geography has evolved; newer concepts like "religion" - what we today understand by "religion", that is - has come about ~ in the last couple of millenniums or so; whether, going forward, the Almighty [and His many avatars] will abide by such man-made barriers and concepts or not ~ my guess is as good as yours.) ["ArdhaNarishvar" is a concept, a philosophy, it is not literal; it does not mean "half-man half-woman", and it does not mean 'tritiya prakriti' either. Besides, symbolically representing "Perfect Man" (Complete Man) and "Perfect Woman" (Complete Woman) ~ the best (traits, qualities) of man and of woman, it also emphasizes that both are equal. And that, imbalance will not help, one cannot do (is incomplete) without the other; therefore, one half of the 'body' is depicted as male, while the other half is depicted as female). Imbalance will result in humanity and civilization to stagnate, regress and wither away.Also, the soul (whether Jiva/Atma - the individual soul or Atman - the Supersoul) is energy; and energy has no gender or form.] ... The 8th Vishnu, the Krishna-avatar ~ is (the human manifestation of) "Perfect Man" (Complete Man). [He is neither overtly aggressive nor displays machismo. His appeal was and remains universal. He is 'hamsan' (do read the fourth paragraph from the last - to get the drift). And he is the most magnificent householder (he was non-monastic; he did not renounce "home life".) ~ He is "Perfect Man" (Complete Man) - not because of his gender, but on the strength of his 'karm': his commitment, fortitude, gumption, passion, talent, courage, dynamism (his energy and strong desire to make certain things [positive change/aspects] happen), charisma, far-sightedness, erudition, philosophy, magnanimity, wisdom, astuteness, nishkam/selfless acts, intellectual acuity, alchemist nature and ability to inspire... all of which confluenced and contributed towards epoch-making karm. He was also a chivalrous "knight" (rather, a "Super-smart Knight"). Was he equine-faced? ~ We can only speculate. However, which of His avatars represent "Perfect Woman" ~ my guess is as good as yours.]  

[*It is because of these inspirational female avatars that generation of people (those who are part of Sanaatan Dharm or even what is today known as "Hinduism") ~ have been relatively free from troglodytism, vis-à-vis women. Being accustomed to watching programs, listening to and reading (from an early age) ~ stories and anecdotes of their exploits and keerti (great and awe-inspiring deeds), besides watching/observing female deities being prayed to, worshipped and revered... by a large number of people (irrespective of gender and age) ~ have made it easier (for all manner of people, especially the vast multitude... who are not quite educated or even literate) ~ to, at least, accept women in various leadership and strategic and tactical roles; to see women step out of their homes and go about their business... and not find it unusual. Else, imagine the level of obscurantism and troglodytism... that these would have generated... and (in turn) engulfed Hinduism. (No amount of sermons or even legislation could or would have changed anything.) [Also, mere education is no guarantee for a progressive outlook. Cultural conditioning is much deeper than that. ~ Changing well-entrenched perceptions, mindset, and so on is a truly herculean task.] The female avatars (our female deities) have played myriad roles: as saviours/rescuers; as protectors, preservers, strategists and warriors; as teachers (through their own behaviour/acharan, or by sharing their thoughts and vision with humanity at large); as bestowers of knowledge, wisdom, enlightenment, wealth, well-being, prosperity and happiness, and even as diplomat (the *Mohini-avatar; though her story has largely been misinterpreted. Krishn, a male, is also known as "Mohan". Therefore, "Mohini" is simply the feminine of "Mohan"... and indicates a female.) On a separate note, it is unlikely that any of the female avatars would have actually worn a saree (just as it is unlikely that any of the male avatars actually wore a dhoti.) This bit is, therefore, a result of contemporization ~ so that people, especially the vast multitude, can relate to and thus, establish a connect. Else... the deities would appear to be strangers, even alien/foreign. Besides, there have been various reform movements, apart from numerous plays, dance-dramas, literature, verses, songs/bhajans, hymns, mantra-s, stuti-s, shloka-s, stotra-s, picture books, paintings, art, iconography... and so on. And all these have allowed people to watch/see as well as to hear/listen and read ~ continuously (over generations)... and thus, many positive things/aspects vis-à-vis women have percolated. Hinduism is much the richer for it. Else, given our size, diversity and very complex demographics, one can well imagine how hard it would have been and how challenging it would have been... to undo epic levels of troglodytism ~ in case it were to engulf Hinduism. That it hasn't, and we have managed to remain relatively progressive... is courtesy the inspirational female avatars (and deities) ~ besides Lord Narayan, of course. However, the female avatars are larger-than-life and karm yogi-s, but not unreal; they are all very much human and relatable... and therein lay their appeal, across eras/yugs and generations. Also, (now-a-days) ~ we get to see relatively hands-on fathers: strolling or shopping with his sound asleep or wide awake baby ~ safely ensconced in a baby carrier, pushing prams, indulging in baby talk, trying to calm his wailing baby, minding the kids, playing with them, and so on. ... And the concept of 'paternity leave' is trickling in.] 

*Let's discuss the Mohini-avatar: The aasuric (malevolent) entities (residing in the Adho-Loka/the Lower Planets) indulged in negative activities/adharm ~ after attacking and occupying the higher Planets/the Urdhva-Loka, also known as Svarga-loka, Deva-loka. They also forcibly gained control over certain resources (euphemistically referred to as 'amrit')... that did not belong to them. This helped them to increase their influence and power tremendously. Result: "samudra-manthan"... and huge imbalance. At such a time, Lord Narayan (Shri Hari/Vishnu/Satya-Sundar/Virupaksha/Pundarikaksha) ~ as the Mohini-avatar ~ acquires the (metaphoric) pot of 'amrit' from the thieving 'Asuras' (malevolent entities) ~ via diplomacy, and returns it to the Devas (positive entities); thus helping them to regain their position/pre-eminence (euphemistically referred to as: immortality.) And so, the machinations of the malevolent/negative entities came to a naught. [This could well be an allegorical tale, applicable to all eras.] Lord Narayan incarnates (to help mankind/humanity) face the challenges posed... whenever negative forces become too dominant. In reality, though, there is no such thing as 'amrit' - celestial or otherwise. "Amaratva" (eternal life) can be achieved only through one's karm, 'coz one's keerti (great deeds) lives on forever. Thus, a mere mortal/human can triumph death (which is inevitable)... and become 'mritunjay' (immortal). [Narayan = benefactor of humanity (nara). HA= sky; RA= fire; I= energy; HARI = effulgent omnipresent omnipotent omniconscient cosmic energy. Hari also means: green, Lord Narayan is also the Lord of Nature. He is "Kshiteeshah": The Lord of the earth. Virupaksha = one with oblique eyes. Pundarikaksha = 'lotus-eyed' (i.e. one whose eyes are shaped like lotus petals). Lord Krishn is also puṣkara-locanaḥ, puṣkara-akṣaḥ, puṣkara-īkṣaṇah ~ 'lotus-eyed' and vishalaksha ~ 'big-eyed'. In His "Vishwaroop" ~ His Universal form, Lord Narayan incorporates everything that is a part of the entire universe/cosmos, whether seen or unseen, animate or inanimate, tangible or intangible. The universes are therefore His 'body'. And, He is also the motive power and guiding spirit behind the mathematically precise universes.] Let's turn to the 'Rahu-Ketu' story. 'Mohini's Sudarshan Chakra cut off Rahu's head': Perhaps, the Mohini-avatar was responsible for Prthvi-loka getting a satellite of her own... as can be inferred from the 'Rahu-Ketu' stories. (Rahu's head remained while the body was destroyed - thanks to Mohini's Sudarshan Chakra.) Here: 'Sudarshan Chakra' is a metaphor for an instrument/technology. (Do also refer to paragraph # 18 ~ from the top, to know what 'sudarshan chakra' otherwise means/indicates.) Lord Narayan, as the Mohini-avatar, would have destroyed the 'body' (possibly: a giant asteroid) while keeping the 'head' (very likely: a small moon... accompanying the 'body'/giant asteroid) ~ intact. Result: a global catastrophe (if it were to strike Prthvi-loka/Earth, that is) was averted, while the newly acquired satellite began circumnavigating Prthvi-loka. (Rahu: probably is a reference for an asteroid-moon duo: a giant-sized asteroid with own small satellite in tow; i.e. a giant-sized asteroid dragging its moon along. Such a huge flying object is known as a binary asteroid, and is circled by a satellite, or moon. Giant-sized, hence the word 'Asura' has been used. [Asura = giant-sized. Here: 'Asura' is not a reference for any people or clan, or even malevolent entities.] Pieces of the destroyed asteroid probably fell on the moon. Ketu (probably) is a reference for Prthvi-loka/Earth. Hence it has been said: The body also turned into Ketu due to a boon, and it in turn swallows the moon on timely basis to cause a lunar eclipse. ... And (as we know) ~ a lunar eclipse occurs when the Earth's shadow falls on the Moon! It's a small wonder then that this story is part of the "samudra-manthan" stories - the story of the churning of the Kshirasagar/Ocean of Milk/Akash Ganga (Milky Way) and/or the Andromeda (... and that is how our solar system emerged/came about). In short: "samudra-manthan" is essentially the story of creation. ['Deva' could indicate positive force/energy/charge (anode), while 'Asura' could indicate negative force/energy/charge (cathode). Their interplay gives rise to creation/Shrishti (the Material Universe/Prakriti/Nature, as well as the planets, habitability on planets [land, mountains], et al.) 'Mohini-avatar' represents a stabilizing force and/or the catalyst.] However, since samudra-manthan (as a metaphor) can also have wide usage/application, various narratives have confluenced and even fused into one, courtesy later-day translators, interpreters, et al.]


Robi Thakur rightly said: "gaaner bheetor diye jakhon dekhi bhuban-khani, takhon tarey chini."He acknowledged (as only he could) that he has realized Him through his songs. That he has understood the Eternal Enigma and His endless cosmic mysteries... through music. Do listen to Eso Shyamolo Sundaro: Robindroshongeet - based on raaga Desh, and rendered by the effervescent-versatile-spellbinding Asha Bhonsle:


 




Pic: an illustration of Kurma-avatar (2nd avatar of the Dasavatara): Sri Vishnu incarnated as a giant turtle (kurma) to save the earth from destruction. He acted as a base to support Mount Mandar (Meru) - with Vasuki wrapped around it - that was used as an axis for churning the ocean (kshira-sagar/ocean of milk - white foamy waters?). ~ What does 'Vishnu as the Kurma-avatar held up Mt. Meru on his back' mean? BG 10.23:|| meruh sikharinam aham || ~ and of mountains I am Meru." ~ Is Mt. Meru a real mountain or an allegorical one? From what we can gather, it is not a physical 'mountain'. *And, is there some connection between Mt. Meru (situated in the center of the earth) and Shambhala? Or with Jambudvipa? [But then, what areas constituted "Jambudvipa"? ~ 'Coz it is unlikely that the contours of modern India constituted ancient "Jambudvipa". ~ Just as Lord Ram's empire or Raja Yayati's empire were not confined to the landmass that makes up modern India.] Mt. Meru is also believed to be the center of the cosmos. ~ So does Mt. Meru have something to do with the cosmic architecture of the Material Universe (Material Nature/Prakriti)... that could trigger "Pralaya" (cataclysmic events) or even worse? ... Shambhu Nath (Ruler/Protector/Guardian of Shambhala) and the (allegorical) Kurma Avatar - are they one and the same? ~ My guess is as good as yours. *The Hindu and Buddhist alike regard Mount Meru as the location of (the fabled land of) Shambhala. (Meru is said to be situated in the center of the earth.) It is the center of the cosmos. Its summit is believed to align to the wheeling constellation of Ursa Major (the Sapta Rishi Mandala or the Constellation of the Great Bear/sapta-riksha), the Seven Stars that circle the Pole (Dhruva Loka?) Therefore,Mt Meru and the fabled Buddhist land of Shambhala are one and the same. ~ Maybe, Mt Meru is another name for Shambhala. However, are Mt Meru and Mandar Parvat one and the same? Or is Mandar Parvat a part of Mt Meru? ~ My guess is as good as yours. But then, since Mt Meru is not a physical 'mountain' (and so, is not visible to the mortal/unaided eye), Mandar Parvat (whether another name for Mt Meru or a part of Mt Meru) too cannot be a physical 'mountain'. So, is Shambhala and/or Jambudvipa the first landmass to emerge out of the "samudra-manthan" (?) - the churning of the Kshirasagar/Ocean of Milk (the churning waters on the earth [and/or of Jambunad] - foamy-white in appearance, and thus the metaphor of "Kshira".)~ My guess is as good as yours.[For Shambhala - do read paragraph #8 from the last - in the earlier portion/section. ~ Shambhala is also the place where the 10th Vishnu, the Kalki-avatar - the final avatara of the "Dasavatara" - is predicted to be born. Shambhala is also ruled over by Lord Maitreya (Maitreya Buddha/Buddha Maitreya, the future Buddha, the next Buddha-to-be after Gautama Buddha/Shakyamuni Buddha). ~ So (given that Lord Gautam Buddh is the 9th Vishnu)... is the Kalki-avatar and the Maitreya Buddha one and the same? ~ My guess is as good as yours.For Lord Maitreya- do read paragraph #8 from the last - in the earlier portion/section. 

Pic: An illustration of 'Matsya (fish) Avatar rescues the Saptarishi and Manu from the great Deluge/Mahajal Pralaya'. [However, the Matsya Avatar does not indicate a fish, per se.] ~ Shambhala is also believed to have been the ashram/abode of Vamana. Now, this may not be a reference to the Vamana-avatar (the fifth avatar of the Dasavatara) since the events involving him and Bali did on happen on the Earth. This "Vamana" (probably) is a reference to the seventh and current Manu, Vaivasvata Manu. There are times when the Almighty chooses a great human - as "Manu". This chosen one then becomes one of the "Manu"; he is thereafter referred to as a specific "Manu"... and participates in rescue and rehabilitation activities. The seventh and current Manu, Vāmana as Vaivasvata Manu is one such human "Manu". Born to Saranya and Vivasvat, his original name is Satyavrata. He saved humanity from the (previous) great flood/deluge (Mahajal Pralay) - by building specially-designed ships (nao)... as per the advise of the Matsya-Avatar. [Incidentally, a Sisumara/dolphin also represents the Almighty. ~ And a dolphin is well-known for guiding ships through turbulent waters.] Now whether Vaivasvata Manu is also referred to as "Noah" or not ~ my guess is as good as yours. ~ Also, since Ikshvaku (son of Vaivasvata Manu) is the founder of the Ikshvaku [or Aikṣvāka]dynasty/lineage - to which greats like Sagara, Dilīpa, Bhagiratha, Raghu and Shri Ram belonged... the (previous) great flood/deluge (Mahajal Pralay) could not have happened eons ago. It (very likely) happened sometime during the Sat/Satya/Krita Yug of the current Maha-Yug (cycle of four yug) itself. ~ My guess is as good as yours.]

[Note:This story is part of the "samudra-manthan" stories - the story of the churning of the Kshirasagar/Ocean of 'Milk' - the story of creation (as well as the story of the evolution of the Earth). The Kshirasagar/Ocean of 'Milk' can represent the churning waters on the earth (and/or of Jambunad) - foamy-white in appearance, and thus the metaphor of "Kshira" or Milk; it can also (metaphorically) represent Akash Ganga (Milky Way) and/or the Andromeda (... and [perhaps] that is how our solar system emerged/came about). ~ 'Deva' could indicate positive force/energy/charge (anode), while 'Asura' could indicate negative force/energy/charge (cathode). Their interplay gives rise to creation/Shrishti (the Material Universe/Prakriti/Nature, as well as the planets, habitability on planets [mountains, land], et al.) The 'Mohini-avatar' (can also) represent a stabilizing force and/or a catalyst. (In fact, Lord Narayan - in His various avatars - represents a stabilizing force, one that preserves and protects - for the good of humanity and the earth... when the imbalance [caused by various "churning"] becomes too great.) ~ "Samudra-manthan" (as a metaphor) can also have wide usage/application... and can even include societal churning, and so on. PS:Mount Meru, in Hindu mythology, is a magnificent and sacred mountain that stands in the centre of the universe and is the axis of the world. As the world axis, Mount Meru reaches down below the ground, into the nether regions, as far as it extends into the heavens. Mount Meru, also called Sumeru (Sanskrit) or Mahameru (the Great Meru/Mountain), is a sacred mountain in Hindu, Jain as well as Buddhist cosmology and is considered to be the center of all the physical, metaphysical and spiritual universes. The Suryasiddhanta mentions that Mt Meru lies in 'the middle of the Earth' ("Bhugol-madhya") in the land of the Jambunad (Jambudvip). [Suryasiddhānt, however, mentions a Mt Meru in the middle of Earth, besides a Sumeru and a Kumeru at both the Poles.] Another text mentions "Sumeruḥ Prithvī-madhye shrūyate drishyate na tu" ('Su-meru is heard to be in the middle of the Earth, but is not seen there'). ~ So, probably, Mt Meru cannot be seen with mortal/unaided eyes/it is not a physical 'mountain'. Mount Meru of Hindu traditions (has allegorical aspects, and) is described as 84,000 Yojan high (which is around 1,082,000 km (672,000 mi), or 85 times the Earth's diameter), and having the Sun along with all its planets in the Solar System revolve around it as one unit (~ this could also be allegorical, to indicate the importance of Mount Meru). [One Yojana can be taken to mean about 11.5 km (9 mi) though its magnitude seems to differ over time periods.] According to Jainism, Mount Meru is at the center of the middle world. The continent, known as Jambu Dwipā, surrounds it in the form of a circle and its diameter is 1,00,000 Yojāns. A ring formed ocean surrounds the Jambu Dwipā. It is an ocean of the salt (Lavanoda) and in its diameter is 2,00,000 Yojāns.] 

Pic:an illustration of the Vamana-avatar (the dwarf-avatar of Lord Narayan, the fifth avatar of the Dasavatara): Was the beautiful continent of Africa (and perhaps even Australia) attached to the Indian subcontinent - someway or the other? Otherwise, how come some islands flanking the Indian sub-continent have humans that are very different in appearance, etc? How did these islands come about? ~ However, the actual event involving the fifth avatar (the Vamana or dwarf-avatar) did not happen on Earth. It happened elsewhere in the cosmos - in one of the Lower Realms/Adho-Lokas (and involved Maharaj Bali - the ruler of Sutala, one of the Lower planets). [After Bali, an otherwise just and able king/administrator, succumbed to arrogance and ego (that caused him to indulge in acts that brought grief/unhappiness to his people), the Lord Himself dispelled it. [The Almighty is not merely the Cosmic Ruler, He is also the Cosmic Teacher.] Thereafter, Bali realized his folly/error (arising out of his arrogance/hubris) and pledged to make amends. The Lord then sent him to Pataala - the lowest of the Adho-Lokas/Lower Realms (not to be confused for the Hellish Planets/Narak-Loka) to "wash off" his prarabda karma (bad/negative karma). It is unlikely though that Bali would have retained his position of king/administrator in Pataala, but he diligently performed his karm to "wash off" his prarabda karma. ~ At the end of it, the Almighty addressed him as Maha Bali (the Great Bali) and blessed him to be Indra (ruler of Svarga-Loka) of the next Manvantara. [Do refer to the Vishwa-roop or Viraat-Roop in the earlier part of the post - to get the drift.] As we can see, the Almighty values competency and ethics. ... However, the allegorical version of this story - can it be applicable to Earth? Did a celestial event (a meteorite strike, etc), or (perhaps) a major earthquake (or a combination of both?)... cause a big chunk of the landmass to sink below the waters? ... And did this result in the continent/landmass of what is now Africa (or a part of the African continent, at least) to gradually drift away (from the Indian sub-continent) and get attached to some other landmass? ... And was this also the reason for what is now the continent of Australia (and maybe even New Zealand) to (also) gradually drift away from the Indian sub-continent? ... And was this also the reason for a part of the current Indian landmass to get attached to another half of the Indian landmass - thus giving rise to various mountains, as well as the current geography, etc? ~ My guess is as good as yours. Also, were these small-sized humans (vamana humans, such as the Bushmen, the Yaksha, the Jarawa, the Sentinelese, the Great Andamanese, the Onge, the Australian aborigines, et al) - the earliest humans that evolved on earth from animal-like ancestors - as is (also) depicted/indicated by the fifth avatar of the Dasavatara - the Vamana-avatar? ~ My guess is as good as yours. [Do also read the next paragraph.]

Pic: Illustration - Dasavatara. ~ Maharshi Vashisht (one of the Sapta-Rishi and the chief preceptor or the royal guru to the Suryavanshi Ikshvaku [or Aikṣvāka] lineage in which Lord Ram appeared) shared with Shri Ram what was told to him by Sage Bhushunda. ~ That: in the beginning there was nothing; the Earth was extremely hot and covered by lava for thousands of years (11,000 years to be precise; however, this could be Human years [in which case it would be 11,000 years per se], or it could be Deva years [in which case, it would be much more than 11,000 years]. 1 human year = 1 Deva Ahoratra for God (1 day and 1 night) ... And that "Daityas" and "Danavas" (indicating 'gigantic creatures', possibly various dinosaurs) roamed the Earth. [As we can see meanings and nomenclature changes with time. "Daityas" and "Danavas" meant 'gigantic creatures'/wild animals at one time, while in another era/yug they were the names of Asura sub-clans.] ... Then, gradually, everything was covered by ice. It was extremely cold. There was no life. Slowly the ice melted. | ~ Therefore, (i.e. after a reasonable amount of the ice had melted)... did "samudra manthan" commence? ~ My guess is as good as yours. ~ Is Shambhala and/or Jambudvipa the first landmass to emerge out of the "samudra-manthan" (?) - the churning of the Kshirasagar/Ocean of 'Milk' (the churning waters on the earth [and/or of Jambunad] - foamy-white in appearance, and thus the metaphor of "Kshira" or Milk.) ~ My guess is as good as yours. And, once the turbulence/"churning" subsided (to a reasonable extent, at least) did the higher beings introduce 'life' on earth - in the form of various micro-organisms; which were then (gradually) followed by (the earliest) algae, plankton, fungi, snails, slugs, et al? And finally (the earliest) fish (matsya)... an indicator that life on the waters was flourishing, and so, the conditions were suitable for the appearance of land (landmass or sandy stretches) on Earth? ~ And that the Earth (landmass or sandy areas on Earth, that is) was now ready to host 'higher' creatures/living beings? ~ And therefore, was this followed by the introduction of (the earliest) amphibians (as is also depicted/indicated by the kurma or tortoise-avatar)? This (probably) was followed by (the earliest) ferns, and other smaller plants, shrubs... and finally trees?  Thereafter, came (the earliest) animals and birds - as is also depicted/indicated by the third avatar - the Varaha-avatar (which, due to its strong and sharp teeth, would have been able to sort of (in a manner of speaking, that is) till the land/sandy stretches, (thus) paving the way for plants/trees, etc to grow well, besides creating suitable conditions for pollination to happen?) ~ My guess is as good as yours. ... And, once all of these acclimatized on Earth, did the higher beings (gradually) introduce various animal-like ancestors of the earliest humans/adivasis (as is also depicted/indicated by the fourth avatar - the Nrsingh-avatar) on Earth? ~ 'Coz Sanaatan Dharma does not talk about the human species emerging or evolving out of great apes. The extinct civilizations/groups/people also do not say so; besides, a huge/gigantic serpent features in many extinct cultures/groups. ~ However, it is quite possible that the first group of humans (vamana or small-sized humans + what is today understood as 'Mongoloid' tribes) evolved on Earth... from various animal-like ancestors; not 'animal' per se, but 'animal-like' - (progenitors of the earliest humans, but sort of 'resembling' ape-man, bear and even lion-like in (facial) appearance) - given the shape of their skull, jawline or teeth, or for that matter their dietary habits, gait, hirsuteness, eye-sight, verbal sounds, et al. ~ One possibility is that: this helped to determine the habitability of the Earth for future versions of humans - the ones that did not evolve on this planet (as is also depicted/indicated by the sixth avatar, the Parasurama-avatar). By the time the latter groups arrived (in batches - from other lokas/planets, maybe from other planets that are part of the Madhya Lokas/Middle planets - to which even our Earth belongs), the former groups would have evolved and become more human-like (gradually though, ever since they discovered fire and learned to cook raw meat, etc), albeit with a distinct culture, language, way of life, etc. And so, to the newer versions of humans, the former were, thus, known as "adi-vasi": adi = most ancient, original or earliest known, vasi = dwellers. [With the arrival of the new groups of humans, settlements came about, language and means of communication changed, dietary habits changed... and so on; thus, the evolution of society or a new 'way of life' took shape. Pastoral and agricultural activities (as denoted/indicated by the Balarama-avatar holding a plough) and other socio-economic functions came about. Barter system evolved, and so on.] But then, various groups of humans eventually intermixed... giving rise to newer groups/sub-species, languages, culture, cuisine, and so on.) ~ BG 10.6: || maharsayah sapta purve catvaro manavas tatha mad-bhava manasa jata yesham loka imah prajah || ~ "The seven great sages/enlightened beings (the Sapta-Rishi) and before them the four other great sages/enlightened beings (Sanaka, Sanandan, Sanatana and Sanat, collectively known as the four Kumaras or Sanat Kumaras) and the Manu-s (entities that arrive... during times of great calamity, distress and turbulence - pralaya- to guide and resettle mankind/humanity), come from Me, born from My mind (manasa, manasa-jata/brain-child), and all the living beings populating the various planets (loka) descend from them." ~ [Now, could this mean that the Sapta-Rishi (the seven enlightened beings/sages - not to be confused for 'ascetics') and the Manu-s are responsible (tasked with) introducing life on Earth... starting from the earliest micro-organism to the latest humans? ~ My guess is as good as yours.] ... The seven-rishis/enlightened beings (their combination differs according to different "Manvantara"/with each "Manavantara" overseen by one of the 14 Manu. Manvantara = Manav [human/human species; from "Manu" comes 'manushya' or 'manav'] + Antara [time gap]) are the most advanced spiritual guides for Humanity and have been present at all major time periods of our ancient history (pracheen itihasa). They undertook research, euphemistically known as 'yagna', etc. and shared their knowledge with deserving disciples. They were also preceptors or guru of prominent royal lineages ~ and besides conducting research, treating ailments, undertaking surgical procedures and imparting knowledge/education, they also provided advice and guidance. Probably they were also the ones who taught the Sanskrit language to humanity (especially to the humans of Jambudvipa). [It is unlikely though that there ever was a single language or even a single version of the Sanskrit language. (~ No language is monolithic.) Also, humans, whether they evolved on Earth (i.e. various adivasi groups) or arrived from other lokas/planets... would have, in all likelihood, come up with (i.e. developed) their own language and system of communication (in the case of the adivasi groups) or brought along their own language(s) and ways of communication with them (in the case of the later humans).] These sapta rishis (enlightened/learned beings) were not only men of great wisdom and knowledge, but also masters of Science, including advanced medical science, biotechnology and quantum physics. [~ And, this should also explain how Shri Ram and his siblings were born - via very advanced IVF procedure/therapy - where (perhaps) nothing was injected into the body, instead, it could be ingested! Clearly: 'modern science' is (as yet) unaware of such advanced medical science, which was known to our ancients in the second era or the Treta Yug itself - courtesy the Sapta-rishis. ~ Sri Ram and his siblings were (thus) the first set of unnatural humans on Earth: i.e. humans whose gestation happened in human womb but who were not conceived naturally. ... However, due to their noble nature and positive/great deeds - which benefited society and humanity - Sri Ram and his siblings were hailed. Thus, these humans (born out of very advanced IVF therapy) were accepted by society and humanity at large - in Treta. And this would have (also) benefited childless couples. ... The Lord Himself arrived - as (an IVF baby) - the 'Ram-avatar' (the 7th Vishnu) - to integrate the first set of unnatural humans (born as a result of scientific procedure/assistance: very advanced IVF procedure/therapy), as well as various adivasi groups (e.g. Hanuman-ji, Surgeeva, Angad, Jambavan, et al were adivasi) and other marginalized groups (such as the 'tritiya-prakriti') with the rest of society. [In fact, he proved that the adivasi-s and 'tritiya-prakriti' were not sub-humans, but full-fledged humans, albeit with a distinct 'way of life'. Thus, Treta accepted them as full-fledged humans. ~ Shri Ram and Shri Krishn belonged to different eras/yugs... and their purpose, karm and challenges were also different. However, like Shri Krishn, Shri Ram too led from the front, and by example; he established/reinvigorated dharma... leading to a just and inclusive society.*] ~ However, as the 8th Vishnu (the Krishn-avatar) - the Lord arrived (yet again)... to eliminate the other set of unnatural humans (cross between humans on Earth and other much Higher and advanced Beings) - born via highly advanced genetic engineering and cloning technology. ~ Thus, while Treta accepted humans born out of advanced IVF therapy/procedure, Dvapar rejected unnatural humans born out of advanced genetic engineering and cloning technology. ~ The Lord Himself arrived to make this happen.] ~ The Sapta-Rishi are (very likely) one notch higher than the Humans. They pursue the path of knowledge, innovation and research, rather they are dedicated to it; that is their intrinsic nature (pravritti) or talent (guna)... and hence they are "Brahmana", not to be confused for "Brahmin". (Their appearance and depiction is courtesy the imagination of various persons of later eras, and so, cannot be taken literally.)] As to how various extinct (or lost) flora and fauna make their re-appearance ~ my guess is as good as yours. [PS: The "Dasavatara has many strands.]

Pic: Illustration of Kumbhakarna, though 'he' was not Raavan's younger "brother", but a gigantic humanoid-robot equipped with a variety of weaponry.[*Note:Shri Ram's actions not only helped build a better society but also gave him the required gravitas... once he ascended the throne; he (probably) deferred the coronation - to bring about positive societal change, Kaikeyi and Manthara aided him. (The trusted Manthara was needed, since Kaikeyi - being a queen - would not have been able to do everything by herself; also, there is a possibility that Shri Ram maintained contacts with Kaikeyi - to keep himself up-to-date regarding the goings-on, etc.) His 14-years-long exile was (very likely) a voluntary one; in his absence, (Kaikeyi's son) Bharat - younger to Ram but older than (Sumitra's twins) Lakshman and Shatrughna - was an acceptable alternative. (However, he may not have acquiesced on his own.) Raja Dasarath was suffering from an assortment of old age-related ailments, and was (thus) keen to arrange the coronation. Shri Ram, however, (probably) wanted to defer it, 'coz as Raja Dasarath's son he would not have had the required gravitas (to bring about social reform, to change perceptions, mindset, and so on); besides, kingly duties, customs et al would have straitjacketed him. ~ He is hailed as "Maryada Purushottam" - since he overcame numerous obstacles/impediments... and successfully brought about positive societal change (by changing negative perceptions and, thereby, undoing numerous social ills that masqueraded as 'accepted societal norms' or 'maryada'). Shri Ram's actions resulted in a just, prosperous and inclusive society (euphemistically known as 'Ram Rajya'). ~ However, (perhaps) for the purposes of stage plays, folk theatre, poetry et al (that more often than not reflect the sign of the times) and due to mistranslations and even improvisation (due to a lack of understanding of scientific terminology, technological aspects and the like - by a succession of later translators)... the 'pracheen itihasa' known as "Ramayana" has taken several detours. ~ My guess is as good as yours. Also, there is a strong possibility that (Raavan's consort/queen) Mandodari was Sita's real mother; apparently, both were so alike that even Hanuman was confused. (Sheeradhwaj, title Raja 'Janak', was Sita's foster father, hence Sita is also known as Janki.) Jatayu was not a bird but a human belonging to the Shakuna clan (a group/clan that displayed a vulture-totem or insignia, or maybe a bald eagle totem/insignia). Therefore, Raavan could not have slashed his wings. Also, Sita could not have (lamented, cried and shouted for help theatrically - up in the air, who would listen?), then thrown down her jewelry from an aircraft (vimana); none can open windows of a vimana up in the sky, the aircraft would crash. The same is applicable w.r.t Ravana's (supposed) slashing of Jatayu's wings while the aircraft (his Pushpak Vimana) is up in the sky. ~ My guess is as good as yours. Plus, Raavan (unlike Duryodhan or Jarasandh) may not have been evil or a tyrant; maybe he was collaborating (at least to some extent) with Shri Ram - to assist the latter in his endeavours (given that his queen/consort Mandodari was very likely Sita's real mother). He also especially deputed Vibhishana's wife, Sarama, to look after Sita during the latter's period of "captivity" at Ashoka-Vatika. However, his son - Meghnaad (Indrajeet) - was overweeningly ambitious, and (probably) misled him. Also, Raavan's quest for personal fame and glory too probably played a role. Besides, ego and anger were his major weaknesses (character and temperament flaws). [However, even after his ego had got the better of him, and despite all that Meghnaad was up to, it was none other than Vibhishana - who by then had come over to Ram's side - and who assured Ram... that Ravana will never let any harm come to Sita. (In fact, even after Vibhishana joining forces with Ram, his wife, Sarama, continued to stay in Lanka, and continued to look after Sita; Ravana never harmed or harassed her.) And this is not surprising. ~ It was a different era, when Arya-Dharma prevailed; Treta was regarded as the "Silver Age" - the Aryans followed certain ethics/tenets even when they fought wars. They never harmed the womenfolk, rather it was unthinkable for an Arya man to take revenge on even his staunchest rival... via the latter's womenfolk. It would not only have been most un-Aryan-like (ignoble), but would also have been considered as the heights of shame and cowardice. (~ Such behaviour was befitting Yavanas and Mlechchas. In fact, Alexander was considered as Yavana: people who were reasonably cultured, knowledgeable, great builders and architects, but who also indulged in certain un-Aryan-like activities.) ... Misbehaviour, abuse or violence against women (including raising one's hand on women) was considered as the lowest of the lowest of 'paap' (sin) that anyone could ever commit; even criminals considered it to be the lowest sin (paap) that would condemn them eternally (to the most despicable/lowliest place of all [possibly the lowest of the Narak-Lokas], a place where killers of women are condemned to, a place that even death-row criminals looked down upon). ~ A shocked Hanuman-ji said as much to Meghnaad... when the latter beat and beheaded a lifelike humanoid of Sita on the battlefield... in a bid to break the morale of the Van-nar Sena.] The same principle is applicable to the Lakshman-Surpanakha story; it too is (very likely) a later addition. 'Lakshman Rekha' is courtesy Tulsidas and his Ramcharitmanas. [Tulsidas was also instrumental in starting the folk event/folk theatre (village costume drama) known as Ram-lila.] ~ The Ramayan has over 3,000 re-telling and/or versions, not to mention the numerous poems and colloquial sayings based on it. [Each era/yug is distinct. Viewing them through the prism of another will be misleading. 'Coz Sat/Satya/Krita Yug is 'Golden Age'; Treta is 'Silver Age'; Dvapar is 'Copper Age' and Kaliyug is 'Iron Age'; at the end of Kaliyug the bud (kali) withers away - and thus, the 'Iron Age' (negative aspects) of kaliyug is at its peak; it is then ghor Kaliyug. This period is considered as the most degenerate/degraded of all ages/yugs.] ~ Indrajeet/Meghnaad resorting to 'illusion' indicates the usage of various technologies, which the later translators were unable to figure out. Also, Meghnaad may have been a name that Ravan's son (eventually) came to be identified with. [Megh = cloud; Naad = sound, roar.] So, it could be due to his abilities as a pilot. Or it could be that his vimana/aircraft broke the sound barrier (thus, Meghnaad). As for Meghnaad 'hiding behind a cloud' - perhaps, his vimana left a trail of smoke that also acted as a camouflage. ~ Kumbhakarna was not Raavan's younger "brother", but a gigantic humanoid-robot equipped with a variety of weaponry. [Possibly, a humanoid version of a much-advanced version of 'The Black Knight Unmanned Combat Vehicle' + 'MAARS Robot' (Modular Advanced Armed Robotic System.) Kumbhakarna's 'mace' or 'spike' or 'hammer' may have been: a 30mm cannon, AA12 Atchisson Assault Shotgun, PHASR Rifle, MB240 machine gun, 40mm grenade launcher, a loudspeaker and eye dazzling laser, or bean bag guns, smoke, and pepper spray... and much more. Also it was probably capable of much 'smarter', potentially more sinister 'tricks'... and inflicted enormous damage in the battlefield.] ~ Maybe our ancients called such a humanoid-robot (Yantra), 'brahma-daitya' or 'brhma-daitya'. Brhma comes from 'Brh', which means: to grow. Daitya = in this case: gigantic-sized. And this (probably) got mistranslated to 'a brāhmaṇa ghost' or 'the ghosts of brahmans, living in the fig trees, the pipal (ficus religiosa), or the banyan (ficus indica), awaiting liberation (mukti) or reincarnation'. ~ Vibhishana was a staunch ally of Shri Ram, though for several years now we have been burning his effigies with gusto! ~ My guess is as good as yours.

Pic:Illustration - Shri Ram 'breaking the Shiva-dhanush', i.e. dismantling the "Shiva-dhanush" or Pinaka - euphemism for the most destructive nuclear weapons - after an all-round agreement/general consensus (though it is unlikely to have happened during Sita's Svayamvara). ~ PS: In Treta, one of the major reasons for the Ramayana War... was to destroy dangerous weaponry (including gigantic humanoid-robots like "Kumbhakarna" - that carried a variety of weapons) ~ to protect this planet and civilizations therein. Shri Ram (the Ram-avatar, the 7th Vishnu) also dismantled the "Shiva-dhanush" or Pinaka - euphemism for the most destructive nuclear weapons - after an all-round agreement/general consensus.] ~ Shri Ram and Rishi Valmiki are unlikely to have been contemporaries... and so, Siya-Ram's twins could not have been born in Rishi Valmiki's ashram. Also, Ram did not subject Sita to any ritual (to determine her "chastity"). ~ He abolished such customs... and improved the status/position of women in society. "Agni Pareekshka" is not literal; it is allegorical/metaphoric... and indicative of the challenges they both faced (and surmounted) - to bring about "Ram Rajya". [~ The "agni-pareeksha" would have only made their resolve stronger.] Ram and Sita, along with Lakshman, Hanuman-ji, Angad and others returned to Ayodhya aboard Raavan's fabulous Pushpak Vimana (aircraft) - made available to them by Vibhishana. However, it is possible that Sita-ji departed much before Shri Ram. Maybe some illness claimed her. Thereafter, Shri Ram attended all ceremonies, etc along with a golden statue of Sita-ji. He never re-married, instead concentrating on bringing up their twins (Luv and Kush) and governing his empire as a just ruler. He is regarded as the jewel of the Suryavanshi (sun-flag/ Suryadhvaj/insignia-bearing) Ikshvaku clan (the Raghuvanshi lineage/Raghuvansh or Raghukula - after one of his illustrious ancestors, Raghu)... and the most beneficent ruler the land had ever seen. ~ It is unlikely that Shri Ram and his siblings took "jal-samadhi" or "salilasamadhi". The "Bhakti Movement" (probably) influenced it. ... 'Coz several greats of the "Bhakti Movement" such as: Sri Chaitanyadev, Guru Nanakdevji and Sant Kabir, even Sant Eknath and Trailanga Swami are believed to have taken "jal-samadhi" or "salilasamadhi". Therefore: this bit (Shri Ram and his siblings taking jal-samadhi)... is of tributary nature. ~ My guess is as good as yours.] (PPS:From what we can gather, the Ram-avatar (the 7thVishnu), the Krishn-avatar (the 8th Vishnu) and the Kalkiḥ-avatar (the 10th Vishnu) are Purna avatars, and therefore, the Almighty (jagat-patiḥ) Himself (albeit in the flesh, in His human form). ... While (Yajña, better known as) Svayambhuva Manu (the first "Manu") who (earlier) appeared as Raja Dasarath (Lord Ram's father - in Treta) and as Vasudev (Lord Krshn's father - in Dvapar)... (is predicted to) finally appear as Vishnuyash/Vishnuyashas/Vishnuyash Sharma (Lord Kalkiḥ's father - at yuga-sandhyāyām/at the conjunction of two yugs [Kaliyug and Sat/Satya/Krita Yug of the next cycle; sandhyāyām = evening, twilight]). || bhavane vishnuyashasah kalkih pradurbhavishyati || ~ Lord Kalki will appear (prādúr) in the home (bhavanê) of Vishnuyasha in the future (bhavishyati). And be born to Vishnuyasha (janitā viṣṇu-yaśaso). ~ The appearance would be during: athāsau yuga-sandhyāyām: at the conjunction of two yugs (Kaliyug and Sat/Satya/Krita Yug of the next cycle; sandhyāyām = evening, twilight, dusk.) ~ At this time the 'Iron Age'/negative aspects of Kaliyug will be at its peak. In other words: ghor Kaliyug. ~ Now, Vishnuyash/Vishnuyashas could be a name per se, or it could be an allegorical name (to indicate affluence, etc. It could also mean: devotee of Lord Vishnu/Narayan. Vishnuyash is described as Brahmanasya, i.e. he will be a Brahmana, implying erudition; he will also be the head of Shambhala village: shambhala-grama-mukhyasya.) [PS: Shambhala = Shambhu (Shiv) + Le (of). ~ So, is Shambhala the Tibetan version of Shivalaya? Therefore, is Shambhala and the land of Shambhu Nath one and the same? Is Shambhu Nath - the Ruler (Nath) as well as Guardian/Protector of Shambhala? And is "Shambhu Nath", the Kalki-avatar and Maitreya Buddha the same person? ~ My guess is as good as yours.] Note:Our ancient Brahmanas (learned persons) - perhaps due to their interactions with Higher Beings - were aware of the arrival of maha-avatars/great incarnations (~ the descent of the divine into human/earthly form). Thus, (e.g.) Lord Ram (the 7th Vishnu) and Lord Krishna (the 8th Vishnu) are known as "maha-avatar" (the Almighty Himself, albeit in the flesh) and their names are (thus) prefixed with the honorific "Bhagavan". [Lord Krishna is considered as the Cosmic Person/Being in his totality of manifestation. He is not an Avatar of the Cosmic Person/Being, but is considered as the Cosmic Person/Being Himself (though, in the flesh). || krishnas tu bhagavan svayam || ~ He is the Cosmic Teacher and Cosmic Ruler.] While Shri Gautama Buddh is called "Bhagavan" and the 9th Vishnu. The Kalki-avatar too is acknowledged as the 10th Vishnu and prefixed with the honorific "Bhagavan". [~ The Kalki-avatar is also referred to as jagat-patiḥ (implying: Lord of Creation/Sovereign of the Universe... and therefore, the Almighty Himself.)] ~ This avatar is (also) regarded as the return of Shri Krishn in another form. However, since this avatar is believed to be a Sampoorna Avatar (complete, all-embracing avatar), whether He will (e.g.) also be Lord Maitreya Buddha (the next Buddha-to-be after Gautama Buddha/Shakyamuni Buddha), or the Saoshyant of the Zoroastrians, or (for that matter) the second coming of Christ (... as per "Ekam Sat Vipraha Bahudha Vadanti" ~ Truth is one, but the wise know/call it as many | God is one, but we can approach Him in many ways. ~ "Whosoever comes to Me, through whatsoever form, I reach him; all men are struggling through paths which in the end lead to me.") ~ my guess is as good as yours~ On the other hand, greats like Arjun, or (e.g.) other great emperors like Mandhata, Sagara, Dileepa, Dushyant, Bharat, Yayati, Bhagirath, Dasarath or even Ikshvaku and Raghu (after whom Lord Ram's lineage is named: Ikshvaku lineage or Raghuvansh/Raghukula) or for that matter Samraat Chandragupta Maurya, Samraat Aśoka, Samraat Samudragupta or Samraat Vikramaditya (Chandragupta II) et al - despite their glorious deeds/karm, and despite their illustrious reigns too acknowledged as "Golden Age" - are not called "Bhagavan". ~ Instead, they are respected as great humans: karmveer and kirtimaan. ... The maha-avatars (on the other hand) are in a league of their own; their purpose (for being among humans) is different; they are Renaissance Men/Yug Purush: their actions (in the face of great adversities, challenges and impediments) bring about all-round positive change, and are (performed) for the greater good; they are nishkam "karm-yogis": they provide hope and guidance and (also) help bring about a change in (entrenched) mindset, conditioning, perception et al... so as to help build a better society. ~ None of which is transient. Especially when apathy, silence, a cavalier attitude or perfunctoriness (at best) is the general norm; also, attempting to bring about positive change as a pioneer (without the benefit of a precedence) is even harder. Through their steadfast effort/karm, the maha-avatars help reinvigorate the core principles/values/ethics (without which a society, nation and people will stagnate and degenerate/wither away). They dare to dream... and strive/toil endlessly to bring it into existence, to bring to fruition what was envisaged for posterity. ~ They 'turn the wheel' in the face of a great amount of negativities and despite a lot of 'toxin' and 'venom' spewed at them. And yet, they persevere; they go through the proverbial "agni-pareeksha" (with equanimity) for others, for the sake of humanity. They are inspirational; they are dispellers/'lifters' of 'dark clouds' (of hopelessness and pessimism), they are bringers of sunshine and joy; they are the finest nation-builders and statesmen. They are (thus) saviours (of a nation and a people - salvaging them from quagmire or preventing their descent into abyss/'quicksand'). They provide a road-map and show the way forward. 'Coz nation-building is a long-term process. ~ Due to their (nishkam) nature and temperament... they act as path-breakers and path-finders (trail-blazers)... (thereby) making it easier for others to walk on that trail/path. They perform very difficult tasks with ease... which (even) for great humans may not be achievable. They are passionate; they not only put in their time but also their heart into it. They inspire and transform human consciousness. Like an alchemist, they turn base emotions of anger, irritation and rage into the gold of wisdom and critical thinking, and through their inspiring words and deeds they transform social inertia into hope and action. ... The universe is very vast; the earth and earthlings are but a mere speck... and yet, the Almighty comes to help and guide. ~ Not as if to do earthlings a favour, but as dharma (a show of duty to the larger good). Therein lay the grace and greatness of the divine. ["Bhagavan" is not a title that could be bestowed, and none of the above took on the honorific on their own. ~ Maha-avatars never proclaim/announce themselves as "Bhagavan" or maha-avatar. They are nishkam; they do not aspire for praise or glory or 'eternal life', and so on... despite tremendous achievements/accomplishments and contribution. That is the kind of equipoise/equanimity they possess. Instead, they simply (quietly and diligently) help humanity. ... And, once they perform/achieve/accomplish all that they had set out to do, they depart... (yet again) leaving their indelible mark upon the sands of time... for us to follow and emulate.] 

The maha-avatars are Cosmic Teachers. They guide. They arrive to revitalize/reinvigorate dharma and karm (for the larger good)... and (thus) act as catalysts. They are also the ones who pull humanity/society out of quagmire/'mud' and into the 'sunlight'. ~ They make their appearance at very difficult/challenging times - when mankind/humanity finds itself totally handicapped and without a solution; when the debilitating 'fog' of confusion, negativism and stagnation holds sway. Thus, their circumstances are never ideal; they also have to contend with an assortment of (negative, petty, myopic and/or megalomaniac) entities arrayed against them (~ they do not have the upper-hand, i.e. they are never in a position of strength, vis-à-vis their adversaries. Though, they adapt - depending on the challenges and circumstances). And yet, they show the way; in a manner of speaking, they wade/swim through the sea of troubles holding our hands and lead us to shore. ~ Krishn is all-knowing (not to be mistaken for 'know-all'); he is very clear-eyed and with an exceptional grasp of events and their likely trajectory (i.e. how they will play out/evolve) in the short/medium and long term. But then, the rest (be they ordinary people or important personalities and entities) weren't quite like him. Later on, even Arjun was overcome with feelings of weakness and confusion. [Thus Krishn had to brush away the cobwebs in Arjun's mind as well - though he neither commands nor intimidates Arjun. On the contrary, he remains tenacious and inspires tenacity; he is (also) very patient, ghanshyam (soaking up 'toxin'/'venom' directed at him), persuasive, provides sustained support and advice, bides his time, slowly but surely (and smilingly) outmaneuvers the negative/malevolent entities (for the larger good); he is sorted and not full of himself, his fame/stature sits lightly upon his shoulders. He is the Cosmic Teacher after all. ~ And, he is not called guide/sarathy, a great visionary, Master strategist and Soldier-Statesman par excellence for nothing.] ~ He wasn't amongst humans to become emperor (samraat/Maharajadhiraj) himself, he is Chir-Sarathy (Eternal Charioteer/Perennial Guide); the reason he persevered (became part of various 'manthan') could be to let out the 'toxin'/'venom'/halahala - so as to take the blinders off (others' mind and thoughts) ~ to usher in a "new dawn"/positive change/incremental change organically... and to ensure its continuation organically. (~ By dispelling 'fog' of confusion, delusion, 'filth'/'toxin' et al... he helped bring about clarity of thought/cognition and introspection - organically.) ~ He was also amongst humans to help/guide in the transition from Dvapar to Kaliyug. [Kali means 'bud'; it gradually opens to become a fully-blooming 'flower'; it is only at the end of Kaliyug that the 'flower' withers away to give rise to 'ghor Kaliyug' - when the 'Iron Age' (negative aspects) of Kaliyug is at its peak.] ~ BG 10.34: || udbhavaś ca bhaviṣyatām || ~ "... and I am the generating principle/cause/energy of all that is yet to be." (Alternatively: "...  and I am too the birth of all that shall come into being") - is many-hued. ~ Krishn is not merely the Cosmic Ruler; he is also the Cosmic Teacher. ~ He is (also) very real, despite his godliness; he and his message is evergreen - relevant and relatable - no matter the era/yug. He is tremendously inspirational... and yet, he is not a mere mortal. He is no ordinary human. His descent in earthly/human form was for a purpose. He lived amongst humans for a purpose. BG 7.26: || vedaham samatitanivartamanani carjunabhavisyani ca bhutani mam tu veda na kascana || ~ "O Arjun, I know everything that has happened in the past, all that is happening in the present, and all things that are yet to come. I also know all living entities; but Me no one knows." [Hence Krishn was all-knowing. He also knew each soul (individual or human soul/jiva-atma).] ~ However, Shri Ram, on the other hand, has (unfortunately and perhaps even unwittingly) been turned into a straw-man (courtesy the multitude of re-telling, stage plays, folk theatre et al). And, ever since concepts like "race" has come about, various narratives have mired his name. Maybe this provided credibility and mileage. (But in a high-emotion-country what that has done is anybody's guess.) ~ While the West turned a massive hero out of someone like Alexander!! ~ One wonders, what they might have done if they were to have genuine heroes like Shri Ram and Shri Krishn. [~ Once a dubious narrative is created, it takes several others to sustain it. This not only creates undesirable (and corrosive) viewpoints and mindset, but also blurs the fine line between fact and fiction, between reality and make-believe. Thus lucidity, clearness of thought, loses its way into the dreary desert sand of dead habit.] ... Umm, have Indians been their own worst adversaries/antagonists... after the decline of the Gupta era? ~ Yes, colonization did happen, and a whole bunch of our current ills can be blamed on it... but then, three fingers point right back at us too. ~ My guess is as good as yours. [There is a possibility though that Ramesses II (referred to as Ramesses the Great), ancientMiṣr/Egypt's most prolific ruler, often regarded as the greatest, most celebrated, and most powerful pharaoh of the (ancient) Egyptian Empire, is named after Shri Ram. Ramesses is anglicized. It could be a variant of Ram-Ashish (due to difference/change in phonetics.) (~ That ancient Miṣr and ancient India shared a connection is quite evident. Do read paragraph #15 of the previous portion/section - to get the drift.)]

Pic: Illustration of Apsara. ~ Contrary to popular belief, Apsaras were not celestial beings but female Gandharvas. Saras = lake or water-body, besides being a reference to the lake-bird - the Sarus Crane. [This lake-bird (Sanskrit: Sarasa) is much-venerated in our culture and is also associated with MaharshiValmiki.] The Sarus Crane (also: Saras Crane) performs territorial and courtship displays that include loud trumpeting, leaps and dance-like movements. The female Gandharvas, as we know, were adept at performing arts, and these may have included leaps and energetic dance-like movements (much like Ballet and Flamenco) - to the accompaniment of gay music. ~ Hence, (probably) over time, the female Gandharvas first came to be associated with the Saras Crane, and then (gradually) began to be referred to as the "Ap-Saras" (possibly: 'saras-like') - which later gave way to "Apsara". ~ They were also regarded as possessors of great knowledge, be it in the fine arts, performing arts, medicinal herbs, flowers, perfumes, and the like. Urvashi, Menaka, Rambha, Tillottama were legendary Apsaras. ~ On a separate note: the name "Flamenco" may have been derived from Flamingo. And the Saras and Flamingo (of another era/yug) may have been related. It is worth noting that the Flamingo is a mix of bright and lighter shades of pink, while the Flamenco dancers wear red. [So did Ballet and Flamenco originate in ancient India? ~ My guess is as good as yours.] ... However: one mustn't confuse the Flamingo for the Sarus Crane and vice versa... on account of their long-legs and brightly coloured plumage. They are otherwise quite different. ~ The Gandharvas (probably) were an offshoot/sub-clanof the Sura/Deva people. The name Gandharva is of Sanskrit origin, and is very likely derived from the Sanskrit word gandha, meaning perfume, odour or smell. These people were renowned for their great knowledge of flowers, aromatic herbs, plants and birds. Hence "Gandharva" is a reference to the spices and aromatic herbs that they [~ possibly the inhabitants of ancient Northwest South Asia and surrounding areas, including Bakthria and maybe also (some of) the people who use the Kharoṣṭhī script - though the current geography has undergone some changes due to the elements, etc] traded and with which they anointed themselves. They were also well-versed in music and dance besides being expert players of a variety of musical instruments. 

Pic: Illustration of Vibhishana-Mandodari marriage. ~ Ravana was born to the (learned Brahmana) sage/Rishi Vishrava (or Vesamuni), and his wife, the Daitya princess Kaikesi. [Danava, Rakshasa and Daitya were 'Asura' sub-clans. The human 'Deva' people were not "demi-god", and 'Asura' were not "demon". Such connotations have come about... thanks to mistranslation.] His queen/consort Mandodari was the daughter of Mayasura (the King of the Asuras - possibly, the overall sovereign of all Asura sub-clans) and the apsara Hema. [Apsara: female Gandharva, an offshoot of the Deva clan/people.] After Raavan's funeral, Shri Ram advised Vibhishana to marry Mandodari (Raavan's queen/consort, and [very likely] Sita's real mother*). Thereafter, he arranged for Vibhishana's coronation... before returning to Ayodhya (in Ravana's Pushpak Vimana made available to him by Vibhishana; this return to Ayodhya - after 14 years - is celebrated/commemorated through "Deepavali". However, whether this commemoration is continuing since Treta or is due to Tulsidas and his Ram-lila ~ my guess is as good as yours.) Siya-Ram and Lakshman, Vibhishana, Van-nar-raj Sugreeva (besides Hanuman-ji and Angad), Riksharaj Jambavan, Vyadh chief/Nishada-raj Guhaka et al became personal friends and firm allies. ... However, Hanuman-ji could not have set fire to Lanka with his tail - he was not a monkey; he was human. This bit too (probably) is a result of later dramatics, folk theatre et al. Also, indulging in plunder and pillage was most un-Aryan-like (ignoble); it is unlikely that Shri Ram, one of the finest of Aryans, ever indulged in such activities. Also, Vibhishana succeeded Ravana. What would he have governed over then? Besides, Shri Ram and Vibhishana were personal friends and allies. [*In the current era (Kaliyug) Samraat Vikramaditya/Chandragupta II, son of Samraat Samudragupta, married Dhruva Devi (his elder brother Ramgupta's queen/consort). ... The cowardly Ramgupta's reign lasted for five years. When the Mlechcha Saka king (Rudrasimha III) asked him to surrender his queen/consort (Dhruva Devi) - in return for peace... Ramgupta readily acquiesced. [Imagine the ignominy this land would have been under - for all times to come?!] ~ However, all that was averted by the intervention of his younger brother (the then Yuvaraj) Chandragupta - who (in the guise of a woman) mounted a surprise attack on the Sakas, slew the Mlechcha Saka king and returned victorious. [~ It is said that Ramgupta was deposed and killed by Chandragupta. However, given the turn of events... that may not have been necessary. Ramgupta probably took his own life. After all, what face did he have in front of his queen/consort and people (after proving to be a total wimp)? Especially since he was neither known for his intellectual acuity nor achievement(s). And, from what we can gather, Dhruva Devi was way out of his league. ~ My guess is as good as yours.] ~ Thereupon, Yuvaraj Chandragupta married Dhruva Devi, ascended the throne... and became known as Maharajadhiraj Chandragupta II. ~ He assumed the title of "Vikramaditya" - after thwarting the imperialistic machinations and ambitions of the Sakas, and drove them out of wide swathes of land, (probably almost the whole of modern Asia). He also erected the Garuda Stambh (in honour of Lord Narayan/Vishnu; Lord Narayan is Garuda-Dhvaja, it is His symbol or insignia) to commemorate this event. ~ Vikramaditya established peace and prosperity under his wise, benevolent and enlightened rule - one of the finest of our 'Golden Ages'. [Vikram means: one who is wise, diligent, brave and strong as well as victorious. The Sanskrit word -kram is a root word meaning 'step or stride', so the name Vikram can be understood to mean Vishnu's stride in itself, or as a name which reflects the qualities of Vishnu's stride. [Vishnuh: Long-striding (as with vigour).] In Vedic scripture, Vishnu's stride is said to be over the Earth, the Sky, and the all-pervading omnipresent essence of the Universe/Cosmos. Hence Shri Vishnu is also known as Trivikram. Aaditya = the Sun (also indicates Brahm-Jyoti and Lord Narayan's scintillating effulgence). Therefore, Vikramaditya roughly translates as: the radiance of Vikram.] ~ Maybe the cosmic trinity (Trimurti: Satyam-Shivam-Sundaram) was bifurcated (underwent a bifurcation)... after the decline of the Gupta era (with the possible accompanyment of various texts/literature). ~ My guess is as good as yours. Vikramaditya and Dhruva Devi's son, Kumaragupta I (Mahendraditya), too was an able ruler. [However, Emperor Chandragupta II Vikramaditya and the Vikramaditya of the Vikram-Vetal stories are not same.] 

Pic: Chandragupta II Gold Dinar; 7.75g; Archer type coin. ~ The Garuda Stambh put up by Vikramaditya bears an inscription, which states that it was erected as a flagstaff in honour of Shri Vishnu, and in the memory of Chandragupta II (Vikramaditya). The pillar also highlights ancient India's achievements in metallurgy. ~ Vikramaditya was not merely an emperor, or rather Maharajadhiraj (king of kings) and Chakravartin, but also (perhaps) regarded himself as 'representative' of Lord Narayan/Vishnu. ~ No wonder: under his statesmanship the Gupta Empire achieved its zenith, science, mathematics, astronomy, metallurgy, art, architecture, literature, poetry and sculpture flourished, and the cultural development of ancient India reached its climax. [Chaturanga (Sanskrit: caturaṅga) - an ancient Indian strategy game, (and the common ancestor of the board games chess, shogi, makruk, xiangqi and janggi) too was developed during the Gupta era (around the 6th century AD). In the 7th century, it was adopted as shatranjin Sassanid Persia, which in turn was the form of chess brought to late-medieval Europe. Caturaṅga and shatranj - once again indicates the Avestan Persian-Sanskrit connection.] ~ The above coin of Chandragupta II Vikramaditya is a celebration of the exquisite and sublime skills of the artist who designed the die for this coin which demonstrates why the Gupta Period is called the golden age of Indian history. This time period saw all round development. The above coin is a tribute to the skills and artistry of the die engraver than the image that the coin itself bears. The die cutter has managed to achieve the following objectives simultaneously: The features of the emperor are portrayed as extremely youthful: 'Chir-Yauvana' or Eternal Youth is an elixir that mankind/humanity, and more so the Ruler, has sought since time immemorial. This coin shows how the die cutter wishes the Maharajadhiraj to be remembered amongst his subjects and for posterity as a handsome youthful emperor. The body of the emperor is lithe, supple, muscular and well-proportioned. This complements and brings out the relative youthfulness of the emperor. The message to be conveyed by this coin: 'Hail the Emperor, Glory be to Him, our benevolent Maharajadhiraj, our Protector, the Strong and Valiant Chandragupta'. ~ The emperor exudes an aura of energy, vigour and vitality even as he stands in the 'dvibhanga' pose (head and torso inclined to the right with lower limbs in opposite direction, a common feature applied in Indian sculptor and classical dance, especially Odissi). The emperor appears calm, composed and serene. This is a delicate balance that has admirably been achieved by the die cutter. The emperor holding a Bow in his left arm while drawing an Arrow from his right hand only accentuates the powerful image of the emperor as a young, energetic protector who is well disposed and endowed with the strength (and capacity) to overcome any detractors. While the soft features of the emperor together with his slender frame is non-intimidating. ~ He is a benevolent emperor. The swaying 'mudra' or pose of the standing emperor is a feature of Gupta coins to reflect/indicate that the emperor is higher than a mere mortal... as a man's body is imperfect being straight, rigid and stiff. The graceful sway is achieved by giving a curve or twist at the neck (head) and waist (out thrust hips), the 'Dvibhanga' pose, or the neck, waist and knee, the 'Tribhanga' pose. [The idols/images of Shri Ram, Shri Krishna, Shri Vishnu et al are also depicted in the above 'mudra'/pose.] ~ On the reverse is the image of the Goddess Sri Sri Lakshmi. She holds a flower (lotus) by a short stalk in her upraised left arm, a 'pasa' or lasso in her right hand and sits in the yogic 'Padmasana' posture atop a Lotus. It must be remembered that these symbols on the coin are a depiction of the iconographic manifestation of our ancient philosophy. The Lotus flower blooms amidst the muck and filth of muddy swamps and marshes and symbolizes a person's ability to rise, similar to the Lotus flower, from the dark depths of ignorance and gain happiness (and contentment) with the beauty and radiance of spiritual knowledge (also: self-realization). The open flowers of the Lotus that blossoms and spreads out signifies the Sun, an essential life-nourishing source as well as the light that destroys/dispels ignorance and illuminates wisdom. (~ However, this philosophy is applicable to ordinary mortals/humans; not to the Almighty. The Almighty Himself is the Supreme Lotus - the Cosmic Ruler and Cosmic Teacher (as maha-avatars). Our ancients understood this concept very well. [~ They did not exaggerate. But given their vaulting imagination, they could capture and convey our 'pracheen itihasa' in a manner that even a child could easily understand. History became interesting and wondrous... and was (thus) effortlessly passed on to the next/future generation(s). It also inculcated a spirit of curiosity and scholarship (a habit of reading). It was akin to solving riddles and puzzles. ~ However, later interpreters were unable to comprehend the technological aspects, etc, and so, improvised... merely succeeding in capturing and reflecting the sign of the times.] ~ The 'pasa' (noose or lasso) signifies an attachment to worldly matters (selfish desires like praise, glory, etc) as well as the capability of God to capture negativities and (blind) ignorance. ~ Though we do not have any details of the die engravers name in the historical records... but given the finesse and fine style achieved in executing the portrayal of the emperor on the coin, he must have been a person held in high esteem for his die engraving skills. All in all, this coin is a great masterpiece of the Gupta miniature art on a Gold Coin of the great Maharajadhiraj Chandragupta II Vikramaditya... simply because of the beautiful rendition of the emperor's features, posture and the message it seeks to convey. ~ Which brings to mind, even Shri Ram and Shri Krishn are never depicted as aged or even middle-aged. They are always shown as extremely youthful (evergreen), handsome and energetic. ... Maybe, that is how various artists et al wished to depict them. Maybe, that is the message that various artists/visualizers and sculptors (through the ages) sought to convey. Maybe, that is how they wished Shri Ram and Shri Krishn to be remembered (by the people and for posterity). ~ And this also brings to mind, that one doesn't quite recollect having seen an idol or image of the Buddha as an aged person (or even a middle-aged one). ~ So, maybe, the same thought/sentiment are applicable in his case as well.

Pic: Illustration of Hanuman-ji. ~ Manthara was a "Vamani", implying a small-sized human (maybe, Yakshi); she may not have been a "kubja" - a hunchback woman... that is (in all likelihood) courtesy later dramatists; she was also Kaikeyi's governess and very trusted. Hanuman-ji 'tearing open his chest' to show Siya-Ram resides in his heart = tattoo or body art. Hanuman-ji was not a monkey, nor Riksharaj Jambavan a bear, per se. Perhaps Hanuman-ji (as well as Van-nar-raj Sugreev and Angad) belonged to an adivasi group that evolved from animal-like ancestors resembling ape-man (not per se, but 'van-nar' or 'van-manush'; man with ape nature), due to the shape of their skull, jawline, teeth, etc. ~ While Riksharaj Jambavan (the king/chief of the Riksha-s) - an adivasi group that [probably] evolved from animal-like ancestors resembling bears (due to the shape of their skull, jawline, teeth, hirsuteness, etc.) ~ "Riksha" (Sanskrit: Ṛkṣa) is Sanskrit for bear, while the animal-like ancestors (of certain adivasi groups) that resembled ape-man (not per se, rather: man with ape nature) were probably known as 'van-nar', or 'van-manush'. ... With time (post the decline of the Gupta era, that is), "Van-nar" became "Vanar" (perhaps due to a change of phonetics and meaning) and came to be equated with monkey. ~ My guess is as good as yours. ["Greeva" or "Griva" as well as "Hanu" indicate jawin Sanskrit. ... Perhaps Sugreeva was the most handsome person in his group/clan, and was (therefore) called/christened Sugreeva. (Su = good, handsome).] In Sanaatan Dharmic tradition, the Sapta Rishi Mandala or the Constellation of the Great Bear/Ursa Major (sapta-riksha) is the abode of the seven Rishi (Sapta-Rishi) - the Great Well Wisher of the Universe, also connecting humans and Gods [Higher Beings; devas, demi-gods, etc]; now, whether Ṛkṣa (originally) gave rise to the word "rishi" (ṛṣI) or not ~ my guess is as good as yours. ~ Also, Hanumanji was a highly-skilled pilot and flew a variety of aircraft (vimana). This (very likely) has been mistranslated as 'Hanuman-ji carried Ram and Lakshman on his shoulders'. ['Pavan-putra': Airman; maybe he was one of the best pilots of his time... and was (thus) referred to as or given the title of "Pavan-putra".] ~ My guess is as good as yours. [The writers, dramatists, poets, translators et al of the post Gupta period not only not understand the scientific and technological aspects mentioned in the 'pracheen itihasa/ancient history' known as the "Ramayana", they were perhaps (also) unaware of the veritable treasure-trove of information, science, technology, knowledge, know-how, wisdom, history, philosophy, literature et al they were attempting to translate. And so, went about improvising... and ended up editing the main narrative itself - to suit the sign of the times, (and maybe even) to suit the props and histrionic abilities of the actors and artists, and so on. ~ If only they had kept the original work as is... and authored their (own) versions with an appropriate rejoinder. But... alas. ~ Especially since Sanaatan Dharma and Vigjnana have always gone hand in hand, both have been integral to each other. Vigjnana - in the Indian thought/system - was never boring or cut-and-dried narrative. For our ancients science did not signify a mechanistic analysis of facts, but rather a broader interpretation, a wider perception of the universe. Having their wisdom firmly rooted to the teachings of the ancient Upanishads and the Vedas, they conceived Nature not merely as a physical phenomenon, but a living spirit, which could help man to realize the essential Truth of Life. ... The combination of our ancient, enlightened wisdom, guidance, philosophy, art, literature, etc paired with science, research and innovation... is what brought seekers of knowledge (students and learned persons alike) from distant lands. They went away enriched... carrying with them a piece of ancient India. Thus, Indian thought and knowledge illumined the minds of denizens of far-off lands. ~ It was the route to/of ancient India's preeminence. It helped establish 'Yoga' or 'Sanjog' (to connect) - cutting across distance and diversities. As a result, trade flourished. While labour-intensive activities... that not only generated employment and revenue, but also nurtured creativity (concentration and application of mind), was aplenty. Besides, our ancient Brahmanas (learned persons) were not averse to synergy and cross-pollination. Hence they studied the works of the ancient Greeks and the Romans... and then wrote and shared their own comments, treatises and views on them. Thus, there was no stagnation or intellectual regimentation (leading to intellectual degeneration and decay ~ a veritable 'quicksand'... emerging from which is a mammoth task). ~ As they say: a rolling stone gathers no moss. ... The true power/potential of "Yoga" and "Sanjog" - is immense; it can bring forth kundalini energy... that bland and tepid stuff/jargon like "low hanging fruit", "soft power" et al can never generate/realise/unleash ~ my guess is as good as yours.]

However, what made all of this possible was the enlightened thinking and 'way of life' - followed by our ancients. At the core of which lay the Cakravartin, for purposes of comprehension, let's say: the 'Cakravartin system of governance/administration'. A Cakravartin was not merely an emperor ruling over his vast empire and basking in his own glory. ~ The Indian Cakravartin, on the contrary, was the anchor; head and shoulders above the rest, someone who kept the macro picture in mind; visionary (far-sighted), charismatic, energetic, sagacious, erudite, wise, of even temperament, unselfish (not petty-minded, non-parochial, not given to myopia or vainglory or vanity/false pride), persuasive, with excellent diplomatic and inter-personal skills, and so on; someone who did not (attempt to) impose his thinking or ideas on the rest; someone who knew when to be magnanimous. There was no "polity-based" system, though. 'Coz ancient India (no matter by what name this land was called) was no stranger to our mind-boggling diversity (as well as very complex demographics). However, a Cakravartin knew how to turn all of that into strength, and therefore, an advantage. A Cakravartin was (thus) a unifier, a binding force/factor; a leader, a ruler, an administrator, a teacher, a catalyst, a reformer and a well-wisher of the people; one who could take diversities (of all kinds) along. His empire was not a monolith, but rather a confederation (with maximum internal autonomy). There were kings and chieftains (janapadin) governing their own big and small regions/kingdoms/territories (janapadas and mahajanapadas), and yet, they all functioned under the all-embracing "umbrella" (and wise reassuring presence) of the Cakravartin. It was not a "polity-based" system, but a symbiotic one, a synergy-creating one. ~ He was the proverbial banyan tree beneath which all others sheltered. [They did not merely defend the territories/empire from external aggression - together, but enjoyed maximum internal autonomy as well. ~ Yet again, a win-win. In a way, we can say, collectivism/democracy at its best... under the "wisdom tree" (guiding spirit/Chakravartin). There was co-dependence, and therefore, co-operation and collaboration; this ensured peace; they progressed and prospered together.] ... And, as we know, ancient India was marked by all-round progress and preeminence.  ~ Not that there were no military conquests. There were. But there was no colonization, exploitation, slave-taking, plundering et al a la (e.g.) Alexander... who left a trail of devastation in his wake. ~ A conquered nation and people were not treated shabbily; their 'way of life' etc were not overhauled; the women-folk, elderly people and children were not mistreated; livestock/animals, plants/trees were not harmed, water-bodies were not polluted - 'coz all of these were against Arya Dharma. Instead, a conquered nation and people were provided with better governance/administration... than what they experienced before (rather there was no discrimination). This helped to generate goodwill - for both to understand each other better, to communicate, to (thus) to integrate and to continue to create synergy. It resulted in cross-pollination. Perhaps (for purposes of comprehension), we can say: it led to a win-win. [Thus, examples were also set, and lessons effortlessly passed on to the next/future generation(s) ~ the quiet 'turning of the wheel'.] ~ Ancient India had a long-lived civilization and culture. Collaboration is the key to success in any venture... and this explains the multifarious achievements of the ancient Indians. ... The economy was robust and trade flourished (both overland trade and sea-borne trade... in raw materials, manufactured goods and objects). In fact, Indian trade history is remarkable. Indian trade benefited and so did the world. ~ And all because: ancient India had realized that at the end of the day, maximizing use of one's own resources is what makes all the difference. ... The wisdom behind the 'Chakravartin system of governance/administration' is this: diverse nations/cultures/peoples were able to celebrate and share their ideals and aspirations... leading to harmony, wholeness and integrity. [A veritable rainbow.] As a result: they were (largely) able to rise above their petty identities, narrow self-interests, and prejudices/disputes; they were (thus) also able to identify with their commonalities. ~ This balanced and holistic worldview was a prerequisite for a sustainable and resilient future. This was the big vision... integrating the multifaceted nature of their co-existence with collaboration. ~ It needed collective effort: coexistence and cooperation. Recognizing and/or accepting intricacies (composite culture/diversities) required forbearance and understanding. It neededenergetic engagement with diversity - an achievement, 'coz mere diversity without real (organic) relationship would have yielded schisms/misunderstandings; the 'Chakravartin system of governance/administration' (instead) sought understanding across lines of difference, thus their ignorance of one another was minimized. They could hold their deepest differences not in isolation, but in relationship to one another: through constructive dialogue (both speaking and listening) and engagement, give and take, mutual respect, and so on... and this process (very likely) revealed both common understandings and real differences; however, given their guiding/management principles and qualitative approach/attitude/disposition, they could surge over or submerge these differences... leading to an organic confederation (of composite cultures/peoples/nations) that defended together and shared/created together. They were (perhaps) able to reflect upon and assimilate the spirit of oneness. Coercion or craftiness/cunning (as opposed to diplomacy, patience, give and take and tactfulness) may not have achieved this level/quality of cohesion and endurance between superdiversities; instead, it may have widened and/or given rise to all manner of asymmetries and (ultimately) become a nemesis (ruinous or self-defeating). A quick note on Samraat Ashoka: Our history books say Ashoka killed 99 of his brothers. ~ Umm, not sure whether we should take this figure at face-value. Only Duryodhan was known to have 99 brothers. ... So, was this a result of some later dramatization (for purposes of stage plays, folk theatre, wandering theatre, and so on)? ~ My guess is as good as yours. Also, in the Indian system the succession plan was well-defined. It was based on primogeniture, unless the ruler/king/emperor chose otherwise (with due reasons, of course). Now, coming to the Kalinga War: it was a hilly and heavily-forested area. Would such a terrain have accommodated such a vast population, as is indicated by the supposed casualty (and PoW) figures... which apparently turned (Chanda)Ashoka into "Dharmashoka"? ~ Especially since words like "Chandal" is itself a later nomenclature (of later periods)... when (the usurper known as) "Brahminical faith" came about. Therefore, was this too a result of later plays, dramatics, etc or maybe 'manthan' between various groups? ~ My guess is as good as yours. Also, one wonders as to how Samraat Ashok built all those stupas (enshrining the relics of the Buddha) in China? There is also an Ashoka Mountain and an Ashoka Temple there. So what was the contour of his empire? ~ And, why is it that modern history books are silent on this... though they go on and on about the rest? Why do modern history books glorify Alexander? [~ Umm, does it help to create an image of supremacy, sort of to colonize the mind? ~ My guess is as good as yours.] And, why has Parvateshvar (Raja Paurava or Porus - to the Greeks) been ignored? ~ My guess is as good as yours. Alexander's career more or less came to a halt after his brief encounter with this king of the Indus region, RajaParvateshvar (Porus). (The Greeks however, had some success ruling as kings in northwestern cities such as the one in Takshasheela.) [On a separate note, Paurava/Porus very likely was part of the Puruvansh or Puru lineage to which the Pandavas and the Kauravas belonged.] About Ashoka embracing Buddhism: Umm, first of all, who coined the term "Buddhism"? When did it come about? ~ 'Coz in Ashoka's time "Buddhism" is unlikely to have existed. It might have been "Boudhya Dharma" at best. But then, Boudhya = of Buddha or of Gautam Buddh, or as guided by the Buddha (the Enlightened One). While "Dharma" (Pali: Dhamma) implies: noble actions, or actions that lead to the greater good, or help build a better society. It does not imply "religion" (as is understood today). Besides, the Maurya clan is believed to have been an offshoot of the Shakya clan to which Shri Gautam Buddh belonged. Also, Bhagavan Shri Gautam Buddh was the 9th Vishnu - and therefore, a maha-avatar of Lord Narayan. Sanaatan Dharm has numerous viewpoints and paths. Dasavatara is part of Sanaatan Dharma. Plus, from whatever we can gather, Gautama Buddh belonged to the Shakya clan (which is believed to be a tributary of the Ikshvaku clan - to which Shri Ram, the 7th Vishnu, belonged). ~ Even if we were to consider the Gupta emperors, we find they erected the Garuda Stambh (in honour of Lord Narayan/Vishnu) - to commemorate the successfull thwarting of the imperialistic ambitions of the Sakas (after driving them out of wide swathes of land, probably almost the whole of modern Asia). Lord Narayan is Garuda-Dhvaja; it is His symbol or insignia. ~ Vishnu, Narayan and Gautama Buddh are not different. Vishnu is another name for Lord Narayan; Gautama Buddh is one of His many avatars (descent in earthly/human form). ... Probably, the Gupta emperors were (also) the ones who installed what is today known as the "Shiv Ling" - to depict the cosmic phenomenon of "creation" and "dissolution". (Please refer to paragraph #7 from the last in the previous portion/section - to get the drift). However, with the passage of time - possibly after the decline of the Gupta era - due to various interpolations, extrapolations, mistranslations and so on, it may have come to be understood/regarded as the "Shiv Ling". ~ Therefore, maybe, the cosmic trinity (Trimurti: Satyam-Shivam-Sundaram) may not have been bifurcated (underwent a bifurcation)... until after the decline of the Gupta era. ~ My guess is as good as yours. 

Pic:Illustration of Shri Ram, the fine Chakravartin. [However, since the humans of Treta would have been quite different from modern humans - we can only speculate about their appearance, height, features, strength, caliber, longevity, intelligence, attire, worldview, and so on. ~ Therefore, none can quite say/depict (with certainty) how Lord Ram actually looked like... 'coz none has ever seen him in Kaliyug.] ... In ancient India, barring few hiccups, the 'Cakravartin system of governance/administration' has pretty much held good (~ until the decline of the Gupta period, that is). Therefore, the earlier Cakravartins (very likely) also concentrated (i.e. invested time and effort) in building a framework/architecture/roadmap - through consensus. And, perhaps, this architecture/roadmap was not tied to them (meaning, it was irrespective of any personality, name, and so on). Maybe, it was based on a long-term understanding of issues and events (and the like), besides, on the future needs of the various lands/regions and people (that came under their all-embracing "umbrella"). Therefore, even when there were some hiccups... it generally held good. Maybe, such a consensus-based framework/architecture/roadmap/system was required to manage/govern diverse cultures and people, with relative seamlessness. Maybe, it (also) aided in a relatively smooth change of guard/transfer of power/succession/transition (in any part of the empire)... and (thus) ensured continuity and peace with minimal turbulence. Also, each emperor/ruler/king/chieftain may not have possessed the same caliber as the one preceding them. So (perhaps) having a consensus-based framework/architecture/roadmap/system made sense. ~ It (probably also) helped to unify while maintaining the cultural diversities et al. ... And this (perhaps) also enabled the Cakravartin to concentrate (invest time and effort) on other important aspects, such as all-round progress, trade, innovation, and so on... instead of having to firefight all the time or expend all his time and energies in dispute-resolution/crisis-management. ~ Shri Ram was a fine Chakravartin. [However, his empire was not confined within the contours of modern India. ~ Though with the passage of time, the geography and landscape/topography on Earth too would not have remained unchanged, courtesy man-made events, natural calamities, corrosive action of the waters et al.] Shri Krishna too, though not a samraat (emperor) himself, was a fine Chakravartin, given his actions, foresight and guidance. | Sita was not the sad, weepy, tragic figure that she is made out to be. She was extremely erudite, intelligent and (also) knew how to 'lift the Shiva-dhanush' (i.e. how to dismantle the 'Shiva-dhanush' or Pinaka) - a euphemistic reference to the most destructive nuclear weapons (perhaps far more destructive than what we find today). There can be no doubt that Ram and Sita were very compatible; that they were soul-mates. Shri Ram was not the stunned-looking, expressionless entity that instantly come to mind... courtesy various depictions. ~ He is described as tall, strong and handsome. [However, since the humans of Treta would have been quite different from modern humans - we can only speculate about their appearance, height, strength, caliber, longevity, attire, worldview, and so on.] Shri Ram is also said to have been 'vishalaksha' or big-eyed and puṣkara-locanaḥ - 'lotus-eyed' (i.e. one whose eyes are shaped like lotus petals). However, since his eyes are compared to the Blue Lotus (pushkara or indivara), could it be that he was (shimmering) blue-eyed? ~ My guess is as good as yours. Shri Krishn is also puṣkara-locanaḥ, puṣkara-akṣaḥ, puṣkara-īkṣaṇah ~ 'lotus-eyed'. Therefore, there seems to be some physical similarities (as well as similarities in character and temperament: wisdom, intelligence, statesmanship, thought-leaders, transformational figures-reformers-change-agents-catalysts-facilitators, sheer presence (iridescent presence), erudition, tenacity, fortitude, far-sightedness, pro-activeness, people skills, patience, valiance, and so on) between Shri Ram and Shri Krishn. ~ Brilliance, effortless charm, dynamism, character, and heart. Strong stuff. Also, there seem to be a quiet, delightful and endearing simplicity about them. Besides, neither were overtly aggressive nor displayed machismo. ~ They did not have to try too hard. Both were pleasant and effortless; alpha male with princely qualities. In other words: a Complete Man. ~ And both were committed to their respective consorts, Sita and Rukmani (~ when, e.g. Dasarath had three queens.) Ram is very different from Dasarath (he also ascended the throne... but not as Dasarath's heir), while Krishn and Vasudev too are worlds apart (~ and Krishn is completely independent of Vasudev. In fact, his advent on the scene coincided with the most difficult time for the country; his dethroned family did not help matters for him; his dethroned grandfather [the old Ugrasena] or his father [Vasudev] could not have given him a leg-up or lent him a helping hand either. Also, the fact that influential members of his clan/family had aligned their interests with Jarasandh and Kansh, coupled with the latter's machinations... made the going very hard for him. He was thus baptized by fire, so to speak. ~ It was not a fairy-tale or cakewalk. However, all that did not turn him into a negative person; he was not pessimistic or sullen. He remained cheerful, resilient and invigorating. Besides, he was steely-nerved and politically astute, and possessed plenty of guile and gumption/intestinal fortitude. Also, his understanding/reading/assessment of events/situations was prescient; his timing was perfect.) ~ Shri Ram is integral to the Ramayana ('The Exertions of Shri Ram') and the face of the Suryavanshi/Sun-flag-bearing Raghukula/Raghuvansh (his clan, lineage), while Shri Krishn is at the heart of the Mahabharata ('The Great History of the Bharatas') and the face of the Chandravanshi/Moon-flag-bearing Yaduvansh. ~ Neither is susceptible to flattery; neither is boring, wooden or intimidating; their (immense/colossal) fame/stature/achievements/contribution sit lightly upon their shoulders, and they do not impose their godliness either. They don't flaunt it. That way, Sita and Rukmani, one can say, had the best of both worlds. ~ The reassurance/dependability, stability, emotional support/maturity, good humour and decency of a 'good guy' and the mischievous gentle rakishness/rakish charm (light/good-natured banter)/playfulness (not to be confused for abusive, violent or boorish behaviour; for purposes of comprehension let's say a happy mix of Gregory Peck and Cary Grant) coupled with a hint of intrigue of a 'bad boy'. [~ Good looks in a man are fine, but that would only give him a passing, artistic glance of appreciation. If he has an intelligent creative mind, a sparkling, amiably mischievous sense of humour and wit, combined with genuine warmth and kindness... that's when he would overturn the female mind. ... And, this (perhaps) also explains the trove of poetry involving Krishn.] ~ Both Ram and Krishn aremind-enchanting and exhilarating/enlivening (Krishn especially; he is magnetic); in fact, one would (even) be tempted to describe Krishn's effortless cool/charm and incredible charisma as mojo. ... Though Ram may not have been much different; after all both were one and the same - only the eras/yug differed, (and their actions/karm is linked to the challenges of the respective era/yug); the kind of guidance/reform/positive change (social and structural - big picture as well as micro level)/incremental change for sustained nation-building/introspection/transformation et al that was needed, the maze of complexities and 'cross-currents', the kind of humans there were/the nature of humanity in a specific era/yug (i.e. the quality of head and heart they possess, and so on - 'coz attitude and outlook as well as the 'way of life' too differs; also, e.g. the humans of Kaliyug cannot be compared to those of Dvapar or Treta: cognitive abilities fall, perception level is enveloped by a 'fog' of ignorance, apathy, delusion, and so on; Arya Dharma is at its lowest; hence, the end of Kaliyug is (also) called the most degenerate of all ages/yugs); besides, the kind of guidance that had to be given, the navigation through tortuous paths/events - so as to pull humanity/society out of quagmire, and so on. None of which is transient. [Instant change/transformation is fantasy; for organic transformation, it's the long haul. ~ Statesmanship leads to nation-building... but nation-building cannot bematerialized through magic wand, utopian idealism or self-righteousness; it requires (a cogent,collective and constant cycle of) karm yog: sweat, determination, tenacity/perseverance/endurance/forbearance, mettle, patience, harmony, a broader vision,far-sightedness (micro level + the larger picture), greatheartedness and hard work.] ~ Even great or accomplished humans would not have been able to do what they did. For example: Bhagirath may have been able to clear the terrain and (thereby) bring out the hidden River Ganga... and (thus) bring her waters to the whole of this land - solving the drinking water needs etc of the populace. But he may not have been able to change deeply-entrenched mindset and perceptions w.r.t. humans (e.g. adi-vasi and 'tritiya prakriti') - who were not considered as humans (hence, e.g. Hanuman-ji is depicted with a tail) - and mainstream them... 'coz no amount of legislation (or even royal decree) would have achieved this; - people tend to form their prejudices or perceptions by what they see and hear around them, they imbibe; and so, Bhagirath might (also) not have been able to generate acceptance for humans born via advanced IVF procedure, or guide and navigate through tortuous events a la Krishn.) BG 4.5: śrī-bhagavān uvāca (Sri Bhagavan said): || bahūni me vyatītāni janmāni tava cārjuna tāny ahaḿ veda sarvāṇi na tvaḿ vettha parantapa || ~ "O Arjun, many are the lives I have passed through and thou too. But I know them all, whilst thou knowest not." | BG 7.26: || vedaham samatitanivartamanani carjunabhavisyani ca bhutani mam tu veda na kascana || ~ "O Arjun, I know everything that has happened in the past, all that is happening in the present, and all things that are yet to come. I also know all living entities; but Me no one knows." ~ Hence Krishn was all-knowing. He also knew each soul (individual or human soul/jiva-atma). [~ Frankly, Krishn is such a sparkling, mesmerizing, riveting personage... no matter how much we write about him, it's still not enough. He's not transient/ephemeral; he's not shallow, he's not superficial, he's not cavalier. He 'turns the wheel of dharma and karm' (which would have stagnated); he 'absorbs'/soaks up 'toxin'/halahala (to 'cleanse'/to 'burn' human pettiness: to correct the course; to renew/re-energize; to help humanity ~ so that human society can function and progress). ~ However, wherever there is the union of purity and depth it produces the colour blue. Meghavarnam. The water of the seas and the sky - both are blue-hued. ~ And, since the Almighty combines both purity and depth or boundlessness... He too is (allegorically) 'blue-hued'. [It's a concept... to indicate His divine attribute/divinity.] 

~ Krishn is a most extraordinary figure: a leader, a hero, a legend, an enlightening personage, a guiding force, a karm-yogi, a transformational/renaissance figure, God in the flesh (the 8th Vishnu, svayam Bhagavan; the humanmanifestation [sagun swaroop] of Lord Vishnu/Narayan, His Purna Avatar)... and yet, an everyman; he's a Soldier-Statesman par excellence (soldier against despondency, pessimism, confusion, hopelessness, decay and so on). He was up against tremendous odds; sermons would have had no effect on the likes of Shakuni, Duryodhan et al. ~ The challenges at the end of Dvapar were manifold, and very different from those of Treta; humanity was different, ethical and social conditions were not the same either. Decay, indifference/impassiveness, inertia et al held sway. ~ Krishn's was the highest dharmic mission; and by his very appearance (karm + guidance), he reinvigorated/re-energized the principles of dharma (duty/action, even selfless action, for the benefit of humanity, for the greater good - to build a better society: dharma-samsthapanarthaya); he also urged (advised) humanity to introspection and action (karm) - to duty. [Dharma is not quite ethics or duty, it also means a constructive 'way of life'.] Krishn advised humanity to shake-off inertia and embrace karm yog. [There is no magic wand; thus, he also led by example and instructed through his own behaviour (acharan) - the mark of a true teacher/guru/mentor (but then, besides being the Cosmic Ruler He is also the Cosmic Teacher); this aspect/dynamism remains constant, be it the Ramayana ('The Exertions of Shri Ram'/ Shri Ram was a Reformer-Prince and Cakravartin) or the Mahabharata ('The Great History of the Bharatas'/ Shri Krishn was a Soldier-Statesman, but a Cakravartin by dint of his actions; his actions were for a higher cause - Loka-kalyana or Loka-sangraha: the greater/collective good. As a pathfinder his focus, tenacity and determination remains unwavering; he keeps the goals/objectives above himself.) ... Maybe, 'coz there is no alternative to karm yog (collective action/duty/responsibility, even selfless action/service to humanity/society) - to create/build [and sustain] a better society/civilization. This is his message/advise/mantra. ~ One needs to contemplate and deliberate deeply - to understand his purpose, his karm and his message/advise. Only then will it percolate.] ~ Instead of being active participants in their own destiny, humanity cannot become idlers and mere spectators/bystanders. ~ That will lead to a gradual all-round degeneration/degradation. This is the core of his message. (Thus, there is an organic interplay between finite and Infinite.) ~ Krishn is the Perennial Guide (Chir-Saarathy) - the (allegorical/metaphoric) shepherd to his flock. ~ There is no magic wand, no quick-fix, no instant solution; humanity will have to sort out their own issues - through collective effort, there is no one "out there" (a messiah figure) who will come and do it. They (avatars/empowered entities, maha-avatars/great incarnations and Purna Avatar/one in whom divinity is manifested fully) will guide and show the way - yes, however, there is no alternative to karm yog. ~ This has been the message of the Krishn-avatar (the 8th Vishnu). And this has also been the message of the Buddh-avatar (the 9th Vishnu/ Shri Gautam Buddh/Siddhartha was a Sage-Prince and the 'Enlightened One'). ~ Krishn also 'closed' Dvapar... and navigated through complex/tortuous paths/events to bring about the transition from Dvapar to Kaliyug... which commenced from midnight of 18 February in 3102 BC in the proleptic Julian calendar. [This is because he departed on this date. The period after his departure marks the beginning of Kaliyug. (Lord Narayan/Harih/Vishnu is the motive power and guiding force behind the mathematically precise universe. So, one can only wonder at the precision with which His maha-avatars work.) ~ Kali means bud. Thus, he was also a stabilizing force (a preserver) and a revitalizing force (Renaissance Man). ~ Only at the end of Kaliyug - when the metaphoric bud/flower withers away, will the 'Iron Age' (negative aspects of Kaliyug) be at its peak (i.e. ghor kaliyug): cognitive abilities fall, perception level is enveloped by a 'fog' of ignorance, apathy/indifference, delusion, stagnation, and so on; hence, it (the end of Kaliyug, that is) is (also) called the most degenerate of all ages/yugs). ~ A cycle of four yugs (Chatur-Yug) - whose lengths follow a ratio of 4:3:2:1 is also known as a 'Maha Yug' ~ Sat/Satya/Krita [Golden Age], Treta [Silver Age], Dvapar [Copper Age] and Kaliyug (Kali means bud/flower, but the end of Kaliyug is termed as 'Iron Age'/ghor Kaliyug). Thus, Kaliyug is the shortest of all eras/ages/yugs.]

Both Ram and Krishn (very likely) were fair-complexioned; Krishn is probably reddish-hued or crimson (Lohith/Rohitah or Rohit); coral lips (maybe deep-pink or the colour of red-coral); eyes shaped like lotus petals (maybe, big-eyed); head bedecked with peacock feathers (that would very likely be the headgear or crown); a chiseled appearance and a fascinating face (a reference to his good looks); a mischievous enthralling captivating smile. ~ What we can conclude is this: that Krishna was a figure of immense good looks, grace and splendor. [His features probably were a result of the delicate blending of the martian, saturnine, venusian and lunar characteristics. In other words: due to the dominance of the influences of the Moon and Venus, with Saturn and Mars.] Krishn is also known as: the master/lord of the senses. ~ He had not only gained mastery over his own senses (indriyas), but also over those of others. No wonder he is magnetic, riveting. ~ He is Trikalagya as well: a "bhuta-bhavya-bhavat-prabhu" or "The Master of all things that exist in the past, future, and present". ~ Possessor of the metaphoric Tritiya-Nayan: the Third-Eye. [As for Lohitah/Rohitah/Rohit: Red is the warmest and the most energetic colour in the spectrum. It stands for: energy, speed, strength, valour and purity. Purity means: doing what is right (~ leading to the larger good). Hence, Red is the symbol for a 'soldier'who strives for a better society.Rohit is also one of Shri Vishnu's many names. Krishn is svayam bhagavan, the humanmanifestation (sagun swaroop) of Lord Vishnu/Narayan.] ~ Peet or golden-yellow: Krishn is "Peetamber" - draped in the colour gold. It is also another name for Lord Vishnu/Narayan. "Peet" is golden-yellow and "amber" is sky. Hence, Peetamber also indicates the brilliant and glittering sky as well as enlightenment (as in: an illumined mind). Shri Ram is also known as Peetavasane (one who wears yellow attire signifying purity and wisdom. Here 'purity' means: doing what is right [~ leading to the larger good]). While the colour Blue also stands for: meditation/introspection, peace, tranquility, depth, stability, trust, loyalty, wisdom, confidence, intelligence, patience, decision-making and truth/dharma. | ~ However, post the decline of the Gupta era, Prabhakara Vardhana (of the Vardhana dynasty) and his sons (Rajya Vardhana and Harsha Vardhana) tried to consolidate the smaller and fragmented monarchies, independent kingdoms and feudatory states. Harsha Vardhana proved to be a distinguished ruler, (though not quite a Chakravartin)... but after him his empire disintegrated rapidly. [Though it is said he ascended the throne at the age of 16, however, given that the concept of time in Indian thought is very interesting, and involves planetary alignment, the cycle of lunar asterisms, and various other systems... a time gap between two consecutive years is imperative/cannot be ruled out.] ~ The absence of a Chakravartin was akin to a rudderless ship; also, it resulted in 'too many cooks spoil the broth'. [~ A Chakravartin, on the other hand, was way different w.r.t stature, character, calibre, vision and worldview vis-a-vis any influential/powerful big, medium or small satrap.] ... All sorts of 'manthan' commenced - for power, influence and other selfish and petty motives. The years were marked by a lack of intellectual stimulation, stagnation... and (eventual) decay. India lost her preeminence in all aspects and areas. This land was no longer the seat of innovation and learning. ~ Also, the feeling of oneness and internal unity despite the immense diversity (gradually) unraveled... fissures, schisms and fault-lines appeared/developed/came about; Arya Dharma and the social fabric woven around it too came apart; in the absence of a nucleus (a shared roadmap, vision) and a guiding and binding force/factor (a Chakravartin) - India went adrift. ~ The decline of Takshasheela marked the decline in Indian education, thought and structure. Fewer and fewer knowledge-seekers, students and travelers made the trip to India. [Now whether all of this - cumulatively - led to rote-learning or not ~ my guess is as good as yours.] ~ Earlier, the world looked to India for answers. The post-Gupta era India floundered... and (at best) looked elsewhere. Alas. ~ Bharatavarsha, "cherished land": the continent ('varsha'; Sanskrit) that is dedicated ('rata') to light, wisdom ('bha'). ["Bharat" did not mean rural India/hinterland.] ~ Also, ancient India was not confined to the contours of modern India. ... So, imagine the calibre and stature of the Chakravartin. 

Sanaatan Dharma is the name of a timeless/eternal and enlightened 'way of life' that is one with the World Spirit. Sanaatan Dharma was all about living in harmony with nature; worshipping the five elements of nature (PanchaBhuta or PanchaMahaBhuta or MahaPanchaBhuta) viz fire (agni), air (vayu), water (jal), earth (prththvi) and space/aether (aakash); performing one's karm yog/action (for the benefit of society/humanity); pursuit of knowledge; becoming higher spiritual beings - connecting with the Higher Self or seeking communion with the Universal Consciousness/Brahmn/Param-aatma, thus achieving 'Self-Realization' and Sat-cit-ānanda: eternal bliss (spiritual ecstasy, contentment) of self-realization, and so on. ~ Gradually, Sanaatan Dharma assimilated the concept of temples and worship of idols, courtesy the Greeks, and (perhaps) also the Buddhists. ~ Among the five elements of nature (PanchaBhuta or PanchaMahaBhuta or MahaPanchaBhuta) viz fire (agni), air (vayu), water (jal), earth (prthvi) and space/aether (aakash)... Agni (fire) has been the most worshipped. Agni also symbolically represents the spiritual fire of life and the processes of transformation. It is the foremost amongst purifiers. There are more hymns to Agni(dev) in the Rg Ved than to any other God/dev (here 'dev' indicates PanchaBhuta/the five elements of nature). Agni has been worshipped since time immemorial... throughout 'Aryavarta' ('Arya-lands' or 'land of Arya people/Aryans'; in other words, 'land inhabited by Arya people' - noble-natured people who followed a pattern of life based on noble/Arya tenets/values/principles. ~ Not that there was any do's and don'ts; Aryan-ness was simply their 'way of life'; they were inherently noble-natured.) ~ Agni Gayatri Mantra: || AUM Maha jwalaya Vidhmahe Agni devaya Dheemahe Thanno Agni Prachodayath || ~ AUM, Let me meditate on the great flame, O God of fire, give me higher intellect, And let the Fire God illuminate my mind. || AUM Vaiswanaraya Vidhmahe Laaleelaya Dheemahe Thanno Agni Prachodayath || ~ AUM, Let me meditate on the flame that digests/purifies, O merger of all, give me higher intellect, And let the Fire God (the foremost amongst the five elements of nature/PanchaBhuta) illuminate my mind. (Please also refer to paragraph #7 from the last in the previous portion/section - to know more about Agni). [Fire = auspicious effulgence, Light Divine. ~ Do read "Aaguner Paroshmoni" (one of the most beautiful Rabindrasangeet/Tagore-songs - mentioned earlier in this post) to get the full significance of why fire (agni) symbolically represents the spiritual fire of life and the processes of transformation, and why it is also considered as the foremost amongst purifiers. ~ Paroshmoni is the philosopher's stone which when touched... alchemically transmutes the baser nature to a divine one.] ~ Also, Agni does not indicate/signify "tyag"per se; Agni is the greatest of purifiers and the foremost amongst the five elements of nature - PanchaBhuta (also: PanchaMahaBhuta or MahaPanchaBhuta). ~ Agni signifies "tyag" in the sense (to indicate) one has conquered oneself; in other words: one has conquered/overcome the negativities residing in one's heart and mind. And thus, one has no desire for praise or glory; one's heart is larger than the universe itself and so, one's actions and thoughts are for the greater good and not glory seeking. It indicates that one has become a Siddha (i.e. attained the eternal bliss of self-realization). ~ On a separate note: "Hindu" is not the name of any "religion" or a set of religious beliefs whatsoever... but was simply a label for a specific landmass; at best the word simply implied someone associated with (or dwelling in) the geographical area the boundaries of which were roughly covered by the Sarasvati-Sindhu Rivers and their tributaries. ~ "Hindu" is simply the variant of Sindhu (the mighty River Indus, perhaps the largest of all rivers in the world after the Nile - Sanskrit: Nilah or Neel). ... The word "Hindu" came about courtesy the ancient Persians (another class of Aryans), who - due to a lack of appropriate phonetics (in their language) - called the people living around the River Indus, besides on the east of the River Indus (Sindhu) as "Hindu". ~ In Old Persian... the 'S' for Sindhu becomes 'H' (due to a lack of phonetics). Therefore: the Vedic Sapta Sindhavaḥ or Sapta Sindhu became Hapta HAndu. ~ Thus, 'Hindu' is derived from the Persian 'HAndu', which in turn is derived from 'Sindhu'. [Do look up the early part of this post - to get the drift.] ~ The people living around the River Indus, and on the east of the River Indus (Sindhu) followed a pattern of life that was distinct. Thus, "Hindu Dharma" is another name for "Arya Dharma". [Arya = noble; based on noble values, principles, and so on. Dharma = path or 'way of life'; Arya Dharma = a pattern of life based on noble tenets/values/principles... that resulted and/or contributed towards the greater good and therefore, a better society.] ~ Bharatavarsha, "cherished land": the continent ('varsha'; Sanskrit) that is dedicated ('rata') to light, wisdom ('bha'). ~ Bharatavarsha or Bharatadesha was another name for Aryavarsha or Aryavarta (land of Arya people). ~ However, ancient Bharatavarsha may not have been confined to the contours of modern India. 

Genesis of the name "India": In ancient times, the entire Indus river system (along with its seven tributaries - Sutudri or Satadru or SuturI (Sutlej), VipASa (Beas), AsiknI/Chandrabhaga (Chenab), ParuSNI (Ravi), VitastA (Jhelum) and the now-extinct River SarasvatI) and the area it covered, was called "Sapta Sindhu" (the Vedic Sapta Sindhavaḥ) i.e. the land of seven rivers ("Sindhu" means river,stream or ocean in Sanskrit). The word "Sindhu" not only referred to the river system and adjoining area but also became the label to denote the culture that had developed along its valleys. [The "Indus Valley Civilization" should more accurately be called the Sarasvati-Sindhu Civilization considering the landmass where it developed).] ~ Thus, courtesy the ancient Persians... to the world beyond, the area around the Sarasvati-Sindhu rivers and its culture came to be known as the area of "Hindus" (thus the name "Hindustan" which literally means the land of "Hindus". (Stan = land or place in Persian. Similar to Sthan in Sanskrit. ~ The similarity between "Stan" and "Sthan" is again due to theancient Avestan Persian-Sanskrit connection which go back a long way.) ~ This nomenclature stuck and became particularly prevalent after the arrival of the Mughals. The Mughals (based on the earlier Persian terminology) used the term "Hindu" to refer to the original inhabitants of the land and this label became the way to distinguish the indigenous/ancient culture from theirs. ~ When the Greeks first reached the river plains of the Punjab, they borrowed the name of the region (Hindu) from the Persians and simply modified it to "Indós". "Indós" later morphed into "Indus" in Latin - by which name the river is still known in the West. [The ancient Greeks referred to the ancient Indians as Indói, the people of the Indus.] The Romans began to call the whole landmass after this river and thus the name "India" came to stay ~ which has been the form used by Europeans over the ages.~ Thus the word "India" is derived from the Indus River.

[On a separate note: the "Sindhu" in our national anthem could be a reference to the River Indus. This song is dedicated/addressed to that "Bharata Bhagya-Vidhata" (Creator; dispenser; supporter of India's Destiny) ... who has (in Tagore's own words) from age after age held steadfast the reins of India's chariot through rise and fall, through the straight path and the curved. That Lord of Destiny, that Reader of the Collective Mind of India, that Perennial Guide ... is none other than the eternal charioteer (chir-saarathy): "Jana-Gana-Mana-Adhinayaka" (ruler/leader/captain of the minds of all people). ~ The complete five stanza of "Jana-Gana-Mana Adhinayaka..." composed/penned by the Universal Bard: link.]

[Note on Tagore:Rabindranath Tagore (aka Robi Thakur), the Nobel laureate poet, writer, and philosopher was one of the finest ambassadors of Indian/Eastern thought to the rest of the world. (Invitations came from all directions, and so... besides India, he toured Europe, the US, Canada, South America and Asia extensively. His travels also took him to Egypt. While in Japan he wrote: "The Japanese do not waste their energy in useless screaming and quarreling, and because there is no waste of energy it is not found wanting when required. This calmness and fortitude of body and mind is part of their national self-realization.") Tagore is also the first-ever Asian to be awarded with the Nobel Prize. ~ He is called "Bishwa-Kabi", which means the poet of the world and is sometimes also called "Kabiguru", which means the guru of poets. His genius enriched whatever it touched. ~ Gurudev was a versatile genius, a multifaceted personality: a social reformer, a thought-leader, a teacher/educator, a renaissance poet, a novelist, a playwright/dramatist, an essayist, an artist, a choreographer of dance dramas, a critic, a lyricist/music composer, a prolific painter and above all, a great humanitarian and philosopher. [His vast canon also included travelogues, sketches and doodles... and over 2000 songs.] ~ In 1909 Tagore began penning Gitanjali. In 1912, he journeyed to Europe for the second time. On way to London he translated some of his poems/songs from Gitanjali into English. He met William Rothenstein, a noted British painter and critic, (known for his lithographic portraits), in London. [Tagore had been introduced to Rothenstein in Calcutta (in 1910) during a gathering at Abanindranath Tagore's (Aban Thakur's) home.] ~ "Here was poetry of a new order which seemed to me on a level with that of the great mystics. Andrew Bradley, to whom I showed them, agreed: 'It looks as though we have at last found a great poet among us again,' he wrote." ... Needless to say, Rothenstein was impressed by the poems, made copies and gave to Yeats and other English poets. He also arranged a reading in his house where Yeats read Tagore's poems in front of a distinguished audience comprising of Ezra Pound, May Sinclair, and Ernest Rhys etc. ~Meanwhile, the India Society of London published Gitanjali ('An Offering of Songs') containing 103 translated poems of Tagore. Yeats wrote the introduction for this book and Rothenstein did a pencil sketch for the cover page. The book created a sensation in the English literary world. The serenity of Tagore's "Geetanjali" amazed European scholars. (Many of his poems are actually songs, and inseparable from their music.) ~ Tagore was touring America then... speaking at Rochester, Boston, and Harvard University. Ezra Pound's Poetry Magazine (published from Chicago) published the first English poem of Tagore. Six of his poems from Gitanjali appeared in Poetry Magazine in its December 1912 issue. Tagore returned to Calcutta... and on 13th November of 1913 Indians learned that the Nobel Prize for literature has been awarded to Tagore (for Gitanjali) "because of his profoundly sensitive, fresh and beautiful verse, by which, with consummate skill, he has made his poetic thought, expressed in his own English words, a part of the literature of the West."[In response Tagore conveyed his "... grateful appreciation of the breadth of understanding which has brought the distant near, and has made a stranger a brother."] ~ He was not often to escape the tumult and peace was to be his but at rare moments. ... Henceforth Tagore was to become a world-figure. ... Tagore's dignity and handsome presence, the ease of his manners and his quiet wisdom made a marked impression on all who met him. The young poets came to sit at Tagore's feet; Ezra Pound the most assiduously. Among others whom Tagore met were G. Bernard Shaw, H.G. Wells, Galsworthy, Andrew Bradley, Thomas Sturge Moore, and Robert Bridges. According to Rothenstein: "It was pleasant to see homage paid so readily to an Indian; nothing of the kind had happened before."~ W.B. Yeats described him, "Tagore was the product of a whole people, a whole civilization, immeasurably strange to us, and seems to have been taken up into this imagination; and yet we are not moved because of its strangeness, but because we have met our own image, as though we had walked in or heard perhaps for the first time in literature, our voice as in a dream". Tagore also met and interacted with Robert Frost, Helen Keller and Dr Karel Hujer (Astronomer). He and Werner Heisenberg, the discoverer of the famous Uncertainty Principle of quantum physics, had long conversations about science and Indian philosophy. ~ Not only Yeats and Ezra Pound and T. S. Eliot, not only Bernard Shaw and Bertrand Russel and Albert Einstein, but scores of other writers and intellectuals, and millions of more common folk, were touched in due course by this melodious Eastern sage (personality). [Sage personality should not be construed as renunciation; it was not his way. He delighted amongst all the hustle and bustle of life.]

Tagore credits several illuminating experiences from his childhood with shaping his life and establishing its creative direction. When he was learning to read at about the age of six, disconnected words suddenly came together as he encountered the rhyming phrase "jal parey/pata narey" (the water falls/the leaf trembles) in his spelling book. The rhythm of the words connected him for the first time with a harmonious creative dimension. ~ "I was no longer a mere student with his mind muffled by spelling lessons," he writes. "The rhythmic picture of the tremulous leaves beaten by the rain opened before my mind the world which does not merely carry information, but a harmony with my being. The unmeaning fragments lost their individual isolation and my mind reveled in the unity of a vision." ~ Tagore wrote poetry as an eight-year-old. At age sixteen, he released his first substantial poems under the pseudonym Bhānusiṃha ("Sun Lion")... and the next sixty-four years were marked by a torrential flow of creativity in manifold forms.

In the second decade of the last century Tagore was already beginning to be ubiquitous. André Gide (winner of the Nobel Prize in literature in 1947) translated his works into French, Boris Pasternak (who won the Nobel Prize in 1958) and Anna Akhmatova translated them into Russian. [In 1917 several Russian translations of Gitanjali (one edited by Ivan Bunin, later the first Russian Nobel Laureate in Literature) were available, and by the late 1920s many of the English versions of his work had been rendered into Russian by several distinguished translators.] W.B. Yeats had written the preface to the first edition of Tagore's own translation of the Gitanjaliin 1912, and Ezra Pound in a revised edition in 1913 compared him to Dante. Juan Ramón Jiménez, a Nobel Prize winner in 1956, seemed especially responsive to Tagore's idealism/humanism and sensitivity to nature's nuances, and who, in collaboration with his wife, Spanish-born writer and poet Zenobia Camprubi, produced Spanish versions of 22 of Tagore's titles. Pablo Neruda also translated some of his works. ~ Latin American literature was influenced by these developments. A number of litterateurs including the Nobel Prize winners - Mexican poet Octavio Paz and Chilean poet Gabriela Mistral came under the spell of Tagorean magic. But few in this continent were as deeply moved (by the great Indian) as the legendary Chilean poet Pablo Neruda.

Pic:Albert Einstein and Rabindranath Tagore at Einstein's Berlin home. |One was an Indian polymath and Nobel laureate with white flowing beard, piercing eyes (and intelligent and cerebral looks). The other was the world famous scientist, with frizzy hair and unkempt appearance. ~ When Rabindranath Tagore and Albert Einstein met in New York, it was a media sensation. They were two celebrities. It was wisdom from the east meeting philosopher of the west. They were staged together as icons by the media even earlier. ~ They first met in Berlin in 1926 and several times later in 1930. The first meeting that year, at Einstein's summer home in the vicinity of Potsdam, resulted in The New York Times headline, "Einstein and Tagore Plumb the Truth: Scientist and Poet Exchange Thoughts on the possibility of its Existence without relation to Humanity." The piece described Tagore as "the poet with the head of a thinker" and Einstein as "the thinker with the head of a poet." Their brief meeting in late 1930 in New York, when Einstein was en route to Caltech, bore the photo caption: "A Mathematician and a Mystic meet in Manhattan." ~ Considering these events, it's not hard to imagine just how famous Tagore was in the West. ... With his works impressing the likes of William Butler Yeats and Ezra Pound, Tagore lectured to packed audiences around the world. ... However, tackling heady topics like free will versus determinism, the two titans stood poles apart philosophically. Einstein believed the world had a reality independent of the human mind. Tagore countered, saying, "This world is a human world." For him, the world depended upon human consciousness for its reality. ~ However, the issue they discussed is one of the most stimulating, intellectually-riveting conversations in history: [Tagore: You have been busy, hunting down with mathematics, the two ancient entities, time and space, while I have been lecturing in this country on the eternal world of man, the universe of reality.] -Tagore and Einstein and When Einstein Met Tagore

This difference in their philosophy, thinking and outlook probably stemmed from the fact that for Tagore science did not signify a mechanistic analysis of facts, but rather a broader interpretation, a wider perception of the universe. Tagore (and even Acharya Jagadish Chandra Bose) conceived Nature not merely as a physical phenomenon, but a living spirit, which could help man/humanity to realize the essential Truth of Life. ~ Tagore showed a keen interest in scientific knowledge and discoveries. ... To both Tagore and Bose, there never existed any rigid distinction between science and poetry or more broadly between science and literature. Critiquing the typical Western attitude of making excessive specialization in the field of learning, they sought to locate an underlying unity in all branches of knowledge, to find a 'comprehensiveness of truth', which is the core of Eastern philosophy. 

The Tagorean magic touches our core - the heart as well as the mind. It touches our very soul. There is forever the primordial in him. It is life he celebrates; that the universe is a pattern of ever-widening ripples and experience is the insistent falling of the rain on monsoon nights. In his songs there emerges all the brilliance of the universe as it goes through a dawning somewhere deep within time and space. ... And so you hear the gentle tones of tumi daak diyechho kon shhakaley / keu ta jaane na: link. ~ Here is Mahabishwe Mahakashe: link; Arup tomar bani: link; Mor Bina Othe: link; Aakash bhara surjo taara: link (it expresses a sense of deep "wonder" in the universe); Tumi kemon kore gaan karo heye guni:link; Aloker ei jharna dharaye dhuiye dao:link;Mor bhabonare ki haowaye matalo:link1/ link2; Anando-loke Mangal-aloke:link. ~ Tagore's portrayal and celebration of a higher power embedded in the fabric of the universe and responsible for its continuing existence and operation is very fascinating, indeed. According to him: 'aamare tumi ashesh korechho, amon-i leela tabo...' (tr. Thou hast made me endless, such is thy pleasure/leela. ~ Though 'pleasure' is not an equivalent translation of the word 'leela' - essentially the interplay between finite and Infinite; between created and Uncreated; between evanescent and Eternal). Robi Thakur was a "Sadhaka"; his songs were his "Sadhana" ~ not in the sense of limiting him, but lifting him up to meet the Super-personal Man/the universal human spirit. He also said: 'gaaner bheetor diye jakhon dekhi bhuban-khani takhon taare chini...' [~ He acknowledged (as only he could) that he begins to comprehend the Cosmic Person/Super-personal Man/the universal human spirit (which he believed lay behind everything in the universe/cosmos - visible and invisible); that he begins to understand His serenity, divinity, creativity, vision, insight, guidance, tranquility, compassion, greatness, magnanimity, boundlessness... and so on - through his songs. ~ He is convinced that there is an organic relationship between finite and Infinite.] ~ As you recite his poetry or sing his songs, you remain aware of certain inalienable truths. And they are pretty simple ones as well. The universal bard speaks to you through the turnings in the seasons. In your turn, you speak to him; absorb his sentiments as it were. The result is a harmonious whole. ... And harmony, balance and integrity are what Gurudev has consistently focused on. ~ Think of Jagorane Jaay Bibhabori (link) or sheemar majhe ashim tumi / bajao apon shur (Within the finites, you the Infinite play your own tune - link). ~ It is a song that takes you closer to Creation, indeed imbues you with thoughts of the ties that bind you to your Creator. [~ Do also read the Tagore-Einstein conversation/discussion to understand this wonderful Tagore-song (Rabindra-sangeet).] ~ In Tagore, it is the gentle and the tranquil that flows through the leaves of the trees. The poetry is the breeze. | Tagore was a passionate Indian, but his nationalism transcends into universalism; his philosophy of humanism is enriched with the tranquil touch of internationalism ~ where one may find a unique blending of the best of the East and that of the West. He was an Indian by birth but a world citizen by his perception. India in Tagore's vision is the pilgrimage (pilgrim centre) of world humanity as she is the great synthesizer and unifier in the midst of manifold differences through centuries. ... His poetry with its message of harmony, universalism and humanism is an eternal light-house to mankind. 

Tagore was forward-looking. He believed in the synergism between spirituality and reason; he was spiritual as well as a genuine science enthusiast; he was not a mystic (despite his appearance - white flowing beard and attire). He also had a voracious mind - he possessed an extraordinary depth of knowledge and could hold his own on a variety of topics. [It's a common misconception that science and arts are two mutually exclusive spheres and one cannot excel in both. Tagore proved it wrong, as did Einstein with his interest in music and literature.] ~ A widely-traveled man... Tagore was a curious and keen observer of socio-political life in the numerous countries he visited. He was a citizen of the world. ~ He believed in an intellectual union of world cultures; his vision was to take on a more holistic attitude towards understanding the dynamic spirit of his time (and beyond). He was critical of the excesses and exploitation of colonial rule; however, he also distrusted "narrow domestic walls" and hollow arguments ("the dreary desert sand of dead habit")... and recognized the importance of what India could learn - from other nations/cultures. ~ Tagore emphasized on education - knowledge and intellectual curiosity (as opposed to rote-learning). "These solidly complete Universities over which our country is brooding, are like hard boiled eggs from which you cannot expect chickens to come out." ~ His luminous/timeless oeuvre (which is notoriously difficult to translate... without letting go of much of its enigma/subtlety/nuance and flavour) cannot be pigeonholed. His thoughts/philosophy/viewpoint appears to be disarmingly simple... although it is simultaneously simple and infinitely complex to understand. The more one reads, re-reads and re-re-reads, the more one discovers, re-discovers and re-re-discovers. ~ But then, discovering and even rediscovering legends and towering figures hardly comes with an expiry date (it is part of "ever-widening thought...").]

A masculine river is called "Nad", a feminine one "Nadi". However, of all the Vedic rivers, the Sindhu is both masculine and feminine. Incidentally, the Sarasvati is (also) called "she with seven sisters" (saptasvasā), indicating a group of eight rivers, probably the (missing river is) KubhA. ~ Rivers, such as the Sapta Sindhu ("seven rivers"), play a prominent part in the hymns of the Rig Veda. Perhaps it was around these rivers that the Rigveda (and maybe, much of the other Vedas/Book of Knowledge or Book of Enlightenment was written. Veda comes from the root 'Vid' which means, "to know").] The Saptarishi (from saptarṣI) or the seven-enlightened/learned beings are regarded in the Vedas as the progenitors of the Vedic way of life. [The Sapta Rishi are the Hierarchy working under the guidance of the Highest Creative Intelligence, God/the Almighty/Lord Narayan; they are (also) the Great Well Wisher of the Universe, connecting humans and Gods (Higher Beings; devas, demi-gods, etc.)] ~ The Big Dipper asterism is also called Saptarshi. Astronomically, the Saptarishis' abode is recognized in the form of the Big Dipper or Ursa Major constellation and it always revolves around the Dhruv-Loka or Pole Star. ... Thesummit of Mt Meru (in Shambhala) is believed to align to the wheeling constellation of Ursa Major (the Sapta Rishi Mandala or the Constellation of the Great Bear/sapta-riksha), the Seven Stars that circle the Pole (Dhruva Loka?) 

~ On a separate note, our ancients possessed astonishing imagination. They even described celestial events (involving stars, constellations, and so on) through stories, paintings and verses - making them sound like real humans, animals, etc. [Maybe the stories involving Shiva and Mohini or the birth of Kartik or the birth of Anjaneya (Hanuman-ji) for that matter are three such examples. Therefore, taking them literally or at face value will be misleading.] In fact, the ancient Romans and Greeks too were well-known for similar narrative styles and techniques. [~ Lord Narayan/Vishnu/Hari is not an earthly entity, though he has numerous manifestations. And, from what we can gather, Shambhu Nath/Sankara is very likely one of his many human manifestations. ~ Lord Krishn/Hari-Krishna is depicted extensively in the Indus seals... indicating that not only were the ancient Indus people familiar with him but also worshipped him.]

~ See the similarity between the Indus seal illustration of Mother Goddess standing on an elephant and fighting tigers (above) and the sky map (in pic). In the sky map constellation Ophiuchus forms the body of mother Goddess and Hercules forms the head. The constellation Sagittarius forms the elephant. One notable point here is that Jyotisha Vedanga states that the "elephant tusk" is the symbol of Sagittarius constellation (Serial no-20 in Jyotisha Vedanga Table). Further Scorpius constellation is shown as associated with Indra as per the detail available in Jyotisha Vedanga (Serial no-18 in the Jyotisha Vedanga table). ~ Further the tail of Scorpius constellation has been given the symbol of "Elephant goad". All these pointers indicate that the Ophiuchus constellation was one of the prime constellations in Indus valley period as well as the Vedic period. Note that mother goddess standing on elephant has been gradually transformed into male God/deva (Indra) over a period of time. ~ Another important point to be noted here is that the "wheel" shown above the head of mother goddess is the Draco (Dragon) constellation with pole star in the centre of the wheel. ~ Very likely, these constellations helped those ancient people (including sailors) in determining the direction during nighttime or while at sea. Maybe the constellations were akin to a magnetic compass.

Pic: The first Indus Valley seal found at Harappa in 1872. | Notes on the Sindhu-Sarasvati Civilization:First discovered in 1920-1921 at Harappa by Rai Bahadur Daya Ram Sahni, the Indus Valley Civilization came to be known as Harappa Civilization. The city was well-planned (with a well organized civic, economic and cultural system) and divided into two parts: citadel (raised portion) and lower part. ~ To even think that over five thousand years ago a highly civilized community flourished in the region! [... Though fresh sites are still being unearthed, adding insight into the rich culture of the Harappan civilization. ~ Some of the most striking aspects of the discoveries are the town-planning and architecture, art and crafts and the social, cultural and economic condition of that era. Much has been known about the town-planning and architecture of the Harappan civilization.  The cities boasted of well-planned roads - wide and straight, houses provided with an efficient drainage system and ventilation.] ~ Like other great discoveries, the discovery of the Indus Valley civilization was grounded and shaped by the personal and professional experiences and interests of the various characters - ranging from the brilliant Rakhaldas Banerji to the tragic Luigi Pio Tessitori ­as also the institutional circumstances of those times. ~ In about 1920 there was enough interest in the site of Mohenjo-daro for the archaeologist Rakhal Das Banerji to excavate there. In the first season Banerji's team found the remains of a large city built mainly from baked brick. However, they did not know when it might have been built or who might have built it. Banerji's team found objects such as weights, beads and finely painted pottery. Perhaps the most important finds were small square seals like the ones found at Harappa in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. ~ Excavations continued throughout the 1920s and 1930s with several teams of excavators. During this period, the site was divided into different areas. Each area was given a 'title' based on the name of the archaeologist working there. In doing so, they began uncovering a civilization so vast in its extent that at its peak it is estimated to have encompassed a staggering 1.5 million sq km - an area larger than Western Europe. In size, it dwarfed contemporary civilizations in the Nile Valley in Egypt and in the Tigris and Euphrates valleys in Sumer (modern Iraq). Its geographical boundaries are now believed to extend up to the Iranian border on the west, Turkmenistan and Kashmir in the north, Delhi in the east and the Godavari Valley in the south. [Even extending to Rupnagar, in India, at the foot of the Shimla Hills 1,000 miles (1,600 km) to the northeast.] ~ Two things are clear: That Indus Valley was a misnomer and that in size it was the largest prehistoric urban civilization - even bigger than Pharaonic Egypt. That it was governed much like a democracy (collectivism) and the Indus people were the world's top exporters. [Between around 3500 BC and 2000 BC, people in the Indus Valley built more than 100 towns. The largest were Mohenjo-Daro (situated on the right bank of the River Indus, excavated in the year 1922 by Rakhaldas Banerjee) and Harappa (situated on the left bank of the river Ravi/ParuSNI), with populations of 40,000-50,000. These towns had large granaries, brick houses, public baths, elaborate drainage system, and streets laid out in neat grid patterns. Farmers grew wheat, barley, cotton, and rice on land fertilized by yearly Indus River floods. They also raised animals. In towns, people made cloth, pottery, metalwork, and jewelry. On the coast, they went abroad to trade.] ~ A recent count showed that as many as 1,400 Indus sites have been found, of which 917 are in India, 481 in Pakistan and one in Afghanistan. While Mohenjodaro and Harappa were rightly regarded as principal cities, there were at least several others such as Rakhigarhi in Haryana and Ganweriwala (on the dry river bed of the Ghaggar-Hakra) in Pakistan's Punjab province that match them both in size and importance. Other important sites are: Dholavira (in Gujarat), Banawali (in Haryana), Kalibangan (in Rajasthan - excavated in the year 1953 by A. Ghosh), Lothal (in Gujarat - excavated in the year 1957 by S.R. Rao and M. S. Vats) and Mehrgarh (in Baluchistan: 7000 BC - c. 2500 BC i.e. 9000 AD; believed to be one of the world's oldest cities... it represents the long-lasting early spring [and not quite the high summer] of the Indus Civilization). [There's also Chanhudaro- one of the bigger sites and a city with no citadel (raised portion) - first excavated by Nani Gopal Majumdar in March, 1930 and again during winter field session of 1935-36 by the American School of Indic and Iranian Studies and the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston team led by Ernest John Henry Mackay.] 

[Pic:Necklace Harappan Civilization, Indus Valley III-II millennium BC. ~ This agate necklace consists of beads of different shapes and sizes from archaeological sites of Harappa in the Indus Valley civilization. The Harappan civilization produced the finest agate and carnelian beads.] | Indus jewelry, ornaments, etc:The jewelry in gold and silver - bangles, necklaces and other ornaments are well-crafted. They are well-finished and highly polished. Tools of stone, copper and bronze have been found. The discovery of a large number of spindles of various sizes indicates that threads both of cotton and woolen must have been spun in those days. Spindle whorls made of pottery, shell and faience have been found. Both men and women wore ornaments. While necklaces, fillets, armlets and finger-rings were common to both, women also wore girdles, earrings and anklets. Ornaments were made of gold, silver, copper, ivory, precious and semi-precious stones, bones and shells etc. From archaeological findings it appears that the Harappans were conscious of fashion. Different hairstyles and beards were in vogue. Cinnabar was used as a cosmetic and as face-paint; lipstick and collyrium (eye-liner) were also known to them. The main diet consisted of wheat, barley and milk products. Fruits, vegetables, fish and meat were also consumed. Music and dance appear to be the main sources of entertainment. Agriculture was their main occupation. [Were they also agripreneurs? Did they convert waste to energy? ~ My guess is as good as yours.] Rainfall was heavy. There is evidence of the cultivation of wheat, barley, peas, mustard, cotton and rice. Domesticated animals were kept in the house. Horse bones have also been discovered at Surkotda, indicating use of the animal. (Besides, the various unicorn seals, described in the earlier portions, too indicate a familiarity with the horse. ~ The unicorn may have numerous symbolism attached to it, however, without knowing about the horse... the ancient Indus people could not have simply imagined it.) 

Pic: Necklace from Mohenjo-daro made from gold, agate, jasper, steatite and green stone (lizardite or grossular garnet). ~ The gold beads are hollow and the pendant agate and jasper beads are attached with thick gold wire. Steatite beads with gold caps serve to separate each of the pendant beads. [This necklace fragment is only half of the original ornament which was divided between India and Pakistan in 1947.]  

Pic:This collection of gold and agate ornaments includes objects found at both Mohenjo-daro and Harappa. ~ At the top are fillets of hammered gold that would have been worn around the forehead. The other ornaments include bangles, chokers, long pendant necklaces, rings, earrings, conical hair ornaments, and broaches. Such ornaments were never buried with the dead, but were passed on from one generation to the next. 

Glazed tiles:The technique of glazing blue-green tiles using recipes that are very similar to those used by the Indus craftsmen is still practiced in many centers throughout the Indus valley. The term faience comes from a kind of brightly-colored glazed earthenware. Called the "first high-tech ceramic", faience is a siliceous vitrified and glost ceramic, made of a body of fine ground quartz or sand, coated with an alkaline-lime-silica glaze. It was used in jewelry throughout Egypt and the Near East beginning about 3500 BC. Forms of faience are found throughout the Bronze Age Mediterranean, and faience objects have been recovered from archaeological sites of the Indus, Mesopotamian, Minoan, and Egyptian civilizations. Faience was an important trade item during the Bronze Age; the artisans of Indus Valley, Egypt, and Mesopotamia were developing glazes and faience using several different techniques by 2600 B.C.


Faience ornaments:A collection of faience ornaments from Harappa has been discovered. The Harappans developed a very compact glassy faience that was produced in a variety of colors, ranging from white, to blue green, deep blue and even red-brown. On the left is a disc shaped ornament of blue green faience. Parallel ribbing of light blue green alternates with white paste in the bottom of each groove. This unique ornament may have been sewn onto cloth or inlaid onto a metal ornament. At the top center is a bead made of red-brown and white faience. This bead is possibly an imitation of the bleached carnelian eye beads. The fragments on the lower right are banded with dark blue and come from small jars, possibly used to hold perfume or medicines.

[Pic: Ancient Indus jewellery. ~ Fired steatite was an important material used in many different types of Indus jewelry. Steatite beads are found in all four necklaces in the center of this collection of jewelry from Harappa and Mohenjo-daro.] ~ Jewelry making in the Indus Valley dates back to the Neolithic-age Mehrgarh culture (7000-5500 BC), and Late Harappan age, which predates the iron-age development of metal-casting and metal working. The Indus Valley region, which encompasses (ancient) Persia and the Indian sub-continent, was home to the Indus-Sarasvati civilization (Aryan/Harappan/Vedicpeoples of Aryavarta or Brahmavarta; essentially 'people of the Indus') that were the largest (both by population and geography) of the major ancient civilizations from Egypt, Mesopotamia and China. The Sarasvatiwas a river praised in the Rig-Veda (a collection of Vedic Sanskrit hymns), running the length of the Indus Valley, from the Punjab to the Arabian Sea. ~ Early Indus Valley jewelry consisted of strands of simple beads that were carved from soft stone, or fashioned from shells. The Harappans were expert craftsmen, making beads from agate, amethyst, carnelian, lapis lazuli (a precious stone prized since antiquity for its intense blue color) and turquoise. Some stones were heated to produce a reddish color that was prized by the early Indus civilization. During the Late Harappan period craftsmen began to work with bronze, copper, silver, and gold, fashioning simple necklaces, head-bands, bangles and other ornamentation from cast metalwork, glazed faience (a non-clay ceramic), terracotta, shells, and carved ivory. Copper was mined locally (by the Harappans) in Baluchistan and Rajasthan. [Minerals, unavailable from the alluvial plain, were sometimes brought in from other parts. Gold was imported from southern India or Afghanistan, silver and copper from Afghanistan or northwestern India (Rajasthan), lapis lazuli from Afghanistan, turquoise from Iran (Persia), and a jade-like fuchsite from southern India.] Examples of this early jewelry can be seen on the cast-bronze statuette of the 'Indus dancing girl' believed to be dated around 2,500 BCE. ~ The Harappans were also accomplished sailors and navigators, helping them to expand the boundaries of trade to Bahrain and Sumer. For navigation, the Harappans carved compasses from conch-shell, which they used to measure the angle between stars. ~ Jewelry was also made in the form of anthropomorphic symbols such as animals and trees, maybe due to their nature worship rituals and spiritual beliefs in the Mother Goddess. Jewelry was not buried with the deceased, but passed on to their heirs. [~ Discovery of a large cache of gold and other ornaments reportedly belonging to the Harappan period (2600-1900 BC) by the villagers of Mandi in the Muzaffarnagar District of UP (in the year 2000) has challenged previous notions about the geographic reach of the Indus Valley civilization. Scholars from the ASI and the state's Department of Archaeology (DoA) visited the site and declared the jewelry to be Harappan. Gold and silver bangles, gold beads, and agate and onyx beads all resemble jewelry found in Indus Valley sites such as Harappa and Mohenjo-daro and at Lothal, Rakhigarhi, and Dholavira in India. Two copper containers, one circular in shape and the other rectangular, were also recovered; the rectangular container measures 16.5 inches long and was perhaps used for holding gold fillets. It is the first time that such a large cache of gold jewelry has been recovered in UP. Visiting scholars found late Harappan pottery at the site. Excavations conducted in the vicinity at Hulas in Saharanpur district, Alamgirpur and Bargaon in Meerut district have all yielded similar Indus Valley material; this shows that the civilization stretched far and wide.]

An index to an advanced stage of trade, and its essential element, the recovery of this balance and weights from Mohenjo-Daro suggests that Harappan settlers not only pursued systematic trade activities but also had in prevalence weights and measures ensuring accuracy, consistency, transparency and fairness of trade-system and commercial behaviour. Far ahead of the primitive measuring vessels of bartering goods... Harappan settlers maintained consistent standards of weights and regularized weights' based pricing system. Though re-fabricated, this balance is estimated to be about four-and-a-half-millennium old. These finds attest with great certainty the advanced stage of trade amongst Harappan settlers. 

[Pic: Cubical weights in graduated sizes. ~ These weights conform to the standard Harappan binary weight system that was used in all of the settlements. The smallest weight in this series is 0.856 grams and the most common weight is approximately 13.7 grams, which is in the 16th ratio. In the large weights the system become a decimal increase where the largest weight is 100 times the weight of the 16th ratio in the binary system. These weights were found in relatively recent excavations at Harappa and may have been used for controlling trade.] ~ The recovered weights range from the heavier ones with lifting rings attached to those of micro-miniaturized sizes used probably by jewelers for weighing precious metals, jewellery items and perhaps some rare and scarce spices. Harappan settlers seem to have had a decimal system in use for defining higher weights as also for measuring lengths. It seems some central authority controlled and ensured adherence to strict standards and fairness in trade and commercial activities. A large number of small rectangular blocks - both cubical and cylindrical made of tawny chert and marked with light grey bands, have been excavated from Harappa and Mohenjo-daro. Archaeologists have identified these blocks as weights. Interestingly, all these finds are well-finished and have polished faces. Occasionally they also have beveled edges, though none of them bear an inscription or mark indicating a weight and value. Along such weights Mohenjo-daro excavations have also revealed a copper balance.

[Pic: Seals and sealing. Long rectangular seals and a terracotta sealing (bottom) with Indus script. ~ The top seal has seven signs of Indus script. The back of this seal is convex and it is perforated from the side. The central sign may represent a house or place of worship and is a symbol that is often repeated on seals with horned deities seated in yogic position.] | For building houses, baked bricks were used extensively at Chanhudaro and Mohenjo-daro. Several constructions were identified as workshops or industrial quarters and some of the buildings of Chanhudaro might have been warehouses. Evidence of shell working was found at Chanhudaro and bangles and ladles were made at this site. Harappan seals were made generally in bigger towns like Harappa, Mohenjadaro and Chanhudaro that were involved with administrative network. Copper knives, spears, razors, tools, axes, vessels and dishes were found, inspiring this site to be nicknamed as "Sheffield of India" by Earnest Mackay. Copper fishhooks were also recovered from this site. Terracotta cart model, small terracotta bird (which when blown acts as a whistle), plates, dishes were found. Indus Seals were also found at Chanhudaro (which is considered as one of the centres where Seals were manufactured). The scale of craft production at Chanhudaro seems much greater than that at Mohenjedaro, perhaps taking up half of town for this activity. An impressive workshop, recognized as Bead Making Factory, was found at Chanhudaro, which included a furnace. Shell bangles, beads of many materials, steatite seals and metal works were manufactured at Chanhudaro. Sesame, which is a native of South Africa, is known from a number of Harappan sites, including Chanhudaro, probably grown for oil. Peas were also grown at Chanhudaro. Cotton cloth traces preserved on silver or bronze objects were known from Chanhudaro, Harappa and Rakhigarhi (in Haryana). Objects of Iron were reported from Chanhudaro, Ahar (Rajastan, India) and Mundigak and this gains importance as it has been claimed that Iron was produced in 3rd Millennium in South Asia Region.

[Pic: Burial of adult man, Harappa. ~ The body may have been wrapped in a shroud, and was then placed inside a wooden coffin, which was entombed in a rectangular pit surrounded with burial offerings in pottery vessels. The man was buried wearing a long necklace of 340 graduated steatite beads and three separate pendant beads made of natural stone and three gold beads. A single copper bead was found at his waist. The most prominent pendant bead is made of a rare variety of onyx with natural eye designs in alternating shades of red, white, tan and green. Gold beads were placed at each end to frame this important ornament. The other two stone beads were made of banded jasper and turquoise, with a single gold bead at one end of the turquoise bead. ~ The Indus people buried their dead in wooden coffins along with many pottery vessels, that were probably filled with food for the afterlife. Most individuals, both male and female were buried with some simple ornaments, such as shell or copper bangles and agate beads. Elaborate ornaments of gold, silver and precious stones were never included in the burials and must have been inherited by the living relatives.] | Indus experts homed in on the Rg Veda. Many of its hymns mention a sacred river called Sarasvati, describing it as the foremost of rivers, big as the ocean, rising in the mountains and flowing between the Yamuna and Sutlej (Sutudri or Satadru or SuturI) before entering the sea. But in later Vedic hymns it is no longer described as mighty. In the '70s, when Braj Basi Lal, a former ASI director-general, began excavating Kalibangan, a site in the desert sands of Rajasthan, he was amazed to find evidence of a field of crossed furrows dated to around 2900 BC, preserved by a strange quirk of nature. Looking around he found that farmers in the region used a similar ploughing technique even after 5,000 years. The ancient houses had tandoors (earthen ovens) similar to ones found in kitchens in the villages in the area. As Lal says, "It was as if the present was the past and that despite the passage of time not much had changed." ~ Extensive study of skeletal remains in the region showed that the people were in good health and, more importantly, there was a diverse mix of population just as at the present. ~ The conclusion: we had unity in diversity even then! [... That the Indus was indeed the nucleus of the civilization's growth is fairly certain. However, given the vastness of the Indus civilization, the first casualty is the earlier notion of Harappan homogeneity. It is clear that there was tremendous regional diversity just as we have in modern India.] ... And that this assemblage of people was originally from the subcontinent itself, they did not come as migrant hordes from Central Asia. [So, was the Indus Valley Civilization or the Sindhu-Sarasvati Sabhyata the oldest civilization in the world? ~ My guess is as good as yours. ... Was the Shivalik... enclosing an area that starts almost from the Indus and ends close to the Brahmaputra too part of where it all began? ~ Where civilization began. Where much of creation began. Who can say? ... Shivalik means 'tresses of Shiva'; perhaps our ancients named this range after the dreadlocks of Sankara/Shambhu Nath. ~ Who can say?] ... New evidence from several sites show a remarkable continuity of culture over a period of 2,000 to 3,000 years before the Indus Valley peaked. Dholavira, for instance, shows the existence of small farming and pastoral villages on the same site before it was transformed into a bustling metropolis. [Besides, the same kind of burnt brick appears to have been used in the construction of buildings in cities that were several hundred miles apart. The weights and measures also show a very considerable regularity, suggesting that these disparate cities spread out across vast swathes of land shared a common culture. ~ Although there is a general unity in style and symbol over this vast area, there are specific regional styles too. The manufacture of symbols is also slightly different for each region. The unified character of this culture continued for almost 700 years, after which there is evidence for a gradual trend towards regional styles (ca. 5000-2600 B.C).] The Harappans took the great leap from self-contained agricultural societies to a trade-oriented, luxury-conscious, sophisticated, urban civilization that gave the world the concept of town planning. Analyzing the evidence from various sites archeologists found that between 2600 BC and 2500 BC, the Harappans experienced a century of cathartic changes. A tremendous jump in human ability is evident. [This transformation could not have been sudden, it probably happened gradually - organically - over a period of 100-200 years. ~ So what or who caused it?] The beginnings of village farming communities and pastoral camps were reported as early as 7000 to 5000 BC. But developed farming communities, which grew wheat and barley, emerged around 4300 BC. ~ So much for the assiduously-built fiction about 'Aryan blitzkrieg' - that (supposedly) wiped out a glorious civilization, plunging India into the dark ages for over a thousand years.

[Pic:"Priest King". ~ Fillet or ribbon headband with circular inlay ornament on the forehead and similar but smaller ornament on the right upper arm. The two ends of the fillet fall along the back and though the hair is carefully combed towards the back of the head, no bun is present. The flat back of the head may have held a separately carved bun as is traditional on the other seated figures, or it could have held a more elaborate horn and plumed headdress. Two holes beneath the highly stylized ears suggest that a necklace or other head ornament was attached to the sculpture. The left shoulder is covered with a cloak decorated with trefoil, double circle and single circle designs that were originally filled with red pigment. Drill holes in the center of each circle indicate they were made with a specialized drill and then touched up with a chisel. Eyes are deeply incised and may have held inlay. A short-combed beard frames the face, (the upper-lip is neatly shaved). ~ Soft limestone was used to carve small sculptures of deities or important people.] ~ P.S:But then, how did the term/nomenclature "Priest King" come about? Was it to indicate "Rajarshi" [Raja + Rishi]? ~ A non-extravagant just and benevolent ruler, a well-wisher of the people (Hitesh)? Or did it indicate "Purohith" - someone (a ruler/king/chief) who worked for the good (hith) of the entire "pur" or "pura" (region/place); someone who endeavoured for its all-round progress. [... And, did this word "purohith" later give rise to "priest"... with a change of meaning, of course? ~ My guess is as good as yours.] 

~ There appears to be a completely organic process of growth that threw up the Harappan culture, as we know it. [On pottery on many of the smaller sites graffiti similar to some figures on the script begin to appear. And at Dholavira (in Gujarat) and at Banawali in Haryana, the distinction between the citadel and the lower city is beginning to evolve. There is, however, a huge jump in scale in such activity in those critical 100 years.] Dholavira, for instance, shows the existence of small farming and pastoral villages on the same site before it was transformed into a bustling metropolis. The beginnings of village farming communities and pastoral camps were reported as early as 7000 to 5000 BC. But developed farming communities, which grew wheat and barley, emerged around 4300 BC. In a site called Mehrgarh near the Bolan river in Balochistan province, there are signs of agricultural surplus with the establishment of community storage silos. In Kunal in Haryana, archaeologists found what are known as proto Indus seals. In Harappa as in most Indus sites, the distinct gridiron pattern for streets appear, a scientific system of drainage that linked up to even the smallest house in the lower city is established, precise weights and measures (including decimal system) begin to circulate, and the writing system evolves. As well as the bullock-cart technology that the Indus people had perfected. Archaeologists say the Indus people couldn't have copied their town-planning from Egypt and Mesopotamia because in those civilizations the roads meandered like village streets. Nor was the writing similar to Sumer's cuneiform or the Egyptian hieroglyphics. The Harappans had their own distinctive style. Lal explains the dramatic change as a result of centuries of growth reaching a critical mass that caused an unparalleled urban explosion. Trade, he believes, was the driving force of the revolution/metamorphosis. ~ It all was indeed an expression of the ancient Indian genius.

Pic: Swastika design on seal from Mehrgarh.


Pic: Huge Mehrgarh Polychrome Figural Vessel, Indus Valley. c. 2500 BC.

Pic: Mehrgarh Bichrome Figural Pot, Indus Valley, c. 3rd millennium BC. ~ The pot painted with a register of numerous small ibex above large bulls within vegetation and linear bands. Some lime deposits attesting authenticity.

Pic:Mehrgarh Bichrome Oil Lamp, Indus Valley, c. 3rd millennium BC. ~ Of four-pinch square form, the pot painted with geometric designs on the outer rim. Some lime and soot deposits attesting authenticity.

Pic:Indus Valley Civilization'Lipped'Oil Lamp: Ceramic, 37.67 grams, 68.68 mm rim. Circa 2600-1900 BC. ~ Elliptical bowls are a characteristic artifact from the Indus Valley civilization, from sites such as Mohenjo-Daro and Harappa. These oil lamps are provided with a lip to receive a wick. The fabric is very fine terracotta with few micaceous inclusions, with a creamy-tan slip to reduce the porosity.

Pic:Libation vessels. ~ Libation vessels made of the conch shell (marine shell) Turbinella pyrum. One of these is decorated with vermilion filled incised lines. A single spiraling design is carved around the apex and a double incised line frames the edge of the orifice. This type of vessel was used in later times for ritual libations and for administering sacred water or medicine to patients

Pic:Indus Terracotta Bowl. Circa: 3500 BC to 2500 BC.


Pic:Indus Terracotta Vessel. Circa: 3500 BC to 2500 BC.

[Pic: Painted burial pottery from Harappa. ~ The two larger vessels were found in the same burial. The other smaller vessels were found in an earlier burial and represent an older style of pottery. ~ Tall jar with concave neck and flaring rim:The rounded base was originally supported in a ring stand. The black painted geometric designs are arranged in panels with a red slip as background. After initial firing, the entire painted design was obliterated with a red slip and fired again at a low temperature that turned the exterior layer of the slip red through oxidation, but the inner layer remained gray. This overslip was not well bonded to the previously slipped surface and was partially eroded when first discovered. After initial conservation and documentation, one half of the overslip was removed to reveal the original painted design. The lid and ring stand with this vessel were also covered with an overslip. This tall jar was located at the foot of the burial pit for burial.] | The excavation of Lothal, an Indus port-town located off the Gujarat coast, created waves. It shattered notions that the Indus was a landlocked civilization, conservative and isolated, and as a result sank without a trace. Excavations (by Rao) uncovered a dock 700 ft long - even bigger than the one currently at Visakhapatnam. It took an estimated million bricks to build it. Next to the dockyard were massive granaries and specialized factories for bead-making. Hundreds of seals were found, some showing Persian Gulf origin, indicating that Lothal was a major port of exit and entry. ~ Indus seals were found both in Iraq, where the ancient Sumer civilization flourished, and in the Persian Gulf. ... The Sumers (Sumerians) apparently called India "Meluha", and their inscriptions talk of how they purchased beads of various kinds, timber, copper, gold and ivory crafts from India. It was evident that the goods were upmarket and purchased by the Sumer royalty. Indus sailors appear to have discovered the trade winds long before Hippolus, and their maritime interests were vast. "Harappan traders were among the most enterprising," says Jagat Pati Joshi, another former ASI director-general, who discovered Dholavira. Gold, for instance, was carted from distant Karnataka, and then hammered into delightful chains to be exported to Sumer. A lapis lazuli bead factory discovered in distant Shortugai in Afghanistan is believed to have been a major supplier to Harappan traders. [Lapis lazuli has been mined in the Badakhshan province of Afghanistan for the last 6,500 years, and trade in the stone is ancient enough for lapis jewelry to have been found at Predynastic Egyptian sites, and lapis beads at neolithic burials in Mehrgarh, the Caucasus, and even as far as Mauritania.] ~ Like modern-day Indian businessmen, the Harappans had a huge domestic market to cater to. The climate around that time was conducive for growing a variety of crops in the region. Harappans are credited with being the earliest growers of rice and cotton. The agricultural surpluses ensured craft specialization. And, at its peak, the Indus was dotted with over 300 cities of varying sizes, supported by hundreds of towns and villages, which supported a cottage industry. Quality standards seem to have been strictly observed, resulting in uniformity of arts and craft. And the flourishing trade was an energizer that powered Indus' phenomenal growth in the middle of the third millennium BC. It brought prosperity that saw the cities provide their citizens with the finest of drainage systems and reservoirs to supply water. And helped them evolve into one of the greatest civilizations ever. [~ What does seem clear is that the important sites were commercial centers. They are on rivers or near the coast. Various specialized manufacturing facilities suggest that they were heavily involved in trade with each other and far outside the region.]

[Pic: Various Indus seals.(Many of the seals have narrative scenes that appear to represent deities and ceremonies. Some were ornamental, some for administrative and trading purposes. Maybe some of the seals were also made to commemorate festivities, important events (even celestial events), history, and personages; while a few of them [probably] served to keep dates (Indus calendar, perhaps?)| [Dholavira (on the salty marshes of the Rann of Kutch in Gujarat) was a well-planned city with broad roads, a city centre, a town with residential houses, and open spaces and stadiums for markets and fairs. It is one of the two largest settlements in India and the fourth or fifth largest in the subcontinent. Dholavira enjoys the unique distinction of yielding an inscription of ten large signs of the Harappan script: indeed the oldest sign-board of the world. A variety of funerary structures is yet another feature of exceeding importance throwing new light on the socio-cultural beliefs, thereby indicating the presence of composite ethnic groups in the Indus population of Dholavira. [Archaeologist Ravindra Singh Bisht says: "Exploring Dholavira is like opening a complete book on the Indus. We now have answers to some of the most enduring riddles about the civilization." For starters, Indus town planners are not as "monotonous" and "regimented" as archaeologists had us believe. In Dholavira they display a surprising exuberance that expresses itself in elaborate stone gateways with rounded columns apart from giant reservoirs for water. ~ While experts regard Dholavira as the most exciting Indus find in recent times, archaeologists have excavated or are in the process of digging up 90 other sites both in India and Pakistan that are throwing up remarkable clues about this great prehistoric civilization. ~ It is both a revelation and a revolution. What they have been uncovering is turning accepted notions on the Indus on their heads.] ~ Lothal (Gujarati for "mound of the dead"), on the other hand, was a flourishing city, connected to the sea at the Gulf of Cambay and there was active trade with Egypt, Mesopotamia and Persia. One can find ruins of neatly laid-out residential blocks, a township, a marketplace, and roads, public baths, drains and wells. Thousands of objects that reflect the daily life of the people have been excavated such as toys, utensils, beads, pottery, seals, weights and measures. [A possible fire altar indicates that the Harrapans may have worshipped Agni. The ruins of a fire-altar suggest that the people of Lothal worshipped Agni along with the sea god.] The people of Lothal made significant and often unique contributions to human civilization in the Indus era, in the fields of city planning, art, architecture, science, engineering and culture. Their work in metallurgy, seals, beads and jewelry was the basis of their prosperity. A coastal route existed linking sites such as Lothal and Dholavira to Sutkagan Dor on the Makran coast. Lothal's dock - the world's earliest known, connected the city to an ancient course of the Sabarmati river on the trade route between Harappan cities and the peninsula of Saurashtra when the surrounding Kutch desert of today was a part of the Arabian Sea. It was a vital and thriving trade centre in ancient times, with its trade of beads, gems and valuable ornaments reaching the far corners of West Asia and Africa. The techniques and tools they pioneered for bead-making and in metallurgy have stood the test of time for over 4000 years. ~ Archaeological finds from the excavations testify to trade with ancient Egypt and Mespotamia. The hydraulic knowledge of the ancient Harappans can be judged by the fact that boats could dock at Lothal in the 1850's. In 1942 timber was brought from Baruch to nearby Sagarwala. It is said that then the dockyard could hold 30 ships of 60 tons each or 60 ships of 30 tons each. This would be comparable to the modern docks at Vishakapatnam. ~ A fascinating fact is the existence of two more cities underwater in the sea nearby, which are as elaborate and advanced. ... The planned urban city of Mehrgarh, one of the oldest structured settlements ever known was discovered and excavations begun by a French team led by Jean-François Jarrige and Catherine Jarrige; the site was excavated continuously between 1974 and 1986. Mehrgarh was equipped with water supply, sanitation, markets, and shops. The most unique discovery is the first known origin of dental surgery and related medicinal activities exercised in the Mehrgarh area. [Dental caries (or cavities) are the result of sugars and starches in the food we eat. Hunter-gatherers, who rely on animal protein, do not generally have cavities.] It is also one of the earliest sites with evidence of farming (wheat, barley, maize and dates) and herding (cattle, sheep and goats) in south Asia. The artisans were very skilled particularly in sculpture and jewelry-making, as well as in metal-casting. The oldest ceramic figurines in South Asia were found at Mehrgarh. It was also some sort of a centre for manufacturing various figurines and pottery; there are evidences of well-equipped workshops. An abundance of ornaments and jewelry have been found. Figurines of bronze and terracotta: women and animals, baskets, tools, beads, bracelets, pendants and necklaces too have been discovered. Most of the jewelry found are made of precious stones such as lapis lazuli, carnelian, agate, turquoise, shells and pearls. [Maybe the lapis lazuli and copper came from the mountains of Afghanistan; agate and carnelian from Gujarat; and shellfish and pearls from the southern coast of Pakistan on the Arabian Peninsula.] 

Pic:Early Indus Valley tabular disk beads. Period: Indus Valley Culture - most probably 3300-2800 BC. ~ If you look at the Indus beads below, you will see that they all still have marks of pecking even though they have been after polished on a grinding stone. 

Pic:Photo from an excavation find from Bhirrana (a Harappan site in Fatehabad district in Haryana) where you can see the same disk beads. 

[Pic: the potsherd with the engraving.]Also:In a rare discovery, the Archaeological Survey of India has found at Bhirrana, a red potsherd with an engraving that resembles the Indus 'Dancing Girl,' the iconic bronze figurine of Mohenjo-daro. While the bronze was discovered in the early 1920s, the ASI discovered the potsherd with the engraving during excavations in 2004-05. A few hundred kilometres separate Mohenjo-daro and Bhirrana. The potsherd, discovered by a team led by L.S. Rao, Superintending Archaeologist, Excavation Branch, ASI, Nagpur, belonged to the Mature Harappan period. Mr. Rao called it the "only one of its kind" because "no parallel to the Dancing Girl, in bronze or any other medium, was known" until the latest find. He goes on to say, "... the delineation [of the lines in the potsherd] is so true to the stance, including the disposition of the hands, of the bronze that it appears that the craftsman of Bhirrana had first-hand knowledge of the former." ~ Mr. Rao called Bhirrana an "exemplary" and "paradigmatic" site that stood out on two more grounds. For the first time in the post-Independence period, artifacts called Hakra ware, belonging to the pre-early Harappan period, were found as independent, stratified deposits at Bhirrana. This and other discoveries established the presence of an unbroken cultural sequence at Bhirrana: from the Hakra ware culture and its evolution into early Harappan, early Mature Harappan and Mature Harappan until the site was abandoned. ~ The discoveries of these periods include underground dwelling pits; house-complexes on streets; a fortification wall; bichrome pottery; terracotta cups; arrowheads, fish-hooks and bangles, all in copper; incised copper celts; terracotta toy-carts and animal figurines; and beads of semi-precious stones. Seals made of steatite of the Mature Harappan period were found. They have animal figures such as a unicorn, a deer with wavy antlers, a bull with outsized horns, and an animal with three heads - of a deer, a unicorn and a bull. The seals also have typical Harappan legends on them. All these were found during excavations in 2003-04, 2004-05 and 2005-06.

Pic:The dock, with a canal opening to allow water to flow into the river, thereby maintaining a stable water level. |More on Lothal:the cradle of the subcontinent's oldest civilization; the cradle of Aryan civilization in the sub-continent. ~ Lothal, literally "Mound of the Dead" (in Gujarati), is the most extensively excavated site of Harappan culture in India, and therefore allows the most insight into the story of the Indus Valley Civilization, its exuberant flight, and its eventual decline and subsequent diversification. ~ Once a sleepy pottery village, Lothal rumbled awake to become a flourishing centre of trade and industry, famous for its expertly constructed system of underground sanitary drainage, and an astonishing precision of standardized weights and measures. Lothal passed through all the phases of society; from earliest development to most mature. At the height of its prosperity, it not only survived but also was strengthened by three floods, using the disaster as an opportunity to improve on the infrastructure. The fourth flood finally brought the settlement to the desperate and impoverished conditions that indicated the end of a once-glorious civilization. ~ Lothal began as a small village on the Sabarmati river, inhabited by people using "red ware" micaceous pottery (similar to today's terracotta), during the Chalcolithic era. Sea-faring merchants, and later the potters, masons, smiths, and seal-cutters of the Indus Valley Civilization, established a colony at Lothal circa 2450 BC, bringing with them their tools, technology, crafts, and expanded sea-borne trade. Lothal soon became an industrial center, one of the southernmost outposts of the Indus Valley Civilization, and (also) its most important port. ~ Around 2350 BC, after all the houses were destroyed by severe floods, the people of Lothal rallied together, or perhaps were led by someone, to not only rebuild the town, but also to improve on it. They strengthened the walls of the fort, raised the level of the town, built an artificial dock, possibly the first in the world, and an extensive warehouse. A hundred and fifty years later, after the next floods, they again came together to reconstruct the town into a larger city. After the third severe flood circa 2000 BC, many inhabitants left the city to move to higher and safer regions.  When the city was again completely submerged around 1900 BC, what is known as the Mature Harappan period gave way to the Late Harappan Period. Farmers, artisans, and fishermen gradually returned in the hope of rebuilding their lives, but the urban center could never be regenerated. Result? ... The populace lived in poorly constructed reed huts, with no drainage, and perhaps even a return to illiteracy. Yet, somehow, the civilization continued here till the 16th century BC, long after it had disappeared from the northern provinces. Gradually the town was abandoned and silted up over the next few centuries. ~ Dr. S. R. Rao's excavation of the site from 1955-62 provided the most exhaustive study of Harappan culture in India from artifacts and structural remains such as: #1. Earthenware: strong large ceramic jars, human and animal figurines, as well as toys and games-figures. #2. Copper and stone tools: in beautiful designs of human and animal figurines, often of bulls. #3: Seals: Lothal holds the third largest collection of seals and sealing, engraved on steatite, with animal and human figurines and letters from Indus script, but these remain undeciphered, so they do not provide as much insight into the material culture as the other findings. They do however show aspects of the spiritual culture; there are signs of fire worship, and of worship of the sea goddess, but not of the mother goddess. [So, maybe, stories of Shambhu Nath as well as the Shiva-Parvati story (gradually) came in with people/migrants from the Harappa-Mohenjo-daro/Meluhhan areas.] #4. Beads: Lothal had a highly developed bead-making industry that has not been surpassed even by the modern Cambay craftspeople working 4000 years later. Lothal was famous for its micro-beads that were made by rolling ground steatite paste on string, baking it solid, and then cutting it with a tiny saw into the desired lengths. The expertise is evident in the micro-beads of gold under 0.25 mm in diameter that cannot be found anywhere else. #5.Weights and measures: despite the vast area over which the Harappan culture spread, it developed an extraordinarily precise system of weights and measures, standardized across the civilization, represented in the local materials at Lothal. #6. A network of underground drainage: there were also 12 private paved baths on the upper town. These show a remarkably forward thinking concern for hygiene and sanitation. #7. Dock and warehouse: The dockyard allowed ships to sluice from the sea, and expertly constructed lock gates allowed them to float while loading or unloading their cargo. Apparently the dockyard could, at that time, hold 30 ships of 60 tonnes, or 60 ships of 30 tonnes, a capacity comparable to that of the modern docks of Vishakapatnam. The dock allowed sea trade with West Asia, in particular, to expand greatly. 

[Pic: Seal, Kalibangan.] |Notes on Kalibangan:It is almost as large as Harappa and Mohenjodaro, and designed on the same plan. Discovered by A. Ghosh (director-general of the Archaeological Survey of India), this site, is of archaeological significance because it contains both pre-Harappan and Harappan remains; and therein can be seen the transition between the two cultures. Excavations reveal that Rajasthan had been an important centre of the ceramic industry. The paintings on the ancient pottery bear close affinity and resemblance with the Harappan designs. The remains include a cemetery and a fortified citadel. Small, mud plastered ovens closely resembling present-day tandoors have been also been excavated at Kalibangan, an Indus Valley site. Kalibangan is also identified as being established in the triangle of land at the confluence of Drishadvathi and Sarasvati Rivers. Luigi Tessitori at this site first identified the prehistoric and pre-Mauryan character of Indus Valley Civilization. The Archaeological Survey of India published Kalibangan's excavation report in its entirety in 2003, 34 years after the completion of excavations. The report concluded that Kalibangan was a major provincial capital of the Indus Valley Civilization. Its unique fire altars and "world's earliest attested ploughed field" distinguish Kalibangan. [~ The excavation unexpectedly brought to light a two-fold sequence of cultures, of which the upper one (Kalibangan I) belongs to the Harappan, showing the characteristic grid layout of a metropolis and the lower one (Kalibangan II) was formerly called pre-Harappan but now it is called "Early Harappan or antecedent Harappan". Other nearby sites belonging to Indus Valley Civilization include Balu (Haryana), Kunal (Haryana), Banawali etc.] B.B. Lal, former DG of ASI, said: "Kalibangan in Rajasthan has given the evidence of the earliest (c. 2800 BC) ploughed agricultural field ever revealed through an excavation." It has been found south east of the pre-Harappan settlement, outside the fort. "Kalibangan excavations in present western Rajasthan show a ploughed field, the first site of this nature in the world. It shows a grid pattern of furrows, placed about 30 cm apart running east-west and other spaced about 190 cm apart running north-south, a pattern remarkably similar to the one practiced even now." Even today, similar ploughing is used for two simultaneous crops in this region, esp. of mustard and gram. For preservation, this excavated ploughed field area was refilled after excavation and concrete pillar posts marked the area.

[Pic:Kalibangan Seal; Commemorative Stamp. Issue date: 14/12/1961; denomination: 0.90.] | ~ Kalibangan lies along the left bank of the dried-up bed of river Ghaggar (Ghaggar-Hakra River). It comprises of three mounds, the larger one in the middle, the smaller in the west and the smallest in the east. The excavations brought to light grid layout of a Harappan metropolis, perhaps truly 'the first city' of the Indian culture heritage. The significant part of the evidence, however, relates to the discovery of an early-Harappan settlement, immediately underlying the occupational remains of the Harappan citadel. The pre-Harappan settlement was a fortified parallelogram, the fortification wall being made of mud-bricks. The houses within the walled area were also made of mud-bricks. The distinctive trait of this period was the pottery, which was significantly different from that of the succeeding Harappans. An outstanding discovery was a ploughed field, showing a cross-grid of furrows, the southeast of the settlement outside the town-wall. This is perhaps the earliest ploughed field excavated so far. During the Harappan period, the structural pattern of the settlement was changed. There were now two distinct parts: the citadel on the west and the lower city on the east. The former was situated atop the remains of the preceding occupations to gain an eminence over the lower city, which was laid out on the natural plain towards the east. The citadel complex was a fortified parallelogram, consisting of two equal but separately patterned parts. The fortification was built throughout of mud-bricks. The southern half of the citadel contained some five to six massive platforms, some of which may have been used for ritual purposes. The northern half of the citadel contained residential buildings of the elite. The lower city was also fortified. Within the walled city, was a gridiron plan of streets running north-south and east-west, dividing the area into blocks. The houses were built of mud-bricks, baked bricks being confined to drains, wells, sills, etc. Beside the above two principal parts of the metropolis, there was also a third one, situated 80 m east of the lower city. It consisted of a modest structure, containing five (Vedic) 'fire-altars' similar to those found at Lothal (indicating worship of 'Agni') and as such could have been used for ritualistic purposes. Of the finds obtained from this excavation, a cylindrical seal and an incised terracotta cake are quite significant. The cemetery of the Harappans was located to the west-southwest of the citadel. Three types of burials were attested:extended inhumation in rectangular or oval grave-pits; pot-burials in a circular pit; and rectangular or oval grave-pits containing only pottery and other funerary objects. The later two methods were unassociated with skeletal remains. 

B. B. Lal, former DG of ASI, says: "Kalibangan in Rajasthan ... has also shown that there occurred an earthquake around 2600 BC, which brought to an end the Early Indus settlement at the site." This is perhaps the earliest archaeologically recorded earthquake. At least three pre-historic earthquakes affecting the Indus Valley Civilization at Dholavira in Khadir have been identified during 2900-1800 BC. Robert Raikes, an Italian hydrologist, has argued that Kalibangan was abandoned because the river dried up. Prof. Lal supports this view by asserting: "Radiocarbon dates indicate that the Mature Harappan settlement at Kalibangan had to be abandoned around 2000-1900 BCE. And, as the hydrological evidence indicates, this abandonment took place on account of the drying up of the Sarasvati. This latter part is duly established by the work of Raikes, an Italian hydrologist, and of his Indian collaborators." 

Banawali:earlier called Vanavali, it is on the left banks of dried-up Sarasvati River; Banawali was built over upper middle valley of Sarasvati River. Artifacts recovered: S-shaped jars, cooking vessels, ovens, tandoors, painted earthen pots etc. Painted motifs include, peacocks, pipal leaves, tree, deer, star, fish flowers, intersecting circles, checker board patterns, honey comb patterns. Harappan seals carrying pictures of Rhinoceros, wild goat, ibex, unicorn, and composite animal with tiger body. Gold, copper, bronze pieces: gold beads, copper, lapis lazuli, bangles of shells etc. The pottery found, is comparable with Harappan pottery in fineness and pottery assemblage is very similar to assemblage of Kalibangan.

[Pic: Indus Dancing Girl. ~ One of the rarest artifacts world-over, a unique blend of antiqueness and art indexing the lifestyle, taste and cultural excellence of a people in such remote past as about five millenniums from now, the tiny bronze-cast, the statue of a young lady now unanimously called 'Indus dancing girl', represents a stylistically poised female figure performing a dance. Though a small work of art, it is impressive and surpasses in plasticity the heavily ornate terracotta figurines. ... The statue is suggestive of two major breaks-through, one, that the Indus artists knew metal blending and casting and perhaps other technical aspects of metallurgy, and two, that a well-developed society of Indus people had innovated dance and other performing arts (maybe also dramatics, plays, verses and even story-telling) as modes of entertainment.]  

~ Dancing, painting, sculpture, and music (there is evidence of drums and of stringed instruments) were all part of their culture. Possibly drama and puppet shows/puppetry too, judging from a number of masks. |Pic: Miniature mask from Mohenjo-daro. ~ The peaceful face is made from a mold and thumb impressions from pressing the clay are visible on the back. The mouth is somber and the long almond-shaped eyes are open. The short horns arch from the top of the forehead and two long ears lay against the horns. Two holes on either side allow the mask to be attached to a puppet and/or used as a decorative piece.  

Pic: A board game, a probable ancestor of the game of chess, has been unearthed at Lothal, Gujarat. [~ Chaturanga (Sanskrit: caturaṅga) - an ancient Indian strategy game, (and the common ancestor of the board games chess, shogi, makruk, xiangqi and janggi) was developed during the Gupta era (around the 6th century AD). In the 7th century, it was adopted as shatranj in Sassanid Persia, which in turn was the form of chess brought to late-medieval Europe. Caturaṅga and shatranj - the tonal similarity is due to the Avestan Persian-Sanskrit connection.]

Pic: Dice (or maybe some other board game, such as a precursor to ludo) from before 2000 BC, made from stone and used in games by Indus people.

A wide variety of toys have been discovered... fashioned with exquisite care. ~ This culture seemed to have a love of children.

~ The Harappans were expert craftsmen. They excelled at stone-carving, complex weaving and carpet-making, inlaid woodwork and decorative architecture. They engraved with remarkable artistry their famous seals, mostly in steatite (or soapstone); those seals, over 3,000 of which have been found, seem to have served various purposes: some commercial, to identify consignments to be shipped, some for administrative purposes, some for internal trade, and some ritual or spiritual (maybe to invoke deities); some for commemorative purposes, maybe. Statues are not abundant, but refined, whether in stone, bronze or terracotta. They carved ivory and worked shells into ornaments, bowls and ladles; they cast copper (which they mined themselves in Baluchistan and Rajasthan) and bronze for all types of tools, domestic objects and statues (such as the famous Indus "dancing girl"); they also worked silver and gold with great skill, specially for ornaments. They made beads of carnelian, agate, amethyst, turquoise, lapis lazuli, etc.; they manufactured bangles out of shells, glazed faience and terracotta. ... And, of course, they baked pottery in large quantity - to the delight of archaeologists and history buffs alike, since the different shapes, styles, and painted motifs are among the best guides in the evolution of any civilization. ~ Especially since most objects made of cloth, wood, reed, palm leaves etc., usually vanish without a trace, especially in hot climates.

~ "Hariyuppa" or "Hariyupiyah" mentioned in the Rg Veda, is taken to mean Harappa. [~ And as we know, Hari indicates Lord Vishnu/Narayan.] ~ Also, is Mohenjo-daro (meaning: "Mound of the Dead") and/or the whole of Indus Valley Civilization the original Meluha (very likely meaning: the 'Radiant City') - courtesy the ancient Sumerians? ~ My guess is as good as yours. [In Sumerian language, 'alu' means city. 'Melu' means 'bright'. 'Melam' means 'radiance' or 'Nimbus'. Therefore, 'Meluha' would mean: the 'Radiant city'.] ~ Did "Persia" evolve from "Parshva" (meaning: 'next door', 'neighbouring' or 'nearby')? Did the ancient Indus people call the people of the first/neighbouring port by the Sanskrit word "Parshva"? Did the ancient Persians in turn (also) refer to the ancient Indus people and/or those living east of what is now Mohenjo-daro as "Prachya" or "Poorvi" (meaning: 'Eastern' or 'of/from the East' or Eastern Country)? ~ My guess is as good as yours. ~ But then, that would have been so fitting. ... "Poorvi" would mean the dawn of civilization. It would have also meant: from the East where the sun rises! | ... On a separate note, what constituted Praesii? Were Praesii and Pataliputra one and the same? But then, Praesii is said to have been very prosperous... the capital being Palibothra, a very large and wealthy city, after which the people themselves were known as Palibothri. Apparently, Palibothra was located (from the north-west) before the Ganges-Yamuna confluence. ... But Pataliputra or modern Patna lies southeast of the confluence. So was Praesii (of the Greeks) Prachya, which in Sanskrit means Eastern country? ~ Megasthenes' Palibothra may not have been located in Eastern India. So, what areas did he refer to by the city of Palibothra, the country of Praesii and the river Erannoboas? [~ Did he indicate the Sindhu Pulindakas by any chance?] ... Megasthenes was reasonably familiar with the places he visited in (ancient) India. Apparently, "The Indus skirts the frontiers of Praesii". ~ But then, which River Indus is being referred to? Was it the river Indus or some other minor river of the same name? ~ According to Classical accounts the river Jomanes flows through Palibothra into the Ganges between the towns of Methora (Mathura) and Carisobaras. Therefore, was Palibothra, the Prasii/Praesii capital... situated near Mathura? ~ Palibothra may not have been Pataliputra. So was there an ancient kingdom in the Madhyadesa region that tallied with Megasthenes' description of Palibothra? Was the country of Prabhadraka, Prabhadra or Palibhadra/Paribhadra, (part of Madhyadesa from the Mahabharata times) same as Megasthenes' Palibothra? ~ There is also reference to a king called Chandraketu (as the head of the Prabhadraka Kshatriyas). Now was this Chandraketu the Sandrokottas of the Greek accounts? ~ In which case, the Bhadraka kingdom or Paribhadra and its people, the Paribhadrakas or Palibhadrakas would be the Palibothra and the Palibothris (respectively) of Megasthenes' accounts. So Palibothra could well be Paribhadra instead of Pataliputra. [But who then was Sandrokyptos? Who was Sasicottus? And who was Xandramas?] ~ Magadha (the Prachya, "Easterners," Greek, Prasioi) had attained a dominating position; it probably consisted of eastern U.P., Bihar, possibly Jharkhand, Bengal, Assam and Orissa. ~ However, were there two Prachya/Prachyadesa, just like there was two Kambojas (actually three, if we consider Kambuja Desa or modern Cambodia)? ~ My guess is as good as yours. | Megasthenes' Herakles was not the classical Greek deity per se. ~ During his travels (as the ambassador of the Seleucids) during the reign of Samraat Chandragupta Maurya of the Maurya Empire/Dynasty... Megasthenes came upon an Indian deity, a fascinating figure... and equated him with the classical Greek divinity, Herakles. This Herakles was none other than Krishn or Hari-Krishna. Megasthenes also described an Indian clan called Sourasenoi, who especially worshipped 'Herakles' in their land, and this land had two cities, Methora and Kleisobora, and a navigable river, the Jobares. ... As was common in the ancient period, the Greeks sometimes described foreign deities/gods in terms of their own divinities, and there is little doubt that the Sourasenoi refers to the Shurasenas or Shurasena Yadus, a branch of the Yadu clan/kula (the ancient clan/lineage of Harikula or Harivansh) to which Krishn belonged; Herakles to Krishna, or Hari-Krishna; Mehtora to Mathura; Kleisobora to Krishnapura, meaning "the city of Krishna"; and the Jobares to the River Yamuna. ~ Quintus Curtius also mentions that when Alexander confronted Porus (Puru or Raja Paurava/Parvateshvar)... Porus' soldiers were carrying an image of 'Herakles' in their vanguard. ~ The all-conquering Alexander's career pretty much came to a halt... after his brief encounter with this mighty king of the Indus region. [The Greeks however had some success ruling as kings in northwestern cities such as the one in Takshasheela... the decline of which marked the decline in Indian education, thought and structure.] Subsequent events heralded the advent of the Chanakya-Chandragupta duo. [~ Thus, the so-called Macedonian empire in the east lasted less than ten years after the invasion.] ~ However, what about Sarakene? And, who really were the Sarakenoi or Saraceni? Did this word evolve from Late Latin Saracēnus or from Late Greek Sarakēnos? Or, did it have anything to do with the Shurasenas/ Shurasena Yadus (i.e. Megasthenes' Sourasenoi)? Were they an offshoot? Did the name Shurasena (or Sourasenoi for that matter) undergo some variation due to change in phonetics? ... And, since they were opponents of the Roman Empire, did the Romans characterize them as 'barbarians'? ~ My guess is as good as yours.

[Pic: The Pashupati Seal. ~ This seal depicts a yogi, probably Lord Shiva (Sankara/Shambhu Nath/Rudra-Siva?) ... A pair of bull horns crowns his head. [The bull or Vrisha in the Sanatan Dharmic thought represents "Dharma", justice as well as actions that benefit society and humanity.] A rhino, a buffalo, an elephant and a tiger surround him. Under his throne are two deer. ~ This seal shows that Shiva was worshipped and he was considered as the Lord of animals (Pashupati).]

[Pic: Indus script/glyphs.]However, since the above seal depicts a three-faced figure wearing bullhorns, let's take another look at the seal. The yogi pose: Vishnu-Krishna is also known as the Supreme mystic. (The other Indus "Yogi Seal" has been discussed earlier in this post.) ~ The three faces could be indicative of the cosmic "Satyam-Shivam-Sundaram": Lord Narayan/Hari/Vishnu. ~ Also, Vishnu-Krishna (as Vrishakapi or Vrisha Uttamam i.e. Supreme Bull/Dharma) is associated with Vrisha (the Bull); the bull or Vrisha is associated with "Dharma" - justice as well as actions for the larger good, in Sanaatan Dharmic thought. [Please read the earlier portion of this post - for more details on Vrisha, etc.] ... The bullhorns indicate an important personage (maybe signifying puruṣa-uttama: greatest of all beings, or maybe, Vrisha-Uttamam - Supreme Dharma). The Indus seals show script/figures/glyphs of fish, tortoise, wheel/chakra, Swastika, peacock, eagle, arrow, conch-shell, peepal/aśvatthaḥ tree, peepal leaves, and "V" shaped alphabets/glyphs. ~ All of which are associated with Lord Narayan/Vishnu/Harih. Besides, Hariyuppa (or "Hariyupiyah") is indicative of "Hari" (i.e. Lord Narayan/Vishnu). ~ Therefore, could Hariyuppa (or "Hariyupiyah") be the ancient Indus peoples' version of Haripura ("the city of Hari")? "Pur" or "pura" indicates place/city as well as fort, and the Indus cities were well fortified. ~ My guess is as good as yours. ... So, could this seal, popularly known as the "Pasupati Seal", actually be a depiction of Lord Narayan/Vishnu/Hari - the patron figure/personage/deity of the ancient Indus people (and, by extension, of the Indus Civilization)? ~ My guess is as good as yours. [Lord Narayan/Vishnu/Hari is the supreme power/authority of the universe/cosmos. He is also known as Shivah, meaning kindness/compassionate, auspiciousness and eternally pure. He is also addressed as maheśvaram (the Supreme Lord), as aadidevah (The first devah/being); as mahaadevah (The greatest devah/being); as deveshah/Sarveshvara (The Lord of all devas); as Mahendrah (The Lord of Indra), as adhaataa (Above whom there is no other), and so on. [He is also kartaa: The doer, maargah: The path, and neyah: The guide.] ~ He has ten principal avatars or incarnations - to protect and preserve the universe/humanity from negativities/utter destruction (be they entities or be they negativism/negative actions/'darkness of the mind'). ~ Dashavatararefers to the ten principal avatars of Lord Narayan/Vishnu (as per hispromised'dharma-samsthapanarthayasambhavami yuge yuge' ~ To guide and to re-establish/revitalize/rejuvenate/re-invigorate the principles of "dharma" and "karm" - for the benefit of mankind/humanity - for a better society and civilization,I manifest Myself yuge-yuge, yug/age/era after yug/age/era). [~ Whenever and wherever society/humanity/civilization is in turmoil (in the midst of chaos/'churn') - so much so that humanity is 'paralyzed', unable to find a solution/direction, or is in free-fall... hurtling towards an abyss/'quicksand'... Lord Vishnu/Narayan incarnates to stem the free-fall/destruction/chaos/'churn', and to gradually change the (negative/destructive) course of events (no instant change, though); to guide (He is Chir-saarathy/Eternal Charioteer after all), to show the way forward... to pull humanity/society out of 'mud'/quagmire and into the 'sunlight'. ~ To re-establish the concepts of "karma" (karm yog), and "dharma" (duty/action/responsibility, even selfless action/service - for the larger good/for the benefit of humanity ~ so as to build a better society/civilization). ~ It is a commitment He has made with humanity. ~ BG IV-7:|| yada yada hi dharmasya glanir bhavati bharata abhyutthanam adharmasya tadatmanam srjamy aham || ~ Whenever and wherever there is an alarming decline or discrepancy in dharma/dharmic principles (for the greater good and/or for society/civilization to flourish well); or when such an alarming decline is perceived or becomes a bane; O Bharata (addressing Arjun, who hailed from the Puru-vansh/Bharat-vansh/lineage/clan), only then, I, manifest Myself. (~ 'Avatar' means: descent, and refers to a descent of the divine into earthly form. Avatar comes from the Sanskrit avatirna: "manifest/descent from the Lord.")] ... The Indus seals indicate fish (matsya, the 1st avatar), tortoise (kurma, the 2nd avatar) and Krishn (the 8thavatar), besides other symbols associated with Vishnu-Krishna (such as: peepal tree, peepal leaves, crocodile, chakra, peacock, eagle, conch-shell, arrow, Swastika, the unicorn/eka-shringa or one-horned (could the ekashringa/unicorn be the Vedic Asva Varaha/Varaha Asva? Could it also be indicative of the Varaha-avatar, the 3rd avatar?), the three-headed composite animal figure/the seal of Dvarka, etc). ~ Therefore, this figure depicted in what is now known as the "Pasupati Seal" could well be "Hari" (Lord of Nature, Dispeller [Haran] of Troubles/Sankat, Path-finder) - the patron/personage/presiding figure/deity of the ancient Indus people (... and, by extension, of the Indus Civilization). ~ My guess is as good as yours. ~ Also, both the yogi figures (depicted in the "Yogi Seal" and the "Pasupati Seal" respectively) - are they indicative of Lord Narayan/Vishnu/Hari as Hari-Hara or Hari-Rudra? ~ BG 10.23: || rudranam sankaras casmi || ~ "Of all the Rudras I am Sankara" [Lord Siva]; therefore, Hari-Hara and Hari-Rudra may not have been two different personages/entities... but Hari as Hara/Rudra. ~ [If only the script/glyphs could be deciphered...] 

Pic: Seals from Harappa. ~ The 1st seal (very likely) depicts a Vedic fire-altar - indicating that the Harrapans worshipped Agni. Agni is auspicious effulgence, Light Divine. BG 10.23 || vasūnāḿ pāvakaś cāsmi || ~ of the Vasus I am fire [Agni] ... Agni, the foremost of purifiers transforms that which is subtle to gross and also transforms the gross to subtle. ... Agni also symbolically represents the spiritual fire of life and the processes of transformation. [Paroshmoni is the philosopher's stone which when touched... alchemically transmutes the baser nature to a divine one. ~ Krishna possessed such an alchemic nature.]~ Agni does not indicate/signify "tyag" per se; Agni is the greatest of purifiers and the foremost amongst the five elements of nature: PanchaBhuta (also, PanchaMahaBhuta or MahaPanchaBhuta); the others being: air (vayu), water (jal), earth (prthvi) and aether (aakash, space). ~ Agni signifies "tyag" in the sense (to indicate) one has conquered oneself; in other words: that one has conquered/overcome the negativities residing in one's heart and mind. ~ And thereby become a Siddha - one whose heart is larger than the universe itself: one who has achieved the eternal bliss/contentment/spiritual ecstasy of "self-realization" ~ Sat-cit-ānanda. [Agni, in a way, signifies renewal... and Krishn was Yug Purush, Renaissance Man.] ~ The 2nd seal (very likely) depicts eagle/Garuda. Garuda (maybe an eagle-shaped vimana) is the vehicle of Lord Narayan/Vishnu/Harih. Besides, Lord Narayan is Garuda-Dhvaja, it is His symbol or insignia.

Lord Shiva (Sankara/Shambhu Nath/Rudra-Siva?) and his consort Devi Parvati in their syncretic form - as Ardhanarishvara. [PS: The depiction of Shiva/Sankara/Shambhu Nath is (largely) allegorical/symbolic. As for: whether he really had anything to do with shmashāna, etc (since the ancient Indus people seem to have buried their dead)... or it came to be associated with him later ~ courtesy the many cultic movements; whether it had anything to do with great yogis like Gorakhnath-ji or not; whether different narratives have confluenced or not? ~ My guess is as good as yours. E.g. maybe, Shambhu Nath was also known as Bhoota/Bhuta Nath [Lord/Guardian/Protector of Mankind/Beings - he was a very important figure; also, since the human body is made of the five elements of nature/PanchaBhuta] ~ but then, somewhere down the line the word 'bhuta/bhoota' probably underwent a change of meaning, 'coz 'Panchabhuta' or 'Mahapanchabhuta/PanchaMahabhuta' refers to the five elements of nature, viz fire (agni), air (vayu), water (jal), earth (prthvi) and space/aether (aakash); 'bhoot' as in 'spirits' is very likely a much recent association ~ my guess is as good as yours. ~ Therefore, aspects like ash smearing, chillum smoking, etc is (probably) courtesy the many cults that sprang up in his name - in the last millennium or so. ~ My guess is as good as yours.] 

Notes on Meluhha: Meluhha (Meluḫḫa) refers to one of ancient Sumer's (Sumerian Civilization) prominent trading partners; the word can be found in many Sumerian and Akkadian texts. [Akkadian may be a variant of Ikshvaku - son of (the current Manu) Vaivasvata Manu/Satyavrat/'Noah' and the progenitor of the Ikshvaku lineage... to which Shri Ram belonged. ~ It could either indicate the extent of Shri Ram's empire (i.e. the Ikshvaku empire), or that members of the Ikshvaku clan/lineage spread far and wide... encompassing distant lands, cultures and 'way of life'. Especially after the last great flood/'Mahajal Pralaya'.] Sumerian texts repeatedly refer to three important centers with which they traded: Magan, Dilmun, and Meluhha. ~ Magan is usually identified with Oman, though some identify it with Egypt. Dilmun was a trade distribution center for goods originating in the region of modern-day Bahrain. [~ Dilmun or Telmun was a Persian Gulf civilization that traded with Mesopotamian civilizations, the current scholarly consensus is that Dilmun encompassed Bahrain, Failaka, Kuwait and the adjacent eastern Arabia coast in the Persian Gulf. ... But then, Dilmun is said to lie "in the east where the sun rises," a situation that does not apply to the eastern Arabian littoral, Failaka or Bahrain, all of which lie south of Sumer and Eridu. ... So was the Dilmun Civilization an offshoot of the Indus Valley Civilization? ~ My guess is as good as yours. (Umm, if we can understand the Yayati story and how his five heirs were settled, i.e. how his kingdom was divided amongst his five sons... this puzzle could become much clearer. ~ Raja Yayati, as we know, did away with primogeniture, and crowned his youngest-born, Puru, as the heir to his "older" kingdom. Thereafter, Puru started the "Puruvansh" (also known as the "Bharatvansh"); thus his heirs came to be known as the "Bharatas". ~ While his other four sons - Yadu, Turvasu, Druhyu and Anu - were settled in the "newer" areas... that Raja Yayati brought under his rule/control - during his "borrowed youth" ~ i.e. post his successful high-level/advanced stem cell therapy.) ~ It is also noted that Gilgamesh had to pass through Mount Mashu to reach Dilmun in the Epic of Gilgamesh. Some believe Mount Mashu was one of two ("twin") mountains that held up the sky at the eastern and western extremities of the world. ~ So could this Mount Mashu be a reference/variant of Mt. Meru? ~ My guess is as good as yours. ... Dilmun, sometimes described as "the place where the sun rises" and "the Land of the Living", is the scene of some versions of the Sumerian creation myth, and the place where the deified Sumerian hero of the flood, Utnapishtim (Ziusudra), was taken by the gods to live forever. Thorkild Jacobsen's translation of the Eridu Genesis calls it "Mount Dilmun" which he locates as a "faraway, half-mythical place". Dilmun is also described in the epic story of Enki and Ninhursag as the site at which the Creation occurred. ~ Umm, all this does lead one to equate Dilmun and/or Mt Mashu with Mt Meru (Mandar Paravat). ~ Do look up the earlier part of this section - for more details on Mt. Meru, the Kurma Avatar, Shambhala, Samudra-manthan et al.] 

Pic:Tiger lady: Tiger Goddess? ~ Devi Kushmanda? DeviChandraghanta? Devi Katyayani? Devi Vaishnavi (now Mata Vaishno Devi)? Or, is it Devi Parvati?

[Pic:Besides this seal, numerous pottery figurines of Mother Goddesses have also been found. Nature worship must have been an integral part of their rituals... as revealed in the seals. ~ This seal depicts a horned goddess (standing in the arch of a peepal tree), with bangles on both arms; a devotee is kneeling before her. An animal, most likely a large ram, is facing her. Seven figures, wearing long dresses and bangles on their arms, are moving in a procession before her. ~ Very likely, the seven figures represent the "Sapta Matrikas" or the seven divine Mothers. The central female figure (in which case) will be Devi Parvati (consort of Sankara/Shiva/Shambhu Nath?) ~ Together, they constitute the "Asta Matrikas" or the eight divine Mothers. Some Indus glyphs are also seen.] | ~ The location of Meluhha, however, is hotly debated. ... A number of scholars suggest that "Meluhha" was the Sumerian name for western India or the Indus valley civilization. Some derive Meluhha from earlier Sumerian documents with the earlier variant "Me-lah-ha", which they identify with Met-akam"high abode" or "high country". While others read an archaic form of Meluhha as an old Aryan/Sanskrit word ("solar beam"), and compare it, in particular, with the name of the mountain Meru (mentioned in old Indian texts). Earlier texts (c.2200 BC) seem to indicate that Meluhha is to the east, suggesting either the Indus valley or India. There is plenty of archaeological evidence for the trade between Mesopotamia and the Indus Valley. [There is extensive presence of Harappan seals and cubical weight measures in Mesopotamian urban sites.] Impressions of clay seals from the Indus Valley city of Harappa were evidently used to seal bundles of merchandise, as clay seal impressions with cord or sack marks on the reverse side testify. A number of these Indus Valley seals have turned up at Ur and other Mesopotamian sites. "Persian Gulf" types of circular stamped rather than rolled seals, also known from Dilmun, that appear at Lothal in Gujarat, India, and Faylahkah, as well as in Mesopotamia, are convincing corroboration of the long-distance sea trade. ~ Mesopotamian trade documents, lists of goods, and official inscriptions mentioning Meluhha supplement Harappan seals and archaeological finds. Literary references to Meluhhan trade date from the Akkadian, the Third Dynasty of Ur, and Isin-Larsa Periods (ca 2350-1800 BCE), but the trade probably started in the Early Dynastic Period (c. 2600 BC). Some Meluhhan vessels may have sailed directly to Mesopotamian ports, although by the Isin-Larsa Period, Dilmun, which was located "en route" to Meluhha, monopolized the trade. 

Alternatively:Archaeologically there may have been two capital cities in the Indus Valley: Meluhhu (Archaeological site: Mohenjo-Daro), and the capital of the upper Indus region: Dilmun (Archaeological site: Harappa). ~ Most seals used in export by the Indus Valley were round and the seals used within the Indus Valley were square. The round export seals show up all over Mesopotamia centuries before the national seals started circulation (2500 BCE) within the Indus valley. One of those round seals found at Ur predates expected dates of the Harappan culture. Indus Valley as Meluhha was a major trader with Mesopotamia in the Agade period (2300 BCE). ~ Meluhha was mentioned in the early Sanskrit writings as Melukha or Melukhkha, commentary stated they spoke the same language... thus (some of) Sanskrit's substrate languages are proto-versions of our many languages; these languages had to have effected the major language thru time. ~ Maybe, the northern state/region of the Indus was somewhat different to the south with respect to trade, goods and services (meaning: perhaps the Sapta Sindhava region was somewhat distinct from Melukha.) Perhaps the upper Indus region was known to Mesopotamia as Dilmun ('the land of paradise' to the Mesopotamians). The paradise story matches with the Indus culture, it being most modern nation on Earth at the time. [~ However, it is the Arabian Sea that opened the doors for journey beyond to the Arabian world through the Gulf and Red Sea right into the ancient civilization of Mesopotamia and Egypt. It is possible that this sea voyage gave to the Indus Land its earliest name of "Meluhha"... because the Indus people were characterized as Malahha (Sailor or sea-men; sea-faring traders from Indian shores) in the Babylonian records. (So the word Meluhha might have meant "sailor country".).... At its peak the Indus Valley Culture is estimated to have encompassed 1.5 million sq km. This area, larger than Western Europe, was glued together through water-ways. The Indus people commanded a large fleet of ships making it possible to flourish in the vast river plains and adjacent regions. ~ The ports in what is now Balochistan and Sindh (and Lothal, in Gujarat) also saw extensive trade with African ports in Ethiopia, Somalia, Zanzibar, Kenya and Tanzania. Archaeologists have found the remnants of a "Meluhhan" village in ancient Mesopotamia (present-day Iraq). Perhaps extensive excavations and research would lead to more definite information on these (ancient) traders, who established temporary settlements as encampments at certain points on their regular routes.]

Notes on the 'decline' or withering of the Indus Civilization:Indus Valley to history buffs, school students, history classes on the Indus Valley civilization have always been simplistic. Even dull. Most history textbooks talk of how the civilization appeared like a meteor on ancient India's landscape, shone brilliantly for a while... and then was snuffed out either by 'marauding Aryans' or sudden floods. ~ It's dead boring, really. It's soporific - guaranteed cure for insomnia. Egyptian mummies somehow seem to evoke more interest than the town-planning feats of the Indus engineers. One wonders why there has been no study and/or discussion as to just how stone-age farming communities took a giant leap forward and transformed themselves into sophisticated urbanites living in cities so well designed that Indians have never been able to replicate the achievement even 5,000 years later? ... Wonder why (instead) do we continue to believe the poppycock about 'Aryan blitzkrieg'? ~ Umm, well... as they say: history is never boring, the teacher is. Or rather the books are. 

Pic: Some of the main sites of the Harappan civilization. Note the concentration along the dry bed of the Sarasvati. | Archaeologists have an exasperating tradition of labeling their discoveries after the name of the site on which it is first found. Since Harappa and Mohenjo-daro were the first to be excavated in the 1920s, Sir John Marshall, who headed the team of explorers, called it the Indus civilization because it flourished in the valley of that river. Marshall's announcement wowed the world and pushed India's known history back by about 2,000 years. At the time of Independence there was no real need to change the epithet as barely a dozen Indus sites had been explored. ~ That the Indus was indeed the nucleus of the civilization's growth is fairly certain. However, it is also apparent that the civilization did not just centre on the Indus Valley; instead, it covered wide swathes of land on either side of the Indus. ~ Archaeologists are known to stumble, but the kind of knocking that the 'Aryan invasion theory' has taken has few parallels. When the British archaeologist (Wheeler) discovered a dozen skeletons in Mohenjo-daro, he propounded a theory about the final massacre by 'marauding invaders' that put an end to the Indus civilization. When an Indian scholar told him of Hariyuppa (or "Hariyupiyah") being mentioned in the Rg Veda, he took it to mean Harappa. ~ And since a fort was known as pur, and Indra (possibly a 'title' for the king/ruler/chief of the ancient 'Deva' people) was known as Purandhara or destroyer of forts, it all fitted neatly. After all, weren't the Indus cities among the most fortified? [~ But then, our ancient texts, including the Vedas, cannot be taken as is. Large portions of them are in camouflaged language and/or is allegorical/metaphorical. Taking them literally will be misleading. Sometimes celestial events involving stars, planets, meteors, comets, constellations et al are described, while at other times natural events are talked about. E.g. 'cows coming out of mountains' is very likely a reference to 'Gomukh'; taking it at face value will be utterly misleading. ~ Even large parts of the 'Shiv-Sati' story (very likely) describes some cosmic event; 'Shiva wandering about in the cosmos with Sati's lifeless body on his shoulders' - is an imaginative description (in the style of story-telling) of some cosmic event. ... Maybe pieces of meteors and/or other celestial debris rained down on earth... and this (gradually) gave rise to our 'Shakti Peeths'. (Though a few of the 'Shakti Peeths', such as the one at Hinglaj, probably is in honour of some or the other great woman. Or [maybe] both. Celestial debris + a great human.) ~ The Shiva (of the 'Shiva-Sati' story) and the Sankara/Shambhu Nath of 'Shiva-Parvati' may not be the same person. [~ Probably, the Shiva of the Shiva-Sati story predates the Shiva/Sankara/Shambhu Nath of the Shiva-Parvati story; maybe, the former was an ancestor of the latter.] However, with time, both the stories/narratives have converged and even fused together (perhaps due to a similarity in names). Did mistranslation and/or misinterpretation happen too (thus obliteration and/or altering valuable information and 'pracheen itihasa')? ~ My guess is as good as yours. ~ Perhaps, there could be 'Asta-Matrikas' and other female deities; but having multiple Shiva(s) would have been confusing; and so, when Sanaatan Dharma assimilated temples and worship of idols... the various Shiva-s were fused into a single figure. ~ My guess is as good as yours.] ~ Yet the past 50/60 years, and more so the last decade or two has shown just how wrong Wheeler was. The last massacre theory was his imagination running riot. Far from being snuffed out, there was a brilliant resurgence of Indus culture further south for a while. Gregory Possehl (professor of anthropology at the University of Pennsylvania in the US and an expert on the Indus civilization) and who made a recent study, found that in 2000 BC in Pakistan's Sindh district the sites were down from 86 to 6 and in Cholistan, 174 to 41. But in India the sites in Haryana, Punjab and Rajasthan exploded from 218 to 853. Possehl asks: "How can this be construed as an eclipse? We are looking at a highly mobile people." [Perhaps climate change and/or change in rainfall pattern forced the ancient Indus people to migrate to other areas... in search of livelihood/greener pastures. And this would have also given rise to cultural exchanges and (therefore) synergy creation with other people. ~ Culture constantly evolves, it is never stagnant; stagnation would mean cultural Rhizopus - "the end".]

Through the processes of over-expansion and changes in important river patterns, the Harappan urban centers began to decline around 1900 B.C., and the unifying cultural symbols of the cities were no longer useful. However, the regional cultures that began to take form did retain some of the characteristic symbols and technologies of the Harappan culture. These continuities provide an important thread connecting the developments of the first urban civilization to later cultures that became dominant in the regions of the erstwhile Indus Valley civilization. Some of the technologies, architecture, artistic symbols and aspects of social organization that characterized the first urban centers of the Indus Civilization have continued up to the present in the urban setting of traditional South Asian cities. 

However, there are still many misconceptions about this culture that have resulted from the theoretical and cultural biases of the earliest excavators. Some of these misconceptions are that the Indus urban society was the result of colonization from Mesopotamia to the west (in modern Iraq); that it appeared suddenly from unknown origins; that is was a strictly uniform culture ruled by a priest-king from two major capitals; and then disappeared, leaving no influence on later cultural developments. ... But then, this is all fantasy. ~ The Indus Valley civilization developed out of earlier farming and pastoral communities that inhabited the plains and western mountainous regions of Baluchistan and Afghanistan (and maybe surrounding areas). These communities are referred to as pre- or Early Indus cultures and each had its own distinctive artistic style. These regional styles are most clearly observed in various painted designs on pottery, different types of clay figurines, toys, seals and ornaments. Although the styles of expression are different, trade and exchange networks connected the various regions and allowed for the distribution of raw materials, finished goods, technological knowledge. These items included precious stones, copper, sea-shells, chert for stone tools and probably many other commodities such as grain, wool and livestock. The gradual dispersal of specific artistic styles and motifs along with specific types of ornaments indicates that there was a gradual integration of these communities though marriage alliances, ritual interaction/festivities, trade ties, and eventually political/administrative treaties. Although in the earliest period they had not yet begun to make pottery, they lived in mud brick houses, wove baskets and adorned themselves with elaborate bead ornaments made of shell and colored stones. Some of these beads appear to have been traded from distant areas or were collected during pastoral migrations. Around 5500 B.C. the earliest forms of pottery have been discovered along with new types of ornaments and more developed architecture. The earliest forms of pottery have shapes that are similar to baskets and many of the designs on the vessels may replicate woven motifs on the earlier baskets. These decorative motifs were not simply for ornamentation, but undoubtedly had some ritual significance and were symbols that served to distinguish different clans or groups (and perhaps even regions). Excavations at the ancient mounds revealed well planned cities and towns built on massive mud brick platforms that protected the inhabitants against seasonal floods. In the larger cities the houses were built of baked brick, while at smaller towns most houses were built of sun-dried mud brick. The settlements had major streets running North-South and East-West, with smaller streets and alleys connecting neighborhoods to the main thoroughfares. Indus artisans produced a wide range of utilitarian and decorative objects using specialized techniques of stone working, ceramics and metallurgy. Copper and bronze were used to make tools, mirrors, pots and pans. Bone, shell and ivory were turned into tools, jewelry, gaming pieces and especially furniture inlay. Silver and gold utensils and ornaments were crafted. The Indus cities were connected with rural agricultural communities and distant resource and mining areas through strong trade systems. They (probably) used pack animals, riverboats, sailboats and bullock carts for transport. This trade is reflected in the widespread distribution of exquisite beads and ornaments, vessels, ladles, toys, metal tools and pottery that were produced by specialized artisans in the major towns and cities. Cotton, lumber, grain, livestock and other food stuffs were probably the major commodities of this internal trade. A highly standardized system of weights was used to control trade. 

The decline of the river Sarasvati: When the sites were plotted on a map of the subcontinent, archaeologists noticed a curious clustering of sites along the Ghaggar River that flows through Haryana and Rajasthan and runs almost parallel to the Indus. After entering Pakistan, where it is called Hakra, the river finally empties itself into the sea at the Rann. Over 175 sites were found along the alluvial plains of the Ghaggar as compared to 86 found in the Indus region. ~ What puzzled archeologists was that the Ghaggar-Hakra River and most of its tributaries are dry and their courses have silted up. So why did so many cities come up on such a desiccated water-sheet, especially at a time when rivers were the lifelines of civilization? ... Unless, of course, at one time a mighty river flowed perennially. In their search for answers, Indus experts homed in on the Rg Veda. Many of its hymns mention a sacred river called Sarasvati, describing it as the foremost of rivers, big as the ocean, rising in the mountains and flowing between the Yamuna and Sutlej (Sutudri or Satadru or SuturI) before entering the sea. But in later Vedic hymns it is no longer described as mighty. The Mahabharata also talks about the River Sarasvati as a river in decline.[Therefore, migration from the Indus region has not been a single exodus, but in batches (beginning 3900 years ago)... once the mighty Sarasvati began to shrink. ~ Some of the Indus people traveled as far as Egypt (ancient Miṣr) and maybe even beyond... carrying their culture, language(s) and 'way of life' with them. Inevitably 'cross-pollination' happened. Thus, the Lion-Man (Nrsingh) probably became the 'Sphinx' and perhaps Garuda gave way to Horus - the Falcon-god or the Falcon-headed man. ~ Do look up the earlier section for more details.] ~ In the '80s, Indian satellite images of the region showed that the ancient bed of the Ghaggar-Hakra River could be traced from the Sivaliks to the Rann of Kutch. Where it is not covered by sand, the bed of the river consists of a fertile loam and its width extends from three to 10 km on different parts of its course, making it a very large river. Putting together the evidence some archeologists and Indus experts concluded that the Ghaggar-Hakra River was the Vedic Sarasvati and existed when the Indus civilization flourished. [... However, equating the Ghaggar-Hakra River with the Vedic Sarasvati could be misleading. The Sarasvati probably declined (over a period of time) due to a combination of factors, such as: change in rainfall pattern, climate change, rise in pollution levels, rampant urbanization and so on; maybe it also changed course due to a massive earthquake... and was eventually 'lost'. ~ Easily recognizable are the Indus and its current tributaries, but the Sarasvati, portrayed as "surpassing in majesty and might all other waters" and "pure in her course from mountains to the ocean," was lost. Based on ancient textual descriptions, it was believed that the Sarasvati was fed by perennial glaciers in the Himalayas. Today, the Ghaggar, an intermittent river that flows only during strong monsoons and dissipates into the desert along the dried course of Hakra valley, is thought to best approximate the location of the mythic Sarasvati, but its Himalayan origin and whether it was active during Vedic times remain controversial. ~ New research argues that these crucial differences prove that the Sarasvati was not Himalayan-fed, but a perennial monsoon-supported watercourse, and that aridification reduced it to short seasonal flows. ... But then, it is still not convincing/compelling enough to equate the Vedic Sarasvati with the Ghaggar-Hakra.] 

Climate change was a key ingredient in the (gradual) collapse and/or diversification and/or fragmentation/shrinkage of the great Indus or Harappan Civilization (beginning) almost 4000 years ago. ~ There is clear indication that the rainfall pattern, which had initially brought fertility to the land, had become adverse in the Sindh region. And given the instability of the Himalayan region, there may have been a massive earthquake that possibly changed the course of rivers such as the Sarasvati and (thus) affected many Indus cities. ~ The Indus people then migrated eastward. Braj Basi Lal, a former ASI director-general, talks of steep decline in trade because of problems in Sumer that resulted in a Great Depression and turned many urban centres into ghost cities. Archaeologist Ravindra Singh Bisht concurs with Lal but goes a step further. He says that after the quake hit the heart of the civilization, the Indus people migrated east which acted like a sort of bypass to their woes. And like a dying candle, it shone brilliantly again but briefly before being snuffed out. Dholavira, Banawali, Mehrgarh, Harappa - in fact, all the major cities show that as the cities declined, encroachments on streets that were unseen at its peak began to occur with alarming regularity. Houses became increasingly shoddy in construction. The city was dying. There was a breakdown in sanitation and cities like their modern-day counterparts in India simply ran themselves aground. They were replaced by massive squatter colonies and an explosion of rural sites as people, disillusioned with cities, went back to farming communities. A giant step backward. [~ Yet it wasn't as if all came to naught as was earlier believed. Some of the writings survived in the pottery (and seals and tablets) of the following ages. The weight and decimal system too lived on. And so did the bullock-cart technology that the Indus people had perfected. Even some of their farming techniques. Besides, all the ruins of course... for us to wonder and marvel.]

[Pic: Indus Terracotta Vessel. Circa: 3500 BC to 2500 BC.]

Alternatively:It could also be that faced with multiple challenges arising out of over expansion, over-exploitation of nature and unplanned urbanization... disproportionate to essentials like water-supply and sanitation (besides a sharp decline in trade... that would have also affected employment, purchasing power, collective prosperity et al) the ancient Indus people, in their collective wisdom, decided to alter the course of their 'way of life'... and (thus) went back to living in harmony with nature. ~ And this probably helped them breath new life into the once-glorious civilization. [... Therefore, it may be somewhat misleading to say that the civilization appeared like a meteor on ancient India's landscape, shone brilliantly for a while... then declined, and was finally snuffed out. ~ Instead, the Indus people simply adjusted to the changes and challenges (both natural and man-made)... and so, the civilization lived on. Rather flourished in its own way.] 

So although earlier scholars thought that the Indus civilization disappeared around 1700 B.C., recent excavations indicate that the civilization gradually became fragmented into smaller regional cultures referred to as Late or post-Harappan cultures. The ruling classes and merchants of the major urban centers were no longer able to control the trade networks that served to integrate such a vast geographical area. The use of standardized weights, writing and seals became unnecessary as their social and political control gradually disappeared. The decline of the major urban centers and the fragmentation of the Indus culture can be attributed in part to changing river systems (due to climate change and change in rainfall pattern) that disrupted the agricultural and economic system. As the river dried up the Indus people migrated to the central Indus valley, the Ganga-Yamuna Valley or the fertile plains of Gujarat in western India. The Indus river itself began to change its course, resulting in destructive floods. Certain distinguishing hallmarks of the Indus civilization disappeared. Others, such as writing and weights, or aspects of Indus craft technology, art, agriculture and possibly social organization, continued among the Late and post-Harappan cultures. These cultural traditions eventually became incorporated in the new urban civilization that arose during the Early Historical period, around 600 B.C. 

Whether the artefacts are called Hakra ware; whether the civilization is divided into pre-Harappan stage or mature-Harappan phase, pre- or early Indus cultures, Neolithic-age or Chalcolithic age, and so on... it is all for academic purposes. ~ It does not indicate different culture(s) or people; it simply indicates the gradual progress of the civilization through various stages/phases from simple pastoral communities to a bustling metropolis and trading powerhouse. ~ The greatness of the Sindhu-Sarasvati civilization can (thus) be attributed to ancient Indian genius. Apart from its striking cultural continuity with subsequent (diversification, fragmentation, assimilation and) developments of Indian civilization, which makes up a total thread of (at least) 9,000 years (since much of the excavation is yet to happen), the ancient Indus people exhibited the following traits: an enterprising spirit, a knowledge-based and forward-looking culture, a remarkable adaptability to changing conditions, a spiritual content, and, most importantly, a capacity for a broader view, without which such a vast area could not have had such a cultural affinity (and all-round progress and trade) free from major hiccups.

Evolution of the fluvial landscape: Landscape dynamics as the crucial link between climate change and people.~ By 3900 years ago, their rivers drying, the Harappans had an escape route to the east toward the Ganges basin, where monsoon rains remained reliable. We can envision that this eastern shift involved a change to more localized forms of economy: smaller communities supported by local rain-fed farming and dwindling streams. This may have produced smaller surpluses, and would not have supported large cities, but would have been reliable. But then, such a system was not quite favourable for the sustenance of the Indus civilization as it was known (i.e. to maintain the well-knit 'high summer' phase of the Indus civilization, which had been built on bumper crop surpluses along the Indus and the Sarasvati rivers in the earlier wetter era). This dispersal of population meant that there was no longer a concentration of workforce to support urbanism. Thus cities collapsed, but smaller agricultural communities were sustainable and flourished. Many of the urban arts, such as writing, faded away (and evolved), but agriculture continued and perhaps diversified. [~ Maybe, due to the change in rainfall pattern/monsoon coupled with a warming world (climate change) catastrophic floods (due to rising sea levels) turned much of the ancient Indus irrigation system, designed for a tamer river, obsolete.] 

~ Should the Indus Valley civilization be renamed the Sarasvati Valley civilization? Or would Sindhu-Sarasvati civilization be more appropriate? ~ Well, my guess is as good as yours.

Krishn means "the all-attractive One". || brahmaṇyo devakī-putraḥ|| ~ "The son of Devakī, Kṛṣṇa, is the Supreme/Primeval Being." || eko vai nārāyaṇa āsīn na brahmā na īśāno nāpo nāgni-samau neme dyāv-āpṛthivī na nakṣatrāṇi na sūryaḥ || ~ "In the beginning of the creation there was only the Supreme/Primeval Being Nārāyaṇa. There was no Brahmā, no Śiva, no water, no fire, no moon, no stars in the sky, no sun." || nārāyaṇaḥ paro devas tasmāj jātaś caturmukhaḥ tasmād rudro 'bhavad devaḥ sa ca sarva-jñatāḿ gataḥ || ~ "Nārāyaṇa is the Supreme/Primeval Being, and from Him Brahmā was born, from whom Śiva was born." ~ Meaning: Lord Narayana created Lord Brahma who in turn created Lord Siva (this Lord Siva very likely is the better-half of the higher being named Parvati.) ~ Thus, Lord Narayan is also called Brahmn and Srashtaa: Supreme Creator and Lord of Creation. He is also Prapitaamahah: The father of the 'father of beings' (Brahma) - one who instructs Lord Brahma. ~ He is therefore Satyam-Shivam-Sundaaram/ Purushottam Satya/ Satya-Sundar (Truth/Dharma-Auspiciousness-Beauty/Goodness). ~ Lord Kṛṣṇa is the source of all generations, and He is called the Causeof everything. He says: || ahaḿ sarvasya prabhavo mattaḥ sarvaḿ pravartate|| ~ "I am the source of all spiritual and material worlds. Everything emanates from Me." [In other words: Because everything emanates from Him, He is the original source of all.] ~ And thus, He is ekah: The one; naikah: The many; asankhyeyah: He who has countless names and forms; saksih: All-witnessing Lord; aadidevah: The first devah/being; mahaadevah: The greatest devah/being; deveshah/Sarveshvara: The Lord of all devas; Mahendrah: The Lord of Indra; Vishwakarma: Creator of the Universe. ~ He is also puruṣa-uttama: greatest of all beings; bhūta-bhāvana: origin of everything; bhūta-īśa: Lord of everything; deva-deva: Lord of all demigods, higher beings; Lokadhyaksha/Trivikrama: Lord of all the three Lokas/Trilok/Tribhuvan (Urdhva-loka, Madhya-loka and Adho-loka; also: land, water and space/sky); Harih: The Lord of Nature;Jagannatha: Lord of the Universe; Jagat-pate/Jagat-patih: Lord of the entire Universe/Cosmos. ~ And so, He is adhaataa: Above whom there is no other. He is also kartaa: The doer, maargah: The path, and neyah: The guide.

BG 10.11: || teṣām evānukampārtham aham ajñāna-jaḿ tamaḥ nāśayāmy ātma-bhāva-stho jñāna-dīpena bhāsvatā || ~ I, who dwell within their inner psyche as consciousness, destroy the darkness born of ignorance by the shining lamp of transcendental knowledge as an act of compassion for them. 

(BG 10.16) Arjun says/asks: || vaktum arhasy aśeṣeṇa divyā hy ātma-vibhūtayaḥ yābhir vibhūtibhir lokān imāḿs tvaḿ vyāpya tiṣṭhasi || ~ "Please tell me in detail of Your divine opulence/manifestations by which You pervade all these worlds/planets." (BG 10.17): || kathaḿ vidyām ahaḿ yogiḿs tvāḿ sadā paricintayan keṣu keṣu ca bhāveṣu cintyo 'si bhagavan mayā || ~ "O Kṛṣṇa, O supreme mystic, how shall I constantly think of You, and how shall I know You? In what various forms are You to be remembered, O Supreme One?"

[Pic: Illustration of the Vishwaroop or Viraat-roop.] Everything is a manifestation of the Absolute:(śrī-bhagavān uvāca) The Supreme Lord said: O Arjun, now I shall explain to you My prominent divine manifestations, because My manifestations are endless. (10.19) ~ I am the Supersoul/Atman, O Arjun, seated in the hearts of all living entities. I am the beginning, the middle and the end of all beings (aham ātmā guḍākeśa sarva-bhūtāśaya-sthitaḥ aham ādiś ca madhyaḿ ca bhūtānām anta eva ca. ~ 10.20) Of the Ādityas I am Viṣṇu (the sustainer), of all luminous objects/jyotiṣām I am the radiant sun, of the Maruts I am Marīci, and among the stars I am the moon (ādityānām ahaḿ viṣṇur jyotiṣāḿ ravir aḿśumān marīcir marutām asmi nakṣatrāṇām ahaḿ śaśī. ~ 10.21) I am the Vedas, I am the celestial rulers (Devas) (or rather, of the demigods/celestial Devas I am Indra, the ruler of the Heavenly Planets/Svarga-loka); of the senses I am the mind; and in living beings I am the living force/consciousness. (~ "Consciousness" and "conscience" are two different things; "consciousness" is awareness, sentience - the ability to feel, perceive, comprehend or to experience. It is necessary for cognition. Else a human will remain in a vegetative state.] (vedānāḿ sāma-vedo 'smi devānām asmi vāsavaḥ indriyāṇāḿ manaś cāsmi bhūtānām asmi cetanā. ~ 10.22) Of all the Rudras I am Shankara/Lord Śiva (Shambhu Nath?) [And, is that why "Virupaksha" - one with oblique eyes - is used for both Vishnu and Shiva? Also, is that why "Harihara" and "Harirudra" has come about?Besides, was the human Devi Parvati (also known as Ambika or Durga) the consort of this Shambhu Nath? ~ Lakshmi and Sarasvati - their daughters? Kartik - their son? ~ My guess is as good as yours], of the Yakṣas (small-sized humans) and Rākṣasas (an Asura sub-clan) I am Kuvera, of the Vasus I am fire [Agni], and of mountains I am Meru (meruḥ śikhariṇām - if Mt Mandar is part of Mt Meru, then 'meruḥ śikhariṇām' would indicate both) ~ (rudrāṇāḿ śańkaraś cāsmi vitteśo yakṣa-rakṣasām vasūnāḿ pāvakaś cāsmi meruḥ śikhariṇām aham. ~ 10.23) Of preceptors, O Son of Pṛthā (Kunti), know Me to be the chief, Bṛhaspati. Of generals I am Skandaḥ, and of bodies of water I am the ocean (purodhasāḿ ca mukhyaḿ māḿ viddhi pārtha bṛhaspatim senānīnām ahaḿ skandaḥ sarasām asmi sāgaraḥ. ~ 10.24) [Kārtikeya means, 'son of Kartik'; though, with time, both Kartik and Skandah have come to be regarded as one and the same.) | Of the great sages I am Bhṛgu; of vibrations I am the transcendental AUM. Of sacrifices I am the chanting of the holy names [japa], and of immovable things I am the Himālayas (maharṣīṇāḿ bhṛgur ahaḿ girām asmy ekam akṣaram yajñānāḿ japa-yajño 'smi sthāvarāṇāḿ himālayaḥ.~ 10.25) Of all trees I am the (asvatthah) fig tree (it can mean: banyan tree as well as the Peepal/aśvatthaḥ, or maybe both), and of the celestial sages/Devarshis I am Nārada. Of the Gandharvas I am Citraratha, and among perfected beings (Siddhas) I am the sage (Muni) Kapila (aśvatthaḥ sarva-vṛkṣāṇāḿ devarṣīṇāḿ ca nāradaḥ gandharvāṇāḿ citrarathaḥ siddhānāḿ kapilo muniḥ. ~ 10.26) Of horses know Me to be Uccaiḥśravā (the snow-white and seven-headed flying horse, considered the best of horses and king of horses), produced/created during the churning of the ocean for nectar/amṛit (i.e. during early stages of creation of the universe. ~ Maybe, it is a swift and powerful flying vehicle that has given rise to the phrase 'horse-power', and not a horse per se. But does it also mean Krishn had equine features?) Of lordly elephants I am Airāvata, and among men/humanity I am the monarch (Cakravartin) (uccaiḥśravasam aśvānāḿ viddhi mām amṛtodbhavam airāvataḿ gajendrāṇāḿ narāṇāḿ ca narādhipam. ~ 10.27) Of weapons I am the thunderbolt; among cows I am the surabhi (a metaphor for prosperity, and not a bovine creature per se). Of causes for procreation I am Kandarpa (or Cupid), the god of love, and of serpents I am Vāsuki (āyudhānām ahaḿ vajraḿ dhenūnām asmi kāmadhuk prajanaś cāsmi kandarpaḥ sarpāṇām asmi vāsukiḥ. ~ 10.28) Of the many-hooded great serpents I am Ananta, and among the aquatics I am Varuṇa (Varundev: controller of the waters; also, for purposes of comprehension, let's say: Devaraj Indra's minister for water resources - for the entire universe). Of departed ancestors I am Aryamā, and among the dispensers of retribution (for negative/Prarabda karma) I am Yama, the lord of divine Justice/final, eternal judgment (anantaś cāsmi nāgānāḿ varuṇo yādasām aham pitṝṇām aryamā cāsmi yamaḥ saḿyamatām aham. ~ 10.29) [Note: there is a vast 'ocean' (the 'ocean of Garbha') present at the bottom of the universe. This 'ocean' is very likely a combination of cosmic dust, energy and gas, even gas hydrates formed under conditions of high pressures and low temperatures, etc... and maybe, even a great amount of suction force. Its appearance is in the form of 'concentric circles or bands'... though none of it is visible to the unaided eye. During "Prakritik Maha Pralaya" ~ at the end of Brahma's Lifetime/Life-span (this is when Prakriti/Material Nature [except the eternal Vaikunth planets] is completely dissolved) - Prakriti/Material Nature 'dissolves' into this 'ocean of Garbha'. ~ This 'ocean of Garbha' is metaphorically indicated as the endless serpent 'Adi-Sesha' or 'Ananta-Sesha'. (Ananta = infinity, endless, eternal. Sesha = zero, shunya.) "Prakritik Maha Pralaya" (dissolution) occurs when 'Ananta' becomes 'Sesha', infinity becomes zero and Yog-maya (the ever changing and evolving/ 'illusory' [mayamayi or transient] Prakriti/Material Universe/Nature) becomes Yog-nidra (the big sleep). Therefore, in a manner of speaking, it is said that when Adishesa 'uncoils', time (kaal, kaalah) moves forward and creation takes place. When Adisesha/ Śeṣanāga 'coils back', the universe ceases to exist. ("Shesha" in Sanskrit texts, especially those relating to mathematical calculation, also implies the "remainder" - that which remains when all else ceases to exist.) ~ So, very likely, what is today known as the "Shiv Ling" was actually a depiction of this above phenomenon: of "creation" and "dissolution". (~ Maybe the Gupta emperors installed it... to depict the cosmic phenomenon of "creation" and "dissolution". However, with the passage of time - possibly after the decline of the Gupta era - due to various interpolations, extrapolations, mistranslations and so on, it has now come to be understood/regarded as the "Shiv Ling". ... And so, the original depiction has not only undergone several changes, but a lot of knowledge has also been obliterated along with it. Plus, we have no way of knowing what it was originally called either. Alas.)]

Among the Daityas (an Asura sub-clan) I am Prahlāda, among subduers I am time (kālaḥ), among beasts/animals I am the lion, and among birds I am Garuḍa (Lord Narayan’s insignia, as well as His vehicle/vahan - probably the name of His flying vehicle; it also indicates eagle or maybe falcon) (prahlādaś cāsmi daityānāḿ kālaḥ kalayatām aham mṛgāṇāḿ ca mṛgendro 'haḿ vainateyaś ca pakṣiṇām. ~ 10.30) I am the wind among the purifiers, and Shri Ram among the warriors (warrior = reformer, for a better and inclusive society). I am the crocodile among the fishes (can also mean aquatic creatures); and of flowing waters/rivers I am the River Ganga (pavanaḥ pavatām asmi rāmaḥ śastra-bhṛtām aham jhaṣāṇāḿ makaraś cāsmi srotasām asmi jāhnavī. ~ 10.31) I am the beginning, the middle, and the end of all creation, O Arjun. Among spiritual knowledge I am knowledge of the supreme Self. I am logic of the logician (sargāṇām ādir antaś ca madhyaḿ caivāham arjuna adhyātma-vidyā vidyānāḿ vādaḥ pravadatām aham. ~ 10.32) Of letters I am the letter A (the sound 'A' is the foremost of the sounds. All the alphabets begin with the letter 'A', thus is number 1. Before number one it can only be zero (shunya). Zero (shunya) is the potential Creation, the Cosmic Egg, which would manifest in due course of time, and Fire (Brahm-jyotih?) is the basis for such manifestation. All the planes of existence are the result of the work of Agni. Agni - the foremost of purifiers - transforms that which is subtle to gross and also transforms the gross to subtle. In the beginning it is from subtle to gross and later from gross to subtle. The evolution and involution is the work of Agni. ~ The whole creation-related work commences from Him and He is the one who emerges from the unknown to the known as the Cosmic Bang. The dynamism in us is also Fire. The Kundalini 'Fire' causes enlightenment of the brain cells. But enflaming the Kundalini 'Fire' requires service to the fellow beings, to the society (selfless/non-benefit-seeking/nishkam service/action... that contributes towards a better society.) One has to dedicate oneself to nishkam karm... without which the Kundalini 'Fire' is not ignited. Agni: exists as Cosmic Fire, Solar Fire and as Frictional Fire. The Kundalini Fire is Frictional Fire, when it is below the diaphragm. When it is above the diaphragm, it is already Solar Fire, and when it reaches the brain, it is Electric Fire (brilliant white). As one progresses regularly (in nishkam karm), the brilliance of the 'Golden disc' grows. Just as the morning Sun who is Golden in colour grows to brilliant white, the 'Golden disc/chakra' visualized at the eyebrow centre rises to Ajnea center/chakra and shines forth like a diamond disc/chakra. This is the final state of the Kundalini 'Fire'. When this 'chakra' opens, it is deemed as the opening of the Third Eye. ~ On a separate note: Agni also symbolically represents the spiritual fire of life and the processes of transformation. It is the foremost amongst purifiers. Agni does not indicate/signify "tyag" per se; Agni is the greatest of purifiers and the foremost amongst the five elements of nature - PanchaBhuta (also: PanchaMahaBhuta or MahaPanchaBhuta). ~ Agni signifies "tyag" in the sense (to indicate) one has conquered oneself; in other words: that one has conquered/overcome the negativities residing in one's heart and mind. And thereby, become a Siddha), and among compound words I am the dual compound. I am also inexhaustible time, and of creators I am Brahmā (akṣarāṇām a-kāro 'smi dvandvaḥ sāmāsikasya ca aham evākṣayaḥ kālo dhātāhaḿ viśvato-mukhaḥ. ~ 10.33) I am all-consuming time, and I am the generating principle/cause/energy of all that is yet to be." (Alternatively: "I am all-consuming time, and I am too the birth of all that shall come into being.") Among women I am glorious deeds (kīrtiḥ), radiance (śrīr), fine speech/persuasion (vāk), memory/clarity of thought/discernment (smṛtir), intelligence (medhā), resilience/steadfastness (dhṛtiḥ) and patience/forgiveness/high-mindedness/magnanimity/nobility of spirit (kṣamā). (mṛtyuḥ sarva-haraś cāham udbhavaś ca bhaviṣyatām kīrtiḥ śrīr vāk ca nārīṇāḿ smṛtir medhā dhṛtiḥ kṣamā. ~ 10.34) I am Brihatsaam among the Vedic hymns. I am Gāyatrī mantra among the Vedic mantras. Of months I am Mārgaśīrṣa [November-December], and of seasons I am spring (maybe that's why Shyamsundar Krishn is the personification of spring). (bṛhat-sāma tathā sāmnāḿ gāyatrī chandasām aham māsānāḿ mārga-śīrṣo 'ham ṛtūnāḿ kusumākaraḥ. ~ 10.35) I am gamble of the guileful, splendor of the splendid, victory of the victorious, enterprise of the enterprising/resolute, and strength of the strong/determined. (dyūtaḿ chalayatām asmi tejas tejasvinām aham jayo 'smi vyavasāyo 'smi sattvaḿ sattvavatām aham. ~ 10.36) Among the Vrishnis I am Vaasudev (of Dvarka), Arjun among the Paandavs, Vyaas among the sages, and Ushanaa among the poets/great thinkers. (vṛṣṇīnāḿ vāsudevo 'smi pāṇḍavānāḿ dhanañjayaḥ munīnām apy ahaḿ vyāsaḥ kavīnām uśanā kaviḥ.~ 10.37) I am the power/sagacity of rulers, the statesmanship of the seekers of victory; I am silence among the secrets, and the Self-knowledge of the knowledgeable (i.e. of the wise I am the wisdom). (daṇḍo damayatām asmi nītir asmi jigīṣatām maunaḿ caivāsmi guhyānāḿ jñānaḿ jñānavatām aham. ~ 10.38)  Furthermore, O Arjuna, I am the origin of all beings (the cause of all creations). There is nothing, animate or inanimate, that can exist without Me. (yac cāpi sarva-bhūtānāḿ bījaḿ tad aham arjuna na tad asti vinā yat syān mayā bhūtaḿ carācaram. ~ 10.39) 

The manifest creation is a very small fraction of the Absolute:There is no end of My divine manifestations, O Arjun. What I have spoken to you is but a mere indication of My infinite manifestations. (nānto 'sti mama divyānāḿ vibhūtīnāḿ parantapa eṣa tūddeśataḥ prokto vibhūter vistaro mayā. ~ 10.40) Know that whatever is endowed with glory, brilliance, and power - spring from but a spark of My splendor. (yad yad vibhūtimat sattvaḿ śrīmad ūrjitam eva vā tat tad evāvagaccha tvaḿ mama tejo-'ḿśa-sambhavam. ~ 10.41) But what need is there, O Arjun, for all this detailed knowledge? I continually support the entire universe by a small fraction of My divine power (YogMaya). (atha vā bahunaitena kiḿ jñātena tavārjuna viṣṭabhyāham idaḿ kṛtsnam ekāḿśena sthito jagat. ~ 10.42)

Pic:an illustration of the "Vishwa-roop" or "Viraat-roop" (the "Universal Form" of the Cosmic Person/Being). However, Lord Narayan is not manushya/human. Plus, no illustration can ever bring out the true form/appearance/essence of the maheśvaram - the "Vishwa-roop" or "Viraat-roop". ~ Noone (in the current era/yug: Kaliyug) has ever seen it... and so, have to rely on one's (human) imagination. ~ The 'venom' or 'toxin' directed at him does not rile him: BG 9.11: || avajānanti māḿ mūḍhā mānuṣīḿ tanum āśritam paraḿ bhāvam ajānanto mama bhūta-maheśvaram || ~ "The ignorant deride Me when I descend in the human form. They do not know (are unaware of) My transcendental nature (appearance) as the Supreme Lord (maheśvaram) of all that be." ~ That transcendental appearance/form so bewildered and astonished someone like Arjun (son of Kunti and Lord Indra, ruler of demi-gods, and a Deva - a much Higher Being than Humans - begotten through advanced genetic engineering), making his hair stand on end (tataḥ sa vismayāviṣṭo hṛṣṭa-romā dhanañjayaḥ); a transcendental form/appearance that was so glowing (dīptimantam) that Arjun found it difficult to see (despite having been granted the 'sight'/equipped by Krishn) ~ because of its glaring effulgence, spreading on all sides, like blazing fire or the immeasurable radiance of the sun (tejo-rāśiḿ sarvato dīptimantam paśyāmi tvāḿ durnirīkṣyaḿ samantād dīptānalārka-dyutim aprameyam). ~ Arjun said: || tejobhir āpūrya jagat samagraḿ bhāsas tavogrāḥ pratapanti viṣṇo || ~ Covering the entire universe with Your effulgence, You are manifest with terrible, scorching rays. || ākhyāhi me ko bhavān ugra-rūpo namo 'stu te deva-vara prasīda || ~ O Lord of lords, so fierce of form, please tell me who You are. I offer my obeisance unto You; please be gracious to me. | śrī-bhagavān uvāca (Sri Bhagavan said): || kālo 'smi loka-kṣaya-kṛt pravṛddho || ~ "Time I am, (kālo 'smi), the destroyer of all/the shatterer of worlds."

... Krishna, Eternal Enigma: adept at captivating... in the endless meshes of His music (emanating from His flute, even His metaphoric flute), so much so that people tended to see and understand what he wanted them to see and understand, about him. [And this helped him to mislead the mind or thinking of others (especially those of unwanted entities.) It also allowed him to effectively create and maintain a façade, a smooth façade, enigma even: one that enabled him to concentrate on what he had set out to do/achieve... instead of wasting his time and energy beset with unwanted stuff. And this is important, since his arrival/descent on earth is to achieve a series of tasks (and that too within a specific period of time). He was an outsider, an interloper. By 'masking' himself (i.e. by creating a veneer, to sort of armour himself up for the long and arduous journey ahead), he could offset and/or circumvent/bypass (at least to a large extent) issues like, credibility challenges (due to his youth and clean slate status vis-à-vis all the grandees he interacted with - both within and outside of Hastinapur), his (dethroned and) far less influential family and clan (than the Kuru or the Puru clan, for example) and the like.He was also not operating from a position of strength (in fact, far from it), nor did he have the kind of clout enjoyed by various other entities and personalities. Besides, there was numerous 'cross-currents'. So imagine his selling skills. He was a consummate marketer and diplomat. Yes, he was well-educated and erudite... but so were many others. And his eruditeness did not shield him from all the 'toxin' and 'venom' spewed at him; it did not make his circumstances ideal nor his journey any easier. And he did not have the luxury of a carefree life either. Nor did he have any practical experience (whatsoever) in the treacherous world of kutniti and politics... and yet, found himself instantly drawn into a whirlpool of intrigue (unleashed by the machinations of the tyrannical Jarasandha and Kansh) - at a young age. [Therefore, he led a life full of stress, numerous pressures and high-velocity from an early age.] Krishn was thus vulcanized via the most trying of circumstances... and appeared on the scene with his heroic abilities, superior intellect and tremendous political foresight ~ when the political situation of the land was most difficult. But then, Krishna possessed great foresight, astuteness, commitment and vision coupled with a strong mind and an equally strong spine. ('Coz a weak spine cannot support a strong mind and vice versa.) [A couple of sermons or even a series of sermons would not have impacted the likes of Jarasandh, Duryodhan, Shakuni, etc, etc. Attempting such a thing would have been the heights of idealism/naivety... and delusional. What would have been the course of the Mahabharata then? Thus, this 'duality' or dualism is not 'prarabda (negative) karm'. It is "dharma" (justice and principles) ~ Krishna's actions benefited society (Loka-sangraha/Loka-kalyana). ~ It helped build a better society. It is the best example of the concept of: 'lotus feet' and kara-puṣkara or 'lotus-palm'. In the greatest battlefield of ethics, ideas and principles... in that great 'manthan' he remained steadfast yet "detached" - like a swan/hamsah ~ whose feathers do not get damp despite remaining in water, due to his yogi/hamsan nature. (Do read the fourth paragraph from the last and the second paragraph from the top... to know more about "yogi", "detachment" and kara-puṣkara or 'lotus-palm'.) The concept of "dharma" is neither straight and narrow nor black and white. ~ Asato mā sad gamaya | From ignorance/untruth, lead me unto truth (dharma, ethics, actions that benefit society) | Tamaso mā jyotir gamaya ~ From darkness (the 'fog' of regressive aspects, ignorance, 'sleep' [stagnation, decline/decay], delusion and pessimism), lead me unto light (knowledge, hope, wisdom, enlightenment ~ that help build/create a better society and civilization.)] Bathed in the complexity of real-life struggle, totally divested of His miraculous powers and abilities... Krishn navigated through (a maze of) shifting power centers, intrigues, smokescreen, parochialism, 'cross-currents', politics, diplomacy, and so on... armed with only his brilliance, his clear-sightedness/acumen and his charm. What a maestro! However, he does not come across as 'rigid rigid'. That would be folly. That would not be strategic. Instead, he comes across as 'savvy flexible'... a tactic sometimes necessary in dealing with inimical forces/entities (... especially if the latter were to wield great power and influence.)] Note:In the world of diplomacy there is no such thing as 'promises' or permanent friendship/alliances - without mutual commonalities. Both the quality and the quantity of mutual commonalities may advance positive alliance. It is crucial to tactfully employ alliance-building strategies. Nothing is cast-iron otherwise. (Events and situations are dynamic and ever-changing.) There are issues and interests, there is give-and-take; people and groups (even adversaries and unknown entities... who may not have the same level of resources, power and clout) sit across the table/meet with each other, interact and discuss (issues, concerns and points) - over a period of time - to align their interests, to identify commonalities and areas of convergence ~ to finally come to an acceptable agreement/convergence of interests/views or a reasonably win-win situation. [There would be no progress otherwise; it would result in a perpetual stalemate, and letting go of opportunities... and ultimately the converse of 'a stitch in time saves nine'. How then would a people and nation move into the direction they want to go?] In such a world/scenario... being 'rigid-rigid' is folly. Instead, one needs to be 'savvy-flexible': visionary/far-sighted, sagacious (discerning enough to read situations/events... and how they will play out in the future); be able to see/keep the big (macro) picture in mind. An understanding of issues/events/situations and how they will play out in the short/mid-term and long-term is crucial. ~ Krishn was a diplomat, a nation-builder, a catalyst, and statesman-par-excellence (do also read this post in its entirety - to get the drift); one who was among humans for a purpose; one who also thought about the future of humanity and civilizational progress... and this reflects in his many endeavours. (He was also the one who steered the transition from one era/yug to another.) He was a maestro; his sharpness, foresight and courage coupled with his gumption, ability to stay the course, savvy-flexibility and alchemic nature made things happen (despite great adversities, and despite him not being in a position of strength vis-à-vis his adversaries, etc.) He was also a Yug Purush, Renaissance Man. [It is pointless to even say that Krishn (the 8th Vishnu) made 'promises' to the likes of Duryodhan. His work is according to the Cosmic Plan. He "awakens" - by bringing out both the positive and the negative ~ so as to dispel confusion... to usher in clarity, introspection and transformation... leading to corrective action/course correction. (And, he does it in a manner that is understandable/graspable by the humans of that/specific era/yug, 'coz comprehension, cognitive levels et al do not remain homogeneous across eras/ages/yugs. Nor do the human-species remain the same.) His 'promises' to the likes of Duryodhan are part of his '...dharma-samsthapanarthaya sambhavami yuge-yuge' (To guide and to re-establish/revitalize/rejuvenate/reinvigorate the principles of "dharma" and "karm" ~ for the benefit of mankind/humanity ~ for a better society and civilization, I manifest Myself millennium after millennium.) Duryodhan et al were neither known for their ethics or integrity nor were their objectives noble. So, if they were to prevail... what would have happened to society/civilization? ~ Instead, Krishn protected and preserved humanity/mankind and the earth. How would things/events have turned out otherwise? ~ Although a 'leela-avatar', He is not an Avatar of the Cosmic Person/Being, but is considered as the Cosmic Person/Being Himself (albeit, in the flesh). || krishnas tu bhagavan svayam || He is the Cosmic Teacher and Cosmic Ruler. He is keshavah: One whose rays illumine the cosmos (Brahm-jyoti), and one who is himself the three: kah Brahma, ahVishnu and Isa Shiva. ~ Even though in His human form, His purpose is different and his message is universal. ... Anyone who attributes human values to God (the 'leela-avatars' included) - has failed to realize the true Leelas behind those episodes. Such a person or persons have (thus) been unable to grasp/comprehend/understand the lesson(s) imparted by the Cosmic Being... and is therefore, 'asleep' ('fog', stagnation of the mind). PS: In Treta, one of the major reasons for the Ramayana War... was to destroy dangerous weaponry (including gigantic humanoid-robots like "Kumbhakarna" - that carried a variety of weapons) ~ to protect this planet and civilizations therein. Shri Ram (the Ram-avatar) also dismantled the "Shiv-dhanush" or Pinaka - euphemism for the most destructive nuclear weapons - after an all-round agreement/general consensus. ~ In Dvapar, one of the major purposes of the Dharm-Yudh (battle of ideas, ethics and principles) was to rid the planet of extremely destructive weaponry and unnatural humans (highly evolved humanoids) - to allow the planet, humanity and civilization to "heal"... so as to progress naturally and peacefully.] | As they say: It takes courage to answer a call, It takes courage to give your all. It takes courage to risk your name, It takes courage to be true. It takes courage to dare what no other would share, to be standing alone, one whom no one will own, To be ready to stake, for another man's sake, it takes courage to be true... Krishn remains an enigma. He is deep blue. We admire the blue pre-dawn hours. The waters of the ocean look blue from afar. But if you go near and take it in your palms, you will no longer find it blue; it will be very clear, transparent. The oceans continue to remain an enigma. ... Sri Krishn too is just like the deep blue waters of the ocean: Achintya (inscrutable, enigmatic). Thus, he is often shown as having a dark-blue complexion: not just blue, but a deep blue, like the velvet blue/indigo that sometimes can be seen in a dark sky, like a blue that one may have at times seen from the deck of a ship thousands of miles from shore on the Pacific Ocean or perhaps on the Atlantic Ocean. ... And whenever there is something of unfathomable depth, it appears to be deep blue. ... Sri Krishn is like a deep and mighty river flowing through the history of our nation. The Mahabharata would have been very different without him. He was the fulcrum. I mean, what would the Pandavas have done without Krishn by their side? This transcendent man started out (as a mere boy) with tremendous disadvantage, found himself in the middle of events and circumstances so nebulous (that perhaps even its creators may not have fully understood). And yet, he worked tirelessly, ushered in/facilitated positive change, reformed, engaged, removed numerous roadblocks and obstacles, absorbed 'venom', cleared away the 'cobwebs' and 'toxin', 'healed', provided guidance, traced the trajectory, put in place a framework... set the ball rolling, so to speak. So much so that even some five millenniums down the line... his life and times, his work/ contributions, his vision, his indomitable spirit, his philosophy and advice remain as fresh and as relevant as ever. They are timeless and seminal, and will remain so ~ forever. He was approachable, not snobbish or aloof - though he may not have suffered fools gladly; and, he was neither a quitter nor impractical and unrealistic. He was not fond of stagnation, and did not let a political vacuum to follow important events, e.g. he did not let a 'vacuum' to aftercede Jarasandh. He was not someone who lives in a world of fantasy, nor was his ideas and thoughts un-doable or unattainable. Instead, he was a doer, a catalyst, a phenomenon, and a force of nature. He was a pathfinder, a trailblazer... with a tremendous ability to absorb 'toxin' and withstand 'venom'. This way: he alsomade the job easier for others. His presence, achievements and actions (all that he did, that is) in various 'manthan-s' brings about positive change, besides serving as a catalyst for other positivities and possibilities... ultimately, leading to a better society. Krishn also instructed (and inspired) through his own behavior (acharan) ~ the mark of a true teacher/guru. ~ Mrtyormā amrtam gamaya | From death, lead me unto immortality. ~ In His human form, Krishn did all that he did ~ through the sheer dint of his karm alone; his commitment and passion towards achieving his objectives is remarkable. So imagine the kind of vision he possessed, as well as the magnitude of his tenacity and determination; he not only put in his time but also his heart into it; and he was neither perfunctory nor condescending. He urges us into introspection; he guides and mentors, and yet, his focus remains unwavering; he keeps the goals and objectives above himself. [The goals and objectives: to reinvigorate the principles of "dharma" and "karm" ~ to help and guide humanity so as to create a better society.] He is without a doubt a supersonic genius of epic proportions. Super-Genius Reformer-Statesman. Soldier-Statesman par excellence (soldier against regression, pessimism, negativies and obscurantism, that is). Genius-est artist of all time. A genuine trailblazer. ... And, "Giridhari" ~ doer/achiever of Herculean/superhuman tasks (as well as the dispeller ["lifter"] of [the allegorical 'dark clouds' of] pessimism, despondency, confusion, hopelessness, decay, et al ~ the harbinger of sunshine.) He led by example, and instructed through his own behaviour (acharan). He stands out in a crowd; he is a leader, a hero, a legend; God in the flesh... and yet, an everyman. His message (to humanity) is nuanced/subtle. One needs to contemplate and deliberate deeply ~ to understand his life and purpose, so as to be able to fathom his karm, his message and his advise (to humanity). Only then will it percolate. And only then can the 'chrysalis metamorphose into a butterfly'. [Society and civilization consists of people; only when they change for the better (i.e. when they change their attitude/outlook and mindset for the better, when they shake off their slothfulness, obscurantism, apathy and so on)... negative aspects/'darkness' is dispelled. S/He comes to 'turn the wheel' (which would have stagnated, perhaps even coated with layers and layers of dust and grime/filth)... but the wheel needs to keep turning. There is no magic-wand of any kind whatsoever. And therefore, there is no alternative to karm yog. He isn't a grouch; in fact, he is a li'l mischievous, slightly playful... and yet he has a strong presence, is extremely on the ball, and exudes gravitas without breaking a sweat. [His intensity is balanced by his enthusiasm and energy. Smouldering looks (think Rafael Nadal). Dark hair, and dark smouldering eyes (think Gregory Peck and Roger Federer). He is animated, unassuming and a brilliant polymath. His mind: vast and voraciously curious (~ extraordinary virtuosity). His demeanour: pleasant. His appearance: mesmerizing smile, naughty yet innocent looks - possibly chiseled and with big, captivating eyes. ~ He is a study in versatility - he has uncountable sides to his personality that just makes the whole package even more intriguing/enigmatic. ... Thoughtful, capable, and fascinating; steely willpower, a quiet kind of confidence: the physical presence, charisma and confidence of the Alpha male; but also unselfish, unpretentious, affable and genuine ~ an unassuming Alpha male with princely qualities.] Krishn, if we can understand him and his message, is no proponent of (any manner of) 'magic-wand theory'. His mantra is karm yog, and karm yog alone ~ action, dedicated/diligent action, even selfless action/service; the 'wheel needs to keep turning'.] The journey is immensely enriching; therefore, the journey is no less important than the destination... just as our business is with the action (karm) only, never with its fruits (result, outcome). And there is no instant results either. And so, pessimism is not an option; wallowing in self-pity, despondency and negativism/negativist mentality must be eschewed. [As you think, so you become. Think you are Brahmn; Brahmn you will become. ~ Your entire being, your karm, your thoughts... will reflect that.] Death is inevitable for all; a corpse is not even referred to by name: it just becomes a 'body' - a 'corpse' ~ for everyone. Thus, karm yog is essential for achieving 'eternal life' on Earth ~ Mrtyormā amrtam gamaya | From death, lead me unto immortality. And so, a great amount of karm (nishkam karm or selfless action/service - that contribute towards a better society) needs to be performed diligently and unselfishly... to attain 'moksha' ~ liberation from the material existence (the constant cycle of life, death and re-birth). || Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya Namah || 

Notes on Nishkam karm (selfless action); Jeevan Mukt (state of inner detachment);karm yogi (the man of action); the concept of caraṇa-ambujam/caraṇa-ambhojam or 'lotus feet' and Kara-puṣkara or 'lotus-palm'; Turyaga(the state of a Muni/Jnani/Yogi - a truly enlightened being); Sat-cit-ānanda (spiritual ecstasy or the state of eternal bliss - of the mind and soul); Self-realization or Param-aatma realization - communion with Brahmn/the Universal Consciousness), etc:Nishkamakarma is the dynamic power of duty exalted by inner detachment (Jeevan Mukt). It is freedom inaction, not freedom fromaction. As such, it is an expression of deepest dharma (dharmic consciousness). It is a Cause far greater than our individual selves. It is one of Life. It is one of Right and Truth - of our fundamental being. It is through disciplined karm that the individual comes to realize his or her true nature as well as his or her truepurpose. [In other words: only by performing good deeds indefinitely/continuously, sakama (selfish, glory-seeking) karm gets transformed into nishkam (selfless) karm.] ... It is then that one transcends the dualism of hope and despondency, gain and loss, joy and sorrow, hate and personal desire. It is then that one's heart becomes larger than the universe itself. ~ Wisdom is firmly set. Material desire (for praise, or glory or thoughts of achieving 'eternal life' or moksha etc) is replaced by the desire of the soul and the realization of this inner self - one's truebeing - as part of a greater Whole, which is the proper goal of all one's striving. BG 6.3: || For the wise who seeks to attain yoga Karma-yoga is said to be the means; For the one who has attained yoga, Equanimity becomes the means || [Yoga or Yog does not mean complicated physical manoeuvers/exercises; instead, it is the science of achieving complete harmony ~ of the body, mind and spirit. It results in sanjog (connection between all three). It calms the mind, brings about (inner) detachment and bliss/spiritual ecstasy, and generates synergy; in short: it activates kundalini.] BG 6.4: || A person is said to have attained yogic perfection When there is no desire for sense gratification (desire for personal glory, praise, etc), Or attachment to the fruits of work (result/outcome), And has renounced all personal selfish motives(desire for 'eternal life' or 'moksha', etc) || BG 6.7: || For one who has conquered the mind, the Universal Consciousness/Brahmn/Supreme Self (Param-aatma) is already reached, for s/he has attained tranquility. To such a person happiness and distress, heat and cold, praise and humiliation are all the same || Those who are endowed with the knowledge of selfless action - renouncing all motives of personal glory etc - perform their actions without attachment to their consequences (fruits). They are not carried away by success or depressed by lack of quick results, but enjoy mental equanimity. Nothing can affect their resolve. Thus, they have achieved sovereign control of the mind and through it that inner freedom, which provides for unity of thought, word and deed - which is the hallmark of Aryan consciousness ('Arya Dharma'). The advantage that flows from the performance of selfless action may be summarized quite briefly. No longer is one subject to the senses or to that which lies without. Rather, the imperative of dharma as detached (freedom from attachment) duty now reveals its own intrinsic values of dignity, purity and sublimity. It must be emphasized that selfless actiondoes not suggest unconcern for a given goal or purpose. Indeed, implicit in the very concept is the idea of a cause,or purpose, beyond the interests of the individual (a cause much higher than oneself - for the greater good/Loka Kalyana or Loka-sangraha), which provides the necessary field for action. And there can be no higher cause than Loka Kalyana or Loka-sangraha (the greater good - for a better society and civilization). ~ Krishn was a most extraordinary figure. He led by example, and instructed through his own behaviour (acharan). His was the highest dharmic mission; and by his very appearance, he not only reinvigorated the principles of dharma (dharma-samsthapanarthaya), he also urged (advised) humanity to action (karm) - to duty. To karm yog. ~ Work for a greater cause, but work in detachment ('Jeevan Mukt'). Try not to feel upset if you are unsuccessful (i.e. do not achieve instant results). Try not to feel pride if you are successful. If people insult/disparage you, be indifferent/stoic. If they praise you, don't feel exalted. Feel indifferent. Cultivate equanimity and equipoise. That is intrinsic to karm yog. ~ Struggle (continuous effort) does not necessarily guarantee (instant) success; but without it, no positive change is possible. And the call to struggle is called - duty. The higher cause (for Loka Kalyana or Loka-sangraha - the greater good) and the struggle (continuous effort) alone should inspire our thoughts and actions. The struggle, however, is one of protractionextending over decades and generations. It cannot be sustained by ephemeral passions or the whims of the moment, but only by focused and unrelenting resolve which is unaffected by the vagaries of success and setback. Therefore, it is important to cultivate the yoga of struggle (karm yog; equanimity and equipoise). ~ BG 2.15:  || yam hi na vyathayanty ete purusam purusarsabha sama-duhkha-sukham dhiram so 'mrtatvaya kalpate || ~ "O noble one [Arjun], that person of wise judgment equipoise in happiness and distress, and is steady in both, is certainly eligible for 'eternal life' (could also mean moksha/liberation)." | ~ Through the practice of selfless action, we achieve equanimity and efficiency. It is this efficiency of all those working in concert for the common cause which is the prerequisite for positive societal change. By choosing to become instruments of this higher cause (for Loka Kalyana or Loka-sangraha - the greater good) and struggle (continuous effort) ~ one becomes part of a higher destiny. Therefore, (Krishn's advise is): do your duty. Let your life become one with the Cause of the greater whole. That, and that alone. That is nishkam karm and karm yog. ~ If everyone concerned were to embrace the higher cause (leading to the greater good - a better society/world/civilization) and act upon it with dedication and consistency, the struggle (continuous effort) could certainly be mastered, no matter the odds. It requires staying-power (dharmic stamina and steadfastness). One cannot grow weary and give up, without committing themselves unreservedly to the struggle (cause, continuous effort). Instead of being active participants in their own destiny, humanity cannot become idlers and spectators. The higher Cause is impossible and hopeless for the weak-minded (in his or her own subjective judgment); it is not objectively hopeless or impossible for those worthy of it. For the former, this lame attitude is the (result of) expectation of quick, easy, painless results. If a certain outcome is not realized within a set period of time, they tend to despair, and (therefore) give up... and the whole enterprise is abandoned. Forgotten completely are earlier protestations of concern about the condition of the world/society/civilization and the need for a better one. Ironically, it is this very focus on fixed (quick, tangible) results, rather than on fulfillment of duty (steadfast karm/effort with inner detachment), which obscures the vision and blinds one to those possibilities which might otherwise open up as a by-product of correct thinking and acting, and thus lead to that very change they all seek. Amidst all the talk of the need for positive change (positive societal change), this fixation on (instant) outcome quickly leads to frustration and despair when success is not easily and readily achieved. But this attitude - this mental posture - is wrong and self-defeating. It is therefore prudent to shun such an attitude/outlook, and detach oneself. [i.e. cultivate equanimity and equipoise - for inner detachment. This would give freedom in action, not freedom from action.] ~ The ancient Aryans called it nishkâmakarma - action without attachment (to karmphal/outcome), action without personal desire (for quick/instant results, for personal glory, etc). It is selfless endeavor, efficient (and continuous) action without fear or doubt, and may be defined as the performance of one's duty without desire for the fruits of one's action(s). [Here there is no regard for personal glory of any kind. One might say that it is simply a matter of doing the dharmic thing (for a better society/civilization) - not for the results or outcome, not out of desire for personal glory or praise. Nothing more, nothing less.] Put another way, selfless actionis disciplined action directed toward a goal greater than one's own personal whims and interests; a higher cause - for the greater good (Loka Kalyana or Loka-sangraha). It is about becoming part of a higher destiny. The man of action (karm yogi) does not withdraw and turn inward, but cheerfully embraces struggle and toil as the ideal in life. For him or her, selflessness consists of the renunciation of personal desire (a carefree life, etc), not of action itself. Restraint and discipline of the senses (inner detachment/Jeevan Mukt) must, accordingly, not be seen as selfish ends in themselves, enabling one to escape from the rigours of life. Rather - along with action itself - they are to be considered a means by which one is able to discharge one's duty in the service of a higher cause (~ such a one is a hamsan, yogi or karm yogi). [And *this* should also help us to understand the concept of caraṇa-ambujam/caraṇa-ambhojam or 'lotus feet' as well as the concept of Kara-puṣkara or 'lotus-palm'. ... And why the spirit of such persons is spotless, like the lotus in the muddy water that remains "detached" (does not adhere to it.) Or like the hamsah/swan... whose feathers do not get damp despite remaining in contact with water. ~ Thus the lotus flower and the hamsah/swan are embodiments of (inner) "detachment" (Jeevan Mukt)... and exemplify a true "yogi", a real ascetic/hamsan or sanyaasi (Jeevan Mukt: one who is detached like the lotus... which grows in muddy water and yet remains Nirmal - untouched by it.) ~ It is the mark of an enlightened, higher soul (mahatmanah).]Thus, selfless actiondoes not suppress the senses, but merely sublimates them - spiritualizes them - for a higher purpose. [~ For the individual Aryan karm yogi there could be no promise of success. That, by definition, would rob him or her of the opportunity for the heroic deed (performed for the greater good or as part of a greater cause). Without selfless actionand the dharmic freedom (inner detachment) it bestows, however, no Aryan victory (to bring about positive change within oneself and/or in society) could be achieved.] 

There are two components to the concept of selfless action: selflessness,or (inner) detachment (Jeevan Mukt), and action.While, on the one hand, it calls for non-desire (from personal glory or praise, etc) and selflessness, it also calls for action - for doing. The first component, (inner) detachment, is simply the removal of the mind from all extraneous distraction and the devoted, disciplined, single-minded concentration toward a higher spiritual and dharmic purpose. Selfless action insists on the exclusion of all personal inclination and desire (for instant results, glory, praise, a carefree life, etc) - all consideration of pleasure or pain, success or failure (lack of quick results) - from the dharmic equation. The sole focus of its concern is the objective values of loyaltyand diligentpurposefulness in the service of a higher cause. Indeed, genuine dharmic life consists in giving up egoistic (ahamkara, negative pride or vainglorious) instincts and embracing such values. The converse of selfishness, of course, is selfishness,or personal attachment (for praise, glory, etc). Because of its attachment, action so undertaken tends to be flighty and fickle. And because it cannot be sustained, it cannot offer the prospect of victory in a protracted struggle (i.e. the desired positive societal change). When the mind is attached to objects of the senses and to that which lies without, mental focus and rational stability are impaired, as is concentration and steadfastness. As a result, such attachment (of the senses, or for quick results, personal glory, etc) leads to inconstancy and lack of direction. But when the mind is withdrawn from sense-objects and given dharmic direction (inner detachment, steadfast karm/effort with equanimity and equipoise), this fleeting flux of desires vanishes and dharmic fixity is established. [i.e. sakama (selfish, glory-seeking) karm gets transformed into nishkam (selfless) karm.] Acquiring such disciplined mental disposition is an essential prerequisite for the development of an attitude that alone will enable one to practice selfless action. 'Coz no longer will they be subservient (under the influence) to the senses but have attained that sovereignty, which we may describe as consciousness of the soul. The mind - having acquired an attitude of concentration and equipoise - is thus balanced, and (therefore) is now free to establish its sovereignty and dharmic authority. [i.e. The mind is Sattvic, immune from worldly thoughts.] ~ It is the state of Turyaga. [Note: Turyaga is the state of a Muni/Jnani/"yogi" - a truly enlightened being; it leads to (inner) "detachment" (Jeevan Mukta) ~ allowing one to enter into nirvikalpa samadhi to 'awaken' to "Moksha" (liberation). Such a person can do seemingly impossible tasks with ease - the allegorical 'Giridhari' ~ also the dispeller ("lifter") of (the metaphoric 'dark and heavy clouds' of) pessimism, despondency, confusion, hopelessness, decay, et al... the harbinger of joy and hope and the bringer of sunshine. Such a person is also "Siddha" - one whose heart is larger than the universe itself: one who has achieved the eternal bliss/spiritual ecstasy of "self-realization" ~ Sat-cit-ānanda. 

BG 2.72: || esa brahmi sthitih paartha nainam prapya vimuhyati sthitvasyam anta-kale 'pi brahma-nirvanam rcchati || ~ "O Paartha [O Son of Prtha/Kunti], having gained the realization of the Ultimate Truth (Ultimate Consciousness/Self-realization), one is never again deluded and even at the end of one's life, being situated in this state, liberation from the material existence (moksha) and attainment of the Ultimate Consciousness (Brahmn) is assured." | ~ When the mind is withdrawn from the sense objects and deep reflection sets in, the objective consciousness is 'closed'; Savitarka Samadhi commences. This is Samadhi with reasoning. The mind here is free from worldly thoughts; negative thoughts (or thoughts about personal glory, etc) cannot enter now. The mind is Sattvic. (It can be called Chitta Suddhi.) When the mind is completely absorbed in one object of meditation, it is termed Samadhi. Karm Yog is also a kind of meditation. It destroys the ego (negative pride, ahankara, vainglory). And, it requires complete self-sacrifice of Nishkam Karm Yog (selfless action/service). Such yogis are Nishkam Karm Yogis. ... And only they can achieve Nirvikalpa Samadhi to 'awaken' to Moksha (liberation). [Shri Krishn was not given to vainglory. Instead, he was a nishkam karm yogi, a true "yogi" and Jnani, a Param-hamsah (Supreme Swan).] The state of Nirvikalpa Samadhi leads to (inner) detachment/Jeevan Mukt. In nirvikalpa samadhi there is infinite bliss. (Sat-cit-ānanda, pronounced as: sach-chid-ānanda - one who has achieved eternal bliss of self-realization. Sat describes an essence that is pure and timeless; cit is consciousness; ānanda is absolute bliss or spiritual ecstasy.) One not only feels bliss, but also actually grows into that bliss (of the body, mind and spirit/soul). [Yoga or yog does not indicate some complicated physical manoeuvers; instead, it is the science of achieving complete harmony ~ of the body, mind and spirit. It calms the mind, leads to inner detachment and (therefore) bliss/spiritual ecstasy... and generates synergy; in short: it activates kundalini. (Probably, "yog" or "yoga" has given rise to "sanjog"/"sanyog", to connect. ~ When the mind is Sattvic (free from worldly thoughts, or thoughts of personal glory, etc) and is completely absorbed in one object of meditation, it is termed Samadhi. Meditation (dhyan) is also Yoga or Yog; it not only helps in achieving complete harmony of the body, mind and spirit, but also helps in connecting with the energies of the cosmos. It activates and unleashes the power of kundalini... that in turn illumines or 'ignites' the mind.] ~ BG 10.20: || aham atma gudakesha sarva-bhutasaya-sthitah aham adis ca madhyam ca bhutanam anta eva ca|| ~ "I am the Supreme Spirit (Supersoul/Atman), O Arjun, seated in the hearts of all living entities. I am the beginning, the middle and the end of all beings." | ~ When one enters into nirvikalpa samadhi, one's heart is larger than the universe itself. One 'sees' the universe as a tiny dot inside one's vast heart. (Aham Brahmasmi ~ I am He/Brahmn: one (the jiva) achieves communion with the Universal Consciousness.) ~ One reflects the light of every being in the universe, and one's light is reflected in them. One can feel the expansiveness of one's being... an expression of the infinite field of intelligence and all possibilities. ~ Becoming one with the soul is possible only in the Nirvikalpa Samadhi state. (Should one hold communion with Brahmn [the Universal Consciousness], devoid of mental fancies/attachments and modifications, then the great bondage of the mind will cease, all doubts will vanish, all pratibandha or vighna [impediments of the mind and spirit] will disappear, and all [negative] karmas will perish.) ~ It is then [i.e. only after attaining the stage of Nirvikalpa Samadhi] that one gains Realization of God and the Self [i.e. Self-realization or Param-aatma realization.] ~ It is then that Jiva [the human soul or individual soul] becomes identical with Brahmn [the Param-aatma or Supersoul (Atman) or the Universal Consciousness.] ~ Self-realization (or Param-aatma realization) is to fully know and realize who you are. Before knowing God/Universal Consciousness (Brahmn), know yourself. If you understand yourself... only then is it possible to understand God (Universal Consciousness/Brahmn), Nature or Love. With the realization of the Universal Consciousness (Atman/Supersoul/Param-aatma/Brahmn) come universal compassion, love, and the awareness of the oneness of all things (higher knowledge).]

The light of thy music illumines the world. The life breath of thy music runs from sky to sky. The holy stream of thy music breaks through all stony obstacles and rushes on.


|| Gaaner leela'r sei kinare
J'og dite ki saw'bai pare
Bishva hrida'y parabare
Raag rginir jaal phelate ||


Aamar Byala Je Jaye by the Queen of Sangeet:


  
...................................................

Amreekandesi: Master’s Of America by Atulya Mahajan

$
0
0

Atulya Mahajan's debut novel Amreekandesi: Master's Of America is a decent one-time fun read. Choc-a-bloc with all the clichés one can think of about a middle-class Indian boy's journey to the "land of opportunity"... and subsequent events, complete with all the troubles, travails, struggles, disorientation, lifestyle changes, reality checks, road trips, matters of the heart, Indian English and an alien education system. The author covers almost every aspect of a desi student's life in the US of A: right from reading Barron's GRE guides, running around institutes for GRE coaching, using new words and American lingo (in everyday conversations), applying to colleges, getting recommendation letters, visa interviews, tickets, packing (to accommodate an assortment of desi snacks, masala, et al); bidding farewell to friends, withstanding endless advises from family, friends and the much-revered neighbourhood uncle (whose high-achieving-greatly-admired son already resides in the hallowed land; uncle isn't too pleased though, to share that halo henceforth). There's also the subdued drive to the airport (luggage bursting at the seams in tow), emotional farewell, take-off from Indian shores, connecting flights, foreign airports, landing in an alien land, Indian community @ campus, helpful seniors, new desi friends, classes, assignments, academic rigour, hard work, superior facilities, stern but compassionate professor, desi food ... graduation day ceremony - Mahajan has pretty much covered all facets of a desistudent's life in the US.

Not surprising, since the author himself has 'been there, done that'.

In Amreeka there are no roadside vendors selling cut fruits, coconut slices or assorted papads. There are no beggars either, and homeless persons did not appreciate a plate of rajma chawal and kheer. And yes, there's the bit about FOBs (Fresh off the Boat) and ABCDs (second generation Indian Americans, derided as 'American-Born Confused Desi'). There's a smattering of Indian English too: what's your 'good name'? Myself so-and-so. 'I will give you a ring tomorrow,' and the like.

The story revolves around two boys who dream to fly off to America for a better future. Akhil Arora, an engineer from Delhi. Jaspreet Singh (aka Jassi aka Jazz) from a small town in the Punjab. Both get to live their dream in Florida State University (FSU). They become friends and share an apartment with Kedar (a Math major). The trio gel well and call themselves The MSketeers. Kedar, being the joker, always clowns around and cracks jokes. Their other desifriends are Sundar, Venkat, Dilpreet and Ruksh - who go out of their way to help the newcomers settle in. Sundar even lays out a delicious dinner for a tired and jet-lagged Akhil and his dad, courtesy ready-to-eat frozen food: parantha with saag paneer (which so revives Akhil's spirits that he takes to it like Popeye to spinach.)

They shop for grocery, cook, host parties and get-togethers, visit beaches and Disneyland, celebrate festivals with fellow Indian students, and like every Indian fresh out of India, they convert everything into rupees (... and end up goggle-eyed and wobbly-kneed.) Of course, they gradually learn to just roll their eyes and move on. They are also pleasantly surprised on being handed back the precise balance amount... instead of Cadbury éclairs candy.

During Lakshmi Puja - since none of them (neither Akhil nor any of his friends, that is) know the entire Lakshmi Aarti by heart, they perform the puja with the 20-odd Indian heads bowed in reverence as Anoop Jalota sings praises of Goddess Lakshmi on YouTube. After prasad (halwa), the most important thing (that everybody was waiting for) is laid out: food. 'For the next one hour, everybody ate, and ate some more. Dilpreet handed out Hajmolas at the end.'

They make it to Subway, ask for vegetarian options, and are given two choices: Veggie Patty or Veggie Delite. And since the word 'delight' sounded better, they promptly opt for the latter. Thereafter they come across a whole bunch of bread in fancy sounding names: whole wheat, parmesan oregano, etc. And since they also want capsicum with their Veggie Delite, they try their bestest to communicate it (Capsicum. Cap-see-cum?) ... Only to be told it was bell pepper.

During their infrequent road trips they stay in Potels (Patel owned Motels). And are fascinated by how a hard-working, entrepreneurial community had achieved its American dream by providing Americans comfortable places to dream. Along the way they also discover quaint little Indian restaurants... and immediately get busy with the sumptuous spread on offer: chicken tikka, paneer butter masala, dal makhani, and gulab jamun (for dessert). Only Ruksh looks on wistfully at the chicken tikka - tuesday vrat coming in the way.

They get-together with other friends and chat over a delicious meal of rajma chawal, egg curry and frozen paranthas. For someone who had not cooked even a simple dal in India, Akhil gradually learns to whip up full meals, while Jassi prides himself on his ability to make Maggi noodles and boiled eggs without burning them. They also discover there's no aloo-tikki burger in America, but hunger pangs compel a vegetarian Akhil into eating chicken sandwiches (and since 'it tasted like paneer,' he finishes it off in a couple of minutes.)

They make some American friends too and learn about the latter's experiences in India. Jassi goes to watch his first football game (an inter-university game) with Nigel and some others - American football, not the one Indians knew. That was soccer.

Akhil is a decent, sincere and studious chap, sometimes homesick. He is determined to prove himself and make his parents happy ('coz with FSU not being in the top 100 US universities, they are worried about his future.) He plans to return to India after a few years, and eventually falls in love with Nandita - a fellow FSU student he had met on the flight to America.

Jassi, on the other hand, is the cool dude (or at least that is what he thinks of himself). He wishes to live the American dream, a la the movie "American Pie". He is embarrassed by his Indian identity and so, plans to look for an American girl... and settle down in Amreeka. Jassi, unlike Akhil, has no intentions of returning to his country, ever. His character is essentially that of an average Joe... dreaming of bikini-clad girls, beaches and Pamela-ji (in no particular order, though.) However, a few of the incidents involving him are somewhat over-the-top.

But here's a funny one:

"'Hi Victoria,' he finally managed.
'Whoa there. Looks like somebody's working hard to get rid of the love handles.'
'Love handles?' Jassi's ears stood at alert at the mention of love.
She laughed loudly. 'Oh, these.' She grabbed a tire of fat on Jassi's side.
She touched him, and Jassi knew that he was back in business. In his mind, there was no doubt that Victoria was definitely interested in him."

There's also the desi tadka offered by Akhil's dad who addresses Mindy as "Miss Bhindi" - to register his pique, attempts to haggle, turns up at a popular convenience store (managed by desis) armed with notepad and pen... all in a bid to prove how much they overcharge. He also eyes Akhils's new friends with nervous suspicion... imagining his precious son turning into a drug addict dancing to dum maaro dum on the streets of America, while wearing yellow coloured bell-bottom pants and shirts with red and orange floral patterns. On their first visit to a famous Mexican fast food joint Mr. Gyaneshwar Arora takes one bite of his Burrito, puts it down and opens up the wrap. Then discovering it is 'just rajma wrapped in a lousy roti' (for which they have paid 5 dollars!), he chides Dilpreet for calling it 'Mexican food'. Dilpreet only manages to smile while wondering what he would say when he found out that Taco Bell also served kidney beans with rice: Rajma chawal. (No wonder some of his friends refer to Taco Bell as Taco Balle Balle, for its closeness to Punjabi tradition.)

The unfit Arora Sr. also manages to run after a 'tall, very strongly built man with a bald head and green eyes' - to respond to the latter's casual "How are you doing?" And after striking up an acquaintance, tries to pass himself off as an Indian prince. Akhil (of course) gets to meet a strongly built man with green eyes and a shiny bald head - David Apostolov, Director (Admissions), Dept. of Computer Science, FSU. Prof. Apostolov taught the database course and 'had the demeanour of an African lion that had just escaped from captivity'. But Akhil's dimaag-ki-battidoesn't flicker until much later. Until a 'tall, very strongly built man with a bald head and green eyes' congratulates him on his successful presentation to Google - with the following words: 'Well done, Akhil. "Your people" must be so happy. Do you guys have some kind of celebration in your kingdom when the prince completes a degree?' Needless to say, Akhil nearly choked on hearing those words.

Meanwhile, Goyal-ji's supposedly star son, Priyank, prefers to call himself "Perry" in this fabled land. (Goyal-ji is Akhil's advise-dispensing-samosa-gulab-jamun-devouring neighbour, mentioned earlier.)

Mr. Arora's character is enjoyable, while Goyal-ji and "Perry" are plain amusing.

My twopenceworth: Though Mahajan has included witty insights and humorous anecdotes while chronicling the experiences of an immigrant (including identity crises, trying to find their feet in a foreign land, attempts to live India away from India et al) - none of it can be called novel. However, given Mahajan's neat writing style, you end up enjoying the journey till the end. Very few editing errors, and that adds to the reading pleasure. The book jacket cover is quite funky.

But the book is a tad too long, at some places the story just drags on. Needlessly. Some sharp editing... to prune out these unnecessary and over-the-top bits would make it more crisp.

My rating:3/5. Predictable, but a fun read nevertheless. 

Don't expect a "Dil Chahta Hai" or a "3 Idiots" set in Amreeka. It's not in the genre of Nagesh Kukunoor's path-breaking "Hyderabad Blues" too. And it's not up there with Anurag Mathur's hugely popular "The Inscrutable Americans" either. The latter is a timeless polished read with intensity and depth, an unabashedly humourous take (tinged with pathos) on the travails of a simpleton, a small town Indian boy, who goes to the U.S. to pursue his higher studies... and is confronted with myriad culture shocks. This book has achieved cult status now. There's no comparison whatsoever.


About Atulya Mahajan: Atulya Mahajan is an Indian author and is the creator of the Indian satire blog amreekandesi.com. Professionally a technologist in an investment bank, Mahajan went to the US in 2004 to complete his Master's degree. He worked there for five years and then returned to India. He started this blog while studying in the US and used it as a platform to share his experiences of people living in a foreign land. Besides this blog, Mahajan also works with the Crest Edition of The Times of India as a columnist and writes occasional humor.

Details of the book:Amreekandesi: Master’s Of America/ Author: Atulya Mahajan/ Publisher: Ebury Press, an imprint of Random House India/ Binding: Paperback/ Publishing Date: 2013/ Genre: Fiction/ ISBN: 978-8-184-00395-6/ ISBN-13: 9788184003956/ Pages: 310/ Price: INR 199.

Picture:The book jacket cover of Amreekandesi: Master’s Of America. Courtesy: link

Happy Birthday! by Meghna Pant

$
0
0

A financial journalist with NDTV Profit and Bloomberg-UTV,Meghna Pant inhabits two worlds: the quantitative world of finance and the creative world of storytelling. She has reported from the New York Stock Exchangeand has met and interviewed a galaxy of personalities representing politics, business and entertainment.Happy Birthday! (July 2013, Random House India) is her second offering in as many years. One & A Half Wife (May 2012, Westland) - Meghna's bestselling debut novel - was shortlisted for a clutch of awards, including the Amazon Breakthrough Novel Award and the Cinnamon Press Novel Writing Award. It received critical and commercial acclaim, and went into multiple reprints. And thereupon began her writerly journey...
About the book:Happy Birthday! is a celebration of the complex, mysterious inner lives of our fellow human beings, by the award-winning novelist Meghna Pant. A dedicated friend undertakes one last labour of love for a childless woman. Nadia - married into money - finds herself facing uncomfortable truths about her comfortably numb marriage. A retired civil servant of modest means struggles to support his snooty foreign-returned daughter. And so on...
Meghna Pant's knife-sharp stories are compelling, emotionally intelligent and provide a rare glimpse into the strange workings of the human heart. They evade neat categorization, and are the perfect read for all curious spirits.'
My twopenceworth: The jacket cover is tastefully done; it exudes joy and serenity. However, the title is misleading - perhaps deliberately so, and each balloon (on the cover) contains a story vignette. Happy Birthday! And Other Stories is a collection of thirteen many-flavoured and thought-provoking tales that make for a compelling read. Of myriads of layers... they are akin to peeling shallots; each tale is a slice-of-life; realties we see around us, realities we do not pay much attention to... realities we'd rather ignore. And forget. The stories are not interconnected, but unlike random brushstrokes on a canvas or a series of linked vignettes... they resemble a multi-hued kaleidoscope. Impactful, the stories are sure to leave their imprint on the readers and stay with them for a long time. 'The Gecko on the Wall' and 'Clip and Cane' are a tad predictable, while 'Friends' and 'Happy Birthday' (the title story) is not all that novel... though you'd still want to read them. The pages turn easily... but none of the stories make for a breezy read. And so, one can only put this down to a.) their content and b.) Meghna's simple-yet-powerful writing style. However, 'The Gola Master','Lemon and Chilli' and 'Hoopsters' are quite well-crafted; they bring forth a multitude of emotions in the reader: sometimes funny-yet-moving, at other times heartbreaking-but-never-sentimental.'Shoulder Blades' is somewhat underdone (or maybe overdone - can't quite make up my mind). Perhaps the author's pen lost focus a wee bit. Or, maybe, it's a bit of both. In'The Message', 'The Bailout', 'After Ashes', etc ~ the emotions are many and complicated.
~ Umm, I wouldn't like to play spoilsport. So, do grab a copy and read all you can. The few editing errors are easy to let go. Hopefully, the author will continue perfecting the precision of her language and attention to detail, the seamless shifts of moods, feelings and emotions, and the novelty and logic of her storytelling - to bring before us every shade of human behaviour.
Here are a few lines from Hoopsters:
"We enter a narrow muddy path with jhopadpattis on both sides. Lalit apologetically turns his head towards me; the car can move no further. Seven or eight dusty children in ragged clothes surround our car, their noses pressed flat against the windows, their teeth white through the tinted glass. If we leave the car here they'll scratch the silver-grey paint, sit on the hood or steal the rear-view mirrors, so I tell Lalit, 'I don't trust these slum people. I think you better stay in the car.'

'Memsahib, I can take you to Mary's house,' he says gently.

'How would you know the way around this kachra place?' I ask. 'I live here,' he says, and our eyes meet in the mirror.

I look away and croak a reply, 'Wait for us here.'
He nods his head slowly as Sara and I squeeze through the small space between the car and the corrugated iron wall of a jhopadpatti. The children scatter."
Rating:3.5/5.  

Meghna Pant is a gifted storyteller, a unique voice... and someone to look out for in the future.
 
Details of the book:Happy Birthday! And Other Stories/ Author: Meghna Pant/ Publisher: Vintage Books, an imprint of Random House India/ Binding: Paperback/ Language: English/ Publishing Date: 2013/ Genre: Fiction/ ISBN-10: 8184004038 ISBN-13: 9788184004038/ Pages: 296/ Price: INR 299.

Picture:The book jacket cover of Happy Birthday! Courtesy: link.

Ghanta College: The Art of Topping College Life by Clyde D'Souza

$
0
0


Ghanta College: The Art of Topping College Life is (author) Clyde D'Souza's (somewhat cumourously-titled, that's a portmanteau made from 'curious' and 'humourous') second offering. It's not a book of short stories; it's not a novel or novella either. Its 'humour' and non-fiction, though the eye-catching book jacket cover somewhat flatters to deceive. ~ Some writers seem to achieve an effortless humour. But then, humour is very difficult to get right, and it is almost impossible to define what makes something "funny", particularly in books. 

Book blurb:'... For the first time in India comes a non-pakao book that gives students straight answers to nervous questions. ... The ultimate college guide as you go from nervous fresher to confident graduate. With true college stories from celebrities and gyan in the form of Professor's Tips, Topper's Secrets, and Nerd's Warnings, if there’s any book you even pretend to read during college, make it Ghanta College.' 

About the book (along with my twopenceworth): The author has given some tips on how to have fun in college and manage the academics. There are some quick solutions (or even consolation, and some purportedly entertaining snippets) on how one should spend the last few days in school, besides some tips on how to go about choosing the right college, being cool, hostel life, and so on.

Umm, did I say some purportedly entertaining snippets? ... Well, make that some (purportedly) quick solutions or even consolation. That's because D'Souza has tried too hard - to be humourous, funny and cool. He has tried his bestest to make it all seem full of wit and wisdom... the sort that tickles the funny bone and bring a smile to your face, or will have you laughing out loud. ~ The end result is somewhat underwhelming (though there are some bits of spontaneous fun and humour.) However, it could have been a quick and informal read, an unboring read (though, without any take-away or lasting effect) - if only it had been more free-flowing and compact, and paired with inventive situations. That way it would have capitalized on a promising premise, instead of being tripped up by (a somewhat) poor/tepid execution. Having said that, it could still work for you... but for that you will have to read the book to find out.

Ghanta College has 11 chapters: Leaving School; Choosing a College; Fresher Year; Academics; Being Cool; Dating & Relationships; Parties & Dancing; Hostel Life; Internet & Mobile; Alcohol & Drugs, and Beyond College. ~ They cover topics like: The Last Day in School; Bluffmaster Guide on Board Exams; Types of College; The Classroom Map; Student Stereotypes; Time Table vs Timepass Table; Bluffmaster Guide to Classroom; Canteen Behaviour; Bluffmaster Guide on Bunking; Extra-curricular Activities; The Party Guide; Typical Roomies; Hostel Food; Dropping Out, and so on.

The Guest Lecturers are: TV personality Rajiv Lakshman, Singer Ramona Arena, Author Vrushali Telang, IIT dude Gaurav Sahni and Stand Up Comedian Chris Lazarus.

Here is an excerpt from 'Types of College':

'K-JO College: This is the kind of college you dream of securing admission to - a place where the college building looks like it's been licked everyday by the Principal himself. The students can easily pass off as actors and have equally befitting surnames like Kapoor and Khan. Everyone drives a fancy car to college and there's always one poor kid (how did he get there, I wonder?) madly in love with a rich guy's daughter.

Three Idiots College: This type of college is marked by hardcore studying, corridors filled with bespectacled geeks on the verge of a new invention, and most importantly, NO GIRLS.

Emraan Hashmi College: You could refer to this kind as the Madhur Bhandarkar College. Everyone looks normal, like they actually travel by train, have pimples, and look as ordinary and real as...well...Emraan.'

.................................

On the issue of dropping out, however, D'Souza rightly points out that famous dropouts (like Mark Zuckerberg) did not get bitten by the genius bug one night, got up the next morning and created Facebook. ~ That in truth these guys were already ahead of the curve and possibly found formal education a little too slow for them. And that: even if they were out of the system they spent much of time poring over textbooks - teaching themselves without the help of professors and help from fellow students. ~ That takes a lot of motivation, a cool intellect and single-minded ambition. Bottomline: They did not 'drop out' to escape studying.

Rating: I am going with a 2/5 for Clyde D'Souza's latest.

There aren't too many editing errors. But it could have been a sparkling (time-pass) read or (at least) a good time-pass read... full of fun and wit, instead of a convoluted and laboured one - if only the author had been less conscious about making it humourous.


Details of the book: Ghanta College: The Art of Topping College Life/ Author: Clyde D'Souza/ Publisher: Ebury Press, an imprint of Random House India/ Binding: Paperback/ Language: English/ Publishing Date: September 2013/ Genre: Humour; Non-Fiction/ ISBN-10: 8184003765/ ISBN-13: 9788184003765/ Pages: 264/ Price: INR 199.

Picture:The book jacket cover of Ghanta College: The Art of Topping College Life. Courtesy: link.

The Old Man and the Sea by Ernest Hemingway

$
0
0


"But man is not made for defeat,"he said. "A man can be destroyed but not defeated."- Ernest Hemingway, The Old Man and the Sea.

Great quote.

Born (to Clarence and Grace Hemingway) on July 21, 1899, in Cicero (now in Oak Park), Illinois, Ernest Miller Hemingway served in World War I and worked in journalism before publishing his story collection In Our Time. He was renowned for novels like The Sun Also Rises, A Farewell to Arms, For Whom the Bell Tolls (nominated for the Pulitzer Prize), and The Old Man and the Sea, which won the 1953 Pulitzer.

Clarence and Grace Hemingway raised their son in this conservative suburb of Chicago, but the family also spent a great deal of time in northern Michigan, where they had a cabin. It was there that Hemingway learned to hunt, fish and appreciate the outdoors. In high school, Hemingway worked on his school newspaper, Trapeze and Tabula, writing primarily about sports. Immediately after graduation, the budding journalist went to work for the Kansas City Star, gaining experience that would later influence his distinctively stripped-down prose style. ~ While working as a foreign correspondent for the Star, Hemingway made the acquaintance of many of the great writers and artists of his generation, such as F. Scott Fitzgerald, Ezra Pound, Pablo Picasso and James Joyce.

Hemingway's first novel, The Sun Also Rises (1926) is widely considered his greatest work, artfully examining the postwar disillusionment of his generation. ~ His celebrated World War I novel A Farewell to Arms (1929), secured his lasting place in the literary canon. ... When he wasn't writing, Hemingway spent much of the 1930s chasing adventure: big-game hunting in Africa, bullfighting in Spain, deep-sea fishing in Florida. In 1951, Hemingway wrote The Old Man and the Sea, which would become perhaps his most famous book, finally winning him the Pulitzer Prize he had long been denied.

In 1954, Hemingway won the Nobel Prize (in Literature) "for his mastery of the art of narrative, most recently demonstrated in The Old Man and the Sea, and for the influence that he has exerted on contemporary style".

The Old Man and the Sea& my twopenceworth:Among Hemingway's later works, the most outstanding is (perhaps) this short novel, The Old Man and the Sea - the story of a Cuban fisherman who refuses to be defeated by nature.

"He was an old man who fished alone in a skiff in the Gulf Stream and he had gone eighty-four days now without taking a fish. In the first forty days a boy had been with him. But after forty days without a fish the boy's parents had told him that the old man was now definitely and finally salao, which is the worst form of unlucky, and the boy had gone at their orders in another boat which caught three good fish the first week. It made the boy sad to see the old man come in each day with his skiff empty and he always went down to help him carry either the coiled lines or the gaff and harpoon and the sail that was furled around the mast. The sail was patched with flour sacks and, furled, it looked like the flag of permanent defeat."

Though a slim volume, do not expect it to be a breezy read. Reading a classic requires lot of patience; this novella (Hemingway's last major work of fiction and published in his lifetime) packs in a lot... while meticulously chronicling the story of an old fisherman's journey - his long and lonely struggle with a giant Marlin and the sea, and his victory in defeat. [~ Hemingway said, "I was trying to show the experience of the fisherman so exactly and directly that it became part of the reader's experience."]

The Old Man and the Sea is in many ways a deceptively simple tale (especially given Hemingway's use of sparse, straight-forward prose). Santiago, the old Cuban fisherman, has had a significant run of bad luck (i.e., 84 days without taking a fish). "Everything about him was old except his eyes and they were the same colour as the sea and were cheerful and undefeated." Attempting to change his luck, he decides to take his skiff further out than he has ever gone before, "beyond all the people of the world." Eventually, he lands the largest Marlin he's ever seen and the bulk of the narrative details his epic struggle to reel in the fish and get it back to shore. “The fish is my friend too...I have never seen or heard of such a fish.”

"He rested sitting on the un-stepped mast and sail and tried not to think but only to endure."

"Every day is a new day. It is better to be lucky. But I would rather be exact. Then when luck comes you are ready."

... It takes some getting used to - in order to feel a connection to the story and/or be moved by the restrained power of the narrative.

Despite the many hardships and struggles that Santiago faces, or the epic battles he endures on the open sea (what with the elements, sharks and so on), one does not feel sorry for him. One does not pity him. ~ He is simply doing what he loves to do, it gave him purpose and fulfillment in life: struggling with an iron will to accomplish his goal. "I may not be as strong as I think, but I know many tricks and I have resolution."  The struggle is long, hard and difficult... but the reader only feels a great deal of admiration for Santiago. He is thin and gaunt. He lay cramping himself against the line with all of his body. The rope cuts his hands. His muscles strain. He talks to himself. He has no food or water. And yet he does not give up. He never loses hope or faith in himself.

"And what beat you, he thought. 'Nothing,' he said aloud. 'I went out too far.'"

"It is good to have an end to journey toward; but it is the journey that matters, in the end." - Ernest Hemingway.

The author's writing style coupled with spare dialogue and sparse simple prose can make this one a somewhat difficult-to-comprehend read: one that may not quite stir much within every reader. (~ So you will have to read and decide for yourself.)

However, this story can also mirror man's struggle with challenges (including old age and fading memory), and his indomitable will to win - with resoluteness or pride, no matter the odds. ~ To not be defeated. Come what may.

There's also reminiscing of/for youth and vitality. ~ Santiago is mentor and old age; Manolin, the boy, is pupil and youth. He loves and cares for Santiago. In him, the old man wishes to entrust his skill as a fisherman, and his memory.

Maybe the story in a way (metaphorically) also chronicles Hemingway's own struggle with depression and numerous conditions and ailments... that slowly but surely sapped his burly body and mind - even at the peak of his literary career. ["Most people were heartless about turtles because a turtle's heart will beat for hours after it has been cut up and butchered. But the old man thought, I have such a heart too." - Ernest Hemingway, The Old Man and the Sea.]

One never knows.

Santiago survives on a bottle of water and on (raw) dolphin fillets and a couple of flying fish (and eventually some of the marlin's flesh to sustain himself)... but ultimately succeeds in hauling the giant Marlin to shore to the collective wide-eyed admiration and awe - of tourists and fishermen alike. Upon his return (to his shack) delirious and exhausted, Santiago dreams of his youth - of lions on an African beach.

Though the great fish is now merely an 18-feet-long skeleton, its flesh eaten away by mako sharks, it is nevertheless a prized catch if there was one. It is the stuff legends are made of; it is (after all) the largest fish the villagers have ever known to come out of the Gulf Stream. It is to become a mute (yet permanent) testimony to Santiago's greatness. "There has never been such a fish." ~ It represents and brings Santiago the intangibles he craves... to give his existence meaning and dignity. It represents perseverance, hard work and also highlights the indomitable nature of the human spirit. ~ The boy, Manolin, too returns, eager to fish together, convinced he has much to learn. He no longer cares about luck anymore, or what his family might say. He professes his faith in Santiago (the old man) and everything he represents. ... And, when Manolin accepts the (marlin's) spear, he truly becomes his legatee; he accepts for all time everything that Santiago wishes to bequeath him.

Does it also symbolize Hemingway's last hurrah amidst his battle with deteriorating mental and physical health? ~ Well, my guess is as good as yours.


The book feels good to hold; hardly any editing errors - and that adds to the reading pleasure. The jacket cover is eye-catching; appropriate but could have been better.

~ Hemingway, known for his brevity and predilection for understatement, had a unique style. Here are a couple of his quotes:

1."Never confuse movement with action."

2."Write drunk, edit sober." 

Succinct, right?!


Details of the book: The Old Man and the Sea/ Author: Ernest Hemingway/ Publisher: Arrow Books, an imprint of Random House India/ Binding: Paperback/ Language: English/ Publishing Date: September 2013/ Genre: Fiction/ ISBN-10: 978-0-09-990840-1/ ISBN-13: 9780099908401/ Pages: 99/ Price: INR 110.

Picture:The book jacket cover of The Old Man and the Sea. Courtesy: link.

Notes on Sri Krishn, the Mahabharata ('The Great History of the Bharatas'), Indus Seals, etc.

$
0
0

[There has never been an Aryan Invasion. ~ A humble endeavour: Notes on Sri Krishn, the Mahabharata ('The Great History of the Bharatas'), etc ~ do read the post in its entirety... to grasp its scope et al.]

Bhagavad comes from Bhagavan (honorific for Ishvara/Ishvari) - 'the Eternal One'. Gita comes from Geet or Geeta - meaning "song". ~ Therefore, the Bhagavad-Gita means, the song of the Eternal One.In other words: the Song of the Primordial. Srimad is honorific. [~ The Sanskrit language is both erudite and mellifluous. With correct diction and timbre/tonal quality (which comes with practice, and practice makes perfect), it resonates; one can (then) even call it song. |Krishn speaks in sublime metaphors, allegories, similies, and so on. Therefore, literal translations or over-simplification is misleading. BG 10.32: || vādaḥ pravadatām aham || ~ "I am logic of the logician."|The Sanskrit language is not meant to be spoken from the tongue or even the voice-box (larynx), instead the words should emerge from within - like a perennial fountain or stream, thereupon it takes on a resonating quality. This is the essence of the Sanskrit language. ~ Devi Sarasvati is said to have invented Sanskrit, known as the mother of all languages, of scriptures and scholarship. The Goddess is also revered as the mother of the Vedas and as the mother of the Indian Civilization/Indus-Sarasvati Civilization/'Aryavarsha' (~ abode of the Arya people; land of the noble ones; Arya = noble, noble-natured or people who followed a pattern of life based on noble values. Varsha = continent, in Sanskrit. | The right-handed swastika symbol originated in ancient India and is the symbol of the mighty River SarasvatI as well as 'Aryavarsha' - also known as the Sindhu-SarasvatI Sabhyata/Civilization (~ possibly the oldest civilization in the world, and thus the cradle of civilization.) It is also the sign of Sanaatan Dharma. | Do refer the relevant passages on Aryavarsha, Swastika and the etymology of "Hindu" and "India".

The so-called 'Aryan blitzkrieg' or 'Aryan Invasion theory' is fictitious. It never happened. ~ When the British archaeologist (Wheeler) discovered a dozen skeletons, he propounded a theory about the final massacre by 'marauding invaders' that put an end to the Indus civilization. When an Indian scholar told him of Hariyuppa (or "Hariyupiyah") being mentioned in the Rig Veda, he took it to mean Harappa. ~ And since a fort was known as pur, and Indra (possibly a 'title' for the king/ruler/chief of the ancient 'Deva' people) was known as Purandhara or destroyer of forts, it all fitted neatly. After all, weren't the Indus cities among the most fortified? ~ Archaeologists are known to stumble, but the kind of knocking that the 'Aryan Invasion theory' has taken has few parallels. There are still many misconceptions about this culture that has resulted from the theoretical and cultural biases of the earliest excavators. One other misconception is that the Indus urban society was the result of colonization from Mesopotamia to the west (in modern Iraq).| The ancient Indus people couldn't have copied their town-planning from Egypt and Mesopotamia because in those civilizations the roads meandered like village streets. Nor was the writing similar to Sumer's (Sumerian Civilization - ancient Iraq, etc) cuneiform or the Egyptian (ancientMiṣr) hieroglyphics. The ancient Indus people had their own distinctive style. The greatness of the Indus-Sarasvati Civilization (the Sindhu-Sarasvati Sabhyata or 'Aryavarsha') can be attributed to ancient Indian genius (~ and trade was the driving force/factor.)

The term Swastika has been derived from the Sanskrit word "Svastika", which means well-being: "SU" means "good" or "auspicious,""ASTI" means "to be," and "KA" as a suffix. The swastika literally means, "to be good". Alternatively: "swa" is "higher self" (Supersoul), "asti" meaning "being", and "ka" as a suffix, so the translation can be interpreted as: "being with higher self". Suasti thus means "well-being." The suffix -kaeither forms a diminutive or intensifies the verbal meaning, and suastikamight thus be translated literally as "that which is associated with well-being," corresponding to "lucky charm" or "thing that is auspicious."Thus swastika means any lucky or auspicious object, and in particular a mark made on persons and things to denote auspiciousness, good luck or well-being. |Probably the most common design on the Indus seals is the swastika. The Swastika represents the cosmic spinning vortex. ~ In Sanaatan Dharma, the swastikarepresents the Universe in our own spiral galaxy in the forefinger of the Cosmic Entity. This carries most significance in establishing the creation of the Universe and the arms as 'kaalah' or time. | Theunion of Jiva-atma (the mere Self or individual soul) with the Param-atma (the Higher Self or Supersoul) is called Sanaatan Dharma; in other words: connecting (yog/sanjog) with the Higher Self ~ seeking communion (yog/sanjog) with the Universal Consciousness (Brahmn or Param-atma; Cosmic Light or Light Divine). This results in Self-realization ~ leading to the eternal bliss/spiritual ecstasy of self-realization: Sat-cit-ānanda. This 'way of life' is performative and (therefore) is to be experienced. Thus, the central concepts of dharma and karm-yog eludes translation.[~ The Cosmic Entity/Primordial Being - the highest authority of the universe - is the manifestation of the impersonal, unmanifested Brahmn (Universal Consciousness or Cosmic Light or Light Divine). Brahmn is OM or AUM. OM is also regarded as the Shabda Brahmn - pranavah/Omkara/pranava naad - the sound of the universe itself; *Bhairava = the Primordial Sound (vak or vani). [Here is Tagore's 'Arup tomar Bani': link. He has incorporated it into our national anthem too.] OM or AUM - is very auspicious; the Cosmic Entity is Omswaroop, manifestation of Brahmn - OM or AUM. [For purposes of comprehension: e.g. Sri Krishn is a manifestation/transcendental avatar of the Cosmic Entity; he also possesses all 16 qualities of a Purna Avatar - one in whom divinity is manifested fully; therefore, he is Omswaroop; the words emanating from his mouth is thus Bhairava/Primordial sound or pranava naad/pranavah/Omkara.] ~ Thus, Advaita (monism), Dvaita (dualism) and Astika (theism). Unlike the rigorous monism (Advaita) of the Upanishads, the Srimad Bhagavad-Gita also integrates dualism (Dvaita) and theism (āstika). | The Swastika is part of Buddhism and Jainism as well.] |Note: Bhairava/Primordial sound or pranava naad/pranavah/Omkara probably was also known as 'daiva vani'. While 'aakash vani' perhaps was related to celestial events and/or the constellation Orion. BG 10.35: || māsānāḿ mārga-śīrṣo 'ham || ~ "Of months I am Mārgaśīrṣa" [November-December] |Mrigashīrsha: Sanskrit mṛgaśiras (also spelled Mārgaśīrṣa/Mṛgaśira) - the 5th nakṣatra or lunar mansion - as used in Vedic astronomy and astrology, is the constellation Orion (also known as Kaalpurush, meaning: Timeless, Eternal or Ancient; kaal or kaalah = time). The Rig Veda refers to the Orion Constellation as Mriga/Mṛga (The Deer). ~ The term Mṛgaśira is a composite of two Sanskrit words, mṛgameaning animal (can also mean: deer) and śira meaning head or precisely, the top of the head. [~ The Indus 'Pasupati Seal' probably has something to do with this. | Our ancients seem to have been very familiar with the workings of the universe/cosmos.]

*BG 10.35: || māsānāḿ mārga-śīrṣo 'ham || ~ "Of months I am Mārgaśīrṣa" [November-December] ~ Kālabhairava Aṣṭamī (or Kalabhairava Jayanti) falls on Kṛṣṇa Pakṣa Aṣṭamī of the month of Mārgaśīrṣa (also spelled Mṛgaśira/Mrigashīrsha ~ November-December). On this day it is said that Lord Rudra-Śiva appeared on earth in the manifestation (avatāra) as Śrī Kālabhairava. | Kāla or kaalah = time; Bhairava = the Primordial Sound, the Shabda Brahmn- pranavah/Omkara/pranava naad, the sound of the universe itself; OM or AUM - is very auspicious. The impersonal, unmanifested Brahmn is Cosmic Light or Light Divine (divine effulgence). The Cosmic Entity/Primordial Being is Omswaroop - manifestation of OM or AUM. (Refer the note on Rudra-Siva.)

The right-facing swastika (Sanskrit: Svastika) in the decorative form is used to evoke sacred force. ~ Shri Ganesh has the Swastika on his palm. The swastika is at times considered a symbolic representation of Shri Ganesh (Vignesh or Vighna-Vinashak - the remover of obstacles) and is hence offered first offerings in every puja. The swastika is made with red vermilion (prepared with natural ingredients) during rituals. |Shri Ganesh - represents a set of qualities: great retention power or vast intelligence (as symbolized by the elephant head - implying elephant's memory). The elephant-head: represents calm disposition, intelligence, perceptiveness, knowledge and wisdom. [The light of wisdom = Surya-Kotti Samaprabha; as radiant as a million Suns.] The big head = think big. The small eyes = concentration. The small mouth and the bent trunk (Vakra-Tunndda) = less noise, more efficiency (complete opposite of 'empty vessels makes the most noise'). The bent trunk indicates: one who is not given to boasting or talking unnecessarily; in other words: non-ignorant. The big elephant ears = great listening ability ('listening', and not merely 'hearing'). The single tusk = retaining the good and discarding the rest. Also: non-extravagant. The big body (Maha-Kaaya) = immense strength: to stop all obstacles - in the path of good deeds or actions. The large stomach = not constricted; digests or accepts everything (all that life has to offer) without being affected. The swift mooshika-vahana(the 'mooshika' or the mouse as 'vehicle') - represents: swiftness(obviously), but a mooshika finds its way through all kinds of terrains and tears down all sorts of obstacles (vighn) - with its sharp teeth. And since the mooshika is his 'vaahan' or vehicle - the latter remains under control and cannot take Shri Ganesh for a ride. In other words: lack of negative greed or avoidable desire. The parasu or axe = to strike down all obstacles in the path of good/positive/constructive deeds. The rope + lotus = to pull you closer to the goal + to pull you away from negative aspects, negative thinking, etc. [A lotus: grows in muddy water yet remains untouched by it (refer the relevant passages.)] The palm in abhaya mudra = blessings + reassurance. The tasty Modakas = the rewards/fruition of one's single-minded efforts [karm-yog.] All that Shri Ganesh symbolizes can achieve any goal or purpose: Nirvighnam Kuru Me Deva Sarva-Kaaryessu Sarvadaa. [~ When one prays to Shri Ganesh, one is essentially praying to be bestowed with all these traits or qualities so as to be able to surmount all odds and impediments and complete a good deed or task successfully - always (Sarvadaa). Hence, Shri Ganesh is worshiped before the commencement of any auspicious task. | Gan + esh = Ganesh. 'Gan' can indicate people (gana) or even good traits (guna). 'Esh' = the best of or the master of. |Note: Lord Buddha is depicted with large ears, while the similarity between Sri Ganesh and the Laughing Buddha is remarkable. Devi Sarasvati is also a prominent figure in Buddhist iconography.]

~ And, all this should help us understand who the Sri Ganesh who assisted Maharshi Vedavyasa to compile the 'Mahabharata' (originally titled: 'Jaya' - Victory) was. Sri Ganesh and Devi Sarasvati are non-different. [Vignesh or Vighna-Vinashak (the remover of obstacles) and Varadey Kaamarupinee (the fulfiller of wishes, Destiny or 'Lady Luck') are non-different.]Sri Ganesh is not a physical 'son' of Goddess Parvati. 'Gauri-tanaya' can also mean manifestation, personification or embodiment. Goddess Parvati and Goddess Sarasvati (the river goddess) are transcendental avatars of Goddess Adi Shakti - the Cosmic Entity. [Goddess Parvati's daughter is also named Sarasvati - but she is a namesake.] |Goddess Parvati (Devi Durga) and Goddess Sarasvati (the river goddess) are non-different. Here is the Sharada Maa Bhajan in Raag Bhairavi: link There is an Indus seal depicting the "Ashta-Matrika" or Ashta-Matara - Eight female Divinities. This seal depicts a goddess (standing in the arch of a peepal tree), wearing a headdress of bullhorns, with bangles on both arms; a devotee is kneeling before her. An animal, most likely a large ram, is facing her. Seven figures, wearing long dresses and bangles on their arms, are moving in a procession before her. ~ Very likely, the seven figures represent the "Sapta Matrikas" or the seven female Divinities. The central female figure is Devi Parvati (popularly known as Goddess Durga) ~ Together, they constitute the "Asta Matrikas" or the eight female Divinities. Some Indus glyphs are also seen. | Goddess Adi Shakti possesses the power of the cosmic phenomenon of Creation, and hence She is Brahma - the Creator. (Refer the Devi Mahatmyam stotra-s.) The River SarasvatI can (thus) also be referred to as Brahm-putri. [Brhm = wisdom, enlightenment; eternal knowledge - para vidya. Here, putri = manifestation, personification or embodiment.] Hence, Goddess SarasvatI - the river goddess - is also known as Brahmi or Brahmani ~ manifestation of Brhm. She is wisdom personified - the symbol of true/eternal/timeless knowledge - para vidya. ~ Devi Sarasvati represents intelligence, wisdom, consciousness, cosmic knowledge, creativity, education, culture, enlightenment, music, the arts, eloquence (persuasion/ vāk) and so on. The goddess of knowledge and arts represents the free flow of wisdom and consciousness. [Wisdom or enlightenment has no form by itself.] Sri Hayagriva [Haya = horse, griva = jaw] is the male equivalent of Devi Sarasvati... and may be considered as Brahm-putra. [Goddess Sarasvati is a prominent figure in Buddhist iconography. She is also worshipped in Bali and Japan.]

..........................................................

~ The SarasvatI River is an important river goddess in the Rig Ved ~ whose banks served as fertile soil for the growth of ancient Vedic culture. In the Rig Veda, the SarasvatI is described with all the grandeur of a mighty and a very large river. ~ She is called 'the best of the rivers' (naditama). It seems to have been a great river with perennial water. Along the banks of the Sarasvati and the adjoining river basins lived our enlightened ancestors who developed a unique world-view blending material prosperity with spirituality and a scientific temper (knowledge, innovation and creativity). Spiritualism (not to be misconstrued for ritualism or religiofication) and contentment constituted the core of the accepted value system. The famous Pancha-janah (the five peoples), namely, the Purus, Anus, Druhyus, Yadus and Tursvasas (descendents of Raja Yayati) lived in the Sarasvati Valley before moving onto different places in various directions. ~ Yayati hailed from a Chandravanshi (lunar lineage/clan) i.e. moon-flag-bearing clan. |In the Rig Veda, the Anus are repeatedly identified with the ParuSNI river (Ravi), the central river of the Punjab, and the Purus (also known as the "Bharatas") are identified with the SarasvatI. | Raja Yayati, as we know, did away with primogeniture to crown his youngest-born, Puru, as the heir to his "existing" kingdom ~ i.e. the areas he ruled before he underwent stem-cell therapy. Thus, Puru ruled his kingdom in the Gangetic plain. BG 10.31: || srotasām asmi jāhnavī || ~ "and of flowing waters I am the Ganga." [Here, 'Ganga' is a reference to India.] ~ While, the other sons of Yayati - Yadu, Turvasu, Anu and Druhyu - subsequently settled in the "newer" areas (~ the ones Raja Yayati brought under his rule - during his "borrowed youth" ~ i.e. after his stem cell therapy.) ~ Puru, thus became the progenitor of the "Puruvansh" (also known as the "Bharatvansh"); and so his heirs came to be known as the "Bharatas". ~ The Pandavas and the Kauravas were Purus (or Bharatas). King Porus (Puru/Paurava/Parvateshvar) too hailed from the Puruvansh (Pauravas). ~ The all-conquering Alexander's career pretty much came to a halt... after his brief encounter with this mighty king of the Indus region. Krishn, on the other hand, was a Chandravanshi (lunar lineage/clan) - moon-flag-bearing Yadu: more precisely a Shurasena Yadu (Megasthenes'Sourasenoi) ~ a branch of the Yadu clan/kula. Therefore, the Shuracena Yadus can be identified with the ancient clan/lineage of Harikula or Harivansh. The Sarakenoi or Saraceni (late Latin Saracēnus or late Greek Sarakēnos) could actually be the Shuracena Yadus, apart from the Vrishnis, that is. (Vasudev Krishn, the Lord of Mathura and Dvarka, is also known as Varshneya). |The Persians, on the other hand, can be fully identifiable with the Anus - descendents of Yayati's son, Anu, the particular Dasas (non-Purus) of the Rig Veda. A major Persian clan which is not named in the Rig Veda, but appears as a prominent Anu clan/kula in the Puranas and the epics is the Madrakas (also known as: Madras or Medes or Madai). [Madri hailed from this clan.] ~ The name Anu or Anava for the Persians appears to have survived even in later times: the country and the people in the very heart of Avestan land, to the immediate north of the Hamun-i Hilmand, were known, as late as Greek times, as the Anauon or Anauoi. | Yayati made Turvasu the ruler of the far western regions. The descendants of Turvasu were known as Turvasus, who founded Turvaski. Even the Tusharas (Tukharas, Tócharoi) are believed to be descendents of Turvasu. The Tushara country mentioned in the Mahabharata could be Turkmenistan, now a Central Asian Republic and/or the Turkistan of Afghanistan. | As for Druhyu, he and his descendents (the Druhyus) very likely settled in the areas that came under ancient Uruk (modern Iraq)... and perhaps had something to do with the Sumerian Civilization. [Devayani was the ancestress of the Yadus and Turvasus, while Sharmishtha was the ancestress of the Purus, Anus and Druhyus.] |The seven greatest capital cities of the Rama Empire/civilization were known in classical texts as The Seven Rishi Cities. Rishi (Sanskrit: ṛṣI) signifies enlightenment, wisdom and knowledge. ... So, were these Seven Rishi Cities knowledge hubs or thinking hub? Priest-Kings ("Great Teachers" or "Masters") who governed the cities were essentially Brahmana statesmen. [Brahmana implies erudition; can also be interpreted as enlightened persons with a broader view or outlook. Some of them belonged to the benevolent aristocracy of the Rama civilization. Today they are generally called "Priest-Kings". They were apparently men whose mental powers/intellect were of a degree that would seem incredible to most moderns. (Even Chanakya can be called a Brahmana statesman.)] |Ayodhya = unconquerable or eternal. "Ayodhya" comes from the root word "yudh" meaning "not to be fought". Ikshvaku or Ikhaku or Ikkhaku; Skt. Ifahvaku; Pali: OjcTcaka, Okkaka. |Ikshvaku (son of Vaivasvata Manu - the 7th and current Manu) is the founder/progenitor of the Ikshvaku (or Aikṣvāka) lineage - to which greats like Mandhata, Dilīpa, Bhagiratha, Raghu and Shri Ram belonged. The Rama Empire or the Ikshvaku dynasty/empire encompassed wide swathes of land, culture and 'way of life'. [Akkadian may be a variant of Ikshvaku.] ~ And, from what we can gather, the Maurya clan is believed to have been an offshoot of the Shakya clan - to which Shri Gautam Buddh belonged. The Shakya clan is in turn believed to be a tributary of the Ikshvaku clan - to which Shri Ram belonged. The Ikshvaku clan is also known as the Raghuvanshi lineage/Raghuvansh or Raghukula - after one of Shri Ram's illustrious ancestors, Raghu. The fabled Buddhist land or mythical kingdom of Shambhala is believed to have been the ashram/abode of Vamana ~ the seventh and current "Manu" - Vaivasvata Manu (also known as Surya and the father of Ikshvaku - the progenitor of the Ikshvaku lineage). ~ Born to Saranya and Vivasvat, his original name is Satyavrata. He saved humanity from the (previous) great flood/deluge (Mahajal Pralay) - by building specially-designed ships (nao) - as per the advise of the Matsya-Avatar. Noukeshwar is at best a title and means - Principal/Chief/Captain of the nao. (Here 'nao' or 'boat' indicates specially-designed-and-equipped-ship.) ~ Whether 'Noukeshwar' has been abbreviated/altered to 'Noah' (due to the passage of time + change in phonetics), and/orwhether Satyavrat aka Vaivasvata Manu is also referred to as "Noah" or not ~ my guess is as good as yours. |The 'Harappan' or 'Indus-Sarasvati' civilization is a phase (marked by the rise, intensification, diversification and subsequent evolution of an urban process) within the much earlier, more extensive and more durable Vedic Civilization that still continues. The material and spiritual benefits the river SarasvatI brought to the people is immense. In the Rig Vedic times, it was a mighty river flowing from the mountains to the sea (giribhyah asamudrat). The abundance and tremendous force of its water had an enchanting impact on the minds of the poets who repeatedly described it as: 'abounding in waters' - maho-arnah;'flowing rapidly' - pra-sasre;'moving fautlessly' - akuvari;'possessing unlimited strength' - yasyah amah ananto;'roaring' - charati roruvat,and'fierce' - ghora.Thus, the realistic picture in the Rig Veda is that of a mighty and highly glorified river named SarasvatI descending from the Himalayas. ~ The river disappeared at a place called Vinasana (literally 'disappearance'), though many believe it still flows below the ground.[Here is Tagore's 'Ogo Nadi Apon Bege':link.]

The River SarasvatI is described as 'the purest of all rivers' (nadinam suchiryati) and'auspicious'. ~ Nahushas, descendents of Nahusha, on whom the Sarasvati had poured her grace and blessings. [Yayati was son of king Nahusha.] Pancha-janah (the five peoples), that is, Anus, Druhyus, Yadus, Turvasas and Purus, whose welfare the Sarasvati had increased. (refer previous paragraph.) ~ The material and spiritual benefits the River SarasvatI brought to the people is reflected in several epithets attributed to her, for example: 'rich in grains' (Vajinivati);'strong in wealth and power' (vajeshu vajini) and'promoter of the welfare of the five peoples' (panchajata vardhayanti). | While Panis, the 'churlish - thinking only of themselves' whom the Sarasvati consumed; Paravatas, who were destroyed by the Sarasvati, and Brisyas, whom the Sarasvati rooted out. | The Indus Unicorn Seals depict a one-horned horse. [One-horned = ekashringa. Even Sri Ganesh is depicted with a single tusk.] It is imagery - to denote rarity or uniqueness. The Cosmic Entity is vishama (unequaled); atulah (incomparable); ekah (the one); naikah (the many); ekaatmaa (the one self); asankhyeyah (with countless names and forms); shoorah-veerah (the valiant); vikramee (the most daring); saattvikah (one who is full of saatvic or noble traits and qualities); kartaa (the doer); maargah (the path); neyah (the guide); keshavah (one whose rays illumine the cosmos, and one who is the three: kah Brahma, ah Vishnu and IsaShiva-Rudra); vishvam (one who is the universe); Vishvaroopa (one whose body/form is the Universe - the Universal Form - the Viraat-roop); Vishvaatma (Soul of the Universe - guiding spirit); vanamaalee (one who wears a garland of forest flowers); sragvee (one who always wears a garland of undecaying flowers) and Mayur (the Lord Who Has A Peacock Feathered-Crest). All of which is applicable to Krishn as well. [The Cosmic Entity/Primordial Being is also: aadidevah (the first devah); mahaadevah (the great devah); deveshah (the Lord of all devas) and adhaataa (above whom there is no other).] ~ However, a closer look at the unicorn seals reveals a body reminiscent of a horse as well as that of a cow. So, the unicorn could be denoting Devi Sarasvati too - Varadey Kaamarupinee or kamadhenu (the fulfiller of wishes, Destiny or 'Lady Luck'). ~ Rivers and cows are often poetically correlated in the Rig Veda. BG 10.28: || dhenūnām asmi kāmadhuk || ~ "among cows I am the surabhi" (also known as kamadhenu - the "wish-fulfilling cow" ~ possibly a metaphor for prosperity, luck, etc.) |The Indus seal depicting a three-headed composite animal figure is the seal of Vasudev Krishn - the Lord of Dvarka. The three-heads are: bull (Vrishabha), unicorn (ekashringa horse) and antelope (mṛga). The symbolism associated with the unicorn: rarity and uniqueness; bull: in Sanaatan Dharmic thought, dharma/justice is denoted by the bull (Vṛṣabha). Vrisha Uttamam means Supreme Judge; Vrishaakritih = dharma personified. Antelope: deer. Mrigashīrsha: Sanskrit mṛgaśiras (also spelled Mārgaśīrṣa/Mṛgaśira): the 5th nakṣatra or lunar mansion - as used in Vedic astronomy and astrology, is the constellation Orion (also known as Kaalpurush, meaning: Timeless, Eternal or Ancient). The Rig Veda refers to the Orion Constellation as Mriga (The Deer). | The Indus glyphs also indicate matsya and kurma, besides other symbols such as: peepal tree, peepal leaves, crocodile, parasu, chakra, peacock, eagle, conch-shell, arrow and Swastika.

The Indus (River Sindhu), on the other hand, issues from a lion's mouth. Hence this river is called Sinh ka bab ~ the lion's gate or mouth. ~ The once-mighty River Indus, it is said, originates from the mouth of a lion (Senge Khabab or "Lion's Mouth")- a perennial spring - in Tibet. (Possibly a mountain snout shaped like a lion's mouth.) Thus, it is also called Sengge Tsangpo or 'Lion River'. This river is a common lifeline, and symbolically binds the people of more than one nation. Few rivers in the world flow through as stunning a landscape as the Sindhu (River Indus). It flows through plains, villages, hamlets and towns, as well as by valleys, gorges and peaks of countless hues. [Sindhu is Sanskrit for the River Indus. "Sindhu" means river,stream or ocean in Sanskrit.] BG 10.24: || sarasam asmi sagarah || ~ "and of bodies of water I am the ocean." ~ "Hindu" is simply the variant of Sindhu (~ the mighty River Indus, perhaps the largest of all rivers in the world after the Nile - Sanskrit: Nilah or Neel.)  

Note:Tibet is 'Tripishtaka' or 'Trivistaka' in Sanskrit, meaning: the land of the Devas (an ancient clan or people) to the north of the Himalayas. ~ So, was Tibet (Tripishtaka or 'Trivistaka) part of the ancient Himalayan kingdom ~ ruled over by Goddess Parvati's father, Himavat (also known as Himavant - the ruler of the Himalaya kingdom of ancient India and the personification of the Himalayan mountains)? ... And this perhaps explains why Goddess Parvati is also known as 'Himalaya-putri'. [Putri = daughter. Can also be interpreted as personification, manifestation or embodiment.] BG 10.25: || sthāvarāṇāḿ himālayaḥ || ~ "and of immovable things I am the Himalayas."| The image of India is in the image of Goddess Parvati (popularly known as Goddess Durga.) She is Rudra-Siva. BG 10.23: || rudranam sankaras casmi || ~ "Of all the Rudras I am Sankara" [Rudra-Śiva] ~ There are eleven Rudras, of whom Rudra-Siva, is preeminent ~ Goddess Parvati/Durga Herself.Rudra-Siva is also an honorific - for the manifestations or transcendental avatars of the Cosmic Entity (Goddess Adi Shakti) - due to their karm and contribution. Goddess Adi Shakti is also Rudra-Siva - since she possess the power of the cosmic phenomenon of dissolution; therefore, She is Nataraj.|The jata (dredlocks) represent the Sivaliks - part of the Himalayan ranges. BG 10.25: || sthāvarāṇāḿ himālayaḥ || ~ "and of immovable things I am the Himalayas." The gushing Ganga emerges from these mountains through the snout known as Gomukh. BG 10.31: || srotasām asmi jāhnavī || ~ "and of flowing waters I am the Ganga."The tiger-skin represents her valiant nature; it could also be an allegory for the River Indus. (refer the previous paragraph.) The smurf-blue colour - refer 'Meghavarnam'. Trishul could be a reference to a group of three Himalayan mountain peaks. Or it could be an allegory for the three rivers: Ganga, Yamuna and the mythic Sarasvati. Or both. [The confluence of the Ganga, Yamuna and the Sarasvati is known as Triveni Sangam or Prayag. Triveni and Trishul; tri = three.] The crescent moon represents lunar mansion. For the crescent moon affixed to the jata of Rudra-Siva - we have to consider BG 10.35: || māsānāḿ mārga-śīrṣo 'ham|| ~ "Of months I am Mārgaśīrṣa [November-December]". ~Kālabhairava Aṣṭamī (or Kalabhairava Jayanti) falls on Kṛṣṇa Pakṣa Aṣṭamī of the month of Mārgaśīrṣa (also spelled Mṛgaśira/Mrigashīrsha ~ November-December).On this day it is said that Lord Rudra-Śiva appeared on earth in the manifestation (avatāra) as Śrī Kālabhairava.|Sri = respectful honorific. Kāla or kaalah = time; Bhairava = the Primordial Sound, the Shabda Brahmn- pranavah/Omkara/pranava naad, the sound of the universe itself; OM or AUM - is very auspicious. The Cosmic Entity/Primordial Being is Omswaroop - manifestation of OM or AUM. (Also refer the note on Rudra-Siva.)|Mrigashīrsha: Sanskrit mṛgaśiras (also spelled Mārgaśīrṣa/Mṛgaśira): the 5th nakṣatra or lunar mansion - as used in Vedic astronomy and astrology, is the constellation Orion (also known as Kaalpurush, meaning: Timeless, Eternal or Ancient). ~ The first two carana/pada(quarters) of this nakṣatra are part of Vṛṣabha Rāśi or Taurus (bull). [In Sanaatan Dharmic thought, dharma/justice is denoted by the bull (Vṛṣabha). Vrisha Uttamam means Supreme Judge. The two Indus Yogi Seals - depicting two figures seated in a yogic posture and wearing a headdress of bull-horn, represent Vrisha Uttamam - the Supreme Judge.] The latter half of this star belongs to Mithuna Rāśi (Gemini). | Gemini - the twins, but that is not literal. ~ This should also help us understand what the syncretic form of Rudra-Siva and Shakti is all about. Rudra-Siva and Shakti are non-different. | Nestled amidst the Himalayas are the Kalasha or Kalash people. ... And though they are thought to be descendents of Alexander’s army ~ due to their distinct appearance, customs, language and 'way of life', yet, even a cursory study of their culture indicates otherwise. [No wonder Goddess Parvati/Durga is referred to as 'Gauri' - the radiant one.] | The Kalasha are agro-pastoral people who live in tune with nature, surrounded by lush green fields and natural springs. Their houses are constructed on solid stone foundation, but the walls are made of wooden planks - fashioned out of the Deodar tree. [Deodar is anglicized. In Sanskrit, it is known as devadāru, which means "wood of the devas", a compound of deva (very likely, the ancient Deva people) and dāru (wood, etym. tree).] ~ They adhere to a tradition based on ancestor worship, and believe in a single, creator God, though different Kalasha places of worship are incorrectly understood to be places of worship for separate and distinct Kalasha deities. The Kalash do not have any routine daily prayers. They pray whenever they initiate any activities like harvesting, ploughing and construction + whenever the favour and honour of that single, creative God is needed. Most prayers are offered during Kalasha festivities. [Indrain is probably an altar dedicated to and/or named after Indra - a 'title' for the Ruler/King/Chief of the ancient Deva people. Maybe the 'Indra' was a chieftain under Himavat/Himavant - the ruler of the Himalaya kingdom of ancient India.] ~ The Kalash people worship 'Mahandeo' ~ possibly a variant of 'Mahadev'. [Mahadev is a reference to Rudra-Siva ~ which would mean Goddess Parvati herself. ~ She is Kailashpati (Ruler/Chief of Kailash) as well as Shambhu Nath - the Ruler (Nath) and Guardian of Shambhala ~ also considered to be the real Haridvar, the actual Manas Sarovara, Prayag, Kailash and Rishikesh or 'Agni Tirtha'. It is a land of immortals. But Kailashpati could also mean: Chief of the Kalasha people ~ part of the ancient Deva clan/people. | The ancient Himalayan kingdom probably consisted of wide swathes of land - along the entire stretch of the Himalayan ranges; and so, Goddess Parvati/Durga and her many forms, like Vaishno Devi, Devi Katyayani, Devi Varahi, Devi Narasimhi, Devi Chamunda, Devi Brahmi or Brahmani (goddess Sarasvati) et al is worshipped. ~ Maybe, the eastern regions of modern India too were part of the ancient Himalayan kingdom, and so, Devi Durga is widely worshipped and even considered as a daughter in these parts. Durga Puja is treated as the Goddess' homecoming. Even Himachal Pradesh is 'Devabhoomi' - abode of the Deva people.] | The Kalasha myths and beliefs centre on the relationship between the human soul and the universe. This relationship, according to Kalash mythology, manifests itself in music and dance. In their festivals, music and dance are performed not only for entertainment, but also as a ritual. The Kalash celebrate four major festivals commemorating seasonal change and significant events in agro-pastoral life. These festivals are 'Joshi' or 'Chilimjusht', 'Uchal', 'Phoo' ('Pul' festival - pũ. from pūrṇa, purnima - full moon - in Sept.) and 'Chowmos'. They celebrate these festivals by cooking traditional meals and dancing to traditional music during the week-long events. The festival of 'Joshi'is for spring harvest, and lasts 4-6 days in mid-May and the 'Uchao' festival in August celebrates the pre-harvest with cheese, corn and wine. The 'Choimus' in mid-December for the winter solstice is the most impressive, lasting 10 days. The most important Kalash festival is the Chowmos/Choimus/Chawmos (cawmōs, ghona chawmos yat, Khowar "chitrimas" from *cāturmāsya), which is celebrated for two weeks during winter solstice (c. Dec. 7-22), at the beginning of the month chawmos mastruk. It marks the end of the year's fieldwork and harvest. It involves much music, dancing and feasting. [And, aren't were familiar with the concept of Chaturmaas? Or even Chaitra - associated with the coming of Spring, since Holi, the spring festival of colour, is celebrated on the eve of Chaitra (namely, the last day of Phalgun month)? BG 10.35: || māsānāḿ mārga-śīrṣo 'ham ṛtūnāḿ kusumākaraḥ || ~ "Of months I am Mārgaśīrṣa [November-December], and of seasons I am spring".] Durga Puja is also held in the spring season, it is known as Basanti Puja. Basanti comes from Basanta or Spring. It is believed that Shri Ram invoked the goddess in the month of Ashvina (Ashvin/Asvayuja/Autumn) before his battle with Ravana to seek her blessings; it was an untimely invocation - akal bodhan. Since it is held in the month of autumn, this puja is known as Sharadutsab or Sharadiya Puja - autumnal worship. | The Kalash believe that a new sun is born on December 21 (winter solstice) and that the new sun affects the flora and fauna of the land. [~ We celebrate Makara Sankranti or Pongal; but many people conflate Makara Sankranti (Uttarayan) with the Winter Solstice (which falls on December 21/22). BG 10.31: || jhaṣāṇāḿ makaraś cāsmi || ~ "I am the crocodile among the fishes" ~ is a reference to Makara Sankranti. A crocodile can be associated with patience and precision, but the crocodile allegory can also be indicative of a chieftain.] The Kalasha way of life is finely balanced, allowing both men and women to do their duties freely. The Kalasha society is not a male-dominated one, their social organization is very effective, and ensures there is no cruelty or discrimination based on issues of gender. The Kalash society is optimistic. Crows represent the ancestors, and are frequently fed. The rituals is basically, though not always, temple-less, involving fire, sacred wood, three circumambulations, and the *hotṛ (indicating fire-ritual). | Thus, despite the passage of time, we can clearly find traces of their ancient and original way of life. ... And it isn't much different from what we do. So much for myths involving Alexander.

Bharatavarsha means: the continent (Sanskrit: continent = 'varsha') that is dedicated (Sanskrit: dedicated = 'rata') to light, wisdom (Sanskrit: wisdom = 'bha'). ~ Bharatavarsha or Bharatadesam also means, "cherished land". (However, it is unlikely that the contours of modern India constituted ancient Bharatvarsha.) ~ Yet another name for ancient India is  Jambudveepa or Jambadveepa. [Jambu or Jamba = Indian blackberry.] So, maybe, there was an abundance of this tree (obviously a much different version of what we find now) ~ and hence the name. Thus, Jambudveepa = island of the Jambu or Jambul (Indian blackberry) trees. Or perhaps, ancient India was shaped like an Indian blackberry. ~ Now whether the contours of modern India constituted ancient Jambudveepa or not - my guess is as good as yours.

Devi Sarasvati represent the divine forces in play in the growth, expansion and evolution of the Universe. This aspect of the growth of the Universe is thus steeped with the knowledge of all that has transpired since the moment of Creation and continues to drive the further evolution of the Universe. This driving force of knowledge is called as the divinity Sarasvati as it is a knowledge that continues to flow through the expanse of the cosmos gracefully and incessantly like waves. [Saras means gracefully flowing.] This knowledge power forms the root for all forms of knowledge, speech, skill, arts, fine arts, craft etc. Sarasvati is therefore the divinity that promotes the development of all of these capabilities in mankind, society and civilization. 

Devi Sarasvati represents intelligence, wisdom, consciousness, cosmic knowledge, creativity, education (not limited to text-bookish knowledge), culture, enlightenment, music, the arts, eloquence (persuasion/ vāk) and so on. The goddess of knowledge and arts represents the free flow of wisdom and consciousness. Goddess Sarasvati is intrinsically associated with flowing water in her role as a goddess of knowledge (not transient/apara vidya though; hence she holds a lotus - the symbol of true/eternal/timeless knowledge - para vidya). She is wisdom personified. ~ In the Rig Ved, Sarasvati is a river as well as its personification as a goddess. | Veda = The Book of Knowledge/The Book of Enlightenment. Veda (meaning wisdom, knowledge) comes from the root "vid" - to know. Veda has in turn given rise to "Vidya", which also means: knowledge. | The wisdom of the Panchatantra, Hitopadesha, Jataka tales and Jain tales are universal and timeless, hence they too can be called para vidya - non-transient. 

Knowledge or education does not have a narrow or linear definition. It is not confined to mechanical thinking or regurgitation; it is not bookish or armchair theories (transient or apara vidya) either. It involves intellectual pursuits and intellectual curiosity (as opposed to rote-learning). Knowledge is likely to be wasted if it exists in a wisdom vacuum/void. BG 10.22: || indriyanam manas casmi bhutanam asmi cetana || ~ "Of the senses (indriyanam) I am the mind (manas); and in living beings (bhutanam) I am the living force" ~ (cetana, consciousness; consciousness and conscience are two different things;consciousness[cetana]is awareness, sentience - the ability to feel, think, perceive,comprehend or to experience. It is necessary for cognition/perception. If the mind/intellect is dulled, there is a cascading effect - the consciousness (ability to think, perceive, comprehend etc too gets dulled. ~ This can be applicable to a civilization too.) | Creativity and innovation is also part of knowledge and education, and these are not confined to textbooks alone; knowledge can also be passed on from one generation to the next - minus formal schools or text-books - one can even learn via osmosis; therefore, e.g. an agriculturist or a horticulturist or someone who is involved in animal husbandry, or even a sculptor, an artisan or craftsman is not devoid of knowledge or education. Even people with automobile and electrical or electronics engineering degrees depend on technicians, mechanics (mistri) and handymen. In earlier times, kusalavyas (wandering poets) too were greatly respected - since they disseminated stories from our ancient heritage and history through songs, couplets and the like. There was dignity of labour and skill; e.g. we marvel at the town-planning feats of the ancient Indus engineers, however, there would also have been a multitude of labourers to accomplish or give shape to this feat. [The Indian Civilization (Indus-Sarasvati Civilization or 'Aryavarsha') was a knowledge-based culture/civilization that was also attuned to economic activity. ~ So (probably) skill-building/development, vocational training, etc too received due attention, alongside what we now understand as primary education.] ~ True knowledge (para vidya), education and wisdom is also the ability to eschew perfunctoryness, finger-pointing, mechanical thinking, and the like and to do non-linear thinking; to have a broader vision, to take a wholesome view of issues and to emerge with holistic solutions. [Something that both Krishn and Chanakya possessed. ~ Krishn vs the Kauravas + Krishn vs Jarasandh and allies (anti-Krishn) were key turning points, they put things on the road to recovery. Similarly, Chanakya vs Dhana Nanda breathed new life and energy into ancient India. ~ The matsya (the fish) - swims against the tide/flow despite all odds (and blazes a trail for others to follow), matsya is Neelkanth (soaking up bile and negativism, thereby making the journey - since there are no instant solutions - easier for others; it is work-in-progress, and if it also involves perception and mindset changing it takes time), matsya never rises to the bait. The swan (hamsah) is not ignorant; the swan possess the ability to separate the water from the cream (in milk) - symbolizing the need to differentiate between the positive and the negative, between the enduring and the transient (trivia); the swan thus is able to see and comprehend the larger picture/canvas/vision and prioritize accordingly. 'Coz putting the cart before the horse doesn't help.] | There is no indication (in our ancient texts) that our ancients arrived at uniform solutions based on abstract figures and statistics. [It is more likely that they were unaware of what statistical figures meant. Parameters and yardsticks (and perhaps even terminology and nomenclature) that is applicable to other civilizations or newer cultures or relatively homogeneous cultures or small/smaller nations or even larger nations with smaller populations, may not work w.r.t India - a nation where high-end phones, IT/BT, plasma television sets, space research and allopathy coexist with radio, type-writer, bullock-carts, village fairs/melas and ayurveda/homeopathy; a nation whose geography incorporates deserts, mountains, valleys, plains and what-not.] | Tagore's vision was to take on a more holistic attitude towards understanding the dynamic spirit of his time (and beyond). ~ He also felt that the West should be capable of "imparting to the East what is best in herself, and of accepting in a right spirit the wisdom that the East has stored for centuries."] ~ India has never been a monolith with a homogeneous culture and peoples; India has always been a kaleidoscope with complex population demographics, mindset, worldview and unique regional dynamics. [Tagore envisioned a parallelism - the parallelism of welding together into one body various peoples (~ and thisis reminiscent of the Universal Form of the Primordial.)] Therefore, what could be applicable to some parts/regions may not work or be applicable to others. Besides, each region have had their own history and geographical and evolutionary aspects... and therefore, disparate dynamics. [Even in modern India, arid and difficult landscape have fueled mercantile energy; mountainous regions have given a hardy people; a mixed landscape have nourished agro-based functions and artisanship, while lush-greenery have nurtured literature, art, creativity, innovation and other intellectual pursuits (besides agro-based activities and artisanship).] | Ancient India was also the seat of learning - due to research and innovation in multiple areas. And this attracted seekers of knowledge from far and wide. The decline of Takshashila marked the decline in Indian education, thought and structure. Fewer and fewer knowledge-seekers, students and travelers made the trip to India.|Tagore advised that it is important for a nation/people to develop herself from within, instead of merely adopting (relying upon) Western or borrowed methods; 'coz borrowing other people's history will not be enduring. ~ There is an anecdote involving Tenali Rama or Tenali Ramakrishna - the great wit. ~ Tenali Rama prayed to the Goddess. After a while She appeared before him - carrying a bowl of milk (representing wealth) and a bowl of curd (representing wisdom). She asked him to choose. Tenali Rama (very intelligently) mixed the contents of the two bowls and drank it. The goddess, impressed with him, blessed him with wealth and wisdom.

...........................................................

Megasthenes' Herakles was not the classical Greek deity per se. ~ During his travels (as the ambassador of the Seleucids) during the reign of Samraat Chandragupta Maurya of the Maurya Empire/Dynasty... Megasthenes came upon an Indian deity, a fascinating figure... and equated him with the classical Greek divinity - Herakles. This Herakles was none other than Krishn or Hari-Krishna. Megasthenes also described an Indian clan called Sourasenoi, who especially worshipped 'Herakles' in their land, and this land had two cities, Methora and Kleisobora, and a navigable river, the Jobares. ... As was common in the ancient period, the Greeks sometimes described foreign deities/gods in terms of their own divinities, and there is little doubt that the 'Sourasenoi' refers to the Shurasenas or Shurasena Yadus ~ a branch of the Yadu clan/kula. Therefore, the Shuracena Yadus can be identified with the ancient clan/lineage of Harikula or Harivansh. [The Sarakenoi or Saraceni (late Latin Saracēnus or late Greek Sarakēnos) could actually be the Shuracena Yadus, apart from the Vrishnis, that is. Vasudev Krishn, the Lord of Mathura and Dvarka, is also known as Varshneya.]|~ Quintus Curtius also mentions that when Alexander confronted King Porus (Puru or Raja Paurava/Parvateshvar)... Porus' soldiers were carrying an image of 'Herakles' in their vanguard. ~ The all-conquering Alexander's career pretty much came to a halt... after his brief encounter with this mighty king of the Indus region. [Sindhu is Sanskrit for the River Indus. "Sindhu" means river,stream or ocean in Sanskrit.] BG 10.24: || sarasam asmi sagarah || ~ "and of bodies of water I am the ocean."[The Greeks however had some success ruling as kings in north-western cities such as the one in Takshashila... the decline of which marked the decline in Indian education, thought and structure. However, the so-called Macedonian empire in the east lasted less than ten years after the invasion.]

"Persia" very likely evolved from "Parshva" (meaning: 'next door', 'neighbouring' or 'nearby'). The Rig Vedic Parsus or Parsavas has been anglicized to Persians. So, maybe, the ancient Indus people (refer relevant passages on the etymology of the word "Hindu") called the people of the first/neighbouring port by the Sanskrit word "Parshva". ~ Did the ancient Persians in turn (also) refer to the ancient Indus people and/or those living to the east of them as "Prachya" (meaning: 'Eastern' or Eastern Country) - the Greek Praesii or Prasioi? ~ my guess is as good as yours.

Krishn founded the city of Pataliputra - 138 generations before the reign of Samraat Chandragupta Maurya. (The despotic Nandas' reign ended ~ after Chanakya outmaneuvered Dhana Nanda and his allies.) |Now, was this Pataliputra (founded by Krishn) Palibothra or Palimbothra to the Greeks? That is: was this Pataliputra, Megasthenes'Palibothra? Was the Greek Praesii or Prasioi ~ "Prachya" or 'Eastern Country'? ... Praesii or Prasioi is said to have been very prosperous ~ the capital being Palibothra, a very large, industrious and wealthy city, after which the people themselves were known as Palibothri. Apparently, Palibothra was located (from the north-west) before the Ganges-Yamuna confluence. ... But modern Patna lies southeast of the confluence. ~ So, is this 'Ganga' a reference to the river or is it a metaphor? More likely the latter. Maybe it is a reference to ancient India. BG 10.31: || srotasām asmi jāhnavī || ~ "and of flowing waters I am the Ganga." || So, was Praesii (of the Greeks) actually Prachya, which in Sanskrit means 'Eastern country', the capital of which was the Pataliputra built by Krishn - 138 generations before Chandragupta Maurya? Was Praesii or Prasioi (of the Greeks) - East to the ancient Persians? ~ Therefore, were there two Magadh-s ~ which has resulted in much confusion? ~ Megasthenes'Palibothra (the Pataliputra built by Krishn) may not have been located in the eastern parts of modern India. Alexander did not cross the Indus region, and so, could not have gone all the way to the eastern parts of modern India to battle with Chandragupta Maurya. | So, what areas did Megasthenes refer to by the city of Palibothra, the country of Praesii and the river Erannoboas? ... Megasthenes was reasonably familiar with the places he visited in ancient India. Apparently, "The Indus skirts the frontiers of Praesii". ... But there is no River Indus in the eastern parts of modern India. ~ According to Classical accounts the river Jomanes flows through Palibothra into the Ganges between the towns of Methora (Mathura) and Carisobaras. ~ So, this Methora (Mathura) was very likely part of Prachya - Eastern Country (Praesii or Prasioi to the Greeks). But what is meant by Carisobaras? River Sarasvati? Or River Chandrabhaga (Chenab)? Here, Jomares (Yamuna) is very likely a metaphor. It could not have been the river by the same name ~ since the river Yamuna is part of the Madhyadesa or Middle Country region (of the Mahabharata times). | There is the country of Prabhadraka, Prabhadra or Palibhadra/Paribhadra, (part of Madhyadesa from the Mahabharata times). There is also reference to a king called Chandraketu (as the head of the Prabhadraka Kshatriyas). Was this Chandraketu the Sandrokottas of the Greek accounts? But Prachya - Eastern Country (Praesii or Prasioi to the Greeks) could not have been part of Madhyadesa (Middle Country). Also, who then was Sandrokyptos? Who was Sasicottus? And who was Xandramas? | Apparently, Magadha (the Prachya, "Easterners," Greek, Prasioi) had attained a dominating position. ... Therefore, it appears that there were two Magadha-s: One on the eastern parts of modern India (consisting of eastern U.P., Bihar, possibly Jharkhand, Bengal, Assam and Odisha) and the other on the western parts of ancient India. [~ Two countries bearing the same name was not unusual, though. There were two Kamboja-s (actually three, if we consider Kambuja Desa or modern Cambodia).] | So, in all likelihood, Chanakya, the Mauryas, the Nandas and later the Guptas were associated with thisMagadha - the one on the western parts of ancient India ~ i.e. Prachya, Eastern Country; Praesii or Prasioi to the Greeks. Even Jarasandha was associated with this Magadh (Prachya/ Praseii or Prasioi to the Greeks). | After the great dharma-yuddha (battle of ideas, principles, vision, inclusivity and progress - for the future of humanity, for a prosperous and vibrant society) - this Magadha became the foremost of ancient kingdoms with the new capital Pataliputra, a port city on the banks of the Ganges (~ this 'Ganges' could be a reference to ancient India). BG 10.31: || srotasām asmi jāhnavī || ~ "and of flowing waters I am the Ganga." [Here, 'Ganga' is a reference to India.] Did Lothal have anything to do with the port city? ~ The Nandas and Mauryas ruled this kingdom. And even the Guptas. ~ The Mauryas built the celebrated Mauryan Empire that spanned far and wide. | For the Maurya Chandragupta to have fought the Greeks all the way from the eastern parts of modern India (the other Magadha, that is) is quite far-fetched, especially given the time and logistics involved - equipment, cavalry, elephants, provisions, other paraphernalia and so on. | The etymology of Pataliputra is unclear. "Putra" means son, and "pāţali" is a species of rice or the plant Bignonia suaveolens. However, given that Krishn was a manifestation of Bhairava - the Primordial sound, this name may have evolved from Patal Bhairava.

Chanakya was a Brahmana, implying erudition.  [~ A "Brahmana" was someone who trod in the path of knowledge - Brahmacharya. [Brhm refers to knowledge, wisdom and enlightenment. Goddess Sarasvati is also known as Devi Brahmi or Brahmani.] Brahmacharya does not indicate celibacy. That is mistranslation. The Vedic Rishis and Rishikas were not required to be celibate. It was a matter of choice, not compulsion. In Sanaatan Dharma there is no such thing as compulsion or straitjacketing. It is a 'way of life'.] | Chanakya is also addressed by two honorifics: Pandit and Acharya. ~ "Pandit" indicates a wise, learned and enlightened person. "Acharya" means: "He who instructs through his own behavior (acharan)". That is the mark of a true teacher/guru. His father, Rishi Canak, too was a teacher/professor, and hence was also known as Acharya Canak. Chanakya means: son of Canak. [Rishi or Rishika is an honorific indicating erudition.] | The 'sikha' (also called 'shikha') is a Sanskrit word that refers to a long tuft, or lock of hair left on the top or on the back of the shaven head of a male Brahmana (erudite or learned person). However, traditionally, all males were required to wear a 'sikha', yet, today it is seen mainly amongst temple priests. The 'sikha' is tied back or knotted during the performance of rites or ceremonies. Only funerals and death anniversaries are performed with the 'sikha' tuft untied. |Maurya comes from 'Moriya' or 'Mura'. [Pali: Mora.] It is derived from 'Mor' meaning, peacock. With time Moriya/Mura became 'Maurya'. The Moriya were peacock-feather gatherers and Chandragupta's mother hailed from this clan. There is some indication that she was the daughter of a village headman, others indicate that she was the chief attendant (dasi) of the despotic Dhana Nanda (and that the latter sired Chandragupta); this makes Chandragupta a 'dasi-putra'. (Though some versions state that he belonged to a minor clan - the Moriya or Mura, and that his father was the chief of a forest area called Pippatavana/Pippalivana.) It is also believed that the Mura/Moriya clan was an offshoot of the Shakya clan - to which Prince Siddharth, later Shri Gautam Buddh, belonged. | The Sanskrit language has no equivalent for a slave. [Das/Dasi = attendant.] | Even the celebrated Gupta emperors came from humble origins as did the Nandas. Dhana Nanda (son of Mahapadma Nanda) was the last ruler of the Nanda dynasty. Dhana Nanda was of course despised on account of his meanness and unscrupulous nature and the wickedness of his disposition.

Some accounts indicate that Chanakya was a "Dramila". Now, "Dramila" means, "running away" or "escaping". It is possible that this word was used (by our ancients) to refer to the people who escaped the great deluge that swallowed up Dvarka (Dvaravati). Later, these displaced people settled down in other parts. Chanakya probably was born into one such family. |"Dramila" is believed to be the root of the word "Dravida" by some scholars. Therefore, perhaps with the passage of time, this word - Dramila - underwent certain changes, and gave rise to a new word, "Dravida". ~ It is not indicative of 'race'. The Indian Civilization (the Sindhu-Sarasvati Civilization) is 'Aryavarsha' (~ abode of the Arya people; land of the noble ones; Arya = noble, noble-natured or people who followed a pattern of life based on noble values. Varsha = continent, in Sanskrit). | There are multiple opinions about Chanakya's birthplace. According to Buddhist texts, his birthplace was Takshashila - located in north-western ancient India; he attended the famed university at the age of sixteen. The university offered courses spanning a period of more than eight years. So prominent was the place where Chanakya received his education that it goes to show the making of the genius. After acquiring vast knowledge in various branches of study, the young Chanakya... believing in the dissemination of knowledge and not in the storage of it, became a professor (acharya) of economics and political science at the ancient Takshashila University. His students looked up to him as an ideal teacher who inspired and exemplified great knowledge. | Chanakya's life was connected to two cities: Takshashila and Pataliputra (Megasthenes' Palibothra - refer the passages above). This Pataliputra (originally built by Krishn) was the capital of the Magadha kingdom on the western regions of ancient India (it was also known as Prachya or Eastern Country; Praesii or Prasioi to the Greeks). This Pataliputra was connected to Takshashila by Uttarapatha, the northern high road of commerce. | Chanakya was still a teacher (acharya) at the Takshashila University when certain seminal geo-political events took place. Gandhara Republic (it was an important kingdom and probably consisted much of ancient/Vedic Upaganasthan, meaning: land [sthan] of the allied clans) was unable to come out of the shock of the comprehensive defeat at the hands of the province of Porus, when a new contingency loomed over Takshashila. Thousands of refugees poured into Takshashila - as a result of the widespread attacks by the armies of Alexander. Faced with this sudden influx, important and influential personalities decided to extend shelter to the refugees on humanitarian grounds. Accordingly, a stretch of land outside Takshashila was allotted to them. This incident was (however) just a precursor to a series of events which reverberated across ancient India - as a result of the attacks of Alexander. At such a time, Chanakya responded to the call of duty ~ to salvage the situation and save the country from the onslaught of the invaders. [Alexander was not Arya. The Greeks were regarded as Yavana. ~ Yavana indicates a people who are reasonably cultured, knowledgeable, great builders and architects, and yet... indulge in un-Aryan (ignoble) behaviour like slave-taking, buying and selling of humans in markets, plunder and pillage, misbehaviour with women, and so on. | Mlechcha, on the other hand, implies uncivilized or savage.] ~ Chanakya left Takshashila University for Patliputra, (Megasthenes' Palibothra) ~ which paved the way for watershed changes in the politics of ancient India and Patliputra. A masterful political strategist, he was an ace at turning tables irrespective of the circumstances. Praised for his profound political wisdom, diplomacy in a politically charged environment also shows his long-term thinking and clarity of vision, besides the ability to stay calm in trying situations. | Chanakya is also known as 'Kaultilya' - the wily one (for his guiles). However, Vishnugupt probably is a different person ~ possibly a redactor of the original work of Kautilya.

~ Issues are notone-dimensional or simplistic, and therefore, there are or have been no instant or simplistic solutions either. This has been the norm. Statecraft/kutniti/politics has never been played out between or involved upright, high-minded and righteous souls... simply because the dynamics of human nature is different. [And, this includes the nature, mindset and worldview of the general populace too. Or, at least, a large chunk of it. 'Coz statecraft/kutini/politics does not exist in a vacuum/void or in isolation. It involves interaction and social dynamics. The mindset or worldview of the people shapes the social conditions. The general populace has never quite been upright, righteous souls, themselves. Therefore, statecraft/kutniti/politics have always involved dealing with a multitude of emotions. In a diverse nation like India that is self-explanatory.] Reciprocity (or some kind of barter system) has always been the norm. (~ The intensity, though, may have differed from era/yug to era/yug.) ~ And yet, Krishn, Chanakya and even Shri Ram or even the Mauryans and the Guptas have been statesmen, not mere politicians (~ 'coz their motives have not been selfish or self-serving). They were not only clear about what needed to be done, but also (most importantly) were clear about how to go about it. It is here that their sagacity/prudence, astuteness, foresight, superior intelligence and wiles and guiles came into good use. (refer the passage on Yug Purush.) ~ Their decisions, words and deeds were based on a rational analysis of the situation... factoring in long-term aspects. They prudently eschewed short-term considerations or ad hoc-ism (~ their actions were essentially a means to the broader vision, the  bigger picture/canvas - the larger goals/objectives, not personal glory). | Neither Krishn nor Chanakya were up against well-intentioned and upright, righteous souls. Nor was the prevalent society perfect. On the contrary, it was fractious; besides people were either too self-centred or too aloof to even protest. Things were simply spiraling out of control. ~ But, how did Chanakya generate the funds that was necessary to fructify his vision? How did Krishn do it? How did he generate the funds to rebuild the city of Dvarka (after the relentless attacks by Jarasandh on Mathura/Megasthenes' Methora)? We don't quite know. ~ Maybe the motives, purposes, goals and objectives, contributions, opportunities and momentum created were what mattered and therefore gained primacy, not the means. And so, the concept of 'lotus palm' and 'lotus feet' - the dharmic freedom of inner detachment... and the analogies regarding the lotus (which grows in muddy water and yet remains pristine) and the swan- whose feathers do not get damp despite remaining in water. Both metaphors indicate a real karm-yogi, a nishkama karm-yogi - such a karm-yogi is called hamsah - the swan.] | Also, we find the system of 'utkoch'; this word could be interpreted as 'ghus' (in modern terminology). ~ Perhaps our ancients interpreted it as 'gift' or reward or consideration - for services rendered. The 'utkoch' probably varied depending on the matters, issues and services provided. ~ So, did our ancients prudently accept human nature, societal dynamics as well as the nature and dynamics of statecraft/kutniti/politics besides commercial and mercantile activities? ['Coz commercial functions and statecraft/kutniti/politics have never been mutually exclusive; they have always been part of the same ecosystem. Power-brokers and middlemen have always existed.] ~ So, did such a rational and prudent world-view (instead of an utopian or rhetorical one) in turn lead to the streamlining and smooth functioning of administrative and commercial matters, instead of avoidable logjams, stagnation and bottlenecks? 'Coz our ancient texts don't seem to be over-flowing with stories or anecdotes about 'bribery', and the like. [~ However, it is unlikely that people would have been drastically different.] Chanakya was prescient and pithy: "It's just as difficult to detect an official's dishonesty as it is to discover how much water is drunk by the swimming fish". [This can be applied w.r.t the general populace as well.] Even the wise Nasreddin Hodja advised that one must understand the nature of the beast before trying to tame it. This is timeless wisdom. ~ Therefore, did our ancients devise a mechanism that legalized 'utkoch' - besides giving it a semblance of respectability... not only with regard to nomenclature but also by bringing in slabs, ceilings, parameters and the like? Did they recognize 'utkoch' as an important aspect/function - sort of an intrinsic cog in the wheel of statecraft/kutniti/politics as well as that of economic activity (commercial functions)? Did they also recognize it as part of economic activity itself as well as a means of employment generation? 'Coz (e.g.) gambling was very much prevalent. ~ My guess is as good as yours. Also, is that the reason why our ancient texts are not littered with stories and/or anecdotes about 'utkoch' and the like? Simply because it may have been an accepted fact and so, did not raise eyebrows? 'Coz given the times and given the nature of their functions - which was very much a part and parcel of statecraft/kutniti/politics (of which 'utkoch' was an intrinsic cog in the wheel), it is unlikely that Shri Ram or Shri Krishn or for that matter Chanakya, the Mauryans or the Guptas would have got on without this particular cog - given human nature (~ they would have had to deal with a cross-section of people and emotions). After all, statecraft or kutniti is all about dealing with human nature, mere people-management (abstract phraseology) is not enough. ~ And so, reciprocity (or some kind of barter system) has always been the norm. (~ The intensity, though, may have differed from era/yug to era/yug. Population as well as social complexities too would have been lesser.) | However, despite power-brokers, middlemen, statecraft/kutniti/politics and 'utkoch', ancient India achieved remarkable strides in innovation, creativity, research, town-planning, trade and other economic activity; science, mathematics, astronomy, metallurgy, art, architecture, literature, poetry and sculpture flourished, and the cultural development of ancient India reached its zenith. So, our ancients may not have viewed 'utkoch' as a stymieing factor to development and progress; they probably accepted it as a constant/reality and an integral part of human nature, and therefore took practical measures and rationalized it, instead of letting it fester or tilting at windmills. Also, avarice, gambling, petty crimes and so on will always exist; a society will not function otherwise. Only when their intensity increases tremendously do such activities or traits become a bane (i.e. hamper societal progress and vibrancy). | Dynasty or lineage too does not seem to have been an issue. From the ancient Himalayan kingdom to the celebrated Rama Empire, the Pandava Empire to the Mauryas and the Gupta Empire - all have been dynasties/empires. In a kaleidoscopic ancient India, they lent stability, this in turn helped ancient India to prosper and progress. Besides these dynasties/empires, there have been several other empires and kingdoms led by able rulers and administrators - under whose guidance and leadership parts of ancient India flourished. Administration/administrative functions and governance (which are also intrinsic to empires and kingdoms) requires extensive networking (since it is a cumulative or sum-total of various functions), holding of dialogues, decision-making and alliance-building is necessary, and therefore familiarity is an important criteria. Besides, arriving at a common roadmap/framework for the future. The 'Cakravartin system of governance' was very much dynasty/empire-based - lead by an able and prominent member of a preeminent kula or clan (~ else it might have been 'too many cooks spoil the broth'); there have been exceptions though, when able persons from modest origins have risen and shone... and gone on to become progenitors of dynasties/empires. [For a Cakravartin-raja, dharma and karm-yog gained primacy. They probably arrived at a shared roadmap/guidelines/framework/architecture for the future - with their allies and other smaller kings/chieftains/satraps (janapadin). A Cakravartin-raja was (thus) a unifier, a binding force/factor; a leader, a ruler, an administrator, a teacher, a guiding spirit, a catalyst, a reformer and a well-wisher of the people; one who could take diversities (of all kinds) along. His empire was not a monolith, but rather a confederation (with maximum internal autonomy). There were kings and chieftains (janapadin) governing their own big and small regions/kingdoms/territories (janapadas and mahajanapadas), and yet, they all functioned under the wise and reassuring presence of the Cakravartin. ~ He was the proverbial banyan tree beneath which all others sheltered. BG 10.27: || narāṇāḿ ca narādhipam || ~ "and among humans I am the monarch" (Cakravartin). ~ BG 10.25: || aśvatthaḥ sarva-vṛkṣāṇāḿ || ~ "Of all trees I am the (asvatthah)" - fig tree (it can mean: banyan tree as well as the Peepal/aśvatthaḥ, or maybe both).| Cakravartin were not harbingers of stagnation or short-termism or ad hocism/tactical measures; they had the mettle, capacity and foresight to effectively deal with societal dynamics, take longer-term planning (a lucid plan of action), set strategic objectives and follow through with them; they did not shy-away or postpone reforms either, i.e. taking tangible measures for mindset change or for altering prejudices. They knew how to go about the latter - for it to be durable and organic. Optimism, a sense of hope and prioritizing were a hallmark to their leadership - it was integral to the way they led. ~ In fact, that is true leadership.] Perhaps stability, stature, reassurance and continuity were overweening factors (important pillars) for the rest to fall in place. [A nucleus is necessary.] Trying to rebuild the wheel or framework/architecture at short intervals may not have been prudent, probably counterproductive too (as is evident from the post Gupta era gradual drift and flounder - the repercussions of which have been extremely far-reaching). ~ Certain other line of work such as business, diplomacy, medicine, the legal profession and even entertainment (to some extent) - follow this trend/model, perhaps familiarity (generational ties) and the strength borne out of it (networking, ease of interaction, trust, confidence, etc) matters. These are critical intangibles, and not quite quantifiable. | The many monuments and ruins are a testimony to aesthetics; none of them are an eyesore. Our ancients also lived in harmony with nature; they did not pollute the water-bodies, etc. Plastic and other non-biodegradable wastes were unknown to them. |Various sculptures and others forms of art tell us about the attitude towards 'tritiya-prakriti'. The nomenclature itself is an indication that three kinds of humans were accepted. Sculptures, art and texts also inform us about the attitude regarding kama (desire). BG 10.28: || prajanaś cāsmi kandarpaḥ || ~ "of causes for procreation I am Kandarpa (or Cupid), the god of love."Short-term marriage (termed 'Gandharva Vivaah') - that lasted for a few hours or a few days - were prevalent. No ritual was required, though the consent of the female was essential. Gandharva Vivaah happened either to beget progeny or for pleasure. [Maharshi Veda Vyasa was born out of one such marriage between Matsyakanya Satyavati and Maharshi Parashara. Matsyakanya does not mean daughter of a fisherman or even fisherwoman. The ancient Matsya kingdom probably is modern-day Rajasthan. Satyavati thus hailed from the ancient Matsya kingdom (of the Mahabharata times). She later became the queen of Hastinapura. ~ Ladies of the night too existed, but were referred to as ganikas and nagar-vadhus. [Appropriate measures for healthcare and hygiene were not withheld.] | The terminologies give us a glimpse into the mindset and culture of the earlier peoples and eras. [The earlier eras perhaps were able to streamline and rationalize, and thus the nation too prospered. The social conditions were therefore much less convoluted. They probably did not pile on unresolved issues and build a mountain out of it. It is ultimately self-defeating and counterproductive.] The Sanskrit language is a very erudite language. A very cultured language. The same can be said about the classical versions of other languages. [The cuss-words and/or derogatory terminologies and/or phraseology of modern times have no parallel either in the Sanskrit language or in the classical versions of other Indian languages. This (probably) is an indicator of what something as innocuous as phraseology or terminology can do to a people, a society and (thereby) a civilization. Coinage is easy; altering or reversing it is a Herculean task.] Therefore, our ancients very likely based their worldview on a rational and realistic analysis of human nature (characteristics, thought process, virtues, strengths, motivations, weaknesses/shortcomings/inadequacies et al) and human society, and thus built-in appropriate measures to prevent and/or mitigate unwanted/unpleasant aspects. [~ All this is before the post-Gupta era drift and flounder. ~ Not only did India lose her preeminence in various areas, her reputation and respect (in the eyes of the world) as a cultured civilization too was lost at the altar of myopia, expediency and avarice. The state of the river Ganga was reminiscent of the state of the Indian civilization ('Aryavarsha') and Arya Dharma.] 

[Note: ~ The character of a society or civilization can be easily gauged by how it views women (~ that is not to say womenfolk are merely 'mothers' and 'sisters'). | Draupadi was insulted and none spoke up (including the likes of Dhritatashtra, Bheeshma and Dronacharya - who enjoyed much clout) - due to fear of antagonizing Duryodhana or due to petty considerations (like Dronacharya - a guru no less). So engrossed were they in deliberating about who should ascend the throne - Yudhishtira or Duryodhana - that they were unable to see adharm unfold right in front of their eyes. So much for foresight and priority. Krishn later remarks: a society that stood by silently and simply watched - when a prominent and accomplished person like Draupadi (who was also the princess of Panchal, daughter of King Drupad, and so on) was insulted in such an unarya manner - in the most derogatory language and gestures, what will such a society do when ordinary women are mistreated. | What kind of society or civilization emerges is in the hands of the people... due to their actions, conditioning, thought process, vocabulary, idioms, hygiene, civic sense, mindset, attitude, worldview and so forth ~ all of which influence and shape up the following generations... and thereby the social fabric. | For our ancients it was woven around Arya Dharma... which later unraveled. | Bheeshma, Dronacharya, Dhritarashtra, Pandu and Vidur, Karna, the Kauravas and the Pandavas, Draupadi and her brother, Drishtadumna, Ghatotkach, etc - were all 'born' or begotten through various medical procedures (including advanced genetic engineering and cloning technology). They were unnatural humans; they could not procreate naturally. [Bheeshma refused to get himself cloned. ~ He was the outcome of DNA taken from multiple sources - after seven unsuccessful attempts. He was practically immortal, and thus the metaphor of 'shara-sajya' or 'bed of arrows' has been used. Despite grievous injuries, he was unable to leave his mortal body.] ~ Even Draupadi's five sons (one by each of the Pandavas): Prativindhya, Sutasoma, Srutakirti, Satanika and Srutakarma are said to have been spitting images of their respective fathers - the 5 Pandavas. This again points towards cloning. Therefore, 'the Pandavas announcing to Kunti their arrival with excellent "alms", and a supposedly busy Kunti replying without turning to look at Draupadi (the supposed "alms") and advising/ordering the brothers to share the "alms" equally amongst the five of them' ~ is a later-day addition, courtesy translators - who, unable to understand technology, etc improvised. | The great 'dharma-yuddha'(battle of ideas, principles, vision, inclusivity and progress - for the future of humanity, for a prosperous and vibrant society) also eliminated unnatural humans and destructive weaponry and allowed the earth to "heal"... thus civilization could progress naturally and peacefully. | Some genetic defects were found in subsequent generations which too were set right through medical procedures. 'Kaalsarpa Dosha', 'Sarpa Dosha' or 'Nag Dosha' refers to genetic disorder. A genetic disorder is an illness caused by abnormalities in genes or chromosomes. ~ If one observes the shape of DNA, it resembles two snakes coiled together (something we now refer to as: DNA coiled into the double helix structure as a ladder, a twisted rope ladder, or a spiral staircase). In ancient times, our Rishis/Munis (learned persons) visualized everything ~ and thus (euphemistically or maybe symbolically) referred to DNA as 'Sarpa', and any disorder in the DNA was hence termed as 'Sarpa Dosha'. [Dosha = bio-energies found in the body.] Raja Janamajaya/Janamejaya's 'yagna' (euphemism for a 'scientific procedure' to correct 'Kaalsarpa Dosha') took up twelve years. [~ A big chunk of the 'yagna' etc mentioned in our ancient texts is merely a reference to one or the other scientific or medical procedure. From the narrative we can figure out what sort of procedure has been indicated. Also, the logo of the Indian Medical Association is self-explanatory.] With Parikshit (Janamejaya's father) too there is a 'sarpa' involved (though the story has largely been mistranslated). This 'sarpa' is indicative of some genetic disorder. Maybe Rishi Shameek and his son (Shringi) diagnosed this disorder, but were unable to cure/eliminate it. Perhaps during the procedure itself or while undergoing therapy the disorder aggravated and/or his body reacted negatively to the therapy/medication and thus, Parikshit died (as indicated by 'Takshak hiding himself within an apple'.) His son Janmejaya ascended the throne ~ and promptly took remedial measures - to correct his own genetic anomaly/disorder ('Sarpa Dosha' or 'Kaalsarpa Dosha'). In all likelihood, Janmejaya probably engaged a battery of renowned Maharshis, Rishis and Munis - highly knowledgeable and learned persons (to conduct research and experiments... so as to find a remedy.) And this time - after twelve years' of continuous effort - they were successful.

Human nature or traits are innate or intrinsic aspects and hence different from conditioning. | Negative mindset perpetrated for generations or information overload, etc can result in negative conditioning... which in turn percolates into the social fabric and thereby affects social conditions. However, negative conditioning can be altered, through sustained efforts and tangible steps/measures. Various greats and even unsung people have successfully altered or curbed negative mindset, conditioning, etc. | While certain aspects of human nature is interlinkedwith certain activities or line of work, and therefore statecraft/kutniti/politics, diplomacy and commercial and mercantile functions have never been without quid pro quo, or some sort of reciprocity and even 'utkoch'. Given the very nature of the former (competitiveness, profit maximization, information gathering, manipulation, manoeuvres, alliance-building and the like), the latter are intrinsic, innate and (hence) an integral part of these activities; it is not merely top-down but also bottom-up. | Maybe our ancients took a sensible view, and (therefore) legalized or regularized it - by putting a cap or ceiling and bringing in parameters etc along with appropriate nomenclature and so on. | However, the purposes or motives may differ. And therefore, 'lotus feet', 'lotus palm' (the dharmic freedom of inner detachment), and the swan analogy (~ and the need to separate milk from water).] 

...........................................................

Brahmn(Cosmic Light or Light Divine/ Supreme/Universal Consciousness) andMahat or Ishvara/Ishvari(Primal Creative Energy/Cosmic Entity).

BG 11.12: || divi surya-sahasrasya bhaved yugapad utthita yadi bhah sadrisi sa syad bhasas tasya mahatmanah || ~ "If the radiance of a thousand suns were to suddenly come forth in the sky, that would be like the light of the Param-atma." (Supreme Cosmic Spirit or Energy - Supreme/Universal Consciousness.) | [mahatmanah = higher soul/Param-atma. ~ Krishn is referring to the impersonal, unmanifested Brahmn (the Absolute) and Brahm-jyotih (Cosmic Light or Light Divine).]

Brahmn - the Absolute; in other words: Cosmic Light or Light Divine (divine effulgence); also: Param-atma - Supreme/Universal Consciousness. All creation-related work is the work of Fire (i.e. Cosmic Fire, Cosmic Light/Brahmn-jyotih or Light Divine.) [... The impersonal Brahmn is thus revered as the Supreme Creator(Srashtaa).] |Brahmn is defined as the one self-existent impersonal spirit - the Divine Essence, from which all things emanate, by which they are sustained, and to which they return. ~ It is the light (divine effulgence) that impersonalists perceive in the Nirguna (unmanifested - avyaktah/Niraakar) mode of God/Almighty. |AUM (also written as OM) represents Brahmn (the Supreme Creator/Srashtaa), as well as the whole of creation. | The impersonal Brahmn - Cosmic Light or Light Divine (divine effulgence) - is thus the unmanifested (avyaktah/Niraakar) form of the Almighty. 

~ Mahat or Ishvara/Ishvari (Primal Creative Energy) is the Cosmic Entity - the supreme power/authority of the universe/cosmos - adhaataa (above whom there is no other): the Cosmic Ruler (Jagat-patih - Sovereign of the Universe/Vishva Nath and Lord of Creation; Jagadishvara-Jagadishvari/Jagadish/Tribhuvaneshvar-Tribhuvaneshvari) and Cosmic Teacher (Palanhare). |The Cosmic Entity is the highest possible conception of the Absolute (impersonal, unmanifested Brahmn - Cosmic Light or Light Divine; divine effulgence), which is beyond all thought. Thus, Ishvara/Ishvari is manifested Brahmn - vyaktah/Saakar Brahmn. ~ And so, Ishvara/Ishvari is Brahma - the Creator. In other words: Brahmā isthe Creator aspect of the Cosmic Entity/Primordial Being (Ishvara/Ishvari). Mahat or Ishvara/Ishvari is (thus) also known as Vishwakarma: Creator of the Universe. | As manifested Brahmn (vyaktah/saakar Brahmn), Ishvara/Ishvari (the Cosmic Entity) is Omswaroop (manifestation of OM). ~ S/He is the motive power and guiding spirit behind the mathematically precise universes. S/He is also kartaa: The doer, maargah: The path, and neyah: The guide.

Thus, it is said: The seen (manifested - vyaktah/Saakar Brahmn) and the unseen (unmanifested - avyaktah/Niraakar Brahmn) are both one. ~ This explains the concept of Advaita (monism - Nirguna/Niraakar [formless/unmanifested] mode of God/Almighty, i.e. the impersonal, unmanifested Brahmn); Dvaita (dualism; impersonal, unmanifested or avyaktah/Niraakar Brahmn i.e. Cosmic Light/Light Divine/Divine Effulgence + manifested or vyaktah/Saakar Brahmn - the Cosmic Entity/Ishvara/Ishvari) and āstika (theism). | Unlike the rigorous monism (Advaita) of the Upanishads, the Srimad Bhagavad-Gita also integrates dualism (Dvaita) and theism (āstika).

[Here is Tagore's 'Pratham Adi taba Shakti': link01.]

BG 10.33: || dvandvaḥ sāmāsikasya ca|| ~ "And among compound words I am the dual compound." ~ A reference to the Cosmic Duality (~ the concept of ArdhaNarishvara or more precisely -ArdhaNarishvari.)

BG 10.35: || māsānāḿ mārga-śīrṣo 'ham ṛtūnāḿ kusumākaraḥ || ~ "Of months I am Mārgaśīrṣa [November-December], and of seasons I am spring".|Mrigashīrsha: Sanskrit mṛgaśiras (also spelled Mārgaśīrṣa/Mṛgaśira) - the 5th nakṣatra or lunar mansion - as used in Vedic astronomy and astrology, is the constellation Orion (also known as Kaalpurush, meaning: Timeless, Eternal or Ancient). ~ The first two carana/pada(quarters) of this nakṣatra are part of Vṛṣabha Rāśi or Taurus (bull). The latter half of this star belongs to Mithuna Rāśi (Gemini). | Gemini - the twins, but that is not literal. ~ Here, it a reference to the concept of ArdhaNarishvara or ArdhaNarishvari. ~ Tagore's "Jana-Gana-Mana Adhinayaka" incorporates this essence: link.

[Note: As for the Bull or Vṛṣabha aspect: Dharma is generally symbolized in Sanaatan Dharmic thought by the bull (Vrishabha). ~ Thus, Lord Narayana (the Cosmic Entity/Ishvara - or rather, the Vishnu or preserver/stabilizer/maintainer aspect of the Cosmic Entity) is also called Vṛṣabha - the Great Bull. ... This is because, S/He is Dharmadhyaksha - Lord of Dharma (Vrisha Uttamam or Supreme Dharma). ~ Perhaps S/He dispenses justice - for negative (Prarabda) karma - during presence amongst humanity (as one or the other avatar). ~ In case the negative (Prarabda) karma has not been "washed off" by the performance of adequate amounts of good karma - for the benefit of humanity and society, that is.] ~ Copious amounts of good/positive karma is required to "wash off" (any existing or carried over) Prarabda karma (negative karma); this in turn gives the individual and/or the jiva-atma (human soul) a clean slate, or a positive amount (remainder) of good karma. | Therefore, probably, the transmigration of a human soul (jiva-atma) is as per the presence of or lack thereof... of a positive amount (remainder) of good karma. |Karma is not comeuppance or retribution, but an opportunity for redemption. |Bhu-Loka or the Earth-Realm (part of the Madhya-loka or Middle Planets) is karm-bhoomi; it is sort of a launch-pad from where the jiva-atma (human soul or mere Self) can reach (i.e. transmigrate to) the other worlds/lokas (Urdhva-loka or Higher Planets and Adho-loka or Lower Realms, also known as Bilva-Svarga - technologically and materially opulent but spiritually deficient lokas/planets) - based on one's karma. Excessive Prarabda karma (negative karma) = the jiva-atma (human soul) may even have to suffer in one of the Hellish planets/Narak-loka.| ~ In Sanaatan Dharmic thought there is no concept of rest in peace. Instead, there is the concept of Charaiveti: to keep going, in this cycle of samsara - the constant cycle of birth and re-birth - until one attains "moksha" (liberation) ~ based on one's (accumulated) positive karm, i.e. nishkam/selfless/non-glory-seeking action/service... that contributes towards the greater good or a better and vibrant society. ~ Every jiva-atma (human soul or mere Self) will be reborn based on its accumulated karm-phal, the fruits of one's karma, and (thus) get an opportunity to redeem itself.] 

'Avatar' means: descent, and refers to a descent of the divine into earthly form. Avatar comes from the Sanskrit avatirna: "manifest/descent from the Lord" (Cosmic Entity or Ishvara/Ishvari).| The manifestations of the Lord are innumerable, like rivulets flowing from inexhaustible sources of water. BG 10.40: ||nānto 'sti mama divyānāḿ vibhūtīnāḿ parantapa eṣa tūddeśataḥ prokto vibhūter vistaro mayā|| ~ "There is no end of My divine manifestations, O Arjun. What I have spoken to you is but a mere indication of My infinite manifestations."|Apart from the direct manifestations, there are innumerable empowered manifestations. Partial avatars are called aḿśa. The indirectly empowered ones are called vibhūtis. [~ 'Avatar' is not to be misconstrued as incarnation or re-incarnation ~ since the Cosmic Entity/Primordial Being is not part of the cycle of samsara - the karmic cycle of birth and re-birth. 'Avatar' is not role play either. ... If we can understand what the avatars do, their contribution and purpose, we can then fully grasp the significance of the 'avatar' concept.]

~Lord Krishna is considered as the Cosmic Teacher and Cosmic Ruler, in his totality of manifestation. In other words: He is not an Avatar of the Cosmic Ruler/Teacher/Entity (the Primordial), but is considered as the Cosmic Entity (albeit, in human form) i.e. God manifest in human form (svayam Bhagavan) - the human manifestation [sagun swaroop] of the Cosmic Entity/Primordial Being - in his totality of manifestation. || krishnas tu bhagavan svayam || Krishn means, "the all-attractive/absorbing One" (~ also symbolized by the Universal Form of the Primordial).| However, although in their human forms, the avatars possess certain qualities. The 7th Vishnu (the Ram-avatar) possessed 12. While the 8th Vishnu (the Krishna-avatar) possessed all 16; thus he is Purna Avatar (~ one in whom divinity is manifested fully.) The 10th Vishnu (the Kalkiḥ-avatar or Kalkiḥ Maitreya), on the other hand, is regarded as 'Sampoorna Avatar' (~ a total, complete, all-encompassing avatar). Thus, this avatar is stated as indescribable (kim api). ~ Now whether this could also mean that Lord Krishna - in his totality of manifestation - is Lord Kalki (the Kalkiḥ-avatar or Kalkiḥ Maitreya) ~ my guess is as good as yours. [~ But the Kalkiḥ-avatar, a Knight-saviour, is regarded as Krishna+ and the best of the Dasavatara. ... A lone warrior who will stand against negativism and calamity at the end of Kaliyug (the 'Dark Age' - the age of ignorance/confusion/degeneration/decay; euphemistically also called the Metal/Machine Age or the ghor Kaliyug phase) and put things on the road to recovery. This avatar is also the least worldly of all the avatars - on account of association with kundalini.]

The Cosmic Entity has ten principal avatars or manifestations (not to be misconstrued for re-incarnation; the Cosmic Entity is not part of the samsara or karmic cycle of birth and re-birth) - to stabilize, preserve and guide the universe (and humanity) from time to time (as per:dharma-samsthapanarthaya sambhavami yuge yuge - to revive/rebuild/revitalize the principles of dharma - right, tangible actions for the greater/collective good, and karm-yog - individual and collective action i.e. effective, tangible and sustained karm-yog, even nishkama karm-yog ~ for the progress and betterment of society.) | TheDashavatara(link) refers to the ten principal avatars - as per hispromised: || yada yada hi dharmasya glanir bhavati bharata abhyutthanam adharmasya tadatmanam srjamy aham(BG 4.7) || ~ The Cosmic Entity manifests (as a transcendental avatar) ~ whenever there is a great amount of turmoil and/or stagnation, confusion, deterioration and degeneration, i.e. when societal churn/'manthan' becomes too great ~ to prevent a collapse of basic structure of mankind; to stabilize the events/situation from spiraling out of control, and to help and guide mankind/humanity face the challenges posed... whenever negativism become too dominant and/or when there is stagnation and/or a lack of a sense of direction; or when humanity is unable to find a doable/effective solution to their myriad issues (i.e. when the odds/problems/challenges/impediments overtake and loom above the collective ability of humanity to find an effective solution/remedy). ~ Thus, the Cosmic Entity is also known as kartaa: The doer, maargah: The path, and neyah: The guide. And thus, S/He is also known as 'Sudarshan' Vasudev Dhanvantari (the Supreme Druid) - who arrives to stem the churn/manthan/turmoil ~ to stabilize, and to re-energize/rejuvenate... by providing aoushata(remedy, solutions) ~ so that humanity can (gradually) "heal", i.e. overcome/surmount the odds/challenges and find/regain its rhythm/mojo. [Refer to Sahasrara Chakra, Kundalini, Ajna Chakra, etc - for 'Sudarshan Chakra'.] 

~ Narayana/Narayani or Keshavah (this nomenclature is not constrained by gender) is the Cosmic Ruler (Jagat-patih) and Cosmic Teacher (Palanhare); also known as Ishvara/Ishvari, Mahat, God or the Almighty. [Keshavah means: one who is the three: kah Brahma, ahVishnu and Isa Shiva; indicating the power of Creation, Maintenance/Preservationand Dissolution (i.e. the three aspects of Ishvara/Ishvari - the Cosmic Entity). Narayana, as Brahma(the Creator aspect) has created fourteen planetary systems; Narayana sustains, maintains and preserves the universe as Vishnu (the Preserver/Maintainer aspect) and dissolves the universe at the end of maha-kalpa as Shiva or Rudra. ~ Thus the holy Trimurti is non-different from Narayana.|Narayana is the name of Ishvara/Cosmic Entity/Primordial Being ~ in the infinite, all pervading form. Narayana also means: Enlightened Supreme/Primordial Being. Also: well-wisher and refuge of all beings. 'Coz Ishvara does not discriminate ~ as indicated by the Universal Form of the Primordial.] 

A quote from Swami Vivekananda's speech (Welcome Address - Chicago, Sept 11, 1893) ~ in response to the warm and cordial welcome he received: "As the different streams having their sources in different places all mingle their water in the sea, so, O Lord, the different paths which men take through different tendencies, various though they appear, crooked or straight, all lead to Thee." 

[Here is 'Tahare Arati Kare Chandra Tapan Deva Manava'link.]

|| Ekam Sat Vipraha Bahudha Vadanti || ~ Truth (meaning: the Eternal/Shaashvata i.e. Sat/Satya; also, timeless essence/knowledge - para vidya) is one, but the wise know/call it as many. | In other words: God is one, but we can approach the Almighty in many ways.

|| eko vai nārāyaṇa āsīn na brahmā na īśāno nāpo nāgni-samau neme dyāv-āpṛthivī nanakṣatrāṇi na sūryaḥ || ~ "In the beginning of the creation there was onlythe Supreme/Primeval Being Nārāyaṇa. There was no Brahmā, no Śiva, no water, no fire,nomoon, no stars in the sky, no sun." 

~ This (perhaps) indicates that... in the beginning (of the creation) only the Vishnu aspect (i.e. the Preserver/Stabilizer/Maintainer aspect) of the Primordial Being existed. 

|| nārāyaṇaḥ paro devas tasmāj jātaś caturmukhaḥ tasmād rudro 'bhavad devaḥ sa ca sarva-jñatāḿ gataḥ || ~ "Nārāyaṇa is the Supreme/Primordial/Primeval Being ~ from whom Brahmā was born, from whom Śiva was born." 

~ This indicates the gradual 'birth' (coming about/emergence) of the other two aspects of the Primordial Being #1. Brahmā(the Creator - i.e. the 'Srashtaa' or Creator aspectof the Primordial Being) and #2. Śiva (~ the Dissolution aspect of the Primordial Being).

BG 10.33: || dhātāhaḿ viśvato-mukhaḥ|| ~ "and of creators I am Brahmā." 

BG 10.23: || rudranam sankaras casmi || ~ "Of all the Rudras I am Sankara" [Rudra-Śiva].

~ The Brahmā (Creator aspect) and Śiva (Dissolution aspect) are time-specific. While the Vishnu(Preserver/Stabilizer/Maintainer) aspect of the Primordial Being (Cosmic Entity) is eternal.

Thus, BG 10.33: || aham evākṣayaḥ kālo || ~ "I am also inexhaustible time."

And, BG 10.34: || mṛtyuḥ sarva-haraś cāham udbhavaś ca bhaviṣyatām || ~ "I am all-consuming time, and I am the generating principle/cause/energy of all that is yet to be." (~ Alternatively: "I am all-consuming time, and I am too the birth of all that shall come into being.")

~ The universe is mathematically precise, 'coz time and tide wait for none. ~ And so, the commencement and closure of yugs and maha-yugs; the transition from one yug to another or one maha-yug to another, too will happen on time. The universe/cosmos functions as per the Cosmic Plan. |The Cosmic Entity is not part of maanav-species; however, the avatars appear in their human/transcendental form (leela-avatars). And, whichever form the Purna Avatar or sagun swaroop (totality of manifestation/God manifest in human form) appears, is the Universal Form of the Primordial. |The Cosmic Entity does not discriminate ~ as indicated by the Universal Form of the Primordial. ~ Tagore envisioned a parallelism - the parallelism of welding together into one body various peoples (~ and this is reminiscent of the Universal Form of the Primordial. Refer the relevant passages.) 

......................................................................

The Bhagavad-Gita is a magnificent text; the jewel of ancient Eastern spiritual wisdom, it is a text for all time, it is ever relevant, it is universal, and it belongs to the world. The eighteen chapters (and 700 verses) are a part of the celebrated Mahabharata ('The Great History of the Bharatas'), and a treasure-trove of guidance, knowledge, wisdom, philosophical concepts and insights... about the purpose of life, the two-fold path or dvi-vidha nistha - for karm-yogis and gyan-yogis respectively; about dharma (dharmic principles - right/positive, tangible actions for the greater/collective good) and karm-yog (walking the talk; to act, individually and collectively in a sustained manner - toward the common/collective goals/objectives); about prioritizing; about the need to differentiate between the positive and enduring (what is necessary/required/needed) and the negative and transient/ephemeral (trivia) - the swan/hamsah analogy; to finding happiness and contentment, inner transformation and tranquility; harmonious living; to building a good society - a better and vibrant society; about the cosmos, about the Cosmic Entity's various manifestations, the Universal Form, and much more. ~ Including: the distinction between the Higher Self (Supersoul/Param-atma) and the mere Self (Jiva-atma or the individual soul) - about the organic and deep connection (yog/sanjog) between Jiva-atma (the mere Self or individual soul - finites) and Param-atma (the Higher Self or Supersoul  - theInfinite). ~ This union of Jiva-atma (the mere Self or individual soul) with the Param-atma (the Higher Self or Supersoul) is called Sanaatan Dharma; in other words: connecting (yog/sanjog) with the Higher Self ~ seeking communion (yog/sanjog) with the Universal Consciousness (Brahmn or Param-atma). This results in Self-realization. |Brahmn is defined as the one self-existent impersonal spirit - the Divine Essence, from which all things emanate, by which they are sustained, and to which they return. ~ It is the light (divine effulgence, Cosmic Light or Divine Light) that impersonalists perceive in the Nirguna(unmanifested - avyaktah/Niraakar) modeof God/Almighty. | The Jiva-atma (the mere Self or individual soul), on the other hand - transmigrates from one material body to another or to the other worlds/loka - based on one's karma. ~ Karma is not comeuppance or retribution, but an opportunity for redemption. [Therefore, perhaps, the transmigration of a Jiva-atma (the mere Self or individual soul) is as per the presence of or lack thereof... of a positive amount (remainder) of good karma.]

BG 2.13: || dehino 'smin yatha dehe kaumaram yauvanam jara tatha dehantara-praptir dhiras tatra na muhyati || ~ "As the embodied soul continuously passes, in the material body, from childhood to youth to old age, the soul similarly transmigrates from one body to another. The self-realized (wherein the mere Self/Jiva-atma has achieved communion with the Higher Self/Param-atma, and therefore experienced eternal bliss or spiritual ecstasy of self-realization - sat-cit-ananda) or the temperate (dhirah = the temperate) is not bewildered/deluded by such a change."

BG 2.22|| vāsānsi jīrNāni yathā vihāya navāni grihNāti naro.aparāNi tathā śarīrāNi vihāya jīrNānyanyāni sanyāti navāni dehī || ~"Just as a human being puts on new garments, casting off old and worn-out ones, the soul (Jiva-atma or mere Self) similarly takes up residence within new material bodies, giving up the old and infirm ones." 

The verses can also be taken as a conversation between Jiva-atma (the mere Self or individual soul, finite ~ represented by Arjun) and the Param-atma (the Higher Self or Supersoul, theInfinite ~ Sri Krishn. ... Since the Cosmic Entity is manifested Brahmn - vyaktah/Saakar Brahmn; Krishn is a male manifestation - transcendental form or leela-avatar - of the Cosmic Entity, the Primordial.) | Arjun (and possibly even Draupadi) probably realized that Krishn was no ordinary human. Tagore said: aamar khela jakhon chhilo tomar shoney, takhon keye tumi ta keye janto. ~ Tagore also said: praan chay chokkhu na chay... sundar eshe phire jaye tobe kaar lagi mithya ae shojja. ~ Only the enlightened or self-realized (wherein the mere Self/Jiva-atma has achieved communion with the Higher Self/Param-atma, and therefore experienced the eternal/bliss or spiritual ecstasy of self-realization - sat-cit-ananda) can recognize the avatars ~ 'coz they become a connected part of the greater cosmos. This happens due to the awakening of the subtle and dormant coil of spiritual energy known as the kundalini (which exists in the sacrum bone - a large, triangular bone - at the base of the spine. The process of Enlightenment or in other words Self-realization involves the gentle awakening of this living and conscious energy, so that it pervades the individual's entire being. Once this occurs, an individual is no longer disconnected from the universe around them - i.e. he/she is no longer confined inside his/her own head (due to ego, confusion, delusion, vainglory, etc). Instead, the mind is lit up, in a manner of speaking; the metaphoric dimaag ki batti is lit up - possibly depicted by the "halo"; it brings about self-knowledge and contentment - leading to Sat-cit-ānanda, the eternal bliss/spiritual ecstasy (total contentment) of "self-realization". Kundalini awakening connects a human to his or her Atman (Supersoul/Higher Self) - which is the source of all things. When an individual become totally connected with it, such a person becomes a Buddha (the Enlightened One) - eternal and filled with pure/timeless knowledge (para vidya). ~ Thus, probably Arjun could fully understand/comprehend + imbibe all that Krishn imparted to him. ... And so, BG 10.37: || pāṇḍavānāḿ dhanañjayaḥ|| ~ "I am Arjun among the Pandavs". | However, though the number of verses is 700, there is indication suggesting that the old manuscripts had 745 verses. Whether there were more than 745 verses, many of which now lost in the mists of time ~ my guess is as good as yours.|Bypraan chay chokkhu na chay... sundar eshe phire jaye tobe kaar lagi mithya ae shojja -Tagore probably advised/cautioned against excessive ritualism and focus/emphasis on trivia (unimportant or transient aspects) ~ which clouds the mind and intellect - then one cannot connect to the greater whole, and so, one tends to miss the larger picture - the enduring (~ as symbolized by the swan metaphor). Tagore also emphasized on education - intellectual pursuits and intellectual curiosity (as opposed to rote-learning) ~ 'coz knowledge is likely to be wasted if it exists in a wisdom vacuum.

"One infinite pure and holy - beyond thought beyond qualities I bow down to thee." - Swami Vivekananda. 

"When I read the Bhagavad-Gita and reflect about how God created this universe everything else seems so superfluous." ~ Albert Einstein. 

~ Cannot agree more.

...........................................................

~ Krishn is universal (also refer to the passages on Krishn and Yug Purush/Renaissance Man.) He is Eternal/Shaashvata (Sat/Satya - eternal; also timeless essence/knowledge - para vidya) and exudes grace, wisdom, generosity, work ethic, workmanship, dharmic excellence (right actions for the larger good: loka-kalyana or loka-sangraha), enlightenment and compassion/goodness (Sundar). He is Mahat - the Great One; He is Viraat - the Infinite. He is well-wisher of humanity, and thinks about the welfare, progress and prosperity of all beings throughout the cosmos; He is beyond human pettiness or small-mindedness. [For the Cosmic Entity (Ishvara), as Cakravartin, the goals/objectives, the greater/collective good, the welfare of mankind/humanity and (thus) prioritization is important.] And so, he is compared to the swan. ~ The swan is supposed to possess the ability to separate the water from the cream (in milk) - symbolizing the need to differentiate between positive aspects and negative aspects, the enduring (what is required/necessary or needed) and the ephemeral/transient (or trivial). He is also matsya - the fish; for the betterment of mankind/humanity he will, if need be, swim against the tide; he will, thus, create opportunity and blaze a trail where none exists - for others to follow. ('Toxin' - negativism, including abuse, insults, slights, derision) does not deter him. [He is Ghanshyam - the all-absorbing one.]He possessed the courage of his convictions, and never shirked from standing by his convictions/commitment - the collective goals/objectives: the larger good, the betterment of society. (Also, refer to Nishkama karma and karm-yogi at the end of this post.) ~ Krishn is eternal; he is the Primordial (Aadinath), and therefore, has a wealth of experience, sagacity and wise counsel; he is also very clear-eyed, and hence, prescient; he thus steered the course through tortuous events et al... and put things on firmer ground (upward trajectory). ~ A clear head, sound judgment, plenty of common sense, a pleasant personality, quietly magnificent, indomitable energy, personal magnetism, strategic and far-thinking, gumption and purpose, a quiet determination, magnanimity/generosity of spirit, a long-term vision and abundant patience, steadfastness (to stay the course, and not get demotivated by the magnitude of odds/challenges, or give up - due to slights or lack of instant results), tremendous ingenuity and work ethic, ardent convictions of duty (right, tangible actions, and not merely words or philosophy - for the betterment of society), the fortitude of the hero, with an unflinching courage of those convictions... he was not easily turned aside/away from whatever he undertook... by bigger and mightier obstacles/impediments/odds/challenges (than those of Treta). [Each era/age/yug is distinct; viewing them through the prism of another will be misleading.] ~ His intensity is balanced by his enthusiasm and energy. However, usually appended to the more forceful virtues were gentler ones - humility, affability, approachability, affection and a genuine concern for the welfare of humanity. Krishn, thus, we can say, was striking in appearance and personality/character traits, but without ego (ahamkara) or vainglory.

~ He is the Cosmic Teacher (Palanhare) and Cosmic Ruler (Jagat-patih/Jagadishvar) - rather a male manifestation of Ishvari (~ as indicated by a non-rugged face. The same holds for Shri Ram, Rudra-Siva, etc.) |As the Cosmic Teacher, he puts on a veneer - the avatars never announce themselves; he (also) holds a mirror to humanity. ~ This veneer (probably) helps them to assesses humanity (~ their thought process, comprehension, perspective and cognitive abilities, calibre, mettle, the talent at hand, and so on). Also, whether they can (like the swan) differentiate between positive aspects and negative aspects; between what is necessary/important (enduring) and what is transient (trivial). ~ This is probably integral to his holding a mirror to society ~ to usher in clarity (so as to dispel confusion, apathy, indifference and ignorance). ~ To (thereby) help humanity/society to access itself; to 'awaken', to take cognizance, to shun negativism/pessimism/despondency/narrow parochial thoughts et al; to individually and collectively introspect... and then resort to collective, sustained and tangible actions (karm-yog) - to the best of their abilities; to also reset their inner compass. ~ All this will lead to gradual corrective action/course correction, including attitudinal and mindset change; in other words: towards organic, positive change - upward trajectory/turnaround. | As he says, everything happens due to collective karm-yog (effective, tangible actions - for the betterment of society) or lack of collective, timely and tangible karm-yog; thus, the downward slide (into quagmire) or the gradual degeneration/decay of a society/civilization also comes about due to lack of timely action (i.e. lack of timely, collective, tangible and sustained karm-yog). BG 2.47: || karmaNi eva adhikaaraste maa phaleshu kadaachana, maa karma phala hetuH bhuH maa sanghaH astu akarmaNi || ~ "Thy business is with the action (i.e. timely, tangible, effective and sustained karm-yog) only, never with its fruits (outcome); so let not the fruits of action be thy motive, nor be thou to inaction (apathy, indifference) attached." [In other words: Do your karma (to the best of your ability) and leave the rest to God. Also: Never give up.] ~ Thus, remaining inactive (i.e. collective shirking of responsibility, based on individual responsibility, inclination, nature or traits) or being a fence-sitter or being weak-minded is not advisable. Instead, the focus should be on performing collective, tangible and sustained karm-yog... as best as possible. Perfunctoryness is not a substitute. | [sri-bhagavan uvaca/Sri Bhagavan said (2-2)]: || kutas tva kasmalam idam visame samupasthitam anarya-justam asvargyam akirti-karam arjuna|| ~ "Arjuna! Why are you indulging in such negative thoughts at such a critical time? Such ignoble/un-Aryan (AnArya Justam) behaviour (traits) is unbecoming, it will not gain you entry into higher worlds (Asvargyam = heavenly planets); it will also not allow you to perform your sva-dharma (duties and responsibilities based on his nature, traits, position, etc)." [~ Krishn chides Arjun - for shirking/running away from his true calling as a warrior (in the battle of ideas, principles, inclusivity, progress and vision - for the betterment of society, for the future of humanity).] | ~ It is also an exhortation/advise to all of humanity: to overcome dejection/pessimism etc; to shun cynicism, complacency, procrastination and negative thoughts/negativism - to the best of their ability; to remain cheerful (positive attitude/morale), to cultivate inner fortitude; to not get overwhelmed by negativism and/or lack of quick, instant outcome (to seemingly insurmountable odds), and to remain steadfast in reaching the collective goals/objectives. ~ Frustration or dejection is for the weak-minded, and serves no purpose. | ~ There is no magic wand, no quick-fix, no instant solutions (to overcome challenges/impediments to collective/societal progress and prosperity, especially if these have been left to fester or have come about over a period of time or over several generations; 'coz it then requires attitudinal/mindset changing as well; it is thus work-in-progress); humanity will (therefore) have to sort out their own issues - through collective/cumulative, comprehensive and sustained effort; there is no one "out there" (a messiah figure) who will come and do it. ~ There is no alternative to sustained, collective and tangible karm-yog; mere words is not enough. ~ This has been the message of the Krishn-avatar (the 8thVishnu). And, this has also been the message of the Buddh-avatar (the 9th Vishnu). |Collective karm-yog also provides a national sense of direction, of collective achievement; it helps build character and mettle, otherwise a glorious past is no guarantee for a great future. While in Japan Tagore wrote: "The Japanese do not waste their energy in useless screaming and quarreling, and because there is no waste of energy it is not found wanting when required. This calmness and fortitude of body and mind is part of their national self-realization."| Emulating the Krishn-avatar, etc is futile; as the Cosmic Entity (Ishvara/Ishvari), their purpose is different; humanity needs to (instead) deliberate deeply, understand/comprehend and imbibe the essence of the lessons imparted... and continue to perform their collective karm-yog (as per their dharma).

.........................................................

BG 3.3: (sri-bhagavan uvaca/Sri Bhagavan said): || loke 'smin dvi-vidha nistha pura prokta mayanagha jnana-yogena sankhyanam karma-yogena yoginam || ~ "O noble one [Arjun], in this world a two-fold path has been expounded by Me of old: by the discipline of knowledge (jnana-yogena) for the followers of saNkhya (i.e. gyana-yogi - teachers/academics, preachers, etc), and by the discipline of action (karma-yogena) for the followers of karm-yog (karm-yogi - rulers, reformers, anyone in a decision-making or leadership role.)"

Dharma is (thus) not linear, not straight and narrow; it is not armchair feel-good philosophy or even rhetoric, it is not self-righteousness or abstract moralism or even utopian/impractical idealism; it is not quite ethics or principles by itself - since dharma does not exist in a vacuum/void. It all depends on the motive and objectives - whether sakama karma (selfish action/karm - for narrow parochial gains) or nishkama karma (selfless, non-glory-seeking action/karm - for the larger good, e.g. to build a better and vibrant society). The motives and goals/objectives is important. Dharma is practical application, result-oriented. | Also, each era/age/yug is distinct, their dynamics, odds and challenges differ, even the nature of humanity, their individual and collective worldview, mindset/attitudinal aspects, social conditions, population demographics, comprehension/cognitive abilities, technological aspects, mettle and caliber/competence, and so on does not remain constant; there is a quarterly decline/deterioration, and so, the principles of dharma and karm-yog too does not remain the same. Viewing each era/yug through the prism of another will be, therefore, misleading. 

[~ A Maha-Yug (i.e. four-yug cycle, viz Sat/Satya/Krita Yug, Treta Yug, Dvapar Yug and Kaliyug) follows a ratio of 4:3:2:1, hence Kaliyug is the shortest of all yugs. | Sat/Satya/Krita is the metaphoric 'Golden Age' ofrevival, renaissance, prosperity, progress, and so on; Treta is the metaphoric 'Silver Age'; Dvapar is 'Copper Age'; while the end of Kaliyug is euphemistically known as the 'Dark Age', the 'Metal/Machine Age' or ghor Kaliyug phase or the 'Iron Age' of ignorance/confusion/stagnation/decay. ~ There is a quarterly decline in karm-yog, dharmic principles, mettle, calibre, comprehension/perceptive/cognitive abilities, humanism, worldview, social conditions et al of humanity at the end of each era/yug.The end of Kaliyug is (thus) regarded as the lowest of all phases and the most degenerate of all eras/yugs. ~ The renaissance or revival will (however) not happen by itself; sustained, positive, well-thought-out and tangible actions - individual and collective action/effort - is necessary.]

Thus the duties and responsibilities (dharma) of a ruler (king/emperor/Cakravartin-raja, anyone in a leadership or decision-making role, etc) is not quite the same as that of an academic/teacher or preacher. ~ The essence may remain the same, but the context does not. And so, their karm-yog too is not similar (as per dvi-vidha nistha or two-fold path). Theorizing is different from practical aspects. A ruler, e.g. cannot resort to sermonizing, lecturing, grandstanding, exhortations, etc ~ if faced with governance or administrative issues. Philosophy alone will not suffice. Practical and well thought-out steps/corrective actions/reforms are required to address them. It is, more often than not, a tortuous path/process, also requiring abundant patience and diligence. Even involving mindset, attitudinal change. It is work-in-progress. Postponement, procrastination or ad hoc measures will only aggravate the issues/challenges. [~ Therefore, the endeavour should be to gradually achieve a turnaround, to put things on an upward trajectory, positive organic change. It requires collective and sustained effort.] A ruler needs to (therefore) possess the courage of convictions and follow through with it - to the best of their abilities; and so, they need to prioritize, have a roadmap, be clear-eyed, strategic and far-thinking; possess a long-term vision, and so on; a ruler/leader needs to take cognizance of what is necessary/required/needed to be done (like the swan) - for a better society to emerge, for the larger/collective good (loka-kalyana or loka-sangraha, i.e. "welfare of all" or for the benefit of society). An ideal ruler, if need be, will have to swim against the tide, create opportunity - where none exist. ~ A ruler, or for that matter, anyone in a leadership or decision-making role cannot be daunted by frowns or overwhelmed by smiles. 

Krishn was born under unusual circumstances. He grew up... away from his parental home, was sent away to study at the age of 5 or 7 (at Maharshi Sandeepani and Garga Muni's ashram), and returned only to be instantly drawn into a whirlpool of intrigue (unleashed by the machinations of the tyrannical Jarasandha, Kansh and their allies). [Jain tradition recognizes Krishn as Vasudev and Jarasandh as the prati-Vasudev (possibly: anti-Krishna) - and this shows how important the rivalry between the two was.] |Krishn appeared on the scene with his heroic abilities, superior intellect and tremendous political foresight (when the political situation of the country was most difficult with the likes of Jarasandh and allies holding sway; his background or erudition did not buffer him); however, he, having been thrown into the situation, was quite clear in his objective. |Krishn, as a Purna Avatar (one in whom divinity is manifested fully - a reference to all 16 qualities) is not part of maanav-species; he is also not part of the karmic cycle of samsara - of birth and re-birth. What the avatars do is as per the Cosmic Plan. When avatars arrive, they bring forth or accelerate karmas; they create situations - opportunity - that bring forth both the positive as well as the negative (the swan allegory - ability to separate the milk from the cream in milk); e.g. Krishn brought out both the positive and the negative. [Possibly: to destroy/dispel delusion, illusion, confusion et al; to clear the 'cobwebs', to lift the 'fog' of confusion, delusion, negativism, etc,  to "awaken" humanity ... as well as to hold a mirror to society ~ in order to generate vital force in order to take corrective action, to reform; to urge humanity into introspection ~ so that it leads to a natural process of unraveling (from ignorance to discovery and from reformation to transformation). 

Drifting with the flow or following the herd is easy; to merely express unhappiness or to ascribe fault/blame to others as a matter of routine, to lament, complain or bemoan events/situation/happenings - is no sweat; but to be matsya - the fish; to lead from the front; to, if need be, swim against the tide - for the betterment of mankind/humanity; to hold a mirror to society (toward deep-set and regressive mindset, conditioning, indifference, cavalier attitude et al); to create momentum and opportunity and blaze a trail where none exists - for others to follow; to achieve a positive turnaround or to put things on firmer ground; to reform; to take tangible steps or perform positive actions for mindset and attitudinal change... and to do all of that not from a position of strength + in a spirit of nishkam karma (selfless, non-glory-seeking action) is in a league of its own. To be a trendsetter in a difficult/challenging environment and/or to create opportunity even for others - is a class act. ~ The avatars make seemingly insurmountable odds and challenges seem easy and (thus) capable of being accomplished with little effort; and so, e.g., the Krishn-avatar is called 'Giridhari'- the lifter of mountains.  

To be 'Neelkanth' (the allegorical 'blue-throated one') - to soak up 'toxin'/negativism, slights, barbs, insults et al ~ to 'cleanse', to remove pettiness residing in peoples' hearts and minds - arising out of societal churn/'manthan': to correct the course/achieve a turnaround; to renew/re-energize/rejuvenate; to help mankind/humanity ~ so that human society can function and progress and prosper - only can avatar can do that. ~ Only an avatar can lift humanity (human society/civilization) from zero level or rather sub-zero level; i.e. from the lowest point - from considerable ignorance/stagnation/decay etc (signifying the metaphoric 'quicksand'/'mud'/quagmire)... and put it back on an upward trajectory, on the road to recovery; only an avatar has the capacity/caliber/ability to be that catalyst: to prevent a collapse of basic structure of mankind, to prevent humanity (and/or the planet's) slide into 'quicksand'/quagmire (or to pull it out from one) - to re-energize... to set the ball rolling, so to speak. ~ And, this should help us understand what the Varaha-avatar (the unicorn boar) indicates; this avatar is regarded as the supreme form of Narayana/Narayani/Vishnu/Hari (i.e. the stabilizer/preserver/maintainer aspect of the Cosmic Entity/Primordial). ... Incidentally, the current kalpa is known as "Svhetavaraha Kalpa". (Svheta = white. Varaha = the great boar.)| To not be affected by negativism; to not turn into a negative person; to not become pessimistic or sullen. To be a catalyst for positive change. To remain cheerful, resilient and invigorating... requires equanimity, nerves of steel, long-term vision, statesmanship, political sagacity (astuteness), and plenty of guile and gumption.

~ To steadfastly perform nishkam karm (selfless/non-glory-seeking karm) with inner detachment ~ for a greater cause (e.g. for a better/progressive, prosperous and inclusive society to emerge)... provides the dharmic freedom of inner detachment - symbolized by the lotus in muddy water and the hamsah/swan in water. [Inner detachment/Jeevan Mukt or even equanimity is not to be inferred as robotic or machine-like, but that impediments should not deject or demoralize. It is important to persevere, to remain optimistic and not give up.] |The roots of a lotus are in the mud (muddy water), the stem grows up through the water, and the heavily scented flower lies pristine above the water. ~ The lotus remains Nirmal - pristine, even though rooted in the muddiest waters. ~ While, the swan's feathers do not get damp despite remaining in contact with water. ~ It is the mark of an enlightened, higher soul (mahatmanah). The spirit of such persons is spotless (Nirmal). Therefore, the concept of caraṇa-ambujam/caraṇa-ambhojam or "lotus feet" and kara-puṣkara or "lotus-palm" has come about. |The goals/objectives is important, not the means ~ so long the means (ingenuity, etc) is a step towards the greater cause - the larger/collective good ~ building a better society (i.e. loka-kalyana or loka-sangraha).|The lotus flower and the swan/hamsah are (thus) embodiments of nishkam karm and inner detachment (and the dharmic freedom it bestows) and exemplify a true yogi - a real ascetic (hamsan) or sanyaasi (~ it indicates inner detachment/jeevan mukt - not renunciation). ~ Such a one is a true yogi - a nishkam karm-yogi. Such a yogi is called hamsah - the swan. [Krishn is known as Hamsah - the swan; his was the highest dharmic mission. Humanity was faced with bigger and mightier odds/challenges/impediments in Dvapar than in Treta, but that did not deter him.] (~ Do also read the relevant passages on hamsah - the swan and nishkam karm.)]

BG 4.7: || yada yada hi dharmasya glanir bhavati bharata abhyutthanam adharmasya tadatmanam srjamy aham || ~ "Whenever and wherever there is an alarming decline or discrepancy in dharma/dharmic principles (for the greater good, and/or for humanity/society to progress and prosper/flourish); or when such an alarming decline is perceived or becomes a bane; O Bharata (addressing Arjun, who belonged to the Puru-vansh/Bharat-vansh lineage/clan), only then, I, manifest Myself." ~ Thus, whenever and wherever societal 'churn'/manthan/turmoil becomes too great or difficult (i.e. whenever and wherever there is a great amount of stagnation, degeneration/deterioration) ... so much so that humanity is 'paralyzed'/bewildered and lacks a sense of direction, or is hurtling towards 'quicksand'/quagmire, or when humanity is unable to find a doable/effective solution to their myriad issues (i.e. when the odds/problems/challenges/impediments overtake and loom above the collective ability of humanity to find an effective solution/remedy)... only then, the Cosmic Entity manifests as one or the other major avatar - to stem the 'churn'/manthan, to stabilize (and to re-energize/turnaround). ~ Thus, the Primordial Being is also known as kartaa: The doer, maargah: The path, and neyah: The guide.

Thus, for the 7th Vishnu (the Ram-avatar, Warrior-Prince - warrior against negativism; a karm-yogi and Cakravartin-raja. | Treta - the symbolic 'Silver Age' - since there is a quarterly decline in karm-yog, dharmic principles, mettle, comprehension/perceptive/cognitive abilities, humanism, social conditions, worldview et al of humanity at the end of each era/yug): || vitarasi dikshu rane dik-pati-kamaniyam dasha-mukha-mauli-balim ramaniyam keshava-dhrita-rama-sharira jaya jagadish hare || ~ To destroy the ten-headed ~ an allegory for various elements that were troubling humanity and disturbing peace, including Meghnaad and Vali - both of whom would have posed a massive challenge to humanity, peace, progress and prosperity in the future - on account of their nature and overweening ambition; to destroy dangerous weaponry (including nagpaas- incorrectly translated/understood as "a trap made of a million snakes". Snakes = poisonous. So the nagpaas is very likely an allusion to very potent nerve agents, etc - that could also cause long-term damage - both genetic and environmental); besides gigantic humanoid-robots like "Kumbhakarna" - that carried a variety of hi-tech weaponry); to dismantle the "Shiv-dhanush" or Pinaka - euphemism for the most destructive nuclear weapons (after an all-round agreement/general consensus) ~ to protect the planet and civilizations therein... O Keshavah! O Lord of the universe (Jagadish)! O Lord Hari, who have assumed the form (sharira) of Ramachandra (the Ram-avatar; keshava-dhrita-rama-sharira). | [Hari/Hare = Dispeller [Haran] of Misery/Troubles/Calamity/Sankat - of humanity/human society/civilization.]

For the 8th Vishnu (the Krishn-avatar - Soldier-Statesman; soldier against negativism; a philosopher-mentor + karm-yogi + an epoch-making avatar/Renaissance man/Yug Purush (refer the relevant passages on Yug Purush); Dvarkadheesh, but a Cakravartin by dint of his actions/karm-yog. | Dvapar - the symbolic 'Copper Age'): || vahasi vapushi vishade vasanam jaladabham hala-hati-bhiti-milita-yamunabham keshava dhrita-haladhara-rupa jaya jagadish hare || ~ O You who dispel misery and vanquish the arrogance of the wicked (~ a reference to Duryodhan, Shakuni, Dushshana, Karna, Jarasandh, Kansh, etc, their allies + their collective machinations). O Keshavah! O Lord of the universe! O Lord Hari. | [~ Hari/Hare = Dispeller (Haran) of Misery/Troubles/Calamity/Sankat - of humanity/human society/civilization.] The Krishn-avatar brought about a complete change of course and lay the foundation for a new and better society to emerge. (keshava dhrita-haladhara-rupa jaya jagadish hare.) |~ The Mahabharata ('The Great History of the Bharatas') was a dharma-yuddha - battle of ideas, principles, inclusivity, progress and vision - for the future of humanity/human society; for a better society to emerge, for a constructive 'way of life'. | For a ruler or leader (i.e. anyone in a leadership or decision-making role), dharma (duties and responsibilities) does not mean utopian moralism, self-righteousness or unrealistic/impractical idealism, and so on. ~ It is about what should prevail? What should happen to humanity and human society? (for Krishn, it was about Dvapar and beyond). ~ Downward spiral or an upward movement? ~ E.g., if Jarasandh (and his allies) or Duryodhan and Shakuni (and their allies) were to prevail - what would have been the outcome? What turn would the Mahabharata (~ and by extension, human society of Dvapar and beyond) have taken?~ Therefore, Krishn's was the highest dharmic mission: to stem the downward slide, to steady the churn/manthan; to stabilize, to preserve (i.e. prevent a collapse of basic structure of mankind); to dispel the misery/sankat/calamity confronting the people, and to re-energize/revive i.e. put things on firmer ground/upward trajectory. ~ As the Jagat-patih, Sovereign of the Universe/Lord of Creation, he upheld Raj-dharma (~ the duties and responsibilities of a sovereign; as Dvarkadheesh too he upheld Raj-dharma; he protected humanity and put things on firmer ground – upward trajectory; he was the catalyst for a better society to emerge, instead of sliding deeper into quagmire. He stemmed/mitigated the long-term damage.) He also rid the planet of extremely destructive weaponry and unnatural humans (highly evolved humanoids - genetically engineered and cloned) ~ to allow the planet, humanity and human civilization to "heal"... so as to progress naturally and peacefully.

vahasi vapushi vishade vasanam jaladabham: Krishn is fair-complexioned; probably reddish-hued or crimson (Lohith/Rohitah or Rohit). |vasanam jaladabham: Your attire is the colour of a fresh blue rain cloud. ~ This is allegorical. ... Wherever there is the convergence of purity (i.e. Sat-cit-ānanda or the eternal bliss/spiritual ecstasy of self-realization, and non-glory-seeking karm) and depth (boundlessness) ~ it produces the colour blue. Meghavarnam. The water of the seas and the sky - both are blue-hued. ~ And, since the Almighty combines both purity and depth or boundlessness, S/He too is (allegorically) 'blue-hued'. (~ It's a concept - to indicate divine attribute/divinity.) |Blue also stands for: meditation/introspection, peace, tranquility, depth, stability, trust, loyalty, wisdom, confidence, intelligence, patience, decision-making and dharma (right, tangible actions for the greater good.) 

[Both Ram and Krishn are described as tall, handsome and with eyes shaped like lotus petals (maybe, big-eyed). | For Krishn: coral lips (maybe reddish or the colour of red-coral); head bedecked with peacock feathers (that would very likely be the headgear or crown); a fascinating face; an enthralling/captivating smile. ~ His features probably were a result of the delicate blending of the martian, saturnine, venusian and lunar characteristics. In other words: due to the dominance of the influences of the Moon and Venus, with Saturn and Mars]. 

For the 9th Vishnu (the Buddh-avatar, Sage-Prince - a teacher-philosopher;gyana-yogi): || nindasi jajna-vidher ahaha shruti-jatam sadaya-hridaya darshita-pashu-ghatam keshava dhrita-buddha-sharira jaya jagadish hare || ~ O Buddha (the Enlightened One), of compassionate heart, You show compassion to all living entities; You preach the doctrine of peace, co-existence, non-violence (ahimsa) and universal brotherhood. O Keshavah! O Lord of the universe (Jagadish)! O Lord Hari, who have assumed the form of Buddha (the Buddh-avatar; keshava dhrita-buddha-sharira).

For the 10th Vishnu (the Kalkiḥ-avatar or Kalkiḥ Maitreya; a karm-yogi + Maitreya Buddha + an epoch-making avatar/Renaissance Man (Yug Purush) + Knight-saviour ~ 'coz the changeover from one era/yug to another, including one maha-yug to another, becomes possible by the coming of an avatar of an era/yug - a yugavatara. | The end of Kaliyug (ghor Kaliyug phase) is the symbolic Dark Age - the Age of Machines or Metal/'Iron Age' of ignorance/confusion/stagnation/decay - since dharmic principles, values, ethics and karm-yog will fall below the minimum level; humanism + comprehension/perceptive/perspective/cognitive abilities, mettle et al of humanity too will fall below the minimum level... this will impact their worldview, social conditions et al ~ thus, humanity will become symbolic machines/robots). The end of Kaliyug is thus the lowest point: ||mleccha-nivaha-nidhane kalayasi karavalam dhumaketum iva kim api karalam keshava dhrita-kalki-sharira jaya jagadish hare || ~ This avatar will be indescribable (kim api). To "close" the 'Dark Age' -the ghor Kaliyug phase or the Metal/Machine Age - 'Iron Age' of ignorance/confusion/stagnation/decay, the Kalkiḥ-avatar appears like a comet (dhumaketum iva), holding a sword of light - the (metaphoric) brilliant/effulgent sword (known as "Ratna Maru") - it is the (symbolic) "sword" of destiny, of hope and opportunity: signifying knowledge, discernment and wisdom - to guide humanity through the 'fog' of confusion, ignorance, apathy/indifference, ennui, stagnation, degeneration, decay, etc (at the end of Kaliyug, euphemistically known as the ghor Kaliyug phaseor the 'Iron Age' of ignorance/confusion/stagnation/decay. This phase is therefore also known as the most degenerate of all yugs/ages). This avatar's 'vehicle' is the white winged horse/flying horse (Devadutta). O Keshavah! O Lord of the universe (Jagadish)! O Lord Hari, who have assumed the form of Kalkiḥ(the Kalkiḥ-avatar; keshava dhrita-kalki-sharira). |The Kalkiḥ-avatar is predicted to be an erudite, intelligent and valiant (shaurya) personage who will possess Sattva Guna-s (noble traits/qualities). This avatar will (thus) be a cogent, sagacious, clear-sighted and far-sighted avatar, characterized by steady, earnest and energetic effort ~ someone with dhrti (courage of the mind - resilient, steadfast, patient and displaying fortitude and endurance). [Valour/Shauryais a special human quality, usually demonstrated in the performance of extraordinary and unselfish deeds (nishkam karm) in the face of great challenges - for the greater/collective good.] Parasurama (the 6th avatar of the Dasavatara) will be the martial guru of the Kalkiḥ-avatar.| ~ This avatar is not quite the "Apocalyptic Horse Rider", but a pathfinder and preserver/stabilizer: to prevent turmoil/Pralaya (on earth); and to bring about the transition from the end of Kaliyug to Sat/Satya/Krita Yug of the next Maha-yug. This avatar will probably also set the stage for the Sat/Satya/Krita Yug (the metaphoric 'Golden Age' - the age of gradual rejuvenation, renaissance, prosperity and progress) of the next Maha-Yug to manifest. This avatar will very likely also be the avatar of the next Sat/Satya/Krita Yug. |Kalkiḥ, also referred to as Kalkin and Kalaki, is often a metaphor for "Eternity" or "Time". (Time is Kaalah in Sanskrit.) ~ Another etymology (for "Kalkiḥ") from Sanskrit is 'white horse'; maybe indicative of equine features.]

From what we can gather, Yajña, better known as Svayambhuva Manu (the first "Manu") - performed tapasya at Naimisa on the banks of the Gomati river - for acquiring the privilege of having Lord Narayan/Narayani (the Cosmic Entity) as his offspring in three different lifetimes. |Yajña or Svayambhuva Manu - who (earlier) appeared as Raja Dasarath (Lord Ram's father - in Treta) and as Vasudev (Lord Krshn's father - in Dvapar) is predicted to finally appear as Vishnuyash/Vishnuyashas/Vishnuyash Sharma (Lord Kalkiḥ's father - at yuga-sandhyāyām/at the conjunction/cusp of two yugs [Kaliyug and Sat/Satya/Krita Yug of the next cycle; sandhyāyām = evening, twilight, cusp]). || bhavane vishnuyashasah kalkih pradurbhavishyati || ~ Lord Kalki will appear (prādúr) in the home (bhavanê) of Vishnuyasha in the future (bhavishyati). And be born to Vishnuyasha (janitā viṣṇu-yaśaso). || namna kalkir jagat-patih || ~ The appearance (of the Lord of Creation/Sovereign of the Universe) would be during: athāsau yuga-sandhyāyām: at the conjunction/cusp of two yugs (Kaliyug and Sat/Satya/Krita Yug of the next cycle/maha-yug; sandhyāyām = evening, twilight, dusk, cusp.) ~ At this time the 'Iron Age' of ignorance/confusion/stagnation/decay - i.e. the negative aspects of Kaliyug (ghor Kaliyug phase) will be at its peak. | Now, Vishnuyash/Vishnuyashas could be a name per se, or it could be an allegorical name; it could also mean: devotee of Lord Narayan (i.e. the stabilizer/preserver/maintainer aspect of the Cosmic Entity). Vishnuyash is described as Brahmanasya, i.e. he will be a Brahmana, implying erudition; he will also be the head of Shambhala village: shambhala-grama-mukhyasya.) |Alternatively:shambhala-grama-mukhyasya brahmanasya mahatmanah could be a reference to Lord Kalkiḥ. shambhala-grama-mukhyasyacould imply Shambhu Nath (the Ruler/Guardian [Nath] of Shambhala). Brahmanasya implies erudition. Mahatmanah implies higher soul.

Shambhala is a mystical kingdom that guards the most sacred spiritual teachings of the world, including the Kalachakra ('Wheel of Time'), the pinnacle of Buddhist wisdom. Perhaps, Shambhala is synonymous with Shangri-la; or, maybe, the lost kingdom of Shangri-La was inspired by the legend of Shambala. Shambhala (ruled over by Lord Maitreya/Buddha Maitreya/Maitreya Buddha) is also mentioned in various ancient texts, including the Kalachakra Tantra + other texts that predate Tibetan Buddhism in western Tibet. |Another meaning of Shambhala: "Bhal" refers to the forehead. Therefore, Shambhala can also mean: "Born of the Forehead" or "Place of the Forehead" ~ indicating "destiny". | Shambhala is the land of great Rishi-s. Guru Nanakdev-ji called it Sach Khand. It is our past - our future - yet exists in our present. It is the 'land of bliss' (eternal bliss/spiritual ecstasy of self-realization ~ Sat-cit-ānanda) of the earliest Vedic times. It is also called "Aryavarsha" (abode of the Arya people; the Land of the Noble Ones) ~ the land from which the Vedas (Book of Knowledge or Book of Enlightenment; Veda comes from the root 'Vid' which means, "to know") came from. Here is Tagore's 'Anandaloke Mangal-aloke': link.

The Kalkiḥ-avatar is synonymous with the Krishn-avatar. Maybe that's why this avatar is regarded as the second coming of Krishna. [The Krishn-avatar is depicted with an allegorical golden disc/chakra ~ indicative of the 6th chakra (Ajna Chakra or Brow Chakra, the symbolic third-eye-chakra; possibly the allegoric third eye of Shiva), while the 7th Chakra (the Sahasrara Chakra, the highest chakra) is associated with the Kalkiḥ-avatar, indicative of kundalini-power (symbolized by brilliant white). [And this should help us understand what Durga Kshama Shiva dhatri means. Kshama = magnanimity, high-mindedness, nobility of spirit: the ability to rise above selfish considerations. Dhatri = mother.] The combination of the 6th and 7th chakras is 'Sudarshan Chakra' - possibly depicted by the syncretic form of Rudra/Shiva-Shakti.] ~ Thus, the Kalkiḥ-avataris regarded as Krishna+ (refer the relevant passages on kundalini, sahasrara chakra, ajna chakra, etc).] |BG 10.24: || purodhasam ca mukhyam mam viddhi paartha brihaspatim senaninam aham skandah sarasam asmi sagarah || ~ "Of preceptors, O Arjun, know Me to be the chief, Brihaspati. Of leaders I am Skandah, and of bodies of water I am the ocean." ~ Skandah is also known as Devasenapati - leader of the positive forces - the Virupakshas. [Deva = positive entities/forces.] Virupaksha = oblique eyes; Rudraksha (eye of Rudra) and Virupaksha is one and the same. Goddess Parvati - the transcendental form/leela-avatar of the Cosmic Entity (Goddess Adi Shakti) is Rudra-Siva Herself. She is Kailashpati. She is thus Shambhu Nath (the Ruler/Guardian (Nath) of Shambhala. So, Skandah probably was an able leader of the Virupakshas. Skandah and Gauri-tanaya Kartik are taken as one and the same. But then, Skandah is also known as Kartikeya meaning 'of Kartik'. Therefore, in all likelihood, Shanda is Kartik's son. [Probably Kartik and Kartikeya have caused some confusion. Kartik is most closely associated with the lance - given to him by his mother, goddess Parvati.]

(Refer to the earlier part of the above paragraph). However, given that the conditions at the end of Kaliyug will be considerably different from those that prevailed at the end of Dvapar ~ we can expect a mix of Krishn and Chanakya. Keeping the larger/collective/national goals/objectives above him, Chanakya (also known as Kautilya - for his guileand wiles) did not seek power for the sake of power; instead, he maneuvered and out-maneuvered (not to be misconstrued as manipulation, that is indicative of selfish motives), in a series of masterful strokes ~ eschewing myopia/short-term considerations. Instead, he thought of the future, of future generations. He was a problem-solver - a do-er with a rare clarity of purpose, vision and sense of mission, and not merely a talker or idealistic dreamer. His clear-eyed and dispassionate/objective nature (coupled with monk-like self-discipline and focus) probably helped him to take prudent and well-thought-out decisions - that in turn helped him to bring together various regions/nations/cultures/peoples; this temperament also stood him in good stead as an able administrator. Chanakya thus was not the one to squander momentum or to let go of strategic opportunities, indigenous or otherwise. [He wouldn't be Chanakya then.] ~ It is unlikely though that he would have actually advised the state to create issues in order to keep a handle on the people; simply because such a route is self-defeating/counterproductive/detrimental in the mid to long-run; issues never remain constant/unchanged, besides creating diverse mindset as a corollary; issues are an ever-growing list that tends to prolong, meander, get complicated and fester... ultimately weaving their way into the national fabric, thereby impacting and stymieing the stability, prosperity and progress of a nation. [Krishna's kaliya-mardan is an imagery to perhaps convey this aspect.] Chanakya and his doctrine is misunderstood (~ probably lost in translation and editing.) ~ Maybe he referred to the prevailing era and/or gave his views/insights (as a cautionary note) regarding how the end of Kaliyug (the ghor Kaliyug phase) could turn out to be (in the absence of a common or collective roadmap/architecture/framework and Cakravartin, that is). Sharp, alert and possessing plenty of common sense and pithy, unflowery wisdom, he perhaps foresaw it all. ~ Chanakya was a fine statesman, a political scientist and a nation-builder, besides being a very able administrator; he eschewed parochialism, unrealistic/armchair worldview, textbook knowledge/wisdom et al, and clearly understood what needed to be done. Pragmatism and realism coupled with geo-political savvy, drive and far-sightedness helped him to beclear about the priorities; he was also strategic in his outlook (long-term thinking). His reading of events and regional dynamics was thus prescient. Fearless in his choices, meticulous in his preparation (planning - plan of action, strategizing, negotiating, networking, alliance-building... the works), he was not confused or indecisive, nor possessed a unifocal view; he did not choose to look the other way, he did not choose utopian idealism, self-preservation or verbosity - to merely crib and carp/complain and do nothing. Instead, he took the initiative; he chose nishkama karm-yog - the doctrine of action (for a karm-yogi): selfless, positive, tangible and sustained action. Thus, his too was the highest dharmic mission. Else, ancient India would have been trampled + washed away by various torrent (of troubles/calamities) and myriad internal rot. Self-made and selfless, he was an extraordinary figure/personage for/at an extraordinary time/turn of our history. He was the Renaissance man - Yug Purush (refer the relevant passages on Yug Purush). The decadent, venal, vainglorious and tyrannical (allegorical Magadhan python) Dhana Nanda (and his allies) held sway, and later the devastating (allegorical Macedonian python) Alexander was at the gates. ~ Even a semblance of values and ethics (and karm-yog) had taken a backseat... deception, parochialism and survival of the fittest had become order of the day; there was lack of cohesion, distopianism reigned - culminating in a greatly diminished quality of life or degradation of values, including shared values; crumbling of the basic fabric of society and symbolized values ~ resulting in selfishness, gloom and distrust - lack of an underlying feeling of faith and warmth amongst the common people, society was divisive and sort of dysfunctional, people lived in apprehension; humanity was in shambles; might was right; there was sheep in lion's clothing, none realized the gravity of the situation and spirituality was being sold for a price. ... At such a time and scenario - to salvage the situation, to uplift society back on firmer ground, to achieve a turnaround ~ is a gigantic task. It was only with a firm resolve (born out of his long-term vision + the unshakable courage of his convictions) that Chanakya handled the spiraling situation. Steadily navigating through choppy waters and a myriad of tortuous events, relying only on his quiet confidence, intelligence, sagacity and willpower, he united/galvanized a fractured/fractious nation and lay the foundation of a glorious era - that was marked by all-round progress, from the arts to the sciences, literature and innovation as well as trade and other economic activity; as a result ancient India developed from within and evolved into a preeminent nation that shared a multidimensional relationship with other nations. Chanakya did not possess the charm of Krishn; it was his innate ability and extraordinary brilliance that helped him tackle the difficult and myriad situations and challenges. He was valiant (shaurya) - a true braveheart. What he accomplished was phenomenal. He possessed the courage of the mind to make things happen + the mettle of grit and fortitude (inner strength, the strength of his karma) and was clear-eyed enough to recognize the enduring (what was required/needed/necessary, i.e. what had to be done) and what was transient (trivial). Born a commoner but exhibiting the power of an enlightened one - the knower of the Bhagavad-Gita, he achieved the unachievable ~ given the circumstances and given the magnitude of odds and challenges. ... To work out an amicable solution when all seems haywire/precarious - it is only the power of Chanakya that can pin pointedly give an effective solution. As per the Bhagavad-Gita ~ the 10th and final avatar of Lord Vishnu (i.e. the stabilizer/preserver/maintainer aspect of the Cosmic Entity) - Bhagavan Kalkiḥ - would be almost like a one-man army (possibly, a Krishn-Chanakya-esque knight-saviour + Renaissance man/Yug Purush, not one-person show). ~ For one who does not fear death... taking control of happenings would be easier - to prevent turmoil/Pralaya on earth + to put things on firmer ground/achieve a turnaround or positive change of course, instead of being pushed deeper into quagmire. [Note: History is not boring, the teacher is. And, if humanity does not learn from history, it tends to repeat itself.] 

[To comprehend rare personages like Krishn and Chanakya - Yug Purush - one needs to really think big. ~ Trying to forcefit them into narrow viewpoints, parochilism, perfunctoryness, indifference, small worldview et al will be misleading. Being trapped within one's own head - courtesy ego, vainglory, etc will cloud the mind and intellect. Greatness or mettle cannot be acquired, just as respect cannot be demanded. ~ Swami Vivekananda, Tagore and Einstein were great - not merely due to their achievements, but 'coz they did not try to imagine themselves as Krishn. They were under no illusions regarding their stature and contributions. ~ 'Coz such personages (Krishn and Chanakya) are epoch-making. ~ Once we are able to comprehend the magnitude of their karm, contribution and purpose, besides the momentum and opportunity they create - when none exist - we can then (perhaps) understand what dharma and karm-yog is all about, what the swan analogy means, and what a nishkama karm-yogi is really like. ~ To answer the call of duty despite spiraling challenges ~ is a test of mettle and calibre. Leadership cannot be acquired. Character cannot be acquired. A change of circumstances will not repair character flaws/weaknesses/deficiencies. Nishkam karm-yog is about shunning bluster, finger-pointing, shortcut-ism/ad hoc-ism, and selfish motives. It is about embracing toil wholeheartedly, about giving one's all - blood, sweat and tears - for a greater cause, for the long-term, for the future - to change well-entrenched mindset, to reform, to bring about an organic cultural shift - to build a better, prosperous, progressive and vibrant society and nation (~ not to be misconstrued as nationalism, though). It is result-oriented action - for the larger/collective good. One has to also be prepared for the myriad barbs, slights, bile, insults and so forth - if one decides to be matsya - the fish - and swim against the tide/flow. Thus the allegories of Neelkanth (the 'blue-throated one') and Ghanshyam (the all-absorbing one). ~ Nishkam karm-yogis are Neelkanth-s - they are not deterred or daunted by frowns and taunts; they not only say/speak but also perform actions that are ground-breaking/pioneering and far-reaching in nature. They, thus, blaze a trail for others to follow. They make it easier for others, while soaking up the barbs, slights and negativism themselves. This helps to 'cleanse' and thus contributes toward a positive/constructive culture shift. They also possess enough guiles and wiles (not to be misconstrued for 'stooping to conquer') - to bring forth the 'amrit' (positive aspects) from amidst a cacophony or cloud of negativism. ~ Only avatars possess this kind of ardent convictions of duty and the unflinching courage of convictions, ingenuity (imagination) and work ethic - to steer the course through tortuous events and choppy waters... to put things on the road to recovery. They thus teach through their own behaviour/actions and lead from the front. They inspire. They are inspirational figures. Eternally.]

There is also a strong possibility that Chanakya infiltrated Alexander's army by getting Chandragupta recruited into it. The latter's humble origins made no difference to the great Master. |Chanakya was a Brahmana, implying erudition.  [~ A "Brahmana" was someone who trod in the path of knowledge.] | He is also addressed by two honorifics: Pandit and Acharya. ~ "Pandit" indicates a wise, learned and enlightened person. "Acharya" means: "He who instructs through his own behavior (acharan)". That is the mark of a true teacher/guru. | One can only marvel at how a brilliant and intrepid young man - with unmatched resiliency, vulcanized via the most trying of circumstances, and who went to Takshashila at the age of sixteen, but had no practical experience whatsoever in the treacherous world of kutniti and politics was (gradually) able to outmaneuver an assortment of experienced and powerful (albeit negative) entities - and that too from a position of weakness + checkmated the rampaging Macedonians - to unite a fractured nation and lay the foundations of a glorious era. ~ He was thus a Renaissance Man, a Yug Purush; he turned the wheel - despite all odds. | His life is a lesson in equanimity; he did not let difficult circumstances/situations/events + an assortment of challenges and impediments deject or demoralize him. Instead, he persevered. He never lost sight of the larger cause - the goals/objective. He never gave up.He was a finisher, he took all that he set out to do across the finish line.| Chanakya is unlike the robotic, unethical entity that he has been made out to be. Though he taught politics and economics at Takshashila, he was essentially a karm-yogi, not a gyan-yogi (refer Krishn's two-fold path or dvi-vidha nistha). Also, his motive, purpose, goals/objective were not selfish. ~ Amatya Rakshasa was the venal and tyrannical Dhana Nanda's trusted aide and minister (amatya)... and did all he could - to humiliate and destroy Chanakya. ... And yet, when the time came the latter was able to look through all that and hand over the baton to the former. Chanakya not only cleverly brought Amatya Rakshasa (real name: Kartikeya) back, but also publicly de-demonized him. ~ A shallow person with a petty mind could not have done this. Thus Chanakya did possess a great deal of character depth. [~ Both Krishn and Chanakya were bathed in real-life struggle, but neither was given to vainglorious behaviour, they did not beat their own drums. | Chanakya is also associated with what can be called the 'porridge-bowl theory' ~ something he imbibed from an unlettered village woman. ... That when handed a piping-hot bowl of porridge, one must not attempt to eat from the middle. Eating from the sides is advisable. ~ This is pithy wisdom. And one is struck by its similarity with Krishn's advise. ~ BG 2.47: || karmaṇy evādhikāras te mā phaleṣu kadācana mā karma-phala-hetur bhūrmā te sańgo 'stv akarmaṇi|| ~ Do your duty (i.e. imbibe the spirit of dharma - positive/constructive, tangible action for the greater good + individual and collective/cumulative/concerted karm-yog) to the best of your ability. Overcome your limitations. Concentrate on your convergences. Do not highlight your divergences. Shun lethargy. Overcome inertia. Be positive. Never lose hope.]

~ Glimpses of all the major avatars probably can be seen in the Kalkiḥ-avatar. [A merging of various avatars into one form/manifestation - the Universal Form.] 'Coz they are non-different from the Cosmic Entity/Primordial Being. And, given that the 10th Vishnuis a 'Sampoorna Avatar' ~ a total, complete, all-encompassing avatar, it is quite possible that this avatar could also be (e.g.) Lord Maitreya Buddha, Saoshyant of the Zoroastrians, the second coming of Christ, and so on. ~ Kalkiḥ Maitreyaand Maitreya Buddha(the next Buddha-to-be after Gautama Buddha/Sakyamuni Buddha), share a Shambhala connection - both are said to be the ruler/king of the fabled Buddhist land or mythical kingdom of Shambhala. |Shambhala is a Sanskrit word that to the Tibetans means "the source of happiness". |Shambhala = Shambhu (Shiv) + Le (of). [So, Shambhala could very well be Kailash.] Therefore, the Kalkiḥ-avatar or Kalkiḥ Maitreya could also be Shambhu Nath - possibly a title or honorific, indicative of the Ruler (Nath) and Guardian/Protector of Shambhala. [BG 10.23: || rudranam sankaras casmi || ~ "Of all the Rudras I am Sankara" (Rudra-Siva).] ~ Shambhala is also considered to be the real Haridvar. Some believe it to be the actual Manas Sarovara, Prayag, Kailash and Rishikesh or 'Agni Tirtha'. It is a land of immortals. ~ Probably all of these have contributed towards Shambhala being regarded as the world's spiritual powerhouse.|The Hindu and Buddhist alike regard Mt Meru (the central 'mountain' of the world) as the location of the fabled Buddhist land or mythical kingdom of Shambhala. [Mt Meru: is taken as the true centre of the planet and the world's spiritual powerhouse; it is the heartbeat of whole universe, the base of spiritual consciousness, heart of divinity; it is the center of the cosmos. Its summit is believed to align to the wheeling constellation of Ursa Major, the Seven Stars that circle the Pole (Dhruva Loka?)] |BG 10.23: || meruh sikharinam aham || ~ "and of mountains I am Meru." ~ Mt. Meru is very likely an allegorical mountain. The Dasavatara depicts Lord Vishnu (i.e. the stabilizing/preserving/maintainer aspectof the Cosmic Entity/Primordial Being) as supporting Mt. Meru on His back ~ as the Kurma Avatar. | The Śrīvatsa mark on Lord Vishnu's chest, symbolizes His 'consort' Sri Sri Lakshmi Devi as well as His eternal aspect. Vishnu is thus Srivatsankita, the one who bears the sign of Srivatsa.[It is said that the 10th and final Maha Avatar of Lord Vishnu (i.e. the preserver/stabilizer/maintainer aspect of the Primordial Being), the Kalkiḥ-avatar, will be the bearer of the Srivatsa mark. SrivatsavakshaaH is another name of Lord Vishnu ~ the preserver/stabilizer/maintainer aspect of the Primordial Being. ~ Srivatsa is an ancient auspicious symbol in India. The Śrīvatsa mark also adorns the images of the Jain Tirthankaras and of the Buddha.)]

Sri Sri Lakshmi Devi  as the 'consort'of Lord Vishnu i.e. the preserver/stabilizer/maintainer aspect of the Primordial Being ~ may not be literal. It could be indicative of the energy aspect of the preserver/stabilizer/maintainer aspect of the Primordial Being. [Therefore, both the aspects - known as Vishnu and Lakshmi respectively - is Ishvari/Devi Shakti Herself. ~ Our ancients probably assigned different names and nomenclatures to different aspects, energies, and so on - to be able to distinguish between them ~ later these may have been taken literally. ... Thus, Srsstti-Sthiti-Vinaashaanaam: the Power of Creation, Maintenance/Preservation and Dissolution, denoted by the names Brahma-Vishnu-Shivah/Rudra have come to be regarded as three different entities, instead. ~ Though they are all one and the same - three different aspects of Ishvari/Devi Shakti/Adi Shakti - the Cosmic Entity/Primordial Being. | The Lakshmi who is Devi Parvati's daughter is thus a namesake. ~ Perhaps similarity in names have caused later translators to merge the respective narratives.]

~ (Refer the previous paragraph.) |Even our raags or ragas were classified as 'husband', 'wife' and even 'son'. Rāginī is a term for the "feminine" counterpart or "wife" to a rāga. The rāga-rāgini scheme from about the 14th century aligned 6 "male" rāgas with 6 "wives" (rāginis) and a number of sons (putras) and even 'daughters-in-law'. ~ So, taking it literally could be misleading. |The holiest of our raags is Shree Bhairavi ~ named after Shakti; hence Bhairavi is respectfully addressed as Shree Bhairavi. Bhairavi makes use of all the komal swars, Rishabh, Gandhar, Dhaivat, Nishad... and lends itself well to brisk, taut bandishes. Bhairavi is performed early in the morning, and is a powerful raag filled with devotion and compassion. Here is Sharada Maa Bhajan (dedicated to DeviSarasvati) by Pt. Bhimsen Joshi: link. Bhairavi's looming presence in the Indian musical mind is in no small measure on account of it's close association with this great land's spiritual repertoire. No bhajani baithak can be complete without a generous dose of Bhairavi. | The corresponding raga of Shree Bhairavi is the raga Bhairava (a sampoorn raag). Kālabhairava Aṣṭamī (or Kālabhairava Jayanti) falls on Kṛṣṇa Pakṣa Aṣṭamī of the month of Mārgaśīrṣa (also spelled Mṛgaśira/Mrigashīrsha ~ November-December. |BG 10.35: || māsānāḿ mārga-śīrṣo 'ham || ~ "Of months I am Mārgaśīrṣa" [November-December] |Mrigashīrsha - the 5th nakṣatra or lunar mansion - as used in Vedic astronomy and astrology, is the constellation Orion, also known as Kaalpurush, meaning: Timeless, Eternal or Ancient. | Kāla = time; Bhairava = the Primordial Sound, the Shabda Brahmn - pranavah/Omkara/pranava naad, the sound of the universe itself; OM or AUM - is very auspicious. | Bhairava-Bhairavi represent the concept of ArdhaNarishvari.) In old treatises Bhairava is referred to as the adi-raga and comes attached with a wealth of lore. Bhairava is so fundamental to Indian tradition that its impaction on the nation's musical soul can never be overstated.  | Bhairava and Bhairavi are one and the same ~ two different aspects of Shakti [Primal Cosmic Energy/Cosmic Entity/Ishvari] - as per the ArdhaNarishvari concept.

Here are a few stotra from the Devi Mahatmyam ('The Magnanimity of the Goddess'/ also known as the Sri Sri chandipATh): 

|| Yaa Devii Sarva-Bhutessu Vissnnumaayeti Shabditaa |
Namas-Tasyai Namas-Tasyai Namas-Tasyai Namo Namah ||6||


6.1:To that Devi Who in All Beings is Called Vishnumaya,
6.2:Salutations to Her, Salutations to Her, Salutations to Her, Salutationsagain and again.

Thus, the Vishnu aspect, i.e. the preserver/stabilizer/maintainer aspect of the Cosmic Entity/Primordial Being ~ is very likely an aspect of the latter's divine powers (Yogmaya). [Note: Sri is a respectful honorific. For female deities this honorific is used twice.]

|| Yaa Devii Sarva-Bhutessu Lakssmii-Ruupenna Samsthitaa |
Namas-Tasyai Namas-Tasyai Namas-Tasyai Namo Namah ||20||


20.1:To that Devi Who in All Beings is Abiding in the Form of Good Fortune (lakssmii), 
20.2:Salutations to Her, Salutations to Her, Salutations to Her, Salutations again and again.

Thus, Lakshmi is very likely an aspect of Devi [Shakti/Narayani/Adi Shakti]. ~ Therefore, Devi Parvati's daughter is a namesake (similarity in name have resulted in the confluence of narrative.)

.......................................................

Here is another shloka from Devi Mahatmyam:

|| Sarva-Manggala-Maanggalye Shive Sarvaartha-Saadhike |
Sharannye Trya[i-A]mbake Gauri Naaraayanni Namo[ah-A]stu Te ||

1: (Salutations to You O Narayani) Who is the Auspiciousness in All the Auspicious, Auspiciousness Herself and Complete with All the Auspicious Attributes, 
2:The Giver of Refuge (Sharannye), With Three Eyes (implying Trikalagya - the Master of all things that exist in the past, future, and present) and a Shining Complexion (Gauri); Salutations to You O Narayani

Here are a few more stotra from the Devi Mahatmyam ('The Magnanimity of the Goddess'/ also known as the Sri Sri chandipATh):  

|| Srsstti-Sthiti-Vinaashaanaam Shakti-Bhuute Sanaatani | 
Gunna-[A]ashraye Gunnamaye Naaraayanni Namo[ah-A]stu Te ||9|| 

9.1: (Salutations to You O Narayani) In Whom is Present the Power of Creation, Maintenance/Preservationand Dissolution(Brahma-Vishnu-Shivah/Rudra) and Who is Eternal
9.2: Who is the Support of the Gunas (all noble aspects, attributes) and the Embodiment of the Gunas; Salutations to You O Narayani

[Note:Srsstti-Sthiti-Vinaashaanaam: the Power of Creation, Maintenance/Preservation and Dissolution (distinguished by the names: Brahma-Vishnu-Shivah/Rudra). |Keshavah - one who is the three: kah Brahma, ah Vishnu and Isa Shiva ~ indicating the power of Creation, Maintenance/Preservationand Dissolution (i.e. the three aspects of the Cosmic Entity/Primordial Being).]

And therefore, Narayani, as Brahma (the Creator aspect) has created fourteen planetary systems; Narayani sustains, maintains and preserves the universe as Vishnu (the Stabilizer/Preserver/Maintainer aspect) and dissolves the universe at the end of maha-kalpa as Shiva or Rudra. ~ Thus the holy Trimurti is non-different from Narayani.|Narayani is the name of Ishvari/Cosmic Entity/Primordial Being ~ in the infinite, all pervading form. Narayani also means: Enlightened Supreme/Primordial Being. Also: well-wisher and refuge of all beings. 'Coz Ishvari does not discriminate ~ as indicated by the Universal Form of the Primordial.] 

The avatars can be male or female. ~ And this should perhaps explain the Cosmic Duality - the concept of ArdhaNarishvari - its essence, that is. ~ It should (perhaps) also explain as to why the Krishn-avatar or even the Vishnu aspect (i.e. the Stabilizer/Preserver/Maintainer aspect of the Cosmic Entity/Primordial Being) - is depicted the way they are depicted. ~ It is the Cosmic Entity/Primordial Being (Ishvari) as those avatars or aspects.And thus: || Tvameva Mata cha Pita Tvameva |TvamevaBandhu cha SakhaTvameva || ~ You are the Mother, And you are the Father, You are the Relative (with Whom we are eternally related as Jiva-atma (Soul-self or mere Self) with Param-atma (the Supreme Self/Higher Self or Supersoul), true Friend, Support, eternal Companion and dearest Confidant.  [Soul/spirit is energy; it has no form or gender.]

|| Ekam Sat Vipraha Bahudha Vadanti || ~ Truth (the Eternal/Shaashvata or Sat/Satya; also, timeless essence/knowledge - para vidya) is one, but the wise know/call it as many. | In other words: God is one, but we can approach the Almighty in many ways.

|| Namo Devyai Mahaa-Devyai Shivaayai Satatam Namah |
Namah Prakrtyai Bhadraayai Niyataah Prannataah Sma Taam ||1|| 


1.1:Salutations to the Devi, to the Mahadevi; Salutations Always to Her Who is One with Shiva(the Auspicious One).
1.2:Salutations to Her Who is the Auspicious (being One with Shiva) Primordial Source of Creation and Controller of Everything; We Bow Alwaysto Her. 

[Note: Here, Shiva is not an entity, but a reference to the 6th chakra (Ajna chakra, also known as the symbolic third-eye chakra). The Shiva and the Shakti - the masculine and feminine - join within Sahasrara (the 7th chakra, the highest chakra) to create brahma-ranhdra, the transcendence of both. It is a reference to 'Sudarshan Chakra' as well as the ArdhaNarishvari concept... denoted by the syncretic form of Shiva-Parvati (possibly 6th and 7th chakra). |Ishvari/Shakti is Shivah Herself. She is the Shivah of Sankara/Rudra-Siva/Neelkath/Byomkesh fame ~ in a human/transcendental manifestation (leela-avatars). The way this Shivah is depicted is largely allegorical; however the face is not a rugged face. (For Shiv-Sati and Shiv-Parvati refer the relevant passages.) |Parvati's consort is, therefore, a namesake Shiva... and not the Shiva of Neelkanth/Byomkesh/Sankara/Rudra-Siva fame. The former is not worshipped during Durga Puja. Even Himavat (also known as Himavant, the ruler of the Himalaya kingdom of ancient India and the personification of the Himalayan mountains) - Parvati's father - is believed to not have considered him worthy of his illustrious daughter. [~ This Shiva is thought to have been rather irresponsible and given to spending time in avoidable company. Parvati's consort is unwelcome in her family; during Durga Puja a tiny idol of this Shiva is kept behind the idol of the Goddess - to symbolize this. So, probably, he was a source of considerable disappointment and/or embarrassment and/or annoyance. Devi Parvati also brings up her children. Her consort's involvement is very little. Goddess Parvati seems to have rejected her consort - the namesake Shiva. She does not appear to have done so publicly, though; but there is a subtle severance of the bonds - as can be gathered from the Annapoorna story. ~ Kashi is mentioned - she moved to Kashi along with her children. But then, since the fabled Buddhist land or mythical kingdom of Shambhala is believed to be the real Haridvar, the actual Manas Sarovar, Kailash, Rishikesh or 'Agni Tirtha' as well as the real Prayag... this story may have actually transpired in Shambhala.] ~ However, given the similarity in name (Rudra-Siva and the consort/namesake Shiva), narratives (probably) have confluenced and merged. The Shiva of Neelkanth/Byomkesh/Sankara/Rudra-Siva fame is Parvati Herself. (And, this perhaps also is a part of the Gemini (the twins) aspect). ~ Himavat's wife and queen consort is Meena or Minavati, the daughter of Mt. Meru. Probably some allegory is involved here. Or maybe Minavati hailed from Shambhala, since the allegorical Mt. Meru is regarded as the location of the fabled Buddhist land or mythical kingdom of Shambhala. ~ And, therefore, Devi Parvati - popularly known as Goddess Durga - hailed from the ancient Himalaya kingdom and/or Shambhala. And so, very likely, She is the Shivah of Shambhu Nath (~ Ruler/Guardian [Nath] of Shambhala) fame as well. BG 10.25: || sthāvarāṇāḿ himālayaḥ || ~ "and of immovable things I am the Himālayas". ~ Therefore, it is unlikely that Parvati actually hailed from the eastern parts of modern India. ... Probably - given her great deeds (which protected and preserved), her fame traveled far and wide - she was respected and revered by all; thus, her story was adopted by other regions too. She became their own. | BG 10.34: || kīrtiḥ śrīr vāk ca nārīṇāḿ smṛtir medhā dhṛtiḥ kṣamā || ~ "Among women I am glorious deeds (kīrtiḥ), radiance (śrīr- Gauri), fine speech/persuasion (vāk - think of Devi Sarasvati/Brahmi and the Mohini-avatar), memory/clarity of thought/discernment (smṛtir - think of Devi Parvati and the Mohini-avatar), intelligence (medhā - think of Devi Sarasvati and the Mohini-avatar), resilience/steadfastness (dhṛtiḥ - courage of the mind - think of Devi Sarasvati and Devi Parvati and her various forms) and patience/forgiveness/high-mindedness/magnanimity/nobility of spirit (kṣamā - the ability to rise above selfish interests or pettimindedness)."|Note:Devi Parvati, Vaishnavi or Vaishno Devi, DeviKatyayani, Devi Chamunda, Devi Brahmi or Brahmani (goddess Sarasvati), Devi Narasimhi, Devi Varahi, Devi Maheshvari (also known as Raudri and Rudrani) et al - is all different (female) forms or transcendental manifestations of Goddess Adi Shakti (the Cosmic Entity or Ishvari.)

Devi Parvati's consort - also named Shiva - is very likely the Shiva of the Bhasmasura story. [~ This Shiva is not to be confused for Rudra-Siva - who was also Neelkanth/Sankara/Shambhu Nath/Byomkesh simultaneously. That is Devi Parvati herself. Therefore, the Rudra-Siva of all those glorious deeds was a female. |Devi Adi Shakti - the Cosmic Entity, Ishvari - is also Rudra-Siva since she possesses the powers of dissolution (refer the above stotra-s.) Devi Parvati - popularly known as Goddess Durga - is Goddess Adi Shakti's human manifestation - transcendental avatar.]|Bhasmasura (tr: Ash-Man) performed penance/prayed to or propitiated Shiva = he flattered Shiva (Parvati's consort). ~ So, maybe, this Shiva was a somewhat obtuse character, easily pliable and/or easily susceptible to flattery. ... The power to turn anyone into ash by merely touching their head could be interpreted as disproportionate and detrimental authority. Maybe, Parvati's consort - in a bout of (over)generosity and impulsiveness, or perhaps that was his nature - granted such powers/authority to Bhasmasura, a malevolent/negative entity. (~ This Shiva is known to have had all sorts of bhakts.) However, the wily Bhasmasura - having obtained the said powers/authority - wanted to test it on Shiva himself... prompting the latter to run for dear life - straight to Lord Vishnu (~ the name given to the stabilizer/preserver/maintainer aspect of the Cosmic Entity) - Parvati Herself. ~ He narrates his predicament and implores her to rescue him. Thereupon, realizing the threat Bhasmasura posed to humanity (as a result of the disproportionate/detrimental authority), Parvati (as the ace diplomat and negotiator - the Mohini-avatar) meets Bhasmasura... and confuses him sufficiently enough to touch his own head. ~ Thus, Bhasmasura turns into ashes. Touch his own head = self-destruct. |Krishn, a male, is also known as "Mohan". Therefore, "Mohini" is simply the feminine of "Mohan"... and indicates a female. [Mohini means: rare, uncommon.] ~ The 'Sudarshan Chakra' is associated with this avatar - and this itself is indicative of all 16 qualities of a Purna Avatar (one in whom divinity is manifested fully.) | This tale could well be an allegorical and cautionary tale, applicable to all eras/yugs ~ about the flipside of susceptibility to flattery, avoidable company, excessive and unthinking generosity, impulsive nature and/or actions, and so forth and what it could lead to ~ self-inflicted and entirely avoidable troubles. |The other tale involving the Mohini-avatar and Mt. Meru (maybe) can be explained thus:she acquired the (metaphoric/allegoric) pot of 'ambrosia' from the malevolent entities ~ via diplomacy, and returned it to the positive forces; thereby enabling the latter to regain their position/pre-eminence. Thus, the machinations of the malevolent/negative entities came to a naught. (~ The positive entities of course had to perform their collective, sustained and tangible karm-yog - to regain that pre-eminence.) ... This tale too can well be an allegorical tale, applicable to all eras/yugs.] 

Here are a few more stotra from the Devi Mahatmyam ('The Magnanimity of the Goddess'/ also known as the Sri Sri chandipATh):

|| Raudraayai Namo Nityaayai Gauryai Dhaatryai Namo Namah |
Jyotsnaayai Ce[a-I]ndu-Ruupinnyai Sukhaayai Satatam Namah ||2|| 


2.1:Salutations to the Rudra, Salutations to the Eternal, the Shining One (Gauryai) and the Supporter of the Universe, 
2.2:Salutations Always to Her, Who has a Cool Brightness like the Moonlit Night, And the Radiant Form of the Moon, and Who is Joy Herself.  

[Note:Devi Shakti is Rudra. Therefore, She is Hari-Hara Herself. And so, the word Virupaksha - with oblique eyes - is used for both the aspects (Hari and Hara - ArdhaNarishvari + Gemini aspect); Virupaksha and Rudraksh (eye of Rudra) are, thus, one and the same. | In Bangla, oblique eyes is also known as lokkhi-tyara; [lokkhi = lakshmi] therefore, Lakshmi/Rudra-Siva/Shakti et al are very likely one and the same. ~ Different forms, different aspects, different eras/yugs, different challenges. ~ And, this should (perhaps)also explain what Hari-Hara Putra (Aiyappa) means.Hari-Hara or Parvati - in some other manifestation (transcendental avatar) - probably was his mother.Hari-Hara Putra and Kartik (Gauri-tanaya) may not be same.Both probably belonged to different eras. |Note:Vishnu and Shiva did not have a son who later came to be known as Hari-Hara Putra(Aiyappa). That is a result of misunderstanding and subsequent mistranslation of the ancient texts. ~ Vishnu (Hari) and Shivah (Hara - Rudra-Siva) are simply two aspects of the Cosmic Entity - Ishvari - Shakti/Adi Shakti - whose human manifestation or transcendental avatar is Devi Parvati. ~ Thus, Ishvari/Shakti/Adi-Shakti/Parvati is Hari-Hara Herself.]

~ And, BG 10.23: || rudranam sankaras casmi || ~ "Of all the Rudras I am Sankara" [Rudra-Siva].

|| Ati-Saumya-Ati-Raudraayai Nataas-Tasyai Namo Namah |
Namo Jagat-Pratisstthaayai Devyai Krtyai Namo Namah ||5|| 


5.1:Salutations to Her Who is Extremely Serene and Gentle like the Moon and Who is also like Rudra, 
5.2:Salutations to the Devi Who is the Supporter of the Universe and Salutations to Her Who is the Creator of the Universe.

|| Yaa Devii Sarva-Bhutessu Cetanety-Abhidhiiyate |
Namas-Tasyai Namas-Tasyai Namas-Tasyai Namo Namah ||7||


7.1:To that Devi Who in All Beings is Reflected as Consciousness, 
7.2:Salutations to Her, Salutations to Her, Salutations to Her, Salutations again and again.

|| Indriyaannaam-Adhisstthaatrii Bhutaanaam Ca-Akhilessu Yaa |
Bhuutessu Satatam Tasyai Vyaapti-Devyai Namo Namah ||27||
 


27.1: (Salutations) To that DeviWho Governs the Faculty of Senses(~ the sentience aspect: the ability to feel, perceive, and comprehend or to experience. It is necessary for cognition) of Beings in All the Worlds, 
27.2:Salutations to Her Who is the Devi Who Always Pervadesall Beings.

|| Citi-Ruupenna Yaa Krtsnam-Etad-Vyaapya Sthitaa Jagat |
Namas-Tasyai Namas-Tasyai Namas-Tasyai Namo Namah ||28||
 


28.1: (Salutations to Her) Who in the Formof Consciousness Pervades This Universe and Abides in It, 
28.2:Salutations to Her, Salutations to Her, Salutations to Her, Salutations again and again.

~ And, BG 10.22: || indriyanam manas casmi bhutanam asmi cetana || ~ "Of the senses (indriyanam) I am the mind (manas); and in living beings (bhutanam) I am the living force" ~ (cetana, consciousness; consciousness and conscience are two different things;consciousness[cetana]is awareness, sentience - the ability to feel, think, perceive,comprehend or to experience. It is necessary for cognition/perception.)

Here is Tagore's 'Tumi ki Kebali Chhobi': link02.

... Wonder what Mona Lisa's mysterious smile is all about.

Note on Rudra or Rudra-Siva:Shivam means "kind". Shiva (Sanskrit śiva) means:"the kindly/auspicious one" ~ the Lord of mercy and kindness. |Rudra means: the dispeller of darkness/ignorance/negativism and usherer of peace. Rudra is called "the archer" (Sanskrit: Śarva) and the arrow is an essential attribute of Rudra. The word is derived from the Sanskrit root śarv, which means, "to negate" or "to dispel". Hence, the name Śarva can be interpreted as: "One who can dispel/drive away darkness". The names Dhanvin ("bowman") and Bāṇahasta("archer", literally: "Armed with arrows in hands"/ Bāṇa = arrow, hasta = hand) also refer to archery/the archer. Rudra is described as armed with a bow and fast-flying arrows (baan/bāṇa). [Vishnu, i.e. the preserver/stabilizer/maintainer aspect of the Cosmic Entity/Primordial Being is also known as "Shaarnga-dhanvaa": One who aims the shaarnga bow.] Rudra-Siva - paradoxical and complex - is the Lord of mercy and kindness. He is also the destroyer and restorer - simultaneously. He first destroys and then restores; that is: he first destroys/dispels ignorance, confusion, illusion, delusion and the like. This brings forth introspection and transformation, change and reform - from within - it is thus an organic process. BG 10.34: || mṛtyuḥ sarva-haraś cāham udbhavaś ca bhaviṣyatām || ~ "I am all-consuming time, and I am the generating principle/cause/energy of all that is yet to be." (~ Alternatively: "I am all-consuming time, and I am too the birth of all that shall come into being."~ Here is Tagore's 'Aloker ei jharna dharaye dhuiye dao':link. |Rudra: also means: one who makes everyone weep: "ru", to cry or to teach, "rud", to make a person weep, and "dra" to flow. Hence Rudra is considered as a deity who teaches the supreme knowledge to all and whose energy flows in everything. Rudra essentially means, "to go beyond suffering". When the word is split as RU and DRA it implies "flight from lamentation", or "travel away from tears" - a state beyond suffering. Rudra is sometimes referred to as "The Lord or Sovereign of the Universe" (īśānādasya bhuvanasya). Rudra is also "the roarer". In the Rg Veda, Rudra has been praised as the "mightiest of the mighty". Rudra can also mean: "the red one, the brilliant one" from a lost root rud-, "to be red" or "to shine". ~ "rukh draavayathi, iti rudraha" - where 'rukh' means sorrow/misery, 'draavayathi' means to drive out or eliminate and 'iti' means that which or he who, implies 'Rudra' to be the eliminator of darkness/ignorance and usherer of peace. In other contexts the word rudra can simply mean Ekadasa Rudras- the eleven Rudras. [*There are eleven Rudras, of whom Sankara, Rudra-Siva, is preeminent. Goddess Parvati/Durga Herself. ~ Rudra-Siva is also an honorific - for the manifestations or transcendental avatars of the Cosmic Entity - Goddess Adi Shakti... due to their karm and contribution.]In other contexts, the word rudra can simply mean "the number eleven". The word "rudraksha" (Sanskrit: rudrākşa = rudra and akşa"eye"), or "eye of Rudra", is used as a name both for the berry of the Rudraksha tree, and a name for a string of the prayer beads made from those seeds. Rudra is said to have healing remedies, as the best physician of physicians, and as possessed of a thousand medicines. This is described in Rudra-Siva's alternative name Vaidyanatha (Lord of Remedies). [Rudraksha and Virupaksha are thus one and the same.] |Rudra Gayatri Mantra: || yo rudro agnau yo apsu ya oṣadhīṣu yo rudro viśvā bhuvanā viveśa tasmai rudrāya namo astu || ~ "To the Rudra who is fire, who is in water, who is in trees and plants, who has entered into the entire Universe, to that Rudra let our salutations go."| Here is a popular Rabindrasangeet, possibly Tagore's ode to Devi Sarasvati: link. There is forever the Primordial in him. In his songs there emerges all the brilliance of the universe as it goes through a dawning somewhere deep within time and space. ~ What is remarkable though is the similarity of the lyrics with those of the Rudra Gayatri Mantra. ... So, was Devi Sarasvati also Rudra-Siva? [Also, 'coz even Krishn, a male, is Rudra-Siva*. ~ Therefore, Rudra-Siva may not have been a single entity;it perhaps was an honorific too. However, Rudra-Siva does not have a rugged face. 'Coz the Cosmic Entity/Primordial Being is a female - Ishvari - Adi Shakti or Goddess Shakti. The avatars - including the male ones, like Ram or Krishn, are Her human manifestations or transcendental avatars. Hence, they are not depicted with a rugged countenance. It is symbolic. ~ If we understand this, we can then fully comprehend the concept of ArdhaNarishvari + what Mona Lisa's mysterious smile is all about.]

*BG 10.23: || rudranam sankaras casmi || ~ "Of all the Rudras I am Sankara" [Rudra-Śiva].

BG 10.35: || māsānāḿ mārga-śīrṣo 'ham ṛtūnāḿ kusumākaraḥ || ~ "Of months I am Mārgaśīrṣa [November-December], and of seasons I am spring". | Mrigashīrsha: Sanskrit mṛgaśiras (also spelled Mārgaśīrṣa/Mṛgaśira) - the 5th nakṣatra or lunar mansion - as used in Vedic astronomy and astrology, is the constellation Orion (also known as Kaalpurush, meaning: Timeless, Eternal or Ancient). ~ The first two carana/pada (quarters) of this nakṣatra are part of Vṛṣabha Rāśi or Taurus (bull). The latter half of this star belongs to Mithuna Rāśi (Gemini). | Gemini - the twins, but that is not literal. [Here, it a reference to the concept of ArdhaNarishvari.] | The Rig Veda refers to the Orion Constellation as Mriga (The Deer). ~ The term Mṛgaśira is a composite of two Sanskrit words, mṛgameaning animal (can also mean: deer) and śira meaning head or precisely, the top of the head. 

Here is Tagore's 'Ogo Kajal Nayona Harini' - possibly yet another ode to Devi Sarasvati: link.  

BG 10.35: || māsānāḿ mārga-śīrṣo 'ham || ~ "Of months I am Mārgaśīrṣa" [November-December] ~  Kālabhairava Aṣṭamī (or Kālabhairava Jayanti) falls on Kṛṣṇa Pakṣa Aṣṭamī of the month of Mārgaśīrṣa (also spelled Mṛgaśira/Mrigashīrsha ~ November-December). On this day it is said that Lord Rudra-Śiva appeared on earth in the manifestation (avatāra) as Śrī Kālabhairava. [Kāla or kaalah = time; Bhairava = the Primordial Sound, the Shabda Brahmn- pranavah/Omkara/pranava naad, the sound of the universe itself; OM or AUM - is very auspicious. The Cosmic Entity/Primordial Being is Omswaroop - manifestation of OM or AUM.] 

BG 10.35: || ṛtūnāḿ kusumākaraḥ || ~ "and of seasons I am spring." 

~ Makara Sankranti (or Pongal) marks the beginning of Uttarayan. [This time of year is generally associated with Sarasvati and Vishnu (the stabilizer/preserver/maintainer aspect of the Cosmic Entity.)] | Uttarayan begins from the day of Makara Sankranti ~ heralding the arrival of spring and marking the beginning of Vasant Panchami (~ also known as: Shree Panchami/Sarasvati Puja] - to pay our respect for knowledge and learning. |'Vasant' comes from the word 'spring' as this festival heralds the beginning of the spring season. New leaves and blossoms appear in the trees with the promise of new life and hope. Vasant Panchami also announces the arrival of another big springtime event - Holi, the festival of colours. |Uttarayan is a combination of two Sanskrit words, 'uttar' meaning northward and 'ayan' meaning movement towards. It celebrates the sun-god's northward movement. ~ It was on this day that Lord Vishnu is believed to have (symbolically curbed)/buried the heads of ever-increasing negativism (euphemistically known as Asuras) under the Mandar Parvat (Mt. Meru - the central 'mountain' of the world.) So this occasion also represents the beginning of a new era. (The Dasavatara depicts Lord Vishnu -i.e. the stabilizing/preserving/maintainer aspect of the Cosmic Entity/Primordial Being -as supporting Mt. Meru on his back ~ as the Kurma Avatar.)|Many people also conflate Makara Sankranti (Uttarayan) with the Winter Solstice (which falls on December 21/22).

~ Thus, Rudra-Śiva, Hari-Hara, Vishnu-Rudra, Sankara, Neelkanth, Shakti (Goddess Adi Shakti), Parvati, Krishn, Shri Ram, Dasavatara, etc are all one and the same. ~ Different forms (male and female of the Cosmic Entity - Ishvari - Goddess Adi Shakti) ~ different times, different eras and different challenges. 

~ Here is Tagore's ode to destiny (Devi Sarasvati) - 'Mayabano Biharini Harini': link 

[~ And this should help us understand what the golden deer mentioned in the Ramayana ('The Exertions of Shri Ram') means. But then, Shri Ram is also a manifestation or transcendental avatar of the Cosmic Entity. Ravana was not quite a negative entity per se, but (his favourite son) Meghnaad was. And, Ravana (later) succumbed to his base nature - excessive ego, vainglory and anger - which in turn clouded his better judgement. Ravana's ten heads alludes to this; it also represents ten kingdoms. Despite this, Ravana was not a Cakravartin-raja. [Top-heavy and 'too many cooks spoil the broth'.] ~ Mandodari - Ravana's queen - was Sita's real mother; both were so alike that even Hanuman-ji was confused. | After the fall of Ravana, and the dismantling of various weaponry - the sagacious Vibhisana (Ravana's younger brother) was installed on the throne - by Shri Ram. Vibhisana, Ram, Lakshman, Sita, Hanuman-ji, Angad, Riksharaj Jambavan et al became firm friends and allies. Thus, Ayodhaya, Lanka, Kishkindha, etc became firm allies. It was a multidimensional relationship, almost a confederation, and not merely a transactional alliance. Peace was restored. And this would have given a fillip to trade and other economic activity, besides curbing unwanted wars... and drainage of resources.]

And, Devi Sarasvati is Varadey Kaamarupinee (~ the fulfiller of wishes. In other words: Destiny or 'Lady Luck'. Kaamarupinee = kamadhenu).

BG 10.28: || dhenūnām asmi kāmadhuk || ~ "among cows I am the surabhi" (also known as kamadhenu - the "wish-fulfilling cow" ~ possibly a metaphor for prosperity, luck, etc.) 

~ Rivers and cows are often poetically correlated in the Rig Veda. (~ Cows emerging out of mountains - is a reference to various rivers; in the Arya 'way of life' rivers and water-bodies were not polluted. | This should also help us understand what 'cows' are associated with Krishn. Gopa = ruler, king. | Also, Krishn is associated with Prachya - Eastern Country - Praesii or Prasioi to the Greeks, not Madhyadesha - Middle Country.)

... Tagore's "Jana-Gana-Mana Adhinayaka..." (ruler/leader/captain of the minds of all people) - our national anthem - too is an ode to that Bhagya Vidhata [ed. Lord of Destiny] - who (in Tagore's own words) "has from age after age held steadfast the reins of India's chariot through rise and fall, through the straight path and the curved." [Here is the complete five stanzas: link.] | Tagore says, Chir-saarathy; it means: perennial guide. ~ Lord Krishn is depicted with feminine features, it is symbolic. Possibly to indicate: it is Goddess Sarasvati (Destiny) as Lord Krishn - at yet another crucial turn of our history. 

Here is 'Mor Bina Othe': link 

Here is 'Chaander Haasir Baandh Bhengechhe': link. |'Neel gaganer lalatkhani chandan-e aaj makha,banibaner hamsa-mithun melechhe aaj pakha | Parijaater keshar niye dharaye, sashi, chadao ki e |Indrapuri-r kon ramoni bashar pradeep jaalo.'- This sublime composition transcends an ode to Goddess Sarasvati (Destiny). | Also, BG 10.25: || aśvatthaḥ sarva-vṛkṣāṇāḿ || ~ "Of all trees I am the (asvatthah)" - fig tree (it can mean: banyan tree as well as the Peepal/aśvatthaḥ, or maybe both). ~ The Parijaat tree (Kalpataru or Kalpavrisha - wish-bearing tree) is very likely the peepal. It is associated with heaven (svargaloka); parts of the ancient Himalayan kingdom too can be associated with svarga on earth.

Tagore - a multifaceted personality: universal bard, renaissance poet and a veritable colossus; a versatile genuis, a public figure of peerless eminence, a playwright/dramatist/lyricist, a thought leader, a humanitarian, a genuine science enthusiast and one of the finest ambassadors of Indian/Eastern thought and philosophy to the rest of the world. The maestro's oeuvre is the life-work of a titan. ~ To understand the three most important notions in philosophy (darshan-sastra): of harmony, balance, and integrity - Tagore delved into the bottomless treasure-trove of the Upanishads, and these he imbibed. He let these ideas define him, not in the sense of limiting him, but lifting him up to meet the Higher Self (the Supersoul). ~ And this also gave his poetry its distinctive character.

The Gayatri Mantra/Savitr Mantra: || AUM Bhur Bhuvah Svaha Tat Savitur Varenyam Bhargo Devasya Dhimahi Dhiyoyonah Prachodayat[link2] || ~ Aum. Let the light of Savitri enter into My Spirit and illumine My mind and Enrich My Spirit. 

[~ The Gayatri Mantra is also known as Savitr Mantra; Savitrmeans the Sun (Surya-dev), the majestic effulgent Sun-god (jyotiḥ, Sūrya, Aaditya) - Pratyaksh-Brahmn - the manifest (pratyaksh) God ~ who symbolizes, the One, self-effulgent, glorious divinity blessing one and all. ~ This 24-syllable hymn from the Rig Veda is the greatest of all mantras; one of the most auspicious and oldest of mantras, it is considered one of the most universal of all mantras, invoking the universal Brahmn/Universal Consciousness/Param-atma as the principle of knowledge and the illumination of the primordial sun.]

~ BG 10.35: || gāyatrī chandasām aham || ~ "I am Gāyatrī mantra among the Vedic mantras." 

Devi Sarasvati, the Goddess of Learning, is the deity of Gayatri, the fountain of fine arts and science, and the symbol of supreme Vedantic knowledge; she is also Savitri - the goddess of dawn who dispels the fog of ignorance and confusion and lights the diya or lamp of Eternal Knowledge/Para Vidya. [The Sanskrit word sara means essence and sva means self. Thus, Sarasvati denotes the essence of the self. She is also known as 'Veena-pustak dharini' or bearer of the musical instrument (veena) and a book (pustak).]

India in Tagore's vision is the pilgrimage (pilgrim centre) of world humanity as she is the great synthesizer and unifier in the midst of manifold differences through centuries. The bard wrote: "... Hethay shobarey hobe milibarey anato shirey, aaji Bharat-er mahamanob-er sagaro-tirey." ~ Tagore's sublime "Mahamanober Shagoro Tirey" ('Indian Pilgrimage' or 'India - the Pilgrim Centre') goes much beyond unity in diversity. | During his travels and lecture-tours he carried his message of human unity to all the important countries of Asia, America and Europe. He believed that "True knowledge is that which perceives the unity of all things in God." ~ Tagore's philosophical and spiritual thoughts transcend all limits of language, culture, and nationality. In his writings, the poet endowed with intuitive perception takes us on a spiritual quest and gives us a glimpse of the infinite in the midst of the finite, unity at the heart of all diversity, and the Divine in all beings and things of the universe. Tagore, the universal bard brought out the essence of Eastern spirituality in his poetry like no other poet. | Tagore, almost as a pilgrim, moved around the world either in person or in his thoughts - to search for the universalism of humanity, or the wholeness of being. Much of what Tagore experienced in life has been expressed in songs with musical and verbal imagery and rhythms designed to support and enhance each other. [~ Those who are familiar with the original in Bangla can never quite be satiated with their English translations.] ~ To Tagore, reality was not an idea, but rather that ecstatic awakening when God and the soul (human soul or jiva-atma) in a vivid and transcendent moment of communion are known to be one [~ eternal bliss/contentment/spiritual ecstasy of "self-realization" ~ Sat-cit-ānanda. The confluence of the universal consciousness or Supersoul with the mere Self or Jiva-atma.] Tagore's religion of humanity is the awakening of the individual self's ego-consciousness in the universal consciousness - a process of realizing the Infinite'I' within the finite'I', or a process of transcending the narrow or self-centred philosophy to the philosophy of life. ~ It is brilliantly conveyed through 'Nirjarer Swapnabhango' ('Awakening of the Fountain'). His gift of lyricism and song shines forth. Tagore's poetry is not mere phrasal dexterity or tuneless ditties, rather it is genuine passion felt in the heart's deep core; it is refreshing to say the least. It is like a draught from a pure spring, or a spiritual oasis in a desert of poetic wasteland. 

Here is 'Prana Bhoriye Trisha Hariye': link. |  '... Tabo bhubhaney tabo bhabhaney morey aaro aaro aaro dao sthan | Aaro alo, aaro alo, ei nayaney prabhu (My Lord) dhalo | surey surey banshi purey tumi aaro aaro aaro dao taan. ... Mor aami (ego-consciousness) dube jak nemey sudhadharey aponare (universal consciousness/Supersoul) tumi aaro aaro aaro karo daan' ~ Tagore is referring to the spiritual ecstasy of 'self-realization' (~ the confluence of the mere Self/finite with the Higher Self/Infinite).

Sheemar majhe ashim tumi / bajao apon shur (Within the finites, you the Infinite play your own tune - link). ~ It is a song that takes you closer to Creation, indeed imbues you with thoughts of the ties that bind you to your Creator.

Here is 'Jagorane Jaay Bibhabori':link. 

Here is 'Oi Mahamanaba Aashe' (Cometh the great one): link. 

Here is 'Akash Bhora Surjo Tara': link  

................................................................... 


Krishn is very simple... and at the same time infinitely sublime. [BG 10.32: || vādaḥ pravadatām aham || ~ "I am logic of the logician".] ~ He is characterized by nobility/noble-mindedness; quietly magnificent; exalted, rather of ultimate spiritual and intellectual quality; inspiringreverence and wonder because of its nobility, grandeur and immensity. ~ Thus he is Gabheeratma: whose essence is beyond understanding, one who is too deep to be fathomed (refer Meghavarnam). [~ And so, it is said that Mahat or Ishvara (Primal Creative Energy) - the Cosmic Entity/Being - the highest possible conception of Brahmn (the one self-existent impersonal spirit, the Divine Essence), is beyond all thought.] |He exhorts/advises humanity to collective action; his call is a call to duty (right actions for the greater good) - to combined/collaborative action/karm-yog - to walk the talk - for the larger good - Loka-kalyana or Loka-sangraha ("welfare of all" - the common good: to build and sustain a better [prosperous, progressive and inclusive] society/civilization.) | Literal translations, over-simplification or over-complication are misleading. [~ One needs to contemplate and deliberate deeply - to understand/comprehend his purpose, his karm and his message/advise/guidance/guidelines - now known as the Srimad Bhagavad Gita. Only then it will percolate.] 

He speaks in sublime metaphors, allegories, similies, and so on. So, when he says: || jhaṣāṇāḿ makaraś cāsmi || ~ "I am the crocodile among the fishes" (can also mean aquatic creatures) - it is not literal. ~ A crocodile can be associated with patience and precision - yes, but crocodile is makara in Sanskrit; it is associated with Makara Sankranti (also known as: Pongal) - the most important Sankranti and one of the most auspicious occasions, signifying renewal/re-energizing (it is [therefore] regarded as the beginning of an auspicious phase). Sankranti means transition; transmigration of the Sun from one Rāshi (constellation of the zodiac in Indian astronomy) to the next. Makara Sankranti marks the transition of the Sun into Makara rasi (Capricorn). Scientifically, this day marks the beginning of warmer and longer days compared to the nights; thus the chill of winter in on decline. In other words, Sankranti marks the termination/closure of winter season and beginning of a new harvest or spring season. ~ It is perhaps the only festival/occasion whose date always falls on the same day every year: 14 January, with some exceptions, when the festival is celebrated on 13 January or 15 January (in a leap year). Makara Sankranti marks the arrival of spring in India. ... And the spring season is associated with Krishn; he is the personification of spring. BG 10.35: || māsānāḿ mārga-śīrṣo 'ham ṛtūnāḿ kusumākaraḥ ||~ "Of months I am Mārgaśīrṣa [November-December], and of seasons I am spring" (maybe that's why Shyamsundar Krishn is the personification of spring. He is Lord of Nature. The spring season also [symbolically] indicates a new beginning.) [Note:Agrahāyaṇa or Mārgaśīrṣa: The word Agrahāyaṇa means the month of Ayana or Equinox (agra = first + ayana = travel of the sun, equinox). AgrahAYanI is related to 'beginning of the year'.] 

~ Makara Sankranti is the day when the majestic Sun-god (Suryadev/Pratyaksh-Brahmn) begins his movement towards the northern hemisphere, and thus it signifies: 'Tamaso mā jyotir gamaya'- may you go higher and higher, towards more and more Light (knowledge, prosperity, spiritual light, wisdom, intellectual illumination, and so on). It is the time to shun negative thinking (downward slide, etc); positive thinking is re-energizing. ~ The Sun-god stands for an embodiment of knowledge, prosperity, spiritual light, wisdom, intellectual illumination, and so on. He also stands for Pratyaksha-Brahmn - the manifest God - who symbolizes, the one, self-effulgent, glorious divinity blessing one and all.] ~ Makara Sankranti signifies renewal/new life: to turn away from the (symbolic) 'darkness'/confusion of delusion, ignorance, pessimism, et al, and to begin to build a new life with bright light/auspicious effulgence/light divine (within us) - to shine brighter and brighter (i.e. to progress, flourish and prosper). It is a festival/occasion celebrated all over the country with great fervour, gaiety and kite-flying. [Note:the Shankhachil or "Brahminy Kite" is distinctive and contrastingly coloured, with chestnut plumage except for the white head and chest and black wing tips. In India, the noble-natured Brahminy Kite (Haliastur indus) is considered as the contemporary representation of Garuda, the 'vaahan' of Lord Narayan/Vishnu. ~ The Brahminy Kite (often referred to as the Singapore Bald Eagle) is also called Shankhachil, 'coz the white plumage of this bird is similar to the white of a conch-shell. ~ Brahminy is derived from Brhm (pure knowledge, wisdom, enlightenment, and so on) or Brahmn - Universal Consciousness.]


~ If Winter comes, can Spring be far behind? asked Shelley. 

Spring/Rituraj -the King of all seasons - represents beauty, new life, and creation. [~ To understand the true significance of the spring festival/Vasant Panchami it is important to understand the essence of Goddess Sarasvati, the presiding deity of learning, aesthetics and creativity.] ~ Post-Makara Sankranti, when the earth begins to get closer to the sun, the cold winter begins to yield to delightful spring. Vasant Panchami marks the beginning of Vasant or spring, when it is time for every tree, branch and bower to spring to new life with blooms and bursts of colour and fragrance, vibrant in festive display. The flower (kusumā) is a beautiful symbol of life and regeneration. ~ Hence the spring season is Kusumakar (kusumākaraḥ) or Rituraj, the king of all seasons [BG 10.35: ~ ṛtūnāḿ kusumākaraḥ - "and of seasons I am spring"]. ... Krishn not only associates himself with trees and plants... but also with animals, aquatic creatures, birds, etc. ~ Maybe to indicate that as the Creator he does not discriminate. [Thus, he is suhrit: Friend of all creatures. In other words: Pasupati. ~ However, pasu does not mean animals alone; it refers to all creatures - and so, the animals depicted in the "Pasupati Seal" are very likely allegorical.) ~ Lord Krishn is, after all, the manifestation of the universal Brahmn/Universal Consciousness.]~ But then, even Einstein advised not to judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree.

Uttarayan begins from the day of Makara Sankranti (January 14, 2014)... heralding the arrival of spring and marking the beginning of Vasant Panchami (~ also known as: Shree Panchami/Sarasvati Puja [04/02/2014] - to pay our respect for knowledge and learning. |'Vasant' comes from the word 'spring' as this festival heralds the beginning of the spring season. New leaves and blossoms appear in the trees with the promise of new life and hope. Vasant Panchami also announces the arrival of another big springtime event - Holi, the festival of colours. Here is: 'Esho Shyamala Sundara': link.

[Note: Tagore said: 'Naba Anande Jaago': link. ~ ParaBrahmn/Brahmn is Universal Consciousness (Cosmic Light or Light Divine). Pratyaksha-Brahmn - the manifest (pratyaksh) God, who symbolizes, the One, self-effulgent, glorious divinity blessing one and all is the Sun-god (Suryadev). ~ The Sun-god stands for an embodiment of knowledge, prosperity, spiritual light, wisdom, intellectual illumination, and so on. ~ Refer the relevant passages on Makara Sankranti/Pongal.]

Narayan Gayatri Mantra: || Om Narayanaye Vidmahe, Vasudevaya Dhimahi, Tanno Vishnu Prachodayat || ~ "OM. Let us meditate on Sri Narayana, the Lord who dwells in all beings, and is known as the Sovereign of the world. May that Sri Vishnu inspire and illumine our mind and understanding."|Alternatively:"OM. Let us meditate on the Great Lord Narayana who pervades all creation. May that glorious Maha Vishnu, who appeared on Earth as the adorable Sri Krishna, son of Vasudeva, inspire and illumine our mind and understanding."

|| Mangalam Bhagavaan Vishnu Mangalam Garuda-Dhvaja Mangalam Pundarikaaksho Mangalaayatano Hari || ~ Mangalam = auspicious. Mangalaayatano = manifestation of auspiciousness. Pundarikaaksho = lotus-eyed or large-eyed; one whose eyes are shaped like lotus petals. [Puṇḍarīka/Pundarika or Pankaja/Svetakamala/Dhavala (pronounced: DA wahl) kamala/Shubhra Kamala is "white/pure white lotus". Pure white signifies pristine, embodiment of pure knowledge (Para Vidya). It also signifies tranquility.] Garuda-Dhvaja = the symbol or insignia of Lord Narayan. | Lord Narayan is also shown holding a lotus flower; it is usually pale red in colour. [The pale-red lotus is padma in Sanskrit.] This is the supreme lotus, for the highest deity. Lord Narayan is Anish - Supreme; He is Aadinath- the Cosmic/Primordial Being/the Foremost: the Highest Creative Intelligence; the Lord of Creation - Creator of the universe (and all that is to be found within it); the motive power and guiding spirit behind the mathematically precise universes(in other words: the supreme authority of the universe/cosmos - Jagat-patih.) 

The Gayatri Mantra/Savitr Mantra: || AUM Bhur Bhuvah Svaha Tat Savitur Varenyam Bhargo Devasya Dhimahi Dhiyoyonah Prachodayat[link2] || ~ Let the light of Savitri enter into My Spirit and illumine My mind and Enrich My Spirit. [~ The Gayatri Mantra is also known as Savitr Mantra; Savitr means the Sun (Surya-dev), the majestic effulgent Sun-god (jyotiḥ, Sūrya, Aaditya) - Pratyaksh-Brahmn - the manifest (pratyaksh) God ~ who symbolizes, the One, self-effulgent, glorious divinity blessing one and all.] 

The Gayatri Mantra - a 24-syllable hymn from the Rig Ved is the greatest of all mantras; one of the most auspicious and oldest of mantras, it is considered one of the most universal of all mantras, invoking the universal Brahmn/Universal Consciousness as the principle of knowledge and the illumination of the primordial Sun. ~ BG 10.35: || gāyatrī chandasām aham || ~ I am Gāyatrī mantra among the Vedic mantras. [~ Krishn is essentially indicating that He is the manifestation of that (unmanifested) universal Brahmn/Universal Consciousness (Cosmic Light or Light Divine). Devi Sarasvati, the Goddess of Learning, is the deity of Gayatri; she is also Savitri - the goddess of dawn.] ~ (Do also read the relevant passages on Gayatri Mantra.)|The phrase OM Bhoor Bhuvah Svah is added to the mantra, when it is recited. OM represents the Supreme Consciousness/Universal Consciousness/universal Brahmn, and the Bhoor, Bhuvah and Svah are the three planes or levels of consciousness. tat savitur varenyam means "that revered God (Surya-dev, the self-effulgent majestic Sun-god - Pratyaksh/Manifest-Brahmn - the manifestation of whom is Gayatri)"; bhargo devasya dhimahi means "dispel the ignorance with divine wisdom"; dhiyo yo nah prachodayat means "lead our intellects (buddhi) and energy in right direction". | Savitur: The creative principle of light manifesting through the sun (Surya-dev/Sun-god).

|| Sarasvati Mahabhage Vidye Kamalalochane Vishwaroope Vishaalaakshi Vidyam Dehi Namosthute || ~ O, the great Goddess Sarasvati, the lotus-eyed personified knowledge... O, large-eyed Goddess, taking the form of the whole universe, thou shower us with all the powers and glories of all knowledge that exist.

Sarasvati Gayatri Mantra: || OM Sarasvatyei Vidmahe, Brahmaputriye Dhimahi, Tanno Devi Prachodayat [link1] || ~ "OM. May we meditate on the Great Goddess Sri Sarasvati, the embodiment/manifestation of the Sun-God/Pratyaksh-Brahmn as well as Brhm/Brahma* (knowledge, learning, wisdom, culture, enlightenment, creativity, and so on). May that effulgent Maha Sarasvati Devi inspire and illumine our mind and understanding." [Hence she is known as *Brahmi.]

Surya Gayatri Mantra: || OM Baskaraya Vidhmahe, Divakaraya Dhimahi, Tanno Suryah Pracodayat || ~ "OM. May we realize Bhaskara, the shining one. Let us meditate on that Divakara, the presiding deity over the day, and may that Surya, the sun god, illumine our mind and understanding." 

The Sanskrit word sara means essence and sva means self. Thus Sarasvatidenotes the essence of the self. She is also Savitri - the goddess of dawn (refer the passages on Gayatri/Savitr Mantra) who dispels the fog of ignorance and lights the diya or lamp of Eternal Knowledge/Para Vidya. ~ Sri Sarasvati is considered as the daughter of the Sun-god (Surya-dev - Pratyaksh/Manifest-Brahmn) or Surya Kanya - the Goddess of Learning, the deity of Gayatri (refer the passages on Gayatri Mantra), the fountain of fine arts and science, and the symbol of supreme Vedantic knowledge. She is said to have invented Sanskrit, known as the mother of all languages, of scriptures and scholarship. It is also believed that it was her who discovered soma or amrita (*Somras?). The day (Sarasvati Puja day) is considered particularly auspicious for initiation into the realm of knowledge... and so, on the day of Sarasvati Puja, children are taught reading and writing their first word - in a symbolic initiation. Besides floral offerings (especially marigold and palash/kiṁśuka/Flame of the Forest - link3), books, musical instruments, and other objects related to the arts and scholarship are placed in front of the goddess to receive her blessings (~ all objects of writing and study are not used that day, but worshipped in veneration of the process of learning.) Earthen ink-pots (dawat: a = pronounced as "awe") and bamboo quills (khAger kalam / khAger: A = aa; kalam: here, a = pronounced as "awe";though many spell it as kolom, but O = the Sanskrit "o") too are placed before her. The ink is made from unboiled milk water, red colour powder and silver glitter called abhro. On this day nobody writes or read any books. (~ This signifies that the goddess bless the learners through the books placed in front of her.) Sarasvati is the patron of libraries; the goddess can also be symbolized by something as simple as a book, or an inkstand and a pen. School children, students, teachers, academicians, scientists, artists and craftsmen worship her to seek guidance and blessing. On her day of worship (Sarasvati Puja), offerings and flowers (marigold and palash) are placed in front of a symbol of the goddess and prayers (Sanskrit hymns) are chanted. Alpana/Rangoli - the design of a fish is considered auspicious. Students set a book aside for her to bless. Many worship their equipment - ploughs, carts, etc - because wisdom need not be acquired only through books. ~ Charnamrit is distributed at the end of the puja, while 'bhog prasad' (sweets made of khowa and paneer - like sandesh and barfi; shankalu (jicama) - the name derives from alu (tuber) and white shankh, which means conch, refers to its pearly white flesh; different types of fruits including guava, apples, dates, sugarcane, kul (Indian plum/Indian jijube); poori/luchi, baingan bhaja/fried eggplant, aloo ki sabji and halwa) from the offering (bhog) is consumed at the end of the puja. ['Bhuni mung ki khichri' (made with roasted mung dal and ghee), mixed vegetable curry called 'labra', chutney, papad and chaler payesh/rice kheer pudding too are eaten on Sarasvati Puja day.] Students also keep some flowers from the Goddess's feet inside their books - as symbolic blessing (for good results in forthcoming examinations.) |The correct Vedic pronunciation is 'Sarasvati', though many pronounce it as 'Saraswati'. She is known as 'Veena-pustak dharini' or bearer of the musical instrument (veena), and a book (pustak). Sarasvati Mantra, 'Pranam mantra' or Sanskrit prayer: || OM Sarasvati Mahabhagey, Vidye Kamalalochaney | Viswarupey Vishalakshi, Vidyam Dehi Namohastutey || Jaya Jaya Devi, Charachara Sharey, Kuchayuga Shobhita, Mukta Haarey | Veena Ranjita, Pustaka Hastey, Bhagavati Bharati, Devi Namohastutey || ~ O, the great Goddess Sarasvati, the lotus-eyed personified knowledge... O, large-eyed Goddess, taking the form of the whole universe, thou shower us with all the powers and glories of all knowledge that exist. |Salutations to the Goddess who is wisdom personified, who is the Goddess of knowledge and arts, whose essence is all-pervading; who is serene and adorned in radiant white attire; who is bearer of the musical instrument (veena) and a book (pustak); O wise and benevolent Goddess Sarasvati (Bharati - the Goddess of fine speech/persuasive powers/ vāk or vāc), we pay our respectful obeisance unto you. May you bless and guide us.

[*Note: Somras wasn't quite the 'elixir of immortality' (amrita); it is unlikely that such a drink ever existed. ~ Somras or Somaras probably was prepared from ingredients - some of which (very likely) no longer exist, and so, the Somaras too went into a Nirvikalpa Samadhi to awaken to moksha. Somras or Somaras was meant only for those who pursued the path of Brhm (knowledge); others consumed (e.g.) Madhu (prepared from grapes, etc). ~ Therefore, Somras or Somaras probably helped their mind (manas) to connect (yog) to the various layers of the universe/cosmos, and to other elements of nature, and so on, besides also boosting their energy, immunity and physical endurance. The ancient Vedic rishis and munis perhaps used it to take energy from the aether to awaken kundalini energy - to further their understanding of Vigjnana/Vedic Science - Laghima (becoming almost weightless/anti-gravity: ancient Vimanas - which were much more advanced than modern aircrafts - utilized this concept), Garima (becoming infinitely heavy/gravity-resistant), Aṇimā (reducing one's body even to the size of an aṇu/atom, i.e. infinite smallness; so aṇu is probably derived from aṇimā, though it may have been smaller than an atom), maybe even that of Pranavayu and Udanavayu (oxygen and hydrogen), and so on. (The Bose-Einstein condensate probably used the concept of "Avichi" [meaning waveless] and "Garbhodaka Ocean" that lies at the bottom of the universe; possibly a reference to the "sea" of Bose-Einstein Condensate that exists below the physical plane.) ~ The rishis and munis of yore were exceptionally learned beings, and pursued the path of knowledge (Brhm); therefore, Rishi, Maharshi and Brhmarishi were (very likely) honorifics - to indicate their levels of jnana. (Brhmarishi probably indicated the highest level.) | The terms force and matter is used for the Sanskrit terms Prana and Akasha (e.g. **Swami Vivekananda), though some (e.g. Tesla) understood these Sanskrit terms as energy and mass. (~ It is possible though that in the first half of the previous century, force and energy were not always clearly differentiated. Energy is considered to be a more proper translation of the Sanskrit term Prana.) |Soma becomes Haoma in the Avestan language, on account of the change in phonetics: wherein 'S' becomes 'Ha'. ~ A city called Hamunaptra was found in India in the 1850s when British engineers, trying to build a railroad, pillaged the area for bricks. In the 1920s, archaeologists began serious excavations. They found at the site a lost civilization; it was a complex/diversified, literate, urbanized, centrally located society; raw materials located in the area indicated that the civilization had long-distance trade with Mesopotamia. The civilization ended between 1900 and 1700 BC. ~ Perhaps due to a combination of factors, such as: climate change, change in rainfall pattern, rise in pollution levels, decline in trade, multiple challenges arising out of over expansion, and so on; maybe even a massive earthquake and/or flood. ~ Was Hamunaptra derived from Somaputra ~ my guess is as good as yours.| It is possible that later, other varieties of Somras or Somaras were discovered. The ancient Gandharva (do read the relevant passages on Gandharva) as well as the ancient Yaksha people (small-sized humans; e.g. Manthara is mentioned as Vamani, therefore, she was very likely a Yakshi; even Hanumanji was helped/guided by the Yaksha people to identify the hill with the medicinal herbs - sanjivni-booti - to revive Lakshman) too may have been aware of the ingredients required to make this varietyof "Somras" - due to their extensive knowledge of plants and herbs. Probably: some variant of the "Asvagandha" was an important ingredient for this drink, since this herb isstill known to enhance immunity and physical endurance, apart from its anti-inflammatory effects, besides being a traditional treatment for general fatigue, nervous exhaustion, malnutrition, insomnia, etc. (Note the presence of som in insomnia.) ~ Ashvagandha in Sanskrit means: "horse's smell" (ashva = horse, gandha = smell), probably also originating from the odour of its root which is similar to that of a sweaty horse. Thus this new variety of Somras probably infused anyone that partook of it with the strength/power of a horse; the metaphoric horse-power. ~ Even the shatavari and the licorice too may have gone into making this variety of Somras/Somaras. All these herbs are known to give the body and mind an energy boost or ojas (vigour), and hence, are referred to as 'soma-producing herbs' in Ayurveda. Therefore, "som" or "soma" may have been a reference to various vigour-enhancing herbs - that were required to prepare this energy drink. ~ However, it is possible that over time one or the other of the ingredients gradually disappeared from the face of the earth... and so, had to be replaced by lesser or alternative ingredients - the effect of which may not have been quite the same. ~ Thus, the later types of Somras or Somaras may not have been a uniform, homogeneous drink; in other words: there probably was various types of Somras: one for enduring the cold weather, another for curing various ailments, yet another for enhancing one's stamina (getting an energy boost), so on and so forth. ~ And this is quite reminiscent of the Druid Getafix's "magic potion" that worked wonders for the Gauls - by infusing them with awesome power.

**Brahmn is defined as the one self-existent impersonal spirit - the Divine Essence, from which all things emanate, by which they are sustained, and to which they return. Mahat or Ishvara (Primal Creative Energy) is the Cosmic Ruler/Cosmic Entity/Being - the highest possible conception of the Absolute, which is beyond all thought. (Mahat means literally the Great One, and is also interpreted as meaning universal mind or cosmic intelligence. Prana means energy [usually translated as life force] and Akasha means matter [usually translated as aether].) | Swami Vivekananda met with many of the well-known scientists of the time including Professor Helmholtz, Lord Kelvin and ***Nikola Tesla (the great scientist who specialized in the field of electricity.) | The meeting with the Swamiji greatly stimulated Tesla's interest in Eastern Science; Vivekananda's explanation of the Samkhya cosmogony and the theory of cycles given by the Vedas impressed him immensely. He was particularly struck by the resemblance between the Samkhya theory of matter and energy and that of modern physics. Swamiji later remarked during a lecture in India, "I myself have been told by some of the best scientific minds of the day, how wonderfully rational the conclusions of the Vedanta are. I know of one of them personally, who scarcely has time to eat his meal, or go out of his laboratory, but who would stand by the hour to attend my lectures on the Vedanta; for, as he expresses it, they are so scientific, they so exactly harmonize with the aspirations of the age and with the conclusions to which modern science is coming at the present time". Maybe Swamiji was hopeful that Tesla would be able to show that what we call matter is simply potential energy because that would reconcile the teachings of the Vedas with modern science. Tesla understood the Sanskrit terminology and philosophy and found that it was a good means to describe the physical mechanisms of the universe as seen through his eyes. (It would behoove anyone attempting to understand the science behind the inventions of Nikola Tesla to study Sanskrit and Vedic philosophy.) ~ Tesla apparently was unable to show the identity of energy and matter. The mathematical proof of the principle did come until about ten years later when Albert Einstein published his paper on relativity. ... Thus, the West then knew what had been known in the East for millenniums. 

***Born, so the stories go, in the middle of a thunderstorm in Serbia, Tesla has left a fascinating legacy to the world today. Magnetism is measured in Tesla, a unit named after him. He also showed that alternating current (A/C) was superior to direct current (D/C) - when it came to transmitting electricity over a distance. If he hadn't... the world would have been filled with electrical substations at the end of each road, because D/C doesn't do distance well. [~ AC is better for distributing power over a distance because it allows the easy changing of voltages with a transformer. Power is calculated as current times voltage (P = IV). For a given amount of power to be sent, a low voltage requires a higher current. But metal conducting wires have resistance; some of that precious power will be lost as heat in the wires. Power loss is given by P = I²R. So from this its obvious that low-voltage, high-current transmissions will cause a much greater power loss than high-voltage, low-current ones. This fact holds whether DC or AC is used. ~ But, and here is the clincher, transforming DC power from one voltage to another is difficult and expensive. But with AC these voltage changes can be done with simple and cheap transformer coils with no moving parts and no maintenance. Tesla wins in theory and in practice. |He also claimed to have worked out a 'dynamic theory of gravity' - even Einstein was unsuccessful at this - but it is yet to be published. So whether it is about plugging in mobile phone chargers or using wifi, it was Tesla, the unsung genius who made it all possible. His alternating current system for one still keeps the world alight to the present day. His other inventions and theories... all represent engineering feats of revolutionary capacity, opening new vistas of scientific advancement since their inception. | The question now, when one considers the current technological advances, the global energy demands and the effects on nature and climate, is - who will be the next great Tesla, to transform our technology age with a new way of thinking? 

Note on Swami Vivekananda:'If you want to know India, study Vivekananda. In him everything is positive and nothing negative.' was Rabindranath Tagore's advice to Romain Rolland(~ French dramatist, novelist, essayist and art historian who was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1915 "as a tribute to the lofty idealism of his literary production and to the sympathy and love of truth with which he has described different types of human beings".) [More on Tagore: link.]

Swamiji's stature makes him a universal figure. Vivekananda's message was really the message of modern humanity. His personality was rich and profound; unceasing in his activity, boundless in his love, profound and versatile in his wisdom, exuberant in his emotions - he was indeed a rare personality. ~ A fighter (for humanity, for universalism, and so on) to the core of his being, he was a worshipper of Shakti and gave a practical interpretation to the Vedanta ~ for the uplift of his countrymen. A Yogi of the highest spiritual level in direct communion with the truth, he devoted his whole life for the moral and spiritual uplift of his nation and of humanity. Vivekananda was energy personified, and action (karm-yog) was his message to humanity. In every way, he was integrating; he was seeing the forces for good, the constructive forces, in the different countries (he visited). Thus, Vivekananda's call to India to recognize herself - this again was not nationalism in the smaller sense, it was a kind of internationalism sublimated. |Vivekananda preached a great message that is not tied to any dos and don'ts. He addressed one and all. His message thus roused the heart of the youths in a most pervasive way. This message (at one and the same time) was about dignity and respect along with energy and power – dynamism; it imparted to others and pervaded his life with a wonderful dynamism. |It was Swamiji's hope that India would create a new social order and a new civilization by combining her best spiritual traditions with the latest advancements in science and technology. She would be rich both materially and spiritually. He knew that affluence was not enough, humanity had to be human too (humanism). Through his realization of the unique harmony that lies in all he wanted India to set an example before the whole world. "Arise, awake and stop not till the goal is reached" was his message. Swami Vivekananda propagated the ideal of performing selfless service to all (nishkam karma, selfless non-glory-seeking actions/service to humanity); his message enthused the youth of India and of the whole world to realize one's own self. | Swamiji made a tremendous impression, first in the USA and then also in England. The press paid him the highest tributes as an exponent of India's age-old values. This was the starting point of the Indian renaissance. Vivekananda advised against kupa-mandup syndrome (a frog in a well imagines the little well to be the whole world). He was not opposed to learning from the West, for he knew the West had some great qualities and it was because of those qualities that they had become so developed and exerted a great deal of influence. He wanted India to learn science and technology from the West and its power to organize and its practical sense, but, at the same time, retain her high dharmic values and spiritual wealth. |Emulating such a personality is futile; if humanity can understand/comprehend and imbibe his message and teachings, that should be good enough.]

~ The Sarasvati River is an important river goddess in the Rig Ved. (~ Many of the Rig Vedic hymns mention a sacred river called SarasvatI, describing it as the foremost of rivers, big as the ocean, rising in the mountains and flowing between the Yamuna and Sutlej [Sutudri/Satadru/SuturI] before entering the sea. The Sarasvati is portrayed as "surpassing in majesty and might all other waters" and "pure in her course from mountains to the ocean.")Devi Sarasvati is intrinsically associated with flowing water in her role as a goddess of knowledge (not transient/apara vidya though; hence she holds a lotus - the symbol of true/eternal/timeless knowledge - para vidya). She is wisdom personified. ~ In the Rig Ved, Sarasvati is a river as well as its personification as a goddess. [Veda (meaning wisdom, knowledge) comes from the root "vid" - to know. Veda has in turn given rise to "Vidya", which also means: knowledge.] She is Varadey Kaamarupinee (the fulfiller of wishes) and is associated with literature, arts, crafts, music, etc. [Note: Sri Hayagriva is the male equivalent of Devi Sarasvati. Refer the passages on Lord Hayagreeva/Hayagriva: link. ~ Devi Sarasvati is symbolically known as Brahmaputri...'coz she is wisdom personified; she is considered as the embodiment/manifestation of Brhm (knowledge, learning, culture, wisdom, enlightenment, creativity, and so on); so whether Lord Hayagreeva/Hayagriva is symbolically referred to as Brahmaputra or not ~ my guess is as good as yours.) ... Devi Sarasvati represents intelligence, wisdom, consciousness, cosmic knowledge, creativity, education, culture, enlightenment, music, the arts, eloquence (persuasion/ vāk)and so on. The goddess of knowledge and arts represents the free flow of wisdom and consciousness. The Vedas (The Book of Knowledge/The Book of Enlightenment) are associated with her, and chants to her are called the 'Sarasvati Vandana Mantra' (for guidance, wisdom and knowledge: link|"May Goddess Sarasvati, who is fair like the jasmine-coloured moon, and whose pure white garland shines like (is as bright as) frosted dew drops [dew is the purest form of water]; who is adorned in radiant white attire, on whose beautiful arm rests the veena, and whose throne is a pure white lotus; who is surrounded and respected by the Gods, bless us. May the goddess fully remove our lethargy, sluggishness, and ignorance.") [Sometimes a peacock is shown beside her ~ it is imagery, implying not to be concerned with external appearance and to be wise regarding the eternal truth (Sat/Satya).] ~ It is believed that goddess Sarasvati endows humans with the powers of fine speech/vāk (persuasive powers), wisdom and learning. Her symbolic four hands represent four aspects of human personality in learning: mind, intellect, alertness and self. She plays the music of compassion, wisdom, assimilation, love and life on a string instrument called the Veena. Sarasvati is also referred to as Hamsahvahini, which means "she who has a hamsah (the swan) as her 'vehicle'". [~ She is also a prominent figure in Buddhism (Buddhist iconography). It is believed that Mahasarasvati destroyed Shumbha and Nishumbha. ~ Incidentally: Rakta-bija is mistranslated to blood-seeds, it is an allusion to entrenched negative/destructive mindset/perception et al that alters the very essence of the land/culture/people; the consequences of which are far-reaching... like a torrent, like the weed in a garden or perhaps akin to water hyacinth.] ~ Devi Sarasvati is mainly associated with the colour white (pure white), which signifies the purity of true knowledge (para vidya or eternal knowledge) as well as Sattva Guna (noble traits). (Refer the relevant passages on hamsah/swan.) Occasionally, however, she is also associated with the colour yellow (basanti), the colour of the flowers of the mustard plant that bloom at the time of her festival in the spring. [~ Pure white: Puṇḍarīka, Svetakamala or Shubhra Kamal - the metaphoric "pure white lotus". Pure white indicates pristine, embodiment of pure knowledge: kundalini (Sahasrara Chakra - the 7th Chakra, the highest Chakra). It also signifies tranquility.] 

|| AUM Ayeim Sarasvatye Namah AUM || ~ It is an invocation to the Goddess Sarasvati. 

[Note: Lord Krishn is Hamsah: The swan; Hamsah means "He with a large-hearted intelligence"; (Krishn is Trikalagya, and therefore, clear-eyed, strategic and far-thinking; he also keeps Loka-sangraha or Loka-kalyana - the greater/collective good - above himself. If e.g. Duryodhan and allies (Shakuni, Jarasandh, Dushashana, Karna et al) were to prevail what turn would the Mahabharata have taken? With what devastating consequences? ~ As the Jagat-patih - Sovereign of the Universe/Lord of Creation - he upheld Raj-dharma (the duties and responsibilities of a sovereign). [~ Krishn's was the highest dharmic mission (dharma-samsthapanarthaya - to rebuild/revive/reinvigorate/rejuvenate the principles of dharma/right action for the greater good, and karm-yog/action - to walk the talk). ~ He also advised humanity to dharma (right action - for the greater good; even selfless (nishkam/non-glory-seeking) action/service to humanity/society), collective introspection and concerted action (karm-yog) - to duty. 'Coz there is no instant results or success; it is work-in progress.] |The hamsah (swan) is supposed to possess the ability to separate the water from the cream (in milk). The hamsa's ability to separate milk and water symbolizes the need to differentiate between positive aspects and negative aspects as well as the eternal/enduring and the evanescent/ephemeral/transient. E.g: The English language, in a generic sense, was the (metaphoric/proverbial) 'amrit' that arose out of a (symbolic) 'manthan' - colonization. ~ And yet, today this language is a link language - globally. |Hamsa = a bird; either the white swan or bar-headed white goose. The white swan is called Raja-Hamsa, literally: royal swan. The Hamsa is an important element in the symbology found in Sanaatan Dharma and represents: wisdom and beauty. The Hamsa is seen as a symbol of purity (self-realization), inner detachment (dharmic freedom of nishkam/selfless/non-glory-seeking karm), divine knowledge, cosmic breath (prana) and the highest spiritual accomplishment. It is supposed to transcend the limitations of creation - for it can walk on the earth, fly in the sky (air) and swim in the water. Just as the swan or hamsa lives on water but its feathers do not get damp, similarly a Hamsan (a true "yogi" - a nishkam karm-yogi) lives in this material world full of Maya (transience), yet remains detached and is not impacted by its transient nature. A constant repetition of the word "hamso" changes it to "Soaham", which means: "That I am" or "I am He". Ham-sa when inverted reads as sa-ham, which in Sanskrit means: 'the oneness of the human (finite) and the divine (Infinite)'. ~ One who completely realizes/understands the Avyakta (nirākārā + nirguna) and the Vyakta (ākārā + saguna) form of the Brahmn/Universal Consciousness is a Siddha - self-realized.]

Hamsah Gayatri Mantra: || Aum Paramhamsaye Vidmahe, Mahahamsaye Dhimahi, Tanno Hamsah Prachodayat || ~ "OM. Let us meditate on Sri Hamsa Deva, the glorious, pure white divine swan of supreme discrimination (ability to differentiate between positive aspects and negative aspects, between the eternal and evanescent i.e. between what is necessary/important/enduring and what is transient/ephemeral/trivial.) May that great Lord in the form of a swan (hamsah), who exemplifies paramahamsas (supreme swan), blissful self-realized souls, inspire and illumine our mind and understanding."

[Note: The symbolism associated with pure white/kundalini (Ajnea centre/7th Chakra - Crown chakra or Sahasrara Chakra, the highest chakra) and golden yellow (6th Chakra - Ajna Chakra - the symbolic third eye-chakra): ~ BG 10.22: || indriyanam manas casmi bhutanam asmi cetana || ~ "Of the senses (indriyanam) I am the mind (manas); and in living beings (bhutanam) I am the living force" (cetana, consciousness.) | ~ Chakras are centers of Prāṇa, life-force, or vital energy. (These Chakras are not literal.) ~ Chakras correspond to vital points in the physical body i.e. major plexuses of arteries, veins and nerves. The 7 Chakras are the energy centers in our body in which energy flows through. ~ Kundalini (Electric Fire - symbolized by brilliant white ~ do refer the relevant passages on kundalini) is vital for all the 7 Chakras (centers of Prāṇa, life-force, or vital energy) to be fully 'awakened'. And this happens when Kundalini reaches the 7thchakra - Sahasrara/the crown chakra (the highest chakra). [~ The seventh chakra (Sahasrara) is the chakra that integrates all the chakras with their respective qualities. It is the last milestone of the evolution of human awareness. This happens when Kundalini passes through the top of the head, at the fontanel area. ... When the Kundalini reaches the Sahasrara, the metaphoric/symbolic 'lotus petals' open and enlightenment takes place.] ~ This state is also said to be the state of complete wisdom. ~ "swa" is "higher self", "asti" meaning "being", and "ka" as a suffix, so the translation (of Swastika) can be interpreted as: "being with higher self". Lord Narayan/Vishnu is also known as "Svasti": One who is the source of all auspiciousness (~ i.e. dispeller of troubles/calamity; pathfinder). ~ Do refer link - for more details on Swastika.] ~ The Sahasrara (7thChakra/highest Chakra) is the chakra of (metaphoric/symbolic) one thousand petals. Sahasrara is unique in many ways. All other chakras feature upward, pointing lotuses. In the Sahasrara, the lotuses point downward, symbolizing freedom from the mundane (i.e. a Siddha, self-realized; refer link- to know more about self-realization), and divine rain from its petals. ~ The Sahasrara chakra was not considered an in-body chakra; (earlier) it was pictured as lying atop the head. The Saharsara is considered beyond most symbolic representations, although the chakra is usually perceived as white. ~ It is often described without a seed syllable, although some sources depict it with an OM. (~ OM or AUM represents the Shabda Brahmn. It is the primeval sound - pranavah/Omkara/pranava naad - the sound of the universe itself. The Cosmic Entity [Ishvara-Ishvari] is Omswaroop - the manifestation of OM or AUM.) ~ Krishn is depicted with a symbolic 'golden disc' indicating third eye chakra (i.e. Ajna chakra or Brow Chakra, also known as the 6thchakra) - denoting spiritual guidance. A two-petalled lotus symbolizes Ajna chakra. The left petal represents the moon or the ida nadi and the right petal represents the sun or the pingala nadi - which meet the central Sushumna nadi (here nadi = channel; Sushumna nadi is one of the body's main energy channels) before rising to the crown chakra, Sahasrara (i.e. the 7th chakra/the crown chakra - the highest chakra). Within the (metaphoric) two-petalled lotus is a perfectly round circle that symbolizes the "shoonya" or the void - symbolizing the state completely devoid of ego/ahamkara. In this circle the symbol OM is written. ... 'OM' is the mantra and the symbol of ajna chakra (the third eye chakra or 6th Chakra - symbolically depicted as a 'golden disc/chakra'). ~ Sushumna awakening is part of kundalini awakening. The two additional energy channels that play an important role in our energy system are "ida" and "pingala". [And, all this probably also symbolizes the allegorical manas-sarovara.] | The integration of the 6th and 7th Chakra is the Sudarshan Chakra. (And this should also give us an idea as to what 'Krishna hurled his Sudarsahn Chakra' means.) ~ The 6th Chakra (Ajna Chakra) and the 7thChakra join within Sahasrara to create brahma-ranhdra - the transcendence of both ~ metaphorically represented by the Shiva and Shakti - the masculine and feminine. 

In literal terms, the 'samudra-manthan' tale is (also) an allegorical description of what transpires during a kundalini-awakening process. ~ *Kundalini is a latent energy that lies dormant in the spine. Upon awakening, it rises in a sensation akin to a slithering reptile, up the spinal column (Meru-danda, also represented by the [allegoric] Mt Meru [Mandar Parvat] in the story. | BG 10.23:|| meruh sikharinam aham || ~ "and of mountains I am Meru." (~ Here Mt Meru is an allegory for Sahasrara Chakra/the 7th chakra - the crown chakra/the highest chakra). |BG 10.28: sarpāṇām asmi vāsukiḥ ~ and of serpents I am Vāsuki. ~ Here Vasuki is an allegory for kundalini. | If we look at the human brain: there is the left hemisphere (side 1) and the right hemisphere (side 2)... the area in the middle is (allegorically) occupied by a 'serpent'. (~ Therefore, we can say, kundalini is 'serpent power'.) ~ Maybe, this power 'ignites' or 'illumines' the mind, in a manner of speaking; this in turn results in an immense amount of intelligence, foresight, wisdom, perception, vision, sagacity, and so on - which (then) leads to great deeds/karm. ~ Its all interconnected (yog/sanjog); therefore, kunda = "to coil or to spiral". The Kundalini (then) unites the individual consciousness with the Universal Consciousness (the finites to the Infinite). ~ This state is also said to be the state of complete wisdom. ~ "Swa" is "higher self", "asti" meaning "being", and "ka" as a suffix, so the translation (of Swastika - referlink) can be interpreted as: "being with higher self" (i.e. yog/sanjog with the Universal Consciousness.) ~ Lord Narayan is also known as "Svasti": One who is the source of all auspiciousness. (Note:Just as the morning Sun (Golden in colour) grows to brilliant white, the 'Golden disc/chakra' (6thchakra) visualized at the eyebrow centre (Ajna Chakra) rises to Ajnea center/chakra (7th chakra) and shines forth like a diamond disc/chakra. ~ This is the final state of the Kundalini 'Fire'. When this 'chakra' opens, it is deemed as the opening of the (symbolic) third eye (Ajna Chakra/6th chakra). ~ Only when humans gain enlightenment/the state of complete wisdom - eternal, pure/timeless knowledge - para vidya (~ the state of a Buddha - i.e. when the Sahasrara Chakra/the 7th Chakra - the [metaphoric/symbolic] thousand-petalled Lotus opens up fully)... the kundalini power has been fully awakened. 

*In the sacrum bone (a large, triangular bone) at the base of the spine there exists a subtle and dormant coil of spiritual energy known as the kundalini. The process of Enlightenment or in other words Self-realization involves the gentle awakening of this living and conscious energy, so that it pervades the individual's entire being. Once this occurs, an individual is no longer disconnected from the universe around them - i.e. confined inside their own head (ego, confusion, delusion, vainglory, etc) - but becomes a connected part of the greater cosmos (~ the mind is lit up, in a manner of speaking; in other words: the metaphoric dimaag ki batti is lit up - possibly depicted by the "halo"); it brings about self-knowledge and contentment - leading to Sat-cit-ānanda, the eternal bliss/spiritual ecstasy (total contentment) of "self-realization". [Sat describes an essence that is pure and timeless; cit is consciousness (awareness, sentience - the ability to feel, perceive, and comprehend or to experience. It is necessary for cognition); ānanda is absolute bliss or spiritual ecstasy.] ~ One who has achieved the eternal bliss/spiritual ecstasy (Sat-cit-ānanda) of self-realization is a Siddha - a pure/perfect being. ~ Kundalini awakening connects a human to his or her Atman (Supersoul) - which is the source of all things. This Atman is the eternal aspect of an individual's personality; when an individual become totally connected with it, such a person becomes a Buddha (the Enlightened One) - eternal and filled with pure/timeless knowledge (para vidya).]

~ Makara Sankranti (or Pongal) marks the beginning of Uttarayan. [This time of year is generally associated with Sarasvati and Vishnu - the stabilizer/preserver/maintainer aspect of the Cosmic Entity.] ~ Devi Sarasvati is shown sitting on a "pure white lotus" (Puṇḍarīka, Svetakamala or Shubhra Kamal). Pure white indicates pristine; embodiment/manifestation of pure knowledge; in other words: kundalini (Sahasrara Chakra - the 7th Chakra, the highest Chakra). It also signifies tranquility. ~ DeviSarasvati is the embodiment/symbol/manifestation of pure knowledge (kundalini). ~ She is also depicted with the hamsah (the swan; embodiment/symbol of inner "detachment"; the swan signifies nishkam/selfless karm + dharmic freedom [inner detachment] - for the greater good; a higher cause - Loka-kalyana or Loka-sangraha. Hari-Krishna/Vishnu-Krishna is also known as the Hamsah.) ~ This inner detachment (dharmic freedom) signifies a true "yogi" - hamsan. The swan/hamsahwhose feathers do not get damp despite remaining in water - is the symbol of an enlightened, higher soul (mahatmanah). ~ Selfless action (nishkam karm) does not suppress the senses, but merely sublimates them, spiritualizesthem - for a higher purpose, a greater cause; therefore, ascetic does not mean renunciation. ~ Without nishkam karm/selfless action and the dharmic freedom (inner detachment) it bestows, one cannot become a "yogi" [~ the connect/confluence (yog) between nishkam karm and dharmic freedom (inner detachment) is necessary. ~ The spirit/soulof such persons is spotless, like the swan in water or like the lotus in the muddy water (kalka).] ~ Also, there have been various scholars and other greats who have risen and shone... from modest origins. [Even the illustrious Maurya and Gupta Emperors had humble origins.]

Uttarayan is a combination of two Sanskrit words, 'uttar' meaning northward and 'ayan' meaning movement towards. It celebrates the sun-god's northward movement. ~ It was on this day that Lord Vishnu is believed to have (symbolically curbed)/buried the heads of ever-increasing negativism (euphemistically known as Asuras) under the Mandar Parvat (Mt. Meru - the central 'mountain' of the world.) So this occasion also represents the beginning of a new era. [The Hindu and Buddhist alike regard Mt Meru as the location of Shambhala. (Mt Meru: is taken as the true centre of the planet and the world's spiritual powerhouse; it is the heartbeat of whole universe, the base of spiritual consciousness, heart of divinity; it is the center of the cosmos. Its summit is believed to align to the wheeling constellation of Ursa Major, the Seven Stars that circle the Pole.) Do refer link - for more info on Kurma-avatar, samudra-manthan, Mohini-avatar, Bhasmasura, Mt Meru, Shambhala, etc. Mohini = rare, uncommon.]~ It is also believed that Ganga reached the earth from heaven on this day. [~ Now, whether this is the River Ganga that Bhagirath is believed to have brought out after clearing the terrain... thereby bringing her waters to the whole of this land - (and thus) solving the drinking water needs, etc of the populace; or whether it is the (metaphoric/allegoric) tide of the Ganga that Lord Shiva is supposed to have held in his jata(dredlocks) and (thus) become *Byomkesh - my guess is as good as yours.] Many people also conflate Makara Sankranti with the Winter Solstice (which falls on December 21/22). ~ If only the script/glyphs of various extinct civilizations could be deciphered... [Note:*Byomkesh: Another name for Lord Shiva (Sankara/Hara): it is derived from byom (sky or air) and kesh (hair). ~ Lord Shiva received into his dredlocks (jata) the Ganga - to minimize the immense impact (devastation) of her fall. (This Ganga is a metaphor; it cannot be a reference to a river per se.) ~ Perhaps it is an allegory to indicate that his actions saved/protected humanity from great misery and/or mitigated (in force or intensity) the long-term damage. Maybe, it brought about a positive change of course and lay the foundation for a new and better society to emerge.] 

BG 10.21: || jyotisam ravir amsuman || ~ "of radiance I am the radiant sun" (ravir amsuman). ... It is a reference to the majestic Sun-god [Pratyaksh-Brahmn], to the Brahmn-jyoti, as well as to ParaBrahmn/Brahmn (Universal Consciousness). Krishn is not only indicating that he is that universal Brahmn, Omswaroop; he is (also) referring to the Summer Solstice (Sanskrit: Dakshinayana - June 21/22.) [On this day even Druids celebrate. Do also refer to the Gayatri mantra. ~ Sudarshana Vasudev Dhanvantari (Narayan/Vishnu/Hari) is the Supreme Druid; he arrives to stem the 'churn'/manthan/turmoil - to stabilize and to re-energize; he administers aoushata (medicine, cure, remedy) so that human society can (gradually) regain its health and vigour. ~ Hari-Hara. Lord Shiva (Hara/Sankara) is also known as Vaidyanatha (Lord of Remedies).] ~ Dakshinayana or Pitrayana is referred to as Karka Sankraman/Sankranti. On this day, Sun enters into Karka rashi (Cancer) [Tropic of Cancer]. Dakshinayana or Karka Sankraman is a time for performing Pitru tarpan - rituals to pay respect to Pitr Devatas (ancestors), performing charitable deeds, worshipping Lord Vishnu, chanting Vishnusahasranama stotram ("the thousand names of Vishnu"), worshipping Lord Varaha (the 3rd avatar of the Dasavatara, the supreme form of Lord Vishnu/Narayan.) [Note: Vishnupadagiri is located on the Tropic of Cancer and, therefore, was a centre of astronomical studies during the Gupta era. The Iron Pillar served an important astronomical function; its early morning shadow fell in the direction of the foot of Anantasayain/Anantasayana Vishnu (in one of the panels at Udayagiri) only in the time around summer solstice (June 21/22).] ~ The Udayagiri site appears to have been guided by a highly developed astronomical knowledge. Therefore, Udayagiri in general, and the Iron Pillar location in particular, provide ample evidence of the astronomical knowledge in India around 400 CE.]

~ BG 10.35: || māsānāḿ mārga-śīrṣo 'ham ṛtūnāḿ kusumākaraḥ || ~ "Of months I am Mārgaśīrṣa [November-December], and of seasons I am spring". ~ Mrigashīrsha: Sanskrit mṛgaśiras (also spelled Mārgaśīrṣa/Mṛgaśira) - the 5th nakṣatra or lunar mansion - as used in Vedic astronomy and astrology, is the constellation Orion. The first two carana/pada (quarters) of this nakṣatra are part of Vṛṣabha Rāśior Taurus (bull). The latter half of this star belongs to Mithuna Rāśi (Gemini). Dharma is generally symbolized in Sanaatan Dharmic thought by the bull, Vrishabha. ~ And so, Lord Narayan/Vishnuis also called Vṛṣabha (the Great Bull). ~ He is Dharmadhyaksha - Lord of Dharma [Vrisha Uttamam/Supreme Dharma.] BG ~ 10.29 || yamaḥ saḿyamatām aham || ~ and among the dispensers of justice (for negative/Prarabda karma) I am Yama (the lord of dharma/final, eternal judgment.) [~ Yama does not mean Lord of Death; that is mistranslation. ~ The other Yamaraj is Devaraj Indra's Dharmaraj/law and justice minister. ~ Lord Narayan is Mahendrah (The Lord of Indra).~ The task assigned to the Devas/Higher Beings is to manage the affairs of the universe.] [Note:For Rudra-Siva, Hari-Hara, Vishnu-Rudra, and Hari-Sankara, do refer to other parts of this post. ~ The two Indus "Yogi Seals" are depicted with bullhorns - maybe indicative of Vrishaakritih (Dharma/ Vrisha Himself) as well as Dharmadhyaksha [Vrisha Uttamam/Supreme Dharma]; the three faces probably also indicate keshavah,one who is himself the three: kah Brahma, ah Vishnu and IsaShiva - Satyam-Shivam-Sundaram (refer the relevant passages on Keshavah). ~ "Yogi" is derived from "yog", not to be construed as "ascetic", but someone who has gained freedom from the mundane i.e. a Siddha; do refer to the paragraphs on Sahasrara Chakra, Ajna Chakra, Kundalini, etc [in this post] as well as self-realization: link). ~ Thus the two Indus "Yogi Seals" very likely depict Hari-Hara/Vishnu-Rudra/Hari-Sankara - possibly the presiding deity/personage of the ancient Indus Valley Civilization; do referlink- for more info on Hariyuppa or Hariyupiyah, Meluha/Meluhha, etc; the Indus Valley Civilization covered wide swathes; it was one of the oldest of civilizations, and possibly, the most ancient of all civilizations.]

[Note: Rishabha is an avatar of Lord Vishnu (i.e. the stabilizer/preserver/maintainer aspect of the Cosmic Entity). ~ Bhagvan Rishabhdev, first Jain Tirthankara Rshabha (also known as Adinath), an enlightened soul, is regarded as an incarnation of Lord Vishnu. And considering the depiction of Shri Parshvanath, whether any of the two Indus "Yogi Seals" (and/or other seals, etc) also indicate them or not ~ my guess is as good as yours. The symbol of Adinath is a Bull (Rshabha - derived from Vṛṣabha, the Great Bull) - hence he is also known as Rshabha Dev. ~ Lord Narayanis also called Vṛṣabha (the Great Bull). ~ He is Dharmadhyaksha - Lord of Dharma (Vrisha Uttamam/Supreme Dharma.)]

Sat-Satya Sundar/ Satyam-Shivam-Sundaram: ~ Sat comes from Satya; it does not mean moralism, utopian idealism etc; it means eternal (Shaashvata); it also means dharma - right actions for the greater good. Lord Narayan/Vishnu is Dharmadhyaksha - the Lord of Dharma [Vrisha Uttamam/Supreme Dharma.] He is Vrishaakritih - Dharma (Vrisha) Himself ~ symbolized by the 'thousand-horned great bull with a hundred heads'. [Dharma is generally symbolized in Sanaatan Dharmic thought by the bull (Vrishabha). ~ Lord Narayan/Vishnu/Harih is also called Vṛṣabha (the Great Bull). Therefore, though Sat/Satya-Sundar gets (mis)translated to "Truth" and "Beauty" respectively, Sat/Satya means "Ultimate Truth" ~ Supreme Dharma. ~ "Sundar" indicates auspiciousness, generosity, dharmic excellence (actions for the greater good), work ethic, workmanship, etc. ~ Lord Narayan/Vishnu is also known as "Svasti": One who is the source of all auspiciousness. [Do refer link - for more details on Swastika.] 

[Sat/Satya/Krita Yug is the time for all-round rejuvenation... including intellectual, perceptive/cognitive and spiritual awakening/transition - wherein humans reach a higher level of existence, by moving out of the inferior manas (lower mind or lower self) and into the superior manas (higher mind or Higher Self) ~ leading to a gradual transformation/awakening. Since this is work-in-progress, therefore, dharma nad karm-yog - for building/creating a better, prosperous, progressive and inclusive society.] 

The Rig Veda refers to the Orion Constellation as Mriga (The Deer). ~ The term Mṛgaśira is a composite of two Sanskrit words, mṛga meaning animal and śira meaning head or precisely, the top of the head. The names Mṛgaśira and Mārgaśīrṣa/Mṛgaśīrṣa are sometimes used interchangeably. Grammatically, Mārgaśīrṣa means "of Mṛgaśira" or "related to Mṛgaśira". Thus Mṛgaśira is the correct name of the star, while Mārgaśīrṣa is the name of the month related to Mṛgaśira, i.e, the month in which moon will be in conjuncture with the Mṛgaśira nakṣatra. [The two "Yogi Seals" - possibly indicating Hari-Hara/Vishnu-Rudra/Hari-Sankara - probably also indicate Mrigashīrsha or Mṛgaśira: Vrisha Uttamam/Supreme Dharma. ~ So much for 'Aryan Invasion Theory'.]

Agrahāyaṇa or Mārgaśīrṣa [November-December]: Since Vedic times, this month is known as Mārgaśīrṣa after the Nakṣatra (asterisms) Mṛgaśiras. [Note:The aligning of this name with the Mṛgaśiras Nakṣatra, gives rise to speculation that this name may have been given when the sun was near Orion at the time of vernal equinox, i.e. around 7000 years ago.] ~ Kālabhairava Aṣṭamī (or Kālabhairava Jayanti) falls on Kṛṣṇa Pakṣa Aṣṭamī of this month of Mārgaśīṣa. [Kāla = time; Bhairava = the Primordial Sound, the Shabda Brahmn - pranavah/Omkara/pranava naad, the sound of the universe itself; OM or AUM - is very auspicious.] On this day it is said that Lord Śiva appeared on earth in the manifestation (avatāra) as Śrī Kālabhairava. [Kāla or kaalah = time; the bull/ Vrishabha is also associated with Lord Shiva. Thus he too is Vrisha Uttamam/Supreme Dharma.] ~ And so, Hari-Hara, Hari-Sankara, Vishnu-Rudra are not three different personages/entities... but Hari as Hara/Sankara/Rudra. ~ And thus, it is Hari-Hara, Hari-Sankara or Vishnu-Rudra. Bhairava = the Primordial Sound, the Shabda Brahmn - pranavah/Omkara/pranava naad, the sound of the universe itself. Vishnu-Krishna is the manifestation (Omswaroop) of OM or AUM. ~ Hariom. || Hari OM Tat Sat || ~ Hari OM is the Ultimate Truth (Sat). ~ The seen (manifested/vyaktah/Saakar Brahmn) and the unseen (unmanifested/avyaktah/Niraakar Brahmn) are both one. | HA= sky, RA= fire, I= energy. HARI = effulgent omnipresent omniconscient (sarvajno; possessing all wisdom) cosmic energy [ParaBrahmn]. Hari also means: Lord of Nature/Earth. OM or AUM is used for both Hari and Hara.]

[Note: Inside the great pyramids sun god Osiris is Orion (Mṛgaśira); Isis is Sirius (the brightest star as seen from Earth, apart from the sun); Horus is the Falcon-god or the Falcon-headed man. (Refer:link.)Here it probably is a reference to the Eagle Nebula. ~ There is a possibility though that Ramesses II (referred as Ramesses the Great), ancientMiṣr/Egypt's most prolific ruler, often regarded as the greatest, most celebrated, and most powerful pharaoh of the (ancient) Egyptian Empire, is named after Shri Ram. Ramesses is anglicized; it could be a variant of Ram-Ashish (due to change in phonetics. Referlink-for more info on ancient Miṣr.]

BG 10.37: || vṛṣṇīnāḿ vāsudevo 'smi|| ~ "Among the Vrishnis I am Vasudev" (Varshneya; the Lord of Mathura and Dvarka) | Here Krishn is introducing himself. ~ He is Dvarkadheesh Krishn - Sudarshan Vasudev Krishn. [~ Vasudev was the name of his father. But Vasudev also means: Lord/Protector of the Earth.]

BG 10.31: || pavanaḥ pavatām asmi rāmaḥ śastra-bhṛtām aham || ~ "I am the wind among the purifiers, and Shri Ram among the warriors."| ~ pavanaḥ pavatām asmi ~ "I am the wind among the purifiers": He is essentially saying that he is the personification of spring. ~ Wind (vayu) is one of the five elements of nature (Sanskrit: [maha]panchabhuta/PanchaMahaBhuta or Pancha Bhuta). The others being: agni (fire), water (jal), earth (prthvi) and aether (aakash, space). ~ Lord Shiva - the Hara aspect (also known as: Rudra/Sankara/Hara/Shambhu Nath) is also called Bhoota/Bhuta Nath - Lord/Protector of Mankind (living beings = bhutanam). ~ The Hari aspect means Lord of Nature. ~ Thus, Hari-Hara/Vishnu-Rudra/Hari-Sankara is not two different persons, but two aspects of Hari-Krishna. | Shivah is not destroyer-destroyer. This aspect (i.e. the Shiva/Sankara/Rudra/Hara aspect) of Hari-Krishn indicates: destroyer/dispeller of troubles/calamities/Sankat - of humanity/human society, as well as dispeller/destroyer of ego/vanity/vainglory, ignorance, illusion, delusion, confusion, 'toxin' (~ thus he is known as Neelkanth - the allegorical 'blue-throated one'; he soaks up negativism - for the good of humanity/society - to enable it to function (progress and prosper), and so on. | Lord Shiva [the Hara aspect] is regarded as a kind herdsman (shepherd) of jiva-souls (jiva or humans), while Hari-Krishna (or rather the Hari aspect) is also known as Govind - the (allegoric/metaphoric) shepherd to his flock. Hari/Hara/Hare = Dispeller [Haran] of Troubles/Calamity/Sankat - of humanity/human society/civilization; a Pathfinder through tortuous events/circumstances/paths. |'Bhoota' as in 'spirits' is very likely a much recent association ~ my guess is as good as yours. Therefore, aspects like ash smearing, chillum smoking, etc is (probably) courtesy the many cultic movements that sprang up in his name (maybe led by Gorakhnathji, etc) - in the last millennium or so ~ my guess is as good as yours. But then, the way Lord Shiva - the Hara aspect - (also known as: Rudra/Sankara/Hara/Shambhu Nath)is depicted is largely allegorical. [~ Gorakh is probably derived from the name of some Parvat/Mountain or maybe Hill.]

|| rāmaḥ śastra-bhṛtām aham || ~ "and Shri Ram among the warriors." [Here, warrior = reformer, protector, preserver, stabilizing and re-energizing force - for a better/progressive, prosperous, and inclusive society. ~ Shri Ram was a Cakravartin and steadfast reformer, not perfunctory; thus his contribution was not transient. He also upheld Raj-dharma. Krishn was a Cakravartin (by dint of his actions/karm; he too upheld Raj-dharma.) ~ Do read link- for more details on Cakravartin, Pavan-putra Hanumanji, Shiv-dhanu, etc. ~ A Cakravartin-raja is a 'wheel-turning ruler' - considered a wise, progressive, inclusive and ideal ruler, since he upholds Raj-dharma. ~ Here wheel or chakra refers to Sudarshana Chakra - the 6th Chakra (symbolic Golden chakra/disc) also known as Ajna Chakra or Brow Chakra - the third-eye chakra ~ denoting spiritual guidance, and the Sahasrara (~ the 7th chakra/the crown chakra - the highest chakra). [~ Note: Do read the paragraphs on Ajna Chakra/Brow Chakra, Shasrara and Kundalini.]

BG 10.22: || indriyanam manas casmi bhutanam asmi cetana || ~ "Of the senses (indriyanam) I am the mind (manas); and in living beings (bhutanam) I am the living force" (cetana, consciousness; consciousness and conscience are two different things; consciousness (cetana) is awareness, sentience - the ability to feel, think, perceive, comprehend or to experience. It is necessary for cognition/perception. ~ Here, living force (cetana) is essentially a reference to kundalini energy (spiritual energy; conscious energy). Do read the relevant passages on Kundaliniand Sahasrara Chakra.) | ~ *So, this should give us an idea as to what Karna's "kavacha" and "kundal" means. [~ Krishna would have impacted Karna's ability to perceive and comprehend, and thus, his capacity to think clearly.] | So, does it also mean that he can control the mind? ~ Hari-Hara is one and the same, two different aspects, not two different entities. (Do read the relevant passages - to understand this.) | ~ Shivah means: the kindly auspicious one; he is a kind herdsman (shepherd) of jiva-souls (jiva or humans.) ~ If they lack direction, he guides them, shows them the way; a pathfinder. ~ The Hari aspect of Keshavah (refer relevant passages) is also a shepherd: Govind - the (allegoric/metaphoric) shepherd to his flock. ~ The Shivah/Hara (aspect) does not mean destroyer per se; this aspect (i.e. the Shiva/Sankara/Rudra/Hara aspect - do also read the relevant paragraphs) of Hari-Krishn indicates: destroyer/dispeller of troubles/calamities/Sankat of humanity/human society + dispeller/destroyer of ego/vanity/vainglory, ignorance, illusion, delusion, confusion. [Do also read about the Vamana-avatar: link.] ~ He is also Neelkanth (the allegorical 'blue-throated one') - who soaks up 'halahala' or 'kaalkoot' (resulting out of immense societal 'manthan'/churn/'dark clouds/negativism/pessimism that engulf the hearts and minds') - for the benefit of human society/mankind ~ to enable it to "heal" (the Hari aspect is also Dhanvantari, while the Hara aspect is Vaidyanatha - Supreme Druid/Lord of Remedies) - so that it can evolve/transform and function better, i.e. progress and prosper. 

[Note: *Karna's "kavacha" and "kundal" and what could be meant by Karna's 'chariot wheel sank deep into the ground'. [Literally: Karna = ears. Kundal = ear-ring; though it is probably derived from "kundalini" (refer the relevant passages on Kundalini, Sahasrara Chakra).] | As per the narrative, Karna's 'chariot wheel sank deep into the ground' at a crucial time; he was, thus, unable to recollect the 'mantra' (appropriate incantations) for unleashing certain weaponry. ~ This 'chariot wheel' is not literal. Wheel = cakra or chakra, and (very likely) refers to Karna's mind chakra or Manasa Chakra, which is connected with most of the head (especially the brain), is a combination of sensing and intellect. [Maybe, only by weakening of Karna's "kundal"... could this unnatural human, ('son' of Lord Surya, a higher being, and Kunti ~ begotten through very advanced genetic engineering) be rendered inactive; otherwise nothing else could affect him (~ as indicated by the "kavacha" - that was part of his genetic makeup.) Hence, Karna could never have donated either his "kaavacha" or his "kundaal". Ever. [~ Perhaps, later-day translators, unable to understand the technology aspects described in the narrative, improvised by bringing in Brahmin's 'curse', Parasurama's 'curse', Sutaputra, fate, and so on. ~ There was no concept of Brahmin in Dvapar; it was Brahmana - indicating erudition. Also, there were three kinds of warriors; the Suta, though highly skilled, did not pick up weapons.) A renowned "kusalavya" of that era was Ugrasrava, son of Lomarsana, known as Sauti to one and all. Sauti is derived from "Suta". Kusalavya (roughly translates to) a wandering poet; they were greatly respected. Even Sanjay was held in high esteem.] Therefore, Karna's 'chariot wheel sank deep into the ground' could mean: his memory weakened. ~ Krishn, perhaps made this happen (via some sort of mind-control/'inception'); as a Purna Avatar he possessed 16 qualities.| Apparently - and perhaps realizing his condition - Karna invoked the Arya dharmic tenets of "fair play" and "chivalry"... perhaps in a bid to buy time (maybe to get himself treated; to [symbolically/metaphorically] 'pull out his chariot wheel that had sunk deep into the ground', that is.) | Krishn then (sarcastically) asked him whether he ever walked on the path of Arya Dharma and followed "fair play" and/or displayed "chivalry". Krishn further reminded Karna about the latter's role during the fraudulent game of dice (that cheated the Pandavas out of their right and banished them for 13 long years instead); his willing participation in the various machinations against the Pandavas; his conduct when Draupadi was insulted, and when Kunti was treated shabbily, etc. ~ Krishn further said that Karna's demand for a fair chance was disgusting, since as an ally and co-conspirator of Duryodhan, he was not only privy to, but was also a willing partner of, all of the latter's heinous deeds. [BG 10.29 || yamaḥ saḿyamatām aham || ~ "and among the dispensers of justice (for negative/Prarabda karma) I am Yamah/Dharmaraj" (the lord of dharma - final and/or eternal judgment.) |Krishn very clearly states that he is the Supreme Judge ~ and thus will deliver his judgement on prarabdha karma (negative karma) and/or provide an opportunity for redemption. ~ In his conversations with Karna, Krishn is actually spelling out his judgement ~ as Dharmadhyaksha - Supreme Dharma.] | With Karna rendered inactive, Duryodhan was greatly weakened, so much so that the course of the greatest of dharma-yuddha (battle of ideas, principles, inclusivity, progress and vision - for the future of humanity/human society) was clear to one and all.]

BG 10.31: || srotasām asmi jāhnavī || ~ "and of flowing waters I am the Ganga." [~ Pratyaksha/Manifest-Brahmn is the Sun-god (Suryadev). The confluence of the Ganga, Yamuna and the mythic Sarasvati is known as Prayag - Triveni Sangam. ~ Tagore said: shab patho eshe miley gyalo shheshe tomaro dukhani nayone nayone. (Dorefer the relevant passages on the Sahasrara Chakra, Ajna Chakra, kundalini, etc.)]

BG 9.11: || avajānanti māḿ mūḍhā mānuṣīḿ tanum āśritam paraḿ bhāvam ajānanto mama bhūta-maheśvaram || ~ "The ignorant deride Me when I descend in the human form. They do not know (are unaware of) My transcendental nature as the Supreme Lord (maheśvaram) of all that be."| ~ Thus he is Rishikesha - one who has not only gained mastery over his own senses (indriyas), but also over those of others. |avajānanti māḿ mūḍhā (The ignorant deride Me when I descend in the human form): Is this an indication that he puts on a veneer? ~ My guess is as good as yours. | [Note: ~ 'Avatar' means descent, and refers to a descent of the divine into earthly form. Avatar comes from the Sanskrit avatirna: "manifest/descent from the Lord." ~ However, though in their human forms they possess certain qualities. The 7th Vishnu possesses 12. While the 8th Vishnu (Keshavah himself) possesses all 16; thus he is Lord Narayan's Purna Avatar (one in whom divinity is manifested fully.) | The Sudarshan Chakra is associated with Krishn/Keshavah. ~ (Do read the paragraphs on Sudarshan Chakra, Kundalini, Sahasrara, etc.) ~ He is also known as Sudarshan Vasudev Krishn. [~ Here is Tagore's Heye Khaniker Atithi: link.]

BG 4.5: śrī-bhagavān uvāca (Sri Bhagavan said): || bahūni me vyatītāni janmāni tava cārjuna tāny ahaḿ veda sarvāṇi na tvaḿ vettha parantapa || ~ "O Arjun, many are the lives I have passed through and thou too. But I know them all, whilst thou knowest not."

BG 7.26: || vedaham samatitanivartamanani carjunabhavisyani ca bhutani mam tu veda na kascana || ~ "O Arjun, I know everything that has happened in the past, all that is happening in the present, and all things that are yet to come. I also know all living entities; but Me no one knows." ~ Thus Krishn was all-knowing (Trikalagya). He also knew each soul (individual or human soul/jiva-atma).

BG 10.30: || mṛgāṇāḿ ca mṛgendro 'haḿ vainateyaś ca pakṣiṇām || ~ "among animals I am the lion, and among birds I am Garuḍa."| Lord Narayan is Garuda-Dhvaja; Garuda is His insignia, as well as 'vehicle'; it also indicates eagle or maybe falcon.

BG 10.28: || dhenūnām asmi kāmadhuk || ~ "among cows I am the surabhi" (also known as kamadhenu - the wish-fulfilling cow ~ possibly a metaphor for prosperity, etc.)

BG 10.33: || akṣarāṇām a-kāro 'smi dvandvaḥ sāmāsikasya ca ahamevākṣayaḥ kālo dhātāhaḿ viśvato-mukhaḥ || ~ "Of letters I am the letter A (referlink). And among compound words I am the dual compound (maybe a reference to hydrogen-oxygen bonds present in water. Refer link- for Dvarka.)I am also inexhaustible time (Kaalah; Kālah/kālo = time; Bhairava = the Primordial Sound, the Shabda Brahmn - pranavah/Omkara/pranava naad, the sound of the universe itself; OM or AUM - this sound is auspicious), and of creators I am Brahmā" (a metaphor for rejuvenation, regeneration, reinvigoration; also refer the passages on Keshavah.)

BG 10.34: || mṛtyuḥ sarva-haraś cāham udbhavaś ca bhaviṣyatām || ~ "I am all-consuming time, and I am the generating principle/cause/energy of all that is yet to be." (~ Alternatively: "I am all-consuming time, and I am too the birth of all that shall come into being.") 

BG 10.40: || nānto 'sti mama divyānāḿ vibhūtīnāḿ parantapa eṣa tūddeśataḥ prokto vibhūter vistaro mayā || ~ "There is no end of My divine manifestations, O Arjun. What I have spoken to you is but a mere indication of My infinite manifestations." [~ Perhaps it also means that the universe/cosmos is not monolithic. The Peepal tree (Ashvatha) represents the entire cosmos: 'Shva' in Sanskrit means tomorrow, 'a' indicates negation, and 'tha' means one that stands or remains. ~ Thus, Ashvatha can also indicate: "One which does not remain the same tomorrow", or the universe itself. ~ Maybe there is no stagnation. BG: 10.26 || aśvatthaḥ sarva-vṛkṣāṇāḿ || ~ among trees, I am the peepal (ashvattha).] |Lord Narayan/Vishnu/Hari's Purna Avatar (one in whom divinity is manifested fully) is Shri Hari-Krishna. ~Lord Krishna is considered as the Cosmic Person/Being in his totality of manifestation. He is not an Avatar of the Cosmic Person/Being, but is considered as the Cosmic Person/Being Himself (albeit, in human form; all the avatars come in their human manifestation). || krishnas tu bhagavan svayam || ~ He is the Cosmic Teacher and Cosmic Ruler; as a leela-avatar - he (also) holds a mirror to humanity; he instructs and assesses humanity (whether they can differentiate between positive aspects and negative aspects, between the eternal and evanescent i.e. what is necessary/important and what is transient/trivial [like the swan/hamsah]; comprehension (thought process), perspective and cognitive abilities, karm-yog, mettle, and so on) - to awaken them into introspection and collective karm-yog; and so, he leads by example and instructs through his own behaviour (acharan) - the mark of a true teacher/guru/mentor. | He is God manifest in human form (svayam Bhagavan, the human manifestation [sagun swaroop] of Lord Vishnu/Narayan - His Purna Avatar.) | Leela is the interplay/synergy (yog) between the finite and Infinite, between created and Uncreated, between evanescent and Eternal.

BG 10.26: || aśvatthaḥ sarva-vṛkṣāṇāḿ|| ~ "among trees, I am the peepal (ashvattha)" ~ Shri Narayan/Keshavah/Vishnu, the Lord of the Universe (symbolically) dwells in the roots of this tree, Keshavah in the trunk, Narayan dwells in the branches, Shri Hari in the leaves and all the deities dwell in the fruits of this sacred tree. The peepal tree is (therefore) the personification of Shri Narayan/Vishnu. |The peepal tree (the Bodhi tree/the 'tree of enlightenment') or the transpersonal World Tree is the personification of Shri Vishnu/Keshavah/Narayan/Hari. The Bodhi tree, the Tree of Enlightenment, is also the symbol of (the 9th Vishnu) Shri Gautam Buddh's message in general (since he had overcome his human boundaries and become one with the world spirit.) ~ The peepal (ashvattha) is the tree of eternal life. This sacred tree stands for wisdom, knowledge, enlightenment, happiness, prosperity, peace and good luck. Every peepal tree is a reservoir of oxygen. People who stay near it have a plentiful supply of oxygen. This majestic tree gives ample shade to humans and animals alike. It is also home to a lot of birds and insects. The holy fig tree has medicinal properties as well. In Sanskrit, this tree is known as Ashvattha, Bodhivriksha and Plaksha. This tree represents the entire cosmos. [Note: in some of the old Indus sites, clay objects with peepal leaf markings have been unearthed. There are seals depicting the peepal leaf. ~ And, all this shows that the peepal tree has been worshipped from very early times. So much for 'Aryan Invasion Theory.' ~ Sometimes the holy fig tree is taken as the Banyan tree (Vata Vrikhsha). ~ (Refer the relevant passages - for more details on Chakravartin and 'Cakravartin system of governance/administration').]

BG 10.42: || idaḿ kṛtsnam ekāḿśena sthito jagat || ~ "I continually support the entire universe/cosmos by a small fraction of My divine power (YogMaya)." ~ Therefore, the manifest creation (Prakriti/Manifest Nature or Material Nature) is a very small fraction of the Absolute (Cosmic Purusha/Cosmic Energy). [~ "When I read the Bhagavad-Gita and reflect about how God created this universe everything else seems so superfluous." ~ Albert Einstein. |"One infinite pure and holy - beyond thought beyond qualities I bow down to thee" - Swami Vivekananda.]

BG 2.13:|| dehino 'smin yatha dehe kaumaram yauvanam jara tatha dehantara-praptir dhiras tatra na muhyati || ~ "As the embodied soul continuously passes, in the material body, from childhood to youth to old age, the soul similarly transmigrates from one body to another. The self-realized or the temperate (dhirah = the temperate) is not bewildered/deluded by such a change."

BG 2.22|| vāsānsi jīrNāni yathā vihāya navāni grihNāti naro.aparāNi tathā śarīrāNi vihāya jīrNānyanyāni sanyāti navāni dehī || ~"Just as a human being puts on new garments, casting off old and worn-out ones, the (human) soul (Jiva-atma) similarly takes up residence within new material bodies, giving up the old and infirm ones." [~ The "First Law of Thermodynamics" (Conservation) states that energy is always conserved; it cannot be created or destroyed. In essence, energy can be converted from one form into another. ~ 'Energy can be changed from one form to another, but it cannot be created or destroyed. The total amount of energy and matter in the Universe remains constant, merely changing from one form to another.'| ~ Soul is energy; it has no form or gender; only the outer shell (material body) differs. [~ For humans, there is no guarantee that the soul (jiva-atma) won't transmigrate as (e.g.) an animal, bird, and so on. It all depends on one's karma. The only certain way to come out of this Samsara or the constant cycle of birth and re-birth (transmigration) - is by performing copious amounts of good karma (nishkam/selfless/non-glory-seeking karma). Good/positive karma is essential to "wash off" any (carried over) Prarabda karma (negative karma); this in turn gives the jiva/atma (human soul) a clean slate and/or a positive amount (remainder) of good karma.] ~ Krishn not only associates himself with trees and plants... but also with animals, aquatic creatures, birds, etc. ~ Perhaps to indicate that as the manifestation of the universal Brahmn/Universal Consciousness (and Creator/Sraasta) he does not discriminate. That, for the manifestation of the Param-atma (Supreme Cosmic Spirit), there is no distinction between differing material bodies. The Universal Form of the One encompasses everything. [~ Swami Vivekananda imbibed and conveyed this essence succinctly: || Bohu-rupe sammukhe tomar aami, kotha khunjichho Ishvar? Jibe prem kare jei jan, Shei jan shebichhe Ishvar || ~ Service to mankind (not restricted to humanity alone) is service to God. That is true worship. ~ This, to Vivekananda, was the path to self-realization (or Param-atma realization); it was his path to direct communion with the truth (eternal truth/Sat/Satya)... leading to the eternal bliss/spiritual ecstasy of self-realization: Sat-cit-ānanda. [Sat describes an essence that is pure and timeless; cit is consciousness (awareness, sentience - the ability to feel, perceive, and comprehend or to experience. It is necessary for cognition); ānanda is absolute bliss or spiritual ecstasy. |Our ancients too very likely understood this concept. ~ And so, the Devi Mahatmyam ('The Magnanimity of the Goddess'/ also known as the Sri Sri chandipATh)says: || Srsstti-Sthiti-Vinaashaanaam Shakti-Bhuute Sanaatani | Gunna-[A]ashraye Gunnamaye Naaraayanni Namo[ah-A]stu Te ||9|| ~ 9.1: (Salutations to You O Narayani) In Whom is Present the Power of Creation, Maintenance/Preservation and Dissolution and Who is Eternal, |9.2: Who is the Supportof the Gunas (all noble aspects, attributes) and the Embodiment of the Gunas; Salutations to You O Narayani. | Srsstti-Sthiti-Vinaashaanaam: the Powerof Creation, Maintenance/Preservation and Dissolution: Brahma-Vishnu-Shivah/Rudra. | Narayan-Narayani. Ishvar-Ishvari. Parameshvar-Parameshvari. Jagadishvar-Jagadishvari. Tribhuvaneshvar-Tribhuvaneshvari. The duality. ... And, perhaps, this duality gave rise to the concept of ArdhaNarishvara. It is not literal, though. | Here is Tagore's 'Pratham Adi taba Shakti': link01.] 

~ It does seem that Tagore incorporated this concept in our National Anthem. Here is the complete five stanza of Tagore's "Jana-Gana-Mana Adhinayaka..." (ruler/leader/captain of the minds of all people): link.|[Note: Controversy shadowed Jana Gana Mana Adhinayaka from the day of its first rendition in 1911 at the Congress session in Calcutta. King George V arrived in India the day the song was first sung... and sections of the Anglo-Indian English press in Calcutta thought - and duly reported - that Tagore's anthem was homage to the emperor. ~ Tagore responded thus: "I should only insult myself if I cared to answer those who consider me capable of such unbounded stupidity." He later wrote, "A certain high official in His Majesty's service, who was also my friend, had requested that I write a song of felicitation towards the Emperor. The request simply amazed me. It caused a great stir in my heart. In response to that great mental turmoil, I pronounced the victory in Jana Gana Mana of that Bhagya Vidhata [ed. Lord of Destiny] of India who has from age after age held steadfast the reins of India's chariot through rise and fall, through the straight path and the curved. That Lord of Destiny, that Reader of the Collective Mind of India, that Perennial Guide, could never be George V, George VI, or any other George. Even my official friend understood this about the song. After all, even if his admiration for the crown was excessive, he was not lacking in simple common sense."]

..................................................................... 

~ Lord Krishn (do also refer link)is a most extraordinary figure: resilient, diligent (work ethic), incredibly charismatic, effortlessly cool (unpretentious, though he does not come across as someone who might have suffered fools, gladly or otherwise; not to be construed as rude or boorish though); an inspirational leader, a pathfinder, a nation-builder, a hero (due to his karm and wisdom), a strategist, sagacious and farsighted, a far-thinker, possessed plenty of guile and gumption no matter how daunting the issues and challenges confronting the respective eras/humanity/society, a Cakravartin (by dint of his actions/karm-yog; do refer link - for more details on Chakravartin and 'Cakravartin system of governance/administration'), a legend, an enlightening personage, a guiding spirit, a karm-yogi (man of action: ability to walk the talk, not workaholic), a transformational/renaissance figure (Yug Purush/Renaissance man), God manifest in human form (svayam Bhagavan, the 8th Vishnu; the human manifestation [sagun swaroop] of Lord Vishnu/Narayan, His Purna Avatar)... and yet, an everyman. ~ Awesomeness. He is truly a rockstar of the ineffable. He's also a Soldier-Statesman-par-excellence (soldier against pessimism, confusion, decay and so on). He was up against tremendous odds; [dharma is not abstract moralism, and the like] ~ sermons would have had no effect on the likes of Shakuni, Duryodhan et al (who, along with their allies, not only wielded a great amount of clout, but also played with loaded dice - literally and figuratively. So, it was a veritable David against Goliath, in a manner of speaking.) [... One can truly understand him and the magnitude of his karm - only in one's mind's eye.] Each era/age/yug is distinct. Viewing them through the prism of another will be misleading. ~ The challenges at the end of Dvapar were manifold, and very different from those of Treta; humanity was different - their mindset, worldview, (perceptive and cognitive abilities) were different, ethical and social conditions were not the same either. Decay, indifference/impassiveness, inertia et al had set in. ~ Krishn's was the highest dharmic mission - right action for the greater good (not to be construed for moralism, etc - he was the catalyst for positive change; he stemmed the slide into quagmire); and by his very appearance (karm-yog + guidance), he reinvigorated/re-energized the principles of dharma (duty/action, even selfless action, for the benefit of humanity, for the greater good - to build a better society: dharma-samsthapanarthaya); he also urged (advised) humanity to (collective) introspection and action (karm-yog) - to duty. [Dharma is not quite ethics or duty alone, since dharma does not exist in a vacuum/void; it also means  a constructive 'way of life' i.e. actions/karm - for the larger good. It goes hand-in-hand with karm-yog.] ... Krishn advised humanity to shake-off inertia and embrace karm-yog. [There is no magic wand; thus, he also led by example and instructed through his own behaviour (acharan) - the mark of a true teacher/guru/mentor (but then, besides being the Cosmic Ruler, he is also the Cosmic Teacher); this aspect/dynamism remains constant, be it the Ramayana ('The Exertions of Shri Ram'/ Shri Ram was a Reformer-Prince and Cakravartin) or the Mahabharata ('The Great History of the Bharatas').

~ Shri Krishn is a Soldier-Statesman, but a Cakravartin (do referthe relevant passagesfor more details on Cakravartinand 'Cakravartin system of governance/administration') by dint of his actions/karm; his actions were for a higher cause - Loka-kalyana or Loka-sangraha - the greater/collective good. | As a pathfinder his focus, tenacity and determination remains unwavering, he keeps the goals/objectives above himself. He was not amongst humans to become emperor himself. He is perennial guide. [Here is the complete five stanza of Tagore's "Jana-Gana-Mana Adhinayaka..."(ruler/leader/captain of the minds of all people)... who has (in Tagore's own words) from age after age held steadfast the reins of India's chariot through rise and fall, through the straight path and the curved. That Lord of Destiny, that Reader of the Collective Mind of India, that Perennial Guide... is none other than the eternal charioteer (perennial guide): link.] ... There is no alternative to cumulative karm-yog (collective action/duty/responsibility, even selfless/non-glory-seeking action/service to humanity/society) - to create/build [and sustain] a better (i.e. progressive, prosperous and inclusive) society/civilization. This is his message/advise/mantra. ~ One needs to contemplate and deliberate deeply - to understand his purpose, his karmand his message/advise. Only then it will percolate.] ~ Instead of being active participants in their own destiny, humanity cannot become idlers and mere spectators/bystanders. ~ That will lead to a gradual all-round degeneration/degradation. This is the core of his message. (... Thus, there is an organic interplay [yog] between finites and Infinite. ~ Karm-yog is the channel to establish this connection/yog; to unite our individual consciousness with the Universal Consciousness - the Jiva-atma/finites to the Param-aatma/Infinite.) ~ Krishn is the Perennial Guide - the (allegoric/metaphoric) shepherd to his flock. ~ There is no magic wand, no quick-fix, no instant solution; humanity will have to sort out their own issues - through collective effort, there is no one "out there" (a messiah figure) who will come and do it. They (avatars/empowered entities, maha-avatars/great incarnations and Purna Avatar - one in whom divinity is manifested fully) will guide and show the way - yes, however, there is no alternative to sustained karm-yog. ~ This has been the message of the Krishn-avatar (the 8th Vishnu). And this has also been the message of the Buddh-avatar (the 9th Vishnu). [Prince Siddhartha/Shri Gautam Buddh - the 'Enlightened One' - was a Sage-Prince. He traveled widely; instead of isolating himself in some remote corner, he remained within society, engaged with the people (answered their queries, cleared their many doubts and confusions) and thus, disseminated his message of peace/co-existence, karm-yog (karma) and dharma (dhamma). Apart from being a fine teacher (guru/mentor) and guide, he was also a reformer. ~ Now whether he left his family in the wake of his quest for the 'truth' (dharma/dhamma, actions that benefit society) or met them whenever he could (i.e. whenever he could make time from all the traveling, sermons, meditation, and so on) - my guess is as good as yours.] ~ Krishn (the 8th Vishnu) also 'closed' Dvapar... and navigated through complex/tortuous paths/events/situations to bring about the transition from Dvapar to Kaliyug (Kali means bud/flower)... which commenced from midnight of 18 February in 3102 BC in the proleptic Julian calendar. (Maybe from the confluence/conjunction of 17/18 February 3102 BC i.e. midnight onwards.) [This is because he departed on this date. The period after his departure marks the beginning of Kaliyug. (Lord Narayan/Harih/Vishnu is the motive power and guiding spirit behind the mathematically precise universe. So, one can only wonder at the clockwork fashion/precision (work ethic) with which His maha-avatars work.) ~ Kali means bud/flower. Thus, Krishn was also a stabilizing factor (a preserver) - a catalyst for positive change, as well as a revitalizing entity (Renaissance Man/Yug Purush; he was the cause/catalyst that ushered in a new era/age/yug through circuitous/complex/tortuous events - by stemming the tide/slide into quagmire/'quicksand'.) ~ Only at the end of Kaliyug, when the metaphoric bud/flower withers away, the negative aspects of Kaliyug - i.e. the ghor Kaliyug phase/ the 'Iron Age' of ignorance/stagnation/decay will be at its peak: cognitive abilities fall, intellectual faculties dim, comprehension/perception level is enveloped by a (symbolic) 'fog' of ignorance, apathy/indifference, delusion, stagnation, and so on; hence, it (the end of Kaliyug, that is) is (also) called the most degenerate of all ages/yugs). [Note: A cycle of four yugs (Chatur-Yug) - whose lengths follow a ratio of 4:3:2:1 is also known as a 'Maha-Yug' viz. Sat/Satya/Krita [the metaphoric Golden Age; the age of renewal/resurgence: prosperity, progress, wisdom, intellectual and spiritual illumination, and so on], Treta [Silver Age], Dvapar [Copper Age] and Kaliyug (Kali means bud/flower, but the end of Kaliyug is termed as ghor Kaliyug phase/'Iron Age' of ignorance/stagnation/decay; this 'Iron Age' is a negative term). ~ A Maha-Yug (four-yug cycle) follows a ratio of 4:3:2:1 - hence Kaliyug is the shortest of all yugs.] 

[Note: Dharma is not straight and narrow; it is not abstract moralism or utopian/impractical idealism; it is not quite ethics, principles or duty alone - 'coz dharma does not exist by itself in a vacuum/void; dharma means rightactions that lead to the greater/collective good - towards a better, prosperous and progressive society/civilization. It is not instant; it is collective/cumulative work-in-progress.  ... Dharma is connect (yog) between action/duty and its outcome. ~ Thus, dharma goes hand-in-hand with karm-yog (collective/cumulative work-in-progress). 

~ Karm-yog does not mean self-help. ... The conjunction/confluence of "karm" and "yog" indicate connect (yog/sanyog) i.e. sustained and cumulative or composite effort. Imbibing the spirit of dharma (right, tangible action for the greater good with the dharmic freedom of inner detachment/non-glory-seeking) and karm-yog is necessary. A combined/concerted/aggregate effort is sustainable; it also brings about positive organic change. Else it is unproductive. 

Each era/age/yug is distinct; viewing them through the prism of another will be misleading. E.g. one cannot quite compare Treta to Dvapar. ~ Treta is known as Silver Age, while Dvapar is called Copper Age - since there is a quarterly decline in dharmic principles, attitudes, value system, thought process, and so on and karm-yog (collective duty/right action - for the greater good). ~ And, all of this affects human society: social conditions, dynamics, mindset, perception, perspective, and so on... which in turn affects/shapes the worldview. Thus, comprehension/perceptive/cognitive abilities  too undergo a corresponding change; and so, a corresponding amount of ignorance, decay and so on sets in (gradually, that is - with the passage of each era/yug. ~ Thus, the end of Kaliyug - euphemistically called the ghor Kaliyug phase or 'Iron Age' of ignorance/confusion/stagnation/decay - is the lowest phase of all; it is therefore regarded as the most degenerate of all ages/yugs/phases).

Krishn navigated through (a maze of) shifting power centers, tortuous events, intrigues, smokescreen, choppy waters, parochialism, 'cross-currents', politics, diplomacy, and so on... armed with only his brilliance ('Sudarshan Chakra'), his clear-sightedness/acumen, his wise counsel and his charm: observing, evaluating, assessing, networking, negotiating - sometimes with a gentle force of persuasion, (maybe even throwing in some platitudes or praise as and when required. It's all part of Dandaniti.) ~ He used his overpowering wisdom and intelligence in the struggle for supremacy, resulting finally in the re-establishment of a good phase/upward trajectory (the subduing/subjugation of assorted negative elements + their actions) and of right (the Pandavas and their allies) over wrong (Duryodhan and his allies). [He (thus) stemmed the slide into quagmire; he prevented events from spiraling out of control.] The tremendous political acumen of Krishn is highlighted in the way he used all the four principles of Dandaniti to destroy the malignant power centers, create new alliances that emerged as counter balances to the existing power structure and used diplomacy to bolster what was right. He used his basic superior intelligence for this one purpose. It took some time. It also took some effort (obviously, 'coz there's no quick fix, no magic wand - to bring about instant organic change to a myriad of challenges/issues). ~ But in the final analysis, he emerged as the leader whose judgment and veracity could not be disputed. His political acumen combined with his sharp intellect and personal courage established him as a major force. |Krishn comes across as pleasant, affable; regal - maybe, but sorted and approachable; he exudes a quite confidence and gravitas without breaking a sweat; he is on the ball, far-thinking and decisive... though not 'rigid rigid'/intransigent. That would be folly, not strategic. Instead, he comes across as 'savvy flexible'... a tactic sometimes necessary in dealing with inimical forces/entities (... especially if the latter were to wield great power and influence.) ~ In the world of diplomacy there is no such thing as promises or permanent friendship/alliances - without mutual commonalities. Both the quality and the quantity of mutual commonalities may advance positive alliance. It is crucial to tactfully employ alliance-building strategies. Nothing is cast-iron otherwise. (Events and situations are dynamic and ever-changing.) There are issues and interests, there is give-and-take; people and groups (even adversaries and unknown entities... who may have asymmetric resources, power and clout) sit across the table/meet with each other, interact and discuss (issues, concerns and points) - over a period of time - to align their interests, to identify commonalities and areas of convergence ~ to finally come to an acceptable agreement/convergence of interests/views or a reasonably win-win situation. [There would be no progress otherwise; it would result in a perpetual stalemate, and letting go of opportunities... and ultimately the converse of 'a stitch in time saves nine'. How then would a people and nation move into the direction they want to go?] In such a world/scenario... being 'rigid-rigid' is folly. [Savvy-flexible: visionary/far-sighted/far-thinking, sagacious (discerning enough to read situations/events... and how they are likely to unfold); to be able to see/keep the big (macro) picture in mind.] ~ An understanding of issues/events/situations and how they are likely to play out in the short/mid-term and long-term is crucial. ~ Krishn was a diplomat par excellence; he was simultaneously a nation-builder, a catalyst, and statesman-par-excellence as well - one who was among humans for a purpose; one who also thought about the future of humanity and civilizational progress... and this reflects in his many endeavours. (He was also the one who steered the intra-yug transition - from one era/yug to another - from Dvapar to Kaliyug.) ~ His sharpness, foresight and courage coupled with his visceral fortitude, ability to stay the course, savvy-flexibility and alchemic nature (i.e. his ability to withstand adversities + his ability to soak up 'toxin') made things happen (despite great obstacles/impediments, and despite him not being in a position of strength vis-à-vis his adversaries and so forth.) ~ Thus he is Yug Purush (Renaissance Man). | In Treta, one of the major reasons for the Ramayana War... was to destroy dangerous weaponry (including nagpaas and gigantic humanoid-robots like "Kumbhakarna" - that carried a variety of weaponry) ~ to protect this planet and civilizations therein. Shri Ram (the Ram-avatar/the 7th Vishnu) also dismantled the "Shiv-dhanush" or Pinaka - euphemism for the most destructive nuclear weapons - after an all-round agreement/general consensus. ~ In Dvapar, one of the major purposes of the Dharm-Yudh (battle of ideas, principles, vision, inclusivity and progress - for the future of humanity/human society; dharm = right action for the greater good) was to rid the planet of extremely destructive weaponry and unnatural humans (highly evolved humanoids - genetically engineered and cloned) - to allow the planet, humanity and human civilization to "heal"... so as to progress naturally and peacefully.]

Krishn bide his time (the crocodile allegory ~ jhaṣāṇāḿ makaraś cāsmi - since a crocodile can be associated with patience and precision) and chose the moment of action with precision; he also reinstated the old Ugrasena back on the throne. The opposite of Jarasandha in his goal, Krishn would be no 'samrat' (emperor) ~ for his status is that of 'svarat/svarāṭ' (one who removes tyrants - those who establish hegemony to the detriment of the people and society, and other such negative entities.) The fall of Jarasandh freed nearly a hundred chieftains/kings, various clans and indeed the whole country of the spectre of the (proverbial) all-constricting Magadhan python. Here is the idea of loka-sangraha ("welfare of all" or the "larger/collective good") exemplified. Krishn's brilliance, his overwhelming intelligence, far-sightedness and motives are precisely what should have engaged and inspired the likes of Dhritarashtra, Dronacharya, Bhishma Pitamah et al: to shun inertia/complacency, to overcome negative thoughts and narrow parochial motives... and to perform their dharma and duty/karm (i.e. to work for the greater/collective good - loka-sangraha or loka-kalyana.) | Krishn was not motivated by personal glory. His actions enabled the planet to gradually "heal", and humanity to gradually find its rhythm; it helped create a new and peaceful society that was progressive and prosperous. Thus, his thoughts and actions personify 'loka kalyana' (the greater good). His was nishkam karmaat its finest (selfless/non-glory-seeking karm - for the larger/collective good); he simply performed his duty/karm (as the Cosmic Ruler and Cosmic Teacher). ~ The whole life of Lord Krishn is (thus) like the roaring sound of a conch (~ shankhadhvani is considered auspicious; it is soothing). Krishn exudes grace and goodness (and so, is also known as Sundar). He is a true karm-yogi (do refer the relevant passages on karm-yogi, nishkam karm and hamsah - the swan.) ~ It is the very human-ness of Krishn that is part of his aura... and transcends era/yugs. | The remarkable qualities of the head and the heart (noble traits/sattva guna) that makes Krishn pre-eminent among statesmen, counselors, diplomats and philosophers as well as among leaders of people and nations shines forth brilliantly. Thus, he is also a transcendent legend, a magnificent 'Yug Purush' (Renaissance man/Millennium Man/Man of Destiny or the Timeless Man). Sri Krishn has transcended eras/yug, his karm and his philosophy is timeless, he continues to inspire. | The renowned American thinker, poet, author, historian, philosopher and leading transcendentalist, Henry David Thoreau said, "A man is wise with the wisdom of his time only, and ignorant with its ignorance." This is true of ordinary people. But, in every era (yug), a handful of people appear amidst us once in a while, who prove to be an exception. At one level, these exceptional and extraordinary people are products of their time. But at another level they transcend their times. ~ Their perceptions, their insights, their thoughts, their actions and their concerns are truly universal - in all respects; they are neither constrained by the circumstances of their birth nor are they limited by the ignorance of their time. They are truly incomparable. Krishn is the foremost of such exceptional transcendental 'Yug Purush'. [~ Perhaps we can also call the very erudite (Brahmana is derived from Brhm - wisdom, knowledge - and signifies erudition) Chanakya Vishnugupt a 'Yug Purush'. Chanakya, who not only rid the country of yet another (proverbial) all-constricting Magadhan python, Dhana Nanda, but also the rampaging Alexander, in another era - to unite a fractured nation and lay the foundations of a glorious era. Chandragupta Maurya's humble origins made no difference to the great Master. [refer: link. Maurya comes from 'Moriya' or 'Mura'. (Pali: Mora) - the Moriya were peacock-feather gatherers.]~ Maybe even Samraat Chandragupta II Vikramaditya... who, by thwarting the designs (negative/malignant imperialistic ambitions) of the Sakas, and driving them out of wide swathes of land, (perhaps almost the whole of modern Asia)... established peace and prosperity under his wise, benevolent and enlightened rule. Thereafter, he assumed the title of Vikramaditya. (Vikram means: one who is wise, diligent, brave and strong as well as victorious. The Sanskrit word -kram is a root word meaning 'step or stride', so the name Vikram can be understood to mean Vishnu's stride in itself, or as a name which reflects the qualities of Vishnu's stride. In Vedic scripture, Vishnu's stride is said to be over the earth, the sky, and the all-pervading omnipresent essence of the universe/cosmos. Hence Lord Narayan/Vishnu/Keshavah is also known as Trivikram.) Aaditya = the Sun. Thus, Vikramaditya roughly translates to: the radiance of Vikram.] ~ Krishn - the Renaissance Man - is therefore, timeless and universal. He belongs to all eras/yug; his wisdom, his knowledge, his advice/counsel and his philosophy are ever relevant. |The Srimad Bhagavad Gita is a trove of knowledge, philosophy, guidance and counsel ~ that transcends eras/yugs. Krishn's advise is to shun negative thinking. He did not try to micromanage either. Instead, he let Arjun make his own decision. ~ And so, even when Arjun was overcome with feelings of confusion, Krishn very patiently brushed away the cobwebs of the mind (through the sublime and illuminating conversation now known as the Srimad Bhagavad Gita). He did not command Arjun. On the contrary, he was persuasive, provided sustained support and wise counsel. Thus the course of the Mahabharata resulted in an upward trajectory.

Krishn remains an enigma. He is deep blue. We admire the blue pre-dawn hours. The waters of the ocean look blue from afar. But if you go near and take it in your palms, you will no longer find it blue; it will be very clear, transparent. The oceans continue to remain an enigma. ~ Krishna too is just like the deep blue waters of the ocean: Achintya (inscrutable, enigmatic). Thus, he is often shown as having a dark-blue complexion: not just blue, but a deep blue, like the velvet blue/indigo that sometimes can be seen in a dark sky, like a blue that one may have at times seen from the deck of a ship thousands of miles from shore on the Pacific Ocean or perhaps on the Atlantic Ocean. ... And whenever there is something of unfathomable depth, it appears to be deep blue. ... Lord Krishn is like a deep and mighty river flowing through the history of our nation. The Mahabharata ('The Great History of the Bharatas') would have been very different without him. He was the fulcrum. ~ This transcendent man started out with tremendous disadvantage: his dethroned clan could not have made matters easier for him; his old grandfather (the dethroned Ugrasena) or even his father (Vasudev) could not have given him a leg up or lent him a helping hand either; also, influential members of his clan had aligned their interests with Jarasandha, Duryodhan, Kansh, etc; so all that coupled with the latters' machinations - thus Krishn found himself in the middle of events and circumstances so nebulous... that perhaps even its creators may not have fully understood. ~ However, all that did not turn him into a negative person; he was not pessimistic or sullen. He remained cheerful, resilient and invigorating. Besides, he was steely-nerved and politically astute, and possessed plenty of guile and intestinal fortitude. Besides, his understanding/reading/assessment of events/situations was prescient; his timing was perfect. And so, he worked tirelessly, ushered in/facilitated positive change, reformed, engaged, removed numerous obstacles, soaked up 'toxin', cleared away the 'cobwebs' of the past, "healed", provided guidance, traced the trajectory, put in place a framework/architecture... set the ball rolling, so to speak. ~ BG 2.47: || karmaṇy evādhikāras te mā phaleṣu kadācana mā karma-phala-hetur bhūrmā te sańgo 'stv akarmaṇi || ~ Do your duty (i.e. imbibe the spirit of dharma - right action for the greater good + collective/cumulative karm-yog) to the best of your ability. Overcome your limitations. Concentrate on your convergences. Do not highlight your divergences/differences. Shun lethargy. Overcome inertia. Be positive. Never lose hope. ~ He led by example and instructed through his own behaviour (acharan) - the mark of a true teacher/guru/mentor. As per his stated: || dharma-samsthapanarthaya sambhavami yuge yuge ||~ to renew/rebuild/re-energize/revive/reinvigorate/revitalize/rejuvenate the principles of "dharma" [right action for the greater/collective good] and "karm-yog" - for the benefit of mankind/humanity ~ so as to help create/build and sustain a better [progressive, prosperous, inclusive] human society/civilization,I manifest Myself yuge-yuge, yug/age/era after yug/age/era. | ~ So much so that even some five millenniums down the line... his life and times, his work/ contributions, his vision, his indomitable spirit, his philosophy and advice remain as fresh and as relevant as ever. They are timeless and seminal, and will remain so ~ forever. He comes across as approachable, not snobbish or aloof - though he may not have suffered fools gladly; and, he was neither a quitter nor impractical or unrealistic. He did not let a political vacuum/void to follow important events, e.g. he did not let a 'vacuum' or void to aftercede Jarasandh. He was not someone who lived in a world of fantasy, nor was his ideas and thoughts un-doable or impractical. Instead, he was a clear-eyed realist, a doer (karm-yogi - man of action; he possessed the ability to walk the talk), a catalyst, a phenomenon, and a force of nature. He is a trailblazer/pathfinder (he is the perennial guide, after all). ~ Frankly, Krishn is such a sparkling, riveting personage... no matter how much we write about him, it's still not enough. He's not transient/ephemeral; he does not come across as superficial or perfunctory either. He is trikalagya and 'turns the wheel of dharma (right action - for the greater/collective good) and karm-yog'; he awakens - by bringing out both the positive and the negative ~ so as to dispel confusion, apathy and ignorance (~ to usher in clarity, introspection and thereby organic transformation... leading to gradual corrective action/course correction - organic, positive change; upward trajectory.) He soaks up 'toxin'/negativism (to 'cleanse'/to remove human pettiness: to correct the course; to renew/re-energize; to help humanity ~ so that human society can function and progress). | However, wherever there is the convergence of purity (self-realization and non-glory-seeking) and depth (boundlessness) it produces the colour blue. Meghavarnam. The water of the seas and the sky - both are blue-hued. ~ And, since the Almighty combines both purity and depth or boundlessness... He too is (allegorically) 'blue-hued'. (~ It's a concept - to indicate His divine attribute/divinity.)

Prince Ram was a Chakravartin and reformer (referlink - for more details on Cakravartinand 'Cakravartin system of governance/administration'), he upheld Raj-dharma and established a prosperous, progressive and inclusive society, euphemistically known as 'Ram-Rajya'. Prince Siddhartha was a teacher, guide/mentor and reformer. Treta and Dvapar was very different. ~ The Mahabharata ('The Great History of the Bharatas') was a dharma-yuddha; it was a battle of ideas, principles, inclusivity, progress and vision - for the future of humanity/human society (~ not moralism or impractical idealism, etc) - for a better 'way of life'. It was about what should prevail? What should happen to humanity and human society of Dvapar and beyond? ~ Downward spiral or an upward movement? ~ Hence he is Brahma, a regenerating force - one who is the cause of/for revival.) ~ Imagine if Jarasandh (and his allies) or Duryodhan (and his allies) were to prevail - what would have been the outcome? What turn would the Mahabharata have taken? ~ Therefore, Krishn's was the highest dharmic mission: to stem the free-fall/churn/manthan; to protect, to preserve, to dispel sankat/calamity, and to stabilize and re-energize. He not only upheld Raj-dharma (the duties and responsibilities of a sovereign/ruler - to protect/preserve/regenerate/revive/reform/guide and show the way forward), but also upheld dharma - Loka-kalyana or Loka-sangraha - the greater good. ~ Shri Ram and Shri Krishn performed nishkam/selfless karm with the dharmic freedom of inner detachment; they were Cosmic Teachers as well as catalysts; they were pathfinders... no matter how daunting the issues and challenges confronting the respective eras/humanity/society. ~ That is why they are known as Hare-Ram and Hare-Krishna. ~ They did not discriminate. ~ BG 10.34: || kīrtiḥ śrīr vāk ca nārīṇāḿ smṛtir medhā dhṛtiḥ kṣamā || ~ Among women I am glorious deeds (kīrtiḥ), radiance (śrīr), fine speech/persuasion (vāk), memory/clarity of thought/discernment (smṛtir), intelligence (medhā), resilience/steadfastness (dhṛtiḥ) and patience/forgiveness/high-mindedness/magnanimity/nobility of spirit (kṣamā).]

~ The Chandravanshi/Chandradhvaj/Moon-flag-bearing Yaduvansh derives its name from Yayati's eldest son, Yadu; Devayani was their ancestress. [~ Yayati hailed from a Chandravanshi/ Moon-flag-bearing clan.] ~ Yayati, as we know, did away with primogeniture, and crowned his youngest-born, Puru, as the heir to his "existing" kingdom (~ i.e. the areas he ruled... before he underwent stem cell therapy). Thus, Puru ruled his kingdom in the Gangetic plain. While Yayati's other four sons - Yadu, Turvasu, Druhyu and Anu - were settled in the "newer" areas (~ the ones Yayati brought under his rule/control - during his "borrowed youth" ~ i.e. post his stem cell therapy.) | Yadu was the progenitor of the Yaduvansh (~ Sharmishtha was their ancestress.) Puru started the "Puruvansh" (also known as the "Bharatvansh"); thus his heirs came to be known as the "Bharatas". King Porus (Puru/Paurava/Parvateshvar) hailed from the Puruvansh (Pauravas). [Yayati and Dushyant's stories are part of the same history. Dushyant's son was Bharat.] | The Shurasenas or Shurasena Yadus (Megasthenes' Sourasenoi - referlink) were a branch of the Yadu clan/kula (the ancient clan/lineage of Harikula or Harivansh) to which Krishn belonged. ~ But then, who were the Vrishnis? | Ancient tales speak of vimanas. Great wars have been described in various ancient texts. Weapons could literally level the land like a moving force field. The deserts on a number of continents today are the result of (prehistoric) nuclear warfare. ~ Historian K. M. Ganguli says that an atomic war is documented in the Mahabharata. Passages describe an ancient battle that included powerful Vimana, nagpaas (incorrectly translated/understood as "a trap made of a million snakes". Snakes = poisonous. So the nagpaas could be an allusion to very potent nerve agents, etc), and explosions of weapons ("shaft" or high-tech "missiles") that could "decimate entire armies, casting crowds of warriors with steeds and elephants and weapons to be carried away as if they were dry leaves of trees." Instead of mushroom clouds, the writer describes a perpendicular explosion with its billowing smoke clouds as consecutive openings of giant parasols. There are comments about the contamination of food and people's hair falling out. Even water boiling. ~ Consider these verses from the Mahabharata referring to an unknown weapon, an "iron thunderbolt": ... An incandescent column of smoke and flame as bright as the thousand suns rose in all its splendour... a perpendicular explosion with its billowing smoke clouds... the cloud of smoke rising after its first explosion formed into expanding round circles like the opening of giant parasols... it was an unknown weapon, an iron thunderbolt, a gigantic messenger of death, which reduced to ashes the entire clan of the Vrishnis and the Andhakas. ...The corpses were so burned as to be unrecognizable. The hair and nails fell out; pottery broke without apparent cause, and the birds turned white. After a few hours all foodstuffs were infected... to escape from this fire, the soldiers threw themselves in streams to wash themselves and their equipment| Until the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, modern mankind could not imagine any weapon as devastating as those described in the ancient Indian texts. Yet, they very accurately described the effects of an atomic explosion. Radioactive poisoning will make hair and nails fall out. Immersing oneself in water gives some respite, though it is not a cure. | Other cities have been found in northern India that shows indications of explosions of great magnitude. One such city, found between the Ganges and the mountains of Rajmahal, seems to have been subjected to intense heat. Huge masses of walls and foundations of the ancient city are fused together, literally vitrified. ~ And since there is no indication of a volcanic eruption, the intense heat to melt clay vessels can only be explained by an atomic blast or some other unknown weapon. The cities were wiped out entirely. | The Indus valley is now the Thar desert, and the site of the radioactive ash found west of Jodhpur is around there. A heavy layer of radioactive ash in Rajasthan covers a three-square mile area, ten miles west of Jodhpur. For some time it has been established that there is a very high rate of birth defects and cancer in the area under construction. The levels of radiation there have registered very high on investigators' gauges. Scientists have unearthed an ancient city where evidence shows an atomic blast dating back thousands of years, from 8,000 to 12,000 years, destroyed most of the buildings and probably a half-million people. ~ Archeologist Francis Taylor says that etchings in some nearby temples he managed to translate suggest that the people prayed to be spared from the great light that was coming to lay ruin to the city. "It's so mid-boggling to imagine that some civilization had nuclear technology before we did. The radioactive ash adds credibility to the ancient Indian records that describe atomic warfare."| The Indus ruins: everything was crystallized, fused or melted. Even the bricks were melted on one side indicating a blast. ~ Walls, furniture, people melted, then crystallized. No natural burning flame or volcanic eruption could have produced a heat intense enough to cause this phenomenon. Only the heat released through something like atomic energy could have done this damage. Radioactive skeletons and melted remains; excavations found skeletons (flattened to the ground) scattered about the cities, in the streets - as if some instant, horrible doom had taken place. These skeletons are among the most radioactive ever found. | Researcher David Davenport claimed to have found a 50-yard-wide epicenter where everything appeared to have been fused through a transformative process known as vitrification. ~ Vitrification is a process in which regular-type stone gets molten into a magma state, and then it hardens again. But once the stone is hardened again it feels like glass. Amidst the ruins there is evidence of vitrification, which could only have been achieved if the material was exposed to extreme heat by some type of blast. |Several Indus Seals show the Zebu Bull ~ was it the symbol/insignia of the Vrishnis? Was the bison the symbol/insignia of the Andhakas? ~ My guess is as good as yours. |What could have happened in the Indus Valley? Was parts of a well-populated, ancient city destroyed by a horrendous explosion that seemingly could have been caused by an atomic bomb, evidenced by vitrified stones, crystallized, fused and melted together by a 1500 deg. C heat across 50 yards wide? | Was there a nuclear warfare between ancient civilizations? And did these skeletons give rise to the 'Aryan Invasion theory'? ~ My guess is as good as yours. | There is evidence that part of the Rama empire was devastated by nuclear war. ~ The Indus valley is now the Thar desert, and the site of the radioactive ash found west of Jodhpur is around there. A heavy layer of radioactive ash in Rajasthan, covers a three-square mile area, ten miles west of Jodhpur. | ~ Who was this "Indra" also known as Purandharaor destroyer of forts? Was it a reference to King Saalva (was he from Atlantis?) or someone else? Saalva and his attempt to destroy the city of Krishna. In the process it describes weapons which have all the earmarks of rocketry and aerial vehicles which have capabilities far beyond what we find today. [A Vimana could be made to become invisible - by 'Goodha', a mechanism that harnessed the powers, Yaasaa, Viyaasaa, Prayaasaa in the 8th atmospheric layer covering the earth, to attract the dark content of the solar ray, and then using it to hide the Vimana from the adversary.] Krishna of the Vrishnis and Krishna of the Mahabharata ~ are they same? ~ My guess is as good as yours. |Or was it Jarasandha (the king of Magadha) who launched a relentless assault against Krishn and his fellow Vrishnis in Mathura? [~ Vrishnis were the descendant of Vrishni (who in turn was a descendent of Yadu in Yaduvansh.) Krishn belonged to this branch of the Chandravansh of Vrishnis (~ and thus, he was also known as Varshneya). [~ The people of Dvarka were also known as the Vrishnis.] | Jarasandha had friendly relations with the Chedi king Shishupala, the Kuru king Duryodhana and the Anga king Karna. After the dharma-yuddha (battle of ideas, principles, vision, inclusivity and progress - for the future of humanity/human society; in other words: right action - for the greater good), Magadha became the foremost of ancient kingdoms with the new capital Pataliputra, a port city on the banks of the river Ganges. [Krishna founded the city of Pataliputra - 138 generations before the reign of Chandragupta Maurya. (Referlink- for Pataliputra.)]The Nandas and Mauryas ruled this kingdom. And maybe even the Guptas. ~ The Mauryas built the celebrated Mauryan Empire that spanned far and wide. This empire was formidable even to Alexander (refer link- for Chanakya, Pataliputra, etc).] [Note:Shri Ram was a nation-builder and Chakravartin-raja; whether his empire was confined to the contours of modern India or not ~ my guess is as good as yours. (Refer the relevant passages -for more details on Chakravartin and 'Chakravartin system of governance/administration'.) | Takshasila/Taxila: Taksha and Pushkala were Bharat and Mandavi's sons. [Mandavi was Sita's cousin; daughter of Kushadwaj (younger brother of Sita's foster-father, Sheeradwaj). Sheeradwaj is best known as Raja Janak; "Janak" being the title assumed by the kings of Videha, also known as Janakpur.] ~ Yudhajeet (Kaikeyi's brother) and Bharat (Kaikeyi's son) assimilated the kingdom of Gandhara... and built the city of Takshasila (named after Taksha - Bharat's son.) Bharat also built another city after his other son Pushkala; this city was known as Pushkala-vati or "Lotus City". ~ It was also known as Purusha-pura - the abode/city dedicated to the Cosmic Spirit/Energy (Purushottam Satya). ~ Takshasila: to the east of the river Indus was known to Alexander and the Greeks as: Taxila, while Pushkala-vati (Lotus City; possibly modern Peshawar) - to the west of the river Indus, was known to them as: Peukelaotis. ~ Later, the descendants of Bharat ruled this region from Takshasila. [... Now whether Takshasila, the place where the famed university existed, got its name from Taksha (son of Bharat and Mandavi) or not ~ my guess is as good as yours. ~ Bharat's kingdom was probably known as Taksha Khanda, and very likely extended up to modern Tashkent. | ~ Shri Ram's actions not only helped build a better/progressive society but also gave him the required gravitas and goodwill... once he ascended the throne; he (probably) deferred the coronation - to bring about positive societal change, Kaikeyi and Manthara aided him. ~ His 14-years-long exile was (very likely) a voluntary one; in his absence, (Kaikeyi's son) Bharat - younger to Ram but older than (Sumitra's twins) Lakshman and Shatrughna - was an acceptable alternative. [He may not have acquiesced on his own; 'coz even in Ram's absence he chose to sit next to the throne.] ~ Raja Dasarath was suffering from an assortment of old age-related ailments, and was (thus) keen to arrange the coronation. Shri Ram, however, (probably) wanted to defer it, 'coz as Dasarath's heir he would not have had the required gravitas to bring about social reform (~ to change perceptions, mindset, and so on, 'coz no amount of legislation or even royal decree would have achieved it); besides, kingly duties et al would have straitjacketed him. ~ Thus he is hailed as "Maryada Purushottam". ~ His actions resulted in a prosperous and inclusive society (euphemistically known as 'Ram Rajya'). |The "Rama Empire" (also known as the Ikshvaku Empire) was a nation of many large, sophisticated cities; it existed parallel to the Atlantean civilization (possibly in the mid-Atlantic Ocean), and was ruled by enlightened Priest-Kings who governed the cities. ["Great Teachers" or "Masters" who were the benevolent aristocracy of the Rama civilization led these cities. Today they are generally called "Priest-Kings". They were apparently men whose mental and yogic powers were of a degree that seems incredible to most people of today.] The seven greatest capital cities of the Rama Empire were known in classical texts as The Seven Rishi Cities. Rishi (Sanskrit: ṛṣI) signifies enlightenment, wisdom and knowledge. ... So, were these Seven Rishi Cities knowledge hubs or thinking hub? ~ My guess is as good as yours. [~ The yet-to-be-deciphered Rongo Rongo glyphs (in Easter Island) are strikingly similar to the still undeciphered Indus glyphs/script. So, was Easter Island an air base for the Rama Empire's Vimana route? ~ My guess is as good as yours. Also, 'agni-pariksha' is not literal; it is a colloquial phrase ('test by fire' or 'baptized by fire') indicative of challenges, tough times or hardships... something that Siya-Ram together persevered (along with Lakshman, etc) ~ in their quest/effort to bring about positive societal change - through change of long-held perception and mindset. They persevered, and mainstreamed various marginalized and underprivileged groups such as the adi-vasi or forest-dwelling human (van-nar) and 'tritiya prakriti' (various groups under this nomenclature); Shri Ram also improved the position of women by undoing several negative aspects prevalent in Treta. He thus established a progressive, prosperous and inclusive society, euphemistically known as 'Ram-Rajya'. It is very likely that there was dignity of labour. ~ 'Nose-cut' too is a colloquial phrase, indicative of hurt ego/pride or affront. Lakshman (very likely) spurned Surpanakha and she probably felt slighted. | With the cataclysmic sinking of Atlantis and the wiping out/destruction of (parts of) the Rama Empire with atomic weapons, the world collapsed into a "stone age" of sorts, and modern history picks up a few thousand years later.] |Kaikeyi belonged to the Kekaya Mahajanapada (kingdom) and hailed from a clan known as the Kekaya (also: Kaikaya or Kaikeya). Hence her name was Kaikeyi (i.e. of/from the Kaikeya); it also refers to the ruling clan of the Kekaya/Kaikeya clans (from which Kaikeyi hailed). The Kekaya/Kaikeya clans were settled in ancient Udyana/Oḍḍiyānaand is said to have dwelt between Gandhara and the VipASa (Beas). ~ She was the daughter of the mighty Ashwapati/Aśwapati (Ashwa/Aśwa = horse; Ashwapati/Aśwapati = Lord/Master of Horses; since the Kekayas were exceptional cavalrymen) - a long-term ally of Ayodhya. [The Kekayas also stood with Krishn during the dharma-yuddh - battle of ideas, principles, vision, inclusivity and progress - for the future of humanity/human society.] ~ Madri belonged to a clan known as the Madrakas or Medes (also: Madai); this clan probably migrated to ancient Persia, but later returned to 'Sapta-Sindhu' (Vedic Sapta Sindhavaḥ; refer link.) The Madrakas/Medes may also have been Anus - descendents of Yayati's son, Anu. ~ Gandhari, on the other hand, hailed from ancient Gandhar (it was an important kingdom and probably consisted much of ancient/Vedic Upaganasthan, meaning: land (sthan) of the allied clans. | || gandharvāṇāḿ citrarathaḥ siddhānāḿ kapilo muniḥ|| ~ "Of the Gandharvas I am Citraratha (king of the Gandharvas), and among perfected beings I am the sage Kapila." ~ Gandhara probably derived its name from Gandharva. There is a well-known medicinal herb known as Asvagandha. Asva = horse. But asva may also mean Ashvaka - the people renowned for their horsemanship, i.e. people who were expert cavalry-men (aśva-yuddha-Kuśalah). Gandha = fragrance, odour or smell (though this may have been mistakenly taken as 'a reference to the odour of the root'). This herb probably was abundant in the Ashvaka lands (ancient Kamboja, the land of the ancient Gandharvas.) Therefore, apart from being adept at the performing arts and having mastery over an assortment of musical instruments, the Gandharvas were expert horsemen as well. The ancient Gandharva and Ashvaka were Soma-drinking guardians of our heritage. (Do also read the passages on Apsara.) | However, due to the excellent breed of horses and the sharp horsemanship of the people there, Upaganasthan gave way to Aspaganistan (Persian). ~ Just like how Ashv (Sanskrit) became Asp (Old Persian). Or how Sapta-Sindhu (Vedic Sapta Sindhavaḥ) became Hapta-Handu (Persian) - finally culminating in the word "Hindu". [~ The Avesta-speakers probably referred to Sapta Sindhavaḥ as Hapta-HAndu. ~ In Old Persian the 'S' for Sindhu/Sindhavaḥ (River Indus) becomes 'H' (due to lack of phonetics). Therefore: Sapta Sindhu/ Sapta Sindhavaḥ becomes Hapta HAndu. Refer link - for the genesis of the word "Hindu" and "India".] ~ There were two Kambojas: eastern and western Aśvakas. ~ The horse was a much sought-after animal or means of transport in these parts (ancient Kambojas). So much so that it became indispensable and an integral part of the people's lives (they took pride in horsemanship). [~ It is possible that some groups or clans were more attached to the horse than the others... and so, these groups/clans came to be known as the 'Children of the Horse' or 'Son of the Horse' - the Aspzai. The Greeks called them the Aspasioi. (Panini's Ashvakayanasis very likely an amalgamation of two words: Ashvaka + Ayana. Ayana = story, journey; Asva = horse, Ashvaka = horsemen.) ~ Much later, the asp became Esop... and so, the Aspzai became Esopzai.] In Sanskrit, ashv means horse. The generic term for these horsemen was Ashvaka (or Aśvakan - in Sanskrit). They were also known as: Assaka - derived from the Prakrit Assa (meaning: horse). Aśvaka/Aśvakan or Assaka literally meant: someone connected with the horses: a horseman, or a cavalryman or breeder of horses. Aśvaka is also interpreted as 'land or home of horses'. Kamboja was known as "the country of horses" (Asvanam ayatanam), and it was perhaps this aspect that the horse-breeders of ancient Udyana/Oḍḍiyānabecame known as Aspasioi (from the Old Pali aspa) and Assakenoi (from the Sanskrit asva - horse). Ashv became Aspa or Asp in ancient Persian, while Ashvaka (or Ashvakan) became Aspagan and Sthan (Sanskrit) became Stan (Persian). (The Sanskrit 'sthan' (meaning: land or place) is 'stan' in Persian. ~ Both extremely erudite and mellifluous languages, the Old Persian-Sanskrit connection go back a long way.) The Kambojas were famous for their horses (ashv or aśva) and as expert cavalry-men (aśva-yuddha-kuśalah). Ashvakas (or Aśvakas), 'horsemen', was the term popularly applied to them, though they were included within the more general term: Kambojas. Now whether the Hayagreeva-avatar (refer link ) was worshipped in these parts or not ~ my guess is as good as yours.| Even Chaturanga (Sanskrit: caturaṅga) - an ancient Indian strategy game, (and the common ancestor of the board games chess, shogi, makruk, xiangqi and janggi) was developed during the Gupta era (around the 6th century AD). In the 7th century, it was adopted as shatranj in Sassanid Persia, which in turn was the form of chess brought to late-medieval Europe. Caturaṅga and shatranj - the tonal similarity is due to the Avestan Persian-Sanskrit connection.]|Arya or Aryan is not 'race', it means noble or noble-natured; it refers to a noble 'way of life'. (Arya Dharma = the Aryan way of life). The Arya people followed a pattern of life based on Arya-Dharma or Arya ethics/tenets, i.e. a noble way of life.Aryan-ness was simply their 'way of life'; they were inherently noble-minded or noble-natured. In ancient times there was no Central Asia, etc. 'Aryavarta' ('land inhabited by the Arya people') stretched far and wide. ~ It does not indicate homogeneity though; population demographics, physical characteristics, culture et al were not homogeneous or monolithic; and yet there was an underlying similarity/affinity in their 'way of life'. | The ancient civilizations were understood as Aryan, Mlechcha and Yavana. | Alexander was a Yavana. ~ Yavana indicates a people who were reasonably cultured, knowledgeable, great builders and architects, and yet... indulged in un-Aryan (ignoble) behaviour like slave-taking, buying and selling of humans in markets, plunder and pillage, misbehaviour with women, and so on. |Mlechcha = uncivilized. | As for the Aryans: not that there were no military conquests. There were. However, the emphasis was on synergy-creation (connect/confluence) and assimilation, learning from the new. There was no colonization, exploitation, slave-taking, et al a la (e.g.) Alexander - who left a trail of devastation in his wake. ~ A conquered nation and people were not treated shabbily; their 'way of life' etc were not overhauled; the women-folk, elderly people and children were not mistreated; livestock/animals, plants/trees were not harmed, water-bodies were not polluted - 'coz all of these were against Arya Dharma (noble 'way of life'). Instead, a conquered nation and people were provided with the same level of governance/administration (that the others experienced) and/or a better governance/administration (~ than what they experienced before). This helped to generate goodwill - for both cultures/peoples to comprehend each other better - a win-win. [~ Thus, examples were also set, and lessons effortlessly passed on to the next/future generation(s) ~ the quiet 'turning of the wheel' of karm-yog.]

..........................................................................

~ Krishn means "all-attractive/absorbing one" (and therefore, "black"; it is allegorical, not to be taken literally.) ~ Lord Narayan is Rohit (Rohitah/Lohitah in Sanskrit). And so, Krishn too is probably reddish-hued (Lohith/Rohitah or Rohit). ~ The rare blue lotus is termed pushkara or indivara. It is also known as krishna kamal - signifying the wisdom of knowledge (Kundalini). ~ Many say: there is no blue lotus, no such flower exists or ever has; that it is a botanical chimera. So, whether blue lotus is allegorical or not ~ my guess is as good as yours. | ~ The seal bearing the motif of a 3-headed animal representing the bull, unicorn and goat is the seal of Dvarkadheesh Sudarshan Vasudev Krishn. ~ The symbology of the Bull: Dharma (selfless/nishkam karm + dharmic freedom [inner detachment]) is generally symbolized in Sanaatan Dharmic thought by the bull, Vrishabha. (~ Therefore, Lord Narayanis also called Vṛṣabha (the Great Bull). ~ He is also Dharmadhyaksha - Lord of Dharma (Vrisha Uttamam/Supreme Dharma.) |The Unicorn (eka-shringa or one-horned horse) is imagery, it signifies blue lotus: rarity. | The goat probably indicates Aries (or maybe, the Mṛgaśira - the constellation Orion). [Note: Also, since Shri Ram's eyes are compared to the Blue Lotus (pushkara or indivara), could it be that he was blue-eyed? ~ My guess is as good as yours. ~ But then, the term 'blue lotus' is allegorical; it refers to Krishn/Keshavah - the Unicorn - symbolizing rarity). | The rare blue lotus is known as krishna kamal - signifying the wisdom of knowledge (Kundalini - do read the passages on Kundalini). ~ The seal bearing the motif of a 3-headed animal representing the bull, unicorn and goat is the seal of Dvarkadheesh Sudarshan Vasudev Krishn (also known as Keshavah) - refer the relevant paragraphs to know what Keshavah and the symbology behind the seal means.) | Therefore, Shri Ram's eyes - compared to the Blue Lotus probably is allegorical. [Tagore said: nayan o somukhe tumi nai/ nayanero maajhkhaane niechho je thnai/ ... shyamale shyamal tumi neelimaye neel.] ~ Krishn means the "all-absorbing one"/Shyam/Ghanshyam (it is allegorical, not to be taken literally.)

Krishn is eternal, rustproof; therefore his appearance is celebrated, while his departure is not commemorated. [Probably the same is applicable for the other maha-avatars.] ... His advise, message and guidance is ever-relevant; they are not lofty, impractical or presumptuous; on the contrary they are realistic, pragmatic and doable - based on the nature and complexities of the challenges (faced by human society/civilization). ~ 'Coz each era/age/yug is distinct. Viewing them through the prism of another will be misleading. E.g. one cannot compare Treta to Dvapar. ~ Treta is known as Silver Age, while Dvapar is called Copper Age - since there is a quarterly decline in dharma and karm-yog, and this affects human society: social conditions, population, dynamics, mindset, worldview (comprehension/perceptive/cognitive abilities), etc too undergo a change; and so, some amount of decay sets in. When the manthan/churn becomes too great, the maha-avatars arrive to correct the course - to put it back on an upward trajectory; however collective and sustained karm-yog needs to continue. [~ The maha-avatars are Cosmic Teachers; protectors, preservers, stabilizing factors, catalysts, reformers, and so on; they don't prove anything. They guide (based on the challenges of the era/time), they change the course, they also shine a light/hold a mirror to society - for it to collectively introspect and take necessary measures. ~ There is no magic wand, no quick-fix, no instant solution - that is the lesson; humanity will have to sort out their own issues - through concerted effort, there is no one "out there" (a messiah figure) who will come and do it.] Positive transformation/change is not immediate/instant, that is impractical; there is no magic wand etc; it is incremental - the outcome of cumulative/collective work-in-progress. Only that will sustain. ~ Sat/Satya/Krita Yug is the metaphoric Golden Age; it is the age of renewal/resurgence/rejuvenation: prosperity, progress, wisdom, intellectual and spiritual illumination, and so on. Not instant or sudden transformation, but slow and steady work-in-progress. ~ Kali means bud/flower; however, the end of Kaliyug is known as ghor Kaliyug phase or 'Iron Age' of ignorance/stagnation/decay. [Here, 'Iron Age' is a negative term.] Ghor Kaliyug phase is thus the lowest point of all - based on the cumulative quarterly decline/decay of human society. | However, Dvapar was the most advanced of all ages/eras/yugs. [Do refer link- for more details.] ~ And if we are to factor in the all-round achievements (in science, mathematics, medicine, astronomy, metallurgy, art, architecture, literature, poetry, sculpture, education, innovation, research, knowledge, technical know-how, trade et al) in Kaliyug - until the Gupta Era (where it all reached its zenith) - we can get an idea of how Kaliyug actually was ~ before decay set in... leading to the ghor Kaliyug phase euphemistically known as the 'Iron Age' of ignorance/stagnation/decay.) ~ A complete cycle of four yugs is called Chatur-Yug or Maha-Yug; their lengths follow a ratio of 4:3:2:1. Thus, Sat/Satya/Krita Yug is the longest, while Kaliyug is the shortest. [Note:Lord Narayan/Harih/Vishnu/Satyam-Shivam-Sundaram/Satya-Sundar is the motive power and guiding spirit behind the mathematically precise universe. ... One can only wonder at the clockwork fashion/precision with which His maha-avatars work; 'coz the eras/yugs will 'close' and a new one 'commence' with precision. Even transition will happen with precision. ~ Time and tide waits for none.]

~ Keshavah - one who is himself the three: kah Brahma (Creator; Universal Consciousness, Omswaroop; creator/usherer of a new "dawn"/era/yug; re-energizer/regenerator/Renaissance Man/Yug Purush), ah Vishnu (protector and preserver/stabilizing factor) and Isa Shiva (destroyer/dispeller of calamity/sankat/troubles of humanity/human society; "Neelkanth" - the allegoric 'blue-throated one') - thus, Satyam-Shivam-Sundaram (dorefer the relevant passage on Satyam-Shivam-Sundaram). He is Omswaroop - the manifestation (swaroop) of OM or AUM - auspicious sound, the sound of the universe itself. Thus he is HariOM. | ~ BG 10.23: || rudranam sankaras casmi || ~ "Of all the Rudras I am Sankara" [Lord Shiva]. ~ Thus, Rudra-Siva. [They are not different entities.] ~ And so, Hari-Hara/Vishnu-Rudra/Hari-Sankara are not three different entities either. ~ Krishn (Hari-Krishna) himself is Shiva/Hara/Rudra/Sankara simultaneously. These are three different aspects. ~ Shivah means: the kindly auspicious one; one who is eternally pure; a kind herdsman (shepherd) of jiva-souls (individual or human souls.) ~ Shivah does not mean destroyer-destroyer; this aspect (i.e. the Shiva/Sankara/Rudra/Hara aspect) of Hari-Krishn indicates: destroyer/dispeller of troubles/calamities/Sankat, as well as dispeller/destroyer of ego/vanity/vainglory, ignorance, illusion, delusion, confusion, 'toxin' (Neelkanth), and so on. [Note: Since Hari-Krishn himself is Hari-Hara/Vishnu-Rudra/Hari-Sankara, therefore, Virupaksha (oblique eyes) is used for both the aspects: the Hari (aspect) as well as the Hara (aspect). ~ Rudraksha means: eye of Rudra (Rudra-Siva/Hara/Sankara). ... So, whether Virupaksha and Rudraksha have different meaning or not ~ my guess is as good as yours. Hari/Hara/Hare also means: destroyer/dispeller of troubles/calamities/Sankat; in other words: one who protects, preserves/stabilizes.]

keshavah: one who is himself the three: kah Brahma, ah Vishnu and IsaShiva; in other words: Satyam-Shivam-Sundaram (dorefer the relevant passage on Satyam-Shivam-Sundaram). | One who is himself the three: kah(refers to Brahma; He is also Prapitaamahah: The creator of Lord Brahma (father of the 'father of beings'/thus Lord Brahma is also known as Pitamah); ah (refers to Vishnu - the Preserver-Stabilizer) and Isa (refers to Shiva - the Destroyer; but Shivah is not destroyer-destroyer); thus, keshavah indicates the three aspects: of Creation-Stabilizing/Preservation-Destruction. ~ And therefore, Lord Narayan (Satya-Sundar: Satya/Eternal-Sundar/Grace and Goodness) is also known as Satyam-Shivam-Sundaram. |kah Brahma denotes Brhm (enlightenment/knowledge/wisdom, etc ~ indicative of the Sahasrara - the 7th chakra/the crown chakra - the highest chakra); ah Vishnu/Narayan (stabilizer-preserver - depicted with the Sudarshan Chakra); and Isa Shivah (destroyer/dispeller; it also indicates the 6th Chakra, also known as Ajna Chakra or Brow Chakra - the third-eye chakra.) [~ Note: Do read the paragraphs on Ajna Chakra/Brow Chakra, Shasrara and Kundalini.]

~ Krishn is Trikalagya: a "bhuta-bhavya-bhavat-prabhu" ("The Master of all things that exist in the past, future, and present"). ~ As he says to Arjun, that (as Almighty) he knows everything that has happened in the past, all that is happening in the present, and all things that are yet to come. ~ BG 7.26: || vedaham samatitanivartamanani carjunabhavisyani ca bhutani mam tu veda na kascana || ~ Therefore, his advise, message, guidelines/guidance is intrinsically linked to this aspect. (After all, he is Supreme Creator and Universal Consciousness (Brahmn); the highest authority of the universe/cosmos - Aadidevah or Aadinath.) ~ Hari-Krishna is Lord Narayan's Purna Avatar; God manifest in human form (svayam Bhagavan). ~ However, this is his manifestation to humanity; this is how he appears and interacts with earthlings/human society. ~ His primal/primordial form - as the Supreme Lord/Lord of Lords [maheśvaram] is the "Vishwa-roop" or "Viraat-roop". ... And that is intimidating; even Arjun felt overawed. ~ Hence he assumes a human form. He appears as the Cosmic Teacher - as a karm-yogi, a friend, a mentor, a guide/pathfinder and well-wisher of mankind. He engages and interacts; he assesses the nature and condition(s) of human society (caliber, mettle, intellectual and cognitive abilities, and so on); he also shines a light/holds a mirror to human society... and (accordingly) provides his guidance/advise. ~ He divests himself of his godliness - (probably) 'coz humanity (maanava-s/human species) is different from Higher Beings, therefore, human society has its own dynamics; and so, only organic change will sustain. [Thus, there is no alternative to collective and sustained karm-yog... to create/build (and sustain) a better society/civilization.] ~ In their human form we can find similarities in personality/character traits between the Ram-avatar (the 7th Vishnu) and the Krishn-avatar (the 8th Vishnu). ~ Krishn remains the same - his caliber and brilliance/wisdom/sagacity/far-sightedness et al (known as Sudarshan Chakra) does not change. [He is not Garuda-Dhvaja for nothing.] ... What changes though are the eras/yugs: its challenges, dynamics and complexities, the social conditions, nature/mindset/intellectual capacity/worldview, etc of humanity/human society/civilization. ~ As the Cosmic Ruler and Cosmic Teacher, his actions and guidelines/guidance (thus) takes into account these aspects/factors. E.g.: #1. What he could impart to Arjun may not have been the same as what he can impart to someone of a lesser caliber. [~ There is no magic wand, etc - to bring about instant positive change/transformation in society; the alternative (therefore) is karm-yog; 'coz only incremental and organic change will sustain.] #2. The humanity/human society of Dvapar was (somewhat) prepared (w.r.t. mettle, caliber, cognitive abilities, social conditions, and so on) - to be able to imbibe and incorporate what Krishn imparted; they could grasp some of it. In fact, Dvapar was the most advanced of all ages/eras/yugs. [Do refer link- for more details. ~ If we are to factor in the all-round achievements (in science, mathematics, medicine, astronomy, metallurgy, art, architecture, literature, poetry, sculpture, education, innovation, research, knowledge, technical know-how, trade etc) in Kaliyug - until the Gupta Era (where it all reached its zenith) - we can get an idea of how Kaliyug actually was ~ before decay set in... leading to the ghor Kaliyug phase (euphemistically known as the 'Iron Age' of ignorance/stagnation/decay).]~ Synergy/Connect (yog) is required between finites and Infinite. This awakens kundalini power. [And, therefore, karm-yog is important.] ~ However, if the Jiva-atma (human souls/finites) is unable to connect (yog) with the Param-aatma (Supersoul/Infinite) there will be no synergy creation; and therefore, humanity/human society/civilization will be unable to benefit from the One's guidance and wisdom. ~ Hence Krishn constantly advises humanity to connect with His energy; he also advises humanity to (sustained) introspection and karm-yog. (~ Thus, there is a perennial organic interplay [yog] between finite and Infinite, between created and Uncreated, between evanescent and Eternal.) 

(e.g.) Arjun understood Krishn very well: his actions, advise, ideas, guidelines and so on. Thus Krishn says: pāṇḍavānāḿ dhanañjayaḥ ~ I am Arjun among the Paandavs. ~ It indicates connect (yog) between them, and therefore, synergy creation. [~ However, this may not have been the same with someone of a lesser mettle, caliber and intellectual and perceptive abilities than Arjun.] ~ It does seem that the arrival of maha-avatars (including the Purna Avatar) is for a specific period of time, details of which were shared with our ancients well in advance (possibly due to their interactions with Higher Beings); (maybe) so as to not only intimate humanity of the arrival of the maha-avatar, but to also provide human society with an opportunity to prepare itself (~ to benefit fully from the avatar's guidance). ... The avatars never proclaim themselves. [~ Though in their human form, their portrayal e.g. in the Ramayana ('The Exertions of Shri Ram') and the Mahabharata ('The Great History of the Bharatas') - is ample indication.] Note: Shri Ram is integral to the Ramayana and the face of the Suryavanshi/Sun-flag-bearing Raghukula/Raghuvansh (his clan, lineage). While Shri Krishn is at the heart of the Mahabharata and the face of the Chandravanshi/Moon-flag-bearing Yaduvansh. ~ Also, the avatars' arrival and departure (very likely) is in a clockwork fashion, since the universe is mathematically precise; and so, the eras/yugs will 'close' and a new one 'commence' with precision. ~ As they say, time and tide waits for none.

Kundalini and Sahasrara Chakra:Kundalini = a concentrated field of intelligent, cosmic, invisible energy absolutely vital to life; beginning in the base of the spine when an individual begins to evolve - as wisdom is gained. ["Kundalini" (kuṇḍalinī), means: coiled. Sanskrit: kund = "to burn"; kunda = "to coil or to spiral".] ~ Kundalini has been described as liquid fire and liquid light. The ultimate outcome of kundalini is the union of Will (sakti-kundalini), Knowledge (prana-kundalini) and Action (para-kundalini). (~ And this should help us gauge/understand what level of kundalini/'serpent power' Krishn and even e.g. Chanakya possessed, or for that matter, Chandragupta Maurya and Vikramaditya possessed.) ~ In literal terms, the 'samudra-manthan' or 'sagar-manthan' tale is (also) an allegorical description of what transpires during a kundalini-awakening process. ... Kundalini is a latent energy that lies dormant in the spine. Upon awakening, it rises in a sensation akin to a slithering reptile, up the spinal column (Meru-danda, also represented by the [allegoric] Mount Meru [Mandar Parvat] in the story. ~ Allegoric - 'coz Mt Meru or Mandar Parvat is not a real mountain.) | BG 10.23:|| meruh sikharinam aham || ~ "and of mountains I am Meru." ~ Here Mt Meru is an allegory for Sahasrara Chakra - the 7th chakra - the crown chakra (the highest chakra). |BG 10.28: sarpāṇām asmi vāsukiḥ ~ and of serpents I am Vāsuki. ~ Here Vasuki is an allegory for kundalini. ~ If we look at the human brain: there is the left hemisphere (side 1) and the right hemisphere (side 2)... the area in the middle is (allegorically) occupied by a 'serpent'. [~ Therefore, we can say, kundalini is 'serpent power'.] Maybe, this power 'ignites' or 'illumines' the mind, in a manner of speaking; this in turn results in an immense amount of intelligence, foresight, wisdom, perception, vision, sagacity, and so on - which (then) leads to great deeds/karm. Its all interconnected (yog); therefore, kunda = "to coil or to spiral". [Note: It is possible that this power (kundalini or 'serpent power') was mistranslated/misinterpreted to mean: 'a serpent's crown jewel' or 'the priceless jewel found inside the head of serpents'.]~ Chakras are centers of Prāṇa, life-force, or vital energy. Chakras correspond to vital points in the physical body i.e. major plexuses of arteries, veins and nerves. The 7 Chakras are the energy centers in our body in which energy flows through. ~ Kundalini is vital for all the 7 Chakras (centers of Prāṇa, life-force, or vital energy) to be fully 'awakened'. And thishappens when Kundalini reaches the 7th chakra - Sahasrara/the crown chakra (the highest chakra). [~ The seventh chakra (Sahasrara) is the chakra that integrates all the chakras with their respective qualities. It is the last milestone of the evolution of human awareness. This happens when Kundalini passes through the top of the head, at the fontanel area. ... When the Kundalini reaches the Sahasrara, the 'lotus petals' open and enlightenment takes place. ~ The Kundalini (then) unites our individual consciousness with the Universal Consciousness (the jiva-atma/finites to the Param-aatma/Infinite).] ~ This state is also said to be the state of complete wisdom. [All this emphasizes the organic and deep connection (yog) between Jiva-atma (the individual/human souls/finites) and Param-aatma (the Supersoul/Infinite). ... This union of Jiva-atma (the individual/human soul) with the Param-aatma (Supersoul) is called "Sanaatan Dharma": connecting (yog) with the Higher Self or seeking communion (yog) with the Universal Consciousness (Brahmn or Param-aatma or Almighty). ~ "swa" is "higher self", "asti" meaning "being", and "ka" as a suffix, so the translation (of Swastika) can be interpreted as: "being with higher self" (i.e. yog/sanjog with the Supersoul). Lord Narayan/Vishnu is also known as "Svasti": One who is the source of all auspiciousness (~ i.e. dispeller of troubles/calamity; pathfinder). [Do refer link- for more details on Swastika, Vishwa-roop or Viraat-roop, Kurma-avatar, samudra-manthan, etc.]

[More on Sahasrara -the 7th chakra/the crown chakra (the highest chakra); do also read the above paragraph: The Shiva and the Shakti - the masculine and feminine - join within Sahasrara to create brahma-ranhdra, the transcendence of both (Ardhanarishvara?) ~ Within this chakra, the individual personality dissolves into the essence of the all. ... This is the chakra of (metaphoric/symbolic) one thousand petals. Sahasrarais unique in many ways. All other chakras feature upward, pointing lotuses. In the Sahasrara, the lotuses point downward, symbolizing freedom from the mundane (i.e. a Siddha, self-realized), and divine rain from its petals. The Sahasrara chakra was not considered an in-body chakra; (earlier) it was pictured as lying atop the head. The Saharsara is considered beyond most symbolic representations, although the chakra is usually perceived as white. ~ The Sahasrara is considered beyond senses, sense organs, and vital breath. As such, it is often described without a seed syllable, although some sources depict it with an OM. [~ OM or AUM is associated with both the Hari aspect and Hara aspect - Hari-Hara.] (Do also read the earlier paragraphs for more info on Sahasrara chakra and Hari-Hara.)

AUM (also known as OM):The syllable OM (written out as AUM with each letter having its own significance) represents Brahmn, the supreme creator (Srashtaa), as well as the whole of creation. OM represents the Shabda Brahmn. It is the primeval sound - pranavah/Omkara/pranava naad - the sound of the universe itself. The uttering of the sacred and mystical OM is called Onkar or Omkar. It is the sound of the origination and dissolution of the universe. The past, present, future and all that transcends time are all included in this sound. It represents that Jyotiḥ-mayaḥ/Tejasvi - Brahm-jyoti - the Divine effulgence/Cosmic Light or Light Divine (also referred to as "Brahmn"/Universal Consciousness) - emanating from Goloka-Paravyoma (the spiritual abode of Shri Hari/Krishn). ~ It is the light that impersonalists perceive in the Nirguna (unmanifested - avyaktah/Niraakar)mode of God/Almighty. Lord Narayan is the personification/manifestation (Omswaroop) of OM or AUM. Thus, He is Hariom. He is Omprakash - light of OM, light of the world. ~ The Gayatri Mantra (one of the most auspicious and oldest of mantras) is a prayer to this Jyotiḥ-mayaḥ/Tejasvi (effulgent Brahmn/Brahma-jyoti) as well as to the Pratyaksha-Brahmn - the Sun (jyotiḥ, Sūrya, Aaditya) ~ without whom there can be no life on the earth-plane. [~ Technically speaking, what promotes life is the energy of the sun. The rays from the sun not only support life, but the rays of the sun are indeed the source of life itself.] ~ Enhance the efficacy of the life principles, including one's body, mind and soul. ~ Visualize the sun's rays streaming forth into your body, mind and soul... guiding you through the path of illumination (sūrya-dvāreṇa): || AUM Bhur Bhuvah Svaha Tat Savitur Varenyam Bhargo Devasya Dhimahi Dhiyoyonah Prachodayat[link2] || ~ Pronounced:|| OHM BUR BOO-VAH SVA-HA TAHT SAH-VEE-TOOR VAHR-EHN-YUM BHAHR-GO DEH-VAHS-YAH DEE-MAH-HEE DEE-YOH YOHN-AH PRAH-CHOD-DAH-YAHT || ~ OM. I revere the Divine Self who illuminates the three worlds - physical, astral and causal; I offer my prayers to that God who shines like the Sun. May He enlighten our intellect. [Alternatively:"O Lord, You are the protector of life and of breath, dispeller of miseries and bestower of happiness. You are the creator and the most acceptable intelligence, possessing eternal qualities. May Your qualities and Your inspiration pass to us."] | The Gayatri Mantra is also known as Savitr Mantra; Savitr means the Sun, the majestic effulgent Sun-god (jyotiḥ, Sūrya, Aaditya) - Pratyaksh/Manifest-Brahmn ~ without whom there can be no life on the earth-plane. The Sun-god stands for an embodiment of knowledge, prosperity, spiritual light, wisdom, intellectual illumination, and so on. 

The Gayatri mantra is considered one of the most universal of all mantras, invoking the universal Brahmn/Universal Consciousness as the principle of knowledge and the illumination of the primordial Sun. ~ BG 10.35: || gāyatrī chandasām aham || ~ I am Gāyatrī mantra among the Vedic mantras. [Krishn is essentially indicating that He is the manifestation of that universal Brahmn ~ refer the earlier part of the post to know more about Brahmn - the Absolute, Cosmic Light or Light Divine.] Here are some of the meanings embedded in this mantra:

Bhur
(earth) / Pranaswaroop
Bhuvah
(atmosphere) / Dukh Nashak
Swaha
(heavens) / Sukh Swaroop
Tat
(that)
Savitur
(of the source) / Tejasvi
Varenyam
(to be held sacred) / Shresht
Bhargo
(light) / Paap-nashak
Devasya
(of the effulgent) / Divyo ko
Dhimahi
(we meditate on) / Dharan karen
Dhiyo
(that illumined intelligence,
wisdom) / Buddhi ko
Yo
(which) / Jo
Nah
(us) / Hamari
Prachodayat
(inspires) / Prerit kare


~ BG 4:42: || tasmād ajñāna-sambhūtaḿ hṛt-sthaḿ jñānāsinātmanaḥ chittvainaḿ saḿśayaḿ yogam ātiṣṭhottiṣṭha bhārata|| ~ Therefore, sever the ignorant doubt (ego, ignorance, vainglory, etc) in your heart with the sword of self-knowledge. Observe your discipline (i.e. duty, responsibility; in other words: to imbibe the essence of dharma/inner detachment/actions that lead to the greater good + karm-yog). Arise. (i.e. shun ennui, tardiness or slothfulness, despondency, pessimism, and so on. Embrace karm-yog - for the betterment of society.) ~ Here, Krishn is (also) advising us to awaken Kundalini. ~ The dynamism in us is also Fire*. The Kundalini 'Fire' causes enlightenment of the brain cells. But enflaming the Kundalini 'Fire' requires service to the fellow beings, to the society (selfless/non-glory-seeking/nishkam service/action... that helps build a better society.) ~ One has to dedicate oneself to nishkam karm (selfless/non-glory-seeking karm)... without which the Kundalini 'Fire' is not ignited/'awakened'. ~ Agni (auspicious effulgence, Light Divine) exists as Cosmic Fire, Solar Fire and as Frictional Fire. The Kundalini Fire is Frictional Fire, when it is below the diaphragm. When it is above the diaphragm, it is already Solar Fire, and when it reaches the brain, it is Electric Fire (brilliant white). ~ As one progresses regularly (in nishkam karm/selfless, non-glory-seeking action/service for the benefit of humanity and human society), the brilliance of the 'Golden disc' grows. Just as the morning Sun (Golden in colour) grows to brilliant white, the 'Golden disc/chakra' visualized at the eyebrow centre rises to Ajnea center/chakra and shines forth like a diamond disc/chakra. ~ This is the final state of the Kundalini 'Fire'. When this 'chakra' opens, it is deemed as the opening of the (symbolic) Third Eye (Ajna Chakra)*. ~ Only when human beings gain enlightenment (the state of complete wisdom) - i.e. when the Sahasrara Chakra (the [metaphoric/symbolic] thousand-petalled Lotus) within the brain (behind the forehead) opens up fully... the kundalini power has been fully awakened. ~ Krishn is associated with the mind, heart and soul/spirit. (For Sudarshan Chakra - do refer to the later parts of this post, as well as to the paragraphs mentioning Shahasrara Chakra.) The Krishn-avatar (the 8th Vishnu) and the Kalki-avatar (Krishna-Kalkiḥ; the 10th Vishnu, the final avatar of the Dasavatara -keshava dhrta-kalki-sharira - Krishn as Kalkiḥ); is associated with Kundalini (and the Sahasrara: the 7th chakra/the crown chakra - the highest chakra). [~ This maybe 'coz when Krishn arrived some amount of degeneration/decay had set in. (Hence, Dvapar is called 'Copper Age'). ... He not only 'closed' Dvapar but also put things on an upward trajectory - Kaliyug (Kali means bud/flower). Thereafter, the collective karm-yog of humanity/human society continued on this path. ~ However, the 10thVishnu is expected to arrive when the negative aspects (i.e. the ghor Kaliyug phase/the 'Iron Age' of ignorance/stagnation/decay) will be at its peak. 'Iron Age' is a metaphor to indicate the extent of all-round stagnation and decay. (Thus, the end of Kaliyug - euphemistically known as 'Iron Age'/ghor Kaliyug phase is considered as the most degenerate/degraded (worst) of all ages/yugs.) ~ The 10th Vishnu is (therefore) Renaissance Man/Yug Purush... who will not only 'close' Kaliyug (including the 'Iron Age'/ghor Kaliyug phase), but also set the stage for the (metaphoric 'Golden Age' - the best of eras/ages/yugs - Sat/Satya/Krita Yug of the next cycle/Maha-Yug to manifest.) However, for a complete renewal/renaissance, kundalini awakening is vital. And so, a confluence of dharma and karm-yog is important. ~ Thus, Krishn's advice is perennial/ever-relevant. [Note:The Kalki-avatar is depicted as a 'lone warrior' (not to be construed as 'one-man show'); it is simply a sign of the times; since ghor Kaliyug phase or the 'Iron Age' of ignorance/stagnation/decay will be at its peak... he alone will 'pull chestnuts out of the fire' (i.e. be a dispeller of Troubles/Calamity/Sankat, a Pathfinder); everyone else will be too busy working at cross-purposes and/or in pursuit of narrow/parochial interests. ~ Hence, many regard the Kalkiḥ-avatar (Krishna-Kalki) as Krishn+ (as the best form of the Krishn-avatar), as well as the best of the Dasavatara. ~ But then, Krishn and Kalkiḥ are a continuation.] ~ || Sri Krishna Govind Hare Murare, Heye Nath Narayan, Vasudeva, Tribhuvan ke Swami, Sakha Hamare, Heye Nath Narayan Vasudeva || [Note: Hare = dispeller [Haran] of Troubles/Calamity/Sankat, Pathfinder; Murare = metaphor for calamity/sankat. Govind = the (allegorical/metaphoric) shepherd to his flock. Vasudeva = Lord of the Earth/Father of the World. Tribhuvan ke Swami = Lord of Creation/Sovereign of the Universe. Narayan = benefactor of mankind/human society/civilization. Sakha hamare = eternal friend, guide and well-wisher of humanity. Nath = Cosmic Ruler/Guardian.] 

*The (symbolic) "third eye" (very likely) indicates the Ajna chakra (Brow Chakra, the 6th chakra, the third eye chakra ~ denoting spiritual guidance.) It is also known as the "divya chakshu" (the divine eye) or the eye of knowledge. The third eye chakra is located in the brain, directly behind the eyebrow center at the top of spinal chord i.e. at the medulla oblongata. A two-petalled lotus symbolizes Ajna chakra. The left petal represents the moon or the ida nadi and the right petal represents the sun or the pingala nadi ~ which meet the central Sushumna nadi (channel; one of the body's main energy channels) before rising to the crown chakra, Sahasrara (~ the 7th chakra/the crown chakra - the highest chakra). Within the (symbolic) two-petalled lotus is a perfectly round circle that symbolizes the "shoonya" or the void - i.e. the state completely devoid of ego/ahamkara. In this circle the symbol OM is written. 'OM' is the mantra and the symbol of ajna chakra (the "third eye"). ~ Krishn is depicted with a symbolic 'golden disc' indicating third eye chakra. [Sushumna awakening is part of kundalini awakening. The two additional energy channels that play an important role in our energy system are "ida" and "pingala".]

~ On a separate note:*Agni (auspicious effulgence, Light Divine) also symbolically represents the spiritual fire of life and the processes of transformation. Agni is the foremost amongst purifiers - to overcome the negativism/pessimism/confusion et al clouding the hearts and minds. ~ Agni, therefore, signifies renewal/re-energizing.

The 'chakra' in Sudarshan Chakra (do also read about the Sahasrara Chakradiscussed earlier in the post) - is a reference to the mind chakra or Manasa Chakra (Mind Lotus), which is connected with most of the head (especially the brain), it is a combination of sensing and intellect. That's the ability to see and hear the world, to make sense of things, sort them out, and figure out how they all fit together. Possibly this is the intellect and intuition aspect of the (metaphoric/symbolic) Third Eye. (Su = good, auspicious. Darshan/darshanah = appearance. It refers to Krishna's charismatic presence, personality, intelligence, wisdom, sentience, sagacity, foresight and handsome looks. Sudarshanah: He whose meeting is auspicious. ~ Thus, Sudarshan Chakra is a reference to Krishn's Kundalini power... that awakens the Sahasrara Chakra, the 7th chakra - the crown chakra/the highest chakra. ~ Krishna's symbolic 'golden disc' is indicative of third eye chakra - the Ajna Chakra or 6th Chakra.) [Note: The correct spelling of chakra is cakra, though pronounced with a ch. ~ The word is also a metaphor for the sun, and denotes the eternal cycle of time (kaalah) called the kalacakra, or wheel of time. Chakra = wheel. ~ The name is derived from the Sanskrit word for "wheel" or "turning". Both Krishn and Gautama Buddh spoke about karm-yog/karma and dharma/dhamma. ... The word Dharmachakra, or the "Wheel of Dharma", is often used to describe the teachings/message of Shri Gautam Buddh (the 9th Vishnu). In other words: his teachings/message is expressed as: "the turning of the wheel of dharma." ~ This wheel/chakra is now our national emblem (Ashok Chakra).] (Do read link- for more details on Cakravartin.) ~ A Cakravartin-raja (a 'wheel-turning ruler') is considered a wise, progressive, inclusive and ideal king, since he upholds Raj-dharma. Shri Ram was a Cakravartin-raja, while Shri Krishn too was a Cakravartin by dint of his actions/karm. (Thus, both upheld Raj-dharma). ~ The Buddh-avatar arrived when Kaliyug was still in full bloom (though some amount of withering may have commenced); he shared his teachings/message with the ordinary people - as a guide, teacher, mentor and reformer; thus, he too (in a manner of speaking) upheld Raj-dharma. ~ While the Kalki-avatar is expected to arrive when the ghor Kaliyug phase (i.e. the 'Iron Age' of ignorance/stagnation/decay etc) is at its peak: at yuga-sandhyāyām (~ at the conjunction of two yugs - Kaliyug of the current cycle and Sat/Satya/Krita Yug of the next cycle/Maha-Yug.

... The transition from Kaliyug to Sat/Satya/Krita Yug will not merely be an intra-yugtransition (i.e. from one yug/era to another yug/era within a Chatur-yug/Maha-Yug.) ~ Instead: it will herald the 'closure' of an entire "Maha-Yug"; in other words: it will signify the 'closure' of a complete Chatur-yug/Maha-Yug or four-yug cycle... and the commencement/transition into a whole new one. [Note: a Chatur-Yug or Maha-Yug refers to a four-yug cycle: Sat/Satya/Krita, Treta, Dvapar and Kaliyug. ~ Thus the 'closure' of kaliyug will mean a transition from one "Maha-Yug" to an entirely new one; ~ from the lowest point/ghor Kaliyug phase/the 'Iron Age' of ignorance/stagnation/decay to the 'Golden Age' of Sat/Satya/Krita Yug - the best of eras/yugs.] ~ In other words: a complete renaissance; from the lowest point (the ghor Kaliyug phase, also known as the most degraded/degenerate of all ages/eras/yugs) to the best of eras/ages/yugs (Sat/Satya/Krita Yug). | ~ This reshaping/transformation of humanity/human society indicates a whole new era, a new age, a renewal, a new "dawn"; humanity/human society/civilization will have to find its rhythm - gradually, incrementally... slow but steady - through patience and collective effort. This will enable/allow it to "heal"... so as to rejuvenate/reinvigorate itself sufficiently enough to find its mojo (~ which in turn will [gradually] lead to all-round progress and prosperity - a better human society/civilization). | ~ However, instant transformation is impractical; it is akin to putting a lump of fine gold (signifying 'Golden Age' - Sat/Satya/Krita Yug) into a glass of water. The gold will remain gold; the water will remain water. ~ This is because... the ghor Kaliyug phase (euphemistically known as the 'Iron Age' of ignorance/stagnation/decay) is characterized by considerable pessimism, despondency, loss of hope, confusion, delusion, apathy, 'toxin'/halahala, decay, and so on; thus, perception/cognitive abilities get dulled, intellectual capacity dims, stagnation/apathy/ennui/indifference et al holds sway. [~ Sat or Satya means: Eternal, Ultimate Truth: Satya-Sundar/ Satyam-Shivam-Sundaram. ~ A reference to Lord Narayan/Vishnu/Harih.] ~ Only a maha-avatar can lift humanity (human society/civilization) from zero level or rather sub-zero level; i.e. from the lowest point - from considerable ignorance/stagnation/decay etc (signifying the metaphoric 'quicksand'/'mud'/quagmire)... and put it back on an upward trajectory; only a maha-avatar has the capacity/caliber/ability to be that catalyst: to prevent a collapse of basic structure of mankind, to prevent humanity (and/or the planet's) slide into 'quicksand'/quagmire (or to pull it out from one) - to re-energize... to set the ball rolling, so to speak. [~ And, this should help us understand what the Varaha-avatar (the unicorn boar) indicates; this avatar is regarded as the supreme form of Lord Narayan/Vishnu/Hari. ... Incidentally, the current kalpa is known as "Svhetavaraha Kalpa". (Svheta = white. Varaha = the great boar.)] 

... Maybe this should help us understand what has been meant by: Lord Dhanvantari (Sudarshana Vasudev Dhanvantari) "emerged" during "samudra-manthan" holding the pot of celestial nectar (of immortality). [Now celestial nectar (of immortality) is not literal.] ~ The Supreme Druid (primordial God of healthcare) is well-wisher and benefactor of humanity. He is the "healer" of Jiva-souls (the individual/human souls/finites); he arrives to administer aoushata (medicine, cure, remedy) so that human society can (gradually) regain its health and vigour (as per: yada yada hi dharmasya glanir bhavati bharata abhyutthanam adharmasya tadatmanam srjamy aham ~ whenever and wherever societal 'churn'/manthan/turmoil becomes too difficult... so much so that humanity is 'paralyzed'/bewildered, unable to find a solution/direction, or is in free-fall... hurtling towards an abyss/'quicksand'/quagmire... only then, He manifests Himself - to stem the 'churn'/manthan, to stabilize (and to re-energize). ... Umm, does it have something to do with the story of Lord Shiva holding the River Ganga in his jata [dredlocks] to minimize the impact (devastation) of her fall - to become Byomkesh? Is this story allegorical? ~ My guess is as good as yours. ~ Lord Shiva (Hara/Sankara) is also known as Vaidyanatha (Lord of Remedies). ... And, maybe, all this can (also) help us understand what has been meant by: "Neelkanth" ('the blue-throated one') - who soaks up 'halahala' or 'kaalkoot' (resulting out of immense societal 'manthan'/churn/'dark clouds that engulf the hearts and minds') - for the benefit of human society/mankind ~ to enable it to "heal" and evolve/transform - so that it can function better, progress and prosper. [~ 'Halahala' or 'Kaalkoot' is the most vicious (metaphoric) "toxin" - that would otherwise destroy humanity/human society/civilization... if allowed to accumulate. ~ Only a maha-avatar has the capacity to be that selfless ~ to become "Neelkanth" - the allegorical blue-throated one.) ~ Thus, Hari-Hara (these are two aspects/ do refer to the next paragraph - for more details.) | Thus, rudranam sankaras casmi (~ "Of all the Rudras I am Sankara" [Lord Shiva]). | ... Thus, keshavah: one who is himself the three: kah Brahma, ah Vishnu and Isa Shiva; in other words: Satyam-Shivam-Sundaram. | ~ Narayan means: well-wisher and benefactor of mankind (nara). Harih/Hari means: fire/energy (auspicious effulgence, Light Divine - it renews/re-energizes/rejuvenates/revitalizes.) Hari also means: Lord of Nature/Earth. ... And, since Lord Narayan/Vishnu is (also) protector and preserver (a guiding, stabilizing entity) Hari or Hare also means: Dispeller [Haran] of Troubles/Calamity/Sankat, a Pathfinder. Hara also means: Dispeller [Haran] of Troubles/Calamity/Sankat. ~ While Bhoota/Bhuta Nath means: Lord/Guardian/Protector of Mankind.

Note: ~ Keshavah - one who is himself the three: kah Brahma (Universal Consciousness, Omswaroop; creator/usherer of a new "dawn"/era/yug; re-energizer/Renaissance Man/Yug Purush), ah Vishnu (protector and preserver/stabilizing factor) and Isa Shiva (destroyer/dispeller of calamity/sankat/troubles; the allegorical "Neelkanth"). Therefore, Keshavah is: Satyam-Shivam-Sundaram (do refer the relevant passage on Satyam-Shivam-Sundaram). | ~ BG 10.23: || rudranam sankaras casmi || ~ "Of all the Rudras I am Sankara" [Lord Shiva]. ~ Therefore, Rudra-Siva. [They are not different entities.] ~ And so, Hari-Hara/Vishnu-Rudra/Hari-Sankara may not have been three different entities. ~ Hari-Krishna himself is Shiva/Hara/Rudra/Sankara simultaneously. ~ Shivah is used for both Hari and Hara. Shivah means: the kindly auspicious one; one who is eternally pure; a kind herdsman (shepherd) of jiva-souls (jiva or humans/ living beings = bhutanam) ~ Shivah does not mean destroyer-destroyer; this aspect (i.e. the Shiva/Sankara/Rudra/Hara aspect) of Hari-Krishn indicates: destroyer/dispeller of troubles/calamities/Sankat - of humanity/human society, as well as dispeller/destroyer of ego/vanity/vainglory, ignorance, illusion, delusion, confusion, 'toxin' (~ thus he is known as Neelkanth - the allegorical 'blue-throated one'; he soaks up negativism - for the good of humanity/society - to enable it to function (progress and prosper), and so on. [PS: Since Hari-Krishn himself is Hari-Hara/Vishnu-Rudra/Hari-Sankara, therefore, Virupaksha (oblique eyes) is used for both the aspects: the Hari (aspect) as well as the Hara (aspect). Both are auspicious. ~ Rudraksha means: eye of Rudra (Rudra-Siva/Hara/Sankara). ... So, whether Virupaksha and Rudraksha have different meanings or not ~ my guess is as good as yours. Hari/Hara/Hare also means: destroyer/dispeller of troubles/calamities/Sankat - of humanity/human society; in other words: one who protects and preserves (stabilizes).] 

BG 4.7: || yada yada hi dharmasya glanir bhavati bharata abhyutthanam adharmasya tadatmanam srjamy aham || ~ Whenever and wherever there is an alarming decline or discrepancy in dharma/dharmic principles (for the greater good, and/or for humanity/human society/civilization to progress and prosper/flourish); or when such an alarming decline is perceived or becomes a bane; O Bharata* (addressing Arjun, who belonged to the Puru-vansh/Bharat-vansh/lineage/clan), only then, I, manifest Myself. [~ 'Avatar' means: descent, and refers to a descent of the divine into earthly form. Avatar comes from the Sanskrit avatirna: "manifest/descent from the Lord." ~ However, not every avatar is the Almighty Himself (albeit in human form); most are partial avatars or empowered entities; Lord Narayan/Vishnu/Hari's Purna Avatar (one in whom divinity is manifested fully) is Shri Hari-Krishna. ~Lord Krishna is considered as the Cosmic Person/Being in his totality of manifestation. He is not an Avatar of the Cosmic Person/Being, but is considered as the Cosmic Person/Being Himself (albeit, in human form).|| krishnas tu bhagavan svayam || He is the Cosmic Teacher and Cosmic Ruler; he is God manifest in human form (svayam Bhagavan, the 8thVishnu; the human manifestation [sagun swaroop] of Lord Vishnu/Narayan - His Purna Avatar.) ~ And, as per His stated 'dharma-samsthapanarthaya sambhavami yuge yuge' (to renew/re-energize/reinvigorate/revitalize/rejuvenate the principles of "dharma" and "karm-yog" - for the benefit of mankind/humanity ~ so as to help create/build a better [progressive, prosperous, inclusive] human society/civilization,I manifest Myself yuge-yuge, yug/age/era after yug/age/era)... Keshavah will return (assuming the form of the Kalkiḥ-avatar/kesava dhrta-kalki-sarira) to 'close' Kaliyug (including the ghor Kaliyug phase or the 'Iron Age' of ignorance/stagnation/decay), to provide guidance ~ to bring about the inter-mahayug transition (from one Maha-Yug to another Maha-Yug; from the lowest point/ghor Kaliyug phase [the 'Iron Age' of ignorance/stagnation/decay] to the best of eras/ages/yugs - the Sat/Satya/Krita Yug - the 'Golden Age' of prosperity, progress, etc.) ~ The 10th Vishnu will be indescribable (kim api). | [Note: ~ Since Dvapar to Kaliyug was an intra-yugtransition, Kaliyug began from midnight of 18 February in 3102 BC (or perhaps from the conjunction of 17/18 February 3102 BC i.e. midnight onwards) in the proleptic Julian calendar... since Krishn departed (very likely in the evening/shyam) on this date. (~ He is kaalah/time himself; therefore, when the hunter's arrow hit him on his foot, he only smiled before departing... while Jara grieved over the empty shell.) The period after his departure (midnight onwards) marked the beginning of Kaliyug. | ~ However, since the transition from Kaliyug to Sat/Satya/Krita Yug (of the next cycle) is an inter-mahayug movement/transition, it signifies the 'closure' of an entire/complete Maha-Yug and the commencement of a whole new one; so... whether this transition will be immediate or not (i.e. immediately after the departure of the 10th Vishnu or not) ~ my guess is as good as yours.]

[*Bharatavarsha means: the continent (Sanskrit: 'varsha') that is dedicated ('rata') to light, wisdom ('bha'). ~ Bharatavarsha or Bharatadesam also means, "cherished land".For the etymology of the word "Hindu" and the name "India", do read: link. ~ However, it is unlikely that the contours of modern India constituted ancient Bharatvarsha. ~ Yet another name for ancient India is  Jambudveepa or Jambadveepa. Jambu or Jamba = Indian blackberry. Maybe there was an abundance of this tree (obviously a much different version of what we have now)... and hence the name. Thus, Jambudveepa = island of the Jambu/Jambul/Indian blackberry trees. Or perhaps, ancient India was shaped like an Indian blackberry. ~ Now whether the contours of modern India constituted ancient Jambudveepa or not - my guess is as good as yours.]

Kalki/ Kalkiḥ is also referred to as: KalkinandKalaki - often a metaphor for "Eternity" or "Time". (Time is Kaalah in Sanskrit.) ~ When the 'Iron Age' of ignorance/stagnation/decay etc (i.e. the negative/ghor Kaliyug phase) will be at its peak ~ will arrive Kalkiḥ, the Lord of Creation/Sovereign of the Universe/Father of the World (nāmnā kalkir jagat-patiḥ) ... And from what we can gather, Keshavah will return as the Kalki-avatar (the 10th Vishnu, the final maha-avatar of the Dasavatara) at yuga-sandhyāyām (i.e. at the conjunction of two yugs: Kaliyug of the current cycle/Maha-Yug and Sat/Satya/Krita Yug of the next cycle/Maha-Yug; sandhyāyām = evening, dusk, twilight). ~ He will appear (prādúr) in the home (bhavanê) of Vishnuyashah/Vishnuyashas/Vishnuyash Sharma - an erudite person (Brahmanasya) and the head of Shambhala village (shambhala-grama-mukhyasya). [Now, Vishnuyashah (also, Vishnuyashas/Vishnuyash Sharma) can be a name per se, or it can also be an allegorical name - to indicate: devotee of Lord Vishnu/Narayan, etc.] The Kalkiḥ-avatar will be born to Vishnuyasha/Vishnuyash Sharma (~ Yajña, better known as Svayambhuva Manu [the first "Manu"] - who (earlier) also appeared as Raja Dasarath (Lord Ram's father - in Treta) and as Vasudev (Lord Krshn's father - in Dvapar). [Note: Shambhala = Shambhu (Shiv) + Le (of). ~ So, whether Shambhala (a Sanskrit word that to the Tibetans means "the source of happiness") was also known as Shivalaya; whether Shambhala is the land of Shambhu Nath - the Ruler (Nath) as well as Guardian/Protector of Shambhala or not; and if so, whether this Shambhu Nath is the Sankara of rudranam sankaras casmi (~ "Of all the Rudras I am Sankara") or not ~ my guess is as good as yours. (~ Shambhala is also considered to be the gateway between the physical and spiritual world ~ Haridvar? Some believe it to be the actual Manas Sarovar,  Kalilash as well as Rishikesh or 'Agni Tirtha'. It is also believed to be the real Prayag - Triveni Sangam: the confluence of the Ganga, Yamuna and the mythic Sarasvati.) | ... The Kalkiḥ-avatar's 'vehicle' is the winged horse/flying horse (Devadutta); this avatar appears like a comet (dhumaketum iva), holding a (metaphoric) brilliant/effulgent sword (known as "Ratna Maru"). ~ It is the (symbolic) "sword" of destiny, a ray of hope: signifying knowledge, discernment and wisdom - to guide; to shine a light/hold a mirror to society; to "close" the ghor Kaliyug phase, to lift the (metaphoric) "fog"/"filth" of ignorance, pessimism, confusion, delusion, 'toxin', degeneration, decay, apathy/indifference/ennui, stagnation, and so on (~ that clouds the hearts and minds... when the 'Iron Age' of ignorance/stagnation/decay - the ghor Kaliyug phase - is at its peak). ~ As per:  || Asato mā sad gamaya Tamaso mā jyotir gamaya || 

~ Asato mā sad gamaya: From ignorance/untruth, lead me unto truth (dharma/actions that result in the greater/collective good. ~ Lord Narayan/Vishnu/Hari is Satya-Sundara/ Satyam-Shivam-Sundaram.) |Tamaso mā jyotir gamaya: From stagnation (the symbolic 'fog'/'filth' of decay, delusion, ignorance, confusion, pessimism, despondency and so on), lead me unto light (towards knowledge, hope, wisdom, enlightenment, prosperity, etc) - so as to build/create [and sustain] a better/progressive/prosperous/inclusive society/ civilization.] ~ He will also guide, as well as shine a light/hold a mirror to society - to 'awaken'; for humanity to perform their collective karm-yog. | ~ BG 4:42: || tasmād ajñāna-sambhūtaḿ hṛt-sthaḿ jñānāsinātmanaḥ chittvainaḿ saḿśayaḿ yogam ātiṣṭhottiṣṭha bhārata || ~ "Therefore, sever the ignorant doubt (ego, ignorance, confusion, apathy, etc) in your heart with the sword of self-knowledge. Observe your discipline (duty, responsibility; imbibe the spirit of dharma + karm-yog). Arise." (i.e. shun ennui, tardiness or slothfulness, despondency, pessimism, and so on. Embrace [cumulative and sustained] karm-yog - for the betterment of society.) | ~ Krishn is (also) advising us to awaken Kundalini. [Do also refer to the paragraphs on Kundalini.] | ~ Thus, "Ratna Maru"is the (symbolic) sword of destiny, a ray of hope: signifying knowledge, discernment and wisdom - to guide, as well as to shine a light/hold a mirror to society; to 'awaken'; to lift the symbolic "fog"/"filth" of ignorance, pessimism, confusion, delusion, 'toxin', degeneration, decay, apathy/indifference/ennui, stagnation, and so on (~ that clouds the hearts and minds... when the 'Iron Age' of ignorance/stagnation/decay - i.e. the ghor Kaliyug phase is at its peak). ~ It is also the (symbolic) sword of self-knowledge (self-realization). [Refer to what Krishn says earlier/BG 4.42. Also refer link- for self-realization.] ~ Hence Kalkiḥ alsomeans: Annihilator of ignorance, or Dispeller of confusion (the allegoric "fog"/"filth" - clouding the hearts and minds in the ghor Kaliyug phase ~ when the 'Iron Age' of ignorance/stagnation/decay is at its peak.)

Note:In the ghor Kaliyug phase (i.e. in the 'Iron Age' of ignorance/stagnation/decay)... since there is considerable tamasic-ness (pessimism, confusion, delusion,'toxin', etc) ~ perception/cognitive abilities get dulled, comprehension and intellectual capacity dims, apathy/ennui/indifference, etc holds sway. This leads to ignorance, confusion, stagnation and decay. ~ Thus the end of Kaliyug (i.e. the ghor Kaliyug phase) is also known as the (symbolic) 'Iron Age' (of ignorance/stagnation/decay) - the 'Age of Machines'. [~ 'Machine''coz comprehension, perception/cognitive abilities [of human society] get dulled, intellectual capacity dims.] ~ It does not imply that this avatar (the Kalkiḥ-avatar/Kalkiḥ Maitreya) is a robot made of metal, but that his appearance is in the lowest phase of Kaliyug - the 'Iron Age' of Kaliyug (~ the ghor Kaliyug phase, or the [symbolic] Age of 'Machines') - an age when intellectual capacity and sentience/perception/perspective/cognitive abilities (of human society) diminishes/get dulled (falls below the minimum level). ~ Instead of being active participants in their own destiny, humanity cannot become idlers and mere spectators/bystanders [symbolic 'machines']. That will lead to a gradual all-round degeneration/stagnation/decay. This is the core of Krishn's message. | ~ BG 2.47: || karmaṇy evādhikāras te mā phaleṣu kadācana mā karma-phala-hetur bhūrmā te sańgo 'stv akarmaṇi || ~ Do your duty (i.e. imbibe the spirit of dharma/right action for the greater/collective good + collective/cumulative/concerted karm-yog) to the best of your ability. Overcome your limitations. Concentrate on your convergences. Do not highlight your divergences/differences. Shun lethargy. Overcome inertia. Be positive. Never lose hope.

....................................................................... 

The ancient Indus people couldn't have copied their town-planning from Egypt and Mesopotamia because in those civilizations the roads meandered like village streets. Nor was the writing similar to Sumer's (Sumerian Civilization - ancient Iraq, etc) cuneiform or the Egyptian (ancientMiṣr) hieroglyphics. The Harappans (the ancient Indus people) had their own distinctive style. [~ The efficient and finest of plumbing/sewage/drainage systems, a network of underground drainage was a scientific system of drainage that shows a remarkably forward thinking concern for hygiene and sanitation. The cities were so well designed that (modern) Indians have not been able to replicate the town-planning feats/achievement of the ancient Indus engineers... even five millenniums later.] ~ The greatness of the Indus Valley Civilization (the Sindhu-Sarasvati Sabhyata) can be attributed to ancient Indian genius (~ and trade was the driving force/factor.) |Excavations (though a lot remains to be excavated) have uncovered a civilization so vast in its extent that at its peak it is estimated to have encompassed a staggering 1.5 million sq km - an area larger than Western Europe. In size, it dwarfed contemporary civilizations in the Nile Valley in Egypt and in the Tigris and Euphrates valleys in Sumer (Sumerian Civilization - modern Iraq). Its geographical boundaries are now believed to extend up to the Iranian border on the west, (one site in Afghanistan), Turkmenistan and Kashmir in the north, Delhi in the east and the Godavari Valley in the south. Even extending to Rupnagar, in India, at the foot of the Shimla Hills 1,000 miles (1,600 km) to the northeast. ~ Discovery of a large cache of gold and other ornaments reportedly belonging to the Harappan period (2600-1900 BC) by the villagers of Mandi in the Muzaffarnagar District of UP (in the year 2000) has also challenged previous notions about the geographic reach of the Indus Valley civilization. ~ Two things are clear: that Indus Valley was a misnomer, and that in size it was the largest prehistoric (pracheen) urban civilization - even bigger than Pharaonic Egypt. That it was governed much like a democracy (collectivism) and the ancient Indus people were the world's top exporters. ~ What is now known as the Indus Valley Civilization included the whole of modern India. | Probably the most common design on the Indus seals is the swastika. This symbol wards off negativities. It represents the cosmic spinning vortex. The right-handed swastika symbol originated in ancient India and is the symbol of the mighty River SarasvatI as well as the Sindhu-Sarasvati Sabhyata/Civilization (possibly the oldest civilization in the world, and thus the cradle of civilization.) ~ In Sanaatan Dharma, the swastikarepresents the Universe in our own spiral galaxy in the forefinger of the Cosmic Entity (Ishvara-Ishvari/Narayan-Narayani). This carries most significance in establishing the creation of the Universe and the arms as 'kaalah' or time. [~ Also, the chakra/disc on Lord Narayan's forefinger probably indicates the galaxies; maybe all galaxies (including the Milky Way/Aakash Ganga) were disc-shaped in the beginning... and gradually opened up to assume a spiral form.]

More on the Swastika:(also refer the previous paragraph) | The term Swastika has been derived from the Sanskrit word "Svastika", which means well-being: "SU" means "good" or "auspicious,""ASTI" means "to be," and "KA" as a suffix. The swastika literally means, "to be good". Alternatively: "swa" is "higher self" (Supersoul), "asti" meaning "being", and "ka" as a suffix, so the translation can be interpreted as: "being with higher self". Suasti thus means "well-being." The suffix -kaeither forms a diminutive or intensifies the verbal meaning, and suastikamight thus be translated literally as "that which is associated with well-being," corresponding to "lucky charm" or "thing that is auspicious." Thus swastika means any lucky or auspicious object, and in particular a mark made on persons and things to denote auspiciousness, good luck or well-being. | The most traditional form of the swastika's symbolization in Sanaatan Dharma is that the symbol represents the purusharthas (representative of the Cosmic Energy - the Purusha): dharma (that which makes a human a human), artha (wealth), desire, and moksha (liberation). All four are needed for a full life. However, two (wealth and desire) are limited and can only give limited joy. They are the two closed arms of the swastika. The other two are unlimited and are the open arms of the swastika. | Swastika is considered to be a mark of auspiciousness and good fortune. Red Swastika (made with red vermilion, prepared with natural ingredients during rituals) is the sign of Sanaatan Dharma; it depicts a cross with four arms of equal lengths. The end of each of the arms is bent at a right angle. At times, dots are also added between the arms. The right-facing swastika (Sanskrit: Svastika) in the decorative form is used to evoke sacred force. [~ Shri Ganesh has the Swastika on his palm. The swastika is at times considered a symbolic representation of Shri Ganesh (Vignesh or Vighna-Vinashak - the remover of obstacles) and is hence offered first offerings in every puja. The swastika is made with red vermilion (prepared with natural ingredients) during rituals.] | The Swastika is a symbol of good fortune in Buddhism. It represents the footprints and heart of Shri Gautam Buddh. Thus, it is considered to be very holy and extensively brought to use by Buddhists. In the images of Shri Gautam Buddh, the Swastik is imprinted on his chest, palms and feet. In Jainism, Swastika represents the Seventh Jina, more popularly known as the Tirthankara Suparsva. It is one of the most prominent auspicious symbols of the present era. In the cultural traditions of Svetambar Jains, Swastika is one of the main symbols of the ashta-mangalas. |Ganesh - represents a set of qualities; is very likely a reference to the most intelligent, perceptive and wise person. Shri Ganesh represents: great retention power or vast intelligence (as symbolized by the elephant head and elephant's memory). The elephant-head: represents calm disposition, intelligence, perceptiveness, knowledge and wisdom. The small eyes = concentration. The small mouth and the bent trunk (Vakra-Tunndda) = less noise, more efficiency (opposite of 'empty vessels makes the most noise'). The bent trunk indicates: one who is not given to boasting or talking unnecessarily; in other words: one who is not ignorant. The big elephant ears = great listening ability ('listening', and not merely 'hearing').] 

On a separate note:"Hindu" is not the name of any "religion" or a set of religious beliefs whatsoever... it was simply a label for a specific landmass; at best the word simply implied someone associated with (or dwelling in) the geographical area the boundaries of which were roughly covered by the SarasvatI-Sindhu Rivers and their tributaries. [Sindhu is Sanskrit for the River Indus.] ~ "Hindu" is simply the variant of Sindhu (the mighty River Indus, perhaps the largest of all rivers in the world after the Nile - Sanskrit: Nilah or Neel). |The Indus (River Sindhu) issues from a lion's mouth. Hence that river is called Sinh ka bab. the lion's gate or mouth. ~ The once-mighty River Indus, it is said, originates from the mouth of a lion (Senge Khabab or "Lion's Mouth")- a perennial spring - in Tibet. (Possibly a mountain snout shaped like a lion's mouth.) Thus, it is also called Sengge Tsangpo or Lion River. This river is a common lifeline, and symbolically binds the people of more than the one nation. Few rivers in the world flow through as stunning a landscape as the Sindhu (River Indus). It flows through plains, villages, hamlets and towns, as well as by valleys, gorges and peaks of countless hues. | The word "Hindu" came about courtesy the ancient Persians (another class of Aryans), who - due to a lack of appropriate phonetics (in their language) - called the people living east of them as "Hindu". ~ In Old Persian... the 'S' for Sindhu becomes 'H' (due to a lack of phonetics). Therefore: the Vedic Sapta Sindhavaḥ or Sapta Sindhu became Hapta HAndu. ~ Thus, 'Hindu' is derived from the Persian 'HAndu', which in turn is derived from 'Sindhu'. ~ The people living around the River Indus, and on the east of the River Indus (Sindhu) followed a pattern of life that was distinct. Thus, "Hindu Dharma" is another name for "Arya Dharma". [Arya = noble or noble-natured; based on noble values, principles, and so on. Dharma = path or 'way of life'; Arya Dharma = a pattern of life based on noble tenets/values/principles... that resulted and/or contributed towards the greater good and therefore, a better society. Not that there were any dos and don'ts, Aryan-ness was their 'way of life'.] |Did "Persia" evolve from "Parshva" (meaning: 'next door', 'neighbouring' or 'nearby')? Did the ancient Indus people (Hindu people) call the people of the first/neighbouring port by the Sanskrit word "Parshva"? Did the ancient Persians in turn (also) refer to the ancient Indus people and/or those living to the east of them as "Prachya" (meaning: 'Eastern' or Eastern Country) - the Greek Praesii? ~ We can only speculate. 

Bharatavarsha means: the continent (Sanskrit: 'varsha') that is dedicated ('rata') to light, wisdom ('bha'). ~ Bharatavarsha or Bharatadesam also means, "cherished land". ~ However, it is unlikely that the contours of modern India constituted ancient Bharatvarsha. |Yet another name for ancient India is  Jambudveepa or Jambadveepa. Jambu or Jamba = Indian blackberry. Maybe there was an abundance of this tree (very likely a much different version of what we have now)... and hence the name. ... Thus, Jambudveepa = island of the Jambu/Jambul/Indian blackberry trees. Or perhaps, ancient India was shaped like an Indian blackberry. ~ Now whether the contours of modern India constituted ancient Jambudveepa or not - my guess is as good as yours.

Genesis of the name "India": In ancient times, the entire Indus river system (along with its seven tributaries - Sutudri or Satadruor SuturI (Sutlej), VipASa (Beas), AsiknI/Chandrabhaga (Chenab), ParuSNI (Ravi), VitastA (Jhelum) and the now lost River SarasvatI) and the area it covered, was called "Sapta Sindhu" (the Vedic Sapta Sindhavaḥ) i.e. the land of seven rivers ("Sindhu" means river,stream or ocean in Sanskrit). The word "Sindhu" not only referred to the river system and adjoining area but also became the label to denote the culture that had developed along its valleys. [The "Indus Valley Civilization" should more accurately be called the Sarasvati-Sindhu Civilization considering the landmass where it developed).] ~ Thus, courtesy the ancient Persians... to the world beyond, the area around the Sarasvati-Sindhu rivers and its culture came to be known as the area of "Hindus" (thus the name "Hindustan" which literally means the land of "Hindus". (Stan = land or place in Persian. Similar to Sthan in Sanskrit. ~ The similarity between "Stan" and "Sthan" is again due to theancient Avestan Persian-Sanskrit connection which go back a long way.) ~ This nomenclature stuck and became particularly prevalent after the arrival of the Mughals. The Mughals (based on the earlier Persian terminology) used the term "Hindu" to refer to the original inhabitants of the land and this label became the way to distinguish the indigenous/ancient culture from theirs. ~ When the Greeks first reached the river plains of the Punjab, they borrowed the name of the region (Hindu) from the Persians and simply modified it to "Indós". "Indós" later morphed into "Indus" in Latin - by which name the river is still known in the West. [The ancient Greeks referred to the ancient Indians as Indói, the people of the Indus.] The Romans began to call the whole landmass after this river and thus the name "India" came to stay ~ which has been the form used by Europeans over the ages. ~ Thus the word "India" too is derived from the River Indus.

Incidentally, the SarasvatI is (also) called "she with seven sisters" (saptasvasā), indicating a group of eight rivers. ~ The 'Sapta Sindhu' ("seven rivers" - Vedic Sapta Sindhavaḥ; "Sindhu" means river,stream or ocean in Sanskrit) refers to the rivers SarasvatI, SuturI (Sutlej), VipASa (Beas), AsiknI (Chenab), ParuSNI (Ravi), VitastA (Jhelum) and Sindhu (Indus); probably the (missing river is) KubhA. Among these, the rivers SarasvatI and the Sindhu were considered the most sacred. [Though the Vedic SarasvatI is now lost, yet many believe that it still flows below the ground.] And, of all the Vedic rivers, the Sindhu is both masculine and feminine. [A masculine river is called "Nad", a feminine one "Nadi".] | Apart from its striking cultural continuity with subsequent diversification, transformation, assimilation and evolution of Indian civilization, which makes up a total tapestry of (at least) 10,000 years (~ since much of the excavation is yet to happen), the ancient Indus people exhibited the following traits: an enterprising spirit, a knowledge-based and forward-looking culture, a remarkable adaptability to changing conditions, a spiritual content, and, most importantly, a capacity for a broader view, without which such a vast area could not have had such a cultural affinity (and all-round progress and flourishing trade) free from major hiccups. | However, post the decline of the Gupta era - in the absence of a Chakravartin (do read the relevant passages on Cakravartin and 'Cakravartin system of governance/administration') - the years were marked by a lack of intellectual stimulation, gradual all-round stagnation... and (eventual) decay. India lost her preeminence in all aspects and areas. Ancient India was no longer the seat of innovation and learning. ~ Also, the feeling of oneness and internal unity (yog/sanyog/confluence) despite the myriad diversity (gradually and steadily) unraveled... all kinds of fissures, schisms and fault-lines appeared/developed/came about; Arya Dharma and the social fabric woven around it too came apart. ... In the absence of a nucleus (a shared roadmap/framework/architecture/vision) and a guiding and binding force/factor (a Cakravartin) - the post Gupta era India (gradually and steadily) went adrift. | Vigjnana - in the (ancient) Indian thought/system - was never boring or cut-and-dried narrative. For our ancients, science did not signify a mechanistic analysis of facts, but rather a broader interpretation, a wider perception of the universe. ~ The combination of our ancient enlightened wisdom, guidance, philosophy, art, literature et al alongside science, math, research and innovation... is what brought seekers of knowledge (both students and learned persons alike) from distant lands. They went away enriched... carrying with them a piece of ancient India. Thus, Indian thought and knowledge illumined the minds of denizens of far-off lands. ~ It was the route to/of ancient India's preeminence. It helped establish 'yoga' or 'sanjog' (connect/confluence) - cutting across distance and diversities. As a result, trade too flourished. While labour-intensive activities... that not only generated employment and revenue, but also nurtured creativity (concentration and application of mind), was aplenty. Besides, our ancient Brahmanas (learned persons) were very welcoming of synergy-creation. Hence they (also) studied the works of the ancient Greeks and the Romans... and then wrote and shared their own comments, treatises and views on them. And so, there was no stagnation or intellectual regimentation (leading to a gradual intellectual degeneration and decay ~ a veritable 'quicksand'... emerging from which is a mammoth task.) | ~ The decline of Takshashila marked the decline in Indian education, thought and structure. Fewer and fewer knowledge-seekers, students and travelers made the trip to India. ... Earlier, the world looked to India for answers, the post-Gupta era India floundered.

~ The SarasvatI River is an important river goddess in the Rig Ved ~ whose banks served as fertile soil for the growth of ancient Vedic culture. ... Devi Sarasvati is wisdom personified. ~ In the Rig Ved, SarasvatI is a river as well as its personification as a goddess. [Veda(meaning wisdom, knowledge) comes from the root "vid" - to know. Veda has in turn given rise to "Vidya", which also means: knowledge.] |The Balinese Goddess Vac is associated with purification (cleansing, tidiness), protection, offerings and communication; She is believed to be a dispeller of negativities/negativism. Artistic renderings depict Goddess Vac as an elegant, graceful golden-skinned woman dressed in gold (an allusion to solar energy). *In Her secondary capacity (aspect) as a mother Goddess, She is depicted as a cow. | Vāk or Vāc is the Sanskrit word for "speech", "voice", "talk", or "language", from a verbal root vac-"speak, tell, utter". Personified, Vāk is a Goddess; She is also frequently identified with Bharati or Sarasvati, the Goddess of speech. ~ DeviSarasvati is also known as Vakdevi (Goddess of speech) or Vani. She is described in the Rig Ved as not only speech (vāk) itself, but also as truth (satya/eternal or timeless essence/knowledge - para vidya) and perception, which allows humans to turn divine knowledge into words. Goddess Sarasvati is worshipped by the Balinese people in Indonesia. She is a prominent figure in Buddhist iconography as well. In Japan, Sarasvati is known by different names. She is associated with different faculties like music, prosperity, grace/elegance, happiness, eloquence, and wisdom and as one who confer strength on warriors (~ this form of Sarasvati is worshipped by generals before going into battle). Sarasvati and Her forms are popular divinities in Japan. In one of Her form, She is an inspirer to poets and artistes; in another, for talent and willpower; in yet another, she is associated with Speech - and depicted with a flute in her hands (reminiscent of Sri Krishn?) The Martial form (reminiscent of Goddess Parvati?) is worshipped by generals before going to war.  ~ Therefore, can it be inferred that the so-called Indus Valley Civilization stretched up to Bali - in the Far East? ~ My guess is as good as yours| Indus Valley Civilization is a misnomer; it should be called "Aryavarsha" instead (~ abode of the Aryans/Arya people;the Land of the Noble Ones; Arya = noble, noble natured, or people who followed a pattern of life based on noble values. Varsha = the continent (Sanskrit). ~ Across this wide swathe of land (much of which may have also been part of the Rama Empire), there was no cultural homogeneity or monolithicism, whatsoever. There was a diverse mix of population too... and so, people of varied physical appearance/features peopled this civilization. And yet, an underlying cultural affinity existed - a shared 'way of life', history, experience, knowledge, know-how, trade, and so on. ~ Thus, our unity in diversity go back a long way. | The emphasis has been on acceptance and assimilation, not the condescending/superiority-complex-inducing 'tolerance'.] 

[*The Balinese Goddess Vac, in Her secondary capacity (aspect) as a mother Goddess, is depicted as a cow. (Refer the above paragraph.) | Devi Sarasvati is Varadey Kaamarupinee (the fulfiller of wishes) and is associated with literature, arts, crafts, music, etc. ~ BG 10.28: || dhenūnām asmi kāmadhuk || ~ "among cows I am the surabhi" (also known as kamadhenu ~ possibly a metaphor for prosperity, etc.) | So, can it be inferred that Devi Sarasvati and Lord Krishn are one and the same? | And if so, then this Devi Sarasvati - the river goddess (river as well as its personification as a goddess) - is also Devi Parvati in another form? ~ And therefore, the other Devi Sarasvati is a namesake? ~ My guess is as good as yours. [A stotra from the Devi Mahatmyam: Yaa Devii Sarva-Bhutessu Buddhi-Ruupenna Samsthitaa | Namas-Tasyai Namas-Tasyai Namas-Tasyai Namo Namah ||8|| ~ 8.1:To that Devi Who in All Beings is Abiding in the Form of Intelligence, 8.2:Salutations to Her, Salutations to Her, Salutations to Her, Salutations again and again. | Also, who is Lord Shiva? The same as Krishn/Sarasvati/Parvati? | Can it be that there were many Shiva(s), and this caused various narratives to confluence and merge? | ~ BG 10.23: || rudranam sankaras casmi || ~ "Of all the Rudras I am Sankara" [Lord Shiva]. ~ Therefore, can it be that the Shiva who is revered and worshipped (as Sankara, Byomkesh, Rudra-Siva, Neelkanth - the allegoric 'blue-throated one' - who soaks in negativism for the good/betterment of humanity ~ to allow it to function, progress and prosper, etc) is the same entity as Krishn/Sarasvati/Parvati? Just another form? Different time? ~ And that, Parvati's consort is simply a namesake Shiva? ~ My guess is as good as yours. (Shiva means the kindly, auspicious one; one who is eternally pure/self-realized, i.e. one who has gained the eternal bliss/spiritual ecstasy [Sat-cit-ānanda] of self-realization.) Do also refer the passages on kundalini. ~ The depiction of Shiva is probably allegorical; e.g. the tiger-skin perhaps indicates his courageous nature/valiance. Also, the Ganga cannot flow from his dredlocks (jata) - at least not literally; maybe it is a reference to Akash Ganga - the Milky Way? ~ The milky way galaxy itself was seen as the path of aryaman (the noble one) or the ganges (the name etymologically related to going) of the sky (akash-ganga). | Byomkesh: it is derived from byom/vyom(sky or air) and kesh (hair). ~ Lord Shiva received into his dredlocks (jata) the Ganga - to minimize the immense impact (devastation) of her fall. It is the (metaphoric/allegoric) tide/torrent of the Ganga that Lord Shiva is supposed to have held in his jata (dredlocks) and (thus) become Byomkesh. (This Ganga is a metaphor; it cannot be a reference to a river per se.) ~ Perhaps it is an allegory to indicate that his actions saved/protected humanity from great misery and/or mitigated (in force or intensity) the long-term damage. Maybe, it brought about a positive change of course and lay the foundation for a new and better society to emerge.] 

~ Also, large parts of the 'Shiv-Sati' story (very likely) describes some cosmic event; 'Shiva wandering about in the cosmos with Sati's lifeless body on his shoulders' - is a description (in the style of story-telling) of some cosmic event. ... Maybe pieces of meteors and/or other celestial debris rained down on earth... and this (gradually) gave rise to our 'Shakti Peeths'. (Though a few of the 'Shakti Peeths' probably is in honour of some or the other great woman. Or [maybe] both. That is: Celestial debris + a great human.) ~ The Shiva (of the 'Shiva-Sati' story) and the Shiva of 'Shiva-Parvati' story may not have been the same person. And both these Shiva(s) and the Shiva of Sankara/Rudra-Siva/Byomkesh too may not have been the same. ~ However, with the passage of time, all the stories/narratives, etc have converged and even fused together (perhaps due to a similarity in names). ~ Perhaps, there could be 'Asta-Matrikas' (the Eight Forms of Parvati) and other female deities; but having multiple Shiva(s) would have been confusing; and so, when Sanaatan Dharma assimilated temples and worship of idols (from the Greeks and perhaps even the Buddhists)... the various Shiva(s) were fused into a single figure. ~ My guess is as good as yours.

On a separate note:It is because of these inspirational female avatars that generations of people ~ have been relatively free from troglodytism, vis-à-vis women. Being accustomed to watching programs, listening to and reading (from an early age) ~ stories and anecdotes of their exploits and keerti (great and awe-inspiring deeds), besides watching/observing female deities being prayed to, worshipped and revered... by a large number of people (irrespective of gender and age) ~ have made it easier (for all manner of people, especially the vast multitude... who are not quite educated or even literate) ~ to, at least, accept women in various leadership and strategic and tactical roles; to see women step out of their homes and go about their business - and not find it unusual. Else, one can only wonder about the level of obscurantism and troglodytism that these would have generated and (in turn) engulfed Sanaatan Dharma (or even what is known as Hinduism). ~ No amount of sermons or even legislation could or would have changed anything. [Also, mere education is no guarantee for a progressive outlook. Cultural conditioning is much deeper than that. ~ Changing well-entrenched perceptions, mindset, conditioning and so on is a truly herculean task.] The female avatars (i.e. the female deities) have played myriad roles: as saviours/rescuers; as protectors, preservers, strategists and warriors; as teachers (through their own behaviour/acharan, or by sharing their thoughts and vision with humanity at large); as bestowers of knowledge, wisdom, enlightenment, wealth, well-being, prosperity and happiness, and even as diplomat (the Mohini-avatar; though her story has largely been misinterpreted. Krishn, a male, is also known as "Mohan". Therefore, "Mohini" is simply the feminine of "Mohan"... and indicates a female. Mohini means: rare, uncommon. The Mohini-avatar (the 'Sudarshan Chakra' is associated with this avatar - and that itself is self-explanatory) ~ acquires the (metaphoric/allegoric) pot of 'ambrosia' from the malevolent entities ~ via diplomacy, and returns it to the positive entities; thereby enabling them to regain their position/pre-eminence. Thus, the machinations of the malevolent/negative entities came to a naught. (The positive entities of course have to perform their collective, sustained and tangible karm-yog - to regain that pre-eminence.) ~ This tale could well be an allegorical tale, applicable to all eras. | ~ BG 4.7: || yada yada hi dharmasya glanir bhavati bharata abhyutthanam adharmasya tadatmanam srjamy aham || ~ The Cosmic Entity manifests (in earthly form) to prevent a collapse of basic structure of mankind; to help and guide mankind/humanity face the challenges posed... whenever negativism become too dominant and/or when there is stagnation and a lack of a sense of direction; or when humanity is unable to find a solution to their myriad issues (i.e. when the odds/problems/challenges overtake and loom above the collective ability of humanity to find an effective solution/remedy). | However, it is unlikely that most of the female avatars would have actually worn a saree; just as it is unlikely that most of the male avatars actually wore a dhoti. This is, therefore, a result of contemporization ~ maybe, so that people, especially the vast multitude, could relate to and thus, establish a connect. Besides, there have been various reform movements, apart from numerous plays, dance-dramas, literature, verses, songs/bhajans, hymns, mantra-s, stuti-s, shloka-s, stotra-s, picture books, painting, art, iconography and so on - dedicated to the many female deities/goddesses. And, all these, have enabled people to watch/see (as well as hear/listen) and read ~ continuously (over generations). Thus, many positive things/aspects vis-à-vis women have percolated. Sanaatan Dharma and/or Hinduism is much the richer for it. Else, given our geographic size, diversity and very complex demographics, one can only wonder as to how hard it would have been and how challenging it would have been to undo epic levels of troglodytism ~ in case it were to engulf Hinduism. That it hasn't, and we have managed to remain relatively progressive, is courtesy the inspirational female avatars (and other deities). | All the avatars have an universal appeal. However, did the female deities/avatars wade through and surmount/tackle greater odds and obstacles (compared to the male deities/avatars), besides various barriers... on account of their gender, etc ~ given the 'societal churn' (the intensity of which depends on the respective era/yug), apart from stereotyping, prejudice, obscurantism and negative/regressive attitudes? Or misogyny, contempt, discrimination; maybe even envy (and all the taunt/vitriol/resentment and scorn arising out of it; perhaps some amount of objectification too?) ~ My guess is as good as yours.| This should not be construed as man's world; it is simply an indication of the progressive deterioration of society (which the avatars and other greats endeavour to correct/set right/change - there's no instant solution or quick-fix, though) ~ due to negative conditioning, mindset, prejudice and so on... all of which impact the subsequent generations, and thus weave their way into + shape the societal dynamics, which in turn define the civilizational values and culture.]

Sanskriti (culture) is a perennial knowledge stream; it can also be described as the core/nucleus/kernel of a nation. However, culture (sanskriti) is not narrow in its scope; it is not merely about language or cuisine, and the like. ~ Culture is a confluence, the collective 'way of life' - a veritable kaleidoscope. ~ The ideals of a nation/people - their adaptability to changing conditions, as well as their capacity for a broader view - i.e. an equanimous and actively open mind (in other words: their ability to learn and assimilate from other nations and peoples, 'coz a rolling stone gathers no moss) is crucial. ~ A forward-looking culture - that involves a constructive and positive way of living can (thus) provide the foundation for cultural exchange and engagement, exercising their own creativity by integrating intellectual virtues in the process. ~ "We must recognize that it is providential that the West has come to India. And yet some one must show the East to the West, and convince the West that the East has her contribution to make to the history of civilization." - said Tagore (one of the finest ambassadors of Indian/Eastern thought to the rest of the world.) ~ He was a passionate Indian, but his worldview transcends into universalism; his philosophy of humanism is enriched with the tranquil touch of internationalism ~ where one may find a unique blending of the best of the East and that of the West. Tagore was an Indian by birth but a world citizen by his perception. India in Tagore's vision is the pilgrimage (pilgrim centre) of world humanity as she is the great synthesizer and unifier in the midst of manifold differences through centuries. ... Thus, his poetry with its message of harmony, universalism and humanism is ever relevant. And harmony, balance and integrity are what Gurudev has consistently focused on... through his considerable oeuvre. ~ A widely-traveled man... Tagore was a curious and keen observer of socio-political life in the numerous countries he visited. He was a citizen of the world. ~ He believed in an intellectual union of world cultures; his vision was to take on a more holistic attitude towards understanding the dynamic spirit of his time (and beyond). ~ He felt that the West should be capable of "imparting to the East what is best in herself, and of accepting in a right spirit the wisdom that the East has stored for centuries." Tagore, though critical of the excesses and exploitation of colonial rule, did not reject western civilization per se. "... I am not for thrusting off Western civilization and becoming segregated in our independence." ~ He also distrusted "narrow domestic walls" and hollow/cynical/specious arguments ("the dreary desert sand of dead habit") ~ and recognized the importance of what India could learn - from other nations/cultures/peoples – to/for her own benefit and progress. "If Providence wants England to be the channel of that communication, of that deeper association, I am willing to accept it with all humility. I have great faith in human nature, and I think the West will find its true mission." ~ Tagore emphasized on education - intellectual pursuits and intellectual curiosity (as opposed to rote-learning) ~ 'coz knowledge is likely to be wasted if it exists in a wisdom vacuum. ... He believed that besides moral sympathy intellectual sympathy too was very much required for the understanding of nations, cultures and peoples that are different from one's own. And that, an attitude of apathy and contempt founded upon national selfishness and pride is ultimately detrimental/self-defeating; therefore, the responsibility of a great future must be "untrammelled by the grasping miserliness of a past."~ He believed that all countries of the earth must be fully conscious of the future, and that her vision must not be obscured and her faith in humanity must be strong with the strength of youth.He envisioned a parallelism - the parallelism of welding together into one body various peoples (~ and thisis reminiscent of the Universal Form of the Primordial.) ~ Tagore felt it was necessary to find out something common to all peoples/culture, which will prove their real unity (yog/sanyog/confluence), but that looking for a mere political or commercial basis of unity is not sufficient ~ discovering the spiritual unity is the way to go. He also advised that it is important for a nation/people to develop herself from within, instead of merely adopting (relying upon) Western methods; 'coz borrowing other people's history will not be enduring. ["... it does India no good to compete with Western civilization in its own field."] |Cultural homogeneity is chimeric. Ancient India has always been a kaleidoscope; there was never a homogeneous or monolithic culture (sanskriti); even languages (each language, that is) have not been homogeneous. Sanaatan Dharma itself is the best example of unity in diversity. ~ This egalitarianism, this pluralism, this all-encompassingness is once again reminiscent of the Universal Form of the Primordial; this harmony and ability to assimilate diverse thoughts, aspects, viewpoints etc has been our strength. It has been our greatest strength. And this has shaped the 'way of life'. ~ However, collective myopia (and "narrow domestic walls") - post the decline of the Gupta era - led us into the "dreary desert sand of dead habit"; it proved to be our undoing; and so, a once-glorious ancient India lost her preeminence... and rapidly crumbled into smaller and fragmented monarchies, independent kingdoms and feudatory states (that were antagonistic to each other). [~ Colonization did happen, and a whole bunch of our current ills can be blamed on it. However, throughout colonization the majority remained an overwhelming majority, and yet... myriad internal fissures and schism came about and increased manifold. So, does three fingers point right back at us? ~ My guess is as good as yours.] |Also, from our pracheen itihasa what we can gather is this: that the people of ancient civilizations not only possessed the most vaulting imaginations but also extremely advanced technology - that the modern world is as yet unaware of. ~ They had much more knowledge and sophisticated technology at their disposal than most of us moderns (given our linear view of history) - are willing to give them credit for.

~ After the decline of the Gupta era (hailed as one of the 'Golden Age' of [ancient] India - since all-round achievements in knowledge, research, medicine, literature, art, crafts, technical know-how, trade et al reached its zenith) the metaphoric kali (bud/flower of Kaliyug) began to (symbolically) wither (in the absence of a *Cakravartin/'Cakravartin system of governance/administration')... thereby gradually giving way to the ghor Kaliyug phase (euphemistically known as the 'Iron Age' of ignorance/stagnation/decay.) ~ This phase is characterized by stagnation/apathy/ennui/indifference; considerable pessimism, despondency, loss of hope, confusion, delusion, and so on hold sway; thus, perception/perspective/comprehension/cognitive abilities too get diminished/dulled, intellectual capacity dims. ~ Sat/Satya/Krita Yug is the time to move out of this metaphoric 'quicksand'/'mud'/quagmire... onto an upward trajectory. In other words: a complete renaissance: from the lowest point(the ghor Kaliyug phase, also known as the most degraded/degenerate of all ages/eras/yugs) to the best of eras/ages/yugs (Sat/Satya/Krita Yug). ... This reshaping/transformation of humanity/human society indicates a whole new era, a new age, a renewal/rejuvenation, a new dawn - wherein humanity/human society/civilization will have to find its rhythm - gradually, incrementally... but steadily - through patience and collective effort. ... This will enable/allow it to "heal"... so as to reinvigorate/revitalize itself sufficiently enough to find its mojo (~ which in turn will [gradually] lead to all-round progress and prosperity - a better human society/civilization.)

*There was a well-thought-out system of governance/administration under a Cakravartin; so (maybe) long-term thinking (culminating in organic solutions/measures - for governance challenges, etc) and prioritization... with allies/other kings/chieftains/satraps was involved... (also) resulting in some (long-term) mechanism - collective guidelines/roadmap/framework/architecture in place; the macro-picture was kept in mind. [~ 'Coz adhocism, piecemeal-ism would have resulted in a constant back-and-forth, endless changes in those guidelines/framework... culminating in stagnation, letting go of opportunities, and so forth. The history of ancient India would have been very different then.] There was no "polity-based" system, though. 'Coz ancient India (no matter by what name this land was called) was no stranger to immense diversity (as well as very complex demographics). However, a Cakravartin knew how to turn all of that into strength, and therefore, an advantage. A Cakravartin-raja was (thus) a unifier, a binding force/factor; a leader, a ruler, an administrator, a far-thinker, a teacher, a catalyst, a reformer and a well-wisher of the people; one who could take diversities (of all kinds) along. His empire was not a monolith, but rather a confederation (with maximum internal autonomy). There were kings and chieftains (janapadin) governing their own big and small regions/kingdoms/territories (janapadas and mahajanapadas), and yet, they all functioned under the all-embracing "umbrella" (and wise, far-sighted, reassuring presence) of the Cakravartin. It was not a "polity-based" system, but a symbiotic one, a synergy-creating one. ~ He was the proverbial banyan tree beneath which all others sheltered. [They did not merely defend the territories/empire from external aggression - together, but enjoyed maximum internal autonomy as well. ~ Yet again, a win-win. In a way, we can say, collectivism/democracy at its best... under the "wisdom tree" (guiding spirit - Chakravartin). There was co-dependence (including economic dependence), and therefore, co-operation and collaboration; this ensured peace; they progressed and prospered together.] ... And, as we know, ancient India was marked by all-round progress, prosperity and preeminence. | Ancient India (whose contours were not confined to modern India) had a long-lived civilization and culture. Collaboration is the key to success in any venture... and this explains the multifarious achievements of the ancient Indians. ... The economy was robust and trade flourished (both overland trade and sea-borne trade... in raw materials, manufactured goods and objects). The wisdom behind the 'Chakravartin system of governance/administration' is this: diverse nations/cultures/peoples were able to celebrate and share their ideals and aspirations... leading to harmony, wholeness and integrity. [A veritable rainbow.] As a result: they were (largely) able to rise above their petty identities, narrow self-interests, and prejudices/disputes; they were (thus) also able to identify with their commonalities (~ and in the process develop some sort of cultural affinity). ~ This balanced and holistic worldview was a prerequisite for a sustainable and resilient future. This was the big vision... integrating the multifaceted nature of their co-existence with collaboration. ~ It needed collective effort: coexistence and cooperation. Recognizing and/or accepting intricacies (composite culture/diversities, etc) required forbearance and understanding. It neededenergetic engagement with diversity - an achievement, 'coz mere diversity without real (organic) relationship would have yielded schisms/misunderstandings; the 'Chakravartin system of governance/administration' (instead) sought understanding across lines of difference, thus their ignorance of one another was minimized. They could hold their deepest differences not in isolation, but in relationship to one another: through constructive dialogue (both speaking and listening) and engagement, give and take, mutual respect, and so on... and this process (very likely) revealed both common understandings and real differences; however, given their guiding/management principles and qualitative approach/attitude/disposition, they could surge over or submerge these differences... leading to an organic confederation (of composite cultures/peoples/nations) that defended together and shared/created together. Coercion or craftiness/cunning (as opposed to diplomacy, patience, give and take, long-term vision and tactfulness) may not have achieved this level/quality of cohesion and endurance between superdiversities; instead, it may have widened and/or given rise to all manner of asymmetries and (ultimately) become a nemesis (ruinous or self-defeating). | Post the decline of the Gupta era, the importance of prioritizing - a collective roadmap/framework ['Cakravartin system of governance/administration'] and a binding and guiding factor [Cakravartin] was acutely clear to one and all... when an once-prosperous ancient India rapidly crumbled into smaller and fragmented monarchies, independent kingdoms and feudatory states. (~ Gradually... the ghor Kaliyug phase, euphemistically known as the 'Iron Age' of ignorance/stagnation/decay set in.) 

In ancient India (which may not have been confined to the contours of modern India), the 'Cakravartin system of governance/administration' pretty much held good (~ until the decline of the Gupta period, that is). Thereafter, there was lack of wisdom, sagacity, long-term vision, foresight, and so forth; collective myopia precipitated the decline of ancient India. ~ Therefore, the earlier Cakravartins (very likely) also concentrated (i.e. invested time and effort) in building a framework/architecture/roadmap - through consensus. And, perhaps, this architecture/roadmap was not tied to them (meaning, it was irrespective of any personality, etc). Maybe, it was based on a comprehensive and long-term understanding of issues, events (and the like), besides, on the future needs of the various lands/regions and peoples (that came under the all-embracing/encompassing "umbrella" of the Cakravartin). Therefore, even when there were some hiccups... the consensus-based framework/guidelines/roadmap/architecture generally held good. ~ Maybe, such a broad-based/consensus-based framework/architecture/roadmap/system was required to manage/govern diverse cultures and peoples, with relative seamlessness. Maybe, it (also) aided in a relatively smooth change of guard/transfer of power/succession/transition (in any part of the empire)... and (thus) ensured continuity and peace with minimal turbulence. Also, each emperor/ruler/king/chieftain may not have possessed the same caliber and stature as the one preceding them. So (perhaps) having a consensus-based framework/architecture/roadmap/system made sense. ~ It (probably also) helped to unify while maintaining the cultural diversities et al. ... And this (perhaps) also enabled the Cakravartin to concentrate (invest time, energy and effort) on other important aspects, such as all-round progress, trade, innovation, and so on... instead of having to firefight all the time or expend all his time and energies in dispute-resolution/crisis-management. | Sri Ram was a fine Chakravartin (~ though his empire was not confined to the contours of modern India). Sri Krishn too, despite not being a samraat (emperor) himself, was a fine Chakravartin, given his actions, wisdom, foresight and guidance/counsel.

~ Another etymology (for "Kalkiḥ") from Sanskrit is 'white horse'; meaning: Kalkiḥ is the 'white horse'; maybe: someone with equine features. ~ The 'white' horse allegory: probably signifies Puṇḍarīka, Svetakamala or Shubhra Kamal - the metaphoric "pure white lotus". Pure white indicates pristine, embodiment of pure knowledge: kundalini power. It also signifies tranquility. | ... Krishn is also known as keshavah: one who is himself the three: kahBrahma, ah Vishnu and Isa Shiva; in other words: Satyam-Shivam-Sundaram. [~ Do refer to the relevant passages on Keshavah.] | ~ Brahma, 'coz He is universal Brahmn/Universal Consciousness; He is also Prapitaamahah: The creator of Lord Brahma (father of the 'father of beings'/thus Lord Brahma is also known as Pitamah), it is He who instructs Lord Brahma. (The 10th Vishnu is the avatar for the coming age or Yug, and is synonymous with Krishna. Maybe that's why this avatar is regarded as the second coming of Krishna.) ~ The 10th Vishnu is also regarded as 'Sampoorna Avatar' (a total, complete, all-encompassing avatar; now whether it means that glimpses of all avatars can be seen in this avatar or not? ~ my guess is as good as yours.) ... As for whether this avatar will also be (e.g.) Lord Maitreya Buddha (the next Buddha-to-be after Gautama Buddha/Sakyamuni Buddha), Saoshyant of the Zoroastrians, the second coming of Christ, and so on ~ my guess is as good as yours. (~ Also, given the Shambhala connection - since both are said to be the ruler/king of the fabled Buddhist land or mythical kingdom of Shambhala - whether Kalkiḥ Maitreya and/or Maitreya Buddha will also be Shambhu Nath or not ~ my guess is as good as yours.) [... However, if at all this were to be an all-encompassing avatar, it will not only be unprecedented, but none other than Krishn can manifest such an avatar.] (Maitreya - Pāli: mettā, Sanskrit: maitrī/maitree - means: 'One whose name is kindness or friendliness'. Maitreya could also mean, 'One who brings about maitrī'. A more fluent translation of Metteya in English would be "friend" - since maitrī (Pāli: mettā) is in turn derived from the noun mitra (Pāli: mitta) which means "friend". Buddha is derived from the root "Budh", meaning both to "wake up" and "to know". Thus, Buddha = One who is Enlightened or "Awakened".) | ~ The 10th Vishnu (Vishnu-Kalki or Krishna-Kalki) is the Renaissance Man/Yug Purush who will #1. set the stage for Sat/Satya/Krita Yug ('Golden Age' - the age of rejuvenation, prosperity and progress) of the next cycle/Maha-Yug to manifest; #2. he will also provide the guidance for this inter-mahayugtransition (from the 'Iron Age'/lowest point/worst of Kaliyug to the best era/yug of all - the 'Golden Age' of Sat/Satya/Krita Yug). #3. Apreserver and stabilizing entity, he will be amongst humanity to prevent calamity/turmoil/destruction ('Pralaya' on earth); #4. to 'close' Kaliyug + the current Maha-Yug (four-yug cycle); to provide guidance and set the stage for a complete (though gradual) renaissance/renewal.| ... The Kalki-avatar (Krishna-Kalki) is not quite the "Apocalyptic Horse Rider".~ He is a guide/pathfinder as well as protector and preserver/stabilizinger: one who will arrive to prevent Pralaya (on earth). ~ However, one wonders what the confusion and concern over the Mayan calendar - supposedly predicting the 'end of the world' (on December 21, 2012) was all about? Was it misunderstood or misinterpreted? Did the Mayans actually predict apocalypse/'end of the world'? Or, did they indicate the sun changing direction? Or was it indicative of the 'closure' of a yug (as they saw it)... and the subsequent transition into another... (and therefore), an opportunity to connect to greater wisdom and light? ~ My guess is as good as yours. (Maybe, a deeper study of their literature will throw more light. ~ If only the script/glyphs of various extinct civilizations could be deciphered...) [Do read: link- for more details on Shambhala, etc.] 

Note: Umm, did the Mayan Calendar indicate the closure of a cycle of time [yug - as they saw it; but then, did the later translators misinterpret it?] ~ Was it also indicative of the Galactic Alignment (~ the transition in to a whole new Yug - a Maha-Yug as per Sanaatan Dharmic thought; ~ not to a sudden total change/transformation/self enlightenment/self realization of the human species in totality... but to a gradual, incremental, slow but steady finding of its rhythm - through patience and collective effort... for a prosperous, progressive and inclusive society? ~ In other words: The [gradual] evolution/awakening/upgrade of human consciousness. The gradual awakening of the Chakras and kundalini, leading to the awakening of the Sahasrara - the 7th chakra, the crown chakra (the highest chakra). 

[Note: Here is Tagore's Aloker ei jharna dharaye dhuiye dao:link. | Satyajit Ray's documentary on Tagore (~ the Biswa-kabi/Universal Bard is the first-ever Asian to be awarded with the Nobel Prize): link.]

.............................................................................. 

Nishkamakarma (selfless/non-glory-seeking karma) is the dynamic power of duty (i.e. dharma/right action - for the greater good - a better/progressive society/civilization) exalted by (the dharmic freedom of) inner detachment. ~ It is freedom inaction, not freedom from action. As such, it is an expression of deepest dharma (dharmic consciousness). It is a Cause far greater than the individual selves. It is one of Life. It is one of Right (dharma/ right action - for the greater good) and Truth - of our fundamental being. It is through disciplined karm that the individual comes to realize his or her true nature as well as his or her true purpose. [~ In other words: only by performing good deeds indefinitely/continuously, sakama (selfish, glory-seeking) karm gets transformed into nishkam (selfless/non-glory-seeking) karm.] ... It is then that one transcends the dualism of hope and despondency, gain and loss, joy and sorrow, hate and personal desire. It is then that one becomes a Siddha - a pure/perfect being - one's heart becomes larger than the universe itself (i.e. Sat-cit-ānanda or the eternal bliss/spiritual ecstasy of self-realization.) ~ Wisdom is firmly set. Material desire (for praise, glory or thoughts of achieving 'eternal life' or moksha etc) is replaced by the desire of the soul and the realization of this inner self (self-realization) - one's true being - as part of a greater Whole, which is the proper goal of all one's striving. Those who are endowed with the knowledge of selfless (non-glory-seeking) action renouncing all motives of personal glory etc - perform their actions (duty/karm) without attachment to their consequences (fruits). They are not carried away by success or depressed by lack of quick results, but enjoy mental equanimity. Nothing can affect their resolve. Thus, they have achieved sovereign control of the mind and through it that inner freedom(dharmic freedom of inner detachment), which provides for unity (yog/sanyog) of thought, word and deed - which is the hallmark of Aryan consciousness ('Arya Dharma'). | The advantage that flows from the performance of selfless action may be summarized quite briefly. The imperative of dharma as detached (inner detachment, freedom from attachment) duty now reveals its own intrinsic values of dignity, purity and sublimity. It must be emphasized that selfless (non-glory-seeking) action does not suggest unconcern for a given goal or purpose. Indeed, implicit in the very concept is the idea of a cause, or purpose, beyond the interests of the individual (a cause much higher than oneself - for the greater good/Loka Kalyana or Loka-sangraha), which provides the necessary field for action. And there can be no higher cause than Loka-kalyana or Loka-sangraha (the greater good - to build a better society and civilization).

~ To work for a greater cause (e.g. for a better/progressive, prosperous and inclusive society and civilization), but to work in detachment (i.e. with inner detachment - with the dharmic freedom it bestows - symbolized by the lotus in muddy water and the hamsah/swan in water; not to be inferred as robotic or machine-like but that impediments should not deject or demoralize). [The roots of a lotus are in the mud (muddy water), the stem grows up through the water, and the heavily scented flower lies pristine above the water. ~ The lotus remains Nirmal - pristine, even though rooted in the muddiest waters. ~ While the swan's feathers do not get damp despite remaining in contact with water. ~ It is the mark of an enlightened, higher soul (mahatmanah). The spirit of such persons is spotless. Therefore, the concept of caraṇa-ambujam/caraṇa-ambhojam or "lotus feet" and kara-puṣkara or "lotus-palm" has come about. ~ The lotus flower and the swan/hamsah are (thus) embodiments of inner detachment (~ the dharmic freedom it bestows) and exemplify a true yogi - a real ascetic (hamsan) or sanyaasi (inner detachment/jeevan mukt - it does not indicate renunciation). ~ Such a one is a nishkam karm-yogi.] | To not feel upset if unsuccessful (i.e. if instant results are not achieved); to not feel pride if successful. To be indifferent/stoic to disparagement. To not feel exalted by praise. Instead, to feel indifferent. To cultivate equanimity and equipoise. That is intrinsic to karm yog. ~ Struggle (continuous effort) does not necessarily guarantee (instant) success; but without it, no positive change is possible. And the call to struggle is called - duty. The higher cause (for Loka Kalyana or Loka-sangraha - the greater good) and the struggle (continuous effort) alone should inspire the thoughts and actions. The struggle, however, is one of protraction -extending over decades and generations. [It also involves course correction, including resetting/redirection of humanity/society's inner compass.] It cannot be sustained by ephemeral passions or the whims of the moment, but only by focused and unrelenting resolve which is unaffected by the vagaries of success and setback. Therefore, it is important to cultivate the yoga of struggle (that of equanimity and equipoise). ~ BG 2.15:  || yam hi na vyathayanty ete purusam purusarsabha sama-duhkha-sukham dhiram so 'mrtatvaya kalpate || ~ "O noble one [Arjun], that person of wise judgment equipoise in happiness and distress, and is steady in both, is certainly eligible for 'eternal life' (immortality/mrityunjay - due to their karm)."| ~ Through the practice of selfless action, one achieves equanimity and efficiency. It is this efficiency of all those working in concert for the common cause which is the prerequisite for positive societal change. By choosing to become instruments of this higher cause (i.e. for Loka-kalyana or Loka-sangraha - the greater good) and struggle (continuous effort) ~ one becomes part of a higher destiny. Therefore, (Krishn's advise is): do your duty. Let your life become one with the Cause of the greater whole. That, and that alone. [~ That is nishkam (selfless/non-glory-seeking) karm and karm yog.] ~ If everyone concerned were to embrace the higher cause (leading to the greater good - a better society/world/civilization) and act upon it with dedication and consistency, the struggle (continuous effort) could certainly be mastered, no matter the odds. It requires staying-power (dharmic stamina and steadfastness). One cannot grow weary and give up, without committing themselves unreservedly to the struggle (i.e. to continuous effort for the higher cause - leading to the greater good: Loka-kalyana or Loka-sangraha). Instead of being active participants in their own destiny, humanity cannot become idlers and spectators. The higher Cause is impossible and hopeless for the weak-minded (in his or her own subjective judgment); it is not objectively hopeless or impossible for those worthy of it. For the former, this unimpressive attitude is the (result of) expectation of quick, easy, effortless results. If a certain outcome is not realized within a set period of time, they tend to despair, and (therefore) give up... and the whole enterprise is (thus) abandoned. ~ Ironically, it is this very focus on fixed (quick/instant, tangible) results, rather than on fulfillment of duty (steadfast karm/effort with inner detachment – for the greater good), which obscures the vision and blinds one to those possibilities which might otherwise open up as a by-product of correct thinking and acting, and thus lead to that very change they all seek. Amidst all the talk of the need for positive change, this fixation on (instant) outcome quickly leads to frustration and despair when success is not easily and readily achieved. But this attitude - this mental posture - is wrong and self-defeating. It is therefore prudent to shun such an attitude/outlook, and detach oneself. [i.e. to cultivate equanimity and equipoise - for inner detachment and the dharmic freedom it bestows. ~ This would give freedom inaction, not freedom from action.] ~ The ancient Aryans (noble-minded or noble-natured people) called it nishkâmakarma- action without attachment (to karmphal/outcome), action without personal desire (for quick/instant results or for personal glory). It is selfless endeavor, efficient (and continuous) action without fear or doubt, and may be defined as the performance of one's duty without desire for the fruits of one's action(s). [~ Here there is no regard for personal glory of any kind. One might say that it is simply a matter of doing the dharmic thing (for a better society/civilization - the greater/collective good) - not for the results or outcome, not out of desire for personal glory or praise. Nothing more, nothing less.] ... Put another way, selfless action (nishkam karm) is disciplined action directed toward a goal greater than one's own personal whims and interests; a higher cause - for the greater good (Loka Kalyana or Loka-sangraha). It is about becoming part of a higher destiny. The person of action (karm yogi - one who walks the talk) does not withdraw and turn inward, but cheerfully embraces struggle and toil as the ideal in life. [And so, Shri Ram is known as 'Adarsh/Ideal Purush'; he accepted continuous struggle and toil as being intrinsic to bringing about positive societal change; change in firmly held/ingrained mindset, viewpoints, conditioning, perceptions and so on.] For a karm yogi, selflessness consists of the renunciation of personal desire (a carefree life, personal glory, praise, etc), not of action itself. Restraint and discipline of the senses (i.e. inner detachment [Jeevan Mukt] and the dharmic freedom it bestows) must, accordingly, not be seen as selfish ends in themselves, enabling one to escape from the rigours of life. Rather - along with action (steadfast karm-yog) itself - they are to be considered a means by which one is able to discharge one's duty in the service of a higher cause (Loka-kalyana or Loka-sangraha - the greater/collective good, e.g. a progressive, prosperous and inclusive society). ~ Such a one  is a karm-yogi - hamsan; such a yogi is called hamsah - the swan. (~ Do also read the relevant passages on hamsah - the swan.)

.......................................................................... 

What does the joining of the palms indicate? 

The gesture used when bowing in Namaste is the bringing of both hands together, palms touching, in front of the person - usually at the chest, or a higher level such as below the chin, below the nose, or above the head.

~ This gesture is a mudra, a well-recognized symbolic hand position in the ancient Vedic faith (Sanaatan Dharma). One hand represents the higher, spiritual nature, while the other represents the worldly self. By combining the two, the person making the gesture is attempting to rise above his or her differences with others, to connect him or herself to the person they bow to. The bow is a symbolic bow of love and respect. [Sanaatan = timeless, eternal. Dharma = path or 'way of life'.] 

Particularly in the Sanaatan Dharma, when one worships or bows in reverence, the symbolism of the two palms touching is of great significance. It is the joining together of two extremities - the feet of the Divine, with the head of the devotee. The right palm denotes the feet of the Divine and the left palm denotes the head of the devotee. The Divine feet constitute the ultimate solace for all sorrows. ~ This is a time-honoured thought that runs through the entire ethos - of this timeless Vedic faith.

Train To Delhi

$
0
0


A Note on the author:Shiv K. Kumar (born August 16, 1921) is a distinguished poet, novelist, short story writer, playwright, translator, academic and critic. He has published thirteen volumes of poetry, five novels, two collections of short stories, a play and a dozen books on literary criticism. Following stints as a lecturer and as programme officer at the All India Radio, he obtained his doctorate in English Literature from the University of Cambridge (~ here he was also tutored by the influential British critic F.R. Leavis). Kumar has been an academic, teaching British and American literature in India and abroad, for about four decades. In 1978, he was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature (FRSL), London. ~ Several of his poems and short stories have been broadcast over the BBC, and published in various widely-read journals, newspapers and magazines - like the New York Times, Poetry Review (London), Western Humanities Review, among others. He received the Sahitya Akademi Award in 1987. In 2001, he was awarded the Padma Bhushan for his contribution to literature.

Train To Delhi is portrayed as a "rollicking journey set in Delhi of 1947". [The novel was first published in 1998 as A River with Three Banks.] 

Itrecounts the tale of Gautam Mehta, a journalist in Delhi (assistant editor of The Challenge) - and the novel's quick-witted protagonist, alongside enameled snuffboxes, and hobson-jobson conversations ~ as India made its tryst with destiny.

Mehta arranges a quick divorce from his adulterous wife ~ by convincing a naïve Bishop and converting to Christianity. [However, during the simple ceremony, and before Father Jones sprinkles holy water on his head and shoulders, Gautam is particularly touched by a passage from Joshua in which Moses asks his followers to cross the river Jordan into the land of new promise. "Wasn't he too about to cross over to freedom!" He is also struck by the dignified manner in which the ceremony was conducted - including the bishop's prayer wishing him happiness - nobody was "mumbling incomprehensibly all the time."] ~ The Delhi of 1947 is chaotic and restless; despite the proficient Commissioner Thornton at the helm, there is considerable lawlessness. Gautam finds a dead man, and learns that the deceased was in search of his abducted daughter Haseena who had been kidnapped in Allahabad, and sold into flesh trade (in Delhi). This disturbs him, especially since he finds a striking resemblance between the deceased, Abdul Rahim, and his own father, Shamlal Mehta, ("the same arched eyebrows, the same chiseled chin and nose.") ~ Later, after sharing a bottle of champagne and some pakoras, followed by a supper of seekh kebab, raita, nan and some fried chicken at the Neel Kamal, his best friend Berry (Birendra Dhawan) suggests availing the services of a lady of the night to celebrate Gautam's divorce. Sensing his hesitancy, Berry playfully teases him as 'Knight-saviour' and 'Gautam Buddha'. ~ Somewhat reluctantly, Gautam negotiates with the pimp... and ends up (at the Bridge Hotel, run in close partnership with Neel Kamal) with a hauntingly beautiful Muslim woman of quiet dignity - Haseena. ~ Gallant Gautam introduces himself and informs her about the deceased man. Thereupon, they embark on an elaborate plan - to help the damsel in distress escape the clutches of the pimp (which the protagonist-hero compares to a concentration camp). With the help of Berry - who by now has adopted Haseena as his sister-in-law - they manage to get away from the villain/pimp (who is in hot pursuit) and are soon on the train to Allahabad to see her family. The rest of the story involves Gautam explaining the situation to his family, meeting Haseena's family (and asking their permission for marriage ~ in the process becoming Saleem Gautam); his one-on-one with the villain/pimp; their attempts to steer clear of the discord and antagonism; Gautam attending Gandhiji's meetings and prayers (concluded with a rhythmical hand-clapping and head-swaying to the Ramdhun); Berry's dalliances; snippets of the twilight of the Raj, and so on. Gautam - with the help of Berry's British connections - also arranges for (expedites the process, that is) the immigration papers... of Haseena's family (her mother - Begum Rahim and younger sister - Salma), and then escorts them safely to Wagah. Haseena, of course, stays back. (However, given the disquiet, they all travel up to Wagah under assumed names: Begum Rahim as mataji and Salma as Durga, while Haseena and Gautam sees them off as Seema and Gautam respectively.) ~ All in all, the novel ends on a strong note of spiritual universalism, optimism and humanism ~ that of a people having a definite past, their present somewhat disturbed by partition (of the sub-continent)... but that the future is possible.

Among the secondary cast of characters, Shamlal Mehta (Gautam's father) is relatively well delineated. ~ After his divorce Gautam moves in with his parents, into their small house at Anand Parvat. His father, a former Arya Samaji, initially assumes a somber expression on learning about Gautam's conversion - for the sake of easy divorce. But finally responds (as an indulgent father) with: "Maybe Christ too was a yogi, a real karma yogi," and then proceeds to argue his point. When Gautam counters, "But Christ died on the cross, nailed and bleeding till the end. Stone-dead he was when they pulled him down." Shamlal responds with, "No, my dear, Christ didn't die on the cross," ..."He was left there unconscious by the Romans as 'stone-dead' and buried later. But now I earnestly believe that being a yogi, he had controlled his organs, had sort of anesthetized himself before they nailed him on the cross. And since he went into a deep Samadhi, a yogic trance, he felt no pain - nor did he really die, so, he rose from his grave after a brief spell of what I think was a kind of subterranean meditation. That was the Resurrection!" ~ Shamlal later tells the Bishop (with a straight face) ~ that he has now come to believe in Christ as another manifestation (avatar) of Vishnu.

~ There's the bit about insipid British food - steam-boiled Brussels sprouts, mashed potatoes, and scrambled eggs. An Englishman's perennial obsession with weather too is woven in quite neatly.

'Lovely weather - isn't it? Not too oppressive.'
'Yes, it isn't too sultry.'
'We really don't mind the Indian weather at all,' the major said, ... 'We'd prefer it to the vile British winter - blizzard, mist and smog.'
'Yes, I guess.'
A brief pause.
'It's a great pity we have to leave India,' Foster resumed, rather wistfully...'

'Any other Indians coming?' Berry asked.
'No. Only my compatriots. All packed up to return home - to London, Liverpool, Glasgow...'
'So it's a sort of farewell party.'
'Yes, the play's done.'
'You know, Bob, they did a marvelous job here. I do feel sorry for them. I'm sure they're going to miss this bloody, hot country.'
'Miss?' said Bob, '...they're already feeling very low. A poor life awaits them out there. Meagre pensions, no servants, freezing winters - and the fog, the deadly, yellow fog.'
'Sounds ghastly,' said Berry. 'Then it was better here in spite of the heat and dust.'
'Any time. One can always beat down the heat with ceiling fans, khus-khus, and a little dust doesn't do you much harm,' Bob said, spraying himself with some perfume.'

My twopenceworth: Written with the Partition (which was a rather complex phenomenon) as the temporal setting, the author does try to portray a realistic picture of Allahabad and Delhi of that era. He has also attempted to weave the various aspects of partition (cultural, historical, spiritual, emotional, economic, and so on)... apart from the political/geographic division of the country into the texture of the novel. The Gautam-Haseena track provides a strong romantic tinge/motif through the story - though the eponymous train journey probably is an allegorical one, since in the book it takes up all of ten pages. The novel is more of a novella... and quite crisp; editing is decent, the language is simple and easy to understand, and so the story rolls along quite well, but the narrative sometimes meanders on. Gautam's character is reasonably well-etched, however, there is scope for improvement; the other central character, Haseena, comes across as uni-dimensional - so, plenty of space for improvement here as well; the secondary characters too could have done with some more exploration, fleshing-out and insight ~ to move the story along more succulently and cohesively. Maybe a better mix of drama, history and romance coupled with a sustained flow of satire and comic relief could have turned a great story into a great read.


Details of the book: Train To Delhi/ Author: Shiv K. Kumar/ Publisher: Vintage Classics, an imprint of Random House India/ Binding: Paperback/ Language: English/ Publishing Date: 1998, 2013/ Genre: Fiction/ ISBN-10: 978-81-8400-396-3/ ISBN-13: 9788184003963/ Pages: Approx 250/ Price: INR 299.

Picture:The book jacket cover of Train To Delhi. Courtesy: randomhouse.

Been There Bungled That by Paddy Rangappa

$
0
0


Been There Bungled Thatis a fictionalized autobiographical story stretched across almost 300 pages. They endeavour to put together snippets and anecdotes from the protagonist Jagannath Srinivasan's life. With a first-person narrative, it is a collection of unconnectedshort pieces more reminiscent of a blog or column than a book/novel.

Jagannath Srinivasan, fondly referred to as Jags (not Jughead), drifts through life in benign autopilot... armed with the impressive combo of IIT-IIM degrees.

Like millions of Indians he studied engineering - not out of interest, but because he took the entrance examination and secured admission. Rote learning played the all-important role. Soon the natural progression to Amul country follows - to fortify him with degree #2 (~ while also applying for an MS degree in the US - just in case). Thereupon, he embarks on a rudderless career journey... with carefully worded versions of resume - each expressing his boundless passion for banking, consulting, marketing and advertising. He finally settles for whichever offer comes his way ~ based on herd mentality or peer perception, i.e. whichever is more coveted by others. For example, banks and consulting firms come to campus on day 1, which means they are ranked higher. Even the best marketing jobs are all on day 2.

Highly confused and upwardly mobile, he is easily swayed by things he reads, people he meets, and advice he actively seeks and receives. Except sane ones of course, such as the ones offered by (his father's friend) Dr Sidelinger Wakefield (a professor at Brown University) and later from his wife, Vidya. Both counsel reflection - to discover and identify what he wishes to do. ~ These sorts of advice he instantly disregards - since their source(s) are ignorant of the managerial decision making process - that requires one to start at ground zero, which is data collection. This insight helps Jags to make discerning (in Jags' view) shifts from engineering to consultancy to advertising to marketing to banking - by trimming one to three years on the typical career curve.

Here is a snippet - Jags' discussion with Dr. Wakefield:

'You're studying engineering now, right?' I nodded. 'Why?'
'Thats easy,' I said. 'I passed the JEE - the Joint Entrance Exam. ... I did badly in the medical college entrance test.'
'What?! You actually wanted to be a doctor?'
'Of course not,' I said. 'Why do you ask?'
'Because you took the medical college entrance test. You just told me!' The professor was getting agitated and his voice was rising.
'Yes, I did,' I replied soothingly. 'But that was only as a back-up. I was not serious.'
The professor shook his head in bewilderment. 'Ok, so you really wanted to do engineering but just for fun, took the medical college test too. I understand - or at least I think I do...'

Dr. Wakefield is even more puzzled to know that Jags chose his area of specialization based on its relative popularity and the popularity of the institute.

'Yes, but it's not just the relative popularity of the specialization and the institute separately. It's the combinationthat's important. ... It's very complicated,' I said smugly. ('And therefore beyond your comprehension,' I added, but only to myself.)
'I'm not going to try to follow that,' said Wakefield. ('Exactly,' I said, again to myself.)

There's the bit about a strict professor (Prof. Thampi) and his charming daughter (Vidya) whom he eventually marries - whiff of '3 Idiots'.

My twopenceworth:The chapter titles including the chance meeting with Vidya while trying to submit a late assignment: 'Submitting the POM report... and meeting someone' - reveals too much, and dilutes the charm of the following pages. It somewhat interferes with (read: diminishes) the readers' interest.

Inside jokes about copywriters, bankers, consultants, brand managers etc pepper the book. There are anecdotes regarding Jags' travails on foreign shores. However, none of them can be called fresh or original. In humour writing, especially one with large dollops of perceptive satire, novelty makes all the difference. It is also advisable to eschew unnecessary meanderings... that alters the flavour and wearies the readers' mind. Reading becomes a chore then. With humour or satire that is a no no.

Using lots of very short chapters creates an impression in the reader of very rapid pace and lots of movement. For some genres (such as thrillers), this accelerated pace is exactly the effect that a reader wants. The same may or may not be applicable to other genres, such as humour or satire. Here the quality of writing makes all the difference. Having longer chapters doesn't quite preclude fast-paced movement, but it does allow for more breathing space and a sense of scope and continuity.

Been There Bungled That has been compared to Wodehouse... and this piqued my expectations. But after plodding through the frequent and needless winding of nearly 300 pages, the content leaves me quite wooden. It neither makes nor leaves an impact. Besides, it is Jags narrating the story, talking about himself, or explaining his points of view. The rest of the characters appear quite abrupt.

However, the book is genuinely funny in bits and parts; for instance, when Jags' mother wants to have a serious discussion, he coveys it with "So I did the South Indian equivalent of laying down my fork and spoon: I stopped mashing rice with my fingers and gave her my full attention."

The jacket cover is attractive. The author is observant and a decent raconteur, apart from having a good hand at humour and insightful satire (including a dash of gentle snarkiness). What's missing is some sharp editing to curb the debutant author's prodigal instincts.


Details of the book: Been There Bungled That/ Author: Paddy Rangappa/ Publisher: Ebury Press, an imprint of Random House India/ Binding: Paperback/ Language: English/ Publishing Date: Nov. 2013/ Genre: Humour/ ISBN-10: 978-8-184-00433-5/ ISBN-13: 9788184004335/ Pages: 300/ Price: INR 250.

Picture:The book jacket cover of Been There Bungled That. Courtesy: randomhouse.

Holi, etc.

$
0
0

'Vasant' comes from the word 'spring' as this festival (Vasant/Basant Panchami, also: Shree Panchami or Sarasvati Puja) heralds the beginning of the spring season. New leaves and blossoms appear in the trees... with the promise of new life (rejuvenation) and hope. ['Naba Anande Jaago': link.] ~ Vasant Panchami also announces the arrival of another big springtime event - Holi, the festival of colours.

'Holi' comes from the word 'hola', meaning to offer oblation or prayer to the Almighty as Thanksgiving for good harvest.

~ Holi, amongst the most distinct festivals of India, evokes the buoyant spirit of the spring season. Well known for its exuberant and colourful celebrations, Holi in India stirs up excitement among people. Falling in the month of March/April, Holi celebrates the spring season and renewal. ... Coming forth with the full flush of life, the invigorating air of Holi festivities spreads into the lives of people. ~ Celebrated with energy and revelry, the fervour of Holi pervades everyone - the young and the young-at-heart alike. The essence of Holi festival is acknowledging and celebration of the spirit of oneness (cohesion), of unadulterated joy ~ to reset and renew... shunning/submerging all negativism, conflict and ill-will. ~ Holi has a special musical flavour. Traditional dishes include malpoa,kheer sandesh, basanti sandesh, chaler payesh (rice pudding) etc. |Holi 2014: March 17/18.

Here are a few Tagorean compositions celebrating Basanta Utsab (spring festival). ~ The beauty and depth of Rabindra-sangeet (Tagore's magnificent music) is beyond description:

'Ananter Baani Tumi': link.

'Phagun Haowaay Haowaay': link.

'Phaguner Nabin Anande': link.

'Ore Bhai Phagun Legechhe' (composed with Raag Basant): link.

'Basante Phool Ganthlo': link.

'Aaji Basanta Jagrata Dvarey': link.

'Ore Grihabashi Khol Dvar Khol': link.

'Neel Digante Oi Phuler Agun Laglo': link.

'Aji Jhara Jhara Mukharo Badoro Diney': link.

'Mor Bhabonare Ki Haowaay Matalo': link

... and the delectable 'Aji Dakhino Duar Khola': link.

~ As we know, Shamsundar Krishn is the personification of the king of seasons - Rituraj Basant.

BG 10.35: || ṛtūnāḿ kusumākaraḥ || ~ "and of seasons I am spring."

~ Heralding the onset of spring, Basant Panchami celebrates nature as beautiful flowers and greenery starts to blossom in all its glory. |Vasant Panchami is celebrated on the first day of spring, the fifth day (Panchami) of Shukla Paksha (the fortnight of the waxing moon) of Magh Masa (month) - January-February. ... Vasanta Panchami, which marks the end of winter and heralds in spring, is dedicated to Goddess Sarasvati - the goddess of speech and learning, who blesses the world with vach (words) and the wealth of knowledge. This day is also commemorated by praying to Lord Krishna. | ~ It is the festival/celebration of the king of all seasons: Spring/Basant. ~ It commences from spring season and carries up to Panchami of Krishna Paksha of Falgun month, i.e. it begins with Makarasankranti and ends with Mahashivratri. [Holi is celebrated at the approach of vernal equinox, on the Phalgun Purnima (Full Moon) ~ on the last full moon day of the lunar month, Phalgun.]

Vasant or Basant is especially considered significant for lovers of art and education (wisdom and intellectual pursuits, not merely text-bookish knowledge or classroom schooling).

The day of Vasant/Basant Panchami is considered to be the beginning of new life. Spring season is the season of rebirth and bloom. Fields of yellow mustard charm the heart. Wheat crop starts swaying like gold. Colourful flowers start blossoming. ... The day of Basanta Utsab is (thus) celebrated as the welcoming of colours and happiness.

'Aanandadhaara Bohichhe Bhubane': link.

'Aami Ki Gaan Gaabo Je': link.

Here is: 'Esho Shyamala Sundara': link.

... Coming before us as personified spring is Shyamsundar Krishn ~ full of colour, joy, and ecstasy and dressed as a daring dramatic dancer. Krishn means "all-attractive" (shyAmaH or kRiShNa means black - kaalah [all-absorbing/Ghanshyam.] Black does not reflect light. In the case of black, all the colours making up white light are absorbed which makes that object appear black). | Krishn is "all-attractive" - at his charming and captivating best - with a magical power to hold us spellbound. He looks like the full moon surrounded by its entourage of stars. His effulgent white turban appears especially splendid sitting obliquely on his head. It is decorated with bunches of flowers, sprinkled with fragrant reddish powder (pollen or "gulaal", or maybe even the flaming-red Gulmohar, also known as "Krishnachura" or 'crown of Krishna'), and surrounded by butterflies shaking his peacock feathered-crest. His curly dark blue hair is tied back, and he wears glittering yellow garments (Peetabasa; pitaH or HaridrabhaH = yellow in Sanskrit) just suitable for the spring season. A sachet of camphor is tucked in his gem-studded belt. ... While listening to the vasanta raga (i.e. the melody and the ecstasy of spring), Krishn holds a flute in his left hand and a ball of red powder (gulaal) in his right hand. Overjoyed at the sight of Krishna, the forest creepers display ecstatic dance. The gentle breezes from the Malayan Hills appear as a guru to teach them how to dance. The beautiful mango groves with their blossoming flowers ap­pear like exuberant laughter... and illuminate the grove with pleasant effulgence. Bumblebees, cuckoos, and other exotic birds hum and warble pleasingly. The creepers dance along according to the instructions of the wind. The spring season arrives in the form of a playful lion cub showing his teeth as the stamens of the flowers. The south­ern breezes force the chills of winter to depart. It appears as if the nostrils of personified time has now opened and started breathing in and out. ['Aanandadhvani Jaagao Gagane': link.]~ The juncture of winter and spring seem like the period between child­hood and adolescence. Creepers explode with new buds. There are abundant colours all around. The cuckoos sing a sweet melody. ... It seems as if the buds, birds, and breezes all awaited the depar­ture of the winter season. With the disappearance of winter, the forests and trees beam with delight... and welcome the spring season with plentiful colours and the sweet fragrances of fresh flowers. The camarideer prepared the stage by clearing the forest floor with their bushy tails. Wandering kasturi deer scented the air with the heady fra­grance of musk. ~ The creepers appear to be smeared with rich aromas. Even humans lose their lethargy and feel a new energy flowing through them. Delighted, they submerge in an ocean of joy and gaiety. There is gulaal, flying of colourful (and even innovatively designed) kites, sumptuous feast and unlimited happiness during the Holi festival. A new zeal of life can be seen coming in all around. Colourful flowers decorate the earth. Swarms of butterflies dance in mid-air and waltz among the flowering creepers.

~ Krishn (personified spring) - the epitome of cool, the ocean of elegance, appears like a dramatic artist dressed in colourful garments.

Hopeful, festive, fresh flavour, evergreen, vibrant - a raag that is suitable for singing in the evenings, a raag that ushers in the festive spirit and one that dispels pessimism and instills hope - it's the raag Vasant. |"Vasant" means springtime, and this raag has been suitably named since all that is associated with it is hope and positivity. Vasant is a lively raagand the happiness it exudes is endearing and irresistible.

Shyamsundar, whose joy­ous nature spreads in all directions, fills the horizon with the reflection of his enchanting *blue complexion. ~ Whose mind participating in this flourishing festi­val of spring will not elate?

... All this is of course allegorical. The spring season is described ~ with Krishn as personified spring.

~ The dance is the Divine Dance - the fascinating picturesque dance of colours - between Purusha (Cosmic Energy or Primal Creative Energy - unmanifested Purusha + its embodiment or manifestation) and Prakriti(Manifested Nature). ~ Between the Creator and Created. Between the Infinite and finite. Between the Eternal and the evanescent.

Krishn is Hari (haritaH or PalashaH means green in Sanskrit) ~ and so, is also depicted as wrapped in cool cyan - bluish green). neelaH = blue. ~ He is Kshiteeshah: The Partner (allegorically speaking) of the earth/nature.

HA= sky
RA= fire
I= energy
HARI = effulgent omnipresent omnipotent omniconscient cosmic energy.

Rudra Gayatri Mantra: || yo rudro agnau yo apsu ya oṣadhīṣu yo rudro viśvā bhuvanā viveśa tasmai rudrāya namo astu || ~ "To the Rudra who is fire, who is in water, who is in trees and plants, who has entered into the entire Universe, to that Rudra let our salutations go."| Rudra-Siva's depiction is allegorical (referlink1) but the face is feminine. 

[The Milky Way galaxy itself was seen as the path of Aryaman (the noble one) or the Ganges (the name etymologically related to going) of the sky (akash-ganga). ~ Here is 'Taba Charana Nimney': link. | Tagore's 'Suneel Saagorer Shyamal Kinaarey': link. | ~ Songs by Rajanikanta Sen is known as "Rajanikanter Gaan". Tagore's compositions are called "Rabindrasangeet" - Tagore's magnificent music.]

'Ayi Bhuban Mano Mohini': link. [~ This song is Tagore's celebration of nature during springtime. The sublime verses also celebrate Goddess Sarasvati and Goddess Parvati as Rudra-Siva. ~ This song should also help us understand just who the Mohini-avatar is. |Mohini = rare, uncommon. ~ The Krishn-avatar, a male, is also known as "Mohan". Therefore, "Mohini" is simply the feminine of "Mohan"... and is indicative of a female. The 'Sudarshan Chakra' - the combination of Ajna chakra (the 6th chakra) and Sahasrara (the 7th chakra or crown chakra - the highest chakra) is associated with this avatar. 'Heye Khaniker Atithi': link. ('Ogo akoruun (wily one), ki maya (guile/brilliant manoeuvres) jano, milanchhaley biraha aano'.) ~ The Mohini-avatar acquired the (metaphoric/allegoric) pot of 'ambrosia' from the malevolent entities ~ via diplomacy and ample use of guile, then returned it to the positive forces, thereby enabling the latter to regain their mojo or pre-eminence. Thus, the machinations of the malevolent or negative entities came to a naught. (~ The positive entities of course had to perform their collaborative, sustained and tangible karm-yog - to regain that pre-eminence.) ... This tale too can well be an allegorical tale, applicable to all eras/yugs.]| The Indus seal depicting a Tiger Lady or Tiger Goddess is (very likely) the depiction of Rudra-Siva. The glyphs also show a trishul. ~ The tiger probably indicates Rudra-Siva's valiant nature. [shoorah-veerah(the valiant); vikramee (the most daring).] ~ Trishul could be a reference to a group of three Himalayan mountain peaks. Or it could be an allegory for the three rivers: Ganga, Yamuna and the mythic Sarasvati. Or both. [The confluence of the Ganga, Yamuna and the Sarasvati is known as Triveni Sangam or Prayag. Triveni and Trishul; tri = three. | Some poets assert that while sangam is a popular word for a confluence of rivers, this particular confluence was called Sangayam, to represent the meeting of Sarasvati (sa), Ganga (ga) and Yamuna (yam). Sangayam could mean, to flow together.] | ~ Rivers and cows are often poetically correlated in the Rig Veda. (~ Cows emerging out of mountains - is a reference to various rivers; in the Arya or noble 'way of life' rivers and water-bodies were not polluted). | This should also help us understand what 'cows' are associated with Krishn. | Gopa = ruler, king or monarch. ~ BG 10.27: || narāṇāḿ ca narādhipam || ~ "and among humans I am the monarch" (Cakravartin - a sagacious and sensible consensus-builder, someone with a broader outlook/vision, an able leader and administrator + guardian [protector/preserver and guide].)

BG 10.24: || sarasam asmi sagarah || ~ "and of bodies of water I am the ocean."| ~ It is a reference to the mighty River Indus, perhaps the largest of all rivers in the world after the Nile - Sanskrit: Nilah or Neel. | Sarasam also indicates saras - meaning: gracefully flowing. Saras or Sarasa means spring, pool or fountain. Saras or Sarasa can also indicate SarasvatI. ~ The Sarasvati River is an important river goddess in the Rig Veda. The Sanskrit name means, "having many pools". The Sanskrit name for the River Indus is Sindhu. "Sindhu" means river, stream or ocean in Sanskrit.]  

~ The Sindhu and SarasvatI are mentioned repeatedly, respectfully and glowingly in the Rig Veda. The region between the Sindhu and Sarasvati rivers were regarded by the Rig Vedic people as the holiest of holy grounds - Brahmadesa. The two rivers nourished tall majestic trees, plants and flowers. The SarasvatI River is an important river goddess in the Rig Ved ~ whose banks served as fertile soil for the growth of ancient Vedic culture. ~ The spectacular scenery and the might of Indus had inspired the composition of hymns on Sindhu (Sanskrit name for the River Indus). Thousands of years ago the might of the Sindhu and Sarasvati had given birth to the oldest and largest civilization of the ancient world - the Arya Civilization (also known as the Indus-Sarasvati Civilization or 'Aryavarsha'). |"The Rivers have come forward triply, seven and seven. Sindhu in might surpasses all the streams that flow." Its power is praised as mighty and unrestrained, of independent glory, roaring as it runs. Other rivers roar into the Sindhu. [BG 10.24: || sarasam asmi sagarah || ~ "and of bodies of water I am the ocean."| Sindhu" means river, stream or ocean in Sanskrit.] As a warrior-king leads other warriors, so does Sindhu lead other rivers. The Indus, considered sacred, is further described as the lord and leader of the moving floods, active as a dappled mare, mighty as a bellowing bull, kind as a mother to her calves, rich in gold, rich in ample wealth ~ for whom Varuṇa, the water god, cut the channels for its forward course. ~ "His roar is lifted up to heaven above the earth: he puts forth endless vigour with a flash of light. Like floods of rain that fall in thunder from the cloud, so Sindhu rushes on bellowing like a bull. ... Sindhu, unto thee the roaring rivers run. Thou leadest as a warrior king thine army's wings what time thou comest in the van of these swift streams. Most active of the active, Sindhu unrestrained, like to a dappled mare, beautiful, fair to see. Rich in good steeds is Sindhu, rich in robes, rich in gold, nobly-fashioned, rich in ample wealth. Blest Silamavati and young Urnavati invest themselves with raiment rich in store of sweets. Sindhu hath yoked her car, light-rolling, drawn by steeds, and with that car shall she win..."[BG 10.27: || uccaiḥśravasam aśvānāḿ viddhi mām || ~ "Of horses know Me to be Uccaiḥśravā."]|A masculine river is called "Nad", a feminine one "Nadi". ~ Of all the Vedic rivers, the Sindhu is both masculine and feminine.

[NoteThe SarasvatI is (also) called "she with seven sisters" (saptasvasā). ~ The 'Sapta Sindhu' ("seven rivers" - Vedic Sapta Sindhavaḥ; "Sindhu" means river, stream or ocean in Sanskrit) refers to the rivers SuturI (Sutlej), VipASa (Beas), AsiknI (Chenab), ParuSNI (Ravi), VitastA (Jhelum), Sindhu (Indus) andprobably KubhA. | 'Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs' ~ does this fairy tale allude to SarasvatI and the seven rivers - "she with seven sisters" (saptasvasā)? ~ The story may have undergone several variations and/or may have been largely unrelated.]

Devi Sarasvati represent the divine forces in play in the growth, expansion and evolution of the Universe. This aspect of the growth of the Universe is thus steeped with the knowledge of all that has transpired since the moment of Creation and continues to drive the further evolution of the Universe. This driving force of knowledge is called as the divinity Sarasvatias it is a knowledge that continues to flow through the expanse of the cosmos gracefully and incessantly like waves. [Saras means gracefully flowing.] ~ This knowledge power forms the root for all forms of knowledge, speech (vak), skill, arts, fine arts, craft etc. ~ Sarasvati is therefore the divinity that promotes the development of all of these capabilities in mankind, society and civilization. |Goddess Sarasvati is (thus) Vishva Nath - Sovereign or Monarch (Nath) of the Universe and Lord of Creation. ~ She is Mahat - Higher Soul or Guiding Spirit. (Mahat means literally the Great One, and is also interpreted as meaning universal mind or cosmic intelligence). Goddess Sarasvati is Ishvari - the Cosmic Entity (~ Cosmic Ruler and Cosmic Teacher/Steward-mentor - the Primordial or Primal Being). She is the motive power and guiding spirit (Mahat) behind the mathematically precise universes. She is the supreme power/authority of the universe/cosmos - adhaataa (above whom there is no other). |Goddess Sarasvati is alsothe manifestation of the impersonal, unmanifested'Primal Creative Energy' (~ known as 'Aadi Shakti' or 'Brahm-jyotih' - the Absolute OM - the impersonal (nirguna), unmanifested or avyaktah, Niraakar Brahmn - Cosmic Light or Light Divine. In other words: divine effulgence). |Aadi = Primal or Primordial; Shakti = Creative Energy; Aadi Shakti = Primal Creative Energy. |Goddess Sarasvati is thus the highest possible conception of the impersonal (nirguna), unmanifested or avyaktah, Niraakar Brahmn (the Absolute OM - Cosmic Light or Light Divine or divine effulgence - Brahm-jyotih or 'Aadi Shakti' - Primal Creative Energy). |Goddess Sarasvati is (thus)manifested Brahmn - vyaktah, saguna, Saakar Brahmn. She is therefore, Omswaroop - manifestation of the Absolute OM - Cosmic Light or Light Divine (~ 'Brahm-jyotih'or 'Aadi Shakti' - Divine Effulgence). Hence, She is also known as Brahm-putri. [Here, 'putri' = manifestation, personification or embodiment.]

Thus, it is said: The seen(manifested - vyaktah, Saakar, saguna Brahmn) and the unseen (impersonal, unmanifested- nirguna, avyaktah, Niraakar Brahmn) are both one. | Thus the Absolute OM ('Brahm-Jyotih' or 'Aadi Shakti') and Mahat (Higher Soul or Guiding Spirit - universal mind, cosmic intelligence) or Ishvari (the Cosmic Entity - Cosmic Ruler and Cosmic Teacher/Steward-mentor - the Primordial or Primal Being) are both one.

The Devi Mahatmyam ('The Magnanimity of the Goddess', also known as the Sri Sri chandipATh) celebrates both the aspects (manifested and unmanifested OM).

~ Here is 'Pratham Aadi Taba Shakti': link. 

'Tumi Aadikabi, Kabiguru tumi heye' ~ Maharshi Valmiki is known as "Aadikavi". | Tagore says that Valmiki overcame his negative karma (prarabda karma) and compiled the Ramayana ('The Exertions of Sri Ram') - due to Goddess Sarasvati's blessings. | Tagore himself is called "Bishwa-Kabi", which means the poet of the world (universal bard), he is sometimes also called "Kabiguru", which means the guru of poets. His genius enriched whatever it touched. ~ In this composition Tagore hints at his source of inspiration; he also credits the Goddess for his multifaceted talent and vast oeuvre.

........................................................................

The impersonal (nirguna - without qualities) and unmanifested (avyaktah, niraakar - without form) Brahmn (~ the Absolute OM - 'Brahm-jyotih' or 'Aadi Shakti' - Primal Creative Energy - Divine Effulgence or Cosmic Light) is defined as the one self-existent impersonal spirit - the Divine Essence, from which all things emanate, by which they are sustained, and to which they return. | The impersonal Absolute OM is beyond all thought. | Primal Creative Energy ('Brahm-jyotih' or 'Aadi Shakti') does not mean feminine energy. Energy has no form or gender. ~ Primal Cosmic Energy is Purusha - Cosmic Energy or Supreme Cosmic Spirit. | The Cosmic Entity or Primal Being is Purushottama (Supreme Being) or Purushottama Satya - Supreme Godhead. | The impersonal Absolute OM is Omprakash (Cosmic Light or Light Divine). The Almighty is Omswaroop - manifestation of the impersonal, unmanifested Absolute OM.

BG 11.12: || divi surya-sahasrasya bhaved yugapad utthita yadi bhah sadrisi sa syad bhasas tasya mahatmanah || ~ "If the radiance of a thousand suns were to suddenly come forth in the sky, that would be like the light of the (impersonal, unmanifested - nirguna, avyaktah, niraakar) Brahmn - the Absolute OM."|[Mahatmanah = Supreme Cosmic Energy. | Krishn is referring to the impersonal, unmanifested Brahmn (the Absolute OM - Primal Creative Energy) - 'Brahm-jyotih' or 'Aadi Shakti' (i.e. Cosmic Light or Light Divine - divine effulgence). 

The impersonal (nirguna - without qualities), unmanifested or avyaktah, Niraakar Brahmn (the Absolute OM - Cosmic Light or Light Divine or divine effulgence - 'Brahm-jyotih' or 'Aadi Shakti') is the light (divine effulgence) that impersonalists perceive in the Nirguna(without qualities) orunmanifested (avyaktah, Niraakar - formless) mode of God/Almighty.

All creation-related work is the work of Fire (i.e. Cosmic Fire - Cosmic Light, Light Divine - Brahm-jyotih or the impersonal, unmanifested'Aadi Shakti' - Primal Creative Energy.) ... The impersonal, unmanifestedBrahmn (the Absolute OM) is thus revered as the Supreme Creator(Srashtaa).

~ This is the basis of Advaita(monism).

Goddess Sarasvati is Omswaroop - manifestation of the Absolute OM(~ impersonal, unmanifested'Brahm-jyotih' / 'Brahma-jyotih' or 'Aadi Shakti' - Primal Creative Energy). ~ She istherefore, Brahm-putri or Brahma-putri - manifestation or personification of the impersonal, unmanifested Absolute OM (~ Cosmic Light or Light Divine or Divine Effulgence - impersonal 'Brahm-jyotih' or 'Aadi Shakti').

... Thus, Goddess Sarasvati is the Cosmic Entity... and can also be called the saguna, vyaktah, saakar Goddess Aadi Shakti. | The impersonal, unmanifested Absolute OM and the manifested OM (the Almighty - Cosmic Entity) together possesses the Power of the three cosmic phenomenons of Srsstti-Sthiti-Vinaashaanaam - i.e. the Power of Creation, Maintenance/Preservation and Dissolution (~ distinguished by the names: Brahma-Vishnu-Shivah/Rudra).

~ This is the basis of Dvaita(dualism or duality).

~ Brahma-Vishnu-Shivah is simply the names of the three aspects of the cosmic phenomenon of Creation,Maintenance/Preservation and Dissolution, respectively. 

Keshavah - one who is the three. | Keshavah = kah Brahma, ah Vishnu and Isa Shiva ~ indicating the power of Creation, Maintenance/Preservation and Dissolution (i.e. the three aspects of the cosmic phenomenon of Creation, Maintenance/Preservation and Dissolution). |If we comprehend the Advaita and the Dvaita aspects we can then understand what the Cosmic Trimurti of 'Shiva-Brahma-Vishnu' and 'Parvati-Sarasvati-Lakshmi' indicates. ~ The first Trimurti indicates the impersonal, unmanifested Absolute OM. The second Trimurti represents the manifested OM - the Almighty. | The impersonal, unmanifested Absolute OM/Brahmn is the Supreme Cosmic Spirit - Primal Creative Energy. ~ The manifested Brahmn/OM or the Almighty - Universal Consciousness or universal mind or cosmic intelligence is the manifestation of the impersonal Absolute OM/Brahmn... and is therefore, the Higher Self or Supersoul - Atman or Param-atma. ... Thus, the latent spiritual energy within humans - kundalini energy - is associated with the Almighty.

~ The Cosmic Entity or Ishvari is asankhyeyah (with countless names and forms). She is also known as Narayan or Narayani. | Narayan or Narayani does not indicate gender; it means: refuge of all living entities. ~ Even Ishvar or Ishvari does not indicate gender; both mean: Cosmic Entity or Almighty.|The Cosmic Entity is also kartaa: The doer, maargah: The path, and neyah: The guide. [This is indicative of Her role as the Cosmic Ruler/Monarch + Cosmic Teacher and Steward-mentor.] ~ Thus, She is Sarasvati (the Creator) - and is, therefore, depicted along with the impersonal, unmanifested cosmic Brahma (the Supreme Creator or Srashtaa aspect of the Absolute OM). Goddess Sarasvati/Narayani is also the Stabilizer/Preserver/Maintainer - of all the worlds; thus She is depicted as Lakshmi alongside the impersonal, unmanifested cosmic Vishnu (the Sustainer/Maintainer or Preserver aspect of the Absolute OM). Goddess Sarasvati is also the manifestation of the impersonal, unmanifested'Brahm-jyotih' or 'Aadi Shakti' - Primal Creative Energy, the Absolute OM - and hence, She is (also) depicted as Shakti/Parvati alongside the impersonal, unmanifested cosmic Shiva (the dissolution aspect of the Absolute OM). ~ This should perhaps explain why Shiva and Rudra too have a syncretic form. The manifested, saguna Trimurti of 'Sarasvati-Lakshmi-Parvati' is the manifested Rudra. |The impersonal, unmanifested'Aadi Shakti' or Absolute OM, as Brahma (the Supreme Creator or Srashtaa) has created fourteen planetary systems; the impersonal, unmanifested'Aadi Shakti' or Absolute OM sustains, maintains and preserves the universe as Vishnu (the Stabilizer/Preserver/Maintainer of the cosmos) and dissolves the universe at the end of maha-kalpa as Shiva or Rudra. |If we understand this, we will fully comprehend what 'Shiva-Brahma-Vishnu' and 'Parvati-Sarasvati-Lakshmi' indicate, i.e. what the holy Trimurti is all about.|If we understand the concept of Rudra-Shakti (the syncretic form ~ to create brahma-ranhdra, the transcendence of both) - all the aspects of the holy trimurti can be understood.

And then, we can also fully comprehend the following verses:

|| eko vai nārāyaṇa āsīn na brahmā na īśāno nāpo nāgni-samau neme dyāv-āpṛthivī nanakṣatrāṇi na sūryaḥ || ~ "In the beginning of the creation there was onlythe Primal/Primeval Being Nārāyaṇa. There was no Brahmā, no Śiva, no water, no fire,nomoon, no stars in the sky, no sun."

|| nārāyaṇaḥ paro devas tasmāj jātaś caturmukhaḥ tasmād rudro 'bhavad devaḥ sa ca sarva-jñatāḿ gataḥ || ~ "Nārāyaṇa is the Supreme/Primordial/Primeval Being ~ from whom Brahmā was born, from whom Śiva was born."

BG 15.12: || yadaadityagatam tejo jagad bhaasayate'khilam yacchandramasi  yacchaagnau tattejo viddhi maamakam || ~ "That  light which, residing in the sun, illumines the whole world, that which is in the moon and in the fire - know that light as Mine." 

"You shine, all living things emerge. You disappear, they go to rest. Recognizing our innocence, O golden-haired Sun, arise; let each day be better than the last." ~  the Rig Veda.

BG 10.33: || dhātāhaḿ viśvato-mukhaḥ|| ~ "and of creators I am Brahmā." 

BG 10.23: || rudranam sankaras casmi || ~ "Of all the Rudras I am Sankara" [Rudra-Śiva].

BG 10.33: || aham evākṣayaḥ kālo || ~ "I am also inexhaustible time."

And, BG 10.34: || mṛtyuḥ sarva-haraś cāham udbhavaś ca bhaviṣyatām || ~ "I am all-consuming time, and I am the generating principle/cause/energy of all that is yet to be." (~ Alternatively: "I am all-consuming time, and I am too the birth of all that shall come into being.")

... And then, we will also understand why unlike the rigorous monism (Advaita) of the Upanishads, the Srimad Bhagavad-Gita also integrates dualism or duality (Dvaita) and theism (āstika).

The Upanishads: || As is the human body, so is the cosmic body
As is the human mind, so is the cosmic mind.
As is the microcosm, so is the macrocosm.
As is the atom, so is the universe ||

~ After a cycle of universal dissolution (when the manifest cosmos is completely dissolved), the Absolute OM recreates the cosmos. ~ The rest of the above verse possibly is indicative of some aspects of what the Large Hadron Collider is endeavouring to achieve.

Maybe: After a cycle of universal dissolution (when the manifest cosmos is completely dissolved), the Absolute OM decides (in a manner of speaking) to recreate the cosmos so that we jiva-souls (individual souls or mere Self) can experience worlds of shape and solidity. ~ Maybe: very subtle atoms begin to combine, eventually generating a cosmic wind that blows heavier and heavier atoms together. ~ Maybe: Jiva-souls, depending on their (cumulative) karma - earned in previous world systems, spontaneously draw to themselves atoms that coalesce into an appropriate body. 

On a side note: This cumulative karma (including carried over prarabda karma or negative karma) probably also affects or impacts their lives ~ thereby shaping the societal or world conditions. ~ The resultant actions (including weakness of attitude, crudity - lack of refinement of thought, or misguided actions driven by base emotions such as avarice, malice etc) impact society. ~ It is human follies and frailties, failings, mindless acts, prejudices and so on that shape the societal and world conditions. ["Weakness of attitude becomes weakness of character."|"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage - to move in the opposite direction."|"Great spirits have often encountered violent opposition from weak minds." ~ Albert Einstein.] | Human failings and follies cannot be ascribed to the Almighty or to destiny. [It is part of human prarabda karma or negative karma.]  God is sublime. God is subtle. God integrates empirically. God does not play dice. |"What destiny had in store" (meant in a negative or retrogressive connotation) - is part of a long list of callous and shallow idioms and colloquial sayings. It merely reflects the ignorance of those responsible for the coinage and perpetuation of such phraseology. | Various ailments and disorders too can be traced to health and hygiene issues, lifestyle issues, heredity, stress, environmental factors, chemical content, pollution, and so on. |"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." ~ Albert Einstein. | E.g. 'test by fire' is indicative of hardships or the vicissitudes of life. But mindless/negative/retrogressive thinking (by humans) can turn it into something else. Similarly, 'nose-cut' indicates hurt ego or pride or affront arising out of perceived slights. ~ And yet, mindless/negative/retrogressive thinking (by humans) can give it a totally different connotation. 

Sri Ram and his siblings were born due to advanced IVF therapy; their deeds benefited society, and so, humans born due to IVF therapy were accepted (while Dvapar rejected genetically engineered and cloned humans). This would have helped childless couples. | Due to the efforts of Sri Ram and his associates, Treta also accepted certain groups of humans (such as the vaan-nar or forest (vaan)-dwelling human (nar) - adivasi or vaan-vasi, as well as the 'tritiya prakriti') as full-fledged humans, with a distinct 'way of life'. ~ Hanuman-ji is depicted with a tail, this is allegorical - perhaps an allusion that prior to Sri Ram's efforts to mainstream them, these groups of humans were not considered as full-fledged humans. Maybe, they were considered as sub-humans or part of the animal world. [~ Hanuman-ji, Sugreeva, Angad, Riksharaj Jambavan, Nishadaraj Guhaka or Guha, etc were forest-dwellers. Vaan-nar Sena was an army peopled with forest dwellers.]|'Lakshman Rekha' is a Tulsidas terminology. |'Golden deer' is a reference to destiny (Goddess Sarasvati - Varadey Kaamarupinee [kamadhenu] - the fulfiller of wishes ~ provided one is deserving and makes the required effort). ['Maayabanobiharini Harini': link.] ~ Mandodari - Ravana's queen - was Sita's mother; both were so alike that even Hanuman-ji was confused. It is unlikely that Ravana attended Sita's Svayamvara. It probably came about courtesy later re-telling, folk theatre, and the like. ~ Tulsidas was also instrumental in starting the folk event/folk theatre (village costume drama) known as Ram-lila. | Ravana, an Arya, succumbed to his excessive ego (hubris) and vaulted self-image, besides he was probably misled by his over-achingly ambitious son - Meghnaad. [Ravana's ten heads alludes to his excessive vanity and exaggerated self-image - his temperament flaws; it also represents ten kingdoms. Despite this, Ravana was not a Cakravartin-raja. ~ Top-heavy - 'too many cooks spoil the broth'.] ~ After the fall of Ravana, and the dismantling of various destructive weaponry (including gigantic humanoid-robots fitted with an assortment of weaponry ['Kumbhakarna'], nuclear weapons - euphemistically referred to as 'Shiva-dhanush' and potent nerve agents) - the sagacious Vibhisana (Ravana's younger brother) was crowned king by Sri Ram. ... And yet, we have been burning Vibhisana's effigy with gusto ~ possibly a legacy of post Gupta era stage-plays and folk theatre. [~ The Ramayana ('The Exertions of Sri Ram') has over 3,000 re-telling and/or versions, not to mention the numerous poems and colloquial sayings based on it.] |In all likelihood, Hanuman-ji was fair complexioned, the colour of vajra (thunder). Hanu = jaw in Sanskrit, probably indicative of a large jaw. ~ Hanuman-ji could not have set fire to Lanka with his tail - he was not a monkey; he was human. This too (probably) is a result of later dramatics, folk theatre, and the like. Also, indulging in plunder and pillage was most un-Arya-like (ignoble); it is unlikely that Sri Ram, one of the finest of Aryas, ever indulged in such activities. Besides, Vibhishana (an ally of Sri Ram) succeeded Ravana. What would he have governed over then? | Maharshi Valmiki and Sri Ram were not contemporaries. Sri Ram had nothing to do with the concept of "race" either. | As for Lakshman and Urmila: they remained apart for 14 years - owing to Lakshman's dedication and a sense of duty towards bringing about certain positive societal change. ~ Maybe, it was a mutual decision to not involve her; Sita's presence, on the other hand, was required - to fructify the larger goals and objectives. Maybe, Urmila had some other role (pertaining to administrative functions). We don't quite know. ~ However, Lakshman and Urmila remained committed to each other - throughout those 14 long years. It's a personal thing. ~ There have been several great humans who have ventured beyond their personal comforts and happiness... to work for the larger good; the world is a better place due to their efforts and contributions. | Sri Hanuman probably was a highly skilled pilot, and flew a variety of aircraft (vimana). This (perhaps) has been mistranslated as 'Hanuman-ji carried Ram and Lakshman on his shoulders'. 'Pavan-putra' = Airman. | Also, Sri Ram could look beyond the mundane. And so, when Shabari - a rustic lady, offered him some wild berries - after personally tasting them (to determine their sweetness), he unhesitatingly accepted them. He saw the thought behind the (apparently unsophisticated) gesture; most people would have considered it as an affront. He did not sit on a pedestal either. Therefore, paintings and iconography depicting Sri Hanuman kneeling in front of Sri Ram with folded hands, is a result of post Gupta era art (~ and may have given rise to certain perceptions and cultural schisms). ~ BG 9.26: || patram pushpam phalam toyam yo me bhaktya prayacchati tad aham bhakty-upahritam asnami prayatatmanah || ~ "Whoever offers Me a leaf, a flower, a fruit or water - with love, devotion or a clear/pure consciousness (prayatatmanah), I will accept it." ~ He is essentially saying that he sees, appreciates and values the thought behind the gesture. Not the offering itself. |Sri Ram's actions not only helped create a better/progressive society but also gave him the required gravitas and goodwill... once he ascended the throne; he (probably) deferred the coronation, Kaikeyi and Manthara aided him. ~ His 14-years-long exile was (very likely) a voluntary one; in his absence, (Kaikeyi's son) Bharata - younger to Ram but older than (Sumitra's twins) Lakshman and Shatrughna - was an acceptable alternative. [He may not have acquiesced on his own, though; 'coz even in Ram's absence he chose to sit next to the throne.] ~ Raja Dasarath was suffering from an assortment of old age-related ailments, and was (thus) keen on arranging the coronation. Sri Ram, however, (probably) was keen to defer it, 'coz as Dasarath's heir he wouldn't have had the required gravitas to bring about (i.e. implement) perception and mindset change - leading to sustainable (organic) social reform (~ 'coz no amount of royal decree would have achieved it; mere platitudes and/or text will not change or curb deep-seated retrogressive perceptions, mindset and conditioning; there is no other way to implement measures leading to positive social change - especially if it involves attitudinal change, etc - except through steadfast/dedicated karm-yog - sustained actions); besides, kingly duties, etc would have straitjacketed him.  ~ BG 10.31: || pavanaḥ pavatām asmi rāmaḥ śastra-bhṛtām aham || ~ "I am the wind among the purifiers, and Sri Ram among the warriors" ~ i.e. warrior against moribund aspects, retrogressive mindset, worldview, and the like. |The person of action (karm yogi) does not withdraw, but cheerfully embraces struggle and toil as the ideal in life. (~ Sri Ram accepted continuous struggle and toil as being intrinsic to bringing about positive societal change; change in firmly held/ingrained mindset, viewpoints, conditioning, perceptions and so on. 'Coz it also involves course correction, including resetting/redirection of humanity/society's inner compass... and so, cannot be sustained by ephemeral whims of the moment. Besides, mere classroom teaching or textbook knowledge does not ensure a progressive outlook). For a nishkam karm yogi, selflessness consists of the renunciation of personal desire (a carefree life, personal glory, praise, accolades, and the like), not of action itself.

The Ramayana War did not happen over riches or territories. The major reasons for the Ramayana War was to destroy/dismantle dangerous weaponry (including nuclear weapons, gigantic humanoid-robots like "Kumbhakarna" and potent nerve agents) + to bring about mindset and attitudinal change (via-a-vis certain groups of humans, like the vaan-nars - forest-dwelling (vaan) human (nar), the "tritiya prakriti" + humans born out of advanced IVF therapy). Sri Ram 'breaking the Shiva-dhanush' = dismantling of the "Shiva-dhanush" or Pinaka - euphemism for the most destructive nuclear weapons - after an all-round agreement/general consensus (though it is unlikely to have happened during Sita's Svayamvara, although Sita-ji too knew how to dismantle the "Shiva-dhanush"). |"Jal-samadhi" could be an allusion to the "Byomkesh" metaphor, since unlike the Krishna-avatar, the Ram-avatar is depicted with a jata. [Note: Byomkesh is derived from byom/vyom(sky or air) and kesh (hair). ~ Lord Shiva received into his dredlocks (jata) the Ganga - to minimize the immense impact (devastation) of her fall. It is a reference to the metaphoric or allegoric tide/torrent of the Ganga that Lord Shiva is supposed to have held in his jata (dredlocks) and (thus) become Byomkesh. (This Ganga is a metaphor; it is not a reference to any river per se.) ~ Perhaps it is an allegory to indicate that his actions saved/protected humanity/society from great misery and/or mitigated (in force or intensity) the long-term damage. Maybe, it brought about a turnaround - a positive change of course, and helped lay the foundation for a new and better society to emerge.] | Jatayu (and his brother Sampati) were not birds but humans belonging to the Shakuna clan (~ an ancient group or clan that displayed a vulture-totem or insignia). Therefore, Raavan could not have slashed Jatayu's wings. Also, Sita could not have lamented, cried and shouted for help theatrically, then thrown down her jewelry from an aircraft (vimana); none can open windows of a vimana up in the sky. ~ These are probably later additions (very likely post Gupta era) - courtesy folk theatre, re-telling, village/stage plays, etc. Raavan also especially deputed Vibhishana's wife, Sarama, to look after Sita during the latter's period of "captivity" at Ashoka-Vatika. However, even after his vanity had got the better of him, and despite all that Meghnaad was up to, it was none other than Vibhishana who assured Ram... that Ravana will never let any harm come to Sita. (Vibhisana had by then come over to Ram's side. ~ But even then, i.e. even after Vibhishana joining forces with Ram, his wife, Sarama, continued to stay in Lanka, and continued to look after Sita; Ravana never harassed her). ~ And, this is not surprising. It was a different era, when Arya Dharma was prevalent, hence Treta is regarded as the "Silver Age". The Aryas followed certain ethics even when they fought wars. ~ They did not indulge in pillage; they did not harm the trees or livestock, nor pollute the water-bodies. They also did not cause any harm to the elderly, children and the womenfolk, rather it would have been unthinkable for an Arya man to take revenge on even his staunchest rival... via the latter's womenfolk. It would not only have been most un-Arya-like (ignoble), but also considered as the height of cowardice. (~ Such behaviour was befitting of Yavanas and Mlechchas). ... Misbehaviour with or abuse of women was considered as the lowest of the lowest of 'paap' (sin) that anyone could ever commit; such actions were believed to condemn the perpetrator eternally to the lowest of the Hellish Planets. [~ A shocked Hanuman-ji said as much to Meghnaad... when the latter beat and beheaded a humanoid of Sita on the battlefield... in a bid to break the morale of the Vaan-nar Sena.] | Meghnaad resorting to 'illusion' indicates the usage of various technologies, which the later translators were unable to comprehend. Besides, Meghnaad may have been a name that Ravan's son (eventually) came to be identified with. [Megh = cloud; Naad = sound, roar.] It could be that his vimana/aircraft broke the sound barrier (thus, Meghnaad). As for Meghnaad 'disappearing behind a cloud' - perhaps, his vimana left a trail of smoke. ~ Kumbhakarna was not Raavan's younger "brother", but a gigantic humanoid-robot equipped with a variety of weaponry; it was probably capable of inflicting enormous damage in the battlefield. ~ Maybe our ancients called such a humanoid-robot (Yantra), 'brhma-daitya'. Brhma comes from 'Brh', which means: to grow or to expand. Daitya = in this case: gigantic-sized. ... And this (probably) got mistranslated to 'a brāhmaṇa ghost' or 'the ghosts of brahmans, living in the fig trees, the pipal (ficus religiosa), or the banyan (ficus indica), awaiting liberation (mukti or salvation) or reincarnation (rebirth ~ i.e. continuation in the cycle of samsara)'. [~ Ghatotkacha was a 'Kumbhakarna'-equivalent in Dvapar. |Ghatam indicates: laboratory. Utkoch or utkaca = reward, product, outcome, gift, present.] He was a highly advanced humanoid robot, very human-like in appearance (android - male), but with robot or machine-like strength, flexibility and assorted abilities. And so, he could increase in size and turn himself into a gigantic figure.]

~ Bheeshma, Dronacharya, Dhritarashtra, Pandu, Vidur, Karna, the Kauravas and the Pandavas, Draupadi and her brother, Drishtadumna, Ghatotkach, etc - were all 'born' or begotten through various medical and scientific procedures (including advanced genetic engineering and cloning technology). They were unnatural humans (human-like humanoids and/or humanoid-robots); they could not procreate naturally. | Bheeshma refused to get himself cloned. ~ He was the outcome of genetic material taken from multiple sources - 'born' after seven unsuccessful attempts. The metaphor of 'shara-sajya' or 'bed of arrows' has been used to indicate his humanoid-ness. Besides, it is also indicative of karma catching up with him (the Krishn-avatar is Rudra-Siva and is associated with arrows. [Rudra is called "the archer" (Sanskrit: Śarva) and the arrow is an essential attribute of Rudra. The names Dhanvin ("bowman") and Bāṇahasta(baanahasta = "archer", literally: "Armed with arrows in hands"/ Bāṇa = arrow, hasta = hand) also refer to archery - the archer. Rudra is described as armed with a bow and fast-flying arrows (baan/bāṇa).] ~ Bheeshma chose silence, and preferred to remain a mere spectator - over doing his duty as an influential elder - when Duryodhan and Dushyasana were attempting to fructify certain negative actions. | Draupadi's five sons (one by each of the Pandavas): Prativindhya, Sutasoma, Srutakirti, Satanika and Srutakarma are said to have been spitting images of their respective fathers - the 5 Pandavas. This again points towards cloning. ~ Therefore, 'the Pandavas announcing to Kunti their arrival with excellent "alms", and a supposedly busy Kunti replying without turning to look at Draupadi (the supposed "alms") and advising/ordering the brothers to share the "alms" equally amongst the five of them' ~ is a later-day re-telling, courtesy translators - who, unable to understand technology, etc incorporated their own thinking. | There was no renunciation or sacrifice from Bheeshma (Devavrat)... to pave the way for Santanu-Satyavati's progeny to ascend the throne. Maharaj Shantanu never had a consort/queen by the name "Ganga"; here Ganga = a laboratory. ['Ganga-putra' = laboratory-born, or of 'virgin-birth'. ~ It is an euphemism for humans 'born' out of a laboratory process via highly advanced medical technology... where even the gestation happened outside the human body in pitcher-shaped incubators that acted as the surrogate womb.] ~ Maharaj Shantanu probably fully understood the consequences of unnatural humans (human-like humanoids) populating the earth, and hence was keen to have human progeny. Once he found Satyavati, she became the queen of Hastinapura. ~ It is possible that Devavrat too understood the outcome of unnatural humans roaming the earth and its effect on civilization, and so, took a firm decision (euphemistically mentioned as: undertook an unwavering vow or kathor vrat) - to not clone or replicate himself - ever. ... This probably is the reason behind his other more famous name (sobriquet): Bheeshm or Bhishma (meaning, unwavering - a reference to his unwavering decision). | As for Dronacharya: Droṇa implies that he too was gestated in a droṇa (vessel) - an incubator (drona) that acted as the surrogate womb. Jarasandha (literally meaning "joined by Jara") too was a product of stem cell technology (gone wrong). Alternatively: he may have been a conjoined baby. ~ Jara (or Barmata - an adivasi vyadh/doctor) either: #1. separated the underdeveloped-stillborn twin (via a surgical procedure) or #2. stitched up gaping wounds, perhaps even gangrene, or maybe 'completed' an 'incomplete' or ill-developed/underdeveloped human body - with the help of material taken from other sources (including the stillborn twin). Thus Jarasandha lived. ~ However, Krishn's choice of the mighty Bheem to grapple (wrestle) with Jarasandha is allegorical; Krishna's gesture of breaking a twig and throwing both the parts in opposite direction has been mistranslated as instructing Bheem to tear up Jarasandha's body. |Balaram, was transferred from Devaki's womb to Rohini's womb (via embryo transfer). Here 'Rohini' is a reference to an incubator - that acted as a surrogate womb, just like 'Ganga' is a reference/metaphor for a lab. Vasuki was the king/chieftain of the Nag clan - that displayed a serpent totem or insignia. As for Krishna's sister Subhadra, she too was born of 'Rohini' - an incubator - that acted as a surrogate womb. |Dhritarashtra, Pandu and Vidur were 'born' due to advanced medical technology... courtesy Maharshi Vedavyas (original name: Krishna Dwaipayana ~ he was conceived in a secluded place when visibility was low due to the presence of heavy mist or thick fog - localized fog. ~ Veda Vyas growing up instantly after birth = he was an exceptionally prodigious child). |~ Perhaps the technique was yet to be perfected; and so, none of them were 'born' completely healthy. E.g., Dhritarashtra was visually challenged, while Pandu was anemic (pandu = pale) and probably had other ailments too. Neither could procreate naturally. Hence Gandhari, Kunti and Madri had to take the help of advanced medical technology - in order to beget progeny. |The Kauravas were born as a result of a 'test-tube' process, wherein even their gestation happened in pitcher-shaped incubators, outside their mother's womb. ... And given that Gandhari "gave birth to a hard piece of lifeless flesh" after "two years" of remaining "pregnant", one cannot rule out the involvement of stem cellsand cloning technology either. Advanced 'Parthenogenesis' is a possibility as well.|Draupadi (original name: Krishna) was 'fire-born', meaning: she was of 'virgin-birth' - 'born' out of a laboratory process... with no human involvement whatsoever; hence her gestation too happened in incubators, which acted as the surrogate womb. The same is applicable for Dhristadyumna. |Note:'Homa' = a technological procedure. 'Brahma' = a reference to whoever possesses the know-how or is the chief scientist. 'Brahma's boon' = a reference to knowledge transfer and/or a successful experiment/process/procedure. 'Yagna' = a metaphor used to indicate a laboratory and/or a technological process per se. 'Yagya-gaar' = the laboratory or place where the research or process/procedure is being conducted. (Gaar = room, here it is indicative of a laboratory where a technological process is underway.) 'Yagnakunda' = a metaphor to indicate the 'specifics' of any laboratory or technological process. In other words: the 'instruments' or the 'method' used in any laboratory or technological process. 'Agni' = a metaphor to indicate the 'outcome' of a laboratory/scientific/technological or medical process.]|Therefore, we can only wonder as to how different this planet has been and how different the humans had been.|The Krishna-avatar put a halt toall experiments directed at creating unnatural humans (human-like humanoids) ~ thereby helping the human species and civilization on earth to progress naturally and peacefully; he also helped restore the gender balance.

Even the Mahabharata ('The Great History of the Bharatas'| Bharatas refers to the Puruvansh or clan/lineage - referlink1) is a completely different story. ~ Its scale, sweep and grandeur are immensely fascinating. | The people of ancient civilizations not only possessed the most vaulting imaginations but also extremely advanced technology - that the modern world is as yet unaware of. ~ They had much more knowledge and sophisticated technology at their disposal than most of us moderns (given our linear view of history) - are willing to give them credit for. | Dvapar saw highly advanced technology (including advanced genetic engineering and cloning technology) - and yet, none of the versions of the 'Mahabharata' (the outcome of numerous retelling) refer to the scientific and/or technological aspects. ~ This great history has instead been reduced to a family feud ~ possibly, an indicator of the post Gupta era flounder - i.e. decline in civilizational values + intellectual decline... when the cradle of knowledge (science included) was forced into a quagmire - courtesy extreme myopia, selfish and unifocal world-view, cynicism and so on (~ the proverbial "dreary desert sand of dead habit"). ~ It proved to be detrimental, counterproductive and self-defeating. | In fact, it wasn't quite a nation either, but numerous squabbling principalities, satrapies, and the like. | An objective assessment (however) indicates that colonization, despite its excesses, was part of the solution. ... After all, the colonizers did leave us with various scientific innovations and a ready infrastructure, a link language, an education system, an electoral system, other institutions and frameworks, and so on. ~ All of which was indeed crucial in equipping us to connect + interact + integrate with the rest of the world. We were reasonably prepared for the new world system that emerged. [Colonization also helped stem the internal stagnation and decay.] Besides, several of our popular sporting events are courtesy colonial rule... and subsequent engagement with the wider world.| Even Tagore, though critical of the excesses and exploitation of colonial rule, did not reject western civilization per se. "... I am not for thrusting off Western civilization and becoming segregated in our independence." ~ He advised intellectual rigueur and intellectual engagement, instead of national selfishness ("narrow domestic walls") and cynical/specious arguments (~ "where the clear stream of reason has not lost its way into the dreary desert sand of dead habit" ~ is indicative of a civilization and/or civilizational values and ideals in decline. Stream = the River SarasvatI). ~ He recognized the importance of what India could learn - from other nations/cultures/peoples - to/for her own benefit and progress. ~ "If Providence wants England to be the channel of that communication, of that deeper association, I am willing to accept it with all humility. I have great faith in human nature, and I think the West will find its true mission."| He also believed that the responsibility of a great future must be "untrammelled by the grasping miserliness of a past."| Tagore's vision was to take on a more holistic attitude towards understanding the dynamic spirit of his time (and beyond). ~ He also felt that the West should be capable of "imparting to the East what is best in herself, and of accepting in a right spirit the wisdom that the East has stored for centuries." ~ This is synergy creation at its best. ~ It is (after all) western innovation and technology that has helped build India's economic infrastructure. | Otherwise, the ritual-heavy straitjacket known as "Brahminical faith" (which gradually came about after the decline of the Gupta era) ~ would have ensured a perpetual "age of retrogressiveness, stagnation and decay" for this once-glorious nation. ~ Its legacy - a complete antithesis of the enlightened way of life (Sanaatan Dharma) - is an abiding embarrassment, as well as a cautionary note. [Brahmana is not to be misconstrued for "Brahminical Faith". Brahmana implies erudition; one who treads the path of knowledge, wisdom and enlightenment (the wisdom of knowledge). E.g. Chanakya was a Brahmana. He may very well have been a Vrishni.]

BG 9.8: || prakṛtiḿ svām avaṣṭabhya visṛjāmi punaḥ punaḥ bhūta-grāmam imaḿ kṛtsnamavaśaḿ prakṛter vaśāt || ~ "The whole cosmic order is under Me. Under My will it is automatically manifested again and again, and under My will it is dissolved at the end."

BG 9.10: || mayādhyakṣeṇa prakṛtiḥ sūyate sa-carācaram hetunānena kaunteya jagad viparivartate|| ~ "This material nature (Manifested Cosmos), which is one of My energies (a reference to the Absolute OM/Brahmn - Primal Creative Energy or Purusha), is working under My direction, O son of Kuntī, producing all moving and non-moving beings. Under its rule this manifestation is created and dissolved again and again." ~ The Almighty (saguna, saakar OM - 'Brahm-putri') is the Absolute/Eternal Truth (Sat/Satya) - the Eternal divine person/entity ~Puruṣa-uttama: greatest of all beings. ... While, the impersonal (nirguna - without qualities), unmanifested (avyaktah, niraakar - without form) Absolute OM/Brahmn is Comic Light, Light Divine or Divine Effulgence (~ impersonal 'Brahm-jyotih' or 'Aadi Shakti').

BG 9.17: || pitāham asya jagato mātā dhātā pitāmahaḥ vedyaḿ pavitram oḿkāra|| ~ "I am the father (pitā)of this universe (jagato), the mother (mātā), the support (dhātā) and the grandsire (pitāmahaḥ). I am the bestower of non-transient knowledge - the wisdom of knowledge (para vidya), the purifier (dispeller of unwanted aspects) and the syllable oḿ."| Omkara = the praṇava or Shabda Brahmn. The Almighty is saguna, manifested OM - Brahm-putri or Omswaroop.

BG 4.5: śrī-bhagavān uvāca (Sri Bhagavan said): || bahūni me vyatītāni janmāni tava cārjuna tāny ahaḿ veda sarvāṇi na tvaḿ vettha parantapa || ~ "O Arjun, many are the births I have passed through and thou too. But I know them all, whilst thou knowest not (i.e. I can remember all of them, but you cannot)."| Parantapa = one who concentrates the most.

BG 7.26: || vedaham samatitanivartamanani carjunabhavisyani ca bhutani mam tu veda na kascana || ~ "O Arjun, as the Supreme Godhead (the Almighty) I know everything that has happened in the past, all that is happening in the present, and all things that are yet to come. I also know all living entities; but Me no one knows." 

On (the cosmic phenomenon of) Creation: "None knoweth whence creation has arisen; And whether he has or has not produced it; He who surveys it in the highest heaven, He only knows, or haply he may know not." ~ the Rig Veda. [Note: Our ancient texts don't quite refer to the Absolute OM and/or the Almighty by gender (~ the Almighty exercises guardianship, care and governance over the universe at large). ~ "Purusha" does not mean male. Purusha = Cosmic Energy or Primal Creative Energy - the impersonal 'Brahm-jyotih' or 'Aadi Shakti'. There are two aspects to Brahmn - impersonal, unmanifested Absolute OM and the saguna, manifested Almighty - the Absolute Truth (Sat/Satya) and the eternal divine person/entity. ~ The Manifested Cosmos as well as the Manifested Nature is "Prakriti". | Primal Creative Energy ('Brahm-jyotih' or 'Aadi Shakti') does not mean feminine energy. Energy has no form or gender. ~ Primal Cosmic Energy is Purusha - Cosmic Energy or Supreme Cosmic Spirit.| The Cosmic Entity or Primal Being is Purushottama (Supreme Being) or Purushottama Satya - Supreme Godhead.]

BG 2.22|| vāsānsi jīrNāni yathā vihāya navāni grihNāti naro.aparāNi tathā śarīrāNi vihāya jīrNānyanyāni sanyāti navāni dehī || ~"Just as a human being puts on new garments, casting off old and worn-out ones, the (human) soul (Jiva-atma or mere Self) similarly takes up residence within new material bodies, giving up the old and infirm ones." 

... Thus, no two people are alike. Even identical twins are not alike in character traits, etc. 'Coz their souls (jiva-atma or mere Self) are different ~ even though they may be spitting images of each other, physically. 

The soul (jiva-atma or mere Self) is part of the impersonal (nirguna - without qualities) and unmanifested (avyaktah, niraakar - without form) Brahmn ~ the Absolute OM - 'Brahm-jyotih' or 'Aadi Shakti' - Primal Creative Energy - Divine Effulgence or Cosmic Light. | The impersonal Absolute OM/Brahmn isdefined asthe one self-existent impersonal spirit (energy) - the Divine Essence, from which all things emanate, by which they are sustained, and to which they return. |Primal Cosmic Energy is Purusha- Supreme Cosmic Spirit. ~ Spirit is energy. It has no form or gender. ~ Thus, the soul (jiva-atma or mere Self) too is energy; it has no form or gender; only the outer shell (material body) differs.

And so, a 'female soul' cannot be contained within a male material body, nor a 'male soul' be contained within a female material body. ~ Our ancients were clear about three kinds of humans. The third type was known as 'tritiya prakriti'.

BG 2.17: || avinasi tu tad viddhi yena sarvam idam tatam vinasam avyayasyasya na kascit kartum arhati || ~ "But know that which pervades the entire body is indestructible. No one is able to destroy the imperishable soul (jiva-atma) - individual soul or mere Self." 

BG 2.18: || antavanta ime deha nityasyoktah saririnah || ~ "Only the material body (outer shell) of the indestructible, immeasurable and eternal living entity (jiva-atma) is subject to destruction." | ... While the jiva-atma only transmigrates from one body to another body:

BG 2.20: || Na jãyate mriyate vã kadãchinnãyam bhootvã bhavitã vã na bhooyaha ajo nityaha shãshvato'yam purãno na hanyate hanyamãne shareere|| ~ "The individual soul (jiva-atma) never takes birth and never perishes at any time nor does it come into being again when the body is created. The individual soul (jiva-atma) is birthless, eternal, imperishable and timeless and is never destroyed even when the material body (outer shell) is destroyed (perishes)."

BG 10.23: || nainaṃ chindanti śastrāṇi nainaṃ dahati pāvakaḥ na cainaṃ kledayantyāpo na śoṣayati mārutaḥ ||"Weapons cleave It not, fire burns It not, water wets It not, wind dries It not. This self (jiva-atma or mere Self) cannot be cut, not burnt, nor get wet, nor dried up. It is eternal, all pervading, stable, immovable and ancient. This [self] is said to be un-manifested, unfathomable and unchangeable."| Krishn describes (to Arjun) the human soul (the individual soul or jiva-atma) as something that cannot be cut by weapons, cannot be burnt by fire, cannot be drowned in water, cannot be blown/dried by the wind. 

The soul (jiva-atma or mere Self) is part of the impersonal (nirguna - without qualities) and unmanifested (avyaktah, niraakar - without form) Brahmn ~ the Absolute OM - 'Brahm-jyotih' or 'Aadi Shakti' - Primal Creative Energy - Divine Effulgence or Cosmic Light. | The impersonal Absolute OM/Brahmn isdefined asthe one self-existent impersonal spirit (energy) - the Divine Essence, from which all things emanate, by which they are sustained, and to which they return. | Primal Cosmic Energy is Purusha- Supreme Cosmic Spirit. ~ Spirit is energy. It has no form or gender. ~ Thus, the soul (jiva-atma or mere Self) too is energy; it has no form or gender; only the outer shell (material body) differs. 

~ The "First Law of Thermodynamics" (Conservation) states that energy is always conserved; it cannot be created or destroyed. In essence, energy can be converted from one form into another. ~ 'Energy can be changed from one form to another, but it cannot be created or destroyed. The total amount of energy and matter in the Universe remains constant, merely changing from one form to another.'| Soul (jiva-atma or mere Self) is energy; it has no form or gender; only the outer shell (material body) differs. | For humans, there is no guarantee that the soul (jiva-atma or mere Self) won't transmigrate as (e.g.) an animal, bird, and so on. It all depends on one's karma.

The jiva-atma (individual consciousness) or mere Self = part and parcel of (i.e. created out of) the impersonal, unmanifested Absolute OM/Brahmn ~ Cosmic Light, Light Divine, Divine Effulgence - Primal Creative Energy.

The Atman or Param-atma/Para Brahmn (universal consciousness - universal mind or universal intelligence) = Cosmic Entity.

The Atman - Supersoul (Param-atma) or Higher Self or Higher Mind (Manas) - is indicative of the Cosmic Entity. | The mere Self or jiva-atma can unite, commune or confluence with the Higher Self or Param-atma (Atman) ~ only when the latent spiritual energy lying dormant at the base of the spine - kundalini energy - has been fully 'awakened'.  Kundalini is not associated with rote-learning or classroom teaching. ['Aaloker Ei Jharna Dharaaye Dhuiye Dao': link.]| The jiva-atma - lower mind (manas) or mere Self = individual consciousness. The Atman - higher mind (manas) or Higher Self = Universal Consciousness. 

Sat-Cit-Ananda: for purposes of comprehension and clarity: the function of the mind and the heart are completely different. None can think with their heart. ~ That is a colloquial phrase taken literally. |Citis not a reference to the heart. Cit is a reference to the mere Self (individual consciousness - sentience). While, Satis a reference to the Higher Self or Universal Consciousness (Param-atma or Supersoul). | The confluence of the Cit(mere Self or individual consciousness) with the Sat (Higher Self or universal consciousness) is brought about by the complete 'awakening' of the latent spiritual energy lying dormant at the base of the spine - the kundalini energy.

BG 9.4: || mayā tatam idaḿ sarvaḿ jagad avyakta-mūrtinā mat-sthāni sarva-bhūtāni na cāhaḿ teṣv avasthitaḥ || ~ "By Me, in My unmanifested form, this entire universe is pervaded. All beings are in Me, but I am not in them."|'All things are in Me' (mat-sthāni sarva-bhūtāni)= a reference to the impersonal, unmanifested Absolute OM/Brahmn - the one self-existent impersonal spirit (energy) - the Divine Essence, from which all things emanate, by which they are sustained, and to which they return. ~ The human soul (jiva-atma or mere Self) too is part of the impersonal (nirguna - without qualities) and unmanifested (avyaktah, niraakar - without form) Brahmn ~ the Absolute OM - 'Brahm-jyotih' or 'Aadi Shakti' - Primal Creative Energy ~ Divine Effulgence or Cosmic Light. |'But I am not in them' (na cāhaḿ teṣv avasthitaḥ) is a reference to the Higher Self or Supersoul (Atman) or Universal Consciousness (Param-atma). ~ Only through 'Self-realization' can the mere Self (individual consciousness) connect with the Higher Self (Universal Consciousness). 

~ The wonder and poetry of the hymns of the Rig Veda are unlike any commandments or cut-and-dried narratives; instead, they are a fascinating poetic testament of a people's collective reaction to the wonder and awe of existence. A people of vigorous and childlike imagination (but deepened and widened by the calm of meditation/introspection) awakened at the very dawn of civilization to a sense of the inexhaustible mystery that is implicit in Life. Theirs was a simple 'way of life' that held all forms of life sacred, attributed divinity to every element and force of Nature ~ but it was a cohesive and joyous one, in which there was trust in god, in which the sense of mystery only gave enchantment to life, without weighing it down with the myriad bafflement of a rigorous faith and mechanical ritualism. It was an unburdened 'way of life' that celebrated diversity - of the objective universe. Keener spiritual longing shifts the emphasis from the wonder of the outside universe to the significance of the self within - to explore the infinite depths of the Soul (atman or Higher Self) in which the central principle of creation is reflected. ~ The early authors were childlike in their reaction, less brooding, and (hence) fascinated by what they beheld (~ perhaps they also sought to understand it through their own hopes and day-to-day lives). But as when children grow they gather an increasing awareness of their selves, the later authors sought more and more a centre of reference in their own consciousness, a subjective counterpart to the objective majesty that had so long held them enthralled in awe, an answer in their own being to the cosmic mysteries of the visible or manifest universe. 

Maybe: only the Almighty (Mahat or Ishvari, Para Brahmn or 'Brahma-putri') is familiar with the cosmic architecture - about the three cosmic phenomenon of 'Creation-Maintenance-Dissolution' (~ the three aspects of the impersonal unmanifested Absolute OM/Brahmn as the impersonal, unmanifested Cosmic Trimurti - 'Brahma-Vishnu-Shiva'). ~ And so, the Almighty (Mahat or Ishvari, Para Brahmn or 'Brahma-putri') as the saguna, manifested Trimurti - 'Sarasvati-Lakshmi-Parvati' is also aware of the growth and evolution of the manifest cosmos, and so on. 

~ If we can understand this, we will also comprehend: what the impersonal, unmanifested'Narayana' is all about, and what the saguna, manifested 'Narayani' indicates. ... And then, we can also gain clarity about which of them is indicated in the 'Dasavatara' - the ten principal manifestations - to maintain and stabilize the universe + to protect and preserve humanity from negativism (~ be they entities or be they negativism or ignorance of the mind) - yuge-yuge, yug/era after yug/era - whenever and wherever the latter becomes a bane ~ as per the promised: || yada yada hi dharmasya glanir bhavati bharata abhyutthanam adharmasya tadatmanam srjamy aham- BG IV-7 || ~ Whenever and wherever there is an alarming decline or discrepancy in dharmicprinciples (for the greater good, and/or for humanity/society/civilization to flourish - progress and prosper); or when such an alarming decline is perceived or becomes a bane; O Bharata (addressing Arjun, who belonged to the Puru-vansh or Bharat-vansh lineage/clan - for Bharatas referlink1), only then, I, manifest Myself. | The purpose is to preserve and protect ~ to provide guidance + to renew/rekindle/re-energize/revive/regenerate/reinvigorate/revitalize/rejuvenate - dharmic principles (positive and tangible action - steadfast karm yog - individually and collectively - for the larger good) ~ for the collective benefit of mankind/humanity ~ to help create and sustain a progressive, prosperous, inclusive and vibrant society/civilization ('dharma-samsthapanarthaya sambhavami yuge yuge'). | Karma is not comeuppance or retribution, but an opportunity for redemption. ~ Krishn indicates that as the Supreme Judge he delivers his judgment on prarabdha karma (negative karma) - maybe during his presence amongst humans - and/or provides an opportunity for redemption. 

The two Indus "Yogi Seals" depict a deity with three faces, seated in yogic position on a throne, wearing bangles on both arms and an elaborate headdress (made of bullhorns). Various Indus glyphs appear on either side of the headdress. The glyphs show a fish (matsya - the first avatar/manifestation) and "V" shaped alphabets. | The three faces = indicative of the concept of the saguna, manifested Trimurti - 'Sarasvati-Lakshmi-Parvati' - also known as: Mahat, Ishvari or Brahm-putri + the patron figure or deity of the ancient Rig Vedic people and of the Indus-SarasvatI Civilization (also known as "Aryavarsha" - abode or land inhabited by the Arya people. | Arya = noble or noble-natured, it is a reference to a people and a culture/civilization; a people who followed a pattern of life based on noble values and ideals. It was not a homogeneous or monolithic culture, though... and yet, there were commonalities in the 'way of life'. Varsha = continent, in Sanskrit. | Dharma (here it means: justice) is generally symbolized in Sanaatan Dharmic thought by the bull, vrishabha. ~ Thus, the Almighty is also known as Vrishaakritih (embodiment or personification of Dharma) or Vrishaparvaa and Dharmadhyaksha - Lord of Dharma (Supreme Judge). ~ And so, the illustrious God of gods is called Vṛṣabha (the Great Bull). | The 'thousand-horned great bull with a hundred heads' does not refer to any creature. It is a metaphor or imagery for Supreme Judge (Dharmadhyaksha). | One of the Indus "Yogi Seals" has a branch with three prongs or peepal leaves emerging from the center and adorning the horned headdress. ~ BG 10.26: || aśvatthaḥ sarva-vṛkṣāṇāḿ || ~ "among trees, I am the peepal." (ashvattha) - fig tree (it can mean: banyan tree as well as the Peepal/aśvatthaḥ - the Bodhi Tree or Transpersonal World Tree, or maybe both). ~ The Parijaat tree (Kalpataru or Kalpavrisha - wish-bearing tree) is very likely the peepal. It is associated with heaven (svargaloka); parts of the ancient Himalayan kingdom too can be associated with svarga on earth. ... Alternatively, Parijaat could be a reference to the Magnolia champaca (Michelia Champaca, also known as "golden champaca" or "red champaca"), commonly called yellow jade orchid tree, a large evergreen tree best known for its fragrant yellow or white (various shades of peach-cream) flowers. Golden Champa or Yellow Champak - a beautiful, delightfully scented cream-yellow flower. ~ The species epithet, champaca, comes from the Sanskrit word campaka. (The genus Michelia is very closely related to subgenus Yulaniaof genus Magnolia.) | The other alternative for Parijaat is Shiuli (Nyctanthes arbor-tristis) - not to be confused for Juthika (Jasminum auriculatum/molle). | ~ In the Rig Vedic times, the SarasvatI was a mighty river flowing from the mountains to the sea (giribhyah asamudrat). ~ The abundance and tremendous force of its water had an enchanting impact on the minds of the poets who repeatedly described it as: 'abounding in waters' - maho-arnah;'flowing rapidly' - pra-sasre;'moving faultlessly' - akuvari;'possessing unlimited strength' - yasyah amah ananto;'roaring' - charati roruvat,and'fierce' - ghora. ~ Thus, the realistic picture in the Rig Veda is that of a mighty and highly glorified river named SarasvatI descending from the Himalayas. ... The river disappeared at a place called Vinasana (literally 'disappearance'), though many believe it still flows below the ground.| Here is Tagore's 'Ogo Nadi Apon Bege': link. ~ 'Ogo Nadi apon bege pagal paraa ('flowing rapidly' - pra-sasre; 'moving faultlessly' - akuvari) path-e path-e bahir hoye apon haara...' (Refer the relevant passages on "Sada-Shiva" and "Bhola Nath".) |~ Goddess Sarasvati is said to have invented Sanskrit, known as the mother of all languages, of scriptures and scholarship.The Goddess is also revered as the mother of the Vedas and as the mother of the Indian Civilization, i.e. the Indus-Sarasvati Civilization or "Aryavarsha" (~ abode of the Arya people; land of the noble ones; Arya = noble, noble-natured or people who followed a pattern of life based on noble values and ideals. Varsha = continent, in Sanskrit). | Goddess Sarasvati is also the eternal divine person/entity (Absolute or Eternal Truth - Sat/Satya). She is Purusha-uttama - the greatest of all beings - the Almighty (Brahm-putri, Para Brahmn, Mahat or Ishvari). She is Sanaatan Purusha - the eternal divine person/entity. ... Sanaatan Dharma (the eternal [sanaatan] path or 'way of life' [dharma] emanates from Her. Arya Dharma and Sanaatan Dharma are non-different. |'Taba Charana Nimney': link(~ 'Arja garima keerti-kahini mugdho jagatey bohiya, hanshichhe dib balika, kanthhe bijoy malika...') | Arja = Arya. Garima = grace, dignity. Keerti-kahini = great, glorious and inspirational deeds. Dib = divya, divine).|Goddess SarasvatI is 'Destiny' and 'Providence' Herself. [And so, destiny and Providence are non-different.] ~ Providence: The care, guardianship, and guidance exercised by the Almighty; divine direction. Providence is God's fore-knowledge, beneficent care, and governance over the universe at large and human affairs in particular. The word derives from the Latin providentia,'foresight'.

BG 10.35: || māsānāḿ mārga-śīrṣo 'hamṛtūnāḿ kusumākaraḥ|| ~ "Of months I am Mārgaśīrṣa [November-December], and of seasons I am spring."|Mrigashīrsha: Sanskrit mṛgaśiras (also spelled Mārgaśīrṣa/Mṛgaśira) - the 5th nakṣatra or *lunar mansion - as used in Vedic astronomy and astrology, is the constellation Orion (also known as Kaalpurush, meaning: Timeless, Eternal or Ancient; kaal or kaalah = time, in Sanskrit). The Rig Veda refers to the Orion Constellation as Mriga/Mṛga (The Deer). ~ The term Mṛgaśira is a composite of two Sanskrit words, mṛgameaning animal (can also mean: deer - symbolizing destiny) and śira meaning head or precisely, the top of the head. [~ The Indus 'Yogi Seal' popularly known as the 'Pasupati Seal' probably has something to do with this.] |The crescent moon affixed to the jata (dredlocks) of Rudra-Siva probably represents *lunar mansion. Thus Rudra-Siva is also known as ChandrachuR or Sasidhar/Shashidhar. The jata (dredlocks) represent the Sivaliks - part of the Himalayan ranges and/or the ancient Himalayan kingdom. The gushing Ganga emerges from these mountains through the snout known as Gomukh. BG 10.31: || srotasām asmi jāhnavī || ~ "and of flowing waters I am the Ganga." [Here, Jahnavi or Ganga could be a reference to ancient India.] The tiger-skin represents Rudra-Siva's valiant nature.The smurf-blue colour - refer 'Meghavarnam'. ~ Our national anthem is 'The Morning Song of India' ~ an ode to that Bhagya Vidhata [ed. Lord of Destiny] - who (in Tagore's own words) "has from age after age held steadfast the reins of India's chariot through rise and fall, through the straight path and the curved." [Here are the complete five stanzas: link. | Goddess Sarasvati is Savitri - the goddess of dawn. Refer the passages on the Gayatri Mantra. | Thus, retrogressive idioms and proverbs involving Sati (feminine of Sat/Satya - the Erernal Truth) and Savitri (the goddess of dawn) is the outcome of the post Gupta era drift and flounder.]

"Aryavarsha" or the Indus-Sarasvati Civilization (Sabhyata) is the only Arya Civilization (~ although some extinct civilizations too may have followed the Arya 'way of life'). All other civilizations, including the celebrated Greek civilization, are either Yavana or Mlechha. |"Yavana" indicates a people who are reasonably cultured, knowledgeable, great builders and architects, and yet... indulge in un-Arya (ignoble) behaviour like slave-taking, buying and selling of humans in markets, plunder and pillage, misbehaviour with women, and so on. |"Mlechcha," on the other hand, implies uncivilized or savage. | The ancient civilizations were understood as Arya, Mlechcha and Yavana. | Alexander was a Yavana.] 

The SarasvatI is (also) called "she with seven sisters" (saptasvasā) - Uccaiḥśravā or Uchchaihshravas. ~ The 'Sapta Sindhu' ("seven rivers" - Vedic Sapta Sindhavaḥ; "Sindhu" means river, stream or ocean in Sanskrit) - refers to the rivers SuturI (Sutlej), VipASa (Beas), AsiknI (Chenab), ParuSNI (Ravi), VitastA (Jhelum), Sindhu (Indus) andprobably KubhA. |"Hindu" is simply a variation of "Sindhu" (River Indus) - courtesy the ancient Persians. | Sapta-Sindhu (Vedic Sapta Sindhavaḥ) became Hapta-Handu (Persian) - finally culminating in the word "Hindu". ~ The Avesta-speakers referred to Sapta Sindhavaḥ as Hapta-HAndu. ~ In Old Persian, the 'S' for Sindhu/Sindhavaḥ (River Indus) becomes 'H' (due to a lack of phonetics). Thus, Sapta Sindhu or Sapta Sindhavaḥ becomes Hapta Handu... which in turn gave way to the word "Hindu". ~ And so, "Hindu" is not the name of any "religion" or even a set of religious beliefs whatsoever... it was simply a label for a specific landmass. |"Persia" very likely evolved from "Parshva" (meaning: 'next door', 'neighbouring' or 'nearby'). The Rig Vedic Parsus or Parsavas has been anglicized to Persians. So, maybe, the ancient Indus people (the Arya-s) called the people of the first/neighbouring port by the Sanskrit word "Parshva". | Thus, courtesy the ancient Persians... to the world beyond, the vast areas around the Indus-SarasvatI rivers and its culture came to be known as the area of "Hindus" (thus the name "Hindustan" which literally means the land of "Hindus". Stan = land or place in Persian. Similar to Sthan in Sanskrit. ~ The similarity between "Stan" and "Sthan" is again due to theancient Avestan Persian-Sanskrit connection which go back a long way.) ~ This nomenclature stuck and became particularly prevalent after the arrival of the Mughals. The Mughals (based on the earlier Persian terminology) used the term "Hindu" to refer to the original inhabitants of the land and this label became the way to distinguish the indigenous/ancient culture from theirs. | When the Greeks first reached the river plains of the Punjab, they borrowed the name of the region (Hindu) from the Persians and simply modified it to "Indós". "Indós" later morphed into "Indus" in Latin - by which name the river (Sindhu) is still known in the West. [~ The ancient Greeks referred to the ancient Indians as Indói, meaning: the people of the Indus.] The Romans began to call the whole landmass after this river and thus the name "India" came to stay ~ which has been the form used by Europeans over the ages. ~ Thus, "India" too is derived from the mighty River Indus, perhaps the largest of all rivers in the world after the Nile (Sanskrit: Nilah or Neel).  | BG 10.24: || sarasam asmi sagarah || ~ "and of bodies of water I am the ocean." ~ It is a reference to the River Indus. Sarasam also indicates saras - meaning: gracefully flowing. Saras or Sarasa means spring, pool or fountain. Saras or Sarasa can also indicate SarasvatI. ~ The Sarasvati river is an important river goddess in the Rig Veda. The Sanskrit name means, "having many pools" (also refer Ketaksha and Pushkara). ~ The Sanskrit name for the River Indus is Sindhu. "Sindhu" means river, stream or ocean in Sanskrit. ~ If we understand this verse, we can also comprehend why this sabhyata is called Indus-Sarasvati Civilization.]

~ The greatness of the Indus-Sarasvati Civilization can be attributed to ancient Indian genius (~ and trade was the driving force/factor.) ... Excavations (though a lot remains to be excavated) have uncovered a civilization so vast in its extent that at its peak it is estimated to have encompassed a staggering 1.5 million sq km - an area larger than Western Europe. In size, it dwarfed contemporary civilizations in the Nile Valley in Egypt and in the Tigris and Euphrates valleys in Sumer (Sumerian Civilization - modern Iraq). | Goddess Sarasvati is a prominent figure in Buddhist iconography. She is also worshiped in Indonesia and Japan. So whether the Indus-SarasvatI Civilization stretched up to the Far East or not ~ my guess is as good as yours. | The 'Harappan' civilization is a phase (marked by the rise, intensification, diversification and subsequent evolution of an urban process) within the much earlier, more extensive and more durable Vedic Civilization that still continues. ~ Across this wide swathe of land, there was no cultural homogeneity or monolithicism, whatsoever. There was a diverse mix of population too... and so, people of varied physical appearances peopled this civilization. And yet, an underlying cultural affinity existed - a shared 'way of life', history, experience, knowledge, know-how, trade, and so on. ~ Thus, our unity in diversity go back a long way. |The emphasis has been on acceptance and assimilation. ... There has never been any 'Aryan Invasion' whatsoever. The so-called 'Aryan blitzkrieg' or 'Aryan Invasion theory' is fictitious. It never happened. ~ When the British archaeologist (Wheeler) discovered a dozen skeletons, he propounded a theory about the final massacre by 'marauding invaders' that put an end to the Indus civilization. [~ This civilization is perennial and eternal - sanaatan; it can evolve, but not end.] ~ When an Indian scholar told him of Hariyuppa (or "Hariyupiyah") mentioned in the Rig Veda, he took it to mean Harappa. ~ And since a fort was known as pur, and Indra (possibly a 'title' for the king/ruler/chief of the ancient 'Deva' people) was known as Purandhara or destroyer of forts, it all fitted neatly. After all, weren't the Indus cities among the most fortified? ~ Archaeologists are known to stumble, but the kind of knocking that the 'Aryan Invasion theory' has taken has few parallels. There are still many misconceptions about this culture... that has resulted from the theoretical and cultural biases of the earliest excavators. | As for Dravida: "Dramila" is believed to be the root of the word "Dravida" by some scholars. "Dramila" means, "running away" or "escaping". It is possible that this word was used (by our ancients) to refer to the people who escaped the great deluge that swallowed up Dvarka (Dvaravati). Later, these displaced people settled down in other parts. ~ And, perhaps with the passage of time, this word - Dramila - underwent certain changes, and gave rise to a new word, "Dravida". ~ It is not indicative of "race". The Indian Civilization (the Indus-Sarasvati Civilization) is 'Aryavarsha' (~ abode of the Arya people; land of the noble ones; Arya = noble or noble-natured; a people who followed a pattern of life based on noble values and ideals. Varsha = continent, in Sanskrit)

~ Rabindra Sangeet enjoys the blissful alliance of its lyrics along with music. |'Ayi Bhuban Mano Mohini': link. | ~ This song is Tagore's celebration of nature during springtime. ... The sublime verses also celebrate Goddess Sarasvati ('Destiny' and 'Providence'), Goddess Lakshmi (also symbolizing 'Good fortune') and Goddess Parvati (popularly known as Goddess Durga - the Invincible) as Rudra-Siva. ~ This song should alsohelp us understand just who the Mohini-avatar is. | Mohini = rare, uncommon. ~ The Krishn-avatar, a male, is also known as "Mohan". Therefore, "Mohini" is simply the feminine of "Mohan"... and is indicative of a female. The 'Sudarshan Chakra' - the combination of Ajna chakra (the 6th chakra) and Sahasrara (the 7th chakra or crown chakra - the highest chakra) is associated with this avatar.

'Neelsindhujaladhautacharantal, anilbikampita-shyamal-aanchal (~ this should explain Krishna as Hari, and Krishn's depiction wrapped in cool cyan - bluish green), ambarchumbitabhalhimachal (the Himalayas), shubhratushaarkiritini'(snow-white crown or headgear).~ BG 10.25: || sthāvarāṇāḿ himālayaḥ || ~ "and of immovable things I am the Himalayas." ~ This could be a reference to the ancient Himalayan kingdom and/or the Himalayan ranges (shubhratushaarkiritini) - indicative of:personification of the Himalayas (thus Goddess Parvati is also known as 'Himalaya-putri'). | Putri = embodiment, personification or manifestation. ~ However, since Goddess Parvati's father, Himavat (also known as Himavant) - the ruler of the Himalaya kingdom of ancient India is also considered as the personification of the Himalayan Mountains, here 'putri' can also mean daughter.| The saguna, saakarTrimurti of 'Sarasvati-Lakshmi-Parvati' is non-different. (Refer the relevant passages). The impersonal (nirguna - without qualities), unmanifested (avyaktah, niraakar - without form) cosmic Trimurti - 'Brahma-Vishnu-Shiva' - is indicative of the Absolute OM/Brahmn - Cosmic Light or Light Divine ~ the impersonal 'Brahm-jyotih' or 'Aadi-Shakti' - Primal Creative Energy. ~ Rather 'Brahma-Vishnu-Shiva' is indicative of the three aspects of the cosmic phenomenon of 'Creation-Maintenance-Dissolution'. | Rudra-Siva's depiction is allegorical, but the face is feminine (~ in other words: the facial features belong to a female). BG 10.23: || rudranam sankaras casmi || ~ "Of all the Rudras I am Sankara" [Rudra-Śiva] ~ There are eleven Rudras, of whom Rudra-Siva, is preeminent. | Trishul could be a reference to a group of three Himalayan mountain peaks. Or it could be an allegory for the three rivers: Ganga, Yamuna and the mythic Sarasvati. Or both. [The confluence of the Ganga, Yamuna and the Sarasvati is known as Triveni Sangam or Prayag. | Triveni and Trishul; tri = three. ... While sangam is a popular word for a confluence of rivers, this particular confluence was called Sangayam, to represent the meeting of Sarasvati (sa), Ganga (ga) and Yamuna (yam). Sangayam could mean, to flow together. | For Neelkanth (the allegorical 'blue-throated one' - refer relevant passages).] 

'Pratham prabhat uday taba gaganey, (the sun rises in the east; the sun is Pratyaksh-Brahmn [refer the passages on the Gayatri Mantra and BG 10.21: || jyotisam ravir amsuman || ~ "of radiance I am the radiant sun" (ravir amsuman) - i.e. personification/manifestation or embodiment [putri] of the sun, a reference to goddess Sarasvati; She is Savitri = the goddess of dawn) | Pratham pracharita taba banbhabhaney Gyanadharma (the enlightened 'way of life' - Arya Dharma or Sanaatan Dharma) koto Kabyakahini' (~ think of Adikavi - Maharshi Valmiki and Maharshi Veda Vyas; due to the goddess' blessings the former overcame his prarabda karma (negative karma) and composed the Ramayana ('The Exertions of Sri Ram'), while the latter was assisted by the Goddess Herself [Sarasvati and Sri Ganesh are non-different] to compile his magnum opus - the Mahabharata ('The Great History of the Bharatas' - a reference to the Purus or Puruvansh - descendents of Raja Yayati's youngest-born, Puru). ~ Valmiki (väl-mē′kē) was a niṣāda (nishada) or vyadh (forest-dwelling hunter-gather) who also indulged in negative activities. His original name was Ratnakara. Valmiki means: 'one who sits in an anthill'. Maybe, it is indicative of his attaining nirvana; he was self-realized and did not have any attachment to sense objects. |'Chirakalyanamayi tumi dhanya, desh-bideshe bitorichho anno (indicative of Goddess Lakshmi) --jahnabi-jamuna bigalita karuna punyapijushstanyabahini' (~ the bull is a familiar motif in the Indus seals. Also, rivers and cows are often poetically correlated in the Rig Veda).

Bharatavarsha means: the continent (Sanskrit: continent = 'varsha') that is dedicated (Sanskrit: dedicated = 'rata') to light, wisdom (Sanskrit: wisdom = 'bha'). ~ In other words: the light of wisdom or the wisdom of knowledge - enlightenment (through inner perfection - by the 'awakening' of the latent spiritual energy - kundalini - lying dormant at the base of the spine). ~ Bharatavarsha or Bharatadesam also means, "cherished land". ~ Yet another name for ancient India is  Jambudveepa or Jambadveepa. [Jambu or Jamba = Indian blackberry.] So, maybe, there was an abundance of this tree ~ and hence the name. Thus, Jambudveepa = island of the Jambu or Jambul (Indian blackberry) trees. Or perhaps, ancient India was shaped like an Indian blackberry. 

…………………………………………………………..


BG 10.28: || dhenūnām asmi kāmadhuk || ~ "among cows I am the surabhi" (also known as kamadhenu - the "wish-fulfilling cow" ~ possibly a metaphorfor prosperity, luck, etc.) |Rivers and cows are often poetically correlated in the Rig Veda.

~ Devi Sarasvati is Varadey Kaamarupinee (~ the fulfiller of wishes). In other words: Destiny or 'Lady Luck'. (Kaamarupinee = kamadhenu).

~ From what we can gather, Lord Krishn was tall and handsome - possessing soft features, pleasant looks and an easy charm, but his visual depiction is rather feminine. Maybe it is symbolic. Perhaps to indicate: it is Goddess Sarasvati (Destiny) as Lord Krishn - at yet another crucial turn of our history. ~ Soul or spirit is energy; it has no gender or form. | Our national anthem too indicates that Goddess Sarasvati and Lord Krishn are non-different. |The trinity or trimurti of Sarasvati (also symbolizing Destiny, 'Lady luck'), Lakshmi (also symbolizing Good fortune) and Parvati (Goddess Durga - symbolizing invincibility) are non-different. Refer the relevant passages +link1.] |If we understand the concept of the syncretic form - indicative of the transcendence of both (the Gemini aspect) ~ we will also understand what the impersonal, unmanifested cosmic 'Shiva-Brahma-Vishnu' and the manifested, saguna 'Parvati-Sarasvati-Lakshmi' indicates.

~ The allegoric Divine Dance (refer the earlier passages) probably has come to be given a literal connotation ~ as 'Raas-leela'. Perhaps as a result of later-day stage plays, iconography, poetry, verses and the like. | Krishn is associated with Prachya - Eastern Country (Praesii or Prasioi to the Greeks - refer link1), not Madhyadesa (Middle Country). Mathura (Megasthenes' Methora) too is part of Eastern Country. Also, he was a Shurasena Yadu (Megasthenes' Sourasenoi). ... Eastern Country (Praesii or Prasioi to the Greeks) was also referred to as Magadha. ~ Jarasandh, Chanakya, the Mauryas, the Nandas and later the Guptas were associated with thisMagadha - the one on the western parts of ancient India. ... After the great dharma-yuddha (battle of ideas, principles, vision, inclusivity and progress - for the future of humanity, for a prosperous and vibrant society to emerge) - this Magadha became the foremost of ancient kingdoms with the new capital Pataliputra, a port city on the banks of the Ganges (~ this 'Ganges' could be a reference to ancient India). BG 10.31: || srotasām asmi jāhnavī || ~ "and of flowing waters I am the Ganga." [Here, 'Ganga' is a reference to India.] Did Lothal have anything to do with the port city? ~ The Nandas and Mauryas ruled this kingdom. And even the Guptas. ~ The Mauryas built the celebrated Mauryan Empire that spanned far and wide. ~ Lord Krishn founded this city of Pataliputra (Palibothra or Palimbothra to the Greeks) - 138 generations before the reign of Chandragupta Maurya. || Krishn was sent away to study at Maharshi Sandeepani and Garga Muni’s ashram at a very young age. Here he would have been put through a rigorous training regimen, spending his time reading a variety of subjects. (Ashrams or gurukul-s were situated in isolated/remote places and the students followed a disciplined life.) So, it is quite unlikely that Krishn would have been able to spend his time, especially his teenage years, in the company of milkmaids (including Radha) or by playing with village boys (Sudama included). Besides, he was not part of Madhyadesha or Middle Country region of the Mahabharata times. |"Radha" - perhaps was originally meant to be a metaphorfor Prakriti (nature during springtime). ~ Later translators probably took it in the literal sense. | Rivers and cows are often poetically correlated in the Rig Veda. (~ Cows emerging out of mountains - is a reference to various rivers; in the Arya 'way of life' rivers and water-bodies were not polluted. ~ This should alsohelp us understand what 'cows' are associated with Krishn. | Gopa = ruler, king or monarch. BG 10.27: || narāṇāḿ ca narādhipam || ~ "and among humans I am the monarch" (Cakravartin). | Also, there was a large number of unnatural humans. Bheeshma, Dronacharya, Dhritarashtra, Pandu and Vidur, Karna, the Kauravas and the Pandavas, Draupadi and her brother, Drishtadumna, Ghatotkach, Draupadi's five sons, etc - were all 'born' or begotten through various medical procedures (including advanced genetic engineering and cloning technology). Therefore, it is quite unlikely that a large number of milkmaids existed. | It is possible, though, that "Gopa" (meaning: king, ruler or monarch) was also originally an allegory - indicative of "heavenly shepherd" or shepherd to his flock (humanity). ~ Later, this too may have been mis-interpreted and taken literally. | Besides, Jambavan was part of Treta. So Krishna could not have married Jambavani in Dvapar. ~ As for his supposed 16,108 'wives' or even 700,000 'wives' and 180,000 'sons': these cannot be taken at face value. These figures (very likely) came about courtesy the many cultic groups and movements that came up in his name ~ especially the 'Bhakti Movement'. Members of this movement considered themselves "married" to Sri Krishn. Yes, even the men. | ... The 'Bhakti Movement' being a reform movement, it could be that many of these stories were woven in order to mainstream some marginalized groups, such as the 'tritiya prakriti', etc. ~ A multitude of retelling, paintings, poems, songs, music, stage plays et al later... bits and pieces of these have (probably) gradually made their way into the narrative concerning Krishn.

*Blue complexion: Wherever there is the convergence of purity (inner perfection; Sat-cit-ānanda or the inner joy and tranquility - eternal bliss/spiritual ecstasy or true contentment of self-realization) and depth(boundlessness) ~ it produces the colour blue. Meghavarnam. | The water of the seas and the sky - both are blue-hued. ~ And, since the Almighty combines both purity (inner perfection, i.e. lack of delusion due to non-attachment to sense objects + lack of delusion due to the transience of the material world that one inhabits) and depth or boundlessness, the Almighty too is (allegorically) 'blue-hued'. (~ It's a concept - indicative of divine attribute or divinity.) |Blue also stands for: meditation/introspection, peace, tranquility (inner joy of true contentment), depth (boundlessness), stability, trust, loyalty, wisdom, confidence, intelligence, patience, decision-making and dharma (positive, tangible actions for the larger, collective good... leading to a prosperous, progressive and vibrant society.) 


[Note:Puritydoes not refer to chastity or some such. That is mis-translation. ~ The social conditions or world-view prior to the decline of the Gupta era was considerably different.]

'Purity' refers to self-realization or Param-atma (Higher Self) realization. ~ Whosoever achieves self-realization is a pure or perfect person (inner perfection - i.e. one who is truly enlightened; in other words: one who is non-deluded (dhirah or of steady mind) ~ it requires sense control, complete non-attachment to sense objects).

The process of Self-realization is a genuine spiritual transition or spiritual awakening ~ wherein humans reach a higher level of existence, by moving out of his or her inferior manas (lower mind or lower self) and into the superior manas (higher mind or Higher Self). | This can be achieved, for example, by working towards a higher cause - the greater, collective good and struggle (continuous effort) - towards it without being affected by lack of instant results or outcome. [Equanimity = to be unaffected by the transience of things, events, etc. E.g. to not feel exalted by praise, to not be deterred by barbs. To not be fickle-minded. To not give up. To not lose hope.] ~ By (symbolically) moving out of his or her lower mind or lower self (mere Self or jiva-atma) and into the higher mind or Higher Self (Atman or Supersoul) ~ one can (thus) become part of a higher destiny.

Self-realization is therefore the pathway or route to inner perfection ~ one's progress as a human being... leading to Supreme Enlightenment.

~ It requires the awakening of the spiritual energy - kundalini (a latent energy that lies dormant in the spine). Upon awakening, it rises in a sensation akin to a slithering reptile, up the spinal column (Meru-danda, also represented by the [allegoric] Mt Meru [Mandar Parvat] in the story. | BG 10.23:|| meruh sikharinam aham || ~ "and of mountains I am Meru." (~ Here Mt Meru is also an allegory for Sahasrara Chakra - the 7th chakra, also known as the crown chakra - the highest chakra). |BG 10.28: || sarpāṇām asmi vāsukiḥ || ~ "and of serpents I am Vāsuki."~ Here Vasuki is an allegory for the latent spiritual energy - kundalini - that lies dormant at the base of the spine. | If we look at the human brain: there is the left hemisphere (side 1) and the right hemisphere (side 2) ~ the area in the middle is (allegorically) occupied by a 'serpent'. ~ Therefore, in a manner of speaking, we can say: kundalini is 'serpent power'. | Kunda = "to coil or to spiral". |The power of kundalini can be allegorically termed as 'serpent power'. ~ It may be that our ancients termed the awakening/rousing of the kundalini power as 'a serpent's crown jewel' or 'the priceless jewel found inside the head of serpents'. ~ 'Coz in the final state of the Kundalini 'Fire'- when kundalini passes through the top of the head, at the fontanel area, when the kundalini reaches the Sahasrara (the 7th chakra or crown chakra - the highest chakra) it (allegorically) shines forth like a diamond disc/chakra. | If we can understand this, we can also comprehend what Tagore brilliantly conveyed through the sublime verses of 'Nirjarer Swapnabhango' ('Awakening/Rousing of the Fountain'). ~ Fountain = spring, sarasa. | Note how brilliantly he has combined Goddess Sarasvati and kundalini ~ as if two rivers rushed to greet each other; and as they met, sprays of water rose high in the air - and then the waters of the two 'rivers' (mere Self and Higher Self) joined together and in their immensity flowed as one single river. To Tagore, time moves in slow, majestic waves, rising up and sinking down again into the sea/ocean.

~ In the sacrum bone (a large, triangular bone) at the base of the spine there exists a subtle and dormant coil of spiritual energy known as the kundalini. (Goddess Adi Shakti is associated with Kundalini). ~ The process of spiritual awakening (Enlightenment, or in other words, Self-realization) involves the gentle awakening/rousing of this living and conscious energy, so that it pervades an individual's entire being. Once this occurs, a person or individual is no longer disconnected from the universe around him or her - i.e. he or she is no longer confined inside his or her own head (courtesy: inflated ego, arrogance, confusion, delusion, selfish considerations, vainglory, etc) - but becomes a connected part of the greater cosmos (~ the mind is lit up, in a manner of speaking; in other words: the metaphoric dimaag ki batti is lit up - possibly depicted by the "halo" - symbolizing enlightenment or complete wisdom); it brings about self-knowledge (atma-vidya - self-reflection or knowledge of the Self) and inner joy or contentment - leading to Sat-cit-ānanda, the eternal bliss or spiritual ecstasy (total contentment) of "self-realization". 

Sat-cit-ananda: Satdescribes an essence that is pure (perfect or inner perfection - i.e. non-deluded by the transient nature of the material or manifest world due to non-attachment to sense objects) and timeless (eternal - non-evanescent or non-transient); citis consciousness (~ the complete awakening of the spiritual energy, kundalini - resulting in awareness, sentience - self-reflection, cognizance, insight and accurate interpretation - perception and internal wisdom); ananda is absolute bliss or spiritual ecstasy/true contentment - inner joy, peace and tranquility of self-realization. |Sat-cit-ananda essentially means to connect or commune with the Higher Self (sat). ~ The complete awakening of the spiritual energy - kundalini - unites the individual consciousness (mere Self) with the Universal Consciousness (Higher Self) ~ the jiva-atma (mere Self) or finite to the Atman or Infinite. This results in sat-cit-ananda - the eternal bliss or spiritual ecstasy (inner joy and tranquility or true contentment) of self-realization.| ~ One who has experienced Sat-cit-ananda - is a pure or perfect person (inner perfection). ~ Kundalini awakening connects a human (mere Self) to his or her Atman (Supersoul or Higher Self) - which is the source of all things. This Atman is the eternal aspect of an individual's personality; when an individual become totally connected with it, such a person becomes a Buddha (the Enlightened One - the state of complete wisdom - para vidya). ~ Such a person is non-deluded by attachment to sense objects or by the transient nature of the material or manifest world that he or she inhabits; such a person gains or is filled with eternal (pure/perfect) or timeless (non-transient) knowledge - para vidya. [~ Also refer to the passages on kundalini.]

BG 10.22: || indriyanam manas casmi bhutanam asmi cetana || ~ "Of the senses (indriyanam) I am the mind (manas); and in living beings (bhutanam) I am the living force (cit or consciousness - sentience)" |If we can understand this, we will also understand what has been meant by Karna's 'chariot wheel sank deep into the ground'. [Literally: Karna = ears. Kundal = ear-ring; though it is probably derived from "kundalini" (refer the relevant passages on Kundalini and Sahasrara or crown chakra).] | As per the narrative, Karna's 'chariot wheel sank deep into the ground' at a crucial time; he was, thus, unable to recollect the 'mantra'for unleashing certain weaponry (~ this is indicative of cognitive dulling;  the dulling of Karna's memory). ~ Wheel = cakra or chakra, and (very likely) refers to Karna's mind chakra or Manasa Chakra, which is connected with most of the head (especially the brain), is a combination of sensing and intellect. [Maybe, only by weakening of Karna's "kundal"... could this unnatural human, ('son' of Lord Surya, a higher being, and Kunti - begotten through advanced genetic engineering) be rendered inactive; otherwise nothing else could affect him (~ as indicated by the "kavacha" - that was part of his genetic makeup.) ~ Hence, Karna could never have donated either his "kaavacha" or his "kundaal".

Living force (cit - sentience) i.e. cetana or consciousness = life force or vital energy is a reference to sentience. It is also a reference to kundalini energy. | Consciousness and conscience are two different things;consciousness[cit - cetana, life force]is awareness, sentience - self-reflection, cognizance, insight and accurate interpretation... resulting in perception and internal wisdom (insight). It is the ability to feel, think, perceive,comprehend or to experience. It is necessary for deeper insight. | Krishn is referring to the awakening of the kundalini energy - to the ajna chakra (6th chakra) and the Sahasrara (the crown chakra - the 7th chakra) ~ also allegorically represented by the syncretic form of Shiva-Shakti. 'Shiva' represents the 6th chakra or the third eye chakra. 'Shakti' represents the 7th chakra (crown chakra, Sahasrara or the highest chakra ~ depicted with an OM).  [~ Also refer the passages about sat-cit-ananda, kundalini, Sahasrara and the sixth chakra ~ to understand what 'lotus petals open and enlightenment takes place' and 'opening of the third eye' mean.]

The sixth chakra, the third eye chakra, is located in the center of the forehead above the eyebrows. The orientation is self-reflection and the main function is seeing, cognizance and accurate interpretation. In this chakra, an individual aims to open his or her internal wisdom and see at a deeper, more perceptive level. One can do this though the third eye centerwhich is located between the eyes and is the organ for inner perception.Opening the third eye allows an individual to see the big picture, transcend egocentricity, and find the deeper meaning inherent in all things (para vidya). As inner sight develops, illusions disappear, clarity begins, and consciousness (cit) extends yet another step beyond what was available through the lower five chakras alone. As an individual makes his or her way up from the root chakra and out the crown of the head (sahasrara), he or she is gaining insight and delving deeper into his or her internal wisdom. And so, a person's actions become not only significant and purposeful, but also thoughtful. This road to thoughtful action is cognizance and accurate interpretation, insight - it guides an individual towards responding and acting appropriately (~ the path of "dharma" and "nishkam karm-yog"). 

~ Chakras are centers of Prāṇa, life-force, or vital energy. Chakras correspond to vital points in the physical body i.e. major plexuses of arteries, veins and nerves. The 7 Chakras are the energy centers in our body in which energy flows through. ~ Kundaliniis vital for all the 7 Chakras (centers of Prāṇa, life-force, or vital energy) to be fully 'awakened'. ~ And this happens when kundalini reaches the 7thchakra - the Sahasrara or the crown chakra (the highest chakra). ~ This is the chakra of (symbolic) one thousand petals. | Sahasrara is unique in many ways. All other chakras feature (symbolic) upward, pointing lotuses. In the Sahasrara, the lotuses point downward, symbolizing freedom from the mundane (inner perfection - i.e. self-realization - non-deluded by the transient nature of the material or manifest world that one inhabits due to non-attachment to sense objects - the state of complete wisdom/enlightenment - the state of a Buddha), and divine rain from its petals. ~ The Sahasrara (the 7th chakra) was not considered an in-body chakra; (earlier) it was pictured as lying atop the head. The Saharsara is considered beyond most symbolic representations, although the chakra is usually perceived as white. ~ The Sahasrara is considered beyond senses, sense organs, and vital breath (prana or life-force). As such, it is often described without a seed syllable, although some sources depict it with an OM.  |The 7th chakra or Crown Chakra (Sahasrara) is the chakra that integrates all the chakras with their respective qualities. ~ It is the last milestone of the evolution of human awareness. This happens when kundalini passes through the top of the head, at the fontanel area. ~ When the kundalini reaches the Sahasrara, the (symbolic) 'lotus petals' open and enlightenment takes place. ~ The kundalini (then) unites our individual consciousness (mere Self) with the Universal Consciousness (Higher Self) ~ the jiva-atma or finite to the Atman or Infinite. This results in sat-cit-ananda - the eternal bliss or spiritual ecstasy of self-realization. (Aham Brahmasmi - ah-HUM brah-MAHS-mee) | Aham = I, Brahmasmi = am Brahmn. | Meaning: I Am Brahmn. ~ This state is also said to be the state of complete wisdom or enlightenment (~ the state of a Buddha).

~ Tagore's brilliantly composed 'Nirjarer Swapnabhango' ('Awakening or Rousing of the Fountain') - conveying the awakening of his mere Self or individual self's ego-consciousness in the Higher Self; his journey of self-realization - of realizing the Infinite'I' within the finite'I', his journey of transcending the narrow or self-centred philosophy to the philosophy of life, the philosophy of the greater whole (in other words: self-realization) was penned at the age of twenty.

Tagore's path to self-realization was through his considerable oeuvre; as a renaissance poet, thought leader, educationist, humanitarian, and as one of the finest ambassadors of Indian/Eastern thought and philosophy to the rest of the world. |He credits several illuminating experiences from his childhood with shaping his life and establishing its creative direction. When he was learning to read at about the age of six, disconnected words suddenly came together as he encountered the rhyming phrase "jal parey/pata narey" (the water falls/the leaf trembles) in his spelling book. The rhythm of the words connected him for the first time with a harmonious creative dimension. ~ "I was no longer a mere student with his mind muffled by spelling lessons," he writes. "The rhythmic picture of the tremulous leaves beaten by the rain opened before my mind the world which does not merely carry information, but a harmony with my being. The unmeaning fragments lost their individual isolation and my mind reveled in the unity of a vision." ~ Tagore wrote poetry as an eight-year-old. At age sixteen, he released his first substantial poems... and the next sixty-four years were marked by the emergence and torrential flow of creativity in manifold forms. 

~ Swami Vivekananda too imbibed and conveyed this essence succinctly: || Bohu-rupe sammukhe tomar aami, kotha khunjichho Ishvar? Jibe prem kare jei jan, Shei jan shebichhe Ishvar || ~ Service to mankind (not restricted to humanity alone) is service to God. That is true worship.

~ This, to Vivekananda, was his path to self-realization (or Param-atma realization); it was his path to uniting or connecting his individual consciousness or mere Self (the finite 'I') with the Higher Self (the Infinite 'I'). |Vivekananda means: 'one who derives happiness (ananda) through one's consciousness (cit)' or one who has achieved eternal (sat) bliss or spiritual ecstasy of true contentment i.e. inner joy and tranquility of self-realization ~ Sat-cit-ānanda (pronounced as: sach-chid-ānanda). |Satdescribes an essence that is pure (perfect or inner perfection - i.e. non-deluded by the transient nature of the material or manifest world due to non-attachment to sense objects) and timeless (eternal - non-evanescent or non-transient); citis consciousness (~ the complete awakening of the spiritual energy - kundalini - resulting in awareness, sentience - self-reflection, cognizance, insight and accurate interpretation... leading to perception and internal wisdom); ananda is absolute bliss or spiritual ecstasy/true contentment ~ inner joy, peace and tranquility of self-realization. |Sat-cit-ananda essentially means to connect or commune with the Higher Self (Supersoul or Atman). ~ The complete awakening of the spiritual energy - kundalini - unites the individual consciousness (mere Self) with the Universal Consciousness (Higher Self) ~ the jiva-atma (mere Self) or finite to the Atman or Infinite.This results in sat-cit-ananda - the eternal bliss or spiritual ecstasy (inner joy or true contentment) of self-realization.

Only when humans gain enlightenment - the state of complete wisdom, the state of a Buddha, the Sahasrara or the 7th Chakra - the (symbolic) 'thousand-petaled lotus' opens up fully ~ symbolizing that the kundalini power has been fully awakened

BG 10.33: || akṣarāṇām a-kāro 'smi || ~ "Of letters I am the letter 'A'."| Krishn is also referring to kundalini.

~ The sound 'A' is the foremost of the sounds. All the alphabets begin with the letter 'A', thus is number 1. Before number one it can only be zero (shunya). ~ Zero (shunya) is the potential Creation, the Cosmic Egg, which would manifest in due course of time, and Fire (Cosmic Fire/Light Divine/Divine Effulgence or the impersonal, unmanifested'Brahm-jyotih' / 'Aadi Shakti' - Primal Creative Energy) is the basis for such manifestation. | All the planes of existence are the result of the work of Agni (Cosmic Light or Light Divine - the impersonal, unmanifested Absolute OM). Agni transforms; transforms that which is subtle to gross and also transforms the gross to subtle. In the beginning it is from subtle to gross and later from gross to subtle. The evolution and involution is the work of Agni. ~ The whole creation-related work commences from Agni, and Agni is the one who emerges from the unfamiliar to the known as the Cosmic Bang - indicative of the commencement of the cosmic phenomenon of "Creation". ~ Thus, it is probably said: Brahma emerged from the Cosmic Egg due to the Cosmic Bang. | The dynamism in us is also Fire. ~ The Kundalini 'Fire' causes enlightenment of the brain cells. But enflaming the Kundalini 'Fire' requires service to the fellow beings, to the society (steadfast, selfless/nishkam service or action... that contributes towards a better society.) One has to dedicate oneself to nishkam karm - without which the Kundalini 'Fire' is not ignited. |Agni: exists as Cosmic Fire, Solar Fire and as Frictional Fire. |In the sacrum bone (a large, triangular bone) at the base of the spine there exists a subtle and dormant coil of spiritual energy known as the kundalini.| The Kundalini Fire is Frictional Fire, when it is below the diaphragm. When it is above the diaphragm, it is already Solar Fire, and when it reaches the brain, it is Electric Fire (brilliant white). As one progresses regularly (in nishkam karm), the brilliance of the 'Golden disc' (Solar Fire) grows. Just as the morning Sun who is Golden in colour grows to brilliant white, the 'Golden disc/chakra' visualized at the eyebrow centre (ajna chakra - the 6th chakra) rises to Ajnea center/chakra and shines forth like a diamond disc/chakra. ... This is the final state of the Kundalini 'Fire'. ~ When this 'chakra' opens, it is deemed as the opening of the (symbolic) Third Eye.

This phenomenon is perhaps also indicated by the syncretic form of Shiva and Shakti. ~ The Shiva and the Shakti join within Sahasrara (the crown chakra or 7th chakra - the highest chakra) to create brahma-ranhdra, the transcendence of both. ~ Within this chakra, the individual personality dissolves into the essence of the all (~ i.e. the realization of the Infinite'I' within the finite'I'; the union of the jiva-atma or mere Self (individual consciousness) with the Universal Consciousness - Atman or Higher Self.)

The third-eye chakra: This is where the state of thoughtless (tranquil, non-deluded) awareness or Nirvikalpa Samadhi happens. ~ In this state one can actually feel the beautiful Silence, the Stillness, which is at the heart of creation. The primary quality of this chakra is forgiveness and magnanimity; high-mindedness, nobility of spirit: the ability to rise above selfish considerations. There is freedom from inflated ego, hubris, arrogance, contempt, and the like. 

~ If we can understand this, we can also understand why Rudra-Siva is also known as 'Sada-Shiva' and 'Bhola Nath'. ~ "Shiva" means: the kindly, auspicious one, one who is eternally pure. Pure = perfect person i.e. inner perfection - one who has achieved sense control, is non-selfish (nishkam) or non-deluded by transient aspects, including the transient nature of the material world. | Rudra-Siva's state is eternal perfection ('Sada-Shiva') and eternal tranquility (sat-cit-ananda). [Sada = always, constant, eternal.] Rudra-Siva possesses the ability to rise above selfish (sakama) considerations. ~ The sobrequets, 'Sada-Siva' and 'Bhola Nath' indicates all of this. | Bhola = non-selfish or nishkam + dhirah - one who is non-deluded by transient aspects and is not attached to sense objects - the state of a Buddha (the Enlightened One). Nath = monarch or guardian. | Rudra-Siva is non-deluded and possesses complete sense control, and hence is the foremost of karm-yogi-s (~ not to be misconstrued for renunciation).

If we can comprehend this, we can also understand what 'path-e path-e bahir hoye apan haara...' or 'Aakash bojhe ananda taar, bojhe nishar nirab tara'- in Tagore's 'Ogo Nadi Apon Bege'(link) means. [~ Here tara (star) is a reference to the Pole Star or Lode Star (Dhruva Tara or Shuktara - the Morning Star. Also known as the Guiding star). ~ Our national anthem is 'The Morning Song of India' ~ an ode to that Bhagya Vidhata [ed. Lord of Destiny] - who (in Tagore's own words) "has from age after age held steadfast the reins of India's chariot through rise and fall, through the straight path and the curved." [Here are the complete five stanzas: link. |The Hindu and Buddhist alike regard Mt Meru (the central 'mountain' of the world) as the location of the fabled Buddhist land or mythical kingdom of Shambhala. [Mt Meru: is taken as the true centre of the planet and the world's spiritual powerhouse; it is the heartbeat of whole universe, the base of spiritual consciousness, heart of divinity; it is the center of the cosmos. Its summit is believed to align to the wheeling constellation of Ursa Major, the Seven Stars that circle the Pole.] |BG 10.23: || meruh sikharinam aham || ~ "and of mountains I am Meru." ~ Mt. Meru is very likely an allegorical mountain. The Dasavatara depicts Sri Vishnu (i.e. the stabilizing/preserving/maintainer aspectof the impersonal Absolute OM/Brahmn) as supporting Mt. Meru ~ as the Kurma Avatar. [Maybe, it has something to do with the cosmic architecture.] ~ If we understand the dual aspect of the Cosmic Trimurti - 'Shiva-Brahma-Vishnu' and 'Parvati-Sarasvati-Lakshmi' - we will understand this. ~ And then, we can also fully comprehend what the 'Cosmic Duality' or 'ArdhaNarishvara'/ 'ArdhaNarishvari' concept is all about. [~ Impersonal (nirguna - without qualities), unmanifested (niraakar, avyaktah - without form) Brahmn - Absolute OM/Brahmn ('Shiva-Brahma-Vishnu') + manifested (saakar, vyaktah), saguna Almighty OM/Brahm-putri or Brahmi or Brahmani - 'Parvati-Sarasvati-Lakshmi'. ~ This also explains the concepts of Advaita (monism), Dvaita (dualism or duality) and Astika (theism). | Here, 'Putri' = manifestation, embodiment or personification.]

Sarasvati Gayatri Mantra:link2.

|| OM Sarasvatyei Vidmahe, Brahmaputriye Dhimahi, Tanno Devi Prachodayat || ~ "OM. May we meditate on the Great Goddess Sri Sarasvati, who is the embodiment/manifestation/personification - Brahm-putri - of the (impersonal, unmanifested) Absolute OM/Brahmn - the impersonal Cosmic Trimurti of 'Shiva-Brahma-Vishnu', and who is also the embodiment/manifestation/personification of the majestic Sun-God (Pratyaksh-Brahmn - symbolizing the self-effulgent impersonal, unmanifested Absolute OM). May that effulgent Maha Sarasvati Devi inspire and illumine our mind and understanding." 

[~ Goddess Sarasvati is also known as Brahmi - manifestation of the impersonal, unmanifested cosmic Brahma - the Supreme Creator or Srashtaa. ~ She is also known known as Brahmani - manifestation of the impersonal, unmanifested cosmic Brahmn - the impersonal Absolute OM.| The majestic Sun-God (Pratyaksh-Brahmn - symbolizing the impersonal, unmanifested Brahm-jyotih) stands for an embodiment of knowledge, prosperity, spiritual light, wisdom, intellectual illumination, and so on. ~ Goddess Sarasvati embodies or represents all of this.]
 
~ Self-realization is the process of genuine, inner spiritual transformation and must be experienced to be understood, since it lies beyond the domain of scriptural description or academic definition (terminologies, etc). This 'way of life' is performative and is (therefore) to be experienced. Thus, the central concepts of dharma and karm-yog elude translation. | Self-realization is the essence of Sanaatan Dharma. Rather, self-realization is Sanaatan Dharma (Adi Dharma). ... Self-realization leads to Ananda (inner joy, peace, tranquility or true contentment) ~ the eternal bliss or spiritual ecstasy (true contentment) of self-realization ~ Sat-cit-ānanda.| The union or confluence of the jiva-atma (the mere Self or individual consciousness) with the atman (Higher Self or Supersoul - the Universal Consciousness) is called Sanaatan Dharma or Adi Dharma. | Adi = foremost, most ancient; Dharma = path of illumination ~ noble 'way of life'.

Once (during his famous trip abroad), some people drew Swami Vivekananda's attention toward a pile of books ~ sacred books of every faith, stacked high against the wall. The Srimad Bhagavad-Gita lay at the bottom, while the other books were piled on top of it. ~ The ones who drew Swami-ji's attention towards this arrangement perhaps intended it as a slight or snub ~ since he hailed from a colonized nation; probably there were some (misguided and thoughtless) aspects arising out of colour of skin too. However, Swami-ji (in his characteristic serene manner) smilingly responded that it was the right arrangement, since the root is always at the bottom.

Vivekananda means: 'one who derives happiness through one's consciousness' or one who has achieved eternal bliss of self-realization - Sat-cit-ananda (pronounced as: sach-chid-ananda). (refer relevant passages) |Sat describes an essence that is pure (perfect i.e. inner perfection - non-deluded by transient aspects and non-attachment to sense objects) and timeless (eternal - non-evanescent or non-transient); cit is consciousness (union of the individual consciousness with the universal consciousness - that comes about with the complete awakening of the latent spiritual energy - kundalini - lying dormant at the base of the spine); ananda is inner joy and tranquility or absolute bliss (spiritual ecstasy or true contentment).

.............................................................

Aham Brahmasmi (ah-HUM brah-MAHS-mee) ~ Brhadaranyaka Upanishad, 1.4.10 (of the Yajur Veda.) 

~ Aham = I, Brahmasmi = am Brahmn. | Meaning: I Am Brahmn (~ indicating the confluence of the jiva-atma (mere Self, individual consciousness or finite) with the Higher Self (Atman or Supersoul - universal consciousness - the Infinite).

The impersonal (nirguna - without qualities) and unmanifested (niraakar, avyaktah - without form) Brahmn (the Absolute OM - 'Brahm-jyotih' or 'Aadi Shakti' - Primal Creative Energy) is defined as the one self-existent impersonal spirit - the Divine Essence, from which all things emanate, by which they are sustained, and to which they return. |The impersonalAbsolute OM is beyond all thought. | Primal Creative Energy ('Brahm-jyotih' or 'Aadi Shakti') does not mean feminine energy. Energy has no form or gender. ~ Primal Cosmic Energy is Purusha - Cosmic Energy or Supreme Cosmic Spirit. | The Cosmic Entity or Primal Being is Purushottama (Supreme Being) or Purushottama Satya - Supreme Godhead. | The impersonal Absolute OM is Omprakash (Cosmic Light or Light Divine). The Almighty is Omswaroop - manifestation of the impersonal, unmanifested Absolute OM.

~ It is the light (divine effulgence or light divine) that impersonalists perceive in the Nirguna(impersonal, unmanifested - avyaktah, Niraakar) mode of God/Almighty.

There are two aspects of Brahmn. | One is the Absolute OM/Brahmn. The other is Brahma-putri - the Almighty OM or God. | The Absolute OM/Brahmn is the impersonal, unmanifested or avyaktah, Niraakar Brahmn ~Cosmic Light or Light Divine (i.e. divine effulgence - 'Brahm-jyotih' or 'Aadi Shakti') - Primal Creative Energy. | The other is Mahat (the Great One, Guiding Spirit, Higher Soul; also: universal mind, cosmic intelligence) or Ishvari (the Almighty). Mahat is the Cosmic Entity (Cosmic Ruler and Cosmic Teacher/Steward-mentor - the Primordial or Primal Being). ~ Mahat or Ishvari is the motive power and guiding spirit behind the mathematically precise universes; the supreme power/authority of the universe/cosmos - adhaataa(above whom there is no other). Mahat or Ishvari is Jagat-patih or Vishva Nath - Sovereign or Monarch (Nath) of the Universe and Lord of Creation. |The Cosmic Entity (Almighty OM) is (thus) the highest possible conception of the Absolute OM/Brahmn('Brahm-jyotih' or 'Aadi Shakti')~ the impersonal, unmanifested (avyaktah, Niraakar) Brahmn - Cosmic Light or Light Divine - Divine effulgence, which is beyond all thought. | Mahat or Ishvari is (therefore) manifestedBrahmn - vyaktah, saguna, Saakar Brahmn. | As manifested Brahmn (i.e. as vyaktah, saguna, saakar Brahmn) ~ Mahat or Ishvari (the Cosmic Entity) is Omswaroop - manifestation of Absolute OM. | Mahat or Ishvari - the Cosmic Entity - is also kartaa: The doer, maargah: The path, and neyah: The guide.

~ (Aham = I, Brahmasmi = am Brahmn. |Meaning: I Am Brahmn. ~ As you think, so you become. Think you are Brahmn; Brahmn you will become).

... Fill the mind with Atman/Supersoul. Then the mind becomes identified with Brahmn (Higher Self or universal consciousness). In other words: the mind becomes Sattvic, immune from selfish or worldly thoughts.

~ As you think, so you become. Think you are Brahmn; Brahmn you will become. ~ This means: your entire being, your karm, your thoughts... will reflect that (sattvic aspects).

When the mind is attached to objects of the senses and to that which lies without, mental focus and rational stability are impaired, as is concentration and steadfastness. As a result, such attachment (of the senses) leads to narrow selfish (sakama) thoughts, inconstancy and lack of direction. [The mind is thus weak, agitated or fickle.] But when the mind is withdrawn from sense-objects and given dharmicdirection (i.e. doing what is for the larger good with inner detachment; steadfast karm/effort with equanimity and equipoise - for the larger good), this fleeting flux of attachment (or selfish thoughts) vanishes and dharmic fixity is established. ~ The mind - having acquired an attitude of concentration and equipoise - is thus balanced and steadfast, and (therefore) is now free to establish its sovereignty and dharmic authority. [i.e. The mind is Sattvic - immune from selfish or worldly thoughts.] ~ It is the state of Turyaga- the state of a Muni/Jnani or "yogi" - a truly enlightened person; it does not indicate renunciation, though; it means: being unaffected by sense objects or worldly objects; it leads to (inner) "detachment" (Jeevan Mukta) ~ allowing one to enter into thoughtless (tranquil, non-deluded) awareness ornirvikalpa samadhi to 'awaken' to "Moksha" (liberation). | When the mind is completely absorbed in one object of meditation, it is termed Samadhi.

Having gained the realization of the Ultimate/Eternal Truth (Self-realization), one is never again deluded. (~ A self-realized being possesses the mental maturity and intellectual discrimination to differentiate between the enduring and the ephemeral/transient or trivial aspects - like the swan/hamsah.) ~ When the mind is withdrawn from the sense objects and deep reflection sets in, the objective consciousness is 'closed' - i.e. submerging of the individual self's ego-consciousness within the universal consciousness or Higher Self; Savitarka Samadhi commences. This is Samadhi (meditation/introspection or awareness) with reasoning. The mind here is free from worldly thoughts; such thoughts cannot enter now. The mind is (thus) Sattvic. (It can be called Chitta Suddhi. Chitta = Cit). | When the mind is completely absorbed in one object of meditation, it is termed Samadhi. ~ Nishkam karm-yog (selfless action or service to humanity) is also a kind of meditation. It destroys the ego (negative or false pride, inflated ego, ahankara, narrow perspective, vainglory, contempt, etc). ~ Nishkam karm-yog requires complete self-sacrifice (total devotion)... of selfless action or service to humanity. Such a yogi is a Nishkam karm-yogi (~ possessing monk-like focus, non-deluded by transient aspects, non-selfish and non-attachment to sense objects). ~ Such a karm-yogi is hamsah - the swan. [~ This also explains what 'Sada-Shiva' and 'Bhola Nath' means.] |Complete self-sacrifice of selfless action or service (i.e. total devotion to a greater societal cause) = to give up a carefree life, to be prepared for myriad barbs, bile and so forth. ~ And to display equanimity - to not be affected or feel exalted by success or praise or accolades + to not feel dejected by setbacks, lack of quick or instant tangible results/outcome, barbs, and so on. | Fame, success, glory et al are transient.

~ When one enters into nirvikalpa samadhi(thoughtless or tranquil, non-selfish or non-deluded awareness), one's heart is larger than the universe itself. One 'sees' the universe as a tiny dot inside one's vast heart. (Aham Brahmasmi ~ I am Brahmn - represents the union or confluence of the mere Self (jiva-atma or individual consciousness) with the Higher Self (atman or Supersoul - universal consciousness). ~ One then (in a manner of speaking) reflects the light of every being in the universe, and one's light is reflected in them. ['Aalo Aamar Aalo': link.] One can feel the expansiveness of one's being... an expression of the infinite field of intelligence and all possibilities. ~ Becoming one with the soul is possible only in the Nirvikalpa Samadhi state - i.e. when the mind is Sattvic - free from all worldly or narrow selfish thoughts. |Should one hold communion with the Higher Self (Atman or Supersoul - universal consciousness), devoid of mental attachments (to sense objects) etc, then the great bondage of the mind will cease, all doubts will vanish, all pratibandha or vighna (impediments of the mind and spirit) will disappear, and all (negative/prarabda) karmas will perish. ... It is then (i.e. only after attaining the stage of Nirvikalpa Samadhi - when the mind is Sattvic, free from all selfish, worldly thoughts, etc) that one gains Realization of God and the Self (~ Self-realization or Param-aatma realization.) ~ It is then that Jiva-atma (the mere Self or individual consciousness) becomes identical with the Higher Self or Supersoul (Atman or Param-atma- universal consciousness). ... In other words: to dissolve in each other in a cosmic way. [~ 'Hridayo Basanta Boney Je': link. Tagore is referring to 'Self-realization' and the inner joy, tranquility and contentment of self-realization - sat-cit-ananda.]

~ Self-realization (or Param-aatma realization) is to fully know and understand oneself (atmavidya - self-reflection). Before knowing God, it is important to know oneself (Ātmavidyā or "knowledge of the Self"). If one understands oneself... only then it is possible to understand God, i.e. only then can one gain Brahmavidyā or "knowledge of Brahmn", Manifested Cosmos, etc. [~ Here, Brahmn = Higher Self, Atman, Param-atma or Supersoul - Universal Consciousness.] With the realization of the Universal Consciousness (Atman, Supersoul or Higher Self) come universal compassion, love, and the awareness of the oneness of all things (higher knowledge).

..............................................................

The hamsah (either the white swan or the bar-headed white goose) is an important element in the symbology found in Sanaatan Dharma - and represents: wisdom (of non-transient knowledge) and beauty (sundar = sattvic traits - auspiciousness, goodness, non-selfish and devoid of narrow perspective; in other words: inner perfection). The Hamsarepresents perfect union, balance and life. | A constant repetition of the word "hamso" changes it to "Soaham", which means: "That I am" or "I am He". | Ham-sa when inverted reads as sa-ham, which in Sanskrit means: 'the oneness of the human (finite) and the divine (Infinite)'. ~ Hence, the hamsa is often identified with the Eternal Truth (Sat/Satya) and Sundar (auspiciousness, goodness, non-selfish and devoid of narrow perspective - sattvictraits; inner perfection). 

The Hamsa is seen as a symbol of purity/perfection (inner perfection - non-deluded (dhirah) due to sense control, non-selfish + sat-cit-ananda), detachment (the dharmic freedom of inner detachment or Jeevan Mukta - due to non-attachment to sense objects), divine knowledge, cosmic breath (prana or universal consciousness, the spiritual energy - kundalini) and the highest spiritual accomplishment. It is supposed to transcend the limitations of creation - for it can walk on the earth, fly in the sky (air) and swim in the water. Just as the swan or hamsa lives on water but its feathers do not get damp, similarly a Hamsan (i.e. a true yogi/ascetic - a real karm-yogi) lives in this material or manifest world full of Maya (transience), yet remains detached and is not impacted by its transient or evanescent nature. A hamsan- a true yogi, a real karm-yogi - thus possesses sense control, which requires a steadfast and alert intellect. (~ Essentially the state of a Buddha.)

'Aji Jhara Jhara Mukharo Badoro Diney': link. ('... oi balaka-r pathakhani nitey chiney...' balaka = white goose or hamsa. |'Meghamallar shara dinaman | baje jharonaro (spring, fountain) gaan...' is a reference to Goddess Sarasvati). ~ Tagore also hints at the source of his inspiration; he credits the Goddess for his multifaceted talent and vast oeuvre. 

'Chaander Haasir Baandh Bhengechhe': link. (~ 'Neel gaganer lalatkhani chandan-e aaj makha,banibaner hamsa-mithun melechhe aaj pakha...') | Hamsa-mithun = the Cosmic Duality (~ the dual aspects of the Trimurti - the cosmic, impersonal, unmanifested'Shiva-Brahma-Vishnu' and the manifested, saguna'Parvati-Sarasvati-Lakshmi' ~refer the relevant passages. | Melechhe aaj pakha = ascent).

'Prana Bhoriye Trisha Hariye': link. [prana, the breath of life or vital energy - cit or cetana - sentience; it is a reference to the 'awakening' of the latent spiritual energy - kundalini.]

~ The hamsa is supposed to possess the ability to separate the water from the cream (in milk). The hamsa's ability to separate milk and water symbolizes the need to intellectually discriminate or differentiate between positive and negative aspects (i.e. between the enduring/durable and the evanescent/ephemeral/trivia). E.g: The English language, in a generic sense, was the (metaphoric or proverbial) 'amrit' that arose out of a (symbolic) 'manthan' - colonization. ~ Today this language is a link language - globally. |Tagore said: "We must recognize that it is providential that the West has come to India. And yet some one must show the East to the West, and convince the West that the East has her contribution to make to the history of civilization." [~ Tagore saw the need for international cooperation and sharing. The bard advised (rather insisted) that India must learn from other nations, for example, in science, as well as look inward. Tagore believed that India had a message for the world, but he thought India must also incorporate others' messages into her own cultural and intellectual repertoire. Tagore also believed that inner development or cultivation of the self was vital, that India too must develop herself from within... instead of merely relying upon or borrowing others' ideas and innovations.] 

During pranayama, which is a yogic exercise of breath control, the inhalation is believed to sound like "ham", while the exhalation is believed to sound like "sa". Thus, a hamsa came to epitomize the prana, the breath of life.

Ajapa (A + Japa = No + Chant) is the primal Mantra.

This chantless Mantra pervades the breath going in and out, the subtle sound 'sah' going in and the subtle sound 'ham' going out. (Sa = Siva, Vishnu, Lakshmi, or Gauri; Ham = I am; so = Parvati.) As one chants this subtle-sound Mantra 'soham', a derivative of 'sah-ham', 'Hamsa' comes into being by inversion. Soham, Hamsa and AUM (Pranavah) are equipotent.

OM or AUM is the sound of primal energy - Omkar. | Bhairava - the Primordial sound (Pranava Naad or Shabda Brahmn). | This aspect is found in our national anthem too.

Soham is the unintonated sound of normal breathing, meaning: 'I am He.' ["aham" + "sa"]

The awareness that one is inseparable from or is a part of the divine (Brahmn) - exists only in enlightened persons.

Tagore's 'Prana Bhoriye Trisha Hariye': link. |  '... Tabo bhubhaney tabo bhabhaney morey aaro aaro aaro dao sthan | Aaro aalo, aaro aalo, ei nayaney prabhu (My Lord) dhalo | surey surey banshi purey tumi aaro aaro aaro dao taan. ... Mor aami (ego-consciousness) dube jak nemey sudhadharey aponare (universal consciousness/Supersoul/Higher Self) tumi aaro aaro aaro karo daan...' ~ the infinite (boundless - universal consciousness) within the bound of the form (finite - individual consciousness).

It became the keynote of his life: the great is to be found in the small, the infinite within the bound of the form (finite), and the eternal freedom of the soul in universal love, collaborative reflection, compassion (humanism) and understanding. ~ That the trials of obstacles, the burning of sorrow only deepens that joy (~ turning hardships into motivation and inspiration). He embraced human life and humanity's very existence on earth with such exuberant ecstasy. Through varied artistic outlets, he explored the ecstatic bliss (sat-cit-ananda) of the Universal Soul (universal consciousness or Higher Self) in the human soul (individual consciousness or mere Self).

"A human being is a part of a whole, called by us 'universe', a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest... a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest to us. Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty."  ~ Albert Einstein

'Mor aami (ego-consciousness) dube jak nemey sudhadharey aponare (universal consciousness/Supersoul/Higher Self - universal intelligence or cosmic mind) tumi aaro aaro aaro karo daan'

~ Tagore is referring to the spiritual ecstasy - inner joy, peace and tranquility (true contentment) of 'self-realization' (~ the confluence of the mere Self/finite - individual consciousness with the Higher Self/Infinite - universal consciousness). |Tagore aspires for his ego-consciousness (the finite'I') to be completely submerged in the Higher Self - the infinite'I' ~ so as to awaken in the Higher Self. | He aspires to realize the Infinite'I' within the finite'I' ~ i.e. he aspires to transcend the narrow or selfish/self-centred philosophy to the philosophy of life, to the philosophy of the greater whole - the continuum. ~ 'Aamar Ei Path Chawoatei Ananda': link. | He does not want to be confined inside his own head (courtesy ego, arrogance, contempt, selfishness, confusion, delusion, vainglory, etc); instead, he wants to become a connected part of the greater cosmos (universal consciousness or universal mind). ~ He wants the Higher Self to pervade his entire being. He, as an individual, no longer wishes to remain disconnected from the universe around him. ~ Instead, he aspires for inner perfection; he aspires to be completely tuned in with the Higher Self (the Infinite'I') - Chandra-Tara-Rabi~ to dissolve in each other in a cosmic way.

Tagore on progress: "You have to judge progress according to its aim. A railway train makes its progress towards the terminus station - it is a movement. But a full grown tree has no definite movement of that kind. Its progress is the inward progress of life. It lives, with its aspiration towards light tingling in its leaves and creeping in its silent sap." 

~ Tagore, the great polymath, became the first-ever Asian and the first non-European to win the Nobel Prize in Literature (in 1913). [~ The East and West did meet.] As a thought leader, renaissance poet and playwright/dramatist/lyricist he advanced a vast canon that comprised paintings, sketches and doodles, hundreds of texts, and over two thousand songs (Rabindrasangeet - Tagore's magnificent music). His elegant and magical poetry is noted for their rhythmic and lyrical nature. | Tagore's life as a peripatetic litterateur was dedicated towards cultural rapprochement; as a humanist, universalist and internationalist, his message of Asian brotherhood and internationalism was a cautionary note vis-a-vis the pitfalls or counterproductiveness or myopia of narrow, selfish, unifocal nationalism (~ especially in a kaleidoscopic nation like India + given the ancientness of our civilization). He also cautioned against the approach of negativism called lethargy, ignorance, moribund discourse, finger-pointing, inertia, and other members of that brood. |"Each country of Asia will solve its own historical problems according to its strength, nature and needs, but the lamp they will each carry on their path to progress will converge to illuminate the common ray of knowledge."| Tagore disliked rote classroom schooling. He held that proper teaching does not explain things; proper teaching stokes curiosity: "[It] knock[s] at the doors of the mind. If any boy is asked to give an account of what is awakened in him by such knocking, he will probably say something silly. For what happens within is much bigger than what comes out in words. Those who pin their faith on university examinations as the test of education take no account of this."~ He emphasized on education - knowledge and intellectual curiosity (as opposed to learning by rote). "These solidly complete Universities over which our country is brooding, are like hard boiled eggs from which you cannot expect chickens to come out."| In old age, Tagore still rose long before dawn to witness the birth of each new day, and he still wrote fluently in his own hand. He liked to make extensive corrections; he also liked his manuscripts to be elegant. His artist's eye for his handwriting were revealed in the simple artistic and rhythmic leitmotifs embellishing the scribbles, corrections, and word layouts of his manuscripts. ~ His genius enriched whatever it touched.

............................................................

Tagore's portrayal and celebration of a higher power embedded in the fabric of the universe and responsible for its continuing existence and operation is very fascinating, indeed. | ~ Tagore celebrates the Divine, the Infinite - the Anant ... and expresses a sense of deep wonder in the universe:

~ 'Biswabinarobe Biswajon': link.

~ 'Maharaj, Eki Saaje': link.

~ 'Aamar Khyala Jakhon Chhilo Tomar Shoney': link.

~ 'Saara Jiban Dilo Aalo': link.

~ 'Aakash Bhora Surjo Tara': link.

~ 'Mahabishwe Mahakaashe 1': link.

~ 'Mahabishwe Mahakaashe 2': link.

~ 'Tahare Arati Kare Chandra Tapan Deva Manava'link.

~ 'Jaage Nath Jochhonaraate': link. 

Tagore was a genius in many fields - poetry, short stories, plays and novels, music, choreography, painting, science, education, social service and statesmanship. A renaissance poet par excellence... this minstrel-bard of numerous songs was simply in a rarest class by himself. A Sadhaka of scholarship, knowledge and the cosmic mind, he was a strikingly handsome figure with piercing eyes and intelligent cerebral looks, an intellectual luminary who possessed an inner charm... that emerges in his inspiring words and his lyrically unequaled songs. Elements of Indian classical music has been integrated in an extremely intelligent and effective manner in his magnificent songs - Rabindra-sangeet - which embodies a mesmerizing fusion of his musicianship and poetic genius. Tagore's unrivaled arena of creativity, where he produced prodigious volumes of poems, songs, dramas, essays, novels, travelogues and short stories with seemingly endless energy - are his everlasting gifts ~ the infinite treasures of his oeuvre. Tagore's boundless curiosity also carried him into the realm of physical sciences, and his interest in scientific inquiry, his meetings and conversations with Albert Einstein (among others) are quite well known, and have now become part of the Tagore lore. He never deviated from his dharma, which was poetic creativity, contributing to the society, collaborative reflection and intellectual engagement - exchange of thoughts and ideas - to convey and bring forth a more substantive perception and analysis. ~ Absence of scholarly engagement, even informal ones, gives rise to redundant and moribund discourse. ~ He believed that at all times the beauty in life is to be found in all pursuits of knowledge, and knowledge or development in isolation is never complete. Hence, his emphasis on cultural, scientific and social exchange between all peoples in all places. ~ He envisioned an India imbued with the noblest of her ancient civilizational ideals: that of acceptance, exchange and the striving for human perfection through a loving and reverential appreciation of nature and identification of the infinite within the finite. | To illustrate his theory of education, Tagore enjoyed recounting the following incident: "I well remember the surprise and annoyance of an experienced headmaster, reputed to be a successful disciplinarian, when he saw one of the boys of my school climbing a tree and choosing a fork of the branches for settling down to his studies. I had to say to him in explanation that "childhood is the only period of life when a civilized man can exercise his choice between the branches of a tree and his drawing-room chair, and should I deprive this boy of that privilege because I, as a grown up man, am barred from it?" What is surprising to notice is the same headmaster's approbation of the boys' studying botany. He believes in an impersonal knowledge of the tree because that is science, but not in a personal experience of it."| Tagore was not narrowly national, he did not believe in intellectual regimentation either (~ "where the mind is without fear" - here, fear = intellectual regimentation, straitjacketing, cynicism, specious discourse and stagnation). He also believed in the wisdom of knowledge - 'coz knowledge in the absence of wisdom is merely mechanical regurgitation; he believed in a broader vision, a longer-term understanding of issues + dignity of labour ("and the head is held high"). His message was for the world. And yet, he remained a passionate Indian. ... He drew inspiration from the deep wells (vast repertoire) of wisdom and thought and culture. ~ He saw himself as an inheritor, representative and expositor of India's age-old heritage (civilizational values and ideals). His writings constitute the best commentary on his life. These reveal him as nothing else does. ... The universal bard is to be found in his poems. ~ Tagore's vast legacy of creativity, intellectual freedom, relentless striving towards inner perfection, harmony amongst people and harmony of people with nature, the unbounded joy of life which has discovered its own rich resources - these are a priceless gift to India, and indeed, the world. 

Many decades ago, Tagore encouraged the idea of reforestation (Vriksharopan) at a time when there was no such thing as a wave of nature conservation, climate change, Earth Hour or Earth Day. ~ On one such occasion, he celebrated nature and woodlands by planting trees during a festival he called Vanamahotsava(Celebration of Forests). At that time, he wrote the song 'Marubijayer Ketan Udao Shunye Heye Prabal Pran' ('Raise aloft the banner of the conquest of the desert') - link - which carried emphatically the idea of fertile soil and the connection of life itself to the soil and the bounty that it brings forth.

.................................................................

~Chakras are centers of Prāṇa, life-force, or vital energy. Chakras correspond to vital points in the physical body i.e. major plexuses of arteries, veins and nerves. The 7 Chakrasare the energy centers in our body in which energy flows through. ~ Kundalini is vital for all the 7 Chakras (centers of Prāṇa, life-force, or vital energy) to be fully'awakened'. ~ And this happens when the latent spiritual energy lying dormant at the base of the spine - kundalini - reaches the 7thchakra - the Sahasrara or crown chakra (the highest chakra). ~ This is the chakra of (symbolic) one thousand petals. |The symbolic crown jewel.

BG 10.22: || indriyanam manas casmi bhutanam asmi cetana || ~ "Of the senses (indriyanam) I am the mind (manas); and in living beings (bhutanam) I am the living force (cit or consciousness - sentience)" ~ (Chakras are centers of Prāṇa, life-force, or vital energy. The 7 Chakrasare the energy centers in our body in which energy flows through).

If we can understand this, we will also understand what has been meant by: Karna's 'chariot wheel sank deep into the ground'. [Literally: Karna = ears. Kundal = ear-ring; though it is probably derived from "kundalini" (refer the relevant passages on Kundalini and Sahasrara or crown chakra).] | As per the narrative, Karna's 'chariot wheel sank deep into the ground' at a crucial time; he was, thus, unable to recollect the 'mantra'for unleashing certain weaponry (~ this is indicative of cognitive dulling;  the dulling of Karna's memory). ~ Wheel = cakra or chakra, and (very likely) refers to Karna's mind chakra or Manasa Chakra, which is connected with most of the head (especially the brain), is a combination of sensing and intellect. [Maybe, only by weakening of Karna's "kundal"... could this unnatural human, ('son' of Lord Surya, a higher being, and Kunti - begotten through advanced genetic engineering) be rendered inactive; otherwise nothing else could affect him (~ as indicated by the "kavacha" - that was part of his genetic makeup.) ~ Hence, Karna could never have donated either his "kaavacha" or his "kundaal". 

Living force (cit or sentience) = cetana or consciousness = life force or vital energy; ~ kundalini energy... when fully awakened unites the mere Self or lower manas i.e. lower mind or individual consciousness with the Higher Self (Supersoul, Atman or higher manas - Universal Consciousness). ~ The jiva-atma to the Param-atma. | ... This is the state of complete wisdom (the wisdom of non-transient knowledge) - highest enlightenment (para vidya) - the state of a Buddha. ~ The convergence of the lower manas (lower mind/self, jiva-atma or individual consciousness) with the higher manas  (higher mind/self, atman or universal consciousness) brings about sat-cit-ananda - inner joy, peace and tranquility i.e. true contentment of Self-realization or Paramatma-realization. It results in self-knowledge through self-reflection, insight, perception and internal wisdom (the wisdom of knowledge). ... Such a soul/person is dhirah - temperate (~ non-deluded by the transience of the material world that he or she inhabits + possesses inner detachment to sense objects - fame, glory, accolades and so on). | In other words: such a person achieves inner perfection.

[Sat-Cit-Ananda: for purposes of comprehension and clarity: the function of the mind and the heart are completely different. None can think with their heart. ~ That is a colloquial phrase taken literally. |Citis not a reference to the heart. Cit (cetana - sentience) is a reference to the mere Self (individual consciousness). While, Satis a reference to the Higher Self or Universal Consciousness (Param-atma or Supersoul - the eternal aspect). | The confluence of the Cit(mere Self or individual consciousness - sentience) with the Sat (Higher Self or universal consciousness - universal intelligence or cosmic mind) is brought about by the complete 'awakening' of the latent spiritual energy lying dormant at the base of the spine - the kundalini energy.]

... Goddess Sarasvati represents intelligence, wisdom, consciousness (the spiritual energy - kundalini - lying dormant at the base of the spine - but which when fully 'awakened' unites the mere Self or individual consciousness with the Higher Self or Universal Consciousness), cosmic knowledge, creativity, education (not merely text-bookish or transient knowledge - apara vidya), culture, enlightenment, music, the arts, eloquence (fine speech, persuasion/ vāk) and so on. The goddess of knowledge and arts represents the free flow of wisdom and consciousness (sentience).

~ If we understand the above, we can then fully comprehend Tagore's sublime 'Nirjarer Swapnabhango' ('Awakening/Rousing of the Fountain'). Fountain = spring or sarasa. | He is celebrating the awakening of his latent spiritual energy - kundalini ~ resulting in him gaining insight and delving deeper into his internal wisdom (the wisdom of knowledge); with the gradual disappearance of illusions... clarity begins - to see the big picture, transcend egocentricity, and finding the deeper meaning inherent in all things (para vidya - non-transient  knowledge). ~ The resultant synergy took him to the pinnacle of creativity.

~Chakras are centers of Prāṇa, life-force, or vital energy. Chakras correspond to vital points in the physical body i.e. major plexuses of arteries, veins and nerves. The 7 Chakrasare the energy centers in our body in which energy flows through. ~ Kundalini is vital for all the 7 Chakras (centers of Prāṇa, life-force, or vital energy) to be fully 'awakened'. ~ And this happens when the latent spiritual energy lying dormant at the base of the spine - kundalini - reaches the 7thchakra - the Sahasrara or crown chakra (the highest chakra). ~ This is the chakra of (symbolic) one thousand petals. | The symbolic crown jewel.

'Arup Tomar Bani': link. (~ 'nityakaaler utsab taba bishwer dveepalika [Omswaroop - universal consciousness], aami shudhu taarii maatir pradeep (earthen lamp), jvalao tahar shikha'(wick - symbolizing the 7th chakra - the Sahasrara or crown chakra; it essentially signifies the enlightenment of the brain cells). | Note how brilliantly Tagore conveys the confluence or convergence of the finite into the Infinite. His mere Self within the Higher Self... leading to his spiritual and intellectual awakening and evolution. ~ His journey towards the awareness that the finite is inseparable from or is a part of the Infinite - the divine(Param-atma or Higher Self). | In other words: self-realization. | And so, he says in 'Sheemar Majhe Ashim Tumi' - 'aamar modhye tomaar prakash tai ato madhur'.

~ 'tyemni aamar praner (individual consciousness or cetana - sentience) kendrey nishvas (universal consciousness - by the 'awakening' of the latent spiritual energy - kundalini) dao purey, shunya tahar purna koriya dhanya koruk shurey(to emerge as his spiritual and intellectual evolution... and manifold creativity)'~ Tagore is asking for his individual consciousness (cit - sentience) to be fully awakened ~ to experience 'sat-cit-ananda'. |He aspires to realize the Infinite'I' (universal consciousness - Param-atma) within the finite'I' (individual consciousness - jiva-atma) ~ Self-realization. This happens with the confluence or convergence of the individual consciousness (the mere Self) with the universal consciousness (Atman, Higher Self or Supersoul - universal intelligence or cosmic mind). 

'Sheemar Majhe Ashim Tumi': link.|~ 'Sheemar majhe (within finites) ashim tumi (You the Infinite) bajao apon shur (play your own tune), aamar modhye tomaar prakash tai ato madhur'~ The second line is indicative of Tagore experiencing 'sat-cit-ananda' - through the confluence of his finite 'I' (mere Self or individual consciousness) with the Infinite 'I' (Higher Self, Supersoul or universal consciousness) ~ self-realization or Param-atma realization - the realization of the Infinite'I' within the finite'I' - his journey towards  inner perfection. Tagore also hints at the source of his inspiration; he credits the Goddess for his multifaceted talent and vast oeuvre.

'Mor Bina Othe': link. ('Mor bina othe kon suurey baaji kon naba chanchala chhandey | Mama antara kampita aaji nikhiler hridayaspandey')

On a separate note: the name Vivekananda - 'one who derives happiness through one's consciousness' or one who has achieved eternal bliss of self-realization (Sat-cit-ananda) - too conveys this essence and is indicative of the communion of the mere Self (individual consciousness) with the Higher Self (universal consciousness).

Self-realization is (therefore) the pathway or route to inner perfection. | The process of Self-realization is a spiritual transition or spiritual awakening ~ wherein humans reach a higher level of existence, by moving out of his or her inferior manas (lower mind or lower self) and into the superior manas (higher mind or Higher Self). ~ This transition or awakening must be experienced to be understood, since it lies beyond the domain of scriptural description or academic definition (terminologies, etc). Self-realization is the essence of Sanaatan Dharma. This 'way of life' is performative and is (therefore) to be experienced. There is no one path or hard-and-fast rule to self-realization. It depends on individuals. ~ Thus, the central concepts of dharma and karm-yog elude translation.

The Almighty does not discriminate.

BG 10.24: || sarasam asmi sagarah || ~ "and of bodies of water I am the ocean." ~ This conveys boundlessness.


The Rig Veda says: || Ekam Sat Vipraha Bahudha Vadanti|| ~ Truth is one, but the wise know/call it as many. |In other words: God is one, but we can approach the Almighty in many ways.

Truth/Sat/Satya = Shaashvata or Sanaatana - Eternal. | Sat/Satya = the Eternal Truth; also, timeless essence or true (non-transient) knowledge - enlightenment or complete wisdom - the wisdom of non-transient knowledge -para vidya. ~ The ability to see the big picture and/or to find the deeper meaning inherent in all things. The awareness that the finite is inseparable from or is a part of the Infinite - divine(Param-atma).

Tagore envisioned a parallelism - the parallelism of welding together (i.e. amalgamation) into one body various peoples (~ and this is reminiscent of the Universal Form - Vishwaroop or Viraat-roop - of the Primordial.) 

A quote from Swami Vivekananda's speech (Welcome Address - Chicago, Sept 11, 1893) ~ in response to the warm and cordial welcome he received: "As the different streams having their sources in different places all mingle their water in the sea, so, O Lord, the different paths which men take through different tendencies, various though they appear, crooked or straight, all lead to Thee." 

Here is 'Ketechhe Akela': link.

'Shhob path eshey miley gyalo shheshey tomaarii duu-khani nayone...' ~ It is a reference to Rudraksha or eye of Rudra. Sanskrit: rudrākşa = rudra and akşa = eye. [Rudraksha and Virupaksha are non-different. Virupaksha = with oblique eyes.] | Rudra-Siva is said to have healing remedies - as the best physician of physicians, and as possessor of a thousand medicines. This is described in Rudra-Siva's alternative name Vaidyanatha (Lord of Remedies). ~ Rudra-Siva and Dhanvantari (the Supreme Druid) are non-different. | However, the eyes of Rudra could also be a reference to two pools (sarasa) - one at Pushkara in Rajasthan and the other - *Ketaksha - in the Salt Range. Both are associated with Rudra-Siva. ~ The Sarasvati River is an important river goddess in the Rig Veda. The Sanskrit name means, "having many pools". | The Matsya kingdom of the Mahabharata times is probably modern-day Rajasthan. Satyavati hailed from this kingdom, and is therefore referred to as Matsya-kanya. (It does not mean fisherwoman or daughter of a fisherman. Kanya = female). She later became the queen of Hastinapura. | Arjun spent the final year of his vana vasa(exile period) - on Krishn's advice - as Brihannala, teaching dance and music - in Virata kingdom (then ruled by the Matsya king - Virata Raj). It was in his courtthat the Pandavas spent a year in concealment (ajgnata vasa) during their exile period. | The thirteenth year was the period of concealment; if discovered the Pandavas were to undergo another thirteen years of exile - as per Duryodhan's terms (following Shakuni's advice). Alternatively, given some of their rituals, it is also possible that the Pandavas' final year of exile - ajgnata vasa - was spent among the Kalasha people (referlink1.) | As for the Matsya kingdom: maybe their insignia or emblem was that of a fish. Did the matsya-avatar hail from this ancient kingdom ~ my guess is as good as yours. | Incidentally, one of the only two Kalkiḥ temples in the country is in Jaipur... quietly awaiting the coming of the final 'Preserver-Rejuvenator' - the Kalkiḥ-avatar. [The other temple is in Uttar Pradesh - probably built by Rani Ahilyabai of the Holkar dynasty.] | Sawai Jai Singh, the founder king of Jaipur, built the temple around 1727 AD - at the time of making the city. Of scholarly inclinations, Jai Singh was a keen student of Vedic texts. He built the Kalkiḥtemple right opposite the eastern entrance to the city palace [BG 10.21: || jyotisam ravir amsuman || ~ "of radiance I am the radiant sun" (ravir amsuman)], which opens into the Sireh Deori bazaar, famous for its Hawa Mahal, the palace of winds. [BG 10.31: || pavanaḥ pavatām asmi || ~ "I am the wind among the purifiers."] ~ Its important location is indicative of the temple's significance for Jai Singh. *However, instead of opening directly into the street, the temple was set behind the street facades of impressive structures. Only the temple top is seen rising into the sky from the street-scape. Facing the temple in one corner is a canopied kiosk, which contains a fine white marble statue of a horse. [Kalkiḥ, also referred to as Kalkin and Kalaki, is often a metaphor for "Eternity" or "Time". (Time is Kaalah in Sanskrit.) ~ Another etymology (for "Kalkiḥ") from Sanskrit is 'white horse'.] | Constructed in stone, the Kalkiḥtemple conforms to the typical style of the North Indian Temple Architecture. However, there is one architectural feature in the Kalkiḥ temple that is unique. It is the presence of two shikhars or temple tops instead of the usual one. [BG 10.23:|| meruh sikharinam aham || ~ "and of mountains I am Meru."] ~ But the temple itself is closed. In fact, it has been closed ever since it was built. (Though it is periodically opened for cleaning purposes). Otherwise, the Kalkiḥ temple has a deserted look. No devotees. No prayers. No temple bells. ~ Maybe, this is so since the final 'Preserver-Rejuvenator' is stated to be a 'Sampoorna Avatar' ~ a total, complete, all-encompassing manifestation (maha-avatar). And so, cannot be associated exclusively with any faith, nor will the Kalkiḥ-avatar be the passive preceptor of any new faith. [~ 'Tomaar Aason Pathbo Kothaay' (composed in Mishra Basant Bahar): link. |'Bhengechho Duaar Eshechho Jyotirmay': link (~ bhengechho duaar/the tearing down of metaphoric doors = the dispelling of inertia, slothfulness, apathy, illusion, confusion, hackneyed and stale aspects, and so on). | And, possibly: 'Tomaar Aason Shunya Aaji': link. |'Aaloker Ei Jharna Dharaaye Dhuiye Dao': link. |'Oi Mahamanob Aashhe' (Cometh the great one): link.]

*Instead of opening directly into the street, the temple was set behind the street facades of impressive structures. Only the temple top is seen rising into the sky from the street-scape. ~ BG 9.11: || avajānanti māḿ mūḍhā mānuṣīḿ tanum āśritam paraḿ bhāvam ajānanto mama bhūta-maheśvaram || ~ "The ignorant deride Me since my form/appearance is human-like (i.e. since I appear to be like any other human). They do not know (are unaware of) My transcendental nature and My supremedominion over all that be (~ as the Supreme Lord [maheśvaram] of all that be)."|avajānanti māḿ mūḍhā (The ignorant deride Me since my form/appearance is human-like, i.e. since I appear to be like any other human): Is this an indication that he puts on a veneer? ~ My guess is as good as yours. | The location of this Kalkiḥ temple is very significant. Since Ketaksha or Katas Raj - also believed to have been Ayudhya - is nearby. ~ BG 10.31: || pavanaḥ pavatām asmi rāmaḥ śastra-bhṛtām aham|| ~ "I am the wind among the purifiers, and Sri Ram among the warriors" ~ i.e. warrior against moribund aspects, retrogressive mindset, worldview, and so on. 

~ The rare blue lotus is termed pushkara. It is also known as krishna kamal - signifying the 'perfection of wisdom' - wisdom of knowledge (brought about by the complete 'awakening' of the kundalini energy - referthe relevant passages on kundalini). [Blue Lotus signifies wisdom and knowledge, and stands for the victory over the senses. It defines a person's control over his or her mind and consciousness, to let go of materialistic aspirations in life and rise to a selfless soul. The blue lotus flower is not fully open, the bud is closed towards the centre, which is never revealed. This state of the flower (the partially-opened bud) is indicative that one should not stop attaining knowledge and wisdom in life. ~ It is associated with the Bodhisattva of wisdom, known as Manjushri (Buddha Manjushri - the Wisdom Buddha - the embodiment of the omniscient wisdom of all enlightened beings), and Prajnaparamita, the one who signifies the 'perfection of wisdom'. ~ The Buddha (Buddha Shakyamuni) is shown seated on a pale-red lotus. A full-bloomed pale-red lotus signifies enlightenment or the stage where nirvana is attained.] ~ Many say: there is no blue lotus, no such flower exists or ever has; that it is a botanical chimera. ~ However, it could be that the blue lotus is an allegory or imagery - a symbolic reference to the Cosmic Entity (the Almighty) and/or the Krishna-avatar (the only Purna Avatar - one in whom divinity is manifested fully, since he possessed all 16 divine attributes). | In other words: the rare blue lotus could be indicative of the unicorn (symbolizing rarity). |The Indus Unicorn Seals depict a one-horned horse. [One-horned = ekashringa. Even Sri Ganesh is depicted with a single tusk.] It is imagery - to denote rarity or uniqueness. The Cosmic Entity is vishama (unequaled); atulah(incomparable); ekah (the one); naikah (the many); ekaatmaa(the one self); asankhyeyah (with countless names and forms); shoorah-veerah(the valiant); vikramee (the most daring); saattvikah (one who is full of sattvic or noble traits and qualities); kartaa (the doer); maargah (the path); neyah (the guide); Vishvaatma (Soul of the Universe - guiding spirit); aadidevah (the first devah; aadi = foremost, primal); mahaadevah (the great devah); deveshah (the Lord of all devas) and adhaataa (above whom there is no other).] |However, a closer look at the unicorn seals reveals a body reminiscent of a horse as well as that of a cow. So, the unicorn could be denoting Goddess Sarasvati - Varadey Kaamarupinee or kamadhenu (the fulfiller of wishes, Destiny or 'Lady Luck'). [~ The saguna, manifested Trimurti of 'Sarasvati-Lakshmi-Parvati' is non-different.] ~ Rivers and cows are often poetically correlated in the Rig Veda. | Goddess Sarasvati (Varadey Kaamarupinee), Sri Krishn and Sri Ganesh (Vignesh or Vighna-vinashak - the remover of obstacles or impediments in the path of good/positive deeds) are non-different. 

*Ketaksha means, "raining eyes" (aksha = eye). ~ Perhaps it was originally meant as: spring (sarasa) of the raining eyes. ~ However, with the passage of time and changing phonetics, Ketaksha probably became Katas. ~ The ancient Katas Raj temple complex is believed to date back to the Mahabharata era. [Mahabharata = the Great history of the Bharatas. | For Bharatas - referlink1.] | It is also associated with the 'Shiv-Sati' story ~ large parts of which (very likely) describes some cosmic event. | The name "Sati" probably is derived from Sat or Satya; possibly a feminine version of Sat or Satya. ~ However, 'Shiva wandering about in the cosmos with Sati's lifeless body on his shoulders' - is very likely a description (in the style of story-telling) of some cosmic event. ... Maybe, pieces of meteors and/or other celestial debris rained down on earth - which (gradually) resulted in the many "Shakti Peeths", as well as pools (sarasa-s or sarovaras). ~ Later translators probably took the allegorical cosmic events in the literal sense. And with the passage of time, the story of Parvati too converged with the narrative. ~ Rudra-Siva is Goddess Parvati herself - simultaneously (as indicated by the syncretic form of Rudra-Shakti). The manifested, saguna Trimurti of 'Sarasvati-Lakshmi-Parvati' are non-different. |Goddess Parvati's consort (namesake Shiva) is very likely the Shiva of the Bhasmasurastory (referlink1.) | (Though, perhaps, a few of the "Shakti Peeths" are in honour of some or the other great woman. Or [maybe] both; i.e. celestial debris + a great human). | Daksha Prajapati's yagna and Sati's 'agni-pariksha': "Prajapati" is a 'title' indicative of a leader, king or chieftain. ~ Therefore, Sati's father - Daksha - was an influential personage. ~ Daksha Prajapati's yagna and Sati's 'agni-pariksha' = Daksha initiated some activity or process (karm-yagna) which turned out to be (his daughter) Dakshayani Sati's 'test by fire' instead, more than his own. Thus, Sati was vulcanized via the most trying of circumstances; it is indicative of her unmatched tenacity and resilience. [~ In 'Aamar Mukti Aloye Aloye' (link), Tagore says: 'Aamar mukti sharbajoner moner majhe dukkha-bipad tuchha kora kothhin kaaje'|My salvation is in the universal mind (sharbajoner moner majhe - in their collective consciousness), and in my exertions belittling/defying all sorrows/disappointments and perils (dukkha bipad tucchha kora), in tasks difficult (kothhin kaaje). ~ Tagore, a humanist, is referring to karm yog, nishkam (selfless) karm yog. To him, this world is the karm-bhoomi (euphemistically yagna-shala) of the World's Master. ... And, he aspires to become a karm-yogi ~ to turn his life and efforts (exertions and creativity) as an offering. Therein lay his salvation. ~ For Swami Vivekananda, service to humanity was the path to self-realization and salvation.] ~ It is possible though that Daksha had a dim view of his somewhat rustic son-in-law named Shiva... and considered him unworthy of his accomplished daughter. | Dakshayani means: daughter of Daksha. The name "Sati" probably is derived from Sat or Satya; possibly a feminine version of Sat or Satya. | Sati and Parvati (popularly known as goddess Durga) is non-different. ~ And both are Rudra-Siva.] 

~ Another version of this legend involves the death of Shiva's horse Katas (Ketaksha?) ... Ketaksha or Katas is also believed to have been Ayudhya. [~ Ayudhya probably became Ayodhya due to changing phonetics.] |Ayudhya = invincible, unconquerable or eternal. "Ayudhya" comes from the root word "yudh" meaning "not to be fought". | There is an Ayutha and Dvaravati in Thailand too. ~ Ancient Ayutha or Ayutthaya - the former capital of Thailand - apparently rose from the earlier, nearby kingdoms of Lavo and Suphannaphoom (Suvarnabhumi). The seaport city of Ayothayais Ayothaya Si Raam Thep Nakhon - the Angelic City of Sri Rama. ~ The new city was known as Ayothaya, or Krung Thep Dvaravadi Si Ayothaya. Later it became widely known as Ayutthaya, the Invincible City. ~ It is believed that this city is associated with the Thai national epic Ramakien, which is a southeastern version of the Ramayana ('The Exertions of Sri Ram'). | Dvaravati was part of the Mon kingdom - and refers to both a culture and a conglomerate of ancient city-states or principalities in the lower plain (riverine region) of the Chao Phraya river. | The term Dvaravati derives from coins which were inscribed in Sanskrit with śrī dvāravatī. The Sanskrit word dvāravatī means "she with many gates" (from dvar"door gate"). Its name is probably derived from the city of Dvāraka (Dvaraka) in ancient India. 

The seven greatest capital cities of the Rama Empire/civilization were known in classical texts as 'The Seven Rishi Cities'. Rishi (Sanskrit: ṛṣI) signifies enlightenment, wisdom and knowledge; it was also an honorific for highly learned and knowledgeable persons. ... Maybe, these Seven Rishi Cities were knowledge hubs or thinking hub. Priest-Kings (meaning: "Great Teachers" or "Masters") who governed the cities were essentially Brahmana statesmen. [Brahmana implies the light of wisdom or the wisdom of knowledge; Brahmana can also be interpreted as sensible and enlightened persons with a broader worldview or outlook.] Some of them belonged to the benevolent aristocracy of the Rama civilization. Today they are generally called "Priest-Kings". They were apparently persons whose mental powers/intellect were of a degree that would seem incredible to most moderns. (Even Chanakya can be called a Brahmana statesman.)

Some legends also state that the very first "Shiva Ling" was in Katas. | The Shiva Ling is very likely the depiction of the Brhmaanda or Brahmaanda (the "Cosmic Egg"; Brh = to grow or to expand; aanda = egg) and "Garbhodaka Ocean" that lies at the bottom of the universe. | How and when the word "ling" came to be associated with "phallus" ~ my guess is as good as yours.

~ There is a vast 'ocean' (the 'ocean of Garbha') present at the bottom of our universe (Brhmaanda or Brahmaand - the "Cosmic Egg"). This 'ocean' is very likely a combination of cosmic dust, energy and gas, even gas hydrates formed under conditions of high pressures and low temperatures, and so on... and maybe, even a great amount of suction force. Its appearance is in the form of 'concentric circles or bands' ~ though none of it is visible to the unaided eye. During "Prakritik Maha Pralaya" ~ (i.e. when Material Universe or Manifested Cosmos is completely dissolved - signifying the cosmic phenomenon of "dissolution") - Material Universe or Manifested Cosmos 'dissolves' into this 'ocean of Garbha'. ~ Our ancients visualized this 'ocean of Garbha' as the endless serpent 'Adi-Sesha' or 'Ananta-Sesha'. [Ananta = infinity, endless, eternal. Sesha = zero, shunya.] |"Prakritik Maha Pralaya" (the cosmic phenomenon of "dissolution") occurs when 'Ananta' becomes 'Sesha', infinity becomes zero and Yog-maya (the ever changing and evolving [mayamayi or transient] Material Universe or Manifested Cosmos) becomes Yog-nidra (the big sleep). Therefore, in a manner of speaking, it is said that when Adishesa 'uncoils', time (kaal, kaalah) moves forward and creation takes place. When Adisesha/ Śeṣanāga 'coils back', the universe ceases to exist. ("Shesha" in Sanskrit texts, especially those relating to mathematical calculation, also implies the "remainder" - that which remains when all else ceases to exist.)

~ So, very likely, what is today known as the "Shiv Ling" was actually a depiction of this above phenomenon ~ the "Cosmic Egg" (Brhmaanda or Brahmaanda) and "Garbhodaka Ocean" that lies at the bottom of the Brahmaand. | If we can understand this, we will also understand what the concept of "Hiranyagarbha" means. (~ Maybe the Gupta emperors too installed the "Shiv Ling" - to depict the cosmic phenomenon of "creation" and "dissolution".) ... However, with the passage of time - possibly after the decline of the Gupta era - due to various interpolations, extrapolations, mistranslations and so on, other connotations have come about. Just like Purushaactually means: Cosmic Energy or Primal Creative Energy, although now it has come to mean: a male. | We can only marvel at the ancients' immense knowledge and vaulting imagination. They could - so effortlessly - simplify complex science to such an extent ~ that even a child could easily grasp it. Amazing, indeed!

Vadavagni is a form of Agni (fire) - depicted as a mare that breathes fire. It is believed that it is the escape of this 'fire' (Vadavagni) from under the 'ocean' (very likely the 'ocean of Garbha'), which will finally consume the current cycle of creation and prepare the universe (Brhmaanda or Brahmaanda - the "Cosmic Egg") for the next cycle of creation. | Vadavagni is (believed to be) located beneath the 'ocean' (possibly the 'ocean of Garbha') and is allegorically depicted with the face of a mare. Apparently, mists and clouds are formed due to the activity of Vadavagni (below the 'ocean' - the 'ocean of Garbha'). This also prevents the 'ocean' from consuming the Material Universe or Manifested Cosmos. ~ This probably means: Vadavagni (allegory for a tremendous force/energy and/or some kind of Cosmic Fire?) causes the (metaphoric) 'ocean water' to 'evaporate' and turn into 'mist' ~ thus preventing the 'ocean' from ever overflowing on to the Material Universe or Manifested Cosmos. ~ It is said that just before 'Prakritik Maha Pralaya' (cataclysmic events - Nataraj - the symbolic dance of "dissolution" - heralding the cosmic phenomenon of "dissolution"), Vadavagni will stop doing this, causing the 'ocean' to expand and submerge the Universe or Manifested Cosmos. ~ At this time, Vadavagni will burst forth as (in the form of) 'volcanoes' from under the 'ocean' and escape (~ i.e. the cosmic fire of dissolution will [gradually] consume the whole of Material Nature or Manifested Cosmos).

BG 11.32: śrī-bhagavān uvāca (The Blessed Lord said): || kālo 'smi loka-kṣaya-kṛt pravṛddho || ~ "Now I am Time (kālo 'smi), the destroyer of all."| Alternatively: "Time I am, the shatterer of worlds." ~ He is referring to the cosmic phenomenon of "dissolution".

[Note: The first atomic bomb was detonated on July 16, 1945, in the Trinity test in New Mexico. Oppenheimer, often called the "father of the atomic bomb", remarked later that it brought to (his) mind words from the Bhagavad-Gita. He interpreted it as: "Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds." ~ We knew the world would not be the same. A few people laughed, a few people cried, most people were silent. ... I suppose we all thought that one way or another.] 

Thus, BG 10.33: || aham evākṣayaḥ kālo || ~ "I am also inexhaustible time." 

And, BG 10.34: || mṛtyuḥ sarva-haraś cāham udbhavaś ca bhaviṣyatām || ~ "I am all-consuming time, and I am the generating principle/cause/energy of all that is yet to be." (~ Alternatively: "I am all-consuming time, and I am too the birth of all that shall come into being.") 

[Note: The above verses could be a reference to the final 'Preserver-Rejuvenator' - the Kalkiḥ-avatar or Kalkiḥ Maitreya. ~ Unlike the Krishn-avatar - a 'Purna-Avatar' (~ one in whom divinity is manifested fully, indicative of all 16 divine attributes), the final 'Preserver-Rejuvenator' is addressed as 'Jagat-patih' - Sovereign/Monarch of the Cosmos or Lord of Creation. |Kalkiḥ, also referred to as Kalkin and Kalaki, is often a metaphor for "Eternity" or "Time". (Time is Kaalah in Sanskrit.) ~ [Kaliyug is the shortest of all eras/yugs. The later part, or the end of Kaliyug, is termed as the ghor kaliyug phase - the metaphoric 'Iron Age' of stagnation, ignorance and decay.] ~ This maha-avatar will "close" Kaliyug, set the stage for the next 'Maha-Yug' to manifest... and will also be the avatar of the next 'Maha-Yug' - which will commence with the advent of a whole new era/yug - the next Sat Yug or Satya Yug (~ the metaphoric "Golden Age" of progress, positivity, fresh thinking, prosperity, vigour, rejuvenation, etc). ... There will be no further individual avatars after the coming of the final 'Preserver-Rejuvenator'. |Avatar comes from the Sanskrit 'Avatirna'. Avatar = manifestation.] 

BG 10.33: || akṣarāṇām a-kāro 'smi || ~ "Of letters I am the letter 'A'."| Krishn is also referring to the latent spiritual energy lying dormant at the base of the spine - the kundalini energy

~ The sound 'A' is the foremost of the sounds. All the alphabets begin with the letter 'A', thus is number 1. Before number one it can only be zero (shunya). ~ Zero (shunya) is the potential Creation, the Cosmic Egg, which would manifest in due course of time, and Fire (Cosmic Fire/Light Divine/Divine Effulgence or the impersonal, unmanifested'Brahm-jyotih' / 'Aadi Shakti' - Primal Creative Energy) is the basis for such manifestation. | All the planes of existence are the result of the work of Agni (Cosmic Light or Light Divine - the impersonal, unmanifested Absolute OM). Agni transforms; transforms that which is subtle to gross and also transforms the gross to subtle. In the beginning it is from subtle to gross and later from gross to subtle. The evolution and involution is the work of Agni. ~ The whole creation-related work commences from Agni, and Agni is the one who emerges from the unfamiliar to the known as the Cosmic Bang - indicative of the commencement of the cosmic phenomenon of "Creation". ~ Thus, it is probably said: Brahma emerged from the Cosmic Egg due to the Cosmic Bang. | The dynamism in us is also Fire. ~ The Kundalini 'Fire' causes enlightenment of the brain cells. But enflaming the Kundalini 'Fire' requires service to the fellow beings, to the society (steadfast, selfless/nishkam service or action... that contributes towards a better society.) One has to dedicate oneself to nishkam karm - without which the Kundalini 'Fire' is not ignited. |Agni: exists as Cosmic Fire, Solar Fire and as Frictional Fire. |In the sacrum bone (a large, triangular bone) at the base of the spine there exists a subtle and dormant coil of spiritual energy known as the kundalini.| The Kundalini Fire is Frictional Fire, when it is below the diaphragm. When it is above the diaphragm, it is already Solar Fire, and when it reaches the brain, it is Electric Fire (brilliant white). As one progresses regularly (in nishkam karm), the brilliance of the 'Golden disc' (Solar Fire) grows. Just as the morning Sun who is Golden in colour grows to brilliant white, the 'Golden disc/chakra' visualized at the eyebrow centre (ajna chakra - the 6th chakra) rises to Ajnea center/chakra and shines forth like a diamond disc/chakra. ... This is the final state of the Kundalini 'Fire'. ~ When this 'chakra' opens, it is deemed as the opening of the (symbolic) Third Eye. 

The sixth chakra, the third eye chakra, is located in the center of the forehead above the eyebrows. The orientation is self-reflection and the main function is seeing, cognizance and accurate interpretation. In this chakra, an individual aims to open his or her internal wisdom and see at a deeper, more perceptive level. One can do this though the third eye centerwhich is located between the eyes and is the organ for inner perception. Opening the third eye allows an individual to see the big picture, transcend egocentricity, and find the deeper meaning inherent in all things (para vidya). As inner sight develops, illusions disappear, clarity begins, and consciousness (cit) extends yet another step beyond what was available through the lower five chakras alone. As an individual makes his or her way up from the root chakra and out the crown of the head (sahasrara), he or she is gaining insight and delving deeper into his or her internal wisdom. And so, a person's actions become not only significant and purposeful, but also thoughtful. This road to thoughtful action is cognizance and accurate interpretation, insight - it guides an individual towards responding and acting appropriately (~ the path of "dharma" and "nishkam karm-yog"). 

~Chakras are centers of Prāṇa, life-force, or vital energy. Chakras correspond to vital points in the physical body i.e. major plexuses of arteries, veins and nerves. The 7 Chakrasare the energy centers in our body in which energy flows through. ~ Kundalini is vital for all the 7 Chakras (centers of Prāṇa, life-force, or vital energy) to be fully'awakened'. ~ And this happens when the latent spiritual energy lying dormant at the base of the spine - kundalini - reaches the 7thchakra - the Sahasrara or crown chakra (the highest chakra). ~ This is the chakra of (symbolic) one thousand petals. |The symbolic crown jewel.

............................................................

The Gayatri Mantra, also known as Savitr Mantra, is the greatest mantra (spiritual experience or self-reflection - to connect with the Higher Self (universal consciousness); not ritualistic or mechanical chant). | A 24-syllable hymn from the Rig Veda, it is one of the most auspicious and oldest of mantras. | The auspicious Gayatri Mantra is considered one of the most universal mantra, invoking the impersonal (nirguna - without qualities), unmanifested (avyaktah, nirakaar - without form) Absolute OM/Brahmn (~ Cosmic Light, Light Divine or Divine Effulgence - the impersonal Brahm-jyotih or 'Aadi Shakti') as the principle of knowledge and the illumination of the primordial sun.

This auspicious mantra also invokes the saguna, vyaktah, sakaar (manifested + with qualities) 'Brahm-putri' - the Almighty. [Putri = manifestation, embodiment, personification.]

~ BG 10.35: || gāyatrī chandasām aham || ~ "I am Gayatri mantra among the Vedic mantras."

Primordial Sun = Impersonal (nirguna - without qualities), unmanifested (niraakar, avyaktah - without form) Absolute OM or Absolute Brahmn.

Savitr = the Sun-god (Surya-dev) - the majestic effulgent Sun-god (Sūrya, Aaditya). ~ In other words: Pratyaksh-Brahmn.

Pratyaksh = embodiment.

Pratyaksh-Brahmn: since the impersonal, unmanifested Absolute OM (Brahmn) is Cosmic Light or Light Divine - Divine Effulgence - it cannot be seen with mortal eyes. | And so, the Sun-god or Surya-dev is considered to be its embodiment. | In other words: through the majestic, effulgent Sun-god (Surya-dev) we can (in a manner of speaking) 'see' the otherwise impersonal (nirguna - without qualities) and unmanifested(avyaktah, narakaar - without form) Absolute Brahmn ~ Cosmic Light, Light Divine or Divine Effulgence - Brahm-jyotihor 'Aadi Shakti' - Primal Creative Energy. 

~ Thus, the majestic Sun-god symbolizes the one self-effulgent impersonal, unmanifested Absolute OM or Absolute Brahmn (~ Cosmic Light, Light Divine, Divine Effulgence - Brahm-jyotih or 'Aadi Shakti'). | The Sun-god also stands for an embodiment of knowledge, prosperity, spiritual light, wisdom, intellectual illumination, culture, creativity, and so on.

BG 15.12: || yadaadityagatam tejo jagad bhaasayate'khilam yacchandramasi  yacchaagnau tattejo viddhi maamakam|| ~ "That  light which, residing in the sun, illumines the whole world, that which is in the moon and in the fire - know that light as Mine."

"You shine, all living things emerge. You disappear, they go to rest. Recognizing our innocence, O golden-haired Sun, arise; let each day be better than the last." ~  the Rig Veda.

~ Technically speaking, what promotes life is the energy of the sun. The rays from the sun not only support life, but the rays of the sun are indeed the source of life itself. It enhances the efficacy of the life principles, including one's body, mind and soul. ~ When one prays to or meditates upon the sun, one is also visualizing the sun's rays streaming forth into one's body, mind and soul... guiding him or her through the path of illumination (sūrya-dvāreṇa).

The Gayatri Mantra: || AUM Bhur Bhuvah Svaha Tat Savitur Varenyam Bhargo Devasya Dhimahi Dhiyoyonah Prachodayat||

Pronounced: || OHM BUR BOO-VAH SVA-HA TAHT SAH-VEE-TOOR VAHR-EHN-YUM BHAHR-GO DEH-VAHS-YAH DEE-MAH-HEE DEE-YOH YOHN-AH PRAH-CHOD-DAH-YAHT ||

Meaning: AUM. Let the light of Savitri (the goddess of dawn and embodiment of the sun - the path of illumination (sūrya-dvāreṇa) = Universal Consciousness or Higher Self) enter into My Spirit and illumine My mind and enrich My Spirit (individual consciousness or mere Self).

~ This, in a nutshell, explains 'Self-realization' or Paramatma-realization~ the realization of the Infinite'I' within the finite'I' ~ the confluence or convergence of the individual consciousness (mere Self or jiva-atma) with the Universal Consciousness (Higher Self or Supersoul/Atman - the Param-atma) ~ leading to an individual's spiritual and intellectual awakening and evolution - one's progress as a human being. ~ In other words: the journey towards inner perfection and Supreme Enlightenment.| Tagore expressed it as: 'aamar modhye tomaar prakash tai ato madhur'. ['Aanandamayi Chaitanyamayi': link.]


~ BG 10.35: || gāyatrī chandasām aham || ~ "I am Gayatri mantra among the Vedic mantras."

This is because Goddess Sarasvati is the manifestation of the impersonal, unmanifested Absolute OM or Absolute Brahmn.

She, as the manifested OM/Brahmn ~ Para Brahmn - the Almighty (~ Cosmic Entity - Mahat or Ishvari) is thus, Brahma-putri. ['Putri' = manifestation, embodiment or personification.] ~ She is the Absolute Truth (Sat/Satya) - the eternal divine person/entity.

Devi Sarasvati is the deity (manifestation, personification or embodiment) of Gayatri (refer the above passages); the fountain of fine arts and science. She is also Savitri - the goddess of dawn - who dispels the fog of ignorance and confusion... and lights the diya or lamp of Eternal Knowledge (non-transient knowledge) - i.e. the wisdom of knowledge or the light of wisdom - enlightenment - para vidya ~ the ability to see the big picture, transcend egocentricity, and find the deeper meaning inherent in all things. ['Mere Mann Ke... Var de Var de': link.] ~ This happens as inner sight develops; then illusions disappear, clarity begins, and consciousness (individual consciousness/sentience - the mere Self) extends yet another step beyond what was available through the lower five chakras alone. [Rajanikanta Sen's 'Tumi Nirmala Karo': link.] ~ As one makes his or her way up from the root chakra and out the crown of the head, he or she is gaining insight and delving deeper into his or her internal wisdom. Then actions become not only significant and purposeful, but also thoughtful. This road to thoughtful action, is insight(seeing the larger picture): which guides an individual towards responding and acting appropriately. It also adds meaning and depth to his or her lives. [The Sanskrit word sarameans essence and sva means self. Thus, Sarasvati denotes the essence of the self. ~ Possibly indicative of Atman - the Higher Self.]

Goddess Sarasvati is intrinsically associated with flowing water in her role as a goddess of knowledge (not merely text-bookish or transient knowledge - apara vidya) - hence she holds a lotus - the symbol of true (non-transient) or eternal knowledge - para vidya. [Maybe the lotus symbolizes the Sahasrara - refer relevant passages.] ~ Goddess Sarasvati is wisdom personified. | In the Rig Ved, SarasvatI is a river as well as its personification as a goddess. [Veda = The Book of Knowledge/The Book of Enlightenment. Veda (meaning wisdom, knowledge) comes from the root "vid" - to know. Veda has in turn given rise to "Vidya", which also means: knowledge.]

Goddess Sarasvati is depicted as extremely fair-complexioned and clad in *pristine white attire. ~ This could be indicative of the highly revered Puṇḍarīka (Pundarika) or Pankaja/Svetakamala/DhavalaH kamala or Shubhra Kamala - "pure white lotus". [Dhavala is pronounced as DA wahl.] | Pure white symbolizes pristine - purity of mind (supreme or highest enlightenment or the stage where nirvana is attained), calmness, serenity and spiritual perfection + embodiment of true (non-transient) eternal knowledge (Para Vidya). It also signifies tranquility. | Pure white lotus could also be a reference to the final state of kundalini energy - when it reaches the Sahasrara - the 7th chakra or crown chakra - the highest chakra, signifying the light of wisdom = Surya-Kotti Samaprabha; as radiant as a million Suns.

*White reflects all the colours of the visible light spectrum to the eyes. The sum of all the colours of light add up to white. Thus, white is the blending of all colours. [White light is made up primarily of red, blue and green.] ~ Light appears colorless or white. Sunlight is white light that is composed of all the colours of the spectrum. A rainbow is proof. We can't see the colours of sunlight except when atmospheric conditions bend the light rays and create a rainbow. One can also use a prism to demonstrate this. Thus, white is a combination of all colours, i.e. white reflects all colours. White objects, tend to reflect all types of light equally well, and tend to reflect most of the light falling on it. ~ An object we call 'white' reflects all wavelengths of visible light and therefore could be considered all-coloured. White light contains light of all frequencies. In that sense, white is a combination of all colours. [~ Rainbow is called Meghdhanush, Ramdhanu or Indra-dhanuSha in Sanskrit. It symbolizes hope. | Indra-dhanuSha = bow of Lord Indra, king of the gods (Devas - Higher Beings). The Almighty is Mahendra - Lord of Indra.]

Sarasvati Mantra, 'Pranam mantra' or Sanskrit prayer: || OM Sarasvati Mahabhagey, Vidye Kamalalochaney | Viswarupey Vishalakshi, Vidyam Dehi Namohastutey || Jaya Jaya Devi, Charachara Sharey, Kuchayuga Shobhita, Mukta Haarey | Veena Ranjita, Pustaka Hastey, Bhagavati Bharati, Devi Namohastutey || ~ O, the great Goddess Sarasvati, the lotus-eyed personified knowledge... O, large-eyed Goddess, taking the form of the whole universe (~ large-eyed in the Vishwaroop or Viraat-roop - the Universal Form, or [maybe] the Primal Form), thou shower us with all the powers and glories of all knowledge that exist. | Salutations to the Goddess who is wisdom personified, who is the Goddess of knowledge and arts, whose essence is all-pervading; who is serene and adorned in radiant white attire (embellished with white flowers and white pearls); who is bearer of the musical instrument (veena) and a book (pustak); O wise and benevolent Goddess Sarasvati (Bharati - the Goddess of fine speech/persuasive powers/ vāk or vāc), we pay our respectful obeisance unto you. May you bless and guide us. 

The'Sarasvati Vandana Mantra' (for guidance and the wisdom of knowledge, or the light of wisdom: link) ||"May Goddess Sarasvati, who is fair like the jasmine-coloured moon, and whose pure white garland shines like (i.e is as bright as) frosted dew drops [dew is the purest form of water]; who is adorned in radiant white attire, on whose beautiful arm rests the veena, and whose throne is a pure white lotus blooming in a wide stretch of water (neluhini); who is surrounded and respected by the Gods, bless us. May the goddess fully remove our lethargy, sluggishness, and ignorance." || ~ It is believed that Goddess Sarasvati endows humans with the powers of fine speech/vāk (persuasive powers) and the wisdom of knowledge (~ the ability to discriminate between the enduring or the essentials and evanescent/trivial or between positive and negative aspects - like the swan). Her symbolic four hands represent four aspects of human personality in learning: mind, intellect, alertness and self. She plays the music of compassion, wisdom, assimilation, universal love and life on a string instrument called the veena. | The goddess is not associated with transient or trivial aspects - thus the imagery of a swan.

The light of wisdom = Surya-Kotti Samaprabha; as radiant as a million Suns. |  Shri Ganesh represents a set of qualities: great retention power or vast intelligence (as symbolized by the elephant head - implying elephant's memory). The elephant-head: represents calm disposition, intelligence, perceptiveness, knowledge and wisdom as well as the wisdom of knowledge. [The light of wisdom = Surya-Kotti Samaprabha; as radiant as a million Suns.] | The big head = think big.

~ Talent, steadfast effort or endeavour (towards a positive deed, such as: contributing to the society) aught to be nurtured, appreciated and acknowledged. These make the world a better place. ~ It is also important to develop a broader vision or to take a holistic view... so as to not miss out on the enduring or essential aspects. ~ However, if the mind is focused on the ephemeral, then the mind lacks the mental maturity and intellectual discrimination (of the swan) to distinguish between the positive and negative aspects as well as between the eternal (enduring or essential) and the evanescent (unimportant, superficial or trivial). Being enthralled in superficial nitpicking and/or mixing up two entities that are not similar or are completely different = inability to understand the bigger picture. ~ This in turn reflects on society and civilization (i.e. on societal or civilizational values and ideals). ~ Excessive focus on unimportant or transient aspects cloud the mind and intellect; one then tends to overlook the enduring i.e. not perceive, understand or experience the larger picture (~ as symbolized by the swan metaphor). 

BG 10.27: || airāvataḿ gajendrāṇāḿ || ~ "Of lordly elephants I am Airavata". ~ This could be a reference to Sri Ganesh. [~ Sri Ganesh represents a set of qualities.]

~ The small eyes = concentration. The small mouth and the bent trunk (Vakra-Tunndda) = less noise, more efficiency (complete opposite of 'empty vessels makes the most noise'). The bent trunk indicates: one who is not given to boasting or talking unnecessarily; in other words: non-ignorant. The big elephant ears = great listening ability ('listening', and not merely 'hearing'). The single tusk = retaining the good and discarding the rest. Also: non-extravagant. The big body (Maha-Kaaya) = immense strength: to stop all obstacles - in the path of good deeds or actions. The large stomach = not constricted; digests or accepts everything (all that life has to offer) without being affected. The swift mooshika-vahana(the 'mooshika' or the mouse as 'vehicle') - represents: swiftness(obviously), but a mooshika finds its way through all kinds of terrains and tears down all sorts of obstacles (vighn) - with its sharp teeth. ~ And, since the mooshika is his 'vaahan' or vehicle - the latter remains under control and cannot take Sri Ganesh for a ride. In other words: lack of negative greed or avoidable desire. The parasu or axe = to strike down all obstacles in the path of good (positive) deeds. The rope + lotus = to pull an individual closer to the goal + to pull him or her away from negative aspects, negative thinking, and the like. [*A lotus grows in muddy water yet remains untouched by it.] The palm in abhaya mudra = blessings + reassurance. The tasty Modakas = the rewards/fruition of one's single-minded efforts [karm-yog.] All that Sri Ganesh symbolizes can achieve any goal or purpose: Nirvighnam Kuru Me Deva Sarva-Kaaryessu Sarvadaa. | When one prays to Sri Ganesh, one is essentially praying to be bestowed with all these traits or qualities so as to be able to surmount all odds and impediments... and complete a good deed or task successfully always (Sarvadaa). Hence, Sri Ganesh is worshiped before the commencement of any auspicious task. | Gan + esh = Ganesh. ~ 'Gan' can indicate people (gana) or even good traits (guna). 'Esh' = the best of or the master of. |Note:Lord Buddha is depicted with large ears, while the similarity between Sri Ganesh and the Laughing Buddha is remarkable. Goddess Sarasvati is also a prominent figure in Buddhist iconography.]

*The lotus in muddy water is not to be misconstrued as: a lotus flower blooms brightly if more mud is poured on it. | The roots of a lotus are in the mud (muddy water), the stemgrows up through the (muddy) water, and the heavily scentedflower lies pristine above the water,basking in the sunlight. ~ The lotus remains Nirmal (pristine), even though rooted in the muddiest waters. ~ This pattern of growth signifies the progress of the soul from the primeval mud of materialism (attachment to sense objects - glory, fame, accolades, etc), through the waters of experience, and into the bright sunshine of enlightenment (the wisdom of knowledge). ~ The lotus represents a self-realized soul (one who has achieved inner perfection); the muddy water represents sense objects. The lotus remaining Nirmal(pristine), even though rooted in the muddiest waters - represents non-attachment to sense objects and the dharmic freedom of inner detachment (Jeevan Mukta). ~ It is the mark of an enlightened, higher soul (mahatmanah). The spirit of such persons is pristine (Nirmal). And so, the concept of caraṇa-ambujam/caraṇa-ambhojam or "lotus feet" and kara-puṣkara or "lotus-palm" has come about. | The goals and objectives is important ~ so long there is non-attachment to sense objects (personal accolades, fame, etc) and so long the means (ingenuity, etc) is a step towards the greater cause - the larger or collective good ~ e.g. working towards creating a better (progressive and vibrant) society. |The lotus flower and the swan (hamsah) are (thus) embodiments of nishkam karm and inner detachment (Jeevan Mukta - the dharmic freedom of inner detachment) and exemplify a true yogi - a real ascetic (hamsan) or sanyaasi (~ it indicates inner detachment or jeevan mukt - not renunciation). ~ Such a one is a true yogi - a nishkam karm-yogi. Such a yogi is called hamsah - the swan. | Krishn is also known as Hamsah - the swan; his was the highest dharmic mission. Humanity was faced with bigger and mightier odds/challenges/impediments in Dvapar than in Treta, but this did not deter him. He was clear-eyed (non-deluded) and steered the course through tortuous events ~ to put things on firmer ground (upward trajectory or a positive turnaround).|The lotus is an aquatic perennial plant. The lotus flower is considered divine and represents the purity of the mind (highest enlightenment) and consciousness (inner perfection). Lotus is the embodiment of spiritual perfection. It defines the capacity of the soul to expand and embrace the beauty of life with a clear conscience. ~ This magnificent flower emerges from the muddy waters of a pond or lake, but still remains unstained by the mud surrounding it in the pond or lake. This unique quality of the flower is believed to represent a higher soul (mahatmanah), beauty (sundar = sattvic traits - auspiciousness, goodness, non-selfish and devoid of narrow perspective; in other words: inner perfection) and transcendence. The quality of the lotus flower to remain unblemished by the water and mud of the pond, where it grows, is compared with the quality of a wise and spiritually enlightened person, who performs his or her duty without any material desire. This quality of detachment enables one to remain unaffected by all worldly pleasures and gain, and achieve spiritual perfection. The lotus bud is compared with a folded soul, which has the ability to blossom or awaken to realize the divine truth. ~ This symbolizes the journey from the darkness of ignorance to the light or spiritual illumination. (Asato maa Sat-gamaya|Tamaso maa Jyotir-gamaya ~ From delusion or illusion lead us to the Truth [eternal/non-transient knowledge or highest enlightenment - para vidya) | From darkness/ignorance or confusion lead us towards light and wisdom...)

Airavata is said to have been white in colour. 

Modern Burma (also: Burmah, now Myanmar) was actually Brahm Desha or the 'Land of Brahm'. |The region between the Sindhu and SarasvatI rivers too were regarded by the Rig Vedic people as the holiest of holy grounds - Brahmadesa. |Sri Hayagriva or the Hayagriva-avatar is the male equivalent of DeviSarasvati. [Putra or Putri indicates manifestation, personification or embodiment.]

... The major river in Burma has now been anglicized to Irrawaddy, but is pronounced very differently in the Burmese tongue as Ayeyarawati. This is because: it is derived from the Sanskrit name Airavata (~ maybe it issued forth from a mountain snout or rock shaped like the mouth of an elephant). | Besides, the Acirvatiwas an ancient river flowing through what are now Nepal and the northern portion of Uttar Pradesh. The Aciravati was also known as the Ajiravati or the Airavati. The Chinese pilgrim Yuan Chwang knew it as A-chi-lo. Jain texts mention it as Eravai. ~ The ancient city of Sravasti stood on the western bank of the Aciravati. It was one of the five great rivers that constituted the Ganges group of rivers. It was one of the sacred rivers of the Buddhist midland. [This system of five rivers too probably issued from a mountain snout or rock shaped like the mouth of an elephant.]

~ In Thailand whitish-gray elephants are found. Elephants are considered special in Thailand, and white-hued elephants in particular are regarded as sacred and lucky because they are associated with the birth of the Buddha. Legend holds that the more white-hued elephants found during a king's reign, the more glorious and prosperous his reign will be. Today, they are commonly thought to bring good luck. Most white-hued elephants are not truly white or albino, but are paler in colour than other elephants.

...........................................................

BG 10.21: || jyotisam ravir amsuman || ~ "of radiance I am the radiant sun" (ravir amsuman). ~ It is a reference to the majestic Sun-god [Pratyaksh-Brahmn] as well as to the impersonal (nirguna - without qualities), unmanifested (avyaktah, niraakar - without form) Brahmn-jyoti. (Refer the passages on the Gayatri Mantra). ~ Goddess Sarasvati is the manifestation of both - the majestic Sun-god [Pratyaksh-Brahmn] + the impersonal (nirguna - without qualities), unmanifested (avyaktah, niraakar - without form) Brahm-jyoti (Absolute OM).| In this verse, Krishn is also referring to the Summer Solstice (Sanskrit: Dakshinayana - June 21 or 22.) ~ On this day even Druids celebrate. | Sudarshan Vasudev Dhanvantari - the Supreme Druid - arrives to stem the societal 'churn'/manthan whenever it becomes too great, i.e. whenever it becomes a bane. ~ Dhanvantari, the Supreme Druid, stabilizes and re-energizes by administering aoushata (cure, remedy) - so that human society can (gradually) regain its health and vigour. [Rudra-Siva (Vaidyanatha - Lord of Remedies) and Dhanvantari (the Supreme Druid) are non-different.] | ~ This verse is essentially indicative of Goddess Sarasvati. The saguna, unmanifested Trimurti of 'Sarasvati-Lakshmi-Parvati' (Rudra-Siva) is non-different.'Ogo Nadi Apon Bege': link. ~ 'Ogo Nadi apon bege pagal paraa ('flowing rapidly' - pra-sasre; 'moving faultlessly' - akuvari) path-e path-e bahir hoye apon haara (Rudra-Siva, Sadasiva or Bhola Nath...)'

**Dakshinayana or Pitrayana is referred to as Karka Sankraman or Karkataka Sankranti. On this day, Sun enters into Karka rashi (Cancer) [Tropic of Cancer]. Dakshinayana or Karka Sankraman is a time for performing Pitru tarpan - to pay respect to Pitr Devatas (ancestors), it is also a time for performing charitable deeds, worshipping Lord Vishnu (the impersonal, unmanifestedcosmic Vishnu - the Sustainer/Maintainer or Preserver aspect of the impersonal, unmanifested Absolute OM); chanting Vishnusahasranama stotram ("the thousand names of Vishnu"), chanting Lalita Sahasranama stotram ("the thousand names of Goddess Lalita" - the saguna, manifested Goddess Aadi Shakti; in other words: Goddess Sarasvati); worshipping Lord Varaha (the 3rd avatar of the Dasavatara, the supreme form of *Goddess Narayani - the manifested saguna Vishnu/Narayan - Goddess Sarasvati.) ~ Incidentally, the current kalpa is known as "Svhetavaraha Kalpa". (Svheta = white. Varaha = the one-tusked great boar.) |*Goddess Sarasvati/Narayani is also the Stabilizer/Preserver/Maintainer of all the worlds; thus She is depicted as Lakshmi alongside the impersonal, unmanifestedcosmic Vishnu - the Sustainer/Maintainer or Preserver aspect of the impersonal (nirguna - without qualities), unmanifested (avyaktah, niraakar - without form) Absolute OM - Cosmic Light or Light Divine. |In Sanskrit, sahasra means "a thousand" and nāma(nominative, the stem is nāman) means, "name". Nāman = to pay obeisance to.

BG 10.27: || uccaiḥśravasam aśvānāḿ viddhi mām amṛtodbhavam airāvataḿ gajendrāṇāḿ narāṇāḿ ca narādhipam || ~ "Of horses know Me to be Uccaiḥśravā, of lordly elephants I am Airāvata, and among humans I am the monarch." (Cakravartin) 

|| uccaiḥśravasam aśvānāḿ viddhi mām amṛtodbhavam || ~ Uccaiḥśravā (Uchchaihshravas): the snow-white and seven-headed flying horse, considered the best of horses and king of horses, produced/created during the churning of the ocean ('samudra-manthan' or 'sagar-manthan' i.e. kshira-sagara manthan - for 'amrit'). 

Flying horse: peacock + swan imagery. ['Ogo Kajal Nayona Harini': link. | Tagore's 'Aji Jhara Jhara Mukharo Badoro Diney': link. ('... oi balaka-r pathakhani nitey chiney...' balaka = white goose or hamsa. |'Meghamallar shara dinaman | baje jharonaro (spring, fountain) gaan...' is a reference to Goddess Sarasvati).]

Here 'amrit' is a metaphor. It refers to new, fresh or positive aspects that emerge or evolve out of societal churn (~ the proverbial 'samudra-manthan' or 'sagar-manthan' - kṣīroda, kṣīradhi or Ksheera Sagara manthan). |Lord Rudra-Siva (as 'Neelkanth' - the allegorical 'blue-throated one') accepts the 'toxic aspects' or negativism resulting out of 'societal manthan/churn' - for the good of humanity/mankind ~ to allow it to evolve, so that a better and vibrant society emerges. |Negativism (referred to as halahala or kaalkoot) = the metaphoric 'toxic aspects' (such as: barbs, bile, confusion, ignorance, delusion, illusion, hopelessness, retrogressiveness, vanity, hubris, pettiness, inertia, apathy or indifference, narrow-mindedness, triviality, selfish concerns, and so on) which - if allowed to accumulate - would lead to stagnation and societal degeneration (i.e. degeneration or decline in civilizational values and ideals). ~ Lord Rudra-Siva's actions helps to curb these negative aspects... thereby laying the foundations for a rejuvenated and vibrant society to emerge.  

The River SarasvatI is (also) called "she with seven sisters" (saptasvasā). | The 'Sapta Sindhu' ("seven rivers" - Vedic Sapta Sindhavaḥ; "Sindhu" means river, stream or ocean in Sanskrit) refers to the rivers SuturI (Sutlej), VipASa (Beas), AsiknI (Chenab), ParuSNI (Ravi), VitastA (Jhelum), Sindhu (Indus) andprobably KubhA. | ~ And this should probably explain 'the snow-white and seven-headed flying horse', considered the best of horses and king of horses (unicorn - the one-horned horse - symbolizing rarity and uniqueness). |[One-horned = ekashringa. Even Sri Ganesh is depicted with a single tusk.] It is imagery - to denote rarity or uniqueness (~ being the only one of its kind, i.e. unparalleled or extraordinary). | On a side note: 'Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs' ~ maybe, this fairy tale alludes to SarasvatI and the seven rivers - "she with seven sisters" (saptasvasa). ~ The story, though, may have undergone several variations and/or is largely unrelated.

|| narāṇāḿ ca narādhipam|| ~ "and among humans I am the monarch." (Cakravartin) | Cakravartin = a sagacious and sensible consensus-builder, someone with stature and a broader outlook/vision, an able leader and administrator + guardian (protector/preserver and guide) ~ kartaa (the doer), maargah (the path), and neyah (the guide).

**The month of Śrāvaṇa (Shravan) begins with the Sun's entry into Leo. | During Dakshinayana or Pitrayana (the Summer Solstice - June 21st or 22nd) the Sun enters into Karkataka (Karka) rashi (Cancer). [Tropic of Cancer.] Hence, Dakshinayanam or Pitrayana is also referred to as Karka Sankraman or Karkataka Sankranti. [Sankranti means transition; transmigration of the Sun from one Rāshi (constellation of the zodiac in Indian astronomy) to the next.] |Śrāvaṇa is the fifth month of the Hindu year, beginning in late July and ending in the third week of August. Śrāvaṇa begins with the Sun's entry into Leo. [Dates of Janmashtami are decided by the star constellations Ashtami and Rohini.] | In the traditional lunar calendars, Śrāvaṇa begins on the new moon and is the fifth month of the year. ~ The Shravan masa vratam is the most auspicious of all vrata-s. ~ Shravan masa (the month of Shravan) is the best time to worship Lord Vishnu (~ the impersonal, unmanifestedcosmic Vishnu - the Sustainer/Maintainer or Preserver aspect of the impersonal, unmanifested Absolute OM/Brahmn). ~ People observing this vratam take meals once a day (eka bhukta bhojan) or Naktha Vratam (keeping fast during daytime and taking prasad or fruits or a light meal at night). Besides Lord Vishnu, Goddess Lakshmi is also worshiped. [~ Goddess Sarasvati/Narayani is also the Stabilizer/Preserver/Maintainer of all the worlds; thus She is depicted asLakshmi alongside the impersonal, unmanifested cosmic Vishnu(the Sustainer/Maintainer or Preserver aspect of the Absolute OM/Brahmn).] Goddess Lakshmi represents not only material wealth, but also the wealth of grains, courage, valour, wisdom, success, prosperity, well-being and eternal bliss or spiritual contentment of self-realization: sat-cit-ananda. [Though it is mentioned as grains (and unhusked rice is kept near the idol), it means nutrition, healthy and balanced nutrition.] People generally abstain from non-vegetarian food. ~ This is essentially done keeping the season and change of weather in mind. ~ Fruits, milk, etc enhance one's immunity. In the coastal areas... it is thought that most fish spawn during this period and so, abstaining from fishing during Śrāvaṇa (Shravan) will lead to increased availability of fish throughout the year.

BG 10.31: || jhaṣāṇāḿ makaraś cāsmi || ~ "I am the crocodile among the fishes". ~ A crocodile can be associated with patience and precision, but crocodile is makara in Sanskrit. It is associated with Makara Sankranti or Uttarayan (also known as: Pongal) - the most important Sankranti and one of the most auspicious occasions, signifying renewal or re-energizing (~ it is, therefore, regarded as the beginning of an auspicious phase). Sankranti means transition; i.e. transmigration of the Sun from one Rāshi (constellation of the zodiac in Indian astronomy) to the next. ~ Makara Sankranti marks the transition of the Sun into Makara rasi (Capricorn). Scientifically, this day marks the beginning of warmer and longer days compared to the nights; thus the chill of winter in on decline. In other words, Sankranti marks the termination or closure of winter season and beginning of a new harvest or spring season. ~ It is perhaps the only festival or occasion whose date always falls on the same day every year: 14 January, with some exceptions, when the festival is celebrated on 13 January or 15 January (in a leap year). ~ Makara Sankranti marks the arrival of spring in India. ... And the spring season is associated with Krishn; he is the personification of spring. BG 10.35: ||ṛtūnāḿ kusumākaraḥ ||~ "and of seasons I am spring". ~ Shyamsundar Krishn is the personification of spring. The spring season also (symbolically) indicates a new beginning. |Makara Sankranti (or Pongal) marks the beginning of Uttarayan. [This time of year is generally associated with Goddess Sarasvati and Lord Vishnu. | Uttarayan begins from the day of Makara Sankranti - heralding the arrival of spring and marking the beginning of Vasant Panchami (~ also known as Shree Panchami or Sarasvati Puja) - to pay our respect for knowledge and learning (~ non-transient knowledge). |Uttarayan is a combination of two Sanskrit words, 'uttar' meaning northward and 'ayan' meaning movement towards. It celebrates the Sun-god's northward movement. |Makara Sankranti is the day when the majestic Sun-god (Suryadev or Pratyaksh-Brahmn) begins his movement towards the northern hemisphere, and thus it signifies: 'Tamaso mā jyotir gamaya' - may you go higher and higher, towards more and more Light (knowledge, prosperity, spiritual light, wisdom, intellectual illumination, and so on). It is the time to shun negative thinking (downward slide, hopelessness, cynicism, moribund aspects, and so on); positive thinking is re-energizing. ~ The Sun-god stands for an embodiment of knowledge, prosperity, spiritual light, the wisdom of knowledge, intellectual illumination, etc. 

~ Makara Sankranti signifies renewal or new life: to turn away from (symbolic) negativism - confusion, delusion, ignorance, pessimism, and the like... and to begin to create a new life with bright light (within us) - to shine brighter (i.e. inner progress). It is a festival/occasion celebrated all over the country with great fervour, gaiety and kite-flying. [Note: Shankhachil or "Brahminy Kite" is distinctive and contrastingly coloured, with chestnut plumage except for the white head and chest and black wing tips. In India, the noble-natured Brahminy Kite (Haliastur indus) is considered as the contemporary representation of Garuda. ~ The Brahminy Kite (often referred to as the Singapore Bald Eagle) is also called Shankhachil, since the white plumage of this bird is similar to the white of a conch-shell. ~ Brahminy is derived from Brhm (non-transient knowledge or para vidya leading to the wisdom of knowledge - enlightenment).] | Post-Makara Sankranti, when the earth begins to get closer to the sun, the cold winter begins to yield to delightful spring. ~ Vasant Panchami marks the beginning of Vasant or spring, when it is time for every tree, branch and bower to spring to new life with blooms and bursts of colour and fragrance, vibrant in festive display. ~ The flower (kusumā) is a beautiful symbol of life and regeneration. ... Hence, the spring season is Kusumakar (kusumākaraḥ) or Rituraj, the king of all seasons. [BG 10.35: || ṛtūnāḿ kusumākaraḥ || ~ "and of seasons I am spring".]

..........................................................

BG 2.47: || karmaṇy evādhikāras te mā phaleṣu kadācana mā karma-phala-hetur bhūrmā te sańgo 'stv akarmaṇi|| ~ Do your duty (i.e. imbibe the spirit of dharma - steadfast, tangible and effective action... whether individual or collaborative - for the larger good, e.g. collective societal goals, etc) ~ to the best of your ability. Overcome your limitations. Avoid action(s) not backed by adequate thoughtful consideration/cogitation. Instead of indulging in linear thinking (leading to simplistic or utopian 'quick-fix'), cultivate a broader vision or holistic view - to be able to comprehend the larger canvas or bigger picture ~ so as to be able to discriminate/differentiate between the enduring or essentials and transient aspects (superficial or trivial). Concentrate on your convergences. Do not highlight your divergences. Shun lethargy and volubility (loquacity and grandiloquence). Overcome inertia. Imbibe positivism (in attitude and approach). Never lose hope. 

[In other words: Perform your karm (to the best of your ability) - for the larger/collective good... and leave the rest to God. Also: Never give up. 

~ Cultivate mental equanimity: don't be deterred by lack of instant solutions or outcome; try not to feel exalted or carried away by success, accolades, fame, etc; try not to feel dejected or overwhelmed by barbs, bile, impediments, and so on. These are transient aspects. Instead, endeavour to remain cheerful (positive attitude/morale). | Collective shirking of responsibility or being a fence-sitter or being weak-minded is not advisable. Rather, the focus should be on an objective understanding of the genesis, prioritization, longer-term planning (not ad hoc fixes) and performing well-thought out + collaborative, tangible, sustained karm-yog (continuous effort) - as best as possible. Perfunctoryness or platitude is not a substitute. Nor is pessimism, despondency, cynicism, complacency, procrastination, etc advisable. Be a problem-solver; remain steadfast in reaching the collective societal goals/objectives. Develop inner fortitude. ~ Frustration or dejection is for the weak-minded, and serves no purpose. The higher cause (the greater good) and the struggle (continuous effort) alone should inspire the thoughts and actions. One might say that it is simply a matter of doing the dharmic thing (e.g. for a better society to emerge) - not for the results or outcome, not out of desire for personal glory or fame. Nothing more, nothing less. | Krishn's advise is: do your duty. Let your life become one with the cause of the greater whole. That, and that alone.] 

Collaborative karm-yog also provides a national sense of direction, of collective achievement; it helps build character and mettle, otherwise a glorious past is no guarantee for a great future. 

While in Japan Tagore wrote: "The Japanese do not waste their energy in useless screaming and quarreling, and because there is no waste of energy it is not found wanting when required. This calmness and fortitude of body and mind is part of their national self-realization."

~ Krishn was a most extraordinary figure - at a crucial turn of our history. He led by example, and instructed through his own behaviour (acharan) - the mark of a true guru. His was the highest dharmic mission; by his very appearance and diligent efforts, he not only revived/reinvigorated the principles of dharma (dharma-samsthapanarthaya), he also urged (advised) humanity to action (karm) - to duty. To karm yog. | The maha-avatars are Cosmic Teachers and steward-mentors. They impart lessons and advise through their own behaviour and actions. It is for humanity to comprehend the lessons imparted via the words and deeds.| Krishn comes across as ubercool - sorted and approachable, and not some distant authoritative figure.

... The Rig Vedic people regarded the region between the Sindhu and SarasvatI rivers as the holiest of holy grounds - Brahmadesa (possibly a reference to Brahm-putri). BG 10.24: || sarasam asmi sagarah ||They developed a unique world-view blending material prosperity with spirituality and a scientific temper (knowledge, innovation and creativity). Spirituality (not to be misconstrued for ritualism or religiofication) and contentment (sat-cit-ananda) constituted the core of the accepted value system. |Krishn (or for that matter, Chanakya) emphasized on dharma (that which makes a human a human: duties and responsibilities - whether performed individually or collaboratively - resulting in or contributing towards the larger societal goals) and diligent karm-yog (steadfast, well-thought-out action(s) instead of adhoc fixes, ritualism or ceremonialism, platitudes or insouciance).They advised against blinkered or unifocal worldview. It is counterproductive. ... Instead, they exhorted for a wise, holistic understanding and perspective - to make the effort to comprehend the larger picture. E.g. Chanakya viewed Alexander's arrival as an event that could completely transform the essence of the cherished civilizational values and ideals... and thus the ethos of the land. [He did not see Alexander as a marauder or likely plunderer of ancient India's fabled riches.] ~ Krishn too viewed the probability of Duryodhan's ascension to the throne in the same light. ~ Besides, an assortment of destructive weaponry and unnatural humans (sort of human-like humanoids - begotten through advanced genetic engineering and cloning technology) had to be done away with ~ so as to let human civilization progress and flourish naturally, organically and peacefully. | Some genetic defects were found in subsequent generations which too were set right through medical procedures. 'Kaalsarpa Dosha', 'Sarpa Dosha' or 'Nag Dosha' refers to genetic disorder. A genetic disorder is an illness caused by abnormalities in genes or chromosomes. ~ If one observes the shape of DNA, it resembles two snakes coiled together (something we now refer to as: DNA coiled into the double helix structure as a ladder, a twisted rope ladder, or a spiral staircase). In ancient times, the Rishis or Munis (honorifics for highly learned and knowledgeable persons) visualized everything - and thus (euphemistically or maybe symbolically) referred to DNA as 'Sarpa', and any disorder in the DNA was hence termed as 'Sarpa Dosha'. [Dosha = bio-energies found in the body.] ~ Raja Janamajaya/Janamejaya's 'yagna' (euphemism for a 'scientific procedure') to correct 'Kaalsarpa Dosha' or genetic disorder took up twelve years. [~ A big chunk of the 'yagna' etc mentioned in our ancient texts is a reference to one or the other scientific or medical procedure. From the narrative one can figure out what sort of procedure has been indicated. Also, the logo of the Indian Medical Association is self-explanatory.] ~ Parikshit is derived from the word "Parikshan" - indicating a 'test' or 'scientific procedure' (unnatural human?) There is a 'sarpa' involved in the story of Parikshit (Janamejaya's father) - though the story has largely been mistranslated. This 'sarpa' is indicative of some genetic disorder. ... Maybe Rishi Shameek and his son (Shringi) diagnosed this disorder, but were unable to cure it. Perhaps during the procedure itself or while undergoing therapy the disorder aggravated and/or his body reacted negatively to the therapy or medication and thus, Parikshit died (as indicated by 'Takshak hiding himself within an apple'.) | Thereupon, Parikshit's son Janmejaya ascended the throne... and promptly took remedial measures - to correct his own genetic anomaly or disorder ('Sarpa Dosha' or 'Kaalsarpa Dosha'). In all likelihood, Janmejaya probably engaged a number of renowned Maharshis, Rishis and Munis (honorifics for highly knowledgeable and learned persons) - to conduct research and experiments... so as to find a remedy. ~ And this time - after twelve years' of continuous efforts - they were successful.

... Due to the positive actions of Sri Ram and his siblings (which benefited society), Treta accepted humans born due to IVF therapy (~ and this would have helped childless couples too), while Dvapar rejected genetically engineered and cloned humans. | There were two Magadha-s: one on the eastern parts of modern India (consisting of eastern U.P., Bihar, possibly Jharkhand, Bengal, Assam and Odisha) and the other on the western parts of ancient India. ~ The latter (the one on the western parts of ancient India) was also known as Prachya - Eastern Country; maybe east to the Persians, Praesii or Prasioi to the Greeks. Apparently, "The Indus skirts the frontiers of Praesii".There is no River Indus in the eastern parts of modern India.| After the great dharma-yuddha (battle of ideas, principles, vision, inclusivity and progress - for the future of humanity, for a prosperous and vibrant society to emerge) - thisMagadha became the foremost of ancient kingdoms with the new capital Pataliputra, a port city on the banks of the Ganges (~ this'Ganges' could be a reference to ancient India... and not the river). BG 10.31: || srotasām asmi jāhnavī || ~ "and of flowing waters I am the Ganga." [Here, 'Ganga' is a reference to India.] ~ Jarasandh, Chanakya, the Mauryas, the Nandas and later the Guptas were associated with this Magadha - the one on the western parts of ancient India. ~ The Nandas and Mauryas ruled this kingdom. And even the Guptas. ~ The Mauryas built the celebrated Mauryan Empire that spanned far and wide. ~ Lord Krishn founded this city of Pataliputra (~ Palibothraor Palimbothra to the Greeks) - 138 generations before the reign of Chandragupta Maurya. [~ Krishn is Lohitah or Rohit - pale-red in complexion. Pale-red = paTalaH in Sanskrit. Putra = embodiment, personification or manifestation. ~ Lotus is one of the few flowers that has fascinated mankind since time immemorial, with its exotic beauty. Lotus also inspires the human mind to achieve perfection (inner perfection) even in adversities. It is always possible to overcome the tribulations of life to attain fulfillment and perfection (inner perfection). ~ The lotus flower signifies a 'way of life' based on dharma (strong dharmic principles and virtues), purity (inner perfection), dignity, wisdom and harmony. The pale-red lotus is the Supreme Lotus; this lotus is highly revered and signifies the highest deity. Krishn thus embodies or personifies the highest lotus (paTalaH-putra or Pataliputra.) In other words: He is the manifestation of the pale-red lotus. Goddess Lakshmi is also associated with the pale-red lotus. | A pale-red lotus denotes the state of a person's mind; a full-bloomed pale-red lotus means: Supreme or highest Enlightenment or the stage where nirvana is attained - the state of a Buddha. ~ The lotus grows elegantly out of the muddy waters, unaffected and untouched by the mud, so it is considered supreme among all flowers, and is often compared to a person with strong virtues (including selflessness) and dharmic principles.] | The all-conquering Alexander did not cross the Indus region. Rather, his career pretty much came to a halt... after his brief encounter with the mighty king of the Indus region - Raja Paurava (Parvateshvar or Puru; Porus to the Greeks). [Paurava hailed from the Puruvansh (Pauravas) or the Bharatas/Bharatvansh - descendents of Raja Yayati's youngest-born Puru.] ~ The Greeks however had some success ruling as kings in north-western cities such as the one in Takshashila... the decline of which marked the decline in Indian education, thought and structure (direction, innovation, cohesion, etc). However, the so-called Macedonian empire in the east lasted less than ten years after the invasion. | Quintus Curtius mentions that when Alexander squared off against King Porus (also known as: Puru, Paurava or Parvateshvar)... Porus' soldiers were carrying an image of 'Herakles' in their vanguard. ~ Megasthenes' Herakles was not the classical Greek deity per se. ... Megasthenes was reasonably familiar with the places he visited in ancient India. During his travels (as the ambassador of the Seleucids) at the time of the reign of Samrat Chandragupta Maurya of the Maurya Empire/Dynasty (lineage)... Megasthenes came upon an Indian deity, a fascinating figure... and equated him with the classical Greek divinity - Herakles. This Herakles was none other than Krishn or Hari-Krishna. ~ Megasthenes also described an Indian clan called Sourasenoi, who especially worshipped 'Herakles' in their land, and this land had two cities, Methora (Mathura) and Kleisobora, and a navigable river, the Jobares. ... As was common in the ancient period, the Greeks sometimes described foreign deities/gods in terms of their own divinities, and there is little doubt that the 'Sourasenoi' refers to the Shurasenas or Shurasena Yadus ~ a branch of the Yadu clan/kula (descendents of Raja Yayati’s eldest-born Yadu). Therefore, the Shuracena Yadus can be identified with the ancient clan/lineage of Harikula or Harivansh. [The Sarakenoi or Saraceni (late Latin Saracēnus or late Greek Sarakēnos) could actually be the Shuracena Yadus, apart from the Vrishnis. [Vasudev Krishn, the Lord of Mathura and Dvarka, is also known as Varshneya.] | Chanakya very likely was a Vrishni. He is called Brahmana (an honorific + indicative of his personality traits or innate nature) since he trod the path of knowledge, wisdom and enlightenment (the wisdom of knowledge; also: he was a highly learned and knowledgable person). There are some indications that he was a "Dramila" - possibly a word used (by our ancients) to refer to the people who escaped the great deluge that swallowed up Dvarka (Dvaravati). Chanakya probably was born into one such family. |"Pandit" indicates a wise, learned and knowledgable person. "Acharya" means: "He who instructs through his own behavior (acharan)". That is the mark of a true teacher/guru.] |But what is meant by the river Erannoboas? Is it a reference to Chandrabhaga (Chenab)? ~ According to Classical accounts the river Jomanes/Jobares (Yamuna?) flows through Palibothra (Pataliputra - built by Krishn) into the Ganges (this may not be the river, it could be a reference to ancient India) between the towns of Methora (Mathura) and Carisobaras. ~ So, this Methora (Mathura) was very likely part of Prachya - Eastern Country (Praesii or Prasioi to the Greeks). But what is meant by Carisobaras? Here, Jomares or Jomanes (Yamuna) is very likely a metaphor. It could not have been the river by the same name... 'coz the river Yamuna is part of the Madhyadesa or Middle Country region (of the Mahabharata times). ~ And Krishn was not part of this region. | Also, who is Sandrokottas (to the Greeks)? Is it a reference to Chandragupta Maurya? ~ There is also reference to a king called Chandraketu (as the head of the Prabhadraka Kshatriyas). Was this Chandraketu - Sandrokottas to the Greeks? Also, who then was Sandrokyptos? Who was Sasicottus? And who was Xandramas?

...........................................................

The name Basant is from Sanskrit "vasant" meaning "spring", and during this season of the year Basant may be performed at any time of the day or night. The Raagmala gives Basant as a putra(son) of Hindol, also a spring raga. Today it belongs to the Purvi thaat. ~ Performed in slow tempo, this gentle melody depicts quiet joy.

1. Raag Basant by Pt. Jasraj:link. 

2.Raag Hindol by Bharat Ratna Pt. Bhimsen Joshi:link1andlink2.

3.Raag Basant Bahar by Pt. Ajoy Chakraborty: link

4.Raag Basant by Pt. Kumar Gandharva:link.

5. Raag Gauri Basant by Pt. Kumar Gandharva: link

Here are a couple of Bhairavi Bhajans - 'Jo Bhaje Hari ko Saadaa' and 'Prabhuh Kar Sab Dukh Duur' by Bharat Ratna Pt. Bhimsen Joshi: link1and link2.

~ Truly blessed - Sarasvati-putra ~ the great masters of the ever-lasting art. Creative geniuses. Pranam. 

~ A riveting masterpiece rendered impeccably - 'Sarasvati Vandana' (Var De Veena Vadini): link. 


HappyHoli, everyone!!!

.........................................................

The first avatar  - the matsya avatar - appeared as a dolphin. This is allegoric. ~ The matsya-avatar was a wise and benevolent guide through the swirling waters (real and allegoric). During the last great deluge ('Mahajal Pralaya') the specially-built ships (nao) followed the path shown by the 'dolphin'. Incidentally, a Sisumara (dolphin) also represents Sri Vishnu. ... And a dolphin is well-known for guiding ships through turbulent waters. 

There are two aspects to the 'dolphin'. ~ We will understand this, if we comprehend the concept of dualism or duality (Dvaita). 

~ The three cosmic phenomenon of 'Creation (Brahma)-Maintenance (Vishnu)-Dissolution (Shiva)' represents the three aspects of the impersonal unmanifested Absolute OM/Brahmn asthe impersonal, unmanifested Cosmic Trimurti - 'Brahma-Vishnu-Shiva'. ~ Thus, 'Sri Vishnu' is a reference to the 'Maintenance'aspect of the impersonal (nirguna - without qualities) and unmanifested (avyaktah, niraakar - without form) Absolute OM/Brahmn ~ Cosmic Light or Light Divine - the impersonal 'Brahm-jyotih' or 'Aadi-Shakti' - Primal Creative Energy.

The Almighty (Mahat or Ishvari, Para Brahmn or 'Brahma-putri' - manifestation/embodiment/personification [putri] of the Absolute OM/Brahmn) represents the saguna, manifestedTrimurti - 'Sarasvati-Lakshmi-Parvati'. | The Almighty is the higher power embedded in the fabric of the universe (signifying permanent or eternal authority) - and is responsible for its continuing existence and operation.

The cosmic phenomenon of 'Creation-Maintenance-Dissolution' is (therefore) represented by the impersonal, unmanifested'Brahma-Vishnu-Shiva' + manifested'Sarasvati-Lakshmi-Parvati' (Rudra-Siva or Sadashiva) ~ signifying the dualism or duality (the concept of Dvaita). | For purposes of comprehension, the concept of ArdhaNarishvara or ArdhaNarishvari has come about. ||brahmā vishnu sadāshiv *ardhāngī dhārā = To Brahmā, Vishnu and Sadashiva, partial holders of one body. | hansānan garudāsan vrishavāhan sāje = To the One whose vehicle is the swan, the eagle, the bull. | teeno rūp nirakhtā tribhuvan mann mohe (this should explain the 'Mohini-avatar') = The three worlds take delight in seeing Thine three forms | chandan mrigamad sohe bhāle shashidhārī = Anointed with chandan and musk (a reference to deer - symbolizing 'destiny'), forehead adorned with the crescent-moon. | shvetāmbar pītāmbar bāghāmbar ange sanakādik brahmādik bhūtādik sange = To the One clad in white robes, in yellow robes, in tiger skins, worshipped by the Devas, the sages (highly learned and knowledgeable persons) and all beings. | kar ke bīch kamandal chakra trishul dharatā jag karatā jag hartā jag pālan kartā = To the One who holds the waterpot, the sudarshan-chakra, the trident, the Creator, the Sustainer and Dissolver of the world. | brahmā vishnu sadāshiva jānat avivekā pranavākshar ke madhye yeh tīno ekā aum jai shiv omkārā = The truly enlightened (like the swan or the self-realized) know Brahmā, Vishnu and Sadashiva are indeed one within the holy/sacred/auspicious syllable Pranava (AUM). Aum, victory to Shiva-Omkaara. |'Chaander Haasir Baandh Bhengechhe': link. | BG 9.17: || pitāham asya jagato mātā dhātā pitāmahaḥ vedyaḿ pavitram oḿkāra|| ~ "I am the father (pitah)of this universe (jagato), the mother (mata), the support (dhata) and the grandsire (pitamahaḥ). I am the bestower of non-transient knowledge - the wisdom of knowledge leading to supreme or highest enlightenment (para vidya - when kundalini energy travels to the Sahasrara - the 7th chakra or crown chakra - the highest chakra), the purifier (dispeller of unwanted aspects, such as ignorance, confusion, delusion, etc) and the syllable oḿ."| Omkara = the praṇava or Shabda Brahmn. ~ The Almighty is saguna, manifested OM - Para Brahmn, Brahm-putri or Omswaroop.

~ If we can understand this, we will also comprehend: what the impersonal, unmanifested'Narayana' is all about, and what the saguna, manifested 'Narayani' represents. 

... And then, we can also gain clarity about which of them is indicated in the 'Dasavatara' - the ten principal manifestations (avatars) - to help and guide mankind/humanity whenever malevolence gains the upper-hand (i.e. when negativism becomes a bane) - yuge-yuge, yug/era after yug/era ~ as per the promised: || yada yada hi dharmasya glanir bhavati bharata abhyutthanam adharmasya tadatmanam srjamy aham- BG IV-7 || ~ dharma-samsthapanarthaya - to renew/revive/re-energize/reinvigorate/revitalize/rejuvenate the principles of dharma [duties and responsibilities - whether performed individually or collaboratively - resulting in or contributing towards the larger societal goals] and diligent karm-yog (steadfast, well-thought-out action(s) instead of adhoc fixes, platitudes, insouciance, etc) ~ I manifest Myself (sambhavami) yuge-yuge - yug/era after yug/era. | In other words: whenever and wherever societal 'churn' (manthan) becomes too difficult... so much so that humanity is bewildered - unable to find a solution or direction, or is hurtling towards 'quicksand' (quagmire)... only then, the Almighty manifests - to stem the 'churn' (manthan), to stabilize and to rejuvenate. ... In other words: When the 'churn' (manthan) becomes too great, the avatars manifest themselves to correct or reset the course. ~ Only an avatar can lift humanity from zero level or from sub-zero level (i.e. from the lowest point - from considerable ignorance, confusion, stagnation, decay etc - signifying the metaphoric 'quicksand' or quagmire)... and put it back on an upward trajectory; only an avatar has the capacity/caliber/ability to be that catalyst: to prevent a collapse of basic structure of mankind, to prevent humanity's slide into 'quicksand' or quagmire (or to pull it out from one) ~ to achieve a turn-around... to set the ball rolling, so to speak. [~ And, this should help us understand what the Varaha-avatar (the great one-tusked boar) is indicative of. This avatar is regarded as the supreme form of Sri Vishnu; if we comprehend the concept of dualism or duality... we can also understand what this means.] 

Perhaps, only the Almighty (Mahat, Ishvari, Para Brahmn or 'Brahma-putri') is familiar with the cosmic architecture - about the three cosmic phenomenon of 'Creation-Maintenance-Dissolution' (represented by the impersonal, unmanifested cosmic Trimurti of 'Brahma-Vishnu-Shiva'). And so, the Almighty is aware of the growth and evolution of the Manifested Cosmos, and so on.

The impersonal, unmanifested Absolute OM/Brahmn (Primal Creative Energy) is beyond all thought. ~ Energy has no form or gender.

BG 10.22: || indriyanam manas casmi bhutanam asmi cetana || ~ "Of the senses (indriyanam) I am the mind (manas); and in living beings (bhutanam) I am the living force (cit or cetana - sentience)."| If we can understand this, we will also understand what has been meant by Karna's 'chariot wheel sank deep into the ground'. | When an individual loses consciousness ~ it is a reference to the living force or vital energy (cit or cetana - sentience), also known as life force or vital breath (prana).

PurushaPrimal Cosmic Energy (Absolute OM/Brahmn) or the Self-existent impersonal spirit/energy; the Divine Essence, from which all things emanate, by which they are sustained, and to which they return. ~ Jiva-atma (mere Self or individual consciousness - sentience or cetana - living force or vital energy) too is part of this Self-existent impersonal spirit/energy. | Param-atma or Para-Brahmn represents the Atman or Supersoul - Higher Self or Universal Consciousness (universal intelligence or cosmic mind). In other words: the Almighty. ~ BG 9.4: || mayā tatam idaḿ sarvaḿ jagad avyakta-mūrtinā mat-sthāni sarva-bhūtāni na cāhaḿ teṣv avasthitaḥ || ~ "By Me, in My unmanifested form, this entire universe is pervaded. All beings are in Me, but I am not in them."| The first-half of this verse indicates the impersonal, unmanifested Absolute OM/Brahmn (Cosmic Light or Light Divine - Self-existent impersonal spirit/energy or divine essence). The latter-half is indicative of the Atman or Supersoul (Universal Consciousness or Higher Self - Param-atma or Para-Brahmn).

... For this confluence, i.e. for the merging or confluence of the mere Self (individual consciousness - cetana or sentience) with the Higher Self (universal consciousness; universal intelligence or cosmic mind) to happen - the gentle 'awakening' or 'rousing' of the latent spiritual energy - kundalini - lying dormant at the base of the spine - is required... so that this living and conscious energy pervades an individual's entire being. [~ 'Nirjarer Swapnabhango' ('Awakening of the Fountain' or 'Rousing of the Fountain'). Fountain = spring, sarasa.] ~ Devoted and unselfish service to society or humanity - Nishkam karm-yog - is one path. ... However, there is no hard-and-fast rule. ~ Self-realization is the process of genuine, inner spiritual transformation and must be experienced to be understood, since it lies beyond the domain of scriptural description or academic definition (terminologies, etc). ~ The union or confluence of the jiva-atma (the mere Self or individual consciousness - cetana or sentience) with the Atman (Higher Self or Supersoul - the Universal Consciousness i.e. universal mind or cosmic intelligence - Param-atma or Para Brahmn) is called Sanaatan Dharma or Aadi Dharma. ~ This 'way of life' is performative and is (therefore) to be experienced.Thus, the central concepts of dharma and karm-yog elude translation. | Self-realization can be described as the pathway or route to inner perfection ~ one's progress as a human being... leading to Supreme or highest Enlightenment (a pure or perfect person - the state of complete wisdom, the stage where nirvana is attained - the state of a Buddha). [~ 'Prana Bhoriye Trisha Hariye': link.] ... With the complete 'awakening' or 'rousing' of the kundalini energy... illusions disappear and clarity begins... thus barriers such as inflated ego, arrogance, confusion, delusion, selfish considerations, vainglory, etc can be surmounted. This brings about self-knowledge (atma-vidya - self-reflection or knowledge of the Self) - leading to Sat-cit-ananda - inner joy and contentment - the eternal bliss or spiritual ecstasy (total contentment) of "self-realization". [~ When the Sat (universal consciousness) pervades one's sentience or consciousness (cit) it brings about true contentment (ananda) - inner joy, peace and tranquility... melting away or surmounting ego, vanity, delusions, etc. 'Prana Bhoriye Trisha Hariye': link. ~'Aaro alo, aaro alo, ei nayaney prabhu (My Lord) dhalo | surey surey banshi purey tumi aaro aaro aaro dao taan. ... Mor aami (ego-consciousness) dube jak nemey sudhadharey aponare (universal consciousness/Supersoul/Higher Self) tumi aaro aaro aaro karo daan'.] ~ Kundalini awakening connects a jiva-atma (mere Self or sentience - finite 'I') to his or her Atman (Supersoul, Para Brahmn, Param-atma or Higher Self - Infinite 'I' - universal intelligence or cosmic mind). ~ This Atman is the eternal aspect of an individual's personality; when an individual become totally connected with it, such a person becomes a Buddha (the Enlightened One - imbued with the light of wisdom or the state of complete wisdom, non-transient knowledge - para vidya). ~ Such a person attains nirvana; in other words: such a person is non-deluded - due to non-attachment to materialistic aspects or sense objects, or by the transient nature of the material or manifested world that he or she inhabits; such a person (therefore) gains eternal (sat or perfect [satya] i.e. non-transient) knowledge - para vidya ~ internal wisdom or perception, insight and accurate interpretation - the ability to see the larger picture, transcend egocentricity, and to find the deeper meaning inherent in all things. | The confluence or convergence of the finite into the Infinite, the mere Self (finite 'I') within the Higher Self (Infinite 'I')... leading to an individual's spiritual and intellectual awakening and evolution ~ the journey towards the awareness that the finite is inseparable from the Infiniteis self-realization. ~ In other words: Self-realization (or Param-atma realization) is to fully know and understand oneself (atmavidya - self-reflection). Before knowing God, it is important to know oneself (Atmavidya or "knowledge of the Self"). If one understands oneself... only then it is possible to understand God, i.e. only then can one gain Brahmavidya or "knowledge of Brahmn", Manifested Cosmos, etc. [~ Here, Brahmn = Higher Self, Atman, Param-atma, Para Brahmn or Supersoul - Universal Consciousness - universal intelligence or cosmic mind.] With the realization of the Universal Consciousness (Atman, Supersoul, Para Brahmn or Higher Self) come universal compassion, love, and the awareness of the oneness of all things (higher knowledge - para vidya). 

The Cosmic Entity or Primal/Eternal Being (Para Brahmn) is Purushottama or Purusha-uttama (Supreme Being) or Purushottama Satya - Supreme Godhead. ~ Mahadeva (God of Gods) or adhaataa - above whom there is no other. | The impersonal Absolute OM/Brahmn is Omprakash (Cosmic Light or Light Divine - Divine Effulgence). ~ The Almighty is Para Brahmn, Brahm-putri or  Omswaroop - manifestation or personification of the impersonal, unmanifested Absolute OM. [~ Purusha does not mean 'male'; that is mistranslation.]

... The Matsya kingdom of the Mahabharata times is probably modern-day Rajasthan. Satyavati hailed from this kingdom (Matsya kingdom of the Mahabharata times), and is therefore referred to as "Matsya-kanya". (It does not mean fisher-woman or daughter of a fisherman. Kanya = female. ... In Treta or Dvapar, the concept of "caste" did not exist. An individual was known by his or her personality traits, i.e. innate nature (pravritti) and qualities (gunas or talent). It was not based on birth or heredity. ~ Even the Nandas, Mauryas and the Gupta emperors came from humble origins. Valmiki or Hanuman-ji was a "vaan-nar" - forest-(vaan)-dwelling human (nar). Maharshi Valmiki, before his spiritual transformation, was a niṣāda (nishada) or vyadh (forest-dwelling hunter-gather) known as Ratnakara. Vaan-nars, including nishadas, were adivasi. Sri Ram and his associates' sustained effort mainstreamed them, i.e. it proved to the other groups of humans that these too were full-fledged humans - with a distinct 'way of life', and not sub-humans or animals (as indicated by Hanuman-ji's symbolic tail). |"Hanu" means jaw in Sanskrit. It probably refers to a prominent jaw as a distinctive facial feature of these groups. Hanuman = one with a distinctive jaw. Greeva = jawline; Su = good or handsome. |Whoever was a seeker of knowledge, or trod the path of knowledge and/or was a wise and highly learned or knowledgeable person was a "Brahmana". Anyone engaged in or having a talent for administrative or defense-related activities/functions was a "Kshatriya". Someone with a talent for mercantile or trading activities was a "Vaishya". While a person engaged in or having a talent for agro-based activities or artisanship or craftsmanship was a "Sudra". [There was also a Sudra kingdom, an ancient kingdom mentioned in the Mahabharata.] The "varnaH-system" was essentially indicative of the available talent and work force. It was not meant to indicate a social hierarchy, although "Brahmanas" probably were accorded respect due to their wisdom and knowledge. [~ Adivasi groups have always existed. Adi = original or foremost; vasi = dwellers. ... The "varnaH-system" enumerated four varnas. | VarnaH = innate nature (pravritti) and qualities (gunas or talent). ~ What became of it though is a result of the post Gupta era drift and flounder; it probably started with the decline of this era. ~ The word "caste" is derived from "casta" which is a Portuguese word - meaning, 'purity of descent'. Also, the previous eras and even the pre Gupta era was much different with respect to civic sense, town-planning, etc; our ancients possessed much more knowledge and extremely advanced technology than we moderns, given our linear view of history, are willing to give them credit for. ~ Decline of the Gupta era also saw mistranslation of the ancient texts, as well as stratification of society... based on various aspects, including on gender lines. | Several paths centred around social reformers came about after the decline of the Gupta era... thereby giving an opportunity to various groups of people who were being marginalized in the societal 'churn' (manthan) that came about after the decline of the Gupta era. ~ It is possible that what is now known as Jainism and Buddhism too evolved during this period - to accommodate various groups of people, - i.e. to basically become part of the reform process. An objective assessment also indicates that colonization too was a part of the solution. |Schedule = list. The concept of "outcaste" came about after the decline of the Gupta era, as part of the societal 'churn' (manthan) for influence and power. E.g. certain groups 'stooped to conquer' and successfully excommunicated other (influential) groups, e.g. from the court of kings or minor rulers etc. ~ The former then replaced the latter in position, influence, and so on. ~ Traveling overseas on board ships (i.e. crossing the seas) too was deemed reason enough to be excommunicated. ~ Education and medical facilities were denied, entry to places of worship was barred. Gradually other retrogressive 'customs' came about. Doctors treating the 'marginalized' were excommunicated. In certain parts, women from so-called marginalized groups were barred from covering their upper torso; there are also instances where women from relatively well-off groups (non-marginalized) had to appear bare-torsoed in front of the priestly class, so on and so forth. ~ One will be hard-pressed to find such parallels even in Mlechcha (savage, uncivilized) cultures.] | Satyavati later became the queen of Hastinapura. ~ As for the Matsya kingdom: maybe their insignia or emblem was that of a fish or dolphin. ... Did the matsya-avatar hail from this ancient kingdom ~ my guess is as good as yours. |In Rajasthan there are many temples of Meenesh, but the first Meenesh temple was in Pushkara, Rajasthan. The seventh and current "Manu" (honorific for the overseer of a manavantar) - Vaivasvata Manu or Surya (original name: Satyavrata) is also the father of Ikshvaku - the progenitor of the Ikshvaku lineage (also known as: Aikṣvāka lineage) - to which greats like Mandhata, Dilīpa, Bhagiratha, Raghu and Sri Ram belonged. ~ Satyavrata built specially-designed ships (nao) before the last great flood/deluge (Mahajal Pralay) - as per the advise of the Matsya-Avatar (one-horned fish). Noukeshwar is at best a title or honorific, meaning - Principal/Chief/Captain of the nao. (Here 'nao' or 'boat' indicates specially-designed-and-equipped-ship.) ~ Whether 'Noukeshwar' has been abbreviated to 'Noah' (due to the passage of time + change in phonetics), and/orwhether Satyavrata aka Vaivasvata Manu is also referred to as "Noah" or not ~ my guess is as good as yours. The Maurya clan is believed to have been an offshoot of the Shakya clan - to which Shri Gautam Buddh belonged. The Shakya clan is in turn believed to be a tributary of the Ikshvaku clan - to which Shri Ram belonged. The Ikshvaku clan is also known as the Raghuvanshi lineage (Raghuvansh or Raghukula) - after Sri Ram's illustrious ancestor, Raghu. ... Sri Ram is known as Raghav (meaning: belonging to the Raghus or Raghuvansh/Raghukula - lineage of Raghu). ~ And since he is considered as the jewel of the Raghu lineage... he is therefore known as Raghupati.

Description of the Stars of S'is'umâra, our Coiling Galaxy: Sri Vishnu (~ the Maintenance or Stabilizing[cosmic architecture] aspect of the impersonal, unmanifested Absolute OM/Brahmn) is Swastika, the coiled baby dolphin of galaxy: Sishumara. ~ With its tail pointing to the end of the row of fixed stars in the sky [dhruva] and with its head bent downwards, it has its body coiled. The [planets of] Prajâpati, Agni, Indra and Dharma are found on the tail with [those of] Dhâtâ and Vidhâtâ at its base. The seven sages [Saptarishi] are situated on its hip. With its body coiling to the right there are as its separate body parts at its northern side the constellations of the fourteen stars [from Abhijit to Punarvasu] that mark the northern course [of the sun] and to the south there are the same number of them [from Pushyâ to Uttarâshâdhâ] marking the southern course. Together the both sides appear like the coiled body of a dolphin. On its back one sees the stars called Ajavîthî and on the belly one sees the 'celestial Ganges' [the series of stars along the full body of the S'is'umâra we know as our Milky Way.] Some imagine this great army of luminaries to be a s'is'umâra [a dolphin] and describe it, concentrated in yoga, as [that what can be seen of] Sri Vishnu (~ the Maintenance/Stabilizing aspect of the impersonal, unmanifested Absolute OM/Brahmn).

The right-handed swastika symbol originated in ancient India and is the symbol of the mighty River SarasvatI as well as 'Aryavarsha' - also known as the Sindhu-SarasvatI Sabhyata/Civilization (~ possibly the oldest civilization in the world, and thus the cradle of civilization.) It is also the sign of Sanaatan Dharma (Aadi Dharma). The most common design on the Indus seals is the swastika. ~ The Swastika represents the cosmic spinning vortex. ~ In Sanaatan Dharma, the swastika represents the Universe in our own spiral galaxy in the (symbolic) forefinger of Sri Vishnu. ~ This carries most significance in establishing the creation of the Universe and the arms as 'kaalah' or time. [Time is ‘kaalah’ in Sanskrit.] 

Swastika is considered to be a mark of auspiciousness and good fortune. Red Swastika (made with red vermilion, prepared with natural ingredients) is the sign of Sanaatan Dharma; it depicts a cross with four arms of equal lengths. The end of each of the arms is bent at a right angle. At times, dots are also added between the arms. The right-facing swastika (Sanskrit: Svastika) in the decorative form is used to evoke sacred force. | The most traditional form of the swastika's symbolization in Sanaatan Dharma is that the symbol represents the purusharthas (~ the eternal, enlightened 'way of life' guided by the purusha-uttama - the Almighty): dharma (that which makes a human a human), artha(wealth), kama (desire, all kinds of desire), and moksha(liberation). All four are needed for a full life. However, two (wealth and desire) are limited and can only give limited joy. They are the two closed arms of the swastika. The other two are unlimited and are the open arms of the swastika. [Purusha-uttama = the greatest of all beings, and refers to the Almighty.]

The term Swastika has been derived from the Sanskrit word "Svastika", which means well-being: "SU" means "good" or "auspicious,""ASTI" means "to be," and "KA" as a suffix. The swastika literally means, "to be good". Alternatively: "swa" is "higher self" (Supersoul or Universal Consciousness), "asti" meaning "being", and "ka" as a suffix, so the translation can be interpreted as: "being with higher self". Suasti thus means "well-being." The suffix -kaeither forms a diminutive or intensifies the verbal meaning, and suastikamight thus be translated literally as "that which is associated with well-being," corresponding to "lucky charm" or "thing that is auspicious." ~ Thus swastika means any lucky or auspicious object, and in particular a mark made on persons and things to denote auspiciousness, good luck or well-being. 
   
Viewing all 92 articles
Browse latest View live